Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Rebuilding The Mikdash | Rabbi Joel Kenigsberg | July 23, 2025
156 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, good morning everybody. Thank
you for coming. It's my honor to present
the final share of this term and I was
asked to mention this all the learning
today is sponsored by Mark and Debra Zar
for the Lishat for the odds of Mark's
parents Kmani
and Esther Mosha both of his yards fall
in the uh in the coming week all the
learning we'll do this morning
topic today topical for this time of
year is about rebuilding the mikdash I
think that if we think about one of of
the most famous statements, one of the
most famous words of sentences of Kazal
relating to this time of year is what
what we find in the we find in the says
every generation in which the mikdash
has not been rebuilt and uh it's not yet
been rebuilt. It is if that generation
has destroyed it. It's as if that we are
right now destroying it causing it to be
destroyed by our actions. And the
question of course is what are those
actions that have caused that to be
destroyed and how can we change them?
How can we correct them in order to
build it? Now give us explanations
behind this. They give us in two two
types of reasons. It's very interesting.
On the one hand we find and I'm not
going to talk about this at length
today. We spoke about it in a previous
year. But uh we find throughout kazal
different broad principles broad
explanations. The maida mikdash was
destroyed because of AB and C right most
famous
etc. There are other explanations as
well. That's one category. But we find
as well that went in a different route
to explain to us. They told us stories.
They told us stories. They gave us
examples of specific occurrences which
happened and they said because of this
the beta mdash was destroyed. Because of
that yushim was destroyed. And it seems
very very strange. You have an anecdote.
You have a historical anecdote. You know
there was a party somewhere. There were
two people had a bit of a fight and
because of that the entire Jewish people
goes into exile for centuries. It seems
a little bit far-fetched. So have a look
to this handout you've got in front of
you. Source number one
that he gave for
he talks about this. He says what are
trying to teach us is the following.
I want us to look not look at you know
historical causes, geopolitical causes.
Those things may be relevant as well and
there may be a place for that but
there's something far deeper. The
question is what is the spiritual cause?
What is the spiritual root? What are we
doing? What have we been doing? So we
look at these stories. The story is
giving us a prototype. It's giving us an
example. It's teaching us about the
behavior that existed the type of
society that existed and the type of
society that we have to correct. So
source number one he says
he's relating to a very very famous
story which we'll get to in a moment.
Before
we get into anything, before we get into
the story, we see something here that'll
teach us. He says, "You tell me they're
talking about the destruction. They're
talking about the cause of the exile."
And again, you could analyze it as a
historical story and you could see the
battles and the military and so you had
the military analysts in those days like
you have in these days and they should
have conquered this, they should have
fought. Yeah. etc. But he says that's
not what Kazal tells us. It's not that's
not what interests them.
We don't find that the Quran talks about
how evil the Babylonians were and how
evil the Romans were. There are elements
of that, but that's not the main focus.
So
we focus on what did we do wrong? What
were the mistakes that we made? What
were the right
which ultimately brought brought upon us
this destruction?
We don't just remember the destruction.
We don't just remember the fact those
who sent us out into exile. There are
places and there are times when we have
that. By the way, we have a mitzvah. I'm
sure you all remember to remember
Amalecch. Remember what Amalecch did to
you. There we do have to remember. But
the reason we have to remember maybe is
because we need to remember that evil
exists in the world so that we know how
to fight against or we know that we have
to fight against it. We've seen in our
days how easy that is to forget how many
people miss that message. But that's one
aspect. But yet there's something
deeper.
This is a time of reflection. It's a
time of truva. It's a time we have to
find what we have done wrong and how we
can and how we can fix that. And that's
that that's the root of it. So what I
want to do this morning, I want to just
learn together with you a story which
you all know I'm sure, but it's a story
that every time we open it up, you know,
there are so many layers to Torah. We
look at the story and maybe look at it
from perspectives that we haven't seen
before. Maybe read through critically,
ask the questions, ask what it's doing
here. Ask that there are so many
unanswered questions in the story. And
as we explore, as we can try and
understand, gain a deeper understanding
for how it relates to all of us
practically today. The story is Kaman
Baram. We've all heard the story of
Kaman and Barakama. Very, very strange
names. We'll get to in a moment. But the
Giten What I suggest, let's begin. Let's
read through the story. Let's read it
together again with an open mind,
critical thought. I'm going to
afterwards open it up to the floor for
questions that people have about the
story. we won't uh we won't be able to
answer all of them but we can pull out
some things that can help us understand
really what are trying to teach us and
how can we can we change our lives and
how can we live our lives based on the
lessons that we learn here the first
thing I'll say just before we start
reading inside is that you read a story
like this and what's what does everybody
want to do what's the first question
that you ask yourself is whose fault was
it right who is wrong over here and
we're very good spoke about this on
Shabas but we're very good at pointing
ing fingers at other people at finding
fault with other people. In fact, one of
the themes of the story is that when you
read through, you'll notice everyone in
the story blames somebody else. Nobody's
willing to take responsibility for what
they did. And it may be that other
people are at fault as well. Other
people have responsibility, but there's
nothing I can do about somebody else's
responsibility. I cannot force them to
take responsibility, but I can force
myself. I can take responsibility for
what I've done wrong. And if the way
that we look at if our perspective is
I'm perfect but look at what they've
done and I'm perfect and look at what
he's done and I'm perfect and look at
what she's done then we're never going
to get anywhere. And I think that's part
of the message exactly what Kazal is
teaching us in the story. I think you
know this comes up because it's also not
clear when we read the story we'll say
who's at fault. It's not there are many
there are many possibilities. There are
many characters you could blame. And
part of the reason it's ambiguous I
think is on purpose. You look at for
example the story of Ysef the selling of
Ysef in Kamashit. So who's responsible?
Whose fault was it? Who sold him? Even
the very question the very question of
who was the one who picked Ysef up from
the boar and sold him off as a slave? We
don't know the answer to that. It might
have been the brothers. It might have
been that according to the Rashbam, they
didn't plan to sell him at all. A band
of of traveling nomads came past. They
picked him up. They came back to the
pit. He wasn't there. We don't know why
is the text so ambiguous. Maybe it's
ambiguous. Part of the reason is whether
it was you who did it directly to the
final act or not, you all bear some
responsibility. At the end of the day,
it doesn't matter whose fault it was. It
was everybody's fault to a certain
degree. It's the same thing in our days.
If we all, you know, if we get through
Shab and all I can think of in Tishab is
how much other people are at fault. I've
completely missed the point. Completely
missed the point. But let's look through
and again there are different elements
and as I said in a previous year as well
there will be different elements of
responsibility and different things
which different people have done they
may not all relate to me specifically
individually but the question is I read
through what are the things that I am at
fault for where can I take
responsibility okay so let's go through
let's go let's read the the gamarra
source number two and as I say keep an
open mind and think about the questions
which will pop up there are many
questions that pop up so the garin says
like this it says I come to
over Kamsa and Baramsa
was destroyed already in that heading
there is a lot there is a lot to to be
unpacked remember it's
okay and the story goes as follows the
ramps
there was a certain individual
the calls him he had an ally who was
called Kamsa and he had an enemy who was
called Barama. Okay, first question at
this point, first question that jumps
out at me is who is Huggafra.
He is one of the central character, one
of the central characters in the story,
this host, we don't know who he is. He
doesn't have a name. Very, very strange.
Whoever he is, okay, but he has a that
that's how we begin. and says the
so he had a meal, he had a suda, he had
a feast, he had a banquet, maybe he had
a dinner, maybe he was fundraising, I
don't know what it was, but he had a big
a big event.
So he said to his servant, zilam,
go and invite Kamsa, go and tell Kamsa
to come to the party.
And the servant went and he brought
bars. Okay, so what do we think? It's an
innocent mistake. It could have happened
to anybody, right?
So really at this point I'll challenge I
think the the this shame the servant as
he get maybe he gets off a little bit
easy if he is a close attendant of this
person. So the Quran begins by telling
us this person he had friends he had
enemies presumably he's a wealthy person
he's a wellto-do this person manages his
affairs or he's at the very least
somewhat involved. He knows he know this
is a big deal. It's not just that
happens to be a bump as we'll see from
the rest of the story. It's not just
somebody that he doesn't like. There's
there's something going on between them.
And therefore, the servant should know a
little bit better. At the very least, he
should know that bump is not at least
asked a question. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> So, so that's very very interesting. The
benada says that the benada says that
these names Kam and Baram say that Baram
was actually the son of the son of Kam.
Um
>> disconnected.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Very much.
>> Very much very very much so.
>> Right. Okay. So there's All right. So
there's Okay. So So there are four pe
There are four people so far. There are
four people who have been mentioned in
the story. In fact, four people have
been mentioned, but only only two of
them have appeared in the story so far.
There are two people called Kamsa and
Baramsa. Okay. Then there is a third
person. There is the host. He's he's
he's nameless. The host of the party is
nameless. We don't know his name. The
doesn't tell us. The says, which means
that man. So there was that man. That
man is hosting a party. What we know is
that this person who's hosting the party
has a friend. He has an ally who is
called Kamsa. He has an enemy who is
called Baramsa. Barakamsa may be the son
of Kamsa. We don't find that. It doesn't
say that anywhere explicitly, but it's
an interesting point. Again, the names
are very, very similar. The word bar in
Aramaic is Ben in Hebrew, which means he
is the son of like Raishimon,
right? So, so it could be, but we'll
leave that for the moment. And then
there is the servant. There's the
attendant, the one who's going out,
who's handing out the invitations to the
party. So, the host says to his servant,
he says, "I want you to go and invite my
ally, my friend. Kamsa to come to the
party. The servant goes and he invites
Barakamsa. Okay, he invites the enemy.
He invites the wrong person. We'll see
in a moment what happens when the wrong
person comes to the dinner. Okay, but I
was just making the point that you could
read it and you could say, okay, he
wasn't listening. He wasn't paying
attention. He thought, he thought, he
didn't hear what I think that if we if
we're honest and we think about it, it
makes more sense. It's more reasonable
to suggest that he should have known
better, that he should have understood
that it's it's a very strange thing.
He's going to invite his enemy to this
party. At the very least, ask the
question, "Excuse me, Mr. Howra, are you
sure you want to invite him? What's
going on?" Yeah.
>> Uh,
>> you're saying he went to the right
person, but but he
the door
and the person
I'm also
family whatever I'm
>> okay
so he hands him the invitation walks
away and doesn't know the difference
between one
>> okay maybe that's interesting it's a
novel approach I've never heard that
before but it's possible yeah okay
No, no, we don't know. We don't know his
name. He's called Huggabra, and it's
it's it's remarkable because he's one of
the most central characters in the
story. Okay, we'll come back to the to
the names a little bit later on. So, so
we're now on the third line.
>> As far as we know, no, we aren't we
aren't told.
>> Um, it's possible they were, it's
possible they weren't. We don't know.
Again, there's a lot more about the
story that we don't know than that we do
know. But let's but let's continue. So,
we say, "So, he goes, he comes." In
other words, the enemy comes to this
event
and the host sees that he's sitting
there, right? He has this is his big
day. This is big dinner. There's been
months and months of planning that's
gone into this. Um, and he sees his
enemy sitting there and he says,
I'll translate. He walks up to him. The
host comes along to Bokam and
essentially he says, "What are you doing
here?" Right? And not in the most polite
way. He says, "You're not my friend.
You're my enemy. You shouldn't be here.
Get up and go. Get out." Okay. Now, this
is where things start to take a downward
spiral.
Says, "Look, you know, I'm here. I've
come." If it was in the first place.
Interestingly that he doesn't say to him
again the whole why doesn't he just turn
to him and say what am I doing here you
invited me that's why I'm here but he
doesn't say that he says he says since
I'm here
he says I'm here already just please
just just let me stay I'll even I'll pay
for my meal I'll pay for everything I've
eaten everything I've drank I'll pay for
you just let me stay
low he says
He says, "Okay, this is about money.
This is about, you know, this is a
financial thing. You know what? I'll pay
you for half of the half of the event."
He says, "No." So says, "Okay, look."
Says, "I will pay you for the entire
meal, for the entire banquet, thousands
and thousands of shekels, however much
it costs, I'll pay. just please don't
embarrass me. You can, you know, you can
you read these words, you can hear the
pleading. You can almost feel the sense
of embarrassment. He's turning red in
the face. It's in the middle of the of
of the event. He's making a big scene.
He's saying, "Please, I'm just I'm here.
Just let me stay." Amar, you all know
the answer. Look, he says, "No,
he picks him up and he takes him out."
Whether he picked him up, he got the the
gods or whatever, but he takes him and
he takes him out of the out of the
banquet.
Okay, that's the first part of the
story. Now,
>> yeah,
>> you said a few minutes ago that
he didn't say anything in the beginning
like, wait a minute, I have an
invitation. You look, you know, or he
didn't bring it with him, but he says,
>> I have an invitation. Your servant
brought it to me
>> to invite me here. So, I don't know what
you're about why didn't that transaction
happen?
>> Okay, so that's a very good question.
Either either it happened and we aren't
told about it or we we're not the fact
that we're not told about it suggests
that it didn't happen and that that
that's already a question, right? You
can ask you can the whole
>> deal with that question.
>> Well, we're dealing with the question
now. We're learning, right? The whole
the whole interaction that takes place
has bizarre. He's like come to he knows
he's an enemy of this person. So, you're
coming in. What's the first thing you're
going to do? You're going to come to the
banquet. You're going to come you're
going to bring your gift. You're going
to go up to so and so and you're gonna
say to Mr. Hau Gavra who's hosting the
party, right? And he say, "Thank you so
much. Thank you for inviting me. This
can be the beginning of our
reproachment. This can be the beginning
of H." But he doesn't do that. He just
goes and he sits down and eats. And then
the person comes up to him and seemingly
this is exactly that opportunity to
start to say, "Okay, look, whatever
happened between us is water under the
bridge. Let's, you know, bygones be
bygones, whatever you want to say, you
know, find the appropriate cultural
expression here and uh let's carry on."
But he he doesn't say that none of that
happens. So maybe maybe he knows that
that he shouldn't actually be there.
Maybe he understands Mr. Baram that
there is a reason why he is hated and
why now it just turns into something
about his embarrassment and shame. Okay.
A lot there's a there's a lot unanswered
here. Yeah. Somebody had a question.
>> There is the utmost embarrassment. There
isn't very much you could do after that.
>> Right? So let's see what happens after
that. So now he's been thrown out. So
now Mama has been thrown out. He's been
thrown out. He's been embarrassed.
They've wiped the floor with him and
he's gone. So what's he going to do? So
listen to what he says. He says we're in
the the second paragraph here says the
paragraphs by the way don't appear in
the I just put it that way to make it
easier for us to follow.
Says to himself, you know, there were
rabbis sitting at this at this event.
It's always the rabbi's fault, right? So
the rabbis were sitting there,
they didn't say anything. They saw what
was going on. They saw that Mr. Howra
was throwing me out of his out of his
event. They saw I was being embarrassed.
They did nothing. Why didn't they stand
up and said, "Hey, what are you doing to
him? Leave him alone." So therefore,
he says, "Okay, that is proof. That is
proof for me that these rabbis were
happy. They were at least they weren't
bothered by what he was doing by the
fact that he embarrassed me,
which you could translate colloally as
basically I'll show them. I'm going to
go now to the king. I'm going to go to
the Roman emperor and I'm going to
to snitch on them essentially. And he
says like this.
So now goes to the quesar. He goes to
the Roman emperor and he says the
following. He says,
"The Jews are rebelling against you,
against the empire."
The emperor says, "What are you talking
about?" Says, "Who?"
He says, "I'll prove it to you." Says,
"Send him a send him a sacrifice." You
know, when we had the beta mikdash, it
wasn't just amusel who brought korban.
The non-Jews of the world could come
along. They could bring they can send
offerings to the beta mikdash as well.
So he says send them a send them in the
name of Rome
and you'll see if they are going to
offer it up if they'll sacrifice
he sends a as a as a as a sacrifice.
Now what so what happens the Roman
emperor says fine I'll send a korban
I'll send an offering you bamsa will be
my uh will be my shal you'll be you
you'll transport the offering and then
what does do he takes the offering and
the animal and he inflicts a blemish a
so there are those who say e where did
he cut the animal where did he make a a
blemish either on the lips either on its
upper lip or inside its eye in the eye
of this animal. Now, what's what's
unique about both of these places?
Very interesting. According to our laws,
we consider this to be a blemish in the
animal. But according to the Romans,
they would not have considered that to
be a blemish. That's why they didn't
know.
Okay, at this point, the question we can
ask is what was Barcamsa thinking? What
was he thinking? Okay, you I I
understand you were you were offended.
You were insulted. You were embarrassed.
You know, talk about the ultimate case
of cutting off your nose despite your
face. Right? You're going to you're
going to go and you're going to inflict
uh whatever it is going to be on the
Jewish people. You're going to be
affected as well. What's going on here?
Okay, maybe this tells us a hint. Maybe
this gives us a little bit of a hint
into who this character of Barcamsa was.
If we think through the story, it all
starts to add up. Okay, so now what
happens? By the way, this is, you know,
when we learn the story in school and we
learn the story in gun in kindergarten,
very often this is where they end the
story. But this is not the end of the
story. There's there's there's a
continuation which is very very
important. And it says like this. So
this has now happened. The party has
taken place. Okay. Bara's been thrown
out. They've mopped the floor with him.
He's now gone to take his revenge. He's
gone and he's uh slandered against the
the rabbis and the Jewish people,
against the Roman emperor. He's brought
he's got they've got the Corban. Now the
rabbis have to decide what to do. They
have this Corban. what are they going to
do with it? They know what's what's
going on. So
now there are many things that we do. We
have a concept of we don't want to uh
nowadays it's a little bit different but
in those days especially when you have a
government or you have a you know that
is that is in charge of you that has the
power of life and death and you know
there are certain things that we
wouldn't normally do but in order not to
offend we're allowed to. there are
loopholes we can. So they said maybe we
have a that has a blemish we can't bring
that up on the misb but for the sake of
maybe we're allowed to maybe we're
allowed to in order so as not to cause
antagonism towards the empire
one of the sages
we don't hear about him very often about
him in a couple of places two or three
places I think throughout the entire but
says
says they're going to say you're going
to bring this and people will say ah you
can you don't uh you can bring any
animal it has a blemish you can bring it
as a carbon so they can't do that so
they said
so they thought okay here's another idea
if nobody goes and tells the Romans that
we didn't bring the cobban then there's
no problem who's going to go and tell
them only one person bara so maybe we
should kill him okay maybe he has what's
called a dinner death okay and he's he
is endangering ing the entire Jewish
people if we if he's put to death then
he won't be able to endanger anyone
says you can't do that the same he says
because then people are going to think
that if you make a blemish on that
that's punishable by death we don't want
people to think that okay and now the
say is the most surprising statement of
the whole of the whole uh of the whole
story it saysan
says Okay, you know what the Musar
Huske, you know what the lesson is from
the story of Kamsa and Baramsa? You know
whose fault it is? Not Kamsa, not
Baramsa, not Huggabra, none of them.
It's
because of the because of the humility
of
the that is what caused us to be uh
caused the mdash to be destroyed caused
the to be burnt down and caused us to go
into exile. Okay. And then the goes on
and tells other stories and tells about
the military conquest etc. Okay, that's
the story of Kamsaramsa basically as I
said many many many questions over here
and particularly we think about the
question of you know who is responsible
where did things go wrong why did things
go so wrong how is this a message for
for for all of us okay so there's a few
different uh few different angles to
unpack here at this point again I know
we've we've spoken a little bit
throughout the story but I'm going to
open it up here to the floor at this
point just questions questions that have
been raised throughout the reading of
the story that we haven't addressed
Yeah.
>> Yes.
>> Excellent.
>> Excellent. Right. Exactly. That I think
in to my mind I'll repeat the question.
I'll repeat the question. But to my mind
that is maybe the number one the the the
striking question of the story. You know
I always feel bad. I always say whenever
I learn the story I always feel bad for
Kamza because what did Kamza do? He's
not here. He's not in the story. We
don't he wasn't there. He never heard
about if you say if we accept the
interpretation that comes to father and
son. Okay. Maybe maybe it makes sense.
>> His responsibility to be the ch between
the two people.
>> Right. Okay. So so so very much that
could be and that is one interpretation.
And there are others who say no they're
just they're strange names but it
happens sometimes people have similar
names so if he's a complete stranger so
the so the question was and again the
gimmar introduces it every word here in
the garra is chosen intentionally right
if it was up to me I would have said
it's because of and that was destroyed
right who were the enemies the enemy was
the host of the party and barama but we
don't even know the host's name so if we
forget about him and we say it's because
of Kamsa and Barcam that implies because
of what these two individuals did that's
why your was destroyed but it's not what
Kamsa did because Kamza is not in the
story he doesn't appear he's nowhere to
be found okay that's one question yeah
sorry
>> yes
>> okay okay so so we'll get
So we'll get to more offer up, but
essentially the story is as follows. We
have the party. We have comes bakama
runs out. He's very very upset. He's
very angry. He decides he's going to go
and tell concoct a story and tell the
Romans that the Jews are rebelling
against them. If the Romans think the
Jews are rebelling against them, what's
going to be the outcome? We all know
what the outcome is going to be and it's
not pretty. So at the point where he
concocts the story, he take he has the
the uh the Qurban and he's and he's put
the mum in it. Now we're still okay.
Where are things going to where are
things going to go downward very very
quickly. When Barant goes back to the
Romans and he says you sent them a
Corbine. Here's the proof. They wouldn't
bring it up. So at this point the rabbis
are discussing what to do and they say
there are two ways to avoid this. either
we can bring the corban anyway or we can
remove bargam from the equation so that
he and both of those suggestions that
are made is the one who says no you
can't do that and you can't do that so
they end up doing nothing and the result
is destruction
>> they did nothing
>> we'll
Yeah.
>> Why?
>> Yeah.
>> Right.
>> Right. Well, that well well that's
that's essentially that's essentially
Barca's claim, right? That's what he's
saying. Why don't you I'm I'm here. Why
can't you just uh let go? He doesn't he
doesn't do that. Yeah.
>> Because to bring it to the present time
used to be religious and he likes
matzah. So I bought him matzah and he
wants to make matzah bite for me. I
don't want to embarrass him. So I say,
you know, I already have supper. I'm
trying to get out of embarrassing him
and little by little he's becoming
so you never know you could embarrass
somebody you could say something to all
the neighbors in your building in which
case they
try to do something to bring this person
closer to what he
>> could be could be yeah
>> being nice to other people
>> yes yes
this week and we learned
Yes, definitely. That will certainly be
one of the lessons that we learn here.
Yeah.
>> That that's there are versions there are
those who say that yes that
is referring to it's not explicit in our
text but there is there is such an idea.
Yeah, that's possible.
Okay. So, so
there's a lot as I said there's a lot
here to unpack. Let me let me suggest
one interpretation which we find in in
in a number of the farm and then we'll
go back and we'll look at some other
some other ways of reading the story as
well. But something may be very
interesting and very very surprising and
can help us understand rais
but if I was to ask you you know what
kind of a based on what we know about
him based on the very little the gum has
told us but it's given us a bit of an
insight into the character what kind of
a person do you think that baranta is
not greatful
>> he's vengeful Oh
>> right. In other in other words,
>> right?
>> Friends with the emperor maybe, right?
In other words, the whatever way the
does not present
as let's put it let's put it that way,
right? And in fact, I mean, you look at
what goes on. First of all, the whole
from the time that he receives his
invitation, he comes to this banquet
party, whatever it is, you know, it's
all about money. He says to the person,
you know, why doesn't he go up to him?
Why doesn't he try and make amends? Why
doesn't he try and make peace? Why
doesn't he try and say, "At least, you
know, you send me an invitation." He
does none of that. Maybe it's because he
knows that actually the person has a
grievance against them and it's a
legitimate grievance. After all, he this
is the individual who's willing to throw
everything out that a little bit, you
know, my honor. I was hurt a little bit.
I'm going to go and I'm going to get no
less and have the entire Jewish people
thrown into exile. Okay, maybe he didn't
think it would go that far when he went
to to to the emperor, but surely he knew
something was coming, right? There was
going that that's why he did it. So,
he's not he's not he doesn't seem to be
somebody great, right? Maybe part of the
message over here again and I I I say
this first I don't think this is the
only message that we that we need to
learn but it's uh maybe it's a little
bit counterintuitive but maybe this is
why when we get to the end we get to
right and then the Gar says at the end
of the story he said
he didn't say it was the indecision of
that caused this he says it was the
humility what's what's humility got to
do with it here why why is that the uh
why is that the uh the essence? So have
a look at source number five. It's on on
your second page again. This is from
he suggests like this. He says
right you can ask the question really
what what what was raiser thinking? I
asked before what was banta thinking but
what was rabies thinking? Surely he
understood what the consequences of this
would be. So he says to me
says why does it say the raisaria says
maybe raisaria was the person who had a
good heart he had a good eye he judged
everybody very very favorably he
couldn't believe that bama would be such
a russia that he would go and he would
slander against the Jewish people to the
Roman emperor how could you go that far
that's that's unthinkable vermin
So maybe he thought when he says you
can't do this because people will think
that you can bring on with the you can't
do this people think somebody who puts a
a mban is going to be is going to be
subject to death it couldn't be you tell
him the story and he says no you know
there's no way that that's actually what
happened that this individual is now
going to go and he's going to tell the
Romans I don't believe that that will
Right.
He says therefore he was he was
insistent you can't kill this shal and
you can't go and you can't bring this.
What's in other words what's the worst
that's going to happen? Not what
happened. Obviously,
he says sometimes and he he goes on and
he he he brings further further support
for this. But you know, sometimes if the
person that's that we're dealing with
is in is in fact the Rash that it sounds
like he is, he's an evil person. and
he's somebody who's willing to go
because he was felt a little bit of a
slide to his own honor. He's willing to
go and he's willing to incriminate the
entire Jewish people and need to even if
he doesn't think it maybe that it's
going to go that far but he thinks you
know he knows surely something's going
to happen. So such a person maybe we
don't have to uh we we you know maybe
it's it's not possible to make shalom
with such a person. It's not. Sometimes
we have to know that I'm faced in a
situation. I'm faced an impossible
situation. There's somebody here who
really has gone over to the other side,
let's say, and there's nothing that we
can do. It's a it's it's it's a
completely different way of looking at
the story. The problem with this
interpretation, I'll tell you, I think
it's I think it's true. The problem is
that most people certainly in our
society today are very very quick to
judge and very very quick to say, "Ah,
that person he's barsa." Right? that
this is an extreme example. This is an
extreme case. How many most of the
people that we have disagreements with?
Most of the people that we have
arguments with are not to the extent you
know of bama. We should get over those
arguments. We should find a way to the
but what the is telling you at the end
was of course sometimes there are people
sometimes there are extreme examples and
extreme situations where you cannot get
over it. But comes he's out of the
picture. Okay. I think part of our
problem and part of the lesson is we
think everybody's like that. We think
everybody's out of the picture. There's
a famous nativity
of who has an introduction to
and he writes there this was exactly the
problem during he says during beni
everybody they thought he says they
would sikim they were they were
righteous people they were they were
pious people they did all the mitzvot
they learned to they did everything was
wonderful you know what the problem was
the says you know he says you know what
means it means that you see the person
who's wears a different color kipati or
wears a different kind of hat to you or
wears different things are a little bit
different. You say he's an Apicorus and
he's a stuki and he's barsa and he's out
of the picture. He doesn't say barama
but I'm I'm just uh comparing this story
to to what he says over there. He says
anybody who's a little bit different
different than them. They said he is out
of the camp. They said he's not uh he's
not somebody we have to try and make
shalom with. We we're too the problem is
the people that we should try and
resolve with we don't and the people
that we shouldn't we do. Right? That's
that that's the problem. So that's
number one. That's something that we
have to that we have to identify and
that's something that we have to get
better at. Okay. But that that's in
terms of maybe raised
the question. So what did Kamsa do
wrong? Kam is not here. Kam is not part
of the story. And what the Marel says he
says something beautiful. He says what
the Quran is trying to teach you. And
when it says that we have
do you know what it means that your was
destroyed because oft doesn't mean
because there was an anecdote because
there was such an event in such a hall
on such a date at such a time and this
thing happened that's just an example
but you know when you have a reality of
kamarama
and reality of kamaka means that there
is such division that there is such
strife that everybody that the society
is built in such a way that everybody
has their camp and everybody has their
allies and has their enemies, right? And
I have my kamsas in my life and I have
the bumps in my life. You can imagine
outside this party people were probably
standing there holding up signs that
said Rakama or Rakama, right? The names
are almost identical. Why? Because
whether there is father and son or
whether they don't know each other, it
doesn't The point is there's only two
letters here that differentiate between
these two individuals where at the end
of the day we're so similar. At the end
of the day, there's not always that much
which is different between us. But you
know what? You're my ally and you're my
enemy. Why?
I don't like you. I You're you're out of
the picture. When And that was the
reality. Everything was so divided.
Everybody had their faction and
everybody had their camp and everybody,
you know, we see this if it sounds
familiar. You know, we see this in
sports. We see this in politics. You
know, in Israel, the two are the same
thing. Sports, politics is the national
sport. It's the only one we're good at.
And even that one we're not so good at.
But but but but that's when it's about
issues and when it's about values and
when it's about I can have a
disagreement with somebody but we can
talk and we can be civil. That's okay.
But anytime there like the native says
somebody who doesn't think exactly the
same thing that I think they're my
enemy.
Well then from there the spiral
downwards is very very quick and is very
very sharp. And that's what the Quran
That's what the moral says says
when your society is such that everybody
has their allies and everybody has their
enemies and anybody who's not exactly
the same is my enemy and is and again
notwithstanding what I said sometimes
there is such an individual sometimes
there can be extreme cases but those are
extreme and those are few and far
between they're not everywhere and
everything that is the cause it's not
that this individual name comes he may
have existed he may not have existed the
might be telling us a story but but the
reality of come is something that caused
that caused destruction.
Maybe the key to this whole story is uh
appears in the second paragraph appears
in a in a detail which sounds very
technical but I think we're hinting at
us something very very deep and the
moral explains this right there's two
phrases which I've put in bold for you
this m the blemish that puts in the
animal where does he put the blemish
either in the lips or in the eyes and
then the says and it says something else
it says this is something which is a
blemish for us but it's not a blemish
for them. So, by the way, I think
there's a very deep message there as
well. You know, we're used to this
double standard. You know, the world
looks at us. The world judges Israel in
one way, judges the rest of the world
another way. Okay? The way they judge us
is unfair and it's based on lies and
deception and propaganda and hatred.
Granted, but there should be a double
standard. Meaning there are we that
which is required of us that which is
sometimes is things that right is very
we have a phrase in the Quran says
the greater the more righteous a person
is the harsher the judgment is there
there is a certain standard sometimes we
are required we are we have a job to do
and we're required to uphold a higher
standard to ourselves but why the lips
and why the eyes because that is the
message so much of the story so much of
the strife and the conflict between us
comes from these these two from these
two faculties. The lips,
what do you say? What do you speak
about? How do you talk? How do you talk
about other people? The eyes, how do you
and there's two ways that you can talk
about the eyes. You can talk about how
we see each other, what we look for. Do
we look at the positive or do we always
look to see the negative or sometimes as
we see in the story as well, sometimes
we close our eyes when there are things
that we should open our eyes, we should
look at, we should take a stand, and we
should stand up and we should speak out
for injustice, which maybe we don't. So
those two things that that's the message
you know is a beautiful uh idea that
we're now in Benim these three weeks
what's known we have three special
what's called the puranut so the three
special haarot each have a name each
have a word that begins last week we
read beginning with dra means words the
next one the second starts with shimu
which means to hear and the third one is
kazon is a vision that is the key says
That is the key. That is the road map
for the time of year that we're in and
the way of getting out of it. It's based
on how we speak.
How how do we listen? So much in our
society would be so different if we
could correct this. And finally, how do
we see what do we see? How do we see? Do
we have a vision of who we are and where
we are going and what we are what we are
we are trying to do. Have a look here on
on the page. Let me just say one one
other thing about this about this idea
of kamsan baramsa the society. You know
we see
which we always read before
and uh one of the reasons there's a near
the beginning that says
which appears of course
appears as well but here is giving his
parting message and he's giving rebuke
to the people over the mistakes that
they've made and he says
says how can I how could I stand by
myself I couldn't bear you or your
bother or your burden, right? Or your
conflicts. And he talks, he's repeating,
he's giving them rebuke over the time
when
comes to Rabenu. He says, "You can't do
this by yourself. You're going to stand
all day. You're going to judge the
people. You need help. You need to
delegate people. You need to delegate a
system under you." And he does.
So, so, so that's what he said. And here
says to the people he says
he says you all said that's a good idea
also said it's a good idea the god said
it's a good idea the fact is that it was
it was implemented so why is that part
of the rebuke so there are different
answers but if you look at the next so
he says
right so we have these people who are
appointed Ed over a thousand people
appointed over 100 people over 50 people
over 10 people says you understand here
what the rebuke is that you need a
system of judges why do you need judges
because people are coming they have
conflicts they have arguments they're
having fights with one another
so you need a person you need a judge
for every 10 people and every 10 people
you're having conflicts what's going on
that's called that's called the
situation of kamsa kama so all these
fights all this mak over what I mean
they were in the desert what were they
fighting about okay but that that's one
of the things that that's the idea so so
maybe to wrap up and to end off we see
many many things the truth is there's a
lot more and and there's much more that
we could talk about over the story but
uh our time is limited but these are
some of the things that we see here we
see a picture of kamsa
we see a picture of a society that is
divided for the sake of division of
conflict for the sake of conflict we see
where people are fighting against each
other not over ideas not over values but
against individuals and I view people
and I view the other as somebody
different as somebody who is not part of
my society not part of my world that is
something very very dangerous how do we
look at each other and how do we look at
the things that we see around us do we
notice do we take do we do we take care
we see something something that doesn't
quite look right something that's going
on do we stand up do we speak about it
do we have something to say do we look
at the negative or do we are we able to
look at the positive in one another are
we able able to how do we speak about
one another? Okay, do we have that false
humility? And of course, at the end of
the day, you're in a situation in an
extreme situation. Granted, but
sometimes in extreme situation, that's
where you have to step up. That's where
we have to step forward. Particularly
for leaders, do we just let things go on
as they are and do nothing that is
something which can have disastrous
consequences as well. I want to just end
off with with one other thing maybe for
this for the for this time of year.
maybe something something for us to
think about as we go away over the
summer break which is this you know at
the end of the day all that we're
talking about is
the the the essence of at the end of the
day the morning for the mikdash of
morning for is the desire to want to see
it rebuilt and the question is how
central is that in our lives do we care
how much do we care how much do we
notice how much do we think about it how
much do we is this number one on our
priority list is this important in our
values
And there's a story that I've heard from
a number of soldiers who've come back
from Gaza and have said, you know, they
went inside, they were fighting in Aza
and one thing which they noticed, many
things to notice there, but one thing
they noticed, they said, every single
house every single house that we went
into had a they said every single house
that we went into in Gaza had a picture
had a picture of what they call alaka,
what they call what we call harabay of
the temple mount. of Jerusalem, right?
What did they call what did they call
the war? They called it to a they called
it Jerusalem. They named it after
Jerusalem. They attacked us in they
attacked us in the attacked us in the
south, but the war was called the war
over Jerusalem. They didn't forget. They
didn't forget what the central what the
central thing is ultimately. What's the
vision? And the question is, do we
remember? Do we know that? Are we able
to fight back? Are we able to have that
central place for Jerusalem in our lives
for the rebuilding for all the things
that that that that involves andm if we
can each one of us can take to heart one
it's impossible to change everything at
once but if each one of us can take to
heart one thing one lesson that we learn
one thing that one area where I am going
to improve one flaw that I can correct
for the sake of your
we will merit very very soon and
speedily in our days that it should be
rebuilt.