Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
The Glory of Tefillin (Part 1) by Rabbi Yitzchak Breitowitz
348 views
25 Adar I 5784 - March 12, 2024 Sponsored for the 2024 academic year by Rabbi Refoel and Sharon Auman. www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures #tefillin #halacha
Categories:Torah/Halacha
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
okay I hope uh this is okay I'm not sure
I just don't know how these things
work okay all righty so again we're
looking generally at the mitzvos that
are connected
to we were looking last week at the pon
B the Redemption of pidun haben uh
what's interesting is just to finish up
a little bit of a detail on that uh
generally speaking we know that a
firstborn child is considered to be
Sanctified until they are redeemed
because they became Sanctified because
they were saved by aades in the miracle
of makos in which the firstborn of Egypt
died and the Israelites were spared and
that created so to speak a debt to God
which manifested itself in kadosa and
the kadosa needs a Redemption and that
is the Redemption of what is called Pon
haben now it's interesting what does it
mean practically what does it mean to
say an unredeemed
B is Kos does that have any implication
at all of course is very very clear that
if someone was not redeemed at uh day 31
you have to redeem him later and he has
to redeem himself later I mean it's it's
much easier than pigeon a Ben at 30 is
much easier than a bris at 30 that much
is is true but in all the time we have B
that have to a pigon have been in the
light so of course there's such a
Mitzvah in fact it's even brought down
that the vagon would give the pigon Ben
money to every single Coen he met during
his life he had a firstborn son and uh
the villon said every Cohen is a
doubtful Coen we don't know for sure if
you're a Coen you know kohanim don't
have the documentation Etc uh when
there's a Bas am Mikus the standards of
evidence are going to be very very high
now a guy shows up and says I'm a Coen
we give him an alyah you know okay coene
huh oh so the Coen Gene that's very
intering the Coen Gene absolutely cannot
prove anything uh except except except
it may negate Kahuna meaning meaning it
may be the absence of the gene I me let
me give you a very simple example let's
imagine a male cohain marries a
non-jewish
woman so not only is their son not a
Coen their son is a but since the
male Gene is passed through the father
so he'll have the gene so this is what's
called a false positive the genetics
test cannot establish Guna but it might
negate Guna meaning the absence of it
might show that somebody is not a a Coen
uh so the Von felt course that was
before genetic testing that he never
knew if he had given the money to a Coen
so in order to be sure he would be say
the Mitzvah he gave it to every Co he
met on the chance that perhaps he would
get it right in that way now it is
brought down that there are certain
families in CLA Israel that can trace
their
K all the way back a Rapaport is
actually a very famous example the
Rapaport family is said to be able to
trace all the way back to Aron without
any problems in the middle but my
question simply is if you are an
unredeemed Bor what exactly is the
Holiness that you have so fascinatingly
this sorno
sayso was not a POS he was saying it is
a matter of biblical commentary that
when the Torah says kades every is
Sanctified it actually means an unred an
unredeemed Bor is only allowed to do
holy things like learn Torah and mitzvos
he is not allowed to do profane work so
this is a very big incentive on parents
to be m pigon because if you have a b
that is unredeemed you cannot ask him to
clean up his room uh or even do
his homework because that
is it's a very big uh we do not ping
like Theo at all uh we do not consider
this to have any implication other than
a certain spiritual Holiness but there
is no limitation on what a firstborn Bor
can do now what's interesting is uh pan
is going to be the most relevant aspect
of the Holiness of a b but there are two
other aspects that if you are a farmer
you have to be aware of the Torah
sanctifies not only the human firstborn
the Torah sanctifies the animal
firstborn the cow not the cow but the
the male you know the the bull the goat
the sheep that they have K now here
there are some very very practical
implications if I have a cow and a cow
gives birth to a bull which is its Bor
the first time it's given birth that Bor
so it depends if the Bor is an
unblemished Bor it has to be given to a
Coen and will be sacrificed as a Corban
in the Bas of mikash that the Coen will
eat the meat and even if the Bor has a
blemish it breaks the leg so it cannot
be sacrificed in the B mikdash it must
still be given to the Coen for the
co for himself now B we don't have a bik
so the truth of the matter is this would
create a great great dilemma if you're a
farmer and you your animal gives birth
to a Bor you are in big trouble now if
the Bor has a
blemish you give it to a Coen and the
Cohen can have it
and the Cohen can even distribute the
meat to an and the like that's if it has
a blemish but you're not allowed to make
a blemish in a Bor so you're stuck if I
have a Bor number one it's supposed to
be a Corbin there's no Bas a mikash I'm
not allowed to break its leg or even
scratch it so it would have a mum to be
M I'm not allowed to Shear its wool if
it's a sheep I'm not allowed to milk it
well milk milk wouldn't be relevant it's
a but that's true anyway but I'm not
allowed to do work with it and I'm not
allowed to share it so it's a real real
problem so the only thing the postum
tell me to do if I'm stuck with that
very very difficult situation is I'm
allowed to scatter barbed wire
throughout the yard so to speak SC so I
can't make a mo but I can create an
obstacle in which there would be a and
then you give it to a Coen and the Coen
can have it Sheed give it back to you to
yes he could in other words it doesn't
have uh it's not once it has a mum it
doesn't have Holiness it just belongs to
a Coen and the Coen can actually give it
back to Israel now because of this the
poim give us a very very simple bit of
advice and that is the first mishna in
MOS says that any animal which is owned
in
Partnership by a Jew and a
non-jew the vad that is born from that
animal does not have the sanctity of Bor
so as a result if you're a Jewish farmer
you're well advised you have livestock
to sell the ear of your uh pregnant cow
or goat or or sheep to a nonu be even a
little tiny little part like an Earl and
as a result that will be Mafia that will
take away the Holiness of the B now I
know myself of a case in Baltimore where
there was a um a couple that were not
religious initially who had a petting
zoo you know with goats and sheep and
you know animals like that and uh they
had never heard about this thing about a
before uh and they become religious and
all of a sudden they realize that some
of their animals are technically a Bor
and they were stuck because once it's
born a Bor with kadus you don't have the
eights of selling it to a guy selling it
to a guy or selling part of it to a guy
works only before before the animal is
born and you sell part of the mother uh
to a g so they were really really stuck
and you know it's very difficult
especially with a sheep not to be able
to Shear a sheep it's very uncomfortable
for the Sheep itself because it keeps on
growing and growing I'm not sure what
wild sheep do exactly how they get
around that problem uh but generally
speaking there's a s issue and if a
sheep Falls over and it's very loaded
with wool it won't even be able to get
up again so that's a difficult question
so I'm just telling you in advance if
any of you own a livestock uh be very
very careful to be sure that the females
uh before they give birth to their first
child male well you don't know male or
female uh to sell an ear to the non-jew
now there's one more aspect that's even
more peculiar and that is there is only
one non kosher animal that has the
sanctity of Bor and that's a a donkey a
donkey now here the Tyra gives you two
choices and we don't know all the
reasons for this one is either the
donkey has to be killed or the donkey
can be Redeemed by a sheep that you give
to a Coen now the Sheep is not a Corbin
the Sheep is not a Corbin the Sheep is
the coen's property to be Sheed and once
again the Coen could then give it back
to Israel or give the meat St up but the
Sheep has to be given to the coed this
is called
pidion Peter
the
Redemption of the pet the one that opens
the womb the donkey now this was a
Mitzvah that is not done very often but
it's experienced a bit of a Renaissance
in recent years as people are
looking okay you can question this you
know for example sh looking for a bird
to send away has become very very
popular uh and pigeon pet is not as
popular sh but it's uh it's getting up
there in fact I know a a lawyer in
Detroit a a firm lawyer in Detroit that
as a sideline he arranges pigeon Petra
throughout the United States because he
knows about licensing and transporting
transporting livestock across state
lines is not so P but he kind of figures
out how to uh do all of this so I if any
of you are going to be in the states and
you want to do a pigeon
Petra uh we can arrange it and in ER
Isel it's also done uh you see it on
YouTube uh and and and and the like uh
fact baby donkey really looked very very
cute it was only a 30-day old donkey and
they brought it into a bass medish
strangely enough and it was wearing all
sorts of fancy
embroidered uh you know blankets and the
like and the donkey was just looking
around it had a really interesting time
like what on Earth is going on and they
gave the Sheep to a Coen the Sheep was
lifted by the Coen a lamp
and that was the Pig
p what do they do what what is this if a
person refuses doesn't want to do that
to
they well I've never heard of it but but
is yeah is if you don't want to be
you're to be now once again once again
uh you can avoid all of these halos by
simply selling when the pregnant female
uh is carrying baby or even before you
sell the ear and that's going to pter uh
the whole business so be it as it may
the ins and the outs are not easy to
understand I I MIM to that uh but never
nevertheless it is very very clear that
the Holiness of in all of its
manifestations is
a it is to commemorate the
makos and therefore it is a Mitzvah that
connects us
to is there any reason given for
choosing a donkey of all the own kosher
animals to yeah you're correct I donkey
is obviously not a kosher animal and
it's the only non- kosher animal that
has the potential to be a Bor uh you
know no other animal has that issue in
fact even other kosher animals like deer
there's no din of Bor it's only for cow
sheep goats and Donkey that's the only
only ones that you have it's connected a
little bit because just as uh the Torah
says
that um no dog even wetted its tongue no
dog barked Mak dogs normally sense the
Mal and they were silenced not to scare
uh the Jewish people and that's why
there's actually a Mitzvah when you have
non Kosher meat to feed it to the dogs
as reward so donkeys we have a similar
thing donkeys tend to Bray they also
have a sense of males and they were
silent so it's similar uh to the dog
that the donkey is honored so to speak
with a certain
Holiness yeah so why not the dog you
know you're right you're right in other
words they're honored in two different
ways you're correct the dog is honored
by getting the meat and the donkey is
honored by being redeemed so you can
question who gets the better deal there
I I I don't know but the point is both
of them are sources of Honor because
they did not respond to the Mal by the
way a little thing about donkeys that
that one should know uh you know donkey
of course is exemplary of the stubborn
animal right stubborn as a as a donkey
but the truth is donkeys are not
stubborn donkeys are very intelligent
and they're very cautious so because of
this they're more independent than
horses so if you tell a donkey to walk
down a path the donkey has to evaluate
uh if it's safe so the stubbornness is
actually independent thinking uh that
might be a lesson to our own children
right your children are not always
stubborn uh
sometimes they're thinking things out
and that's actually a good uh that is
actually a good a good quality okay so
what I want to talk about today this was
just finishing up I wanted to talk about
oh one one other just one other thing uh
people make a mistake uh and this may be
obvious so forgive me if I'm just
telling you the obvious pigeon Aben is
not the 30th day after birth it is the
31st day after birth that actually means
30 days days must pass before you do
pigeon AED now some postum even say it
has to be 30 time 24 hours meaning to
say the following if a child was born
let's say 2 minutes before
Shia you don't just count that as day
one you have to have
30 periods of 24 hours so that might
mean that even on day 31 you're not
going to do pigeon aan you know in the
morning you're going to have to wait
till 5:30 P p.m. or whatever it is
that's called M that is a however we do
not require
May some even say that by a bar mitzvah
by the way they even say it has to be to
the hour we don't p in that way but we
do pin it has to be 30 days and you
cannot do the pigeon event until day 31
so I I bring this up because people that
have asked me shus this week about
scheduling a pigeon event and and all of
their questions were assuming piden is
on day 30 which is actually not EMS it
is day 31 okay but the next I want to
talk
about is the Mitzvah ofin and what's
interesting is in
parasin and Bor are mentioned in Ju
position twice there is a
parades sanctify every B and then it
mentions again when Hashem brings you to
the land
you shall sanctify the B and in both of
those paros back to back back to back we
have a reference as well
toilin and of course tan is also
mentioned in the first paragraph of
schma and in the second paragraph of
shma so Fillin are mentioned four times
in the Torah and of course in the thin
the proverbial mysterious black boxes we
do have the four paragraphs that talk
about
sh right sh
is is
Ines is in
and is in B right these are the four
paros ofin of course the wordin does not
appear in the
Torah uh what is the
Tor in all four
places you shall tie
it as a
sign now upon your hand let's read it
just very literally doesn't even say arm
it
says and it should be what is to well
the English gives us the helpful
translation it shall be for
filteries right so this is an example
where translations work in the opposite
direction normally I look at the English
to understand the Hebrew I have to here
I have to look at the Hebrew to
understand the English oh Fela is are
filling right but Fela is Greek actually
and it means an adornment so the word
toot means adornments and in fact the
mishab when it talks about different
types of
jewelry that a woman can wear when
there's no a it talks about a toet a a
plate a decorative uh forehead adornment
so toot means an dorment there'll be an
adornment now it's interesting that this
is one interesting case where the
carites you know we know the Kim are
still around not too many of them but
they are still around and the kites do
not accept the T the carites focus only
on the biblical narrative because of
this by the way the Kim became very very
expert in dikduk
and in tanak simply because that's
essentially all they learned all they
studied and what's interesting is to
digress for a moment that that is why we
have commentaries like the
abarbanel who will sometimes quote kite
biblical interpretations not not when
they contradict but just in terms of
words because the kar did get a great
expertise in biblical interpretation uh
of course A lot of times the barbanel
and the eanz will quote them and argue
with them but sometimes they will even
quote them with approval in fact there's
even an amazing story and it may be a
legend you never know about these
stories about the great
revon he was the last of the Goon and
many say the greatest of the gon Ravon
un usual name raon and The Story Goes
that his Yeshiva was right across the
street from a
monastery and one time they're learning
uh some difficult passage in are you and
go says to one of his why don't you go
across the street and see how they
understand it maybe they have a good
understanding here so the student was
like paralyzed he didn't know what to do
just he just sat there with his mouth
open and go and says what's the matter
you think you can't learn from the go he
says
say you can see wisdom even among the
Gentiles even though it's not Torah
and we have a famous saying although I
don't think it's from but the ramb
brings it course ra is before the
r accept the truth from whatever source
so there was a tradition that of haon
would even uh talk schmoo and learning
so to speak with the people in the
monastery over biblical interpretation
but generally speaking there are Kar
even today right there's a kite the
synagogue and the light and what's
interesting is that Kim wear situs at
least the T if you walk into a kyite
synagogue they will wear a Talis they do
not wear
tet and the reason is because they claim
interestingly enough that this is an
allegorical PK when it says you shall
tie them on your hand and they should be
an adornment between your eyes it is
referring to the teachings of the shma
the unity of God and loving God your
hand is symbolic of Your
Action and your between your eyes is
symbolic of your brain and therefore
it's as if the Torah is telling me that
you should internalize these ideas in
your
mind and you should translate them into
AC as a matter of fact we agree with
that thought as I'll tell you in a
moment but the way the kites do it is
they say that they don't understand
there to be a MIT fill in at all it is
all understood as internalizing these
teachings now the only reason we know
that that's not the case is because we
have an oral
tradition that fill in are black and
filler square and you have to have the
four par but since they don't accept the
veracity of the T they're actually
correct might not automatically tell me
there's a physical Mis F see this is an
the reason I'm bringing this up is this
is an interesting example of
how is not always literal people think
oh the simple meaning is always literal
and the carites are always literal this
is precisely an example where the carite
interpretation is not literal because in
contextual sense of the verse it
actually refers to that PO potic
nonliteral meaning soat and literal are
not always the same sometimes is bka not
literal and that's the position
Forin but we of course have t so they do
wear because in bidor you can't get out
of it you shall tie the strings to your
garment so they're kind of stuck with
that another thing too they observe
theim although different calendar but
they don't blow chauffeur in
rash because again again if you read the
literally the word chaar is not
mentioned in connection with Ros the
word chaar is only mentioned by the
Jubilee year every 50 years uh the only
phrase that is used by R is
y now we interpret trua is blowing of
the chauffeur yeah we interpret that but
they say trua can also mean shouting
praying singing and therefore they
actually observe the holiday of rashash
without Chau far very very interesting
um but be it as it may uh Aris of course
is that fill in are the proverbial black
boxes that contain the four paros now
the basic idea of Fillin however
spiritually is exactly not that I want
to give credit to the kites but the
spiritual idea of Fillin is exactly what
the kir say but we have to concretize it
in a Mitzvah and that is every single
morning a man who puts Onin is
dedicating his physical
strength to God his mind his intellect
and his emotions that's why the Fain is
on the left hand ked the which is said
to be the seed of emotion Raji y points
out a very beautiful idea by cabala SA
the Jewish people said
nishma and the meaning of
nishma is we agree to hashem's
Commandments even before we know what
they are if they would have said
nishma
the the other way around that would have
meant what nishma let's hear what you're
offering us and then we'll see if we'll
do
it is giving Kadesh a blank check Nas
we're gonna do it now tell us what you
want us to do so not the greatness of
nishma is unconditional
submission to the will of God that's a
wonderful thing I don't need to know
what it is whatever it is I'm going to
try to do it it's a wonderful thing Raj
writes every
morning the filling
is an
individualized because by putting on the
filling of the
hand before I put on the filling of the
head I am pledging my action before my
cognition you see it's
m you put on the Y before the RO because
that is how the Torah was accepted and
every single day the man who puts on
Fillin is accepting the Torah in that
way
um I I often tell people you know there
one needs to know one is uh not fully
observant yet that wearing Fillin is
totally independent of the Mitzvah of
daving so let's say a person says I'm
not ready to dve I'm not going to dve in
shakas for a half an hour or 45 minutes
it's too much I'm not going to do it
okay he not ready yet but you could
still tell the person put on fillan and
take it off put on Fillin and take it
off you have fulfilled two positive
Commandments because they count this two
in the 613 the Mitzvah of head filling
of hand filling the Mitzvah of head
Fillin now it's true that it is proper
to read the shma with Fillin as well
says He who reads shma in the morning
without Fillin is giving false testimony
because um you say ukart
you're saying there's a Mitzvah F okay
that's fine but if he's not ready to do
that Fillin is a
MIT it's a separate Mitzvah and I find I
found myself in people that filling is
often a Gateway you know people ask
what's the Gateway Mitzvah so some say
chabas is a major Gateway obviously
kashus is a major Gateway but chabas and
kashus can be very very difficult
there's a lot of things to do on chabas
Etc a kis might be difficult for people
depending on where they
are it's not so difficult uh but Fain
can often be a Gateway people do feel
inspired there actually is something
about pledging my strength my emotions
my mind to connect to aades it's a
beautiful beautiful thing so and as raj
says this is
AAS Cabas now we did discuss I don't
want to repeat the whole discussion that
under the
RCT a woman is exempt
fromin precisely because it is time
bound because we don't wear Fillin on
chabas but based on the normal Dynamic
of Hal it should appear that a woman
would be allowed to put Onin and even uh
make a bra on them according to
ASM and yet the Rama brings does bring
that not only is a woman exempt from
Fillin but BisMan a woman should not put
on Fillin becausein have special
requirements regarding uh the Goof
hygiene if a man for example has
diarrhea or something he also would not
put on fill since a woman has uh nid
issues in different flows so uh it was
considered to be inadvisable now whether
that does apply when hygienic conditions
change is an interesting debate meaning
it's not a cut and dry I don't want to
get in trouble here but it is not a cut
and dried rule that a woman cannot wear
filling based on contemporary conditions
it is at least a debatable issue but as
you know yourself the Min still is that
generally speaking women do not um in
the state I'm not sure what's going on
here I haven't heard anything here but
in the states it's a little bit of an
issue in uh certain uh modern Orthodox
co-ed Community Schools coet high
schools where a lot of the student body
might be conservative or reform homes
that occasionally women girls do come in
and they put on Fillin and uh you know
they're not rebelling this is just their
Min so to speak and the principal is
confronted with uh the issue and the
principal says well listen this is the
minog of their family Min okay Min okay
I mean it's coming from conservative
reform but it's a you know it's a
difficult issue so um I I if I I'm not
going to be I'm not going to be outraged
over this I'm not going to condemn it uh
it is true the RMA brings that the Min
is not to but the Rama gave a reason
that may be less applicable today uh but
the one thing that I can say
unequivocally in which there's no makus
whatsoever is women are clearly exempt
from villain because it's
a now notice that I said this is
important that
is because we don't wearin on shabas or
yto now you might ask me well why didn't
I also add we don't wear fill in at
night wouldn't that also be a reason so
the answer is it's very
interesting we actually pasin that
dillin can be worn at night but there's
a rinic decree not to wear Fillin at
night lest you fall asleep in them which
would be disrespectful but
is in and therefore that wouldn't be the
reason to exempt women but shab and yam
are
not so let's go back a little bit why is
that well well that that itself is
meaning isus in the if Lila is zamanin
or not the one that now there is an
opinion that says Lila is not Z and
based on thatas but we not that way we
actuallya is and it's only a Gaz lest
you fall fall asleep now so why don't we
we to fill in on
chabas yeah that's right so it says uh
that filling is called a
sign it is a sign of our relationship
with God and the Jewish male has another
sign the Brit Mila of their relationship
with God and the Torah says Al you
should always have two witnesses to
affirm your identity and shab shabas is
called a sign so therefore it turns out
that during the week the two signs are
Brit andin on chabas I don't needin
because I have chabas chabas is the side
now what's interesting is the Balor one
of the him says quite an amazing thing
very very amazing thing he says
if a Jew did not have a Brit mea now
obviously this would be for medical
reasons I mean any Jew who doesn't have
a bris intentionally is not going to
worry about filling I can't imagine that
but but let's ass because of Sak he did
not have a bris so that means that
during the week he only has one sign
filling but NE what else could he do on
chabas he should wearin so at least one
day a week he'll have two sides he'll
have chabus and he'll havein since he
doesn't have bris so the Baler actually
says a person who did not have a bris
should wearin even even on chabas um do
we pass in that way it's hard to know
this is not a hypothetical that happens
uh very often all I can say is that the
Mish bre does not bring such a thing so
our assumption is if it wasn't brought
probably we don't pass the way but you
don't really know yeah
seems of uh not putting on filling on
chabas because you already have you have
base ate him but but the
says so you're saying the is if you can
have three why not have three that's a
good uh that that's a good question yeah
yeah um maybe this as as a woman how do
you understand that since you don't have
those things well you know this is much
more of a of a of a general broad broad
question and the standard mahalik now
again some people call it apologetic but
but the standard mahalik is that a lot
of the externalized manifestations of
faith in Gods uh women are in less
spiritual need of because they've
internalized the Muna to a much greater
degree so the standard you know the
standard answer uh is that this is not
something a woman's n needs because
she's internalized the idea of amuna now
I know some people get angry with that
uh but but but but I I think in amuna at
least in particular I think there's a
real truth just my own experience
dealing with different people uh women
are very great in amuna remember they
didn't sin with Theo they had auna that
Moshe would be coming down uh they
didn't sin with the morum they had faith
that we will be be successful in ER to
well so amuna again I'm not generalizing
Every Woman every man is this every
woman is this but women have excelled
throughout the history of Cl Isel in
their really un undiluted
Ines so it's not so ra to say that these
externalized
manifestations of amuna are are less
necessary for somebody who internalize
them uh in their own lives yeah I'm
sorry
um two questions one is if if you can in
your schedule take time um to explain
the thing about rashi's daughter I think
it was yes that's one thing okay and the
second thing um there are groups I know
who they were to filling all day and I
thought that when you were to filling
you have to concentrate always that it's
and it's impossible so how is that all
okay so yeah so let me talk about that a
little bit um if you read the gamarra in
Bros and the like it's very very clear
that there was a widespread
practice uh for men to wear tfillin the
whole day I mean they would go to work
they would be wearing tfillin tfillin is
what a Jewish person uh what a Jewish
person wore uh over the years that
became less uh done because you're with
the non-jews and and and the like uh but
the vagon wanted to himself
reestablished it and in the ziler system
which is following the minhag of the Von
uh the kids Bar Mitzvah boys work to
fill in the whole day I I remember I
happened to Once be there right before
chabas it really was almost like a bunch
of angels walking around they're all
dressed up in their shining white shirts
and they're still wearing fillan until
the last minute until right before
chabas so they're just walking around
with with beautiful a beautiful site now
here is the issue though it is brought
down that when a person wears filling
they're not allowed to engage in idle
conversation and they're not allowed to
have levity fool arounds col now they
are allowed to go to work I mean they're
allowed to go to work they're allowed to
cook food they're allowed to do regular
activities in other words they don't
have to just learn or doin they can do
their regular life but you have to be
very uh serious and conscientious as a
result it was thought that in later
generations most people are not able to
live at that standard so if I had for
example a boy in Yeshiva who wanted a
words it's fill in all day I can promise
you the rabam would discourage him from
doing it they would say this is not what
we do we're not always on the madrea uh
to do it uh and and the like but for the
greatest sikim uh it's a good thing R
shinberg in our generation r p shinberg
in addition to the 100 pairs of SES that
he wore which is another another issue
but maybe it's a little less known that
he actually wore filling the whole day
and even when he was he had he had very
small fillings so he he could cover it
up with his hat even when he was on an
airplane he had a hat and you know he
was wearing uh wearing Fillin so there
were people and as I saying the zberman
school they even have the uh the kids uh
the kids do it I'm not sure it's
interesting well do they have recess I
don't know I don't know I'm not sure how
that works out I think there's a real
problem now it could be they could take
it off and put it on again meaning the
way it's filling works is even if you
wear it the whole day it doesn't mean
it's on you the whole day for example
going to the bathroom you take it off
and you make a new braa so it could be
it's entirely permissible I take it off
for recess let's have some let's have
some fun in the art and then I'll put it
on again meaning uh that's possible you
could take it off and put it on many
times and you still have the Mitzvah of
you know wearing it for a prolonged Peri
per but it doesn't mean that you're in a
straight jacket that you're not allowed
to ever you know uh have some some
recreational fun activity now with
rashi's daughters just just to mention
that there is a well one thing is one
woman who for sure warts fill in because
this is recorded in the gamar is mik b
sha it says beish in the gamar that mik
the daughter of sha War f it problem is
mik is an ambiguous edent so to speak
because on one hand she was righteous on
the other hand you know she was
criticized because she criticized doid
for dancing so it's not really clear if
mikal is a legitimate legitimating
precedent or maybe it's a negative
precedent meaning and that's why there
are two texts there are two gearos in
the gamar uh geara number one
says
w
the did not protest which may mean they
allowed it or approved it there's
another
Gea did protest have
two in the gamar so that's the one case
we know for sure the second case is a
tradition which many historians say is
not true so I I don't know and that is
that Rashi did not have sons Rashi had
daughters rashi's daughters were very
learned and here I think it is recorded
that he taught he learned kamor with
them so uh in terms of women learning
gamar that I think we do have a fairly
clear precedent for uh but uh the legend
has it that rashi's daughters or at
least some of them W Fillin but I think
most historians say that's an
unsubstantiated Google says it's leg I
didn't
hear Google
oh Google says okay that's that's
probably where I got it from
okay yeah yeah yeah yeah I I look at R
Google also anyway I think all of us uh
regard it as our as our rebi okay um
yeah so uh you know you know you never
know now it's interesting that uh just
as little aside about rashi's daughters
you know one of the M that's very
obscure m a little bit
is that deals with vows and and masor
does have a commentary of Rashi like
every M but uh on the outer margin is a
commentary of the
r which is much longer and
in unless you're doing it you do the
Rashi everyone skips the Rashi and
everyone learns the ran the ran is the
standard commentary for narim and almost
nobody unless they're really M and
everything almost nobody even looked I
mean when I learned theorm n Isel uh for
for a year uh we did not look at Rashi
once I don't recall even in Shear the
rebi bringing up what was called
Rashi it's obscure it's difficult uh
whatever but I I hope this is not the
reason but uh some say that the
commentary on
madim was written by one of rashi's
daughters now I hope I hope that that is
not the reason is it is not studied uh
but you know who knows uh but they do
say that uhor and na both both M where
the Rashi is not studied some attributed
to to rash's rashi's daughters so they
were great uh
great um see is an ambiguous word in
Translation does mean a wise student or
a student of the wise that would be if
it's a student of otherwise then even
when you're talking about a woman
she you still have because you're not
modifying the T saying she just do right
to that question of how you how you say
that and and and the like okay so that's
the idea of shabas now just to go over
this shabas and Y of course are both the
same
no is a huge mlus as you know because on
one hand it does have some s of Y but
it's not completely a y
it's and that is why there are
different
some
wear some with a some without a and some
don't we fill at
all the of most of both
among is not to wear to fill
in uh but it's not Universal there are
there are yis for example who will still
wearin even in ER Isel uh and if that
was your Min you're not to discard it
but clown many ashaz even if they wore
fillan uh back in the US or wherever uh
will stop
wearing of course in a way I mean there
is a logical connection here because
inel is observed very differently thano
uh back in the United States uh in the
United States uh there's more of a than
there is a mo meaning to
say just like Mitzvah more bar than
Mitzvah but
anyway but uh so in in America it's more
than Mo so you know it kind of makes
sense like what you go to work you drive
around you do everything but when it
comes toin I treat it like y I mean
listen if you're treating Ki like a
weekday you ought to wear chillan I mean
it's only Forin that all of a sudden
you're
saying can't where fing but
in I mean sometimes it's very
frustrating you want to go shopping you
want to get something you have some
extra time you know everything's closed
this is closed that is closed but but so
it's it's frustrating on some level but
it's good it's good that that is mish
considered to be part of the so this is
not the reason why it developed this way
but in a way it it makes more sense in
erel to treat it like a yump that you
don't wear it's fill in then it might be
in uh then it might be in
in okay um anyway you know the gar says
in makos if you treat moadim with
disrespect so you lose
your and Rashi says in
makos refers
to meaning it doesn't
say uh it's not referring to desecrating
y it's referring to not
treating with the requisite respect so
it's something that uh you know all of
us uh need to be need to be aware of the
the kadus of of of okay so be it as it
may we did we did explain why the Yad
precedes the RO because of
nishma but there's another interesting
point about Yad and Ro that is both
that's fill in of the hands
and the filling of the head contain the
identical four
paragraphs
of in other
words and then
Kadesh right four in the Y four in the
RO but they're written in a very
different way in the ad
they are written on one piece of
parchment four paragraphs written on one
big fat piece of parchment that's then
rolled up and put in the
box in the
RO they are written in four
separate small parchments that are
inserted in four
compartments right so if you look at
it's fill in chel Ro you will see four
compartments literally and if you open
it up up you'll see there are four
inside compartments that inserted right
so
here once again following Raj there's an
understanding of that idea as well and
that is the fenel RO represents our
attempt to understand
Hashem understand the Torah learning by
defin by definition is sequential I
understand one idea then I understand
another idea by definition it has to be
compartmentalized because you learn a
little at a time but the commitment to
action meaning my commitment to the
ratem is absolute meaning to say iish I
commit even before I understand and then
I attempt to understand in a gradual
sequential organized way it reflects the
idea that I got to start with the
commitments which is total
undifferentiated and then I sequentially
try to understand a little bit at a time
now here this is the basis of the huge
mes Rashi and
Raben and that
is it's starts off as Aus about thein
Shel Ro
thein Shel Ro and that is the order in
which the paragraphs are put in the
Shell Ro we have four
compartments right so uh rashi's
position is you follow the order of the
Torah now in the order of the Torah it
would be
Kadesh because both of them are in Bow
then you'd have
sh
and so you're following the order of the
Torah kades going from actually and
you're going from the right but not the
right of the one wearing to fill in the
right from the perspective and you're
looking at me so from your right right
to left right to left looking at me
Kadesh meaning order of
tah according to rabenu who is rashi's
own grandson
uh it
goes and then you start from the other
end so the so the are in the
middle are in the middle now you might
say who
cares but the point is this is very very
important the gamar has
a that the say there of the
parot the order of the parot
are they affect the kasas of thein so if
you were to wear yourin with the wrong
order of the
parot the F puzle which means for RAB to
wear rashi's fill he would not be
Y and for Rashi to wear
A's he would not be o so even though we
don't necessarily understand logically
why this is such a big
issue this is some this is not just a
mitvah
or orra or a Min this actually affects
the kis of theill so this immediately
gives rise to really one of the most
difficult questions in
history how does such a m has ever
developed I mean rabenu was rashi's own
grandson and
until rabam who lived in the
1100s theill that were worn were
following again it's not even rash the
standard practice was order of the Torah
so comes rabam and essentially declares
based on his reading of Gomorrah that
the whole Jewish
world is Doing It
Wrong nobody is United States Fillin my
grandfather
Rashi has never warned Fillin in his
lifetime huh I mean how do how do you
get that I mean there are really a few
questions meaning how can R simply
posle what everybody was
doing so on that the answer is well R
time is not the first one to invent this
if you go back in Jewish history you
will find there always were these two
views in the ancient ganas you find it's
filling in different Arrangements there
always were these two views and they're
simply arguing over which should be the
Hally valid view but even if you say
that Rashi and are not The
Originators of this m okay it's an old M
but you could still ask how did the M
start I mean was given by Hashem to
Moshe presumably in Moser renu's time he
told us exactly what we're supposed to
do now is a for that you do every you
know six days a week so how do you getus
about that meaning I understand on
occasional things things that don't
happen that often so people don't
remember that happens in SCH all the
time you know do you say him on a given
shabas right that's the old story about
the new Rabbi that was hired by the show
and immediately there was some question
do you say this do you say that and some
people were yelling say it and some say
don't say it so the rabbi didn't know
really because he didn't know what the
SCH Min was so he asks an Oldtimer he
says what's the Min here he says the Min
here we fight about it this is this is
this is our Min everywhere so so when
you have occasional
issues okay there could beus people
don't remember but when you have
something that's done every day like
who's the first you know sare who
deviated from the practice it's a it's a
bit of a mystery like H how do you
introduce uh a disunity or a
non-conformity in a Mitzvah that's
that's done constantly but nevertheless
it is brought down that Rashi and are
not The Originators of this Theus goes
all the way back
so a regular PA Fillin is
Rashi right so if you buyin you're
buying Rashi R time is special order
most people do not
wear but the says if a person is
a he will try to fulfill both opinions
and
have and as you know uh it is most
common
among and
many who follow this and uh there are
two ways of doing it the way do it is
they wear rashi's Fillin for most of
daving till the middle of karat or
whatever it is and then they take off
the Rashi and they put on R that's how
do it many maybe you've seen this they
actually wear both filling at the same
time they have smaller Fillin they'll
wear a ro side by side and they'll wear
no double here of course they have to
have smaller Boton to be able to locate
everything in the right location of the
arm and on the on the head and they
actually wear twoin at once and thear
says beish that um that M there is a
place in the head on the head they have
two pairs of ofet
soer the great T of the Von once asked
the
Von uh why didn't he wear
aillet the Von didn't wear
a and the vill said well why should
I well there
you want to be all the different views
of so the Von said if I wanted to be all
the different views ofin I would have to
wear 67 Pairs ofin and the Von went
through every single m not just between
those two among all the commentators and
you want to be say
everybody you're going to have to have
67 pairs of F and since the billon says
I'm not able to do that he said says why
why should I only want to beash which is
only a
single and therefore the V only wore
rash
but do do do both there are actually
other arrangements as well sh for
example has has a m that the rebi only
the rebi the rebi would wear a third
Arrangement ofin that's called
Shima andab likes to point out that when
the fre
re gave a pair of shim Rober fing to
that was in effect validating him to be
the next rebi uh if you're not the rebi
you're not you know you don't wear this
third pair of of Fillin uh and uh and
and the like what's
the I you know I honestly don't remember
I'll I'll check it I I don't remember
but is a different order
yeah forgive me you didn't quite say
where did the come from to
I I didn't answer it I I don't know all
I'm saying is it didn't start with Rashi
R so if you look at thei you will see
like meaning there were proofs that go
all the way back in ganas if you go to
chyoa other ginas uh Mada even you will
find Fillin in both
configurations so there was an ancient
tradition that there were at least two
ways they fill in were organized uh but
as I say
the is which should be the yeah maybe
that's why it
says because of two well well uh again
though I mean I wouldn't call that a
proof because under any Arrangement it
is four
compartments compart I either way it's
four compartments yeah I don't say this
is cly not the reason for why the
between but it seems it seems
interesting that Rashi
holds
and here he goes he goes with to M here
here he follows the chronological think
yeah very good I I hear the I hear the
hor uh they do again they tell the
Legends no Rashi himself worked fill in
the whole
day and uh the legend goes when R little
rabeno Yakov Ben mayor was a was a
little child on rashi's knee he pulled
up he pulled out his father's fill and
Sh R and pulled it off just like you
know so you know who who who knows and
and the like yeah what did R do uh the
rambam followed Rashi the r followed
Rashi fing in fact as I say it's a it's
a little bit of a misnomer just like
I'll give you another example we talk
about
Rashi you know the special Rashi there
nothing to do with Rashi it's a regular
font that was used in many many theas
reason why it's called Rashi script is
not because Rashi BFA wrote it that way
but because the very first Hebrew book
that was printed uh was Rashi that the
very first Hebrew Book and they used
that fun so it became known as rashi's
so the same thing when we talk about
rashi's filling it happens to be rashi's
opinion but he he did not originate this
he was just codifying what the standard
practice had already been so Rashi was
not the inventor of this nor nor was R
the inventor of his these are two very
ancient traditions and the M ISS how do
we Pas and as I say I will leave it as a
bit of a mystery how did two Divergent
Traditions emerge in that way since fill
in is something that is daily it's not
an occasional thing I'm sorry uh some oh
yeah there the say that to to the way
the P appear in the Trad correct yes yes
so so why why then do
we no no I want to point out I'm sorry I
I should have made it clear the the
sameus of the RO is also in the Y
meaning to say now here's a bit of a
subtlety though meaning according
to it
is and Kadesh same thing but but but
here is a subtlety this is going to be
an amazing subtle
even
r that the paros have to be written in
the order of the Torah even though
they're placed not in the order of the
Torah which means if I'm a sare and I'm
writing fill in so according to Rashi
it's simple I write
kades like this is what I have to do I
write shma
I then
skip the size of I write and then I go
back and I
write in other words according
to you write one in other words in in
the Y it's one two
43 but you have to write it 1 two 3 4
okay you get it know there's one you
write it one two skip three uh skip the
third one write kades and then go back
there is
a fill inad as well yeah well is that I
don't I don't
remember have toite order if you skip
you can't go back and put it there
that's correct it's filling
them it's exact it's exactly the same
this is
why and have to be written in order now
that that means it's almost impossible
if you have a letter in thein that's
pule you can't just fix the letter
because you wrote it out of order
because all the stuff that came
afterwards was written before this
letter so that's why by and
muza uh it's very depending on the pil
it's a very technical area but generally
speaking you will not be able to fix
them but how you How do you how do you
do it how do you do it with r because
he's writing out of
order no the same thing you wrote you
wrote it in order that's that's what I'm
saying even like R you wrote it in order
that's that's the
sh Shad no even the shalad you skipped
in other words you wrote skiing
considered be out of order no no you no
you you just skipped it you didn't write
anything in other words uh you wrote
kades
before even though appears before
Kadesh yeah yeah I just want to point
out that Hashem has ra
that there's no such for a safer Torah
because imagine the situation where
every time you had a p a cracked letter
in a safer Torah the whole Torah could
not be repaired that would have been uh
an enormously difficult situation so a
safer Torah does not have to be written
in order and therefore a pule letter can
be corrected without having to rewrite
everything that comes after
that pule letter but Forza there is a
indeed a den of CID and that's even true
like R where the placement of both the
yach and the RO is not considered okay
we'll stop here have a good week a
good because