Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Mountains & Buckets and the Post-Purim Era | Rabbi James Kennard
59 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:Torah/Yamim Tovim
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
robai good morning uh or good afternoon
um my name is Rabbi James Kennard um I
made Aliah nearly a year ago uh I've
been speaking here a few times before
basically when rabish Shaw needs me I'm
coming uh from ah good question from
Australia and not Brooklyn not
Brooklyn you can tell it you've narrowed
it down to not
Brooklyn
excellent um I am born and bred in the
United Kingdom subject of his
majesty in the United Kingdom um but I
did spend many years in Australia before
coming
here yeah more or less more or
less words he doesn't have an American
answer no we establish that
okay so um raber Shaw asked me to teach
this spot this week and next week next
week we'll be looking at a piece of the
Milla this week I wanted to look at a
more global view of what could
represents and let me start by asking as
we all know what is not in the
Milla the name of
Hashem uh does this make it the only
book in the Tanakh with that no it's not
actually but it's certainly significant
that when we are praising Hashem for the
Salvation when we're saying Alim and
we're thanking Hashem yet hashem's name
is not in the Milla it is alluded to
next week we'll see one of the key
places it's alluded to but it's not
there in the Milla what could be the
significance of this why is it not in
the mcgilla and what does that teach us
so we'll come back to that question next
question I want to ask is what is the
meaning of a particular gamarra which is
quite well known the story it tells is
quite well known but what is the meaning
and how does the story make sense so
let's start on the sheet with quote
number one which comes from The KES at
the moment of Matan Torah or just before
the Torah was given we
read Moshe brought out the peopleim
towards
God from the camp the and they
stood what
isim so well here's an interesting
example for those who are interested in
the tension between Pat and dush between
the simple meaning of the text and the
more homolytic meaning of the text here
we have one of those examples where the
balance is reversed the literal meaning
of the text is the one adopted by the
midash the nonliteral meaning of the
text we would say they camped they stood
in the Foothills or at the foot of
harini that's how we translate it to
make it make sense according to the
simple level according to theat but if
we look at the literal meaning of the
word in this case t means
underneath underneath the mountain and
the midash as we will see works with the
literal meaning of the word t as opposed
to the simple reading of the text which
actually has the nonliteral meaning I
won't get stuck into that because it's
another topic but it's just interesting
that sometimes the most literal meaning
is not the same as the simplest one um I
Heard herself tell me if there's a
difference between simple meaning of the
text and mash literal meaning of the
text so after that let's see what the
mid is so the gamar says in number two
on the words
and it understands for the purpose of
This midash Means literally underneath
they stood underneath the mountain
what's going on continues the
G so R the various people say this
teaches that Hashem suspended over their
heads the mountain kagit you can
translate that as a barrel I prefer like
a bucket sounds a bit more sort of
authentic he held the mountain over
their head so they were
literally they were under the mountain
the word t implies the mountain was over
their heads Hashem lifted up the
mountain over their
heads and he said to
them if you accept the Torah jolly
good and if not there will be your
Graves so we learn we read the story of
the Torah of mat and Torah we tell our
children about the mountain covered with
flowers actually it was in Flames we
don't tell them that bit we tell them
about the people said nishma which was a
fantastic expression of their
willingness to accept the Torah
according to the gumar here in chabas
it's not like that they were told accept
the Torah
or or else and then in number three he
responds of the is
obvious says from here there is a big
objection to the Torah because the
Jewish people can say forever more we
were forced into accepting it it wasn't
a voluntary acceptance that Covenant
stuff that Brit stuff it was all
one-sided because we had a mountain over
our
heads is a big objection to the Torah
however
don't
worry ra says they came back and they
accepted it in the time
of as it's dtive as it says in the Milla
Kimu theu Kimu they maintained or they
established theu and they accepted hayim
the Jews accepted and established says
the gamorra on that
ma they established what they had
accepted
previously so story mounting over the
heads Moder a big objection to the Torah
because it means it was a forced
acceptance which is not an acceptance
but it's okay because there was another
moment in Jewish history when they
accepted the Torah willingly and we can
see that alluded to in the words of the
mcgilla Kimu Vu they establish what they
had previously accepted so we have a few
questions number one what on Earth is
this mountain over their heads that's
not our image ofes giving the Torah
number
two of all the times to rectify this
huge problem puim I mean we're getting
in the mood for puim and we like puim
and it's fun but we also know that there
are other more significant times in
Jewish
history MIM B
puim which is an interesting story in
itself but it's sort of self-contained
how can puim be the key that unlocks the
acceptance of the Torah and there's
another point there is roughly 800 years
between mat Torah and puim so for all
those 800 years the Torah was not
accepted apparently because the this
problem of not accepting V Torah
voluntarily or not even be given a
chance to accept it voluntarily was not
rectified until puim so during the whole
of B Rishon during the whole period of
the Kingdom They didn't accept the Torah
they hadn't accepted vorah willingly how
can we explain this so the answer is
there are many ways of explaining this
and there are many things learned from
this story uh I'm going to give you one
which I hope will be of interest um I
put on the page numbers four and five
it's not strictly our topic but I'll
just mention it outside the ramban
explains the story like this says
uh the ramban in number four and again
in number five I'll say it outside says
that the Jews did have this mod araba
exactly as we said up till now they were
forced to accept the Torah but they went
along with it because they went into
erit Israel should have been immediately
it was 40 years after accepting the
Torah and the Torah makes very clear
that the Torah is to be fulfilled in ER
Israel and the BR and the the
guardianship that KES promises at harini
is fulfilled in erit Israel the ramban
was a big big Zionist and the ramban
says the Jews accepted the
non-acceptance of the Torah without
complaining because they went into ER
Israel and enjoyed all the baras of
being in ER Israel then the time came
when the Jews sined they were exiled
from ER Israel and they had the option
then of saying you know what we never
accepted Borah we only did it to get er
Israel and now we haven't got er Israel
and there's a PUK inesco which is quoted
here as as the na'vi says to people
don't say don't say you're like a slave
whose master has sold you to someone
else don't say that you can now go and
do your own thing because there was a
real fear that after losing erit Israel
which was if you like the payback for
being forced to accept the Torah the
Jews would now go off and worship other
gods but they didn't they went back to
erit Israel unfortunately only a small
percentage did but that percentage went
back to erit Israel and willingly
accepted if you like the deal thereafter
the deal is we'll live in AR Israel andm
will look after us and that's the
Covenant so it's as if they accepted the
Torah and the time of going back to ER
Israel the end of the first Exile the
beginning of bay cheni is the same time
as purin part of the backdrop to purm
which we won't get into now was the
Torah the temple was in ruins it was
time for the Jews to be allowed to go
back to Israel and rebuild the B mikdash
and akish didn't let them Akash verish
wouldn't let that happen it wait to his
descendant probably his grandson Kesh to
let them do that but the moment of puim
is more or less simultaneous with the
moment of going back to ER Al for
chaining so says the ran that's what the
gamarra means when it says they re
accepted the Torah in the time of a
after they were saved from akes just
like they were saved from parro and the
ramban says it was even more dear to
them that they were saved from akish
then they went back to AR Israel
voluntarily and voluntarily accepted the
Torah
so his Focus just just one moment his
focus is not on puim his focus is on as
it often is for the ramban the
relationship between the Jews and AR
Israel yes people did not go back that's
true and I realized that as I was saying
it that would be a question for the
ramban for those who did go back they
did by the way just I just mentioned you
know we're all living here in Israel I
think most of us in this room are all in
and rightly proud of it um in the time
of B cheni I think it's reckoned between
10 and 15% of the Jews went back to
Israel
and in our times we've way exceeded that
way exceeded that and that's something
that we can be proud of in our times
that we've done more than those who came
back with Ezra and
okay I
heard wasn't was
threaten and you accept the Torah will
be so good for you and it's not not that
you'll be very good
aaut
okay the this the midrash itself we
could describe as a homy and you're
putting a homy on the homy which I
suppose is is fair enough and I'm going
to give my own interpretation which is
also one of many um I I do like the idea
though it's like a Hooper and I can
imagine the saying to the color if you
accept my proposal that'll be great if
not you're going to have a life
be a great
situation accepting on himself the
obligation
engaged cannot
away and that was the okay it's still a
it's a HOA with a you know with a dark
side
okay let's move on we've got a few
questions unanswered let's have another
one number six the r
at the end of Hil
Milla he end the rambam ends each of his
sections with something a little bit
sort of uplifting if I may say um and he
says the following which is based on
Yami others read Yami differently but he
says as follows call
C all the books of the and all the books
of the Kim are going to be cancelled in
the days of mashiah
Milla will exist will continue just like
the five books of the Torah and like the
of the Torah in other words as he says
T which will never end forever and he
doesn't give the reference but I've
given the reference to the Rami there so
inia the book will look a little bit
different you'll go to the Tanakh
section and you'll find five books of
the Torah and Mill at Ester and that's
it now again this is surprising this
raises a question what is the rambam
based on the Yami saying and again if
you were asked to name book number six
if I said we're only allowed six books
out of the 24 books of tanak and
obviously the first five
areash what would your sixth candid be I
suspect for most of us it wouldn't be
Migel at Esther you're sure by the way
in the next number next source which I
forgot to number so 6B is the Bly the
gamorra that says it's going to be five
books of Moses and Yeshua because Yeshua
describes the value of the land of er
Israel but we're not going that way
we're going with the rum Bam's way what
is it about the mcgilla that makes the
Milla St and by the way he gives us a
big clue in for the interpretation I'm
going to share he gives us a big clue he
says that the Milla will remain like the
five books of Torah and like the of the
T now what do the five books of Torah
have they have lots and lots of Mitzvah
the t is the details of the Mitzvah what
about the other books of a
tanak they don't the other books of
tanak with one exception do not have
mitzvot and as I would explain there's a
very important reason why why not but
there's one book of Tanakh and only one
book of Tanakh that has MIT V what are
they if we look in number seven at the
end of the story everything's hunky dory
and morai wants to remind the Jews to
celebrate and commemorate their
salvation wrote these
words and he sent books or scribes to
all the Jews letters all
scribed who were in all the provinces of
the
King near near and far and what did the
letter
say that the people should accept upon
themselves but they should do they
should make the 14th of
AD and the 15th for those living in wall
cities didn't mention what's going to
happen this year that's another story
because it's
three days of P him anyway on the 15th
G so the Jews should accept them on
themselves that every year on the 14th
and the 15th they should do things what
should they do next p turn over the
page like the days on which the Jews
rested from their enemies that's the
14th of Adar and the 15th of
shush and the whole month which was
turned from sad to
Joy and from M to
Festival to make them days of feasting
and
joy and sending to each other not name
and gives to the poor and elsewhere it
talks about something which is
understood as reading the Milla so there
you have the four Mitzvah of P which Mor
says the Jews have got to keep so if we
want to have on our bookshelf the laws
of the Torah we will need in the future
the five books of Moshe Torah and the T
B and Mill eser because without Mill
eser we're missing these
mitzvot
yes we uh no and I'll tell you why as I
will
explain BTO is the prohibition of adding
extra to a Mitzvah or adding an extra
Mitzvah Mar look at Russian ramban we
only have 69
no we have
6113 and another four but actually we
have more than four but we will explain
okay so um why by the way won't we need
the other books of Tanakh the simple
answer to that is there's a theme to the
other books of Tanakh the theme is your
rubbish people improve um if I can sum
it up the nvum come and tell us that
things are not so good and things need
to get better and that is the theme
repeated over and over again in lots of
different ways throughout the books of
tanak there's narrative there there's
history there of course but the the main
message is as I've just uh perhaps
caricatured or summed
upia we won't need that message we won't
be told to improve ourselves because we
will be living on such a high level that
we will have reached the top already so
we won't need the other books of tanak
except for Miga because we'll need the
book of the
mitzvot now is this a good idea for
morai to be inserting these Mitzvah
let's have a look so we the question was
asked is it bosv so sorry make clear
Rashi says bosv is like taking a Mitzvah
and making more of it to say that you
have to have five strings in five
corners in your sitzes or you have to
have um five parts in sorry not sitzes
five parts in the to Fillin instead of
the four chapters that we have um or to
um have an extra one in the ARB Min
which would make it Min um the the
ramban learns it would be like a whole
extra Mitzvah something that I can't
sort of to not not adding to an existing
Mitzvah but a whole extra Mitzvah either
way they're forbidden it is forbidden to
add a whole extra Mitzvah or even to add
an extra bit to a
Mitzvah um you might be thinking but
don't we do this quite often don't we
have lots of additions to the Mitzvah so
that's uh if you're thinking that you're
on the right lines the rumbum and I've
quoted this just because the rumbum as
is his style puts in a succinct and
clear way the halaka that we're talking
about but we find it in the gamar we
find it in the Kish and it's like this
in number eight
if a person arises either Jewish or not
Jewish and he does a sign or a
wonder and he
says and Hashem has in sent me to add a
Mitzvah or to subtract a
Mitzvah this is a false Novi a lying
Novi he's come to deny the of mosha by
the way some people say that the rambam
is being a bit pist here I wouldn't say
that I would never say that the rambam
is teaching Torah he's not fulfilling an
external agenda but it's worth pointing
out that this that says if you come to
add a Mitzvah or subtract a Mitzvah
you're a navisha and I didn't put it on
the page but you're executed that's the
punishment for navisha um the might have
been included in this uh Christianity
and Islam both of which are premised on
God did have a covenant 63 minutes far
but they've changed God changed his mind
he took away most of them he took away
all of them um that person has denied
the na of mosha one of the ikuna one of
the principles of Faith enunciated by
the rambam again is that the N of mosha
is greater than all other NOA from other
Jews and even from non-jews and the NOA
of mosha by definition cannot be
contested
so somebody who adds an extra
Mitzvah is a navisha is put to death has
done a very very bad
thing any problems here anyone now in
the firing line morai we have just
declared morai to be a
navisha um which is obviously
problematic ah okay you're ahead of me
you're ahead of
me okay so we just saw a suggestion that
morai is not a na'vi well in truth he's
that's not quite the full picture um if
we jump to number
11 no sorry I'll go out of order I'll go
to number nine go to number nine so the
gumar again Milla says
tanim there were 48
Nim and seven Prophet tessis um there
were actually many more but those 48 and
seven we actually know about and they're
named in the in the Tanakh
sorry okay thank
you is they prophesied to
Israel and they didn't subtract and they
didn't add to what's written in the
Torah except for Mill so before we read
the next line let's let's just pause for
a minute and and start spreading some of
these pieces
together a na'vi cannot introduce a new
Hal Hashem said here's the package 630
mpot no more than that if a nov or no
fewer than that either if a Novi now who
is a Novi a Novi is somebody with a
hotline to AES a Novi is someone who
receives messages from aadesh baru in
the way the rest of us don't now if a
Novi wanted to add a Mitzvah of his own
to say I've got a good idea I think you
should uh do
something and he says and and he appears
in this town square where nvum did uh
what would people say people would say
he's telling us to do this because hes
has told him because that's what a Novi
is a Novi is a conduit for messages from
aades so if a na'vi says I've got a good
idea I think we should keep a Mitzvah he
can't do that he can't do that because
then he runs the risk of being seen as
adding to the Torah itself on behalf of
Hashem and Hashem says you can't add to
the Torah and you want never add to the
Torah so a na'vi cannot Institute a new
Hal there are a few counter examples um
which I will uh deal with briefly in a
moment but basically a Novi cannot
Institute a
new and yet we've just read that 48 Nim
and seven n prophesied for Israel and
they didn't introduce any new Hala
except except the one that they did why
did they Institute mikra Milla
on what basis why is that not subject to
the same restriction as every other
Mitzvah that they can't introduce and
the gamar sort of raises its own
question they didn't introduce any
Mitzvah except the one that they did and
the next paragraph sort of answers it
but by raising other questions
my what did they seek what did they seek
to find a source for the idea that we
should read the Milla
what is the case when we are delivered
From Slavery to Freedom we say Shir we
sing halel as we did when we came out of
MIT from Death To Life how much more so
how much more so should we celebrate and
sing a song of Celebration when we are
saved from Death To Life as we were in
the time of
we don't say Hal but we read the mill
instead okay yeah that's right so the
great question which is used in the
context of Hal on Y is why is there no
Hal on puim and one of the answers is
that Mill is the equivalent to Hal there
are other answers which go in a
different
direction okay we we're very close we're
very close you can see where we going
with this we're very close to unraveling
that yes
he didn't say that this is from he said
this is what I think should be done
because we were Sav he didn't say all
this is telling me either I'm a very
good teacher or I'm I'm not teaching you
anything new one or the other because
you're ahead of me in where are we going
with
this my darish is a fascinating question
the not not the question itself but why
we need that question if a Novi is going
to introduce a new Mitzvah which they
can't but if they're going to how will
they do that Hashem will them a message
and I'll say here's a new Mitzvah but
that's not what these NV who instituted
mikra mcgilla did they looked for a
source they looked for a reason to
introduce it and they worked it out from
pre-existing material they said look we
already have a Mitzvah to say Hal on PES
we can derive from that we can Dar from
that that we will work out we have a
Mitzvah to read the Milla
onm The nvim Who instituted mikra Milla
were not acting like
nvim they were acting
like ranim orim or the
sedm who work in an entirely different
way I said you might wonder don't we
have lots of mitzvot that were added by
the rabbis yes we have a myriad of
mitzvot that were added by the rabbis in
some cases in most cases they added to
an existing Mitzvah Shabbat if we only
kept mitzvah dator for Shabbat it would
look very very very different to the way
we keep Shabbat because I'm sure I
haven't done a survey but the vast
majority ofat of what you can and can't
do on Shabbat come from the rabbis to
safeguard the Integrity of the original
Mitzvah from the Torah as we said at the
beginning of p k were enjoined to make a
fence around the Torah Tor it's part of
K's job to add extra restrictions
usually restrictions to safeguard the
existence of the original Mitzvah and
more than that they added extra Mitzvah
the Mitzvah of cre Milla the Mitzvah of
Kaneka which we'll come to a minute and
a few other Mitzvah if you look at the
back of the they're listed there the
Mitzvah added by the rabbis so we've
just said that a na'vi can't add a
Mitzvah on pain of death but a rabbi can
because a rabbi is not claiming that
this Mitzvah comes from God the rabbi is
very explicit this Mitzvah comes from
the rabbis and indeed when one learns a
new halak topic the first question to
ask in any halaki topic is always is
this Mitzvah mid or is it midan because
the rules are different so the first
thing to know about any Hali topic is
which piit comes from the rabbis and
which comes from the Torah if a Novi
introduced a new Mitzvah it would look
like it came from the Torah even when it
didn't but when a rabbi introduces a new
Mitzvah it's explicit that it comes from
the rabbis so that's why
this almost sondy line of gumar number
nine on the page says they didn't
introduce any new Mitzvah except the one
they did and then the next paragraph
explains they
dared they ex they analyzed what the
previous material tells us and on that
basis we work out what to do next that's
what rabbis do NM don't do that they
don't engage in sort of pill pill they
don't work it out they just get the
message kazal work it out and who is M
is morai a navi or is he a rabbi well
the answer actually if we look a bit F
if we look at Rashia number 11 on the
gamar that we just learned Rashi says
they didn't introduce any
Mitzvah if you say what about I mean and
often go together nah and K Milla sort
of often go together they're both both
added later so why don't mention that in
when we said 48 n 7at instituted only
one Mitzvah what about kanah didn't they
introduce that as well says
Rashi the N had finished by the time he
come to kanah so kanah is absolutely
pure Rabin Hana doesn't need to be
mentioned here because there were no de
around in the time of there was still
some round the last of the Nim the
Nim who prophesied about the return to
ER Isel at the very end of the first
Exile and if we look at the marha in
number 12
sorry Hanah is not from
gracious starting like the world
but
it's and it's Hanah light will always be
even
after you know that that's what's gonna
keep going okay I I I don't want to get
into into Hanukah right now we'll do
that maybe at kanah time um although
something later on the page we'll relate
back to kanah um I it's a very
interesting question and my first
thought and this is only a thought from
that I just arrived at on one leg now is
the mishan this relevant to last week
this week Etc the mishan is a microcosm
of the world or the universe and in many
ways you can see how the way the mishan
is divided on different sections that
matches the way the universe is divided
on different sections God created the
world we created and God under God's
instruction the Mini version of the
world that's called the misham and
therefore I think it's quite appropriate
that God in his macro World created
light and we in the Mini World created
light through our olives and it's that
light that will endure but I'll leave
that for another time okay um continuing
the marha commenting on the Rashia
number 11 so Rashi number 11 just to
pick up the thread said at the time of
Mori there was still nvim around and
therefore the comment of it was the nvim
who introduced mik Milla but when acting
as rabbis um the says for old Parish
rash quotes the who says there were
around in the time of M but then the Mar
saysi m himself was a Nai karish Rashi
as Rashi
explains based on the mid
called Esther was also a prophet
May and that's why the gar that we saw
in number nine referred to not rabbis
but the N of the niat
because mikra Milla was instituted by
nvim by Mori and Esther but here's the
point and this is why I quoted this
Rashi Mori straddled the two eras the
era of NAA to the era of kazal morai is
the pivot morai and Esther are the hinge
on which this turns so they start
started as Nim and they were Nim but
they introduced the mitzvot of puim of
which mikra Mill is representative
acting as ran acting as kazal using the
techniques of kazal which means we Dar
myish we Dar to work out what the hakar
is we don't ask Hashem what the halakar
is we have the famous story with ends
with the punch time bash am he the Torah
is not in heaven it's for us to work out
down here but that's in the period of
the rabbis in the period of the N things
were different
and represents the moment when the nvim
gave way to the raban and the fact that
this book uniquely out of all the N can
contain mitzvot because those mitzvot
come from the rabbis tells us that this
is now a new era there was a previous
era and this is now a new era and in
this new era there won't be nvim there
will only be
rabbis now at this point I want to ask a
question which is often asked when one
analyzes this sort of subject why are
there no Nim after this time why does a
KES not send us Nim and let me offer a
psychological
answer so the NV used to meet in the
Town Square in the market and they would
stand on a stone and they would give
their message and the people would say
wow this is an important message we must
listen to what the N saying because
they're speaking on behalf of God if
somebody in the Mal M stood up and said
I've got a message from God what would
we do we'd send him to hospital because
we' assume he's got some psychological
problem what would we not do we wouldn't
say oh let's hear what God has to tell
us in the time in a him sometimes they
did and sometimes they didn't which is
better than now record
now already gave him advice that they
didn't listen just why the whole y
possibly yep um why don't we why
wouldn't we listen to Vim now and would
we listen to the VM them and here comes
my answer to the where we
started and that is this the people in
the time of the Nim had an awareness of
AES which after the time of nim we don't
have there was a sense of God in the
world which they were Merit they merited
to to receive and we alas don't have
that why was there a sense of God in the
world it's not just our fault because
during the whole period of B Rishon from
y MIT until the end of B Rishon there
were open
Miracles starting with 10 plagues
splitting the sea very very obvious
demonstration of hashem's power hashem's
existence hashem's care for K Israel and
when the Jewish people were told do you
want to set the Torah or not it is
possible to explain CL that they didn't
really have a choice if aesu says if
aesu
appears without any possible doubt that
this is a kades acting in the world and
you're sitting in Egypt and you see
plague after plague after plague and
then you come out of Egypt pushed out by
the very Egyptians who enslaved you for
hundreds of years and you come to the
Sea and you get worried what's going to
happen to the Sea and the Sea splits and
then you come to a mountain which bursts
into flames and I says here I've got an
idea do you want to accept the Torah
there was no rational way in which they
could not do otherwise it was absurd do
you put your hand in a flame no you
don't put your hand in a flame could you
yeah you could but nobody's going to do
that could the Jews have said no thanks
possibly but would that have been in any
way a rational decision no when hashem's
presence is so obvious you don't have a
choice and that I'll just say perhaps
is what the gamarra means when it says
the mountain was held over their heads
because to symbolize the fact that they
did not have a choice it wasn't rational
to say no we don't want the Torah is
like saying I'll walk through the fire
you won't do it just just one let me
continue my thesis and the apparent the
relevance sorry the manifestation of God
in the lives of a Jewish people the
obvious existence of God was continuing
throughout the time period of risham in
at least two ways number one there were
open miracles in the B mikdash every day
every day you could go to the B mikdash
and you could see the hand of Hashem but
furthermore as we know you know sa for
shaim in particular is all about the
Jews do something bad Hashem sends an
enemy the Jews ask do to shua Hashem
sends someone to redeem them a a chaet
in the ti period of malim it's not quite
so obvious that cause and effect isn't
quite so obvious but it's pretty obvious
it's pretty obvious bad things happen to
bad people good things happened to good
people that was the world in which they
lived and for all that time from M right
through to the end of B sheni it
remained an irrational choice to reject
the Torah and to reject God all right
richan thank you very much thank you
yeah you confirmed your listening thank
you um throughout the whole of rishan it
remained the fact that hashem's presence
was so obvious so manifest that it
wasn't option to say we don't want the
Torah and that's why there wasn't a need
for a rectification of what we call in
the gumar this
mod this big problem with the Torah
because that same problem if you like it
continued to exist the problem was there
was no real way of refusing the Torah
not on a rational basis and that
continued to be the case so I like to
walk around that continued to be the
case in time of Bot Rishon what happened
at the end of Bot Rishon
that's when things changed and what's
the most obvious example of how Hashem
is not apparent in the post puim
world in the Milla there's no mention of
Hashem now we know the way we read the
Milla is we look for all the hints that
hasem is there we look for all the raur
before the Mak as say the Cure before
the punishment we notice the fact that
Esther was installed as Queen before hon
came up with his plan we notice that Big
T and ter should been unmasked before it
was necessary to find favor for Mori and
example after example after example we
know that hamon built the Gallows with
the intention that Mori be hunged on it
but only because those Gallows existed
was the king able to say hang Hammond on
it etc etc so all these ways we're not
just looking for cute examples of refur
before the Maka we're looking for the
hand of Hashem because the hand of
Hashem is hidden because it is possible
to read the mcgilla as saying a totally
secular account of some political
machinations going on at the Persian
court it's possible to read it without
Hashem it's possible to live our lives
as if Hashem is not there it's possible
because has we live in a world where
Hashem is hidden and our task is to look
to seek for Hashem in this world where
he is hidden when does that start that
starts with Milla Esther that starts
with
PM PM is the time when when every other
book of to the the the sorry every other
book of the tanak has been about Hashem
did this Hashem did this hasem sent this
message hasem sh this message the Milla
stands out as one where Hashem is
hidden okay so but but we still have to
look for it we still have to look for
that connection and that's what rabbis
do they look for connections they look
behind the text and that's what we have
to do and that why the Torah the the
mountain over their heads was if you
like a problem from Matan Torah through
to the end of bishan but Kimu they
accepted the Torah again in the time of
puim why little old puim is such a
significant day in the Jewish history
the day of the re acceptance of the
Torah because puim created the
environment where of God being hidden
the offer of the Torah when God was
manifest when God was revealed that's
the old phase the new phase
is when God presents himself in a hidden
way and says will you accept the Torah
and when the Jews accept the Mitzvah
that M gives them they are showing that
in a totally rational way in a world
where God is hidden where they do really
have a free choice I.E there's no
mountain over their heads they are able
to accept the Torah and that is the
Willing Acceptance of the Torah and that
is why the problem of the Torah being
forced upon them because hashem's
presence was so obvious has now been
rectified and it's rectified in puim so
puim represents the coming together of a
lot of different factors which I think
there's a common theme obviously
hashem's name is not there because we're
now in an era where Hashem is hidden
that's why Sorry by the way in before
puim if a Novi came and said I'm a Novi
people would listen to him because they
have an awareness of God in the world
after puim if a Novi came and said I'm a
Novi people would say no you're not
because we don't have that sense of that
connection to
God porm is also the time when the who
bring direct messages from God hand over
to the rabbis who don't have direct
messages that's why they have to work it
out for themselves which is harder
although it gives more opportunities and
that's why the Torah is so great to
learn because there's so much to learn
of it because there's so much discussion
about how we should understand what the
Torah is actually saying that's the
period of kazal which begins with morai
and Esther who bridged the Gap they are
as we saw in the mara both Nim and they
are also the the mar didn't said they're
both rabbis don't ask me whether can be
a rabbi we won't get with that one this
is the OU okay
yes but rather a spiritual connection
with a certain level where with
hem that that
merging at that moment didn't but not
that
intellect okay um I'll probably take a
more intellectual view because I'm
probably more into the intellect and
less into the spiritual but but I hear
what you say that that what I presented
as an intellectual problem that hashem's
presence is so obvious can also be
understood as hashem's Spirit infused
the people in such a close connection
okay we've got a little bit more time um
so I want to go a little bit further
because there's another little piece to
this puzzle that I think fits very well
u in number 13 the gar describes a very
strange event based on a from which
says they cried out so to give a little
bit of a way of what's coming next we're
talking about the leaders of Jewish
people um a little bit after the a
little bit after the
which and the Novi says they cried out
to Hashem in a big voice and then the
gamar says my Omar what what did they
cry out what did they say what was what
were they asking
for some say said which is translated
usually sort of wo
wo there's this thing which has
destroyed our mikdash which has burnt
our our Sanctuary
the and has killed all of the
and has exiled the Jewish people from
their land what is and and
furthermore bam and it's still dancing
amongst us they're referring to the
Yahara here we have this very obscure
episode where the leaders of the people
kazal at that time um complained toes
about theara theara has caused us to do
bad things which has resulted in the
mikdash and the the Exile and the deaths
and and we still have this B sorry this
Yahara dancing amongst us and then they
say
umum the reason you gave us the Yahara
was that we could receive reward for not
following the eight Zahara if there is a
temp a tempter only then can we get the
benefit of not being tempted but then
they
say we don't want that reward below
sorry we don't want it and we below
and we don't want the reward thank you
very much God you've given us this
Yahara which if we reject it we get a
reward but we know that if we don't
reject it we get destroyed so we'd
rather not have the eight Zahara at all
so the story carries on number
14 so in in in accompanying their
request to Hashem they fasted for three
days and three
nights and Hashem hand handed it to them
he handed the
yahar
isodar this was the yaha for
aara so the Torah is sorry the gamar is
describing a time when the Yahara for
aod Zara was
destroyed now by the way there's a bit
more to a story initially they asked for
the Atara for all um transgressions to
be destroyed then they noticed the hens
weren't laying eggs and they realized
some desires are good and are necessary
for society to function so they sort of
modified the request and what they ended
up with they destroyed the Yahara for
aara that's what the gumar
says and in a dramatic fashion in a
story which may or may not be taken
literally it answers the question or
gives an answer to the question why
don't we have a Yahara for aara anymore
we don't if you read tanak which we
talked about a lot today you find the
Jews were very very often tempted into
aod Zara they would sacrifice their
children they would do all sorts of
repugnant things they would presumbly
dance around totem poles like we have
this image of how idolatry Works anyone
want a fancy dancing around a totem pole
today anyone want to want to do any of
the repugnant things that are described
in the Torah about abod Zara wouldn't
occur to us we would never even think of
it why don't we have this desire to do a
Vora like we're told over and over again
our ancestors did so the gor says
because the eight Sahara for aod Zara
was
destroyed but there are two sides to
this coin and going back to our bigger
theme of we now live in an era where
Hashem is
hidden when people worship totem Poes or
trees or planets they obviously did a
terrible thing which is utterly to be
repudiated but they did it because they
had a sense of the Divinity if you
worship a tree you d ify that tree you
say this tree it's some sort of God at
least at least you are aware of the idea
of God now you ascribe it to the wrong
places and the wrong things but at least
you have an idea of God we live after
the aahar was destroyed the Atara for
aod Zara and that means we don't have
the desire to serve other gods we don't
have the desire to sacrifice our
children or to dance around tot Poes
that's very very good however the flip
side of the same coin is when we Hashem
acts in a hidden way we don't see him we
don't look for him we don't darey trees
good but we don't Dy God either not good
and this is part of the postp ERA this
is part of the baggage that comes with
it Hashem moves into a hidden
mode just like aara was conquered the
Yara for AAR was conquered this matches
up to roughly the period that we're
talking about because in number 15 the S
says Alex
Alexander the
Great until the time of Alexander the
were prophesying
withes but from Alexander's time
onwards incline your ear and listen to
the words of and in number 16 the V says
pish he says that bit in that the NOA
came to an end at the time of Alexander
the Great the Greeks coming into erit
Israel that was also the time for the
story described in number 13 and 14
about the end of the eight Zahara fodara
it was the coming of the Greeks which
was 150 years after purm in other words
the blink of an eye it was uh just after
porm the Greeks came to herit Israel
says to vagan that we match up with the
story of the destruction of the Atara
forar because and now I I don't have
time and now we'll come back to this
maybe atah time because this is really
AA but the Greeks had Hellenism which
was different from paganism and in
helenismo of what
that finally reached its finale 150
years later when the Greeks came
Alexander the Greek came and they were
told explicitly there's no more n since
the Yahara has gone that's good but we
live in a world where we don't see God
as much as we should and we live in a
world where God has hidden himself his
name is not in the Milla extra mitzvot
are in the Milla because it's not
written by a navi it's not a naua from
Hashem but it's the beginning of the
postp
era on porm we dress up and on porm part
of the fun is finding who's behind the
mask our task on puim and every day of
the post puim era is to look for Hashem
behind the mask it's hard it was easier
in the time of nim but now when we live
in the world where Hashem is hidden our
task on puim as we read the mcgilla but
as we look at every event in life and we
have a lot of events at the moment and a
lot of times to opportunity to see the
hand of Hashem that is our task in the
post PM era I'll see you next