Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Parshat Ki Tavo 5784 by Rabbi Baruch Taub
97 views
Delivered 13 Elul 5784 / September 16, 2024 www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures #kitavo #parsha #parshathashavua
Categories:Torah/Parsha
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
okay good evening everybody I have three
very interesting pieces on Paras kavo
and also one piece on rashash
Sha and uh some of this we have done in
the past from a different perspective
but I'm going to actually not really
repeat them but I'm going to do them and
uh some of it might sound familiar to
you but it's worth worth going over
again okay let's start with number one
this is um an idea from R salic it's
actually in um RAB shar's
saer um neav which where he brings
pieces from his rebi
Rik and it relates you know in Paras
kavo we have a covenantal relationship
with Ben Israel there's actually two
covenants that are made two Bri brot two
bristen that are made between the Ron
and cl Isel one at har and the other now
in arot moev the two parts of this bris
are number one at har AEL and harim when
the tribes were divided on each six on
one and six on the other and the bras
and the claas were given and the BR the
bris continued is part of the TOA the
actual curses the anti bras in this
week's paraa are are part of the are
part of the bris okay so RAB Sal going
to talk about the utility of two bris
and why do we have two two covenantal
relationships
so we said in our in our this is
actually at the end these are the words
of the
God
commanded to to
have a covenant
in aside
from aside from the bris that made with
us
at in other words
the two times in the Torah we have the
to the anti bras the terrible terrible
anti bras that happen to us if we don't
keep the Torah right um the bras in the
CL the first time
in you have
the and the second one is in
the first bris in the first place where
the the claws were given the broas and
the
claw these are the laws and
legislations and
the which he gave on Mount Si through
Moshe in other
words so the first BR was in har when
the Torah was given Kar that's that's
it and the language that used in
our this was said the statement that
he's giving us a bris was said
concerning this bris in Moab now why why
two brisen what's the distinction
between bris one and bris two so he's
going to point
two um dramatic differences between the
brism and uh he's going to explain our
second bris the one that we're dealing
with in our
para the
reason why was the ne necessity for a
second Covenant
with it says in in this is in
I'm G to give you the
of I'm not just giving this to
you this BR is not just for those who
are standing here with me right now but
therefore for d for every generation of
Cl Israel for for for time in
Memorial sh Rashi and Rashi says there
in his p on the Torah he brings a
gor this second
Covenant this obligat obligates future
Generations Like Us in this Covenant
whereas the first PR was only given at
Hari for the people at Hari as he's
going to
explain this was only for those Jews who
left
Egypt in other
words only the people who actually
participated in that moment of giving
the
brid this bris was only given to
individuals were there
at9
ma but not not this brid
the second Covenant in our
par which is 40 years after the
receiving of the Torah
at and all of these all of these
individuals who received the first BR no
longer were alive no longer
alive this bris is given to as a
people in the
right I make you into an a people now
what's what's the origin of the word
IM right what's loan the word IM IM
means with together that's the word in
Hebrew loan kodish means
with I go with you so IM the is the
unification of the Jewish people that's
where the word I'm comes
from because there is a connectedness
and a connection
between for every between every
individual
to become one unit of is
is he points in something he makes a
parenthetical
comment let's say for example in in the
world of Nations if one
nation makes a deal with another
Nation it also obligat
future generations to keep that that
covenantal
relationship because they're all
considered an extension of that country
that
Nation
right the second
Covenant it was also for the future
Generations that came in CL
is they're part of the even if they're
not even alive yet they're part of
the that all came into the Covenant
that's the word from the word IM the
second Brit includes all generations of
K Israel the first bris only the who
died after har this 40 years but that
was their bris now what's what's another
distinction
of this Covenant that we have in our
par so therefore because of that that
this BR is for everybody all of CLA
Israel there's another dramatic
distinction between the bris of harini
and the bris that is given now in our
par
in this R is the din of arv which did
not exist in the previous what's
AR call is
AR that every Jew is AR is responsible
for every other Jew this did not exist
in the previous breit in har this was an
addendum to the bris given now because
of the bris is for the um for all of us
the last here in in in
our the the
says the hidden things are
to that which is revealed is for us and
our children
afterwards we have to do it we have to
do this AR this this inter action active
responsibility
um in other words he
says understood to
do we are forced to do we are obligated
to do it AR is a responsibility built
into the second Covenant that K is AR
has built into to this this Covenant
right
he says how does how does AR work right
so the idea of Y that in other words
let's say I've given this example many
times people sit together at KES Friday
night there's a Mitzvah to be
mades Shabbat to sanctify Shabbat one
person makes the Kish on behalf of
everyone else right and everyone else is
y because the person making the Kish is
obligated himself so that's a rule
that's the rule that he says here he
says
time
the it again
lift this is something that's very
obviously part of our
life Rashi explains in the gamor the
time of
the reason why someone who who let's say
someone has already fulfilled the
Mitzvah can he still fulfill the mitzvah
for me let's say you come late to KES
right and someone already made KES he
was he fulfilled the mitz of Kes right
can he make The KES again yes that's
that's called y Mo even if he himself is
yot he's fulfilled the mitzah he can
make the Kish again for another person
why
so what does that mean this is a
powerful
statement in other
words every Jew is responsible to the
other means that even if someone made
Kish already for himself he saidil MIT
but if there's another Jew in the world
who did not perform that Mitzvah and I
can do that Mitzvah on his behalf then I
have not really completely fulfilled my
Mitzvah my Mitzvah is only fulfilled by
helping that other Jew who has not done
the Mitzvah do the Mitzvah powerful
statement
that's he's still obligated the if that
wasn't the
case we would
say someone who FF
the he can't make the Kish for everybody
else right but that's not true it's none
the because
normally generally speaking if someone
is not obligated let's say a cutton
someone under Bar Mitzvah he can't Lan
in sh for us because he is not obligated
to do the mitv yet
right someone who's not obligated cannot
do the mitzah for somebody else so for
all other Mitzvah in the Torah that's
the way it goes but with regards to AR
even if someone has fulfilled the
Mitzvah so he's not obligated in the
Mitzvah himself but if there's someone
who didn't do the Mitzvah he's obligated
to do it this is the exception that
proves the world theu the
rule this is a a Nuance of this concept
of this only began when CL Isel crossed
over the Jordan
River our para receive the blessings and
the curses at Mount ail and mount gim
that's part of the bris
sh this is the conclusion of the Brit
the second breit right
mosu in other words Moshe was no longer
alive it was done in Isel by yua butes
who wanted mosha to be involved in both
brisen in the bris of Hari and in this
bris right so because he wanted it to be
under
M the the master of all prophets
therefore on the other side of the
coin since they became Jews when they
came into
Israel right now just skip over the
parenthesis um
say since this is now being done with
the people as a people as an right and
also um another L word for nation um
with an olive and also means with right
so
not as individuals so
therefore it had to be extended and
stalled until we got
into was not allowed to go
into how could he do
it it should be established
by but the bris was established after B
is came into Isel when the real IM and
the and the IM iron took
place he was commanded to begin the
bre student yes completed
it they were not a separate breed
it's a continuation an extension of the
bris that Moshe gave us in Aros MOA okay
that's the distinction between the two
brisen and dramatically principally is
that the concept this great concept
of was not part of the first breed it's
part of the second breed okay the second
piece is from saer
um and this is one of the great
um
ofan in the 20th
century um and he says like this he
quotes a
p this is the mitvah of bringing the
first fruits to to the mikdash the
farmers remember and call Israel was
principally a an Agricultural Society
and PR main Mitzvah in the Torah is
bringing one's first fruits to The Bash
giving them to the cohain after he he
dedicates them and um and making the
statement which makes up the major uh
the the central motif of the ha all
those God took me you know we suffered
then he took me out of Egypt and he
brought me into the land of AR Israel
those are the the vers
of the statement of of Bim of bringing
the boring thanking
Theon for everything he gave us and I
want to just point out to you that
according to the rambam there's a misn
people make a mistake they say that they
think the Mitzvah is bringing the first
fruits that's not the Mitzvah the
Mitzvah is thanking the Rabon for what
he does for us and the Avenue of doing
that is bringing the first fruits this
is the exact language of the in the says
it very clearly it's a Mitzvah to thank
the raon right and by bringing the
fruits the first fruits this is our
bring our first right this is a way we
we really say thank you in the best
manner okay now based on this P he's GNA
say over
AA based on a gamor there's a gamor in
chabas a story about the cow that
belonged to rebelar bazaria
sh B
re I heard from the great
rebi mville now if you haven't heard of
R mville it might be you have heard of
him there's a a very old
cemetery near the knesset near the
Israel Museum in that section A small
old cemeter in where this VBA is
buried and there's a great
for shim of going to the Kev of the rebi
mville in that cemeter and literally
thousands of people go and there are
amazing miraculous stories about shim
that have been made by virtue of going
and doing that the of the rebi should
help in the in the in any case that's
not what he's he's talking about but he
heard from the RAB mville Al
concerning the story of
the chabas the Miss chabas talks about
certain things that even an animal
cannot carry if there's no a it's
considered a burden now putting a strap
between the horns of a bull let's say
cow is considered excuse me aasu it's
considered a burden and one is not one
and one there's a Mitzvah
of the Mitzvah shabas doesn't just apply
to us it applies to our animals also our
animals have to rest on Shabbat also so
if my animal goes out with a um a strap
between its horns then I'm responsible
that my animal carried on Shabbat right
and this was against his the the pur of
the cow of of um of um rear vazar went
out with this strap right that's what
the gorah says now the
gorar was a gazillionaire he had one cow
what do you mean the cow
ofar
yehud the rabbis report trar
Al Meer rebelar benar
k v every year the Meer the Meer means
the oneth the oneth of his his cattle
right every year one tenth of of his
cattle was uh was thousands of was
tracar AOL was 12,000
12,000 uh
12,000 cows Cavs right that was the Meer
what does he say what does it mean the
cow what do they mean he had millions of
cows this cow not belong to
him it belonged to a neighbor of
his but he did not stop the person he
did not go over and talk to the person
and say you can't do this but
that
right so the cow is considered his cow
he was the rabbi he was the Rob he
wasar his neighbor his next door
neighbor did this and he didn't say
anything this is his cow not the
millions of cows that he had the other
million he had tens of thousands of
cows every year they were born in
his
120,000 cows were born a year in
his cattle
right one cow goes out with a strap
between its
horns didn't really belong to
him belonged to his neighbor
that
notwithstanding in
the the mishna refers to it as the cow
of rebelar benar how do we how do we get
how do we get our heads around
this whoever learns this Mish below
without
the this is his par right
so why should he get such a punishment
but of course we saw the gor
now especially
Jalem so one
time one
time one time this cow went out like
that
and the rest of his life his teeth were
black from
fasting that one time shalom
because he didn't didn't tell the person
to do chuva so he was now doing Chua all
his life he
did he fasted so many days he would fast
all his life that his teeth were not
white anymore
right why is it the Torah insist the
miss insists on calling it his para when
in fact it was his neighbors he did Chua
all his life for doing this even though
he had hundreds of thousands of his own
right so he says it like this it's it's
a
darar so the rebi
said if you think
about all the millions of cattle that re
aarya had
larum after 120 years nothing was left
it doesn't belong to
him when he leaves this
world that one upon which he did
chuva CH out of love he this was his
Merit he went to not with a million cows
he went to with one cow the cow upon
which he did Chua Shar
this is a fitting gor for as we approach
in the month of we approach the right
that when one does Chua from love his
even his Z even the purposeful of erors
that he does on purpose become their
Merit become merits right not
accidental but they become merits
that's why it's called the cow
ofar this is the one
Cowal which really belonged to
him and belong to him forever forever
and ever okay let's go to the final
piece
from to a beautiful Mak from r hutner on
rashash on a very well-known gamorra
that we're all familiar with it and he's
going to start with it and he's going to
um bring out something very
special this is not the whole piece I've
cut it down so we'll we'll be okay
here's the thing we know
this there are three that are opened up
on R
right purely righteous people are on
yipper to long
life thoroughly evil people Al the
death the people in the
middle they they stand in the balance
they hang in the
balance from R to yipper
right Z if they Merit
they are sealed for
life if they do not
Merit they are sealed for
death that's the gorah the r
curiously when he brings this gor for
he
changes ever so slightly he changes the
language of the
gamor the B the man in the middle if he
merits
right he signed for sealed for
Life the ra changes it he says that the
B is me right he's half and half right
right
if he
does he's sealed for
Life instead of saying he merits
right he he makes it more
specific if this man in the middle of
this B does Chua he gets sealed for life
not if he merits it right now he brings
a question from Maran g r Blaser petur
this is what R Blaser was known as pger
because he was the chief Rabbi of St
Petersburg i' mentioned in the past he
was one of the three major students of
rev salant and it's interesting when he
became the rabbi of St Petersburg no
today it's not called it's called
Leningrad right Leningrad is St
Petersburg I believe so but it used to
be called St Petersburg so he was known
as rabit pburg so they came
um to to make him the rabbi in St
Petersburg he wasn't living there and uh
he his wife had a little store a grocery
store he sat in the back learning Torah
writing Torah writing K and they came to
see him and they came to ask him to be
the r of St Petersburg you know what his
answer was I might have told some of you
this years ago his answer was I can't be
the rabbi why not I'm afraid to pasin
shilas so they said to him what you're
hired we don't want someone who very
glibly oh that that's M oh that that's
user we want someone who
takesaka very seriously and he became
RIT pedg okay but he has a question on
this Ram he doesn't understand why the
ram has to change the language what do
you mean what do you mean the man in the
middle right he's 5050 right he has
50% aerys and 50% misus right she says
yes like this to here's my
question his his his deeds are are half
they're
equal there's no good is not over evil
right it's
therefore the Merit that he
has whatever it
is take take one mitvah and put it on
top from 50 to 50 make it 51 to you
know let it be let him have a majority
of merits of to be Z Right add one more
Mitzvah and you've gone over the H over
the top right what do you what's his
business with Chua it's a mathematical
thing it's a quantitative thing he's
half and half so change the math take
one more make do one more Mitzvah right
so you are now more you're 51 to 49 you
win what what's this business of chuva
okay that's his question so is going to
answer the question by saying that this
whole idea of what his his whole
approach is really not accurate of what
50 what the man in the middle really
means right it's not simply somebody
who's 50% one way and 50% the other
way this question that he asks is an
excuse for us for
to properly explain what it means that
he has an overabundance of sins versus
an overabundance of or vice
versa superficially we conclude
at we think of it as a quantitative
thing right superficially it's it's
quantitative right
since there are other things that play
here right it's not just the mathematics
it's not just the
quantity as we've spoken about we spoke
about last week there's a certain
quality to certain kinds of mitvah right
one Mitzvah might be worth 10 Merit
points right so it's not all
mathematics but
but you can't discount excuse me the
expression the P you cannot discount the
the mathematics of the quantification of
mes and AAS
right there's certain mitzvas that are
worth more than many than you know one
Mitzvah can be worth 10 of the other way
around
so let's say it switches around
right
says shall we mentioned this last week
that who makes the in the end who's the
bigger sadic right the makes the because
you could be a Jew living in in y doing
every single Mitzvah and a Jew living in
witchar Kansas who only keeps kosher but
he has
goes to get that meat to him right so
he's going to be better so it's not just
mathematics
right so it it is also not only it's not
only um quantitative it's also
qualitative right
mik but at the end of the day there's a
calculation of how many mitzvas and how
many AAS he has okay so some misses
might be much worth much more so he goes
up his mathematics go up right but it's
it's basically isn't it basically a
mathematical thing
right that is The Superficial way of
understanding it now what's wrong with
that now here I'm going to fill in the
blanks this is not on the sheet the last
paragraph is just going to be the
conclusion but what's wrong if if you if
it's quantitatively just add another
scoot right or add add another scoot
that's worth that's worth 10 right but
it's still mathematical right what's
wrong with that
right a person is changing constantly
right I do a Mitzvah today I did another
a a Mitzvah a Mitzvah it's a graph it's
constantly changing so when do you stop
the clock does it really mean that by
but but NE at yipper Theon stops the
clock okay where are you right like some
kind of a game show on television right
he stops the clock and he counts up how
many misses you have and how many you
have are you equal are you more are you
less is that that's what does that make
sense obviously not it can make sense
right so it's it's much more it's
something else it's something it's about
the person it's about who he is it's not
about what he does right like for
example even if someone let's say
someone is aad he a sadic right he's
tadic and he doesn't have error right uh
and a Russia does the same a the a is
much worse when the Russia does it
because the is still sadic he did an a
he's going to do Chua right there's a
certain quality to the AA that he does
even if it's the same AA that that the
Russia does right right
um let's see the final thing he'll it'll
come up beautifully
now does
rubub whether a person has a majority of
sins or majority of of Merit points or a
majority of demerit points whether he's
in the middle
right whether is it r in the
middle it's not
mathematical it's about who he is it's
about who he is it's about how he sees
himself now I'm gonna answer's question
is not a question it's not about adding
one Mitzvah
right said
no since he's 50/50
one Merit
point at the time of the
signing he said he's good he's no longer
a mer guy he's no longer a middle guy
anymore he becomes he
says no so why does the ra say no he has
do
CH here's here's what he
says now we see it
shall the the this question is not a
good it's not a question
right the way we were explaining
it a person has more merits than Dem
merits that's a that's a statement of
who he is who he is who he wants to be
even if at that moment he has more
demerits than merits but he is a person
who wants to be a person with more
merits and he'll do
right
it's right
again that's what I want to be I want to
be a Russ I just want to do all the bad
things right
therefore the man in the middle is a the
man in the middle not that he's 5050
he he's
the he doesn't have
a he has no identity he doesn't have his
de he doesn't know who he is that's the
ban I don't know if I want to go this
way or I want to go that way right I
that sadic is a person who knows which
way he wants to go even if at that
moment he's more Aus than mitzvas he's
still at sadic because he's going that's
why the says if he does cha and that's
what this man in the middle has to do he
has to discover himself right but this
man he hasn't
have he has no
identity with either
way
the the definition of the man in the
middle is a guy with no no identity he
doesn't know where he was going to go
so even if he adds a couple of mitzvas
but he's still a man in the hasn't
decided okay I'll do this okay maybe
I'll do this I
won't even if he goes over the
top he's still a man in the
middle and as long as his identity has
not not been has not been discerned he
hasn't you
know there can't
be person has to make a decision I'm
going to be about I'm gonna make a I'm
gonna do CH I'm human I'm gonna do the
best I can
right that's why the ra changes the
language it's not about merits right
he repaired his personality he's no
longer the man in the middle he's
determined he's going in One
Direction it's only Chua that's going to
get him out of this rut this incorrect
view of himself and become a sadic
right and he will be Merit life eternal
life so this is a beautiful
understanding of why the ram changed one
little word in this very famous Gora
that we're all familiar with Okay so
we've got our work cut out for ourselves
okay next week uh we're going to do the
paraa or maybe not next week I want to
focus on yum Kipper uh this is this is
an unusual year it's um Yer Shabbat y
Kipper comes out on chabas and I want to
talk about that is that just a calendar
um happening or is there something very
special about something additional about
chabas that comes out on the chabas of
shabos on yum Kipper that's what we're
going to discuss next week okay thank
you very much have a wonderful evening
have a wonderful
week okay and hopefully we'll see some
of you on Wednesday we're going to talk
on Wednesday about M between the talm
and the the PO and the Zohar between
Caba there was mysticism and reveal
Torah how do we pusin that's what we're
going to talk about on Wednesday okay
thank you all take care