Parshas Devarim- Chazon with Rabbi Simcha Bunim Berger

Good. Okay, we're good to go. Good evening. This is the moral on the week of the week before. So, it's the moral on the we're going to read a piece from B. We started this last week and it's a new but it's a heamshar had said because of kamsa baramsa the first p mdish was destroyed we explained that the idea of kamsa and baramsa was that there were there was a mus and one of the big takeaways from last year was >> Maral says Baramso was the enemy. So why is Kamsa and Baramso both mentioned together? >> The terret was just because he mixed up the two must speak. It's not a good enough reason. The answer that my says was that Kamso was his friend. But he was his friend even to support Hauugra in fighting against Baramso. Meaning the rahmonus of Kamso a words of the Mahal. When you have two that are fighting and you might be able to do something and diffuse this and you don't and instead he's still your friend the itself the support which is helping continuing the is in itself there is that's creating and therefore like the mar said last week meant like an ant or meant like a kamit a something skimmed off the top something that's malic Now last week we said which is one place one mikdash one mb that represents unity of was destroyed top of the page in your handout. I want you to know says the maral that everything that happened to cla was exactly the way it unfortunately the way it had to be had to be in the sense that destroyed the second why in between the two mdashes as we'll soon see each one had their Clausro during bay was notus there were two separate malus there was malus yehuda and malus is there were separate kings we don't find that the bas mikdash was destroyed by isan because of the lack of aus as we'll soon see the gmorra says and you can look at the maral actually why should we soon see Take a look. I'm going to skip ahead and I'm going to come back. See the the where it says next paragraph that were are associated with contamination won't be there when cla has this type of tumo. is a form of which is certainly to and which Thomas is mi giml. Bas did not have bias and came in. They could still go on. Why? As long as you saw a mile of kadusha. When Earro was given to Clus, it was given. We refer to the as the known as the Each of them in their own way. Therefore, was aim that thanks to the belonged who were known as kadoshim could be in a kadesh once they started with these type of aus which were to a so ma they were no longer they were they couldn't stay theirs themsel to understand that the three aas gilarayas and a Zoro each in their own way undid the kadusha of the Aramitz and Yakov each brought a kadusha to Clus which the three aus was connected was an algabit When you saw being they were contaminating the Royu was the person responsible ible was the person responsible called that is every one of the names of the families of Claus in paras there's a hey and a yud in the beginning and the end a temple a stamp from the aishar the abisher is zuk Every single one we said over many times his cash to the mo when he came home from a day's work medish. How do you know which tent to go to? Where do you know to go? Maybe this one went to the mikvah. How do you know where to go? on top of a tent. He saw the on top of a tent. Say he went to the he went to the shift the opposite of Gilas. So when you saw me they were defiling the kadush of of we just mentioned by zerosimshin the opposite of you're ready to kill somebody is the opposite of the where you accept everybody where you give to everybody. When you were it was defiling the kadush of so which was a land predicated and given to us because of the kadush when lost the land you lose what you have when you forfeit the reason that you have it. If the of isim then the defilement of that takes it away from them that was the sin which took away they weren't all together but that wasn't the of why they had eritis. So the fact that they lacked aus there wasn't such a big issue. The kadusha was the issue because it was predicated and built on kadusha. So if you go back now to that morale that second little paragraph that's the not go back another paragraph in wasn't Perfect. Is during bias wasn't perfect. They weren't perfect. They had they weren't being given erit based on their togetherness. They were given based on the and as long as they were with the mistakes that they had. So they had so they had bring they brought they brought they were always able to fix things up. Once they lost their kadusha they lost the basis the basis of then they lost. That was it. That's by going back to that third paragraph the mikdash was destroyed because of the of that was by skip ahead to the next paragraph. We did that. In bay sheni clausol had unity clausol had become one nation and therefore as long as clusol they weren't better necessarily in giluarayas that doesn't mean that there were bigger sadikim in that realm in baeni but baeni wasn't built on kadu was built on and say that even a that's but if you have they won the wars was let's take two minutes to explain cla ro during bas and while they were in Gulas for the 70 years had a decree came to the south of where they would have been totally wiped out. The decree was already given one If we can do something together, we bow down to we bow down to and we have so many other things against us will be will give us the kaducha and the to be able to have a bd they can't have a rabbi site When Claus was through their togetherness, to be one unit, to be one unit, to be one person, to be when was to be together, they were to the B mikdash and the BA mikdos was predicated on that. My Rebi once said, "Gald Ezra Nehemia, they were macking all the sura of what?" And of listen to the following thought that the rebat gaz once upon a time in bayish and claw was so holy said when there was unbelievable like 1.2 million. You spoke to the spoke back. The was individual. There was no such a thing as >> no. >> There was no spoke back to you. The m that you and I should together is only if you and I say the same thing. If we both say we both say if you're ding for your and you're ding for your house and he's because and you have your own How are we diving together? And the point was he didn't need it because their connection to the they were so close and they were so connected. Because everybody was Yes, straight to the everybody. The individual connection to the what when say the bay was so great. You saw a come down from Shamay. All of the miracles which it says in all the miracles that happened not excuse me. It was clear that there was an abisher. The world was and everybody connected the individually that we lost. We were but we had something else. We had the will come down everybody together the same Ezra said here's what you say. How come? Because I don't know what I'm talking to because talk to us. We lost gay. You're talking to somebody. He talks back to you. You know what to say. When there's you speak to the and there's a and the speaks back to you so you get an understanding of what you're talking about. What do you know what you're saying? Am I saying the right thing or not saying the right thing? So you needed and they were everything that would have to ask. That's how great that once somebody said to me he said in a shir once the greatest kabala safer we have is the sitter the all of that and they brought that down the moment that saw were that they should have a connection to the aish in such a way was by that's when we got it and that was predicated that's what basi was all about says the before that that's the that that we said that's all part of wasn't we had it wasn't it was and when we can dive into the that way we have a until we just like int went after to destroy their mil. Therefore, that was on the bias that would have brought like we said over from my bashame would have broughti it would have turned into bayishi nor claw lost. it because of their and that to the best of our capabilities is our that's what we have to do. Our job is to find ways to be to connect to all those that we don't connect to to have to be sensitive to be understanding to be That way we can be even though we're not on such a level. We're not so holy. But we learned that to have a mdash. We just can't have and we can't have then we can have a mdashem. We should be maken ourselves. should be able to be Messiah Bezos Hashem and bring back