Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Parting Salvos Rabbi Shmuel Goldin
50 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
doing is it's it's unfortunate, but the
last part in the Torah we rarely really
pay much attention to in terms of study
because they happen around the and we're
busy worrying about the and learning
about the and talking about the and it's
unfortunate because those last parot are
really very dramatic and very important
and I thought what we would do is we're
going to take a look I call it parting
salvo. So, we're going to take a look at
a number of different
specific portions of specific pariote at
the end of the Torah just to get an idea
of some of the wealth that's there and
some of the ideas that are there.
Certainly not comprehensive in any way,
but pretty much sort of as an example.
Let's start with the first and without
question, the first is unfortunately
very appropriate for our times. Take a
look at the first section on page one,
please.
It should be familiar to you because we
read it before Purim.
All right. Remember what did to you?
We'll talk about that phrase in a
moment. They came on you in the way
and they picked off, if you will, all of
those that were straggling behind you.
And most people explained that last
phrase to be referring to.
And then finally,
when God finally gives you the
opportunity to dwell peacefully in your
land,
erase the memory of a mole from other
under the heavens. So let's take a look
at the first question I asked. What
defines in this in this section? What is
it that defines am? Let's let's realize
that we talk about Amalik all the time,
but what are the characteristics of an
enemy that make that enemy Amik
anything in the text?
>> What?
>> Okay. So, what's
>> great? Correct. Ka comes from the word
mikra. There's a medrashic explanation
that everybody lies likes and it's
related to the word k and cold and what
it says is that that this medish
suggests that when we came out of mit we
were burning hot nobody was willing to
touch us because we were so powerful in
their eyes and then amal comes as the
first attack and that cools everything
down and creates all the problems. So
that's not the explanation we're going
to focus on. We're focusing on what you
suggested which is the word mikre. The
word mikre comes from the word means
happen stance.
They happen to you on the way. It just
so happened that this wasn't a planned
attack. And more importantly there was
no reason for this attack. This was
totally gratuitous. You were not
traveling in their land. You were not
endangering them. you were not affecting
them. You were just leaving Egypt and
moving along. And they attacked you for
no reason.
And this the last point is
who do they attack? They attack the
weak. So you have certain
characteristics that make someone.
They are individuals who will hate you
for no reason. Sound familiar?
All right. And and they are people they
will pick on the they will try to get to
the weakest among you and pick them off.
All right. So that's that's Amoleik.
Now let's take a look
for a moment at the Rambam. All right.
We're going to take a look at the
Rambam. And we're not for the first
Rambom we're going to learn is not about
Amalik. actually about the seven nations
that are in the land.
Mitzvah,
it is a positive commandment.
It is your responsibility. It's a
positive commandment to destroy the
seven nations. Those are the seven
nations in Kanan because the Torah says
destroy them utterly.
If you
happen to find one of them and you don't
fulfill this mitzvah, you have
transgressed the positive commandment.
And then the last three words.
Anybody want to tell me what that means?
They are no longer identifiable.
you can no longer identify one of
someone from the seven nations. All
right, let's understand that. In other
words, what we're saying is that for
some reason something happened
historically that caused there to be a
break in the identification of these
nations and they are no longer
identifiable by their source. Well,
we're going to skip for a moment and
come back. Take a look at the bottom of
the first page and the top of the in the
English on the top of the second. It's a
fascinating little story found in the
Mishna. And this story has particular
importance as we see in the Ramb. Boayom
boy Yehuda G AI
a convert
who was an Ammonite by stated identity.
He said, "I'm an Ammonite." People do
things like that, I guess. I my my
brother-in-law who is a um in charge of
Kashus in the five towns says he had a
fellow who worked for him who he had to
fire who called himself auduki.
He was part of the sudukim which is a
whole another group but the ammonites.
All right
medari
can I enter the community? Can I be part
of the Jewish world? It's not just
enter. I mean, can I be part of the
Jewish world is the Ra would say,
you're not allowed to.
No, you can come on in.
Omar,
what can I do?
turns to and says, "What are you what
are you talking about?" It says in the
Torah, "Lo yo,
hashem adori,
you know, it says in the Torah, up until
the 10th generation, an ammonite cannot
enter the community. What are you what
are you letting him in for?"
says, "Rebos."
Are you telling me that
Moabites are identifiable?
Ashbel.
Now, what does that mean? San Heriff,
the king who the who um ruled over the
attack on the 10 tribes and exiled the
10 tribes, the Assyrian king. Basically,
he had a an unu not unusual but a very
wise way of dealing with those that he
conquered. What he would do is he would
uproot
people from their homelands or from
their homes, put them in another
community, take the community there and
put them back there. And he did that.
Why? Why did he do that? Because he was
robbing them of their strength. In other
words, if I'm home and I'm in my land, I
can rebel. But if you take me and you
disperse me, you put me in different
communities, you So San came and that's
the turning point says Ramon Rabiohua.
That's the turning point. The turning
point is Sanv
exile of the 10 tribes and at the same
time buildumos.
So says Raboshua based on that this
Ammonite can come in. This ammonite
doesn't know what he is. He's claiming
to be an ammonite, but he can't identify
himself as such. And this brings back a,
and just as an aside, a a powerful
memory that I have. I may have mentioned
this before. One time and during one of
the um missions that I had with members
of my show to various places, we we
always went to Israel, but we sometimes
tacked somewhere else on. went to Rome
this time and we were standing by the
arch of Titus and the non-Jewish guide
was talking and he was saying you should
know what the arch of Titus is. It
represents the conquest of the Judeans.
Basically the the idea was that the
Romans felt that not only had they
conquered them but they had destroyed
them. They would no longer exist. There
was a triumphant parade underneath the
arch. And I stopped. I after he finished
I said I I just like to add one thing
and I said this underscores the heroism
the quiet heroism of one particular
figure in Jewish history that we don't
think about enough and that's Rabbi
Yohanon Benzakai because Rabi Yohan Ben
Zankai orchestrates the transformation
of the Jewish people from a temple-based
society
to a rabbitic based society. In other
words, he knows that the if the temple
is destroyed that you can't that's not
going to be the glue. Even its memory
won't be the glue to hold you together.
You have to have something else. And and
therefore he started he put into place
various different things but he kept the
oral law going from before and onward
and because of that we were able to
retain our identity. This guy turned and
he said, "I want you to know, he says, I
am always amazed
when I stand with a Jewish group here."
He said, "You know, I live in Italy. I'm
not a Roman,
right? There are no Romans. I'm Italian.
It's amazing to me that you as a people
can take yourselves back all the way to
those times and before and still claim
and and with reality and with proof show
that you are part of that people. He
says I'm amazed. It's it's amazing to me
and you know sometimes you have to hear
it from others. It we of we don't take
it we don't spend time on it enough. It
is miraculous.
miraculous the work of Hashem and also
the work of Ben Israel that we have been
able to survive across the generations
against everything that we faced and
still we're here and still we thrive.
Mark Twain said it, others have said it,
we should say it. I'm teaching a two
courses at MMY this year and and one
course is on the birth of the Jewish
nation. The way I started was with that
story. I said you have to understand
that it is miraculous and you went when
I had my sh
had a spartic minion is a spartic area
as well as an Ashkanazic. It was an
Ashkanazic sh but we built a beautiful
area for the spartum in the community
and that's grown tremendously. Every
once in a while some of my Ashkanazic
congregants would go into to Davin with
well you know Davin to because that's
Yiddish. They don't say English but go
into to pray with they don't say English
either [laughter] to be met pal with the
with the spart they would come out they
say to me rabbi
it's so different it you know it's
really it's like different world I said
you don't get it
you don't get it the miracle is not that
it's different the miracle is how much
the same it is it's the same amid
It's the same schma. It's the same
structure of the tilo. Sure, a lot of
things are different because we pick
things up as we go. But the fact is that
we when when we we're living in unusual
times. The walls have come down. Spartan
and Ashkanazim had no contact with each
other for centuries. The fact that we
could re recognize each other as Jews,
it's amazing. So I said to them, you got
to understand that's the miracle. The
miracle is not how different it is, but
how much alike we are. Yes.
>> So basically everybody is allowed to
convert these days. There's no such
thing as loit.
>> That is correct.
>> That is correct. That is correct.
There's no ammonites. There are no
Egyptians. There are no any of those any
of those peoples have been dispersed and
have disappeared. Now go back up. Yes.
I'm sorry.
>> What? Well, we're going to get to that.
>> Okay.
>> All right. Now, take a look at the the
second Rambam back on page one. [snorts]
All right. The second Rambam is
following is the right after the one
before
and it says
it is a positive commandment to destroy
the memory of
you always have to remember the bad
things he Remember
what did to you.
You have to remember in your heart and
speak it out and then remember in your
heart.
You cannot forget his hatred and his
enmity.
The Rambam leaves something out. What
does he leave out?
>> He doesn't say that when he talks about
the seven tribes, the seven amim, what
does he say? He says they're not around
anymore. He does not say that about
Amalik,
which leads Ravik and others to suggest,
and this the Rav is very clear on this,
that there are two kinds of amolic.
There's a biological amalake
and there is a philosophical amalik.
And while a biological I can no longer
identify someone as a biological amalic.
I can't do that. Right? I can certainly
identify people who are philosophically
amalic and that's what we are facing in
our world. Right? Not just not just from
our neighbors here but around the world.
The last thing I heard now is that
Norway is thinking of making it a
threeyear jail penalty if you do
commerce with from the West Bank.
Three years
>> you I say who done Shamron. They say the
West Bank, right? So, but the point
being that that you know what's going
on? I mean it it it's amazing how the
world just shifted shifted
and that's the next thing I want to talk
about. Let's take a look again at this
mitzvah.
This mitzvah if you read it seems
counterproductive,
right? Why? Remember, remember so that
you erase the memory. So if you erase
the me I'm not going to remember. Why?
what's what's it telling me to do and
why?
So the truth is that it's telling
telling us something very powerful that
we forgot perhaps and the world wants us
to forget and that is that there is a
difference between
and
to forget something
means it's still there.
It's still there. You you may not see it
now. You may not recognize it now, but
you but that's still around
when you erase something sh.
And that's what we're dealing with here.
We're turning to the world and and that
a world that told us after the shawah
over and over and over again, what do
you keep bringing up the Holocaust for?
It's passed. It's gone. There you now
people don't hate you like that. Guess
what?
>> Guess what? You know, there was a
bubble. There was a bubble at after the
Shawah where it was unfashionable to be
anti-Semitic.
You couldn't do it
>> outwardly.
>> What?
>> Outwardly,
>> right? It was unfashionable to to
present yourself as anti-semitic.
>> We lived in that bubble for a pretty
long time.
>> And now the bubble's burst. And what do
we see? What was there the whole time?
This is not new. What was this couldn't
be new? This is what was there the whole
time. And it's amazing to see again and
again how we become the the the focal
point of the hatred of the world. It's
crazy. So therefore this really is a
very very appropriate section for us to
think about and not pass over and that
is difference between
and between forgetting and erasing and
we turn to the world and to ourselves
and say we've got to erase it once and
for all. Okay. Next turn to the next
page.
All right. So that as I told you if you
came in a little late you you don't know
what we're doing. where I said that it's
a shame that we don't spend time with
the last uh parote in the Torah because
we're so busy with Yantiff. So I'm
taking certain sections from those
pariote just to learn them and they're
disparit par they're not connected to
each other necessarily but they are each
important and telling us something
important that I'd like us to learn. All
right so the next section is the
beginning of parasavo.
The last section we learned was in
Paris.
And in Pariso,
the the Torah opens with a section that
should be familiar to all of us.
When you come to the land,
when you come to the land that God gives
to you,
you shall take the first fruits of your
land
that God is giving to you. Bring it to
you.
You should come to Cohen who is in that
day vom
and you should say the following. And
now this is what we are reading is known
in vernacular vidiurim.
It's the formula that you recite when
you bring the bikurim.
What do you say?
I'm saying to god your god.
All right. I I said this is the first
line. I said, "I have come to the land
that God promised to us." Then I go on
after the cohen takes the the fruit from
me and puts it by the misbehines
up.
You'll say before God now
sound familiar, right?
The entire section is contained in the
Hagod.
So let's ask ourselves a couple of
questions about that.
If you were well, let's start with this.
Which holiday is the bikurim associated
with?
>> Right? So why am I saying it on Pes?
Even more so
that section if you understand the
Hagada properly that section is a
section of limud Torah. What do we do?
We take this paragraph
we quote it and we dissect it and we
give all of the commentaries on give
commentaries on. So we're learning
together in the middle of the seder.
We'll talk about why that's so
important. But if I were to pick if you
if you were to pick a paragraph from the
Torah that you thought we should learn
at the seder, what would you pick?
What would you pick?
>> Something from where
>> you see, right? I thought something from
one pes something which were reliving
something. Why am I taking a section of
the text that is found in Dvarim which
speaks about what? Which speaks about
the a farmer speaking now about
something that happened centuries before
because that's when this is going to be
said. This is going to be said once you
conquer the land.
So why not take it's what we call the
difference between a primary source and
a secondary source. Why not take the
primary source? Why not take that part
of the Torah that talks about the story
and not take this part? So, there are a
variety of answers, but the one that hit
me is the following. Take a look at the
language of the farmer.
All right, he starts off.
My father was a wandering Aramian.
He went down to Egypt and he lived there
and dwelt there in small numbers
and he became a great nation.
Who knew what just changed?
What just happened? us. All of a sudden,
he's not talking about someone else.
All of a sudden, this farmer who is
talking centuries after the story occurs
turns and says at at the point what at
the point in his discussion where we
become a nation where nationhood is
born. He says
all of a sudden he is what is he doing?
He's personalizing history.
He's taking history that happened to
someone else and he's saying it didn't
happen to someone else. It happened to
me. And that I think may be why this is
the section we're told to learn at the
seder because of all what is what is the
primary goal of the seder. Primary goal
of the seder is to inject us into the
flow of of Jewish history. You ever
think for a moment about how the seder
is structured? You have ritual before
the meal and then ritual after. Why
don't we structure it like all the
ritual and get to the meal or the meal
and get to the ritual? We probably
wouldn't stay for the ritual, but the
fact is why why are we injecting the the
me the meal right into the middle? And
by the way, it's not only in the middle
of the ritual,
>> it's in the middle of halal. It divides
halal into two.
So if you look carefully what you find
is that everything before the meal is
happening in the past.
Everything after the meal is speaking
about the future. The turning point is
which would be right and and now we're
moving into the future. And what's the
meal?
The meal is the present. The meal is me.
The meal is us. We are the meal, right?
And and we are sitting at a meal that is
encompassed by Jewish history and it's
injecting us right into the into the
flow. And that's why I think this
section is chosen. And I'll tell you
something else. I think that's why we
learn at the seder because when you
learn, if you learn Gomorrah and other
oral law properly.
So again, I hear you have to hear it
from others. I heard it from a balchuva
who started learning amara for the first
time and he came to me he said you know
he said it's amazing
time falls away
I'm sitting at a table and Rabi Akiba
says something and then Rabbiel says
something and then Rashi who lives
centuries later says well you know I I
maybe we can correlate this way and then
toos Rashi's grandchildren start yelling
at their grandfather And they start
saying, "No, we this is what we say."
And then and I'm sitting at this table
and they're all talking and the Rambam
and the Ed everybody's coming here.
Everybody's in town. Everybody's in town
and the time just falls away. I am part
of an eternal flow. So learning is
perhaps the single best way
to arrive at this personalization of
history to recognize that we are part of
a flow of a conversation a dialogue that
began centuries before we were born and
will continue until the end of days. And
that that may be what this section is
meant to portray and why we read it at
the center. Yes.
>> Right.
>> What they did to us?
It's like what happened to the Jews in
Europe was successful
>> of course and then came
>> right what's happening
>> what's happening to us not the same
but but you don't think that part of
what is fueling the hatred today is not
the success of the Jewish people
>> sure it is sure it is I think I told you
the the famous joke about two Jews that
are two old Jews are sitting on the
subway in New York and one of them is
reading a newspaper and it's one of
these newspapers that's anti-semitic to
a tea it's just horrible and his friend
turns to him and says uncle why are you
reading that rag he says you don't
understand if I read the other papers I
get depressed I read this I own the
banks I have all the money I do all the
things right it it's it I feel good when
I read this right so The point being
that yeah a lot of that yes last then
we'll
>> talking about personalization of history
it's interesting in the text what we
have to say
why is it referred to
>> well in the first yeah right so it the
first Eloh
is the one that he says right and he's
saying to the coain I've come and and
he's introducing himself and he's saying
I'm it's your god it's not just my god
it's your god too. When he says,
right? Then he says the name is Eloh
that's talking about him. He's putting
it down before the of his god. So the
second elo is not the co. The second elo
is
>> what? Why isn't
>> because that doesn't fit the name is
hashem. It says the t the coin should
take it m
and place it by the m
ofash.
So that's what so that's right. Okay.
But you're you're right about the next
sentence.
Again, you're not that's not the guy
speaking. That's the Torah telling him,
right? So, the only time that he really
uses the phrase this the word Eloh
to speak of God is when he first comes
and introduces himself to the
>> Cohen.
>> That's right. Correct. Correct. Okay.
Next, turn the page, please. All right.
Now, one one of the things I want us to
remember as we're going through the next
sections is that we we're on the last
day of Mosha's life in parim
we are we are we've reached the last day
of Mosha's life and safer dvarim to
really understand safer dvarim is in its
totality Moshe's farewell addresses to
bay Israel. It's it's tremendously
dramatic to read to read drive
appropriately. You have to have in mind
that Moshe is saying goodbye that this
is he telling you what he wants you to
remember. He he's make and I've always
felt by the way that that
you see Dvarm is different because
there's much more of Moshe in the text.
It doesn't say
Moshe talks I did this. We did this. He
talks in the first person. It's not like
the rest of the text. And I've always
felt that Hashem says, "I want there to
be to learn a certain huge lesson and
we've said this before I know and that
is that we are the product not only of
books and letters. We the product of
people and their actions across the
generations." He wanted us to get a
glimpse of Moshe the person and
recognize that from that moment on we
will also be the product of people who
travel across the world and travel
across time.
This is this is this is so it's
tremendously dramatic.
Now
he stands and he says,
"You are each standing. You are all
standing. All of you
uh page four, I'm sorry. Page four.
You're standing before God, the Lord
your God,
right?
Everybody from the from the water drawer
to to the uer of of wood to theim to the
everyone you're all standing here and
and I'm talking to each of you equally
to cause you to pass through a covenant.
Remember the word bris in the Torah is
very very specific. It's a very powerful
word. You can have agreements. You can
be
and that's a sort of an agreement. You
can have a bris. A bris means we're
intertwin. You're responsible for this.
This is this stance. This is so it's a
there's a legal connotation to a bris.
And what is he saying?
Right, etc. He's
you should he's taking telling you today
that you have to follow his way etc etc
to enter in the covenant
not just with with you but
what is he saying he's saying who who is
this verse with all Jews across time
right the only problem is well before we
get to that problem. The rabbis are, you
know, they're amazing when you think of
it. They they they they
debate
the efficacy of this bris on a legal
they they debate the efficacy of the
bris legally,
right? Because they say, are you legally
allowed to commit someone who is not
there at the time to a specific action?
So they argue about that. So comes under
scrutiny here. But putting that aside,
there is another problem. And the other
problem Moshe actually mentions but not
as a problem. Look at the bottom. The
last statement at the bottom.
This is the britz that God told Moshe to
to convey con to to convey and to to
create in Eric Movoras
in addition to
the covenant that God created convened
at Kore. And if you go back, if you go
back to Matan Torah, you find there's a
moment there where
the word bris comes into play and Hashem
says, "I'm making a bris with you. I'm
making a covenant with you." And and
it's starting here at Hari. So
the rabbis ask, "What do you need to
breed for?" Right? If you're having a
second bris, does that mean that the
first one didn't take? So that happens
with Aviamelik and Abraham, right? Avi
Melik makes a bris with Abraham. When
Yitz when he when Yeitzka comes into the
scene, he comes again and he says, "I
want to make a bris." And what you see
from that is that the first bris didn't
work. You know, if I have to make a a
treaty with you on the same thing about
a treaty I made before, then I as we
often experience. So why are there to be
retold?
And Rabves says the following. He says
there are two covenants that we are all
responsible for
and they are different in nature.
[cough]
There is what he calls the Britote
the covenant of the forefathers
and there is the Brit I'll call it
Britany the individual covenant with
each of us.
The Britta vote he says
is the covenant that is made between God
and Knesset Israel as a body
everybody. In other words, with as a as
a group,
the Brit here is a covenant he makes
with each and everyone.
And both of them are essential. And in
fact, the Rav and this is appropriate.
See, we're talking about Doma. Now, the
Rav says that there are two paths to
Chuva that every Jew must go through on
Yom Kipur.
One path is the individual path I have
to go through. I have to look at what I
did. Look at what I change. The other
path is a is connecting myself to
Knesset Israel. The other path is I have
to be part of the Jewish collective.
And he says if you look carefully at
what happens in the Torah the Hamish,
right, the the goat that sent them,
which is a whole another discussion,
right? But what what happens before the
goat is sent to Aazel?
The Cohen
states a confession for all Israel on
the goat. In other words, and what what
is he doing says thereof? That
represents the communal kapora. That
represents and the only thing what's
necessary for you to receive that
communal kapor is you have to say I'm
part. I'm one. I'm with you.
But then there is the individual road
that you have to take as well.
And that's why we'll find in the
yomipper liturgy for example that is so
there's a distinction between us and
everybody meaning two different
elements. each of us individually
and each of us as a part of the
collective whole and and why I think
this is so important today
is because that's also part of the
struggle that we're facing.
How many people and I'm not getting I'm
not going to get involved in politics
will say I'm doing my thing. I'm doing
it well and I don't be have to be part
of the collective.
I don't have to and I'm not just talking
about the I'm talking about others as
well. I don't have to be part of you
know I you if you're not part of the
collective the rough says then you then
one path towards chuva one essential
path is simply not taken simply not
taken and therefore we will go through
both of those and I think when we go
through it on yum kicker in addition to
going through our own personal lives and
actions we should think real hard about
what we're doing for the collective,
volunteering,
uh other things, what what can we do,
each of us do? And and the Ram says
others say that if someone performs
every single mitzvah,
but doesn't mourn the temple's
destruction
will not be able to see its rebuilding.
In other words, the idea being you have
to be part of the collective as well as
an individual sadic. So those two those
two breto speak to two different
elements and to two different pathways.
All right, we're almost we're almost
finished. Let me just go quickly to the
next section and now I'll take any
comments. All right, the next session is
is is really um very quickly very sort
of strange. Next section is rashi and
not not the text. It's the last puk in
the Torah.
The last puk in the Torah says at the
top of the page
no there never rose a
um
a leader etc.
to all the signs etc etc that God did
so
all of these great things that Hashem
did all right and Moses
played a role in bringing down right an
Israel
and what happens is the the rabbis
dissect each aspect here what did the
oos that it's talking about what are the
mo it's talking about what's the yada
what are why this rep and they they
point to specific points in Mosha's
career that the line is referring to and
then you come to the last one
and they say the following that refers
to the fact that he broke the tablets
the last words in the Torah.
So you look at that and you say that's
what I'm supposed to remember about
Moshe just and by the way that's a very
controversial act there there there are
those who say he did it on purpose there
are those who said he was forced to do
it but one way or the other it's not so
simple and who has to come to him later
according to the say
so I'm going to just introduce a thought
because we have to stop turn to the next
page for a second
one
motion.
>> Oh,
>> typo. Typo. Okay. Sorry about that. How
totally remember Aam. No, should say how
we were told to mention Moshe. Sorry
about that. All right. All right. If you
take a look at the bottom of the next to
last page and the last page, you see you
see Moshe recalling what happened at
Hari. And when he recalls what happened
at Arseni, he mentioned something that
was not mentioned originally. And that
is that he created God told him to make
an ark of wood and he put was told to
put the tablets into the ark of wood and
he take a look it says it four times in
the span of five sukim and again this is
something that is not mentioned when it
occurs. This is only mentioned in
Mosha's recollections.
So I'm going to throw it out to you.
I'll let you think about it over yontiff
and and see if you can come up with an
answer for me. Why is that so important?
Why and and can that help us understand
why Mosha's breaking of the luote was
correct and important as well and
something to be remembered. All right.
So that's your that's your homework. Uh
we'll see you all.
I said mistake, mistake, mistake. I
really
>> who is the rough son