Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
The Rav on Parshat Bereishit | Rabbi Dr. Aaron Adler | October 7 2026
117 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Welcome back. Hope everybody had a uh
very happy sim
yam of season. Today is October 7th and
the country is going through a type of
yumpt of sheni of the yoma khon uh which
took place nationally by the government
two days ago which was the Hebrew date
and I believe they correctly
appointed the date not the English date
October 7th even though that's what's
you know sitting in our heads because
October 7th can come out on in yumpt of
time and it's just inappropriate to do a
yama zikaron the event as we remember
three years ago happened on Shabbat
where you're not going to have a on so
and the day after is and islam
so they established that it'll be the
24th of tre two days after
and you know the government rang its
various programs uh throughout the
country the families decided to do their
own u yoma zikon on the English date
exactly what's going to happen in future
years uh when October 7th comes out
smack in the middle of Sukkot which will
be next year um I don't know I don't
know how it's going to work but at least
we do know that there are many
ceremonies uh this afternoon this
evening and I'll give some uh reference
to it in this year as well so first of
all as usual the Wednesday shirim here
at the program in Mavia of the OU in
memory of Danil bin Davidid and Ibraham
Strauss and Morbin Moshe and Raziel but
Yseph Marcus parents of Julia Marcus and
Alir continues to be in memory of
Alvim Zap.
So after two years of u
dealing with the put kodesh the he what
they called in the Torah tidbits holy
poetry people didn't know what in world
I was talking about and I said it was
mirror you know we did we did other pim
of kinote and whatever um little
changing gears for this year um and that
is we're to do some of the very very
very insightful uh thoughts of great
rabbet on parata shavua. uh today we
already are equipped with a full set in
English of an and it's an anthology
basically of the ro's talks on various
sections of parat shabu from the band
the end of this was not available I
think the first time I actually dealt
with this subject of the on parat shabua
over 20 years ago um and I wasn't even
sure if it was at the Israel center
whatever it was uh somewhere
But um at that point there were various
articles available and you had to sit
and you had to call the articles. Today
you can sit with the it's an U
publication U press publication a very
nicely done Arnold Lustiger a very very
fine person from New Jersey edited the
whole series and what they did was he
had in front of him so many sources that
are available today where the roof said
something about a particular puk on the
Torah and they just put it one by one
according to the order of the humish. So
you have a humish and rashi in front of
you and then you have the RV. So it
looks like the ro perouch the roof never
sat and wrote a perouch. He never wrote
a commentary on the Torah except they
had something to say about so many
different sukim that they were able to
put it together in book form of the ro's
edition of the Torah. So today we're
going to um deal with paratit.
But uh I did remember that when I looked
at a source page that I had prepared
years ago on the subject um that the one
who really put it together in sheer form
very very concisely was somebody who was
autis
I'm talking about Rabbi Avishi David and
Rabbi Aishi David who lives in Bish I
believe he's a raul and he also was the
head of the program the YU new program
at um the group center um you should I
think it's called Torah Shrager there
right Torah Shrager so so there is such
a one American program
sponsored by it's at the U it's at the G
center at Wu in Ga Morai so a very very
fine Tamil Kam and a very very fine
person and he put out a safer several
years ago called D ro d ro Y ro dash y
is a play on the word ro dash mochet
from parhati and here obviously he's
talking about the so he called it the ro
dash and it's it's basically
it's um halttic shirim that the put
together but when the r spoke homalytics
he was talking is which we just
translate for lack of a better term
Jewish philosophy but you hear the word
philosophy so o this is heavy this is
not For me this is, you know, Aristotle
and uh No, no, no, no, no. When the Ro
spoke Ashkafa, it was Dush. It was it
was alive. It was alive and well very
much so. Um and um he capsulated in in
the what he writes for
um the the essence of uh some of the
very very very important ideas of if you
may why a kadoshu created the world and
what exactly no small question obviously
it's a challenge just to think about it
uh this safer which came out originally
in English was translated into Hebrew uh
under the same name so it's now
available already in two languages. Um
so let's let's take a look at the first
source. The first source
I I'll given you first of all just the
headlines of of what we're looking at
here. Um the the first idea
obviously we talk about briatan creation
of the world we're talking about yesesh
means something from nothing right
is is a is a Latin phrase the idea that
it's uh there was nothing there before
this is something that Jewish philosophy
had was challenged by Greek philosophy
because there were those of course who
just didn't believe in a creator
Aristotle did believe in a creator
except he believed that
God created the world but from material
that existed eternally as well. So
that's not something the Ram would go
along with. Obviously on a philosophical
level
did not create the world from existing
material. The material was created and
before that material was created there
was nothing. It's hard for us to imagine
what is called nothing. It's very hard.
Very hard. So much so the Ram had to
deal with an interesting midrash. He
deals with it in the perplex
med took shell snow from under the
cavode under his throne and created the
world almost suggesting that there was
some material there that became the
basis of the created world. So the Ram
deals with that too. And Rama believes
that much of what the Torah talks about
in terms of language,
the Torah expresses itself in the
vernacular that human beings are capable
of understanding. But if you really
think about it, God doesn't have a hand.
There's no he doesn't have a finger.
There's no and even when God gets angry,
that anger is not human anger. And the
Ram falls out back to the
You know, God's thought and and God's
actions are not to be compared to human
thought and human action. Nevertheless,
nevertheless, there is something that we
nurture from ways. And that's why there
is a mitzvah in the Torah. It's found
late in the Torah.
You shall follow his ways. So, so there
the ways isn't what you put on in the
car to get somewhere, right? It's ways
is to figure out the
relates to human beings in this world.
So the classic line of
just like he is compassionate, you
should be compassionate and and and we
learn about through the Torah, how he
reveals himself to the human situation
and the created world. So that's what
we're supposed to be uh copying as much
as humanly possible and live that type
of life where it says kadosh
is the source of the kadusha and we are
to become sacred people and what does
that mean? It means to invite a kadosh
into this created world because what a
kadosh did and I'll always say that is
if to say because again we human we're
using human words now and it's very
difficult to use human words when it
comes to butul created the world and
then stepped back he stepped back and
left that created world empty of his
presence but what he wanted is that
human beings should invite God's
presence back into this world that is
called the act of kadusha. Every single
expression of kadusha and if you want to
know how many there are take a look at
lickenstein's one of his last books was
about kadusha the the the how kadusha
forms in this world and it's just a very
sensational uh halic treaties on the
world on the world in the world of
kadusha and and what that's all about
but the word kadosh which also means
separate and also means prohibited
because when something is kadosh.
There's usually some prohibitions that
go along for the ride. Kadur is the
source of that being kadosh. Kadoshim to
you. You are obliged to become kadosh.
So it's interesting that some of those
who counted mitzvot include kadoshim to
you as one of the 613 mitzvot. And the
Rambam doesn't. He says that's not a
mitzvah. That's everything. That's
everything. If you want to know what
what you're supposed to be doing during
life, you're supposed to be inviting
into this world. So every time we
perform a mitzvah
to do such and such, just doing a
mitzvah means that you're responding to
the the command of God and therefore
that which commanded and now you're
performing it in this world, you have
brought a kadu into the picture. So
that's what a mitzvah. And what about
just taking an apple and eating it?
You've acknowledged that created the
trees and the trees give off the fruits
and now you're eating it. So the garam
is going to tell us and this is going to
be important for the continuation here
that if you eat something without a bra,
you're a thief. You're a thief. Why are
you a thief? Because owns the whole
world. He created the world. So he owns
the world. And you have to just ask
permission. Just ask permission and then
you can partake in the pleasures of the
world. And asking permission doesn't
just mean that the the the balabayat the
owner of the tree and the fruits says
all right go ahead and go eat it. What
you've done is you've actually brought
some kaduca down to this world through
the apple. uh the one who the ones who
really really uh magnified this were the
cabalists which then were adopted by
where does the whole shirion come from
where the rebba makes a braha on the
kougal and then every you know is going
to die just to get a little morsel of
the kougal so why is that so I I
guarantee you some of the aren't even
aware of what this whole concept was all
about although I assume that many are
aware of it that if the rebba said
Abraham on the cougal then now there's
divinity in the cougal. So by you eating
that kougal you're also inspired by that
measure of uh of divinity. If you're
laughing you're a litak you're you're a
snagot. I got
>> they think
the rebi
>> Yeah.
>> They think the divinity is in the
>> No. No. If you think the divinity is the
rebi try the Catholic church. That's not
us. Right. You should know without any
joking around one of the serious
objections of the vagin
of of of
was the use of the intermediary between
a kadosh and Israel. He was
diametrically against it. And uh that
became the the the the the uh heart and
soul of of a vodatem in the context of
aidic rebi for sure because the balmtov
was of the opinion that the destruction
of the second mikdash caused a type of
blockade to all of our and there was
even a basis for this in sati in the
third chapter of
there's no longer a possibility to dav
so why bother
you know, offering a so the response of
the was that it's called a piggyback.
You you you you bring your to the rebba
who has enormous spiritual powers to get
over to leap over that blockade. So you
need him to shle your over that vner
didn't like this whole thing. Okay. Beda
but getting back. So now let's just take
a look at that source first source on
the page. It's actually the very opening
number of the Rambam's Mishnet Torah,
the opening number of his 14 volume
encyclopedic work on
the most fundamental of all fundamentals
and the pillar of wisdom
that is to know.
There was an there is an original being.
There is an original being means
everything else is afterwards. There's
nothing that comes before some uh re
those who look for illusions in the
Torah. So you know the first letter in
Torah is a bet.
It looks like it's an enclosure. It's
like an upside upside
and that's how you write the bet. Which
means from from here we start talking.
There's nothing before. There's nothing
before the bet. The bet is the first
thing that we we have to understand. The
bet
that there is an original being. And
just take note of the first four words
and it's abbreviation. It's he vav and
hey, right? The shame.
Now, there's a cabalistic custom to
begin with with four words that spell
out Hashem. It's cababalistic. The last
thing in the world we're going to accuse
the Rambam was employing a cabalistic uh
ploy or or tactic or style. I I heard
this from
who said that
is 100%.
There's zero kabala. And then he stopped
and he said, "I have to think about the
first four words." He says, "It could be
it could be an accident." You know, it's
a literary accident.
>> A coincidence. It could be. Yeah.
>> Manny several weeks ago recommended
recommended English translation
written by Rabbi Don Franco. He
recommended it very much. So I I bought
it and I really started getting
excellent in the He basically says that
as we know it was handed down uh you
know to students who
he writes he says that the himself says
that the was not to be in the chain of
>> okay one thing is clear he does not
speak of mysticism in the sense of an
organized system like the ramban did the
ramban's not much later than the ramban
like this less than 100 years later the
Ramban is a cabalist and the Ramban
obviously studied cabola by others and
the Rambans from Spain so whether the
Rambam was acquainted or not it's hard
for me to say but we can say is as let's
say it you can trust him there's there's
no kabala in the Mishna of the Rama no
reference to it at all and uh he doesn't
speak about it in the he speaks about
philosophy
and metaphysics, but it doesn't speak
about
mysticism at all. But it's interesting
that you have here
we have the use of the
indish Friday night where we the minute
was to say
before
as a preamble to kdesh and the cabalist
of the 13th century said to start with
which spells out the letters
and you have came.
So did they think that this was or was
it a coincidence? Whatever. Anyway,
it is the fundamental of fundamentals
and the pillar of wisdom to know that
there is an original being.
The Ram does not use the word to
believe.
He says to know. Knowing is something
that's cognitive and knowing is
something that you have to strive to
know something. You have to learn. It's
a learning process. It's a cognitive
feature of human beings to know that
there was an original being. We're going
to see in a few minutes that there is
another text of the Rambam that precedes
the the Mishna
where which was not written in Hebrew.
It's written in Judeo-Arabic which was
the Rambam's Yiddish where in some of
the early prints the word is to believe.
And the question is did the Ram actually
write that? We'll get to it in a second.
And then he says
who
means everything that exists is because
he brought it out. Mi is a very
interesting word. He brought it out.
Everything that is already brought out
was brought out by him. capital H
and everything that was exists now from
heaven and earth
and anything between
is a derivative of the truth of his
existence which means if God didn't
exist the world doesn't exist very
simple very simple so item number one is
that there was a created world and the
creation was from nothing item number
two is that the created world kadosh
bahu didn't stop with the act of
creation but there's a perpetual
sustaining of that act if a kadosh bahu
would have created the world and then
retired go to early retirement the world
would revert back to to vavo to
nothingness the um the fact that the
world exists kadesh continues to want
the world to exist
So the continuation of the will of the
of the world to exist is the very reason
that we're sitting here today that we're
still around. So that's called mamsi.
When we take a look at source number
two, we have an interesting midrash raba
about a philosopher. So sometimes kazal
will talk about philosophers philosoph.
They'll talk about philosopher and talk
about Greek philosopher. Here the had to
deal with serious people who were
thinkers. Sometimes the khazal will talk
about minim but there talking about
usually early Hebrew Christians. So
they're talking theology with the minim
here a philosopher comes over and asks
Rabbi Guml one of the Tanim Rab Gum he
is from Yavna
Amar
elim your God was an amazing architect
right the word say in modern Hebrew
might be an artist but here an architect
and Ella Matalo Samimulo
he found uh raw materials that worked
for him. He had an arsenal of raw
materials. Amarlo
said, "Yeah, what were these raw
materials?" Theim that he used he said
to
ruote
all these words in the first paracet
wind water darkness
took all these things and put it all
together nicely and it created it made
the world or let's say he developed the
world. This is what this philosophical
belief that developed the world using
materials that existed
response
that's an insulting comment by the way
[laughter]
a very very insulting comment um
literally pardon the expression it's
like telling somebody why don't you drop
dead basically was telling him so you're
not worth anything
By all of those,
the Torah uses the word bet alf and bet
according to means
the creation that didn't exist. Nothing
existed beforehand. Yeah.
>> Who's that?
The Ramban actually uses the in his
pouch explains the difference between
Alf which is and
or
he says only means
and and all the other things means from
something from something
I don't remember that he said that the
world is what
he says clearly that brid
at the
one of the issues that took place at
2,300 years ago when 702
were invited from to come down to
Alexandria and translate the Torah to
Greek and this was the septtoim.
So they made some subtle changes. The
first one was the first they translated
elimit
God created the beginning because they
didn't want to stumble on an idea that
maybe it was a deity called who created
God. You can translate you can
mistransate that peso and sayim
there was a god called who created
Elohim. So they didn't want that to
happen. So they flipped it and they
translated Elohim.
The Ramban says that the word doesn't
mean as they translated in the King
James in the beginning. The bet is not
beet
but the word is and it means
the beginning of beginnings. That's what
the word brit means. It does not mean
init.
And and and and the reason the Ramban
says that and he says
the beginning the beginning as a noun
was created by a kadosh that's how he
translates
the beginning was created by kadosh but
it's not that the god forbid there's a
deity called
so here you have this little interchange
between the philosopher and rangl and
obviously putting his foot down and
saying that all this material this early
primal material
was all created by a kadosh and that was
then used by a kadosh to form everything
that pans out in the six days of
creation. If you look at um source
number three which takes us to the
seventh chapter of
here the Ram is going to talk about
prophecy. He's already he already talked
about the creation of the world and
creation of man and so on. Uh the point
of prophecy
one of the important fundamentals of our
religion to know
that God does communicate through the
medium called prophecy.
Braham is telling us the qualifications
of being an in case you were interested
in signing up for the school of
prophecy. So before you sign up, there
are some necessary prerequisites. You
have to be an outstanding
knowledgeable in all the sectors of
Torah. You have to have perfect perfect
character. Absolutely perfect character.
able to control yourself to to all kinds
of uh um yeah whatever. Um and and and
and then you are a candidate. If if you
achieve all that then you are a possible
candidate. Uh sometimes you might need
even training to receive to to achieve
that. Uh and that's why in Tanakh you
have this concept called bhanim.
It doesn't mean the children of Nvim. It
means the students of Nvim. And then one
particular case where
has a prime student um
thank you Ben and and he talks about
him. I think it's in the 45th chapter of
Sephra. He he
is is a wonderful student except decides
at the end of the day not to
you know to to conclude him into the
camp of prophets. So he never receives
prophecy and Yo tries to console him and
say look in my class you were topped and
it's not my fault that a kadosh didn't
come through. The one who argues what I
just said now was Rabud Levy in the
Kuzari. He believes that any Jew does
you don't have to be the you don't have
to do great top of the line. You have to
be a Jew who's a share to mitzvot and a
nice person and aid you know like many
people qualify a mench right many people
qualify
according to that but you had to have
been in the lineage the biological
lineage of Abraham which means converts
out converts out but you then could be
included in becoming a novi and ravi
believed that's why all of am heard
heard the first two
commandments at the har that's what says
and the raom doesn't buy this the raom
believes that you have to be of a
special highest caliber and only in the
elite heard the words
>> got to be like him
>> and the rest of them heard some sonic
boom of sorts that the only way they
able to interpret it was not a you know
an F35 fighter jet that went over your
head But that it must have been a divine
boom. So they were convinced that
existed which was really what's behind
the
god exists. Yeah.
I'll just add in
credit he was as
>> according to Rambam in this
there is there's a historical issue with
that but I'm fully aware of the fact
that in the
he places
between
and
this based on the wrote of of Rabba
said that there is indeed there's no
question is is an all-star there's no
question about that the question is he
didn't become a noi he doesn't become a
prophet right the reason why this is
important is because part of creation is
that a kad didn't let loose I mean the
ley actually in the kari uses the phrase
eloh abraham and eloh aristo the god of
abra the god of aristotle says the god
of aristotle without getting into the
question of pre uh you know existing uh
material for the creation of the world
but believed that after the creation of
the world kadesh bahul just took off and
and just is not around is not available
for communication even and does not
necessarily take an interest in what's
happening in the created world that's
how Aristole conceived God but the god
of Abraham is that a kadosh not only
created the world But it takes an active
interest in the world and is still
around and that legitimizes.
I mean obviously if not around to be
interested then and and the RA voice
harped on this that when the Torah says
is where is tuning out and it's the
greatest punishment the greatest
punishment is tunes out. It's not the
the particular I mean for example in
right
for for this reason I cry
I'm shedding tears
because you're you're away you're far
away I I can't communicate I can't get
close to you that's the the fact that
when is not with us he he lets you know
as we call it the Satan just reign
supreme and things happen and that's how
the that's how the understood the sha as
as as difficult as it is
just to place it into this box called
that's the his phrase it means total
absence of a kadu because if a kadu
would have been there on the scene how
could this happen how could this have
happened and and and and he uses the
Torah tells us that they're going to be
episodes of
just not being around but not being
around also means that he is around
occasionally or more than occasionally
and that's part of briatam It's it's
it's when man is out of line says, "All
right, you're not interested. I'm out."
You know, temporarily. It's temporary.
And that's we're going to read it next
week of of um of right
for a moment. I left you. Don't get the
wrong idea. This is not the Catholic
Church who claimed that the Brit the
covenant came to an end with the
destruction of first beta mikdash and
they start using perk nuniml as somewhat
of a source of the suffering servant as
they interpret it as but they should
just read chapter 54 just turn the page
and and see what actually says
it's the whole was a moment
in 1900 years can be a moment but it's a
moment. The idea of rea means temporary
the whole thing is temporary but is
involved very very involved with us and
that's part of the briata olam process
and then in source number four you have
the ram not restating but actually
stating before he writes the mishnet
tora the raom is about 30 to 32 years
old when he writes this his Mishna he
writes when he's 35 the book of mitzvot
which is a by his own admission a uh
preparatory work for the he wants to
have on the table the list of all the
613 mitzvah and the derivations from and
in the first mitzvah you don't have to
go far
again he's using the word here to
believe in the deity in the divinity
the this divine being is the reason for
all of other all other existence. Now I
have in brackets here and this is
important and I can tell you that from
the time that I printed this page 20
years ago uh a lot has surfaced to prove
uh how true Rafak was because he said
that in the standard text of the mitzvot
where Ram uses the word. The Ram never
used that word but he used an Arabic
word that translates.
See what I wrote there?
the great Yemenite
but as it says
just a half a year ago um a very serious
from who currently is the Russa
published his own version of the Rambam
sepha mitzvot and he himself also
translated the sepha mitzvot from the
Judeo Arabic and he concurs with
Rafkapak that the word that the Rambam
used here was dea
means knowledge. Amuna means faith and
faith generally means that you don't
have to prove it. You know children can
believe in something even though they
may not be able to prove it. So is our
yahhatud predicated upon faith. We
believe it because the BA said it and
she believed it and she succeeded in in
in in getting that amuna over to you as
well. Or is it something that you have
to struggle to be convinced that it's
true and then if then it's not amuna any
longer then it's day then then you
understand it you cognitively understand
it. Yeah.
>> But the first time uses that is intimacy
with yod as k. So is he including that
that intimate relation?
>> There's no question it's intimacy.
There's no question that the word yah
has something to do with intimacy. We
sometimes confuse uh uh emotion and
romance and so on with amuna but and ava
but that's not the way the raam saw it.
Rama saw a hashem as knowing God.
Knowing God. Ram wasn't into throwing
kisses to the safety or to the muza.
Contrary to popular opinion, right? The
Rammon believed it. You're supposed to
that's his line in the very end. It's
prop your is proportional to how much
you understand God's existence. That's
how we and it has to do with learning.
And by the way, the Ram believes that uh
that learning um the mitzvah of is
predicated on two principles. One is the
very study of Torah.
I'm not going to go into the whole sh
now. Teaching Torah is the Ram's
understanding of Torah and the second is
knowing God. So perhaps there is a um a
difference in obligation and level of
obligation between men and women when it
comes to talmudra but there's no
difference whatsoever when it comes to
avat.
And the way to fulfill is to study
Torah. So that's what gave the ro the
green light to say that women have to
study Torah without limitations. I mean,
it's amazing because he found another
box in the world of Alaka that actually
says it and and it's the Rambam that's
saying it. It's not some daring, you
know, it's the Ram that says it very
very clearly. So, you have here um a a a
a notion that the Rambam may have used
the word amuna. And I will say that this
translation or perhaps mistransation by
the uh Ibenton illustrious Ibent Tibon
family that translated the Rambam while
the Rambam was still alive but they
didn't live there was no communication
and so on in what we know as the listing
of the animma amen the 13 principles and
Ram never wrote those poems
but it reflected accurately what he
wrote in his introduction to the last
chapter of
so there he digresses and he gives us
the principles the 13 principles and
there too it's all in Judeo Arabic and
there too you have the difference
between the standard translations and uh
and that the word is lea to note now we
know the two words in Arabic even I'm
not a proficient at all in Arabic but I
do have home the original Arabic of the
sajons 's book called
Vida or Deote Vidot. And what is Eonote?
I can look at the Arabic equivalent of
Vidote. And then take a look at what the
Rambam wrote in Judeo-Arabic and you see
that he wrote the word dea. He the word
that he used in Judeo Arabic was
actually the word knowledge, not belief.
This is important, but I'm going to
digress for a second. And one of the
great shirim that the RV gave before um
Yamipa and it's printed in the book
Alachuva which was available both in
Hebrew and in English now um on
repentance I think it's called in in
Hebrew in English um these were dashes
that were given Yiddish everything
really is in translation the um the RV
dealt with the difference between amuna
and dea and what he said was phenomenal
but he pinned ended on these two Rambams
and he he said he begins as he usually
does with a contradiction in the Rambam.
How come the Rambam here said amuna
faith and over there he said which is
knowledge and and what the RV comes up
with is an ingenious idea. He says when
the Ram in source number one it talks
about
that the fundamental of fundamentals and
the pillar of wisdom is to know to
cognitively be aware the rough belief
that the Rambam wasn't saying that we
all have to become philosophers. This
was the first time I ever heard anybody
make that kind of a suggestion that this
was the Rambam's idea because it goes
against the grain of everybody.
Everybody. I mean anybody that studies
the first chapter of Torah understands
that the Ram's opinion is that to
fulfill the mitzvah of you have to
become a thinker and you have to it's a
thought process and so on. The RV came
up with an ingenious idea that he takes
the word amuna and forges it together.
And what comes out from this from this
mixture is a notion that you have to
believe in the existence of God
forever. forever in the sense um without
interruption an uninterrupted
sense of God's presence or better yet
the pukashemid
says this is what this is all about to
walk around with the awareness of
perpetually perpetually and that's how
the rob understood this little bit of a
sandwich or shiddok or merger of amuna
And
the fact that there is a need to be a to
be cognizant of a kadosh's presence
throughout the day is not something you
had to wait for the bra says it in
chapter 10 of where he talks about
that's how he say
you should be sensitive to the presence
of au parentally for forever wherever
you're doing and so on. The only thing
is on a practical level that's a tough
one because how can you be aware of
God's presence 24/7 even though that
might be the requirement. So the second
book of the Rambam which is called and
he doesn't talk about there and he
doesn't talk about the mitz of whichever
he talked about in the first book. He
talks about he talks about
and and and and
says and he gives a puk as he did in
every of the 14 books. He gives a puk
from
and professor turski son-in-law explains
what the rama meant by citing that poke
throughout the day I am engaged in
different activities that promote
because you're going to work so is not
exactly on your mind right now or should
be but it's not so you have you have and
you have you have fillin and you have
this you
And then of course expanded into 100.
And so it adds up a few seconds here and
a few minutes there. The Ram says muza.
So we think the muza means you buy a new
house or you move you know once a year,
twice a year, once a lifetime, thrice a
lifetime. We set up house nine times.
Okay. So every time you set up house,
you have to put up muzas. So that's it.
I mean the isuza. No, no, no. Rah says
every time you go in and out you're
supposed to not look at the fancy
covering but supposed to take note of
and you recognize that is there. That's
what the muz is there for to give you
that opportunity of
So the u this is how the r understood or
trying to work out the the the the
difference why he ram here and he said
they are there that it's really a it's
not something you have to be a
philosopher but but you have to have a
kadu's awareness of a kadu throughout
your lifetime throughout your lifetime
and that's how you fulfill the mitzvah
of
the is not here for me to challenge this
that that the word was never used by the
raam in that early source and I
certainly would be the last one to ruin
a whole dasha. It didn't ruin the whole
it wouldn't have ruined the whole dasha.
It was just a few pages of the dasha
that the made this point and and the
idea of having you know be his awareness
that's something that is in the raam as
well in the context of
but this is something that is important
as part of created world.
said that kadu created the world and
he's there and he wants you as a created
being to be sensitive to his being there
and that that's this is going to become
part for the next point and the next
point is ownership there is if you look
at just source number seven we'll get
back to the
five and six the garam and baba
babaakama so garamar babaakama the last
line the last line I'm not going through
the whole sug now we don't have time for
this It says
means that if if if a artisan somebody
takes a raw material and instead is wood
and there's this and there's that and
nails and and and paint and there a lot
of ingredients that went into making a
table or making a chair or making a
closet. The fact that the artisan made
it, that gives him ownership. That means
his ownership. Let's assume somebody had
um uh there was raw materials there. And
even a guy stole the raw material. He
stole the raw material. He stole the all
all the that which would be necessary to
make a chair or make a table. And now he
makes a chair and a table. And now the
the owner of the of the raw material
finds him and he says, "You're a ganif."
So, how much what what does the artisan
have to do? Does he have to take apart
the the the the table, the chair, and
give him back the the slabs of wood? No.
No. He has to pay him for the raw
material. That's what he has to do. He
has to pay. He stole the raw material.
They sp material. But the chair or the
table is now belongs to the artisan.
Because when you make something, that in
itself is ownership. How do you know
that? Who taught us this principle that
when you make something, it is by
definition yours? So look at the source
five
who created the world and therefore
everything is his. And that's number six
where it says
the owner of Shamay. And by what virtue
does own Shamay? It's because of
creation. Because of creation. Also just
a little um side remark here.
So on Friday night after we have a an
abbreviated type of
but it's not a bonafide at all at all.
The doesn't have to have his feet
together and and and he doesn't have to
bow.
It's not the first but it's an
abbreviated something. It's called
something like it's an abbreviated of
the seven. And he begins
and then everybody says
so that phrase
comes from right this. That's clear. So
how do we say it in three times a day?
So I saw in the book from Rabbi
on liturgy on he proves that the
original
was
but the because of censorship reasons
there was a medish that suggested that a
kadu was a partner with but a kadu in
creation. This got us into trouble with
the Catholic Church who believed that
you know the Yeshua was divine you know
Bahu and there was Yeshu and he's also
divine and so on look you guys have the
same idea you know kadosh was a partner
with with the kadoshu in the created
world so what are you coming to us with
a so they doctorred up the text and took
out the konesar
which was popular was known three times
a day people said it and They in its
place they wrote Kha. Kha was the bimcom
instead of um instead of the idea of
kones. It's a speech in itself because
it it connects to um
we have kam in the also in the morning
in shakar which originally was khem and
in the plural uh and that also gave us
some trouble. So we we we're always very
hyper sensitive in the middle ages to
the that the church might use against
us. But here you have the
which indicates ownership. So is the
owner and that's why when we say when we
say
the very end of of of both in the silage
and
we ask to save us from yenuh
is something that uses in the context of
a faulty business transaction that's
called oshk is you don't pay salaries
properly that's oshk it has only to do
with monetary and the RV asked ones says
what does Oshk have to come to where is
this all about so the RV said because
it's kadu owns everything and every a is
theft from a kadu so therefore the big
aa that we're coming to kadoshu to ask
for atonement for is theft from a
kadoshu everything that we took out of
context that we should have is theft and
and and and therefore um we we recognize
the fact that kadoshu owns everything
but gives us permission
gives permission to take use and to use
things properly and this leads us to the
last idea of what the creation was all
about. So not only is it the creation
something from nothing and not only is
it creation has continuity in this world
and not only is it creation that the
continuity of this world is has to be
appreciated and absorbed by human beings
and not only does it have the idea of as
the
before everything was created he was
there but he's the adonim
and so on as all the panim the poets had
it. But there is regeneration of the
world. And regeneration means that
there's constant rebirth and constant
constant uh um rehashing of things,
rebuilding, refining. And AMI is the
world at large, but specifically AMI is
a mission in being a co-artner with
Aadosh Bahu in continuing the world. And
for example, DV said,
"So
you might think like sevenday Adventist
that if it was designed by the divine
that you should be sick and die. So who
are you to intervene?" And you know in
the United States they went to the
Supreme Court on this because people
didn't want blood transfusions because
it was against their religion. Here the
Torah comes and says, "No, no, no, no,
no, no. You got sick. Okay, but you have
enough brains to figure out how to make
yourself healthy." So
go and make the person happy partner
with
continuing the world. What is the first
mitzvah given to humanity if not
procreation?
Keep it going. Okay. I created but
that's where that's where I stopped. Now
you continue continue creating creating
creating. And that's why we bring the
story of under the
that's why all of a sudden
because every
is another
and that's what we're doing
and this leads to the idea that if God
forbid there's a downfall you are
capable of picking up the pieces and
putting it back together. Look at the
medish. The rov used to quote either
this madrash or he would quote the
zohahar on this. But it's an idea that
is based anchored in kazal and it had to
do with the fact that a kadoshu
destroyed worlds and creates worlds. So
in the zohar it shows up as seven worlds
that a kadoshu we are the seventh world.
The number seven is a capitalistic
number as you know. So kadosh destroyed
worlds, created worlds, destroyed
worlds. So so the asked a simple
question. What did all these inhabitants
do in the first six worlds to to deserve
total annihilation and here we are at
the seventh world. So the rough said we
don't know what they did. So if we don't
know what they did so why give us an
England guy give us a tradition that
this happened. Said it came to teach you
that the first thing a kadosh does after
he destroys the world he builds a new
world. That's what we have to do. The
first thing we have to do is pick up the
pieces and build another world. R said
this in in the context of the shaah. He
fought am picked up the pieces and built
a new world. Today on October 7th, this
is what Ami is
obliged to do and we're trying to do it
in in in different sectors. uh not sure
that the government is helping in every
sector but I would say that the people
the nation this is a nation that uh
understands that we have to pick up the
pieces and continue and we are
continuing we are continuing and if you
look at the midrash it says
so erv what does arv mean it means
evening obviously but arav is symbolic
of confusion nighttime is darkness
confusion You don't know where you are.
Boare comes the word to discriminate.
You can see you put this on this side
and this on that side. It's light. It's
where things are more illuminated. So
means there'll be a there'll be periods
of time where is going to go through
periods of and there'll be times where
we will have boer and and and that's why
the gumar says why do we have the
mitzvah of creates twice a day? Why not
once a day? Remember there was a thing
called once a day multiple vitamins. You
take one pill and you're all set. So why
wasn't a declaration of belief? Once a
day. Why twice a day? I know because it
says
and then the gives a second reason
because says
why do I need that second? I know the
go to sleep when you get up. That's
twice a day. I got it. So what's
so the Garra says why? Whoever does not
say
in the morning and at night time didn't
fulfill his obligation as it says.
Which obligation is the Gor talking
about? What obligation? His obligation
of
what is the obligation? And I humbly
submit it's the mitzvah of the we're
questioning. Why is there a mitzvah of
kayachma in the morning at night? And
the answer is because there are two
times in the life of an individual and
the life of a nation where you must have
Israel on your side. One is when
everything is wonderful where the of is
just so clear. It's
cayam yasharmed.
this prophecy, this
all over the place. Wonderful. But
there's also times where is not so and
not so and it's not there
in Aza three years ago. It wasn't and it
wasn't the only thing left was
there was only left that was left. And
there you can also say
this was the
who understood that it was a dismal
failure. The merit we lost almost 2
million Jews at that time. The galut of
started 65 years later after the meritb
for sure
also taught us how to move on. He taught
us how to move on in his dying moments.
And we're still here to talk about it,
1800 years later. No doubt. And we're
going to be here to talk about the
aftermath of of what happened on some
Katawa three years ago. No doubt. We'll
pull it back together. The people who
moved back. I mean, we have a personal
interest. We have a daughter in SAD and
um my daughter sent a a a satellite
photo. Was it sat a photo? an aerial
photo of Otf Aza uh before the war, what
it looked like. You see beautiful, you
know, and and plante agriculture and
whatnot. And then there was a photo of
the morning of October 7th and you see
just smoke over the entire region and
one little area where spared and there's
no smoke there. It's kibbutz sad. No
smoke there. And our children were in
the mad for 26 hours.
And then they got a green light to scoot
out. They came to us for a day or two.
And then they went down to the Dead Sea
for 5 months. But they came back and
they're rebuilding, rebuilding, and
rebuilding. This is Amy's role at its
best.
We're able to really pull ourselves back
together. So there was building no doubt
but we took the cue from
after the destruction you rebuild the
new world and you just build it better.
You have to build it better. It has to
be a qualitative build and um and indeed
in this way we fulfilled the mandate of
vivoker. So there's boer and that boar
must necessarily lead to the day of.
Okay.