Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Parshat Mishpatim: Understanding Oral Law and Rabbinic Authority by Rabbi Yossi Goldin
17 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures #halacha #parsha #parshathashavua #mishpatim Delivered at the OU Israel Center, 27 Shevat 5784 / February 6, 2024
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
warm and that you're all doing well
today we're going to be a little bit
ambitious I decided to uh to take to
take it I want to say take a chance but
to try to be ambitious we're going to
cover a topic that
is a little bit complicated I would say
it's somewhat I wouldn't say it's
um I wouldn't say it's not controversial
it is just a fundamental topic um in
Judaism that is little that has a lot
there's a lot a lot been written on
there's a lot of debate regarding how to
understand it but at the same time I
think it's it's fundamental to our own
aod and that is the issue of allu Law
and rabic Authority okay one of the
major questions that many people
struggle with is understanding the
history of the oral law how the oral law
developed the nature of of rinic
authority right many people there are
many people who are comfortable with
understanding the concept of of there
being a God and of the Torah being
Divine but the development of oral law
and rabic Authority can be a little bit
challenging so we're going to we're
going to try to the reason why I wanted
to do this this week is obviously we're
now dealing with the weeks
of the last week was when the Torah was
given this week we have par MIM where
the Torah pivots from the from the from
the huge event of M of mad to the
nitty-gritty details of the of the
in um and already if you look at source
number one on your sheets the
T Rashi right away already references
one of the major questions and that is
well what exactly was given to Moshe at
Hari how much was given to Moshe Hari
what is the what is the written law what
is the oral law Rashi in Source number
one the very beginning of this week's
para the the Torah
begins says rash in Source number
one says Rashi anytime the Torah
introduces a section with the word a
these These are the words these are that
means that the Torah if it's just a the
Torah is basically starting something
new and not necessarily connecting to
the previous story if you have the word
v and these says Rashi the Torah is very
deliberately trying to connect the
ensuing story with the story that had
just that was just that was just prior
and says Rashi what's the connection
between MIM and the the par right before
just like everything
in was given at says Rashi so too all
the Nitty Gritty details of par MIM
about being in EV and about my Ox gring
your ox and all the details all the mitv
in were also given in so already we see
Rashi is trying is calling the midash
why would the midash think this is
necessary because obviously we all know
The Ten Commandments many of us know
that there were certain things that were
given at ARC there's the written Torah
but the question becomes well when was
any of it given and what is the
relationship between between the written
Torah and between the oral law and as
well the question becomes is how exactly
does Rabin Authority develop over time
it's a huge topic and as I said it's
it's a bit of an ambitious topic we're
not going to cover everything there is a
lot of debate and a lot written on this
subject what we're going to hopefully do
today is share with you one perspective
that that I think you know as as we say
in Israel oer it does a little bit of
seder helps kind of give us a little bit
of basic understanding to how things to
how things worked and and before we
begin I want to actually start with a uh
with a story this has not happened to me
this actually happened to my father my
father was a before he was the rabbi in
Englewood he was the rabbi in pic
Maryland which is actually where I was
born I was born in pic Maryland I was
one one one year old when we when we
moved from from Maryland my father
explained that one of the things that he
was successful at doing inic was was was
was the creation of an A and he and and
any any of us who have ever been
involved or familiar with an AR an AR
basically involves the idea that in
order for us to be able to carry on
Shabbat in AR it's less of an issue
because we have the raban that generally
deals with these kinds of things but in
order to be able to carry on Shabbat you
need to establish different um wires and
walls to create one unit to create
what's called basically One Big R which
enables us to now be able to carry from
one place to the next and this involves
a lot of tedious work setting up wires
and poles it's a very very very
complicated complex and um and has a lot
of minute details to it and very often
setting it every Friday it needs to get
checked but setting it up again is very
very complicated my father and one of
his congregants would go had to go one
time had to go fix the AR of and they
had to they had to figure out in order
again without getting into all of the
the nitt details but they had to
basically line up a pole with a wire
that was on top in order to create
what's called a p which is you know the
image of of an opening of sunlight and
and you have to make sure that it's
exact and my father and and and this
congregate were spending a really long
time trying to line this this this poll
up with the line and it was just it took
a long time and and my father eventually
they got it and then the congregant
turns to my father and says Rabbi I
didn't want to bother you in when you
were in the middle but I but I really
have a question for you said does God
care does God really care whether or not
this pole is lined up exactly on this
string in order to we're supposed to
create so I'm going to I'm not going to
give you the answer yet I'm not going to
give you what my father responded but I
want you to think about that question
because I think it really really sets
the tone for what what we're going to be
talking about today which is how do we
understand so much of what we understand
today to be our day-to-day Judaism how
where does it come from what kind of
authority does it come from and how
exactly did we get to where we at today
and that's what we're going to try to
excuse me I'm just going to take off the
sweater now this is going to be a yeah
right
okay exactly exactly so we're going to
uh so that that's what I want that's
what I want to do so the first thing we
need to understand is a little bit of of
a history a little bit of a history okay
so we we know that that who gave the
Jews The Ten Commandments at har and
according to the tradition what was
handed was the lot and Torah as again
there's the debate exactly what how much
of Torah was written at this time but at
some point because again much of it was
going to be developed over over some
time at some point God gave mosha what's
called Tora which means the the the the
written Torah which includes in it the
written law whether that was all given
to Moshe right now at har or it was only
really fully given at the end of saim is
a big is a big debate but what's clear
is God gave Moshe something called what
we know as the five books of Moshe the
five books of Moses they are what's
known as the Tora the written law in
addition we know according to our
tradition that there's something else
that was given which is known as Torah
shab known as known as the Ora now the
or we know the reason why it's called
the or is because it was not written
down it was given from Moshe to yahushua
and to the zakum and it was passed down
orally for many many many generations
and therefore you had two parts to the
Torah you had the written Torah which
was immutable which was which was
written cannot be changed and was given
as a text to the Jewish people and
passed down from generation to
generation and right next to that or
together with that you had the oral law
which was passed down from teacher to
student um if necessary parent to child
and pass down from from generation to
generation at certain point in time as
many of us are familiar with the all
also needed to undergo a transformation
rabi um realized that there was a
concern that that that the all R was
going to be lost and therefore he wrote
what's known as the mishna okay again in
terms of years
this is generally understood to be
around 200 in the Common Era that
process continues with not just the M
doesn't just not just with the mishna
but it also continues with the gamar by
the way if anybody has had the has had
the opportunity to learn mishna one
thing you might notice about mishna is
that it's written very very shorthand
very hard to understand not only that
very often in the gamarra the gamar will
establish that sometimes the m is even
missing certain texts it's very hard if
you're just reading the mishna to really
understand the mishna why would and it
seems that
did this on purpose why would rasi do
that on purpose why would he purposely
if he's writing it down write it in such
a Shand way have to go have a teacher to
explain excellent excellent so it seems
to me that the reason he did this was
because he wanted to if he needed to
write it down because was calleda he we
were concerned that the Torah was going
to be lost he wrote it down but he wrote
it in a way that still required that
oral transmission between a teacher and
a student and that by the way becomes
what we know as the gamar what happened
was what was what is the the G are the
learning studying interpreting the
mishna conversations that are going on
in the different B mid we have this this
is happening in in B and Babylonia one
time and that's also happening in y and
it happens for hundreds of years until
eventually that is also written down
raashi and Rina they write it down and
they write down that's what's known as
the tud b tud b is the rinic
understandings explanations
interpretations of the mishna
conversations that took place in b
that's the Tad B and then those
conversations that took place in Isel
were known as the
tedi obviously we're doing this quickly
and there's a lot more that we could
that we could that we could be
discussing here but by the way if anyone
has learned gamor and always wondered
like why is it so confusing like why do
they they almost like uh you know
they're like jump it's almost as if they
have OCD they're jumping from one thing
to the next there's no seder to it
there's no it's so you know it's not so
totally totally disorganized you could
be like doing three do and three blot
discussing this one issue eventually be
like oh no the whole the whole premise
was incorrect and then then they're like
well why then why is it here the answer
is because the gamarra is is really just
the transmission of the conversations
that took place in in the Bas medish and
just like when you have people having a
conversation our conversations can often
go from one thing to the next until five
minutes later we're like how did we even
get here right so the same thing
happened in the bass medress the Bas Med
the rabbis would one Rabbi would quote a
mishna someone would say oh there's
someone else that disagrees with this
and they would start talking about oh by
the way that reminds me of a story which
reminds me of another conversation and
they'll finally eventually usually they
get back to what they were up to but
that is exactly what gar that's the
beauty of gamarra because what it's
basically showing is the process of
learning and understanding understanding
um the Torah so that's just a basic a
basic background now fundamental
question which we have to understand is
why would God why would God give a
two-tiered Torah not two-tiered I
shouldn't say two-tier two-part Torah
why didn't why what why would God give
us a written Torah and an oral of Torah
what's what's the reason why not just
have one or the
other any suggestions well what's what's
the advantage to one over the other so
to me I understand the oral as an
understanding of the written okay well
why not write it all so I guess you have
certain Basics and stuff excellent okay
good okay so meaning meaning the
question would be if the what's the
advantage to the written Torah what's
the advantage to something written as
opposed to oral EAS it's e it's it's
easier to remember obviously right it's
going to be passed down there's no
there's no concern consistency
consistency there's no concern that
anything is going to get lost right it's
it's there so if if a wanteded to ensure
that the Torah was going to be
remembered for generations to come what
would be the easiest thing to do write
everything in the Torah and then we can
have it pass it down generation here's
the text it' be a pretty big text okay
but here it is right if we know what you
know you see sh and you see everything
but but there's something missing what's
missing when you have a written Torah
flexibility flexibility or I would call
it adaptability adaptability meaning the
ability to because if everything was
just written and given as it was
thousands of years ago then that
wouldn't enable any aspect of the Torah
to be able to apply or to be shifted or
whatever adaptability in whatever way to
to new to new times okay imagine if we
were still if everything in aror was
simply as it was written thousands of
years ago it would look almost like we
wouldn't even recognize it and soes also
gave the oral La the oral LA on the one
hand has the challenge that it might get
lost okay the transmission there's
always that rightone play telephone or
broken telephone or just any kind of
that you know that there's always a
challenge whenever there's a
transmission orally so there's that
challenge on the other hand it enables a
certain flexibility a certain
adaptability which is required if you
have an eternal law that needs to be
continuously applied for generations to
Generations yes but there's also
interpretation could be interpreted
excellent excellent so so you're correct
correct there also is interpretation
although the question can become well I
would say this way first of all
interpretation can be one of two things
interpretation and I mean what you're
really raising which we're going to get
to is well where does this this idea of
argument come from right if the or La
was given from Moshe to from God to
Moshe and then so why why are we ever
arguing and the answer is is because
number one it could be which we're going
to see soon it could be that there was
an issue of the transmission there was a
rebi taught his students five five
students and each of them heard
different things right we ever been in a
room and we and one person say something
and's everyone hears something different
there's one the other option could be
we're applying it to a new law and when
you apply it to a new a new reality then
you might have a difference in
interpretation so you're right
interpretation is going to be a part of
it but you could have argued well then
write write the Torah and its
interpretation have it all have it have
it all be written down meaning I'll give
you a classic classic example which
we're going to use a few times the Torah
says you shouldn't do
any thank you very much what does mal
mean nowhere in the Torah does it say
what mala means there are a couple of
examples one one example that's
mentioned is which is I think the only
the thir that's mentioned and the wants
to know why but all the other that's a
word does it come from so there you have
the gamar now we're going to see soon
how that develops but why couldn't the
Torah have just written don't do Mal
this is what Mal means these are all the
applications of it and then the answer
is because then it will be stuck in the
generation of Sinai and we wouldn't be
able to apply it or or or engage with it
in the new generation so what a
did was again in brilliant fashion
created a two-part system that enables
them to play off of each other on the
one hand similar to what you said you
have this base skeleton which is the
written law that is immutable that's
that's going to stay the way it is
passed down from Generation generation
on the other hand you have this whole
Corpus of oral law which is going to
enable you to a interpret and apply the
written law and the base of the written
law for generations to come and and
that's really why who did I mean as I
understand did did did did what he did
the question then becomes okay so then
let's get to the details though how much
of this was actually given to Moshe RI
meaning when when Moshe went up for 40
days and 40 nights did he actually like
was he given all of the gamarra and all
of the mishna and
everything okay so this is a big debate
yes can't be can't be why not because
all the quotations you're quoting this
re here and this so there's a couple of
reasons why it can't be so number one
number one the simple understanding of
why it would be a challenge is because
how could tell M what Ashi is going to
say Rina is going to say and what Raa
anday are going to say Generations later
okay also a good question number two by
the way just a technical point a
practical Point meaning from a physical
perspective how you know we we all know
how big Garra is and how how it
continues to develop an all tour so
there so there are some questions and
this is actually a big debate look at
look at source number two
Rashi this is a Rashi in parat Bahar
Rashi discusses this question and again
there's a couple of garas that discuss
it as well Bahar
says in the beginning of the topic of of
of is mentioned so it says rash why are
they what does it the Torah
says said and then it mentions says rash
why all of a sudden we're mentioning har
andita what's what's the connection
between har
andita
wasn't the only Mitzvah that was
mentioned at all the Mitzvah were
mentioned
at just like all of its rules and
details and applications were were given
at so too all the mitv all of their
details all of their rules and all of
their applications were given to Har
okay so this is a very very strong
statement where it seems to be that at
least the simple understanding of this
medish is is that no
at gave Moshe everything now you're
asking how could that be okay so we the
way the way we have to understand it
could be knew what they were going to
say and therefore he gave it to Moshe
okay then you get another question of
free will we're not we're not going to
cover that but that that's the simple
understanding and look at this gamarra
the gamar in Source number three says
something very very similar almost takes
it even a step further the gamar
says the son of says in the name of what
do we mean when the Torah
says and upon them all the things that
hem said to you on the
mountain showed Moshe all the details of
the Torah and all the details of of of
of the literature and any future any
future new ideas that people are going
to suggest we're all given to mosha
that's the simple understanding of this
of this gar and it's astounding and I
understand your concern I think it's a
fair concern it's an astounding the
question is what do we how what do we
make of it one more one more midash
Source number four
Rua these are just what says
the it says just saying it
says play on the
words okay this this meas could not be
any more vague right couldnot be any
more clear it says everything mikra
mishna talmud toos a and even whatever a
student is going to say in front of his
rebi second grade kid is going to say in
front of his rebi was all told to mosha
okay yes then you have I or whatever
that as though okay good the question
right of course although the question
with that becomes how do you determine
who has the authority to do that and how
do you determine what we have to listen
to yes but I think but I think the
Practical questions exist and I think
they're fair questions and I think what
you're saying is yes there's something
there there needs could be a a
connection between what happened at ouri
and what we're doing today because
otherwise there would be no Authority
and that everyone agrees the question is
how much of a connection is there the
literalist version what you call the
maximalist version of this of this
medish is that really everything was
told to Moshe who and and generally the
person who's associated with this
opinion is thean thean in Source number
five tan he is the maximalist he says no
this is what we have to take this
literally
everything that was in the written law
and everything that was oral was all
given to
Moshe all the different arguments all
the different back and
forth didn't just teach him all the laws
even when M was going to arrive was
going to was going to come Hashem told
Moshe the m okay so the Ron has a very
literalist interpretation of this where
he basically seems to say this is what
it was now how do we how could he do it
how does it work out with future with
future free choice all excellent
excellent questions but this is what the
Ron seems to understand on the other
side of the coin you have the rambam now
the rambam in in in one of his famous
works
called okay his introduction to his
commentary on the mishna he goes through
a long interpretation and an
understanding of how oral law developed
and he develops a very very different
theme he basically develops the idea and
this is how he understands these midin
which is that everything that came the
the mechanisms and the rules and the
laws for how the Torah was going to be
applied in future Generations all of
that was given to
Moshe not all of the details what was
given to MOS was this is how the rabbis
can use to expand upon the laws to
expound upon the laws to develop the
laws to understand them and to apply
them so the the foundation was given to
Moshe at har the actual applications the
details the mlus all of that is rooted
at
Hari but not necessarily practically
given to mosha at har and that's how he
understands and that's how the would
understand all these mid what does it
mean when the mid says that every single
thing that the rebi was going to say
because the foundation for that learning
the foundation for that study the
foundation for applying all of the tools
that the rabbis have to explain the
Torah to explain T that was all given to
Moshe and then it's now applied
generation after Generation by the
rabbis of each generation in the way
that it needs to be done and so you have
a process which is rooted at har but is
able to apply for generations to come
yes I see a couple of
questions
excellent the ram is by the way I just
shared with you the r in two sentences
we're gonna now the r goes into this in
great detail and he explains different
categories of how things are developed
so we're we're going to see that it's an
excellent question how how does m come
if it's all where does it all come from
okay I thought I saw our hands so now
the rambam basically in his I didn't
bring you the act the text of the ROM
because it's a very very long piece but
we're going to go through it together
the ran basically outlines that there
are five parts five major sections to
the oral law okay and each of them play
a role in the development of the oral
law and they come together to create a
beautiful tapestry of of of Torah that
is rooted of of of oral La that is
rooted at ouri but able to apply for
Generations the first section that the
that the ram gives is he calls it
Pim this is on the sore sheet for you
we're not on the S sheet now this is
because again this is all outside we're
going to get to a couple of important
garas to expound upon
this means commentaries and explanations
that were given from Hashem to Moshe so
these were explanations of the Tor that
were given directly from Hashem to Moshe
and there's no about them okay an
example would be the example that the ra
that that the r gives is the Mitzvah of
Suka Suka Suka the Torah
says you should sit for seven days
doesn't say well what's a Suka what does
a Suka look like what can a Suka be made
of who's obligated to sit in the Suka
what does it mean to sit in the Suka I
have to sit there only when I sit there
do I have to sleep there do I have to
eat there there's so much that's not in
the Torah and those explanations says
the rambam those explanations were given
orally from God to
Moshe M they were given directly then
Moshe would then pass them down and
transmit them from generation to
Generation Now Within These specific
this specific group of laws and again
how knew that this that this group of
Suka was in that I don't know there's no
there's no because it was clear this was
given this is this is what the Torah
meant when it says this not only that
says says the rambam sometimes in the
gamar the gamar will try to connect the
back to the source the tomorrow will say
oh you know what it makes sense that
sitting in the Suka means eating and
sleeping why because the Torah says T
and says
the you should sit in the way that you
live meaning even though these laws were
given by God directly to Moshe and
there's no m still the gar will often
try to find a connection a logical
extension from the text to the actual
law so it's almost as if they're working
backwards they they have the law they
know what the law is but they will want
to sometimes understand it deep more
deeply by connecting it back to the Pim
now by the way there's lots of laws
where this isn't the case but this is
one section of laws says the rambam
where God gave it directly and it has a
logical connection to Something in the
Torah and that's often explained in the
gamar the gamar is basically explaining
originally was told orally and then it
was written down where God will where
the rabbis will say oh it makes sense I
understand where this where this cabala
came from because it fits in with the
with the XY X Y and Z I just want to go
with one with one other section and I'll
take any questions that's section number
one section number two is similar in
name but it's fun and it's similar in
some in some ways but very different in
another way and that is something
called this many of you have probably
heard of what
is means a law that we can't explain it
there's no the gamar will not be able to
explain where it comes from
okay if you have the law it's not like
oh the rabis be like oh that makes sense
because I can find some kind of
explanation in the Torah we have no
clear explanation for it but it was
given from God to Moshe and on that
there's no either sometimes the gamar
you you'll see it the G will say well
where do we know this from and where do
we know that from the answer
is we gave it from who said it that's
that's okay one of the classic examples
of this the ram gives is what we call sh
measurements okay the fact that certain
times the sh is you have to eat a kazas
and other times the she of of a Mitzvah
is eating a kab like an egg or like an
olive orer it's eating a k okay there's
all these
different measurements and amounts that
that that apply in where did that all
come from so actually the gamar does try
to hint to it by by quoting a but that's
just a hint that's just in the end of
the day it was one of the things that
gave to M and is passed down directly
from mosar from generation to generation
okay so those are two two categories
which are again not argued upon can't be
argued upon because they were given from
one to the next and they're both pass
down set there's no now they're
different because one as the ran points
out can be logically applied or could
have been learned from the Torah
although it was given to us directly
from and the other one we don't find a
logical explanation in the in the puki
Okay saw a couple of questions
yes
sleep okay good good now again the
rambam doesn't say that every aspect of
the Mitzvah Suka falls under this
category of what we would call
um there's another category in the gar
and that is very very that is very that
is that revolves the rabbis in a much
more in much more intensive way which is
the third cat which we're to get to
which is derived what he calls I just
want to use the actual language that he
that he uses so forgive me for just uh
finding it in my in my
notes
meaning where the rabbis will use
certain
tools all different tools and using
those tools will interpret that will
also happen in some things so you're
right there is going to end up being
certain parts of this that are not
straight from Moshe but certain parts of
it are and that's and that's true within
a certain and within many many many
other
other okay sorry
yes I think that was one of his I have
heard that I have heard that I have
heard that the was more committing in
what he applied certain things and
certain not so that's a good question so
again uh it's a good question I think
his interpretation of the word t will be
a little bit different but again I I I I
was giving the Suka as an example I
don't want to speak for the I'm going
clarify which part it could be that I
that I that I miss meaning according to
the ram certain details of the Mitzvah
of Suka were given and they're and
they're not and and the fact that you
need to live in the Suka that's clear
whether you need to sleep in the Suka or
you need to eat in the Suka or when and
not that was already going to be the
next step which is interpreted by the
rabbis in different ways and that's
where sometimes you have
but the basic need to to live in the
Suka to do something in the Suka that's
clear from
the mosha but why are people so so
against him on that oh that's that's
just I think a cultural and uh because
because it's because it's what we call I
think it's because it's what we call a
it's an unusual interpretation but it
doesn't mean it's it's wrong I don't
want to get too much too much into the
specifics of that specific it is
something I've heard that the B says but
again I think I don't want to get too
much into the into into the specifics
there okay so we have those are the
first two categories and those two
categories are similar in that they're
both not debatable both given directly
from Moshe to from to Moshe and past
down the third category as I said and
this is going to be the most
revolutionary is what the r
calls and one way to to to kind of give
a title to this is what we would call
it's basically called rinic
interpretation in this
category gives the rabbis the ability to
use certain tools tools that again are
grounded at Hari rooted at Hari to
interpret what the Torah meant in
certain
situations and that is and that and
that's basically where the rabbis are it
said rules and laws that the rabbis are
going to interpret using their own logic
again they're not just using their own
logic just out of nowhere they're using
they have to use specific tools that are
given to them but using those tools and
their understanding they are going to
interpret what the Torah means in
certain ways certain things will be just
given from mosha directly many other
things and this is probably a majority
of the gar is understanding applying it
to new situations or a greater
understanding of the details of some of
the things that we did get from Moshe
but haven't been fully fully fleshed out
and that says the rambam is where mlo
will develop mlo will develop when you
have the tools and you and the tools are
given to the rabbis and rabbis are human
right and human and and and humans have
their own interpretations and
understandings so you could have two
rabbis who are given the same tools and
looking at the same PK and say interpret
what this means and they'll come out
with two different interpretations why
because K as it were almost took a step
back and is giving the rabbis the
ability to do this now why does he give
the rabbis the ability to do this
because if you didn't then the Torah
would be static and wouldn't be able to
adjust to new generations you need that
ability for new interpretation and new
an ability for a new application to
everything as the world changes and as
reality changes like a classic example
would be applying the laws of chabas to
electricity or if you wanted to even do
business on the internet there's so much
in our Ever Changing world that requires
new application and requires
understanding the base and then applying
it to new laws and that's a majority of
the gumar where they were taking the Law
and they were interpreting it in their
as they understood it to their times and
then the later rabbis that and Theon
continue to apply that law to the
everchanging realities within which
within which they live so
now the rabbis will do this in one of
two ways
generally sometimes they'll use they'll
do this by explaining an existing law
which means they again the Torah says
you can't do Mal on chabas but we don't
know what mala means okay so that's the
rabbis using certain tools well the the
Torah it's heish the Torah the Mitzvah
of shabis is next to the Mitzvah of
Mishka and therefore the rabbis are
going to use the tools to interpret that
what the Torah says when you can't do
Mal must be connected to the Mish which
means you can't do the things that were
used to build the Mish and that's how we
get the laws of of of of chabas okay
that's one type that's explaining what
the Torah means and the second type is
as I said before is applying the law to
new realities both of these are the
rabbis using there the tools given to
them to interpret and apply it to to new
to new generations now this is to be
very very clear this isn't where this
isn't an example which we're going to
see soon an example of where the rabbis
will will will enact a new law or a new
decree that's not what we're talking
about we're talking about where the
rabbis will take the Torah and explain
it or apply it to New realities while
still maintaining the the main law now
let me ask you a question when the
rabbis do that what is the status of
that law if let's say when the Torah
says you can't do is it Rabbi or is it
biblical in
nature what raise your hand if you you
think it's Rabbi whatever they say
I raise your hand if you think it's
biblical raise your hand if it's a mix
raise your hand if you're
confused okay okay so it's a it's this
is nonclear okay and there's actually a
debate regarding what the rambam
understands to me and I'm just talking
from my understanding of what I've seen
to me I would I would I would think it's
biblical because it's it's a Biblical
law it's auk in the Torah we just don't
know know what the Torah exactly means
the Torah says don't work on chabas the
law of not working on chabas is a
Biblical commandment I just don't know
what it means and I need the rabbis to
help me understand what the Torah meant
when it commanded it and not everyone
agrees that this is what the ramam
thinks but the the mainstream approach
is the ramam believes these laws to be
biblical in nature because the rabbis
are simply
explaining what the Torah meant when it
said you shouldn't do X Y and Z they're
just explaining the Torah or applying it
and saying when the Torah says you can't
write it also applies to electricity it
also applies to a computer or again with
all different types of laws now where
does this Authority come
from I'm sorry okay correct I'm correct
you're right right good we're we're
going to get we're going to get ranan in
a second there are things called ranan
and according to this understanding
that's actually something totally
different which we're going to get to in
a
second ra doesn't ra no of course he has
ranan but he doesn't believe that that's
raban here ranan is something different
in a second I'll explain what it is okay
now where the rabbi yes RAB I I don't
mean to be rudas but it's impossible
because you're a human excellent
excellent questions so how can you get
100% I want you to hold that thought for
a second and I want to do the next
couple of sources and then we'll see
okay okay where do the rabbis have this
Authority it's basically what you're
asking who gives them that
Authority God does Source number six
Source number
six says the
Torah this is talking about the rabbis
in right you should do what they tell
you the place where hasem shoots which
simply means in again simple
understanding this is referring to the
Sanhedrin
okay and you should keep and do
everything they teach
you based on the Torah that they teach
you and on the
Judgment whatever they tell you you
should
do
whatever they tell you to do if they
tell you to go left or right you have to
listen to them okay so the Torah already
is clearly on a Biblical level giving a
certain power to the rabbis now your
questions are all very fair questions
wait a second so I went to I studied for
four years I opened up the gamar I call
myself a rabbi everyone's got to listen
to everything I say of course not of
course not of course not so question
number one is always going to be there
was a power that was given to certain
rabbis and the sanedrin okay also we
believe that the rabbis in the or the
gar and the mishna were were of a
certain stature and then in every
generation there are going to be rabbis
of that of a certain stature that are
able to apply these these situ it's not
to any Rabbi that's number one obviously
okay number
two number two you have to be very very
careful
that yes humans are humans and a who did
give the development of the law to
people and that's part of the system
itself and I want I want to take it a
step a step further so first of all we
see that again that that the Torah
itself gave gave the rabbi those
authorities only certain rabbis now part
of our argument nowadays is be which
rabbis have the authority to do that
okay so that's a fair question again who
are these what we call the the rabbis of
the m and every community may have their
own and it could be that that's part of
the gulish that we live in that we don't
agree on who those rabbis are but
there's a no question that it needs to
to be some rabbis who have the ability
to do this and be able to bridge the
Torah and bring the Torah to today's
world but here's the question and this
is this is really the next uh the next
question is we mentioned M so what
happens if there's a m you have and and
they are interpreting or applying the
law in different ways one says it's m
and one says it's assur so who's right
what do I do majority follow your you
follow okay so look at the look at look
at look at the F fascinating gamor which
I imagine many of you are familiar with
and this is going to confuse us all but
I think as it confuses us it's going to
make things a little bit more clear
Source number seven Source number seven
again I told you guys we were going to
be ambicious today this is a this is a
heavy topic a heavy topic okay Source
number seven Amar re abaar reab says in
the name of you might have heard this
idea
before for three
years arguing about
something they were saying is like me
these people were saying is like
me Heaven from from sh came and
said both of these are the words
of like okay okay now one second says
the says
the
if if if both of them are the words of
God so then why was the one who that we
should follow them in a practical sense
answers
the because whenever would share the m
to other people they would always
quote's opinion first right how many of
us in an argument with our friends about
x y and z are always trying to make sure
that everyone hears our opinion so be
we're gracious enough to recognize we
can have
but I'm going to stare their opinion
first and therefore we like them oh
sorry they quoted their words andam and
they always put bami first okay so now
if you think about if we took at first
glance this should confuse us all wait a
second okay says M says comes the Torah
and says both are the words of God what
what does that even mean either it's m
or it's AER either it's t or it's
that's question number one number two if
it's then what does it mean that we
follow so I think we have to in order
this isn't directly in the Ramba but
this seems to be the the the
understanding that I would share with
you this is this this is the understand
that I would share with you when gave or
created this world called or this
category
called what basically said was rabbis
here are the tools I'm giving you the
base it's rooted at ouri and your job is
now to apply it explain it expound upon
the Torah and explain it and any Rabbi
who stays true to the process and does
that to the best of his ability whatever
conclusion he comes up with is correct
which means that beel and B shamai could
be both be looking at the same source
and have the same tools at their
disposal and come out with opposite
conclusions but as long as it's done
with being staying true to the
process it no longer matter you're going
to say wait a second well what does God
say is it right or is it wrong is it m
or is it user the answer is it no longer
Matters from an objective level because
once the process has been given to
certain and certain in our case we're
using the gamarra as an example whatever
conclusion they come to is correct if
it's done using the process if it's if
there's a loyalty to the process and
done in a in in in a way that is
appropriate and therefore both bitten
out now obviously from a practical level
we need to choose right we have the
situation in front of us it's m or it's
us so the answer says the gamar from
from a from a from a conceptual
perspective both B Shai and B are
correct Hally they both stayed true to
the process whatever conclusion they
came to is correct practically we need
to pick one so practically the Min is
we're going to follow because of what he
did and how he treated be Etc so
practically we're going to pick
one because as long as you stay true to
the process then then then then you have
the ability to uh to to to whatever
conclusion these rabbis come to now I
apologize I I want to make sure I always
tend to go very close to Rabbi think
they want to make sure that we finish
but I'm happy to take question at the
end now with this now with this we can
by the way it's just two
two very very something very very
similar to what I just suggested is seen
in mste in Source number eight mste in
Moshe say regarding this
issue
regarding and its application and how
and how it
applies there's a famous line that the
that is not in heaven we're GNA see that
in one
second
as the as long as he does the proper
research analyzes the topic looks in the
looks in the looks at all that's being
written as long as he does it with the
proper and the Resolute is seriousness
and we call you do it and you're loyal
to the
[Applause]
process and he comes to a certain
conclusion that this is
correct and he believes that that's what
we're supposed to
teach even if objectively up in heaven
they realize that he made some kind of
mistake and really he made a
mistake nevertheless says the that's
also because if he did the proper
research
and he approached it with the proper
mentality and the proper understanding
what he calls Co Ro seriousness then his
conclusion is correct From
perspective and he's going to getar and
he's doing the right thing by teaching
the even if up in heaven he's gonna at
some point it might be found out that he
made that he made a mistake because Hal
set up a system where loyalty to the
process is is is what is what is K and
with this we can understand the very
very
famous we won't see it all inside but
the famous of
the was the famous where there was a
whether a certain a certain oven was t
or and you had rabz against all the rest
of the rabbis and remember who said what
one of them they said was was T and one
of them said it was tahor and Rabbi said
you're wrong said you know if I'm right
then I want this this tree to to shoot
up in the in the heaven and it shut up
hundreds of
meters and then he says if I wanted if
I'm right then I want then the water's
going to show and the water with the
river was was streaming this way he
started streaming the other way in the
opposite direction and then he said if
I'm right then the walls of this base
Med to shake and the walls of the Bas
Med started shaking and the rabbi still
didn't listen to him and then they said
if I'm right a BOS from shamayim should
come and say RAB elzar is right and a
BOS from sh came and said rabar is right
why are you arguing with him turn the
rabbis to to to RAB elzar and they say
the following
thing the decision in this question is
not up in heaven now we can understand
what that means what does it
mean the answer is the development and
the way has been given is that it is
interpreted here by humans who are
subject sometimes to mistakes bias again
bias impli the only my my only my only
issue with bias is it implies something
something sinister and and again I'm I'm
not going to deny that there are certain
just like with everything there are
rabbis who may have that but what I
would I would prefer to use rabbis who
have certain not certain inclinations or
certain understandings or certain
perspectives and that's where yes but
that's what akhu did he created a system
where if you have the proper rabis who
use the proper system and they and and
they're loyal to the process their
interpretation is more important on some
level than the interpretation and how
does the gamar end the gamar ends with
the following the gamar says the
following it says that after this story
found Eli ran into elvi do you have ever
ran have you ever run to elvi on the
street ran to on the street and he said
to
him what's hasem doing now what was
hasem doing during this entire this
entire story this is just the end of
sour and the end of the
same in and he's
saying my children have defeated me my
children have defeated me now again what
does that doesn't this isn't a contest
but whates is showing is that this is is
that is that in the end of the day once
Hala has been
developed it is now developed down here
on Earth okay now we only have a couple
of minutes I want to just finish
complete the picture here okay we've
done a lot and as I said we were
ambitious today the r we've only done
three categories of the rambam there are
two more categories of H that the rambam
understands there to exist within the
world of oral law and that is not Rabbi
interpretation but what we would call
Rabbi legislation what does rabic legis
legislation mean there are certain
instances and this was given to the
rabbis there are certain instances where
the rabbis will need to enact a new law
due to certain realities or changing
realities on the ground okay so this is
what one of them is called I'm talking a
little bit f just to make just to I want
to give you guys a couple minute break
before Rabbi finlin one is called giz
what we would call decrees and that's
where the rabbis will realize that due
to factors on the ground there's a need
to enact a new law usually done to
protect a Biblical law okay a classic
example of a is oh 18 18 minut is
something else but yes 18ab a classic
one would be M right many of us are
famili with Mah right there's a lot of
misunderstanding exactly what m is M
basically means there are certain things
you're not supposed to move it's not
always about touching it's very often
about moving you're not supposed to move
a pencil you're not supposed to touch or
move you can't move a carard there are
certain things you're not supposed to
move on shabis because they are M now
what was the need for M the rabbis
realized that many people were having
trouble keeping the biblical commandment
not to write and therefore they were
afraid that if they now they said in
order to make sure that you don't write
don't pick up the pencil in order to
make sure that you don't break a tree
don't climb a tree on chabas there are
certain things you shouldn't do within H
shabas there's a lot of what we would
call decrees denate that were
established in order to protect the
biblical law now these are all fully
biblic rabic sorry these are all rabic
rabic legislation decrees to help us
keep the the last category is not is not
Rabin Gaz but we would call Rabin
takote a Tak was something very very
different it wasn't established to
protect the biblical law it was
established due to certain cultural
realities on the ground that that we
need that the rabis recognized was a
need to shift okay a
classic there's what we
call okay a classic one is a man cannot
have more than one wife okay right it
used to be that biblically a man was
allowed to marry from the Torah a man
can marry more than one woman and then
at some point realize this is not going
to work for many many different reasons
and they establish this Tak that a man
cannot marry more than one wife another
takana is that a man can't divorce his
wife without her agreement okay I want
to get into this I know this is also
very a very you know big Topic in terms
of divorce and auna and things like that
but Hally a man is allowed to from the
Torah divorce his wife against her will
at some point Raam established no that's
not the way it should be done and now
Hally a man cannot divorce a woman
against her will she has to accept he
still has to initiate the get but she
has to accept the get in order for
divorce proceeding to apply okay so
these are examples of where two other
examples of where the rabbis through
this entire world of oral law were given
the ability to enact certain legislation
in order to deal with different issues
another one would be pral those of you
familiar with pral right pisal was
established in order to make sure that
because people weren't giving giving
loans and therefore they established
this way to help that certain loans W
wouldn't be erased after schita in order
to encourage people to continue to to
give loans okay those are different
those are called Tak what I want to just
just end with was that was that final
gar that you mentioned in the very very
beginning the gamar tells us we're not
going to see it inside now but the gamar
tells us that mosenu when When what when
went up he saw this is this is the gamar
he saw Kosh tying the letters and the
crowns of the different letters of the
Torah and mosha said do we really need
all of that and mosha said oh yeah
there's going to be someone in later
generations his name is Reb aiva and
he's going to expound and explain what
every crown on every letter means in the
significance of it m says Whoa really
can you take me to see him I want to
meet this R so the gamar says the gar
says that took MOS took took Moshe and
put him in the classroom of RAB AA R AA
was in the middle of teaching gar his
students and mosha got upset he didn't
understand a word of what they were
saying it seemed totally foreign to him
it made no what exactly are they talking
about and then at some point a a student
asked a question and Anda says Ah that
that's and when mosha heard that he was
comforted now what's the message here
again this is a mish we don't know
exactly what the idea is but perhaps the
idea is as follows m recognized in the
beginning he just it seemed so far into
him mosha recognized what that in order
to have an or law that is vibrant and
that can continue for generations and
generations it needs to be rooted at
Hari it needs to have its base in the
times of
M but in order to apply for generations
and generations it needs to have a
certain adaptability and ability to
apply and and therefore K who created
this Corpus of oral law which is complex
hard to understand
but did it in such an amazing way that
enables us to still have everything
rooted in our history and in our
tradition but yet relevant enough to
apply to an everchanging world and that
is something that is obviously only
something only AES could create and as I
said there's a lot more to talk about on
this a lot of debate I only shared with
you one perspective but I hope that it
was a meaningful I'm just going to
mention uh that this should be the the
the yard site she
Wasa uh whose yard site is is Ava whose
yard is today okay wishing everybody a
wonderful
day