Pesach: The Entity of the Shalosh Regalim & the Machlokes Torah Temimah and Rav Soloveitchik

this torah class is brought to you by torahanytime.com i had an aura for a long time on the tv lives that we say on the show golem we know the main body of shema esri whether chakras most of minhamarev begins on the shashvargalam we say ransom you chose us from all the nations the going says that refers to pesach when hashem took us out of israel and he selected us from all the nations you showed your love to us when you gave us the torah on on sinai ferocity and you showed your favor to us you showed ritsuy to us this is when the evangel returned his love to us with the return of the ananyaka void on sukis after the i always like to think that the nosok continues you elevated us above all languages that goes back to pesach one of the reasons we were taking adam it's raining you sanctified us with your mitzvos that refers like back to shavuous when hashem gave us the torah mitzvahs the care of ton of marking you brought us close to your avoida with the return out of the ananyakaveda on the mishkan you brought us close again to your avoida back to sukkah so in other words and that is further elucidated by viraimaan tanumikala shanice and that is further explained by the kidash channel according to the vilnigan the three expressions refers to the israel so always wondered why mention atavakartanu and ahafta isano on sukkis sukkah says we don't mention shabbis on circus why mention pesach we don't mention rosh hashanah and yom kippur in other words why by each one of the golem why would we mention the qualities and the benefits of the other two regalim it's not that regal it's this particular regal and really throughout the nosaka of the tv we refer to shalosh calls we referred to all of the gala so it seems to me probably a davar pasha probably something that is a simple idea and probably has occurred to everyone and that is aside from the fact that we're now enjoying the yum tif of pesach and on every particular regal we're enjoying that regal but aside from that there is a dimension that a regal is part of the entity called shaleshwagallam there is a entity there is a time there is a type of kadusa a wavelength of kadusa called shalashwagalem so therefore all the shrugalim are the same yes they each have their different qualities but they're all part of that entity called shalosh regalim and it is appropriate to mention the qualities of all the regular by each regal to substantiate this idea we know that when the bilum was going to curse claudius so his donkey was not letting him and bilham hits the donkey and the donkey says are you going to uproot a nation that observes the sholish regalim the three regalim and that's how rashi interprets the words of the hammar of billam so we see already in the hummish that these holidays are called regalim literally legs why are they called legs rabbi yosef gektilian likewise that is represented and it stands on the four legs of the regalim pesach and sukis and david which is so to speak reg al bethnayatsumay corresponds to shemini attares which is reg albert nayatsumai so again from this idea the depiction would be that the regalim are three legs of one entity though the entity is the chair so in other words just to focus on the particular regel in a way would be short-sighted and narrow-minded because the purpose of the regal is to hold up the entity so aside from focusing on yes this is pesach but pesach is one of the amudim that holds up hashem's presence so we need to focus on the fact that this is not just pesach it is one of the important legs holding up the keys one part of the great entity of sha lish regalim so i saw another substantiation of this idea that aside from the fact that this is a yamchav prati but it's also part of the great entity there's a very interesting shita mentioned by the baal tara tamima in the safer box on page shin lamitas and also on page mem and he brings a tremendous and he says on the show golem we we say baruch hades he says you know let me tell you something about the development of the printing press and this is one of his um very classic maneuvers or approaches and he says that everybody so each printer was bona bona the atma everyone had their own enterprise and really had free reign to if desire to manipulate the text and what happened was of course on every regal they would say is however that's it's a mouthful because that means the the one who composes the master the one who prince the master he has to write three different areas um it's too complicated so um what he did was mikhail he wrote on the side and hopefully you remember which man we're talking about whether it's peso whether it's or whether it's and the proof is says uh the tara tamim and the amer we say mekhadesh israel has and he there and and uh he therefore says the correct no should be every yamthafe you should conclude with that particular yamtif and he says the proof's in the pudding it says in the bracha of the torah how do we conclude allah well that's what we do but if you look at masak soyprim it says that you should say mekadesh israel so clearly the correct thing to do is not to refer to all this manum in general but to say the specific yamtif however very interestingly in the safer nephesharav a reversal he brings on page kuff paybays to page kofpay give one i saw this in a new safer beautiful safer immer barach of harabar salman shrita he says that his rebbie yashira salvation did not agree with the taratuma and in fact he personally um spoke to the tartan and expressed his disagreement with him that no the correct no such behind the khadesh israel the hazmat and that is because in salvation's view each one of the oven toivim does not have independent kedushas hayoim but rather they are part of one entity of kedusa namely something called the yamtif that when yamdev comes out in the spring it is called pesach and when yamdev comes out in the umayyamers when it comes out in the harvest is called sukhois but it's not inherently a different wavelength of kadusa rosh hashanah is kadusa yum kipras kadush nayatsumai but the shala shrigalum it's one kadusa depending on when it falls out falls out springtime is pesach time is called shivuas but again this is uh the idea that it seemed to me would be a proper idea that we see from the whole nusakhatvillah that there is an entity called shall golem and therefore aside from the fact that we are now on i think it is imperative for a jew to appreciate that we're now at asman called moyed this is a time that we meet with akades barco it's a tri-annual uh three-time a year meeting it's expressed in different names at different times of the year and salvation says the proof is that the german rosh hashanah of the dawn of brings according to one opinion that the israel is only when the three regulum passed khisidran why is baatacha only when the three were going past kasiran what are the three um have to do with each other say no there is a concept of the hazmat them so aside from the fact that there is a specific entity to each yamtif the three regalam are part of one entity that we're saying holds up the ki sayakawi and um hashem's glory is manifest to the lord i believe the safe allah iqram says the shall israel golem testify to the three great principles pesach to protest to torah minhash and sukis also upholds the great principle of hashem's existence so there's a concept that the three of them together create one particular entity based on this a virtual shakhtar offers a tremendous which is not uh agreed upon by most of the paiskim namely he says that if during the shalashwagalam you omit on pesach some of the sukham of sukkos or some such lewis maybe you would not be say satira because the sukkim that are read about uh all shawshankam are critical for each one of the shah shrigalam so this is not agreed upon by rafael zalman margos and the shahraf raim because he brings that if let's say the fifth aliyah on sukis you did not read the psukim of khaga sukhois and then you already made the bracha afterwards he says you have to take out the safer tower again because you didn't read the sukkam of sukis but clearly this is only a diyon this is only a question if on sukis you didn't read the sukuma of sukis but if let's say on one of the other if you omitted some of the other tsukim ah the pesach pesa or sukham of shibuyasa on sukkah that would not be um an issue bidiavid so it seems like the paiskim do not agree with this although this idea and this concept that the shoshwa golem are considered an entity in in them of themselves and they have to be referred to and that philos of all the shoshogalam is certainly substantiated by our nusa of makkah and as we mentioned from the fact that by all shoshru golem we refer to atavakartonomi sanu paratzi sabaro wishing everyone a good time and a good yamtif you've just experienced another torah class brought to you by torahanytime.com