Overview Of The dinim of a Sota, and emphasizes what it means in Avoda. Rabbi Yossi Paltiel 5782

[Music] so we didn't have sunday we didn't have monday we didn't have tuesday it's the first opportunity we're doing pasha so um the topic that i chose was saito why did i choose pasture city because i have many classes on essay i went online i looked at my site i think i have ten classes about just not saying a lot of stuff because that i touched on i have a class on nausea it's so old they don't even remember giving the class but there's a class on nazis i figured let's do sight i have nothing in pastor satan we're going to do sata everybody knows what a saita is such is a very unusual because it's it's a din it's a mitzvah based on a hashad right it's a whole series of him a whole ritual the whole say that based on an uncertainty we don't know right it's not like somebody did something it has to be corrected a person is suspect the person is accused of doing something which they're not supposed to do we don't know for sure if they did it and there's a whole ceremony that's supposed to ascertain whether they did it they didn't do it now first of all the question which bothers everybody is how come it's always the woman the woman maybe there's something which is negative we blame another woman first of all a woman cannot do innovator without a man but this parsha focuses on the woman the pastor doesn't focus on the man the gemara says for those who learn satan that hashem a woman was a saita and her husband was makana her husband told her altissa city please don't be alone with this person and she didn't listen and she was alone and she went to the basement and she drank the water see he dies also he dies the same death that she dies but the ceremony and the embarrassment and the uh the the the way such a ceremony was done that other women were called to come and watch it was done to her it was not done to him it's very very hard to understand this i'm going to tell you the correct answer it's not an answer which is going to emotionally answer the question but the correct answer is because a man and a woman is god in the jewish people and the the structure of the traitor reflects that in other words why is the tater written in a way to appear so patriarchal because the man is marshall franco and the woman is the washer for yidden and there's a proof of this in halacha and again i'm not trying to settle your emotional pain i know i can't but intellectually right is that when a man gets married a man has to marry his wife she can't marry him we don't believe in exchanging rings when a man divorces his wife he has to give her a divorce she cannot give him a divorce but those alakas are only true who have sheva mitzvah by the laws of marriage and divorce by have halakhas within the parameters of title the halakhas of marriage and divorce by in the parameters of terror do not give any supremacy to the men of the woman he could marry her she could marry him he could divorce her and she could divorce him the whole idea that the the the power of kedushin and the khev of genesis only on the husband and it's not on the wife is only by eden and this is the reason the real reason why because it's a muscle for babysitting the jewish people i understand that emotionally that doesn't answer the question but the emotional answers to the question are worse than this they're not i don't think they're more helpful so i'm just i'm saying this at the outset that the reason the the parish of satan is written for a woman because we're the woman and the man is the abhished and that's the token of this parachute that there is a suspicion this is a sasha on the jewish people which the abhishek has and so forth and so on you wanted to say okay now kaidem kol you probably know that i'm you don't know that it's a wonderful rambam to know how do we spell the word saita right charges one the newer prince of rambam the in you have it by hara frankel and you have it also in the in kappax rambam i don't think you have it in the amram which is based on kisfayad they found manuscripts from the jews of taemin of yemen who were the most loyal to the rambam and their texts their copies are considered the most authentic the rambam spells sata with a sin not with a summer it's shoiter shin involved tests hey but the data is on the left on the right so it's written satan was with a sin and of course that makes complete sense because the correct translation of the word saita means someone who does something foolish like the mother says a person will never do an aveda unless he's taken over by a spirit of temporary insanity you would never do something wrong unless you lost your mind and you should know that it says in tanya right if it's true veda they can plead insanity toyota says toyota says a person would not do an aveda until he's temporarily possessed by a spirit of folly of stupidity of stoos so you could argue in an insanity plea when i did this event i lost my mind because in my right mind i wouldn't have done it and this idea is brought in this is an unbelievable image when a person does an aveda it's because they literally lost control over themselves because they temporarily lost control over their mind now that doesn't mean that a person should do any of aid in the world and say listen i must have lost my mind because otherwise i wouldn't have done it but this is the methias atv the mother says a person doesn't evade it when they lose their mind and of course bentania preach that this phenomenon that a person when he doesn't evade or loses his mind happens in almost every aveda they only evade it people as a rule do not lose their mind is that aveda which would make them cut off from the hebrew state completely which is the khattav disorder right after that brings you test then when it comes to the temporary insanity which allows a person to do an aveda almost any aveda does not touch what's called the shama the place so the first thing i want to talk about is the concept of an adulterous woman and she's not an adult woman she's a woman who's suspect of adultery a woman or an official who didn't invade it that does aid him first theta there's aidan fertuma she has to divorce her husband she loses exuber that's the um and of course there's also what i should do she was properly warned of me and so on we're talking in a case where there's no way they steve there's it's a whole many opinions in the gemara how many a do we need for quinoa and how many ideas we need for steeda but kidney means when you warn her the dinner of a saita practically speaking every time a woman goes alone into a house with a man she's out of sight if a woman spends time with a man and her husband comes along and later says you know i don't think you should live with that man there's not a sight the dinner of a scientist he specifically warns her i'll play me he doesn't say that don't go into a room with any man just this particular man i don't want you to be alone with this person and he warned her in front of adam and she went anyway this is a dinner of a sata after she's to this this kino the warning and then there's the stita which is allah with him and toma means the aveda if there's a.j thomas there's no din of sata she's a she was a she was a naive just to divorce her husband and she loses her soulmate we're talking we don't know there was quinoa with adam and there was stite but there's a child of two eight and one adam the point that she was along with this person and the kimora says that i am the david is reason to be afraid because she was born so that is the dinner of a satan so i want to talk about this concept of the idea that a person loses his mind and he doesn't have aid and i want to speak about it on three levels in other words i want to talk about the concept of which you have in taira and you have in hasidis because i two of my sources are from tanya my third source is from the countries umayyad i believe there's three concepts of ruachstus so i want to i want to flush them out i want to use soyta as my platform to flush out three concepts indoors the first is this it says in tanya chapter eight tanya chapter eighty percent of a jew has no desire to sin the navy bahamas as a jew if it's permitted he wants to indulge till the end the nefesh are bahamus of a yid they never shall bahamas of a year there's no desire to sin the rabbit says in boston the same is true by a the never shall bahamus of a which is a different kind of bahamas has no desire to sin when it comes to the seven evaders in other words there created every human being with a personality for the nature just like the amish that created animals with a personality and the nature now the nature and the personality of an animal and all the nature the personality of the nephesh of bahamas the video is not holy nothing holy about it it's a personality right there are animals that kill and eat meat do animals who eat grass their animals will scavenge everybody's different nature some animals are so bloodlustful that they'll kill even if they're hungry other animals only kill as much as they need there are all kinds of different natures every animal has a personality which was imposed by him by his creator this is his tavern this is his containment this is his limitation and the prospect says it's mentioned in chapter 24 yes apostles mandated nature that the abrasive gave an animal and the mandated nature that the amish that gives a yid has a line that they don't cross and the personality of a jew tither's head that he wants a kosher titus he wants a nasheed today if he has no desire for and the same is true when it comes to niuf the nefesh bahamas of wants to indulge in in in with its mutter but it has absolutely no desire in his nature to cross the line from it's against the nature of his nephesha bahamas it's against his personality and that's the first concept of when a person does a sin on the first level that sin is called the rulers because they're going against the nature of his animal soul right some people don't i don't know how to say it people like to eat sand they're pretty it says the sun personally sand they're ill right people don't understand it doesn't taste good it's not their nature to eat it people's natures give them certain tendencies certain proclivities certain leanings says entangled that the jewish nature is called shade me shading it's a jewish animal and an aveda he has no desire to do an aveda it's against his nature of his animal soul the animal soul of ahid wants to enjoy whatever pleasure is permitted has no desire to enjoy pleasure which is prohibited and if he does it and in the countries if it's true that the nature of the animal the animal soul of neph it doesn't want to do an aveda it's how people do have vedas in the first place if it's in other words animals don't kill more than their natures i mean i'm going to throw this in parenthetically even though it creates more of a problem than it sounds there are certain foods that are not healthy like like things that have concentration of sugar and other things like that people indulge in that all the time and i'm not a big maybe in nutrition but one of the things that i understand is when you eat unhealthy food you have unhealthy appetite people who eat sugar and bleached flour again i'm not amazed with these things overeat because it creates an unnatural craving about the nature of the body is if you eat healthy when you're fully satisfied if you eat unhealthy foods besides the fact that those foods are unhealthy it messes with your appetite and you begin to eat more than you need to and it causes all kinds of illnesses that amam writes that most death that i'm not right that most death is rooted in eating too much food i said rice okay so if you will go to an animal and give it food that's unhealthy to it whatever animal food is sugars and so on and so forth and it tastes good most animals will not eat it only primates only monkeys and higher primates will eat food that gives them pleasure even if it's destructive and you see now of course you're going to start saying okay so that means that they have such tickle free will i i don't have an answer to that question i'm just observing that by animals you see bamakrish and most animals they eat what is naturally healthy for them to eat and if it's not healthy they won't eat it on the other hand when they need certain things there are stories with travel animals traveling hundreds of miles because they're missing salt on their diet to go to a soul clique it's a it's amazing to see the way animals compensate for their dietary needs but by nature they eat what they need in the amounts that they need it and they don't eat unhealthy foods huh some animals eat food that is very low nutrition and not good for them well they have no options not true oh come on the panda it's a carnivore but it only eats bamboo because it can't hunt it's lost its instincts there's a big scientific question where do you put pandas there they have they have carnivore teas they have carnivore stomachs but they don't have carnivore reflexes they're very slow don't think catches an occasional cane wrap they should be eating meat but they can't catch it so you wonder i shouldn't say a bad word in a show yeah how did such a how did evolution allow for something like this to happen right and by the way elephants also eat enormous amounts of food because they digest a very small portion of the food that they take in because they don't have the kind of stomachs that you would need to digest the kind of food that they eat so they still made some animals that they have to eat inefficiently but that's not the same thing as eating unhealthy it's not the same thing anyway point well taken so the rebel asks if it's against the nature of a person to do an aveda how do people do evade us all together and the rebel says what the your mother says it's the kuntus of mine aleph i think but the mother says the nature of the aids that's not such a big deal you can do you can enjoy this it's not an invader and tamar tells you enjoy this there's a lot of different interpretations to this mother one of the interpretations is the it's a harder comes to read and says enjoys vladimir enjoy permitted pleasures eat lots of food a lot of tasty food spend so much of your time in your mind that you can be used for higher things than indulging in foods and other physical pleasures and the rabbit hashab says when you indulge in enough taivas hit it if you indulge in enough permitted typists you slowly lose your sensitivity and you literally slip and slide from heter into issue says the only way you can explain that person can do an aveda considering the fact that it's against the teva of his nephesh bahamas because you have to lose your hush you lose your hush slowly by by much indulgence this is the first concept of rue that i wanted to speak to now that's from tanya pedras the second kante russo i want to speak to was taking the country i don't know how many of you have read the essay on valley i don't know why they're called foul they should call it idiocy or stupidity i know it's not a nice name for my mercury's but that's exactly what it doesn't mean it means idiocy stupidity yeah yeah family is a word that they most people don't know it sounds so so flaky it sounds so innocent so innocuous or theoretical and i understand why you can't call the book an essay on stupidity but that's exactly what kunta subhan is it's a stupidity kuntu so mayan is predicated on one idea of one idea and to use a fancy word it's the nephesha sichlas not never bahamas i spoke about that before we have an intellectual soul intellectual is not godly intellectual soul is not sacrificial not the intellectual's not about mercedes never-ish but the intellectual soul is a logical soul it's a sale of logic or to say it in different words intellectual soul is objective it's truly theoretical and observes things he's able to understand what they are without any leaning the rabbi has a secret where he argues he brings right from the dinner of the shepherd mrs manil good to see but the second concept of we have intellectual assault our intellectual soul says logic dictates that a person has to be efficient efficient means he has to use everything he has in the ma in the most effective way which means my time should be used for more meaningful things rather than less meaningful things my habits should be refined and uplifted goes through a series of he starts off with food then he moves on to clothing then he moves on to music and to art then he moves on to emotions and he moves on to ideas then he moves on to potato ideas and then he finally moves on to this and the rebel says logic says logic says objective cold logic says that if i can be involved i can live my life where my priority is that logic says if you could dedicate your life to learning yes and you you choose the lesser wisdom this concept of students is not in the level of the bahamas not because of the person on the animal soul it's the against the seiko common sense dictates if i could choose a path of life which would be for example and i'm sorry for saying this i may be offensive to some people i can become a culinary artist like become a cook or i can become a great musician and i choose to dedicate my life to cooking whether it's music of course in america the meaning is you do what you feel like and what you would like but logic dictates that that's a choice of if i could have chose a higher profession and i chose a lower profession that's called if i could have chosen the professionals to do with the arts or a profession for example jewish psychology which is a higher profession i choose the arts over psychology it's considered if i could have chosen them professionally with the heart or the mind or toyota so the argument in the kunta somalian is i'll get you in a second the argument's mine is that secret alone dictates that you shouldn't choose a lesser thing over a higher thing this is the second title the countries of mine doesn't speak about the bahamas only he speaks about the nevisha sickness in other words when i could indulge in something higher and i choose something lower it's logically stupid because it makes it's logically preferred that i choose a higher profession like that famous story with driver i'm not going to tell you the story about where a man came to the deb and said he graduated from shiva university and his choices were to become a psychologist to become an educator and the rebbe said go into education because psychology has a bias towards illness and education allows you to make people healthy that they're not going to need a psychologist in the first place he did not listen to the rabbi and then many many many years later he disclosed that perhaps the river was right you have to choose the highest thing that you could use because i'll pee psychologically that's the preferred choice and any choice of the contrary goes into the category it's the second concept it's not against the teva of the nephew what makes sense [Music] like where's the safety come from you're not born with state quality like you know you develop safety you know you bring things into yourself unless you don't what is that so what you're saying is you object to the phenomena of objectivity yeah okay i i i actually i'm inclined to lean in your direction it's an argument against the whole secular world's obsession with that they're being objective but trader disagrees titus says there is an objective soul and the objective soul measures things against each other without a bias without me in being involved what is it keeping like what is it judging based on where does it get where does it get its rules from where the object gets rules from so this is a fantastic question that's way beyond the scope of this conversation and probably the correct answer is i'm not prepared to answer that question but there are certain simple laws of logic that are undeniable laws of logic and one of them is that something higher and something more meaningful is superior to something lower and something less meaningful it's a logical law and that's what the the issue is in the beginning of mine when he presents you with this hierarchy of choices in terms of a path in life okay well that's a very legitimate fear go ahead remember to send this for sure entity but there's no doubt in the mimo and i think there's even sources written the phoenix ever writes about the laboratory it's a separate soul three souls right and it's fascinating because it's it's a soul without a bias a soul without any leaning you never shall bahamas is leaning towards ruach he wants to have pleasure they never show the kiss is by nature disposed towards mercedes objective logic strict logic is there someone that says like whichever the nebraska bahamas as the foreign would say as i told you about 16 seconds ago in the my mortum it's clear in the late of my mormon and there are three differences i i the point that you're making i spent many many years convincing myself of until i could no longer convince myself of it because it's explicit in my mottom but it's not in tanya it's not entirety speaks huh no he mentioned a whole different beast why because the neshama's nature habit listen carefully the neshama's nature is to sacrifice itself for the american then trauma is nature is the sacrifice of you having to tell you two different teva the animals nature is he wants to indulge in pleasure he just doesn't want to cross certain lives the divine soul's nature is sacrifice the never the expression is the godly soul of a junior the witches to you is capable of concept the never is a servant he's in the state of mesidis nevertheless and when a person indulges in aveda he's doing against the nephilim kiss the nervous of the kids wants to sacrifice itself and they stay the decision to be a menace in chapter 24 that the fact that a person says this aveda will never do this not so bad is also a part of the decides what's important to themselves and what's not important so what i just presented was three different three different scientists there's a sight to go against nature of animal soul there's a sight that go against your logical soul and there's a saita even if she's not going against her animal soul even she's not going against her logical soul she's going against the tava of her new shabbat to be mason never should do what the amish there wants and the amy she doesn't want this maybe she doesn't want this so those are three ways of understanding them the inundate and you could make the argument it's right there's three different personalities it's inside the you can look at it both ways but certainly the idea that if shabbat says tava does not include naveda is a radical tradition i want to share with you another idea okay there is called a man being alone with a woman one man and woman and lester father and daughter mother and son or brothers and sisters brothers and sisters cousins is [Music] one man with two women or with three women if you're dealing with people who don't have proper standards of sneeze the lockers of yogurt could be many people this is going to upset you and make you get excited and start hooting and hollering and disturbing my recording says that with a there's a presumption of homosexuality there's a presumption of homosexuality in other words a man with a man if they're not sanua in other words some people say well only certain people have a proclivity towards homosexuality according to every single human being every single human being if the circumstances were right has a leaning toward this indian and that's why part of the demon of yehuda is a man and a man being alone and he shows that in many dormitories they threatened a lot to people in a room that the doors of the classrooms have to have windows it's not just because we're worried about being sued there is dynamic yield under certain conditions between a man and a man also but wait but wait but wait i want to make something very clear the dining of years ago in two categories with a married woman and with a single lady with a pneumonia who lived 400 years and teaching the jewish people he made the gazeta to be alone with a single girl a single boy with a single girl the original the more basic is a married woman this is where we're more strict this is more concern and that's the foundation of satan the foundation of saita is it is an isa so it is more than that i want to make it clear so it is more than the fact that she's a married woman she's not allowed to be alone with a man sayita is where her husband says altissasri i don't trust you with him don't with this particular man out don't be alone with him i see you're too friendly he's too friendly you get along very well it's better in the gym i would like to propose that when a man says to his wife altitude planey who he is determines whether his kino is if the man is himself not the eight or the person and he has his own injury on him in his own head and because of that he has sasha's against his wife that's called his desire to his fear of his wife being alone when the man comes from tomorrow but if a person if the man is very anal and he himself is removed from sachin and he's mcconnell so then i think that that's the shot that is he so far removed from such a possibility so he's telling this to his wife because he wants to keep her away from sachin young as well okay but there's a critical secondary part to the all the halachus of satan which is the dinum of okay and again the dynamic go back to the beginning of the torah sata is more than yiken because satan is the case of altitude it's a long time ago with gaze to be alone with a single girl and as i said you before that if you're living amongst people and americans but the western world is very perverse you could argue that would apply even if you have two or three girls or more with one or two or three men if if they don't have shame from one another it's very simple if they're comfortable enough to behave you know it's inappropriate in front of one another the lockers of the plot and i just want to say one thing and in conclusion then i'll let you make your observations and your comments is a good idea there's a famous his name is billy graham i don't think he's alive anymore billy graham was a galach he was one of the most respected in america he swore in many presidents that's how i know about reverend billy graham every president in my lifetime i mean i remember nixon i remember carter and i remember reagan the gala who would stand up there on the stage and hold the bible was billy graham every election billy graham was the reverend billy graham would not be alone with a woman he would not be alone with a woman he doesn't have a locker i don't know if he learned the mother maybe he did ye would make sense when it comes to cousins that you pointed out the boys will save you so many possible hormones you know you're with a person and you're enjoying yourself and i'm i'm just letting you know that when you say to yourself listen i'd love to spend time with you but i have to walk out in the street you can't be alone in the house you have no idea says you're not a bad person sometimes you drank a little too much too much wine sometimes you became a little bit too childish and too frivolous sometimes you had bad friends and one thing led to another as the expression is and therefore be mega made and we shouldn't be guided that we shall erase hashem's name which is really really a good idea and even if you're not the biggest framak and the biggest saddik it is good advice for a man and a woman who worked together for example to be alone today in the workplace it's so hard because in a work environment you spend your best hours of your day not with your spouse with your co-workers and if your co-worker is a woman and she's smart and she dresses up for go to work your wife doesn't dress up when you come up at night the tests that they face especially if they travel together are unbel are not fair they're not reasonable and everybody keeps on saying yeah you have choice it's really not true it would be a good idea besides for the sexual harassment issues person for the sake of the family that people in a work environment should be a little bit more formal and a little less friendly even this whole idea that it's only social and we're enjoying each other's company and we're fabrega in the in the in the in the middle what they call it in the middle ages they called it the courtly love it's just flirtation it's not innocent it's not innocent of yehuda are very very one of the few ideas in title which is kind of hard especially in our world to say why the rabbi so strict it makes sense and you you will be much better off even if you're not the biggest sadik if you're particular in other words you talk to a girl don't be alone with her ever especially at night how many years you think is there is even stronger or more worse with the marriage yeah of course being a married woman is worse of course yeah of course so you go to a public place the rebbe spoke about using a taxi driver right so you're traveling alone a boy and a girl alone in a car in a dark neighborhood it's a challenge rebbe spoke about there being lady taxi drivers that the women are traveling alone should not travel with a man at night [Music] but it's dark it depends where you're traveling did i best spoke about this and never spoke about it because it ever knows he needs to talk about it that should be women taxi drivers in crown heights all the union and the others went and got lady taxi drivers uh because they never spoke about women traveling women around the loan at night they mentioned ramona it's the shuttle of it is the shuttle from there's another fascinating thing about sauter and that is soyta is a suffolk day rice i'm not a london god knows i'm not allowed this unfortunately i wish i was a go on and tater but men are tighter there's really no spaces nothing in the suffix it's either loud or not a lot either right or wrong where do you have a suffolk madeira right to the famous rama there was a suffolk there is where is the case entitled where you have in the homish a din based on the suffix a sata and what's weird about it is the halachus of suffolk by into a public place and there's a shiloh where i became thomas or not suffolk and you have fakers upon say you make them up on makeup and make if i'm in somebody's private possession house and as a child if i touch the tomah suffolk this is applies to torment and to thomas is in a private domain if i'm not sure if i became tamiya in the public minute if i'm not sure i became tommy and we learned these from sata then now by a sight of the word tum is used in a different way right it's not thomas because she touched the shadows her navel too because even though uh but this is not when it says that a saita becomes thomas mamish we have a suffolk and it is fascinating and interesting and i'm sure there's many i mean logically the explanation is because if you're in a public place people could see you and they fly private people that couldn't see you so there's a greater possibility in our veda but you could say perhaps you're in the ambitious domain you're a domain which belongs to everybody suffering when you're in the abyss there's domain the standard is higher when you're in hashems everyday has an owner and the that owner got his authority from the abridged himself that's how ownership works ownership is not because i used a sword or a knife and i took it from you gave it to me so every private domain the ibishi gives to an individual person they should sort of speak a shutfest in the establishment so i'm just saying it's she's not it means the men of god in the main of god there's a higher standard and if you're not sure you assumed okay but this is a fascinating thing and again if we had more time and i was better prepared you could go into a whole lump this with the the difference in suffix this is the only case in the entire homicide where there's a mitzvah associated with an uncertainty now of course to say there was if a man was makhan in the ishta he warned about the sausage place along with that person and he went anyway and there's no adhetive there's a.d tomorrow there's no inner chaser right or if she's my death the woman says i didn't aveda i if she admits i didn't have aida the alohas were that they were not they didn't they didn't do the whole ceremony of saito she gave him he gave her a get and she loses her sub okay that's the din and we're not going to let her marry the man with whom she claimed to have done the aveda because sometimes the whole trick is that she wants to get out of her marriage because she wants to marry the other guy um so the aloha has decided to apply we don't know she's denying it he doesn't know for sure but because he warned her and there were eight days steeda the witnesses who saw her be alone in the room for a certain amount of time if you remember the gemara the whole bunch of is how much time that is so then he has to bring it to the base of mikdash and she has to bring a carbon and there's a whole say to what they did with her and part of that i hate to say it was they did things to humiliate her to embarrass her and they wanted other women to see to warn them that they should not follow her example and they wrote a magilla is it good or absolutely happening not that i know of us satan they wrote a megillah there's different days what the mcgill is the magillah had hashem's name on it many times the whole savior always the curses that if you sinned so then you you're going to drink this water and it's going to go into your stomach and you're going to have plots you're going to blow up and if you did not sin then it's going to be nothing at all like the expression is if you put salt on an open wound it hurts if you put salt on skin which is fine it's nothing it doesn't have any effect so they tell her if he didn't do the aveda drink the word of the satan if you did do the aveda don't drink it because it's like better it's going to have a certain ill effect on you and you don't want that to happen and they write a magilla and then comes a very critical part and they add to the water and the they would erase the ink from the parchment of the magilla into the mega morim they would add a bitter herb to make it push it bitter and then she would drink it one of the big things about satan is hashem because they erased hashem's name of the worst of vades in the tata is raising hashem's name hashem as you know right the mother says that kappa until foreign and one of the simplest version of hashem is to wantonly erase hashem's name you're not allowed to erase hashem's name if you have a safety and one of the letters of hashem's names or any of the seven names becomes possible and you can't fix it you're not allowed to erase it you have to cut it out paste other piece apartments on the back and write over the name you're not allowed to allow the edison to erase the name of a college but you're not allowed to do it and they say to this woman we have a megillah it has hashem's name many times if if you didn't do the aveda get into hate but if it did the aveda tell the truth not only tell the truth that you shouldn't die tell the truth he shouldn't be guided that the amish's name is being erased in vain and this is a significant part of the sata narrative is that there's this process called and the consequence of this is as follows there's a very big difference between before they race the mcgill and after before they race them it gives a lot of leniencies there's a lot of opinions of the sage how it's done the carbon and the writing and the erasing and the drinking there's a lot and and the curse the cry not the reader a whole curse there's different sheets about what to say that was but one of the clear criteria in satan is that there's a very big difference between before they raise the mcgill and after once they erase the megillah they force her to drink unless she says out and out then they don't but otherwise they they because it's but of course the other side of that hashem is the famous idea that the amish says as we all know and you've heard this a hundred times that ish and isha is right the man is asian the woman is ash but with the man you have the urine with the woman you have a hay together it's the amish's name so every married couple is i'll tell you parenthetically that ebb's father was at off the blade because made it all the pale and when the jew is holy and as spiritual as a blade because he suffers a lot of ill things because abundant have to do what has to be done and some of the things that abundantly have to do for people who study kabbalah it's very hard and one of them is to write a get the blavik wrote kitten he didn't write the get himself he had a savior i didn't get that writing again is a complicated process but on a day that their believe it was masada yet he fasted and he was in a terrible mood all day long didn't require professional atheists the hunters bring stuff like by condition you know you bring two people off the street as long as they're ashamed of shabbos and they're not related to the host of culture one another could be ages for a get you have to it he wasn't sitting down he was leaning and leaving the blade shouted at him we're destroying the name of god which is the ultimate and you're resting a divorce is the destruction of the name of god so the bishop says my name by erasing the word the the megillah of the saita to for the effect of shaolin bias because you're going to save the marriage if she's not going to die she goes back to her husband it's going to be proven that she was not misana she goes back to her husband first of all i don't have time second of all emotional questions and pasha sata are impossible to even begin to address beginning with the fact that i started to share with that the whole pastor seems to be focusing on the sin of women even though every time a woman does an aveda she did it with a man so i i for those two reasons and maybe or more reasons but just going to have to leave that alone it's life is complicated that history is complicated and everything is complicated so leave it alone but it may have been good faith she may be a tadekis so this is the idea on the one hand you tell her if you didn't aveda at the mitzi shouldn't be on the other hand the amish that says let's desecrate my name for the purposes of shalom bayes which is why the commander says brings in that if a woman drinks the waters of satan and she was the hater the nixon israel if she was childless she'll have children if she had difficulty in pregnancies of easy pregnancies if she had not such pretty children she'll have prettier children this the woman who was the sata after she drinks the water is not only that she's not not punished but there's an incredible incredible benefit that comes as a consequence of this and finally i want to finish with the music and that is understand that the saita is the jewish people and the husband of makkah is the hebrews now how could be by the irish did an uncertainty and uncertainty bishop knows everything it's of course it's very difficult to answer that question but part of the answer to that question is when a person does something wrong like abhimaila the gabe davis did it's only innovative if it's done on purpose be amazing and the whole dinner of the mcconnell ishta is that we're not sure what her condition is so the dinnum of sata are where the jewish people kayaking are suspect the jewish people are accused of rahman al-assad doing something they're not supposed to do and because they're suspect their relationship with the americans is complicated and the ambitious says i'm going to erase my name to ascertain what was the kavanagh and he erases the name of hashem and the khala the jewish people drink the satan water and they don't die and they renew their bond with abhished as a result of this there's an increase in child and bias between yiddin and the abhishek because it's determined that the yiddin never did naver there's a story that i'm going to tell you parenthetically that her might of rabbi ruben all of a sudden who was accused of a crime accused of innovating they didn't know for sure if he had done that away they had to be fired from the street it couldn't be ashamed if he hadn't done their video was the big idea and they didn't know for sure so they came to the to their debate and the oldest hassan with great trepidation and they turned to the child and said but we have a suspicion on a particular hazard that maybe he did maybe the rebel will look into him and see if he did naveda so they tried to get out but looked at this old hustle looking straight in the eyes and said maybe i'll examine you to see what kind of avedas you committed and as the story goes that's the end of the story that's the end of the story the passion saita ends with the nyx of nizrazora there's a suspicion of like the story of the igloo azov and then it turns out it's only the aid of the nyx of an israel zora yiddin do not do avedas on purpose a yid cares about the relationship with the habitat and it looks like maybe this kid doesn't care whether it's because of ruachtos or whatever reason then she drinks the water to the seitan and it's determined that she's tahereh and she's potatoes and when your husband is god then there's god and there's a suspicion you're very happy to go back in i just want to finish with a word that zalman shakhtar said that he was in france in the south of france and there was a buddha of bachelor it was during the war they were under the nazi occupation and it was dangerous they gathered at night to learn bahrain and the rebel walked in and and they had a to learn that day because of hamisha maybe it was like they decided they started to learn they're going to make us they never walked in and they never asked them what they're doing and they didn't know who he was and they told him that because that's a maya they're making a fabregat in the regular shade in limu so they never asked them and what are you learning says the best in satman the insurgent if there's going to be shells thursday morning she goes into the basement the yamahe means the fourth millennium between the year 3001 the year four thousand yidden as a basula as a virgin as a perfect u.s marries the amish and the elephant in the fourth millennium would have come in amman gets married on thursday because then on monday given yama thursday friday and chavez amanda doesn't have a widow doesn't have seven days to shove she has only three thursday friday in shabbos so they get married on thursday so the rebbe says the basula gets married on wendy means the fourth millennia and now mona means when the hidden are in the state of being a widow so they can imagine the ambition the fifth millennium four thousand one and the year five thousand what's that doesn't die this is what says her husband is alive but she doesn't know where he is she's a naguna she's called a living widow this is the lord the distance between yiddin and the abyss that is greater is great because even though they're still married in her mind she's a widow because she doesn't know where her husband is and then they never continued and then there's a third scenario and that is a master guru a man was married to a woman and he's not a coyote and he divorced her there's a special mitzvah that he should remarry her and this is uh on friday and friday has been the sixth millennium and when he told the story he said when the rebbe got to this part of the vartas absolutely got married in the year the fourth millennium yidnas and i wanna get married the first he started to cry and when the devil cried and he didn't want to show that he was crying he would cough so he never coughed to cover up the fact that he was crying he would find out later when he would listen to the devil for being the never wanted to cry was going to cry he wanted to hide it so he would start to cough and this is also connected to the partial shater the sata is a head and her husband is the habit and the end is that it's been determined the nixa the woman is proven the jewish people are proven to be taher loyal every single yid's name begins with a yud or a haitian are holy and perfect and wonderful even though this is a suspicion and the aversion is and the abrasives desecrates his name to make solemn isla ishta the okay [Music]