Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Shemita | Rabbi Joel Kenigsberg
42 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
And there are no saw sheets this
morning. Um I have saw sheets. I had
hoped to print but the technology
conspired against us. So we'll make do
with the we'll do this old school. There
are at the back if anybody doesn't have
and the rest of it will be bal which I
will share with you. I wanted to talk
this morning entitled to heroes of
restraint. Wanted to talk a little bit
about a mitzvah that we read about in
this week's para which seemingly is not
so relevant for most of us certainly in
our day-to-day lives. But I think when
we think about it and when we think a
little bit deeply, we'll see that there
is a very very uh deep connection
between this mitzvah, between the
lessons of it, what it's meant to teach
us, what it's meant to bring out within
us. And particularly, even though it
seems that it only applies to a very
small segment of the population, I think
we'll see that it applies to everybody,
applies particularly in our current
circumstances. And I'm talking about, if
you haven't guessed already, I'm talking
about the mitzvah of mitzvah
of opens up talking about this is one of
the main, it's mentioned a number of
places in the Torah, but this is one of
the main sources. We have the laws, the
details of mentioned yesterday between
those who were here that this is one of
the mitzvot where really the gap between
how and what it's meant to be and the
way the Torah envisions it and the way
that we practice it today. There's a
very very great gap between the two. But
we'll talk about the vision. We'll talk
about the way Shmita is meant to be in
the Torah. The lessons and some of the
difficulties, the challenges that raises
and what the lessons are for us today in
terms of that there is a puk
in amazing puk and then the midrash says
that this puk relates specifically to
the idea of specifically to those
farmers who are able to keep. It's not
an easy mitzvah at all. The says as
follows.
It
says speaks about the those heroes,
those heroes of strength who are the
ones who fulfill the word of Hashem who
listen to his words says the midrash
that this which sounds like it's talking
about the malim no less it says uses
that word that word malim angels can
refer to what we translate as angels ang
but it can mean also messengers of
Hashem. In this case, the midrash has an
argument. Is this puk referring
specifically to the angels or is it
referring to human beings that are
angelike? And who are the
says it
says it's talking about those who keep
the mitzvah of doesn't mean you walk
into the supermarket and you say I don't
need I'm buying this, I'm buying that.
That's not what it's talking about. But
it's talking about keeping. What does
keeping mean? It means you have a farmer
who works day and night, day in day out,
week in week out. Blood, sweat, and
tears and toil works in his farm for an
entire year. He has to say goodbye. Say
goodbye to the land. Say goodbye to the
produce. Say goodbye to any produce that
is made is completely healthcare. It's
ownerless. Anybody can come and take it.
You have to step aside. You have to
leave it aside. And the question is what
will be where how will we sustain what
will we eat? What will we live off for
an entire year of not working that out?
This is not a simple feat. This is not a
simple mitzvah. So says the midrash it
says person can do it for one day. Okay,
we know we have Shabbat six days a week.
We work one day we can we have so much
to do. We have so much that needs to get
done. How are we going to survive if we
don't work? One day a week we can we can
take off.
Okay, for one week for a month, but says
the midrash for a year, an entire year,
a person steps back, steps back from the
field, says I'm not going to touch it.
I'm going we all know mentioned
yesterday, we've all seen the signs.
You're driving on the highway, you see
the fields, it says, right? Sir, so that
says the midrash those people he says
that that are able to do that. That is
what the Torah refers to
as that's what I should say refers to
as it
says there is no greater hero there is
no greater gibbor than the person who is
able to
keep by the way where else do we find
it's very very interesting this puk that
talks about gibber refers to us for
fulfilling a certain mitzvah where else
do we find that this pasok of gibberak
refers to am is called certain groups
within Israel in what context the
context is. We're coming up to Shabot
the Shabbat. And if you had the S sheets
in front of you, you would see it. I
apologize. But the Shabbat talks about
this. It says the following. It
says at the time when we said before we
said at that time, what
happened? Aka voice from heaven came out
said who revealed to my children this
the secret the secret that who
knows this is what the angels say and it
says says the we
quote the same first that we're able to
say yes we will do we will accept we
will accept the before we even know what
is in it we are obligating ourselves
before we even know what we're
obligating setting ourselves for that is
the same. So interesting already that
the compares well we have the same
referring to those who are the gibber on
the one hand it's those who
keep and it's for keeping the Torah why
specifically of all the mitzvot what is
it about this one if you open up your
you'll see that this connection goes a
little bit further if you open up your
to the beginning
of so it's a it's a perk cafe the
beginning of parat And yeah, at the
beginning the Torah starts off talking
about the mitzvah of we move on to etc.
But the first
four it
says now that's a very very unusual
phraseology. We're used to the probably
the most common in the
Torah. That's by the way that's where
the name of the para comes from. It's
called phat bahar. Everybody thinks by
the parot the names of the parot is the
first word of the puk. It's not the
first word of the puk. Oh yeah it's 1 2
3 4 5. Okay. And it's always there's a
it could have been called but it's
called we would have a lot of but it's
so it
says speak to the Jewish people tell
them. Okay, here is the introduction.
We're being taught about the mitzvah of
which is called a Shabbat to Hashem.
What is the basic
mitzvah? Six years you'll plant in the
field for six years you'll plant in your
field in your vineyard. You will gather
up your
grain. The seventh year is a Shabbat
Shabbat. That is the
shabbat both to the
land. Okay, lots and lots and lots we
could talk about here. But the first
very interesting again those
words why does it say specifically why
does the Torah single out? Yeah, that
this is given at every mitzvah was given
at harina. So rashi you see in the you
have rashi underneath he says like this
and this has become this is a famous
famous rashi this has become sort of a
colloialism in modern Hebrew right and
in modern English as well
right asked the question what does have
to do with and again nowadays you're
talking about anything somebody asks you
saying it's another way of saying in
modern Hebrew what's one thing got to do
with the other you'll hear people saying
all the time and it's not Even not just
in the religious world you will say h
you say something it doesn't seem to
have any
connection it's become a become a phrase
but that just shows you what a great
question it is so he
says says were not all the given to
us just as we have all the principles we
have all the details We have all the
laws of relating to were given at so too
all the other so it's taught inatanim
not sure how rashi really answers the
question
weren't some of the mitzvah given in the
in the desert what was Mosha explaining
so it's true it's not it's not our topic
now it does say that that mara that
before there were certain mitzvah that
they were given a preview so to speak
before but all of the mitzvah that we
have we're oblig ated because we were
given ultimately at
hari but I think that rash's answer here
it doesn't really seem at least on the
surface doesn't really seem to answer
the question the question was why are
you telling me that why are you
mentioning sai specifically in the
context of answer is because everything
was given just like all the other med
doesn't really doesn't really seem to
answer it's kind of a circular but the
point is there is a deep connection
there is something about shmita
that is representative of all of the
mitzvot or there is something about that
is so central it's teaching us such an
important message that that we need to
look at as on the same level as harai
and as we saw before we have the
comparison between those who keep and
those who keep the entire Torah that is
why we're called so what is the message
over here what is the Torah trying to
teach us what is so unique what is so
special what makes one a hero for
keeping the shmita that makes one more
than anything else and that is something
that we are meant to uh take with us and
maybe uh teach us about the entire
entire Torah. So let's skip a few here.
I think there's a section and it's very
very interesting that these we would
expect this to appear right now right
now the very next we're going to see
we're going to skip
to but I would really have
expected what we're about to read to
have followed immediately after the
description of the laws of of it doesn't
we have a break we talk about your vow
we talk about a few other things and
then we get to there so let's look at
first of all
persecute persecute the near the
beginning still
of and after telling us the laws of the
basic laws of the Torah says like
this you will keep my laws
my and right all these different types
of
laws seemingly yeah where it says you'll
keep these laws it's referring to the
laws
of and you'll guard
them and you will sit safely in the
land. That word is very very
interesting. What does mean forever
[Music]
right? Secure safely, right? So you say
so so that's that is essentially that's
what Rashi says over here. Look at Rashi
on that. He
says, we'll see this in the next par
which we also read this week together in
we have the part of the is the land is
going to want for all the that we have
not kept the land is going to throw us
out as a result. So it
says in the sin of not keeping we go
into exile.
We had 70 years of ex
of 70 years of that we didn't keep.
Okay. So sounds like yeah it means
you'll be safe, you'll be secure, you
won't be thrown out, you won't be lost,
you won't be defeated,
etc. could mean something
else is the same root as the word of bet
meaning trust. Meaning maybe the message
over here is not just about external
safety or maybe external safety is
dependent on to an extent and our trust
in Hashem as well. And that we'll see
that is the going to be the central
message and the central idea here of the
let's see carry on in
the again it's repeated the next we have
that idea again. Now these are the three
I really want to focus on. Let's read
through and let's think about the
questions that spring to mind as we see
the Torah says something here very very
unique. We don't find this by any other
mitzvah and we could find it by many
other mitzvah but we find it says like
this. And if you will ask you will ask
what will we eat? What will we eat in
the seventh year?
What are we going to eat? We cannot
plant. We cannot gather up any of the
any of our crops, right? What are we
going to
do? Says Hashem, I will command my
blessing to
you in the sixth year.
In the sixth year, you'll have enough
produce. You'll have enough blessing.
It's going to last you for three
years. In the eighth year, you are going
to eat still. You'll still be eating
from that triple crop until you get to
the ninth
year. Until that comes along, you'll
still be eating from the old. Okay.
Torah says you're going to ask what will
you eat? What will you be able to have?
I'm giving you the answer. The answer is
you'll have a crop in six year for 3
years. Okay. I think there are a lot a
lot of questions that we can ask on
these. I have quite a few that I I'll
raise. But before I do that, let me open
it up. We read these three pukimm. What
are the questions that jump out at you?
What are the things that don't make
sense? What are the things that you
wonder? What are the what are the
questions that you would
ask? Not everybody at once.
a question.
Okay. So means that's if you go back to
the be what we said at the beginning the
idea
was and in the seventh year you won't
right. So it's the same telling us that
you can't plant three years worth
of of
crops. If there were only for one year,
right? If there's only for one year, why
do we need three years of crops? You
might have said that it's going to be
enough time for two years, right? Why do
we need for three? Okay, that's
definitely a question. And what are
these three years? When do they begin?
How do we count them? Etc. We'll get to
that. Yeah. What? Because the Jubilee
can come after. Okay. There is there is
such an opinion. We'll get to it. We'll
get to it soon. Yeah. Only God can give
a blessing like this at a human being
can never right only God can say I
promise you
right why doesn't he give the answer
before the question
why there's a question what do they what
are we going to eat in the seventh year
why do they have to why when he's
telling them the say and I'm going to
give you in the sixth year totally
whatever right right so I think this is
this is one of this One of the questions
that sticks out right we don't like I
said we could have asked this by any
other mitzvah in the Torah right there
are many many we have mitzvah there are
difficulties there are challenges we
don't find by any other mitzvah you'll
say it's going to be hard to keep this
mitzvah so I'll tell you only by do we
say it could have just said you're going
to keep there's an implicit question
which is what are you going to eat so
I'll tell you what you're going to eat
and that's fine why does the Torah go
out of its way to tell
us you're going to ask why you should
eat I mean I would even ask more
strongly. I would say do we have the
right let's say in the sixth year we
don't have a big harvest we have a
normal harvest we have the right to say
we don't have to
keep didn't give us extra food we're
going to have to now plant the next two
years we don't
have you didn't do your part we don't
have to do our part okay it's quite a
daring interpretation but it's yeah okay
interesting it's a it's a it's a breed
right you you told us straight out we're
going to have three years worth of food
so you're saying we have we have one
year for two years. So you're saying
keep planting. So you're saying by the
fact that has given us a promise, it has
almost made
our requirement ability to give the mid
condition. Okay. Okay. Interesting. All
of a
f no straight out. It's does the word
lea refer to the year aftermita when
certain things have to be kept uh sacred
like you can't throw away leftover wine
in the bottle till it rots till it yeah
is referring to I'm not sure if I'm not
sure if LA over here is referring to
that but that is that is definitely
something which uh which applies okay so
let's all right so so let's try and dive
a little bit deeper into this let's See
first of all the question is let's just
understand what the framework is what
are we talking about when the Torah says
yeah three years what are these three
years and why do we need three years and
when is it talking about so here we have
an very interesting uh an interesting
dispute between Rashi and the Ramban as
to what as to when these three years are
rashi says the following he says you can
see Rashi at the bottom of
inf says shalim it's a little bit
But I'll read it out loud. He
says, okay, so first of all, Rashi says
when it says three years, it's not
exactly 3 years, it's 2 and 1/2 years.
He says it's part of the sixth year and
the seventh and the
eighth. Essentially, what Rash is saying
is like this. You can't you'll have to
pl when can you start planting again?
You'll only be able to plant in the
eighth year. So in the eighth year
you'll plant but then it's going to take
time before what you've planted in that
year is going to right. So therefore he
says when you get to the ninth year you
get
tokot remember is that's the time when
we gather up everything we've planted.
So you get tokot of the nth then you'll
have enough you'll be able to bring it
into the house and then you'll be okay.
But he he so he understands that 3 years
is a little bit less than 3 years. It's
really 2 and a half. Um but it counts
for every every
uh as normal. The Ramban on the other
hand says no. He says really what was
suggested here for the year you're only
you're only going you're losing one
year. So you'll need a double crop
you'll have for two years that will make
up for it. When do I need a triple crop?
When do I need for three years? That is
not an ordinary but that is when I have
the ye that also explains to us maybe
why these only appear later on after
we've had the discussion of the what is
the yl we have the is once every seventh
years we count seven cycles of shmita 7
* 7 is 49 and then we have the 50th year
which is the y which has other laws as
well regarding land which goes back to
its original owners regarding slaves
going free but also all the laws of
resting the land applies in the yo as
Well, so you have a situation where you
have year number 49 and year number 50
where you have two years in a row where
no one's working the land. Okay. So if
we say that one year we can get away two
years that's that that's what are we
going to eat if we're not working
anything for two years. So there says
the Ramban that's where we need it.
That's where we need the third uh the
extra the extra uh crop for three years.
Okay. But he says otherwise it's just
going to be a blessing for two years. In
other words, also what emerges is maybe
it's
saying you're going to say what can we
eat even ordinary that we can that we
can get by that we can we can survive
with but when it's going to be double
maybe that's a bit harder. Yeah. I'm
still not clear exactly what is the
exact
point in other
words we
gain like what do we gain from
So there so so so there are many things
and we could look at the different we
could look at the different par in the
Torah that talk about and different
aspects that we uh different aspects
that we get from it. One is similarly to
the idea of Shabbat that just like the
idea of Shabbat, there are six days that
I work and there is one day that I rest
to remember the fact that it's not us
that's in charge. It's not us that owns
it's it's who is the owner of all the of
all the land and the world and we cannot
do anything that without without him. So
too the idea by that's something the
writes there are many other there are
there are societal aspects as well the
fact that you're not working for a year
what are you going to do with that time
and learning Torah etc okay there are
different there are different aspects
but right now let's focus a little bit
more on this question of this question
of this question of there is another
there's another question which I'm rais
very very interesting okay which we
didn't address which is the following
what we're saying is this we're saying
that you're going to get to the you're
going to
according to Raan it's going to be
difficult to keep because we need what
are we going to eat so we need an extra
that comes
from and we'll have that extra with the
double crop the triple crop whatever it
may be when is this question asked this
question when you'll come and you'll ask
what are we going to eat when are we
asking this question okay sorry when
you're hungry when you're hungry
Okay, what do I what do I mean by that?
And I explain. Let me read you the way
that the ask question is very
interesting. He says like this says he
says you're going to ask what are we
going to eat on the seventh
year. Okay. The way the p if you read if
you read the p it says you will ask what
will we
eat? what will in the seventh year. So
there's two ways you could read that.
You could read that as we'll ask what
are we going to eat in the seventh year
or you could ask it in the seventh year
when we get to the seventh year you ask
what will we eat. Okay? So that might be
right you're going to ask we're going to
get to the okay now we have to put down
all our tools. Now we have to put up our
big signs that says that's very nice but
now you're going to ask what are we
going to eat? So here's the question.
Here's the question. If it really is at
the beginning of the seventh year that
we're going to ask what are we going to
eat, we really shouldn't be asking that
question at all. It's the eighth year
when because every year we're eating the
produce from the year before. So since
we're not doing any work on the seventh
year, it's the eighth year when you're
going to have nothing to eat because
Okay, but more but more than that. more
than that because you could say okay
we've still got at the beginning of the
seventh year we've still got the food
we've still got food for the next year
so it's only but you're going to say
okay we're going to stop now in a year's
time we're not going to have any food to
eat right but so here's what the kaka
says and it's so obvious when you think
about it read the what did the Torah
guarantee us and say what's the answer
to the question of what are you going to
eat what's the answer
in the six year you're going to have
produce you're going to have enough
you're going to have enough for three
years let's go with Russia for the
moment. Okay. So, when is that produce
going to come in? You're going to have
all that produce at the end of the sixth
year. So, you get to the seventh year.
You get to the beginning of the schmita
and then you're about to put down your
tools. You say, "Wait a minute. What are
we going to eat?" You go, you look in in
the storehouses. You look you say,
"We've got a triple crop in here. We've
got enough food." Do do you see the
problem? You see, if the Torah is
telling us, you're going to ask the
question of what will you have to eat?
And my answer to you is you'll have
enough to eat. I promise you. Because if
you keep the shmita in the sixth year
before the shmita starts, you're going
to have a triple produce. You have
enough food. So when shmita begins,
you've already had the braha. You've
already seen I've blessed you that
you've got enough food to eat for the
next 3 years. Okay? So at the beginning
of the seventh year, you're going to
look in the storehouses. You're going to
see that you've got enough food. You're
going to see you've got triple the
amount that you normally have. And then
you're going to raise up your hand and
you're going to say, "Ah, what are we
going to eat? We've been watching too
much news, right?
Jews have been complaining about
something to complain about.
We complain anyway.
So that's what the question is when when
do we keep shift on the sixth year? No,
starts in the seventh year. But again,
but don't we gather for the seventh
year, the three years before? Correct.
That's exa that's exa that's exactly the
point. That's exactly what the kaka
says. He says you can't read the puk in
the simple way. You can't read it as
saying again, look at
the You can't read it as saying or
you're going to ask at the beginning of
the seventh year, what are we going to
eat? Because already at the beginning of
the seventh year, you should know you've
got enough, right? You should know
you've got enough. That that's the
braha. It already comes before. What
else is interesting about this? If this
is the case, so we're saying the braha,
Hashem is giving us the braha before
we've even started to fulfill the
mitzvah. That's very strange. That's
very interesting. That was a question.
Yeah. My question to you is this is not
a hypothetical question. What has
happened in Israel in the last 70 years?
Some of
the agriculture people do keep shita. So
there must be some lack of products.
Okay. So that's a very so that's that's
a very interesting question. I don't
know if we'll now go into all details
exactly how we keep shmita nowadays but
I I'll I'll tell you two things. One is
that somebody actually mentioned to me
yesterday and I saw that I saw there are
there are reports there are amazing
stories of you know nowadays not
everybody keeps shmita there are farmers
we've all se again we've all seen the
signs shout out to the signs again right
we've all seen there and there are those
who say comes we're leaving our land for
a year and that's it okay there are
amazing stories of certain and certain
farms and certain places where they saw
they say they saw the they didn't for
whatever reason the rain came and the
conditions and whatever and the
following year they had they had a
tremendous crop which other places did
not. That's number one. We've seen it
and there are people who can tell you
the story and that they have they have
experienced. That is number one. Number
two is h notwithstanding what I just
said this none of this may apply today
because nowadays is actually not a
mitzvah on a dita level. Soon it will be
but right now it's not. Why is that?
Because applies when we say when what's
called which means the majority of the
Jewish people are living in the land of
Israel. Don't get this is the it doesn't
mean the state of Israel is the country
in the world that has the largest Jewish
population. But that's different. We're
not saying country number one. We're
saying the majority of the Jewish people
once the majority of the Jewish people
are living in the land of Israel. So
then it becomes da again and then it's a
whole different ball game. If nowadays
we keep itan does the Torah does the
braha of the Torah apply in a situation
where so that's a fascinating question
some say yes some say no it may not be
and that is why today in the interim we
have all sorts of interim solutions
right which we mentioned and and other
things which we do nowadays and there
are ways of kind of getting around it
but uh ultimately that this is the uh
this is the way the Torah wants wants us
to keep it so and we'll get there. We'll
get there. We're not there yet, but
every year there is a there is
discussion and there is there there are
plans in terms of gradually how to get
more and more farmers to be keeping
Shmita fully in this way and how we uh
how we how we deal with that. So, so, so
when are we asking this question? So,
there are so so the the clear says it
can't be that we're asking the question
at the beginning of the seventh year
because the braha of the triple crop
must come beforehand and therefore
there's no room to ask the question
because you can already see it. So he
says you when are you asking the
question? Maybe you're asking the
question earlier, maybe you asked the
question a different time. Um okay,
maybe at the beginning of the sixth
year, whatever that that is one that is
one understanding. But there are those
who understand who read the literally
that
says that when you get to the seventh
year, you're going to ask the question,
what do we have to eat? So why would we
be asking the question of what we have
to eat at the beginning of the seventh
year if we've already had the bra of the
triple crop. So either we could say
because we like to complain. Okay. But
I'd like to suggest something different
which is the following. And the says
this and listen to what listen to what
the says. He
says you're going to come and you're
going to ask what will we
eat when this will be a doubt for you.
you like to
complain and you won't have the faith,
you won't have the you won't have the
trust that
what that the small amount that you have
will be enough. In other words, he says
and we see this throughout the as well.
He says the question here, the question
of the it's not necessarily a
qualitative question, but it's a
quantitative question. It says in the
that in a time of where there are such
curses. You might have you could have
all the bread that you need, but it
won't satisfy you. It won't satiate you.
There's a there's a what's called
a it's not just about what you have, but
it's about what you do with it and how
you're able to use it. So he says says
the say others the over. It's not a
clearly explicit supernatural thing that
we'll see three times as much. We'll
have the same amount of crops, but you
know what? the same amount of crops that
will be enough for not that you'll go
hungry, but you'll be able to you'll be
able to make do with less and that will
the the braha the riboy will be
qualitative but it won't be quantitative
and therefore you'll be okay. So you
won't necessarily that can answer your
question as well. You won't we won't
necessarily see the difference at the
beginning of the seventh year. We won't
necessarily know that it's there but
but but but it will be that will be the
that will be the miracle and that will
be that will be the braha. Yeah.
The what what are the farmers going to
do? You know what are how will they have
an income in year? So they're all
they're not working. They're not working
the land. That's right. They're not
working. They're not working the land.
the braha there will be there will be
the braha of the triple crop and they
will sit in your shiva for the year.
That's the that's the that
will sit in your shiva for the year. Oh
yeah, that's the that's the that's the
idea. It's a good question because you
just said that it will be uh the quality
that we will be able to do with less. So
the farmers did not have more produce in
the six years. So they won't have money
in the 70s. No. So he's saying so so
what he's saying is well the truth the
truth is that there are two ways under
that what he's saying is that there will
be the braha that there won't there
won't be more and there are those who
say actually if there's going to be more
then it means you have to work harder
and there's not going to be more qual
quantitatively that you have to work
harder but there will be the braha that
what you have will be enough nobody's
going to go hungry everybody's going to
have enough the amount that normally
would have lasted for one year is
actually going to last going to last for
three years that is one way of reading
it but you could read it another way as
well and this is where things get really
interesting Okay. Where he says when we
we ask the question as follows. We don't
find this where the Torah comes along
and says to us explicitly, you're going
to ask how will you keep this mitzvah?
We don't find that anywhere else, right?
And there are other mitzvah that are
that are maybe equally challenging or
maybe less challenging, but Shabbat, the
Torah commands about Shabbat. It's not
so easy here. We're talking about an
entire year, but it's not so easy to
take a day off work, right? We all know
the stories, particularly in America,
right? That going back a couple of
generations, people couldn't get a job.
People get fired every week. It's not on
Saturday, don't come back Monday.
Exactly. It's not It's It's not so easy.
So, we don't find And there are many,
many other examples. Eating kosher.
Whatever. The Torah doesn't say
anywhere kosher, right? You can only eat
A, B, and C, but you can't eat X, Y, and
Zed. So, you're going to say, "What are
we going to eat?" Right? Torah doesn't
say that. It says, "This is what you can
eat. Deal with it." Shabbat, it doesn't
say you're going to you can work for six
days. You can't work the seventh. If
you're going to ask, "But what are we
going to do on the seventh day? How are
we going to get a job? Torah doesn't say
that. It says just do this. It doesn't
say you have to put on whatever you're
going to ask how am I going to put on?
How am I going to afford an airro? How
am I going to do? Torah doesn't ask any
of those things. It's only that it
says and we ask a question why does it
try to emphasize this over here. Why
does it say so? There are two radically
different schools of thought very very
interesting on this question. One school
of thought says what we probably would
have thought of intuitively which is you
know what is different is difficult. We
saw the midrash we saw the we saw how is
compared to
eta the level of faith that is required
to take an entire year sbatical not to
work the land whether it's because of
income or because of what you have to
eat or this is something that's on
another level. So if it's only natural
here, it's much much more difficult. And
therefore, you're going to say you'll
ask the question. That's the most
natural thing that you would ask the
question. The Torah almost expects you
to ask the question. And because it
expects you to ask the question, it's
going to preempt. It's going to tell you
and it's going to give you an and it's
going to give you an answer. In other
words, when we talk about faith, what
does faith mean? What does mean? And
throughout the ages, we see different
schools of thought and different ideas
in this. Does faith mean that I can't
have any questions? Does faith mean that
I can't there are no challenges? I have
to just accept that everything is fine
and everything is easy and everything.
No. According to this understanding, we
say no. Faith means faith is real. Faith
is genuine. I struggle. I wrestle. God
gives me a command, a command that seems
like I don't know how I'm going to be
able to fulfill it. And therefore, I ask
a
question. And therefore, the Torah gives
us the answer. That's one way of looking
at it.
There is another interpretation over
here which looks at this and
says not that that is not that that is a
positive thing. There are those
say the quotes this in the name of his
brother and he says when the Torah
says it's telling you you shouldn't have
asked the question and he he connects to
this for like this he says had you not
he says if you're going to come and ask
the question and you're going to say
what are we going to eat so you know
what then I'll give you a braha then
I'll make a miracle for you then you'll
have three times the amount of crop at
the beginning of the of the seventh year
whenever you'll see there's not or
earlier on you'll see there's not enough
you'll ask the question so then I'll
make an explicit miracle for you but had
you not asked the question had you just
had the faith had you been the had you
been able to accept that this is what
the Torah said and if that's what the
Torah said then obviously that's what
you need to do and then it will be fine
so then you would have had the you
wouldn't have seen three times three
times the crop but you know what
everything would have been enough
everything would have been enough and
you would have uh and and you would
managed. In other words, two complete
two radically different uh ways of
understanding this question that it's a
legitimate question that it's something
that you should be asking or that it's
something that if you don't you
shouldn't have asked but if you do ask
so then fine says then I'll do a miracle
for you but really you didn't need it
you shouldn't have needed it and this
brings to
mind tells it tells a fascinating
story if if you want to look it up it
says like
There was a certain individual, a tragic
story, a certain person. He had a child.
He had a baby and his wife died and
there was no way they didn't have a
materna or baby formula in those days.
He needed to feed the child. He had no
one who was able to feed the
child. He couldn't hire a wet nurse. He
didn't couldn't afford it. So what
happened? A miracle was done for this
person, this man.
A miracle was done and this individual
was able to feed his child himself. So
thou says the like this listen to the
the the discussion
of says wow this person this is a
tremendous individual he didn't have
anything he asked the question what are
we going to feed this miracle was done
nature was changed for him that's a sign
of a lofty individual what a
miracle says completely the opposite
He says how lowly is this person that an
open miracle like this had to be done
for him that you don't believe that has
a way of providing you don't believe
that somehow within the natural course
of the world things for you are
something different for you we have to
change
everything so uh so so and and that
relates exactly to our question here of
uh of of what is and what we should and
how we should how we should conduct
ourselves. Now the truth is I think that
the these are two very very extreme
approaches and for most people the truth
is probably somewhere in the middle. Um
but thinking of all of this and thinking
about this message of and what it tells
us and what it challenges us and what it
makes us think and question in terms of
and what we face. I think something that
comes out of this is that teaches us
shows us a prototype for a situation
that is very very uncertain and even
where we have the even when the Torah
tells us right you're going to go you're
not the Torah is setting us up in a
position where things are uncertain
where we don't know what the outcome is
where it's not clear and we are required
at a certain level to put faith and and
and to trust in to do our effort in this
case what is our effort out in this what
makes it so difficult is that your
effort in the time of your effort is not
doing anything. There is a time when you
have to stop. There is a time when you
have to let go and there is a time when
you have to say I'm leaving it in the
hands of whatever whatever that means.
Again, I'm not getting into now
technicalities day by day what a person
has to don't don't don't understand the
wrong way. But here we're following the
Torah's explicit command which is saying
there is an element where you have to
let go of control and you have to
let do do what he does. And that when
you're able to do that, when you're able
to reach that level, to relinquish that
control and to find that faith, however
you find that faith, it's an ordeal. No
question that it's an ordeal, but you're
able to do that. That is what's
called And I thought I thought to myself
that this idea, this model, this
prototype of the farmer in the facing
this uncertainty and being able to trust
and being able to have faith that
essentially that is the prototype. No
one in the room is a farmer, I don't
think. Right? Even if you are, as we've
explained, the way that we keep the
Shmita today is not the way that it was
kept in the way that the that the Torah
describes it. But that idea and that
principle and finding that faith and
living through that and living through
that uncertainty, being able to manage
and being able to survive and to thrive
and to grow through that, that I think
is what we're all going through and that
I think is what we've all been going
through for the last year and a half. So
I thought I think this is a little bit
of a preview for the Shabot year. For
those of you that are going to be here
for
shavat don't shave I'm talking about AI.
AI is very very hot topic at the moment.
We're going to be talking about it from
a slightly different angle from I want
to talk about if you if you're here
going to talk about what AI is doing to
us and how it is changing us and how
it's affecting us and how our norms and
societal norms and hakic norms and human
norms are changing because of the way
that we're using AI. So that's something
that's just a little bit of a preview
for uh for Shabot at night.
after the during the time during the
tick now whatever the time that's in the
middle of the night yeah I don't
remember right now what what time it is
but I thought so one of the things that
everybody wants to know is can I get is
AI going to two years ago I spoke about
whether AI is going to replace rabbis
and thankfully then the answer and now
still now the answer is no not for the
moment I'm still here as you can see but
uh I can and I can tell you AI does not
rhyme my sharim for me and AI does not
rhyme my drshot for me I promise um at
the moment. But I thought, okay, I
thought about this idea and I what I did
was I uploaded the the saw sheet which
you haven't seen but which I've been
reading off onto AI and I discussed I
gave it a bit of a prompt told them what
the pro what the idea was behind the
shar and what the idea behind the
discussion was and I said okay give me
five points let's make a comparison
between the ordeal that is faced by the
farmer in the shita and the ordeal that
faces all of us today. Okay, I could
have done this myself, but I thought it
would be it would be interesting to see
what it came up with. And what I came up
with was not bad. And I want to read
this to you and I want to share this to
share this with you and offer you as as
you know some things to think about in
terms of so this is a table which was
gen again was generated by AI but with
with some of my prompts and a little bit
of editing called the war in Israel. So
on the one hand we have the farmer's
ideal and we have
Isra the nation's ordeal. So what are
the things that are similar? what are
the things that we can learn? So number
one, the first point that I came up with
was letting go of control. And I think
this is something that we've uh as much
as we think that we understand this, we
are taught again and again and again.
But it said letting go of control. Says
the farmer relinquishes his land, his
income and his sense of security. And so
too in our situation, we face national
vulnerability. We surrender routine
life, stability, and security in the
face of war. Okay, that was one that was
one uh comparison. Number two, we talk
about uncertainty. It's similar but
slightly different nuance. Uncertainty
about the future. When the farmer asks
the question what we saw says, what will
we eat? Manal this a question which is
not just logistical. This is
existential. So too today we face
uncertainty in every gener in every
direction. What will be hostages,
borders, international pressure,
long-term recovery, etc. But that's
essentially that's the question we're
asking. What will what will be? And I
think that in our generation certainly I
think we have to go with the
interpretation that this is a legitimate
question. It's a question we should be
asking. It's fine. It's fair. We can be
asking and struggling and grappling with
it. But ultimately Hashem will answer.
Number three.
Number three it talks about faith. It
says over here that the the farmer acts
before seeing results. Right? something
we we mentioned how how we we get the uh
we only necessarily uh feel the braha
afterwards right according to one of the
interpretations and so too today we talk
about acts of faith of people going out
sacrificing serving without knowing
where where what it's going to lead okay
talks there's a little bit of repetition
over here it talks about sacrifice
ongoing sacrifice and clear results and
then it talks about kura strength kura
through restraint on the one hand the
farmer's strength As we said and this is
maybe a again another takeaway message
the strength over here normally we think
that strength isn't acting by the far
the lesson is the strength is in not
acting not doing anything not to plant
not to harvest to wait and see what
happens over here so what did it come up
with it said endurance the nation's
strength is in holding strong not giving
in to despair or division etc okay so
that's what AI came up with I'm sure you
could come up with more things and we
could Maybe we could come up with with
better. But uh anyway, those are those
are some of the lessons. Those are some
of the comparisons. The question of is
not just something that talks to a small
segment. It's not just something that
talks to the farmers. But as we said,
just as Shmita was given, so to the
entire Torah was given at the message of
Gibbor for all the Jewish people, able
to keep the Torah, able to persevere
through through uncertainty with faith,
not always knowing the answer to the
question of but nonetheless knowing that
says to
us, if we keep we we hold fast, we keep
keep the faith and uh persevering and
with resilience even though times may be
tough, even though there may be
questions even though there may be
challenges it may not always be explicit
that the answer is there but sometimes
the brah's already been provided
sometimes already been hit be it's there
it's hidden we just have to hold hold
faith and uh and know that it will come
okay you know but the