Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Do not Stand by While Your Brother’s Blood is Shed (לא תעמוד על דם רעיך) by Rabbi Shai Finkelstein
37 views
Delivered 20 Iyar 5784 / May 28, 2024 Rabbi Shai Finkelstein's Shiur for the 2023 - 2024 academic year is sponsored by the Sondhelm and Wertenteil Families in memory of Mel David z"l, מנחם מנדל בן אברהם מאיר וטויבא רבקה, ז"ל www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures #kedoshim #shiur #parsha #parshathashavua
Categories:Torah/Parsha
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
hello
everyone okay so uh first we would like
to uh to say that the sh this academic
here is sponsored by uh in memory of Mel
Davids uh by his daughters and
son-in-laws um and um and
also that's it so she
be okay so um today we will begin ER a
new series of classes talking
about that you should not stand aside
while your brother's blood is shed which
obviously has a tremendous ramifications
to current events and uh also some other
ramifications such as um organ donations
and uh and other things we are talking
now about risking your life to save
someone's life I'm not talking about
risking your life to rescue dead bodies
or or things like that I'm talking about
saving lives um and we will go through
the mot and obviously we will add few
things when it comes
to and but that will be much later on so
first let's start with the themselves
with the sources themselves so the T
says
in that you should not stand
aside um while you your brother's blood
is shed an AEM I am AEM your I am
AEM now Rashi says what does it
mean which literally says do not stand
on his blood now what does that mean
says
rash to see that he's about what to
die and you can what you can save him k
G if he drowns in the
river or beasts or thieves or whatever
these murderers come to attack
him I am that I will give you reward for
doing that I will punish you if you
didn't now until now it sounds great the
only problem with Rashi is that there is
a word that Rashi used which is the most
fluid flexible word and the most
subjective one which is
what does it
mean now what do we mean so I'll give
you examples someone is drowning in the
river I don't know how to swim but the
river is not that strong I can basically
jump into the river and perhaps save him
is that considered
a maybe yes maybe no I'm a firefighter
and I hear I see someone in the fire I
have the equipment I can go in I I'm not
a firefighter okay I don't have the
equipment and I maybe will not be able
to go in so is is subjective and also
what I will call risk assessment some
people like to take risks more than the
others some less so the entire idea of Y
is something very subjective and
therefore when I look at Russia it says
y it's almost impossible to
Define when is the obligation really
applies what does it
mean okay so let's leave that
aside and we will see that many of the
of the commentators are trying to deal
with that and after obviously after
that so rashbam who was rash's grandson
says what does that
meaned so I need to give a little bit of
an introduction here we have a concept
in which obviously deres from the which
is
called what does it mean r r is someone
who chases you now the Tora the tal says
that what that you can kill the r and
you are not considered as what as a
murderer we have it in R and we also
have it with rape thear basically
equates both of them
now the idea of hurting the
rode is
really has in a way uh maybe I'll put it
like that you can interpret that law in
two ways
protecting the
victim
or preventing the person to do something
that he will regret you with
me which means you have the
r okay maybe not if it's if it's here
why not right okay we have ruen we have
Shimon and we have Min I don't know okay
so Shimon is chasing Mas he is
the okay me oh R is for
Rabbi okay so the rabbi the rabbi looks
at the who runs after man
so the rabbi has what an obligation to
stop it so the question in yes analysis
is what's the origin of the of the
permission to do it is that to save
Mas or is that to
save Shimon from murdering or from
harming Mas so you know we have a very
interesting by the way very interesting
question what we
call saving someone
spiritually what do I mean by that there
are aot like that in the see I I saw one
in the 17th century and there was I
think one in the 13th century questions
that are terrible what do I mean
terrible one from the 16th century I
17th century I remember um better than
the one in the 13th the question there
was a
Jew um took a loan couldn't pay it so
the non-jew said to him um as a
collateral I'm going to take one of your
children and I'll send them obviously to
a Christian School and the question
there was what to give the boy or the
girl to give away the boy or the girl so
that's question number one and the
second question is and all interrelated
is who's do you have more obligation to
spiritually save a boy or a girl because
of the influence and what can happen
meaning the girl even if she will be the
most devouted Christian her children
will be Jewish if the
boy marry an non Jew so we will know
what what will be the consequences so
this is an incredible questions that
they had to do that 17th century leave
alone 13th century the one from the 17th
century I just remembered by so there's
also a question like that so now the
rash unlike
Rashi he understood that this
of talks about what about the
R so now this is an interesting thing
why because according to the rashbam we
talk about according to Rashi we talk
about what any case of seeing your
friend being at risk meaning if you see
that your friend drowned in the river
there is no
r ACC to Rashi the PUK still obligates
you to do what to save him according to
the rashbam I'm not saying that the
rashbam disagree with Rashi principally
in principle obviously we all agree with
Rashi because that's the what the gar
says but the rashbam perhaps will say
that this PUK does not teach you that
you need to risk your life to save your
friend's life it's only when you have a
situation of or
okay
Robert neglect yourself somebody dying
and drowning is not is it the righteous
thing I I didn't get it I'm just using
my comments as you do not need if you
don't know how to swim you don't need to
kill yourself to rescue someone but at
the same time if you have at least a
minimum swimming skill will you watching
somebody drowning and dying I don't get
it where does teaching come
from I'm not sure if I if I understood
you correctly you are asking why would a
person would risk his life trying to
save someone else's life if he knows he
cannot save him or he can how he know
the question is how do you know right so
the question is this is the question the
first question I said how do you
subjectively define something that it's
so subject how sorry how objectively you
can define something that it's so
subjective which means what does it mean
when rash says what does it mean do I
need to have level five in swimming or
only level three in swimming is that a
river like a the Jordan River or is that
like a the rhinest in in Germany I don't
know so the question is is that what
does it
mean which will be obviously the main
thing okay now also don't forget you
need to add to it what human fear some
people can swim well but you know what
they are afraid you know so the fact
that I can swim does not mean that I can
pull you if you are I don't know 500
pound on my shoulders and swim in the
middle of the river to save you because
both of us will drown and we also know
that thear says it's the famous M
between RAB AKA and Shimon Ben P if you
have one water one water bottle and you
are in the desert and it's yours you
don't need to share it if you both die
there is no righteousness in there's not
if if to for having both of you die
there is no righteousness in it so
obviously we have a lot to consider yes
but we only started
yes though only started being no no I'm
saying that what I spoke about here is
that what is the origin for the
obligation is the origin of the
obligation for R to save m is because m
is in danger or it's in order to try to
prevent I know if you already have it
look you're in this situ thinking about
the oppressor I have a problem with that
because there situations are very black
and white there's pressure there and
some but some of them can be vague and
some of the of them can be gray like
what like like what there not the case
of but if you see someone puts in the
oven before Shabbat he puts bread in the
oven before Shabbat and he forgot to be
to take it out can you do it in B in
order to save him even though you
shouldn't do that okay the the talks
about the idea of
which means so we have it that's what
I'm saying what I'm saying is it's
complex and by the way in this we're not
going to cover it all I'm sure you're
going to have a little bit more
questions because if we will it will be
a year long semester and I'm not
planning on doing it there two different
things here one where there is a there
is both instances someone is at risk
exactly and it's upon you to what to
save him that itself and I wrote about
it I mean
is the idea that Judaism commands you
and demands of you to what to risk your
life for someone else this is like part
of the DNA meaning you're going to throw
your future your family your children
everything to save someone else's life
in the what I will call realm of
probabilities or realm of possibilities
and uh the idea is that it's a Mitzvah
it's not a generosity of your heart that
what go like God command you to put F in
command you to what to risk your life to
save someone else's life how much risk
you need to take no we're going to talk
about the related issue of the trolley
problem you probably remember the hear
about the trolley problem if you can if
there's a trolley coming to kill one
person versus five and you're the
engineer who could switch to tracks
right so there's there's all kinds of
related issues with with saving it has
nothing to do with Road da it has
nothing to do with putting yourself at
risk but also making moral right if you
you want to make it you want to make it
tougher okay you see an entire family
drowning in the river okay children ages
2 five 79 and their parents who do you
save first you can save only one okay
you want to make it more complicated I
think it was complicated enough but if
you want to make it more complicated yes
so this is the idea of our issue let's
go back to the unless there are any more
questions no okay so the
izra says the following
so the really asked himself a question
that we didn't ask before the started
with what
with you shouldn't gossip and then after
the gossiping the the Commandment
against gossiping then there is that you
shall risk your life in order to save
someone else's life says the what's the
connection whyer between the two parts
of the P says
so gossiping is basically what yeah it's
I'm I'm hearing from you I'm telling
this guy I'm hearing from this guy I'm
telling the other guy that's gossiping
now what's the
idea do not befriend people who are what
is murderers what kind of murderers
many people were killed or murdered
because of what of what
is it's bad mouthing it's telling
someone else about someone else and he
says
isid
servant who did
what the soul servant maybe who report
the death to the the king so you talk
about the the the soul servant who
report the death to the King David no no
no that's the no no that's the who
is he was David's uh I will call it uh
one of his rabbis
yeah he taught him something I know if
he taught him everything or he taught
him something
but and because of that many people were
killed which means basically he says
like that I'll give you one I'll give
you one example of people who get
receive L and because of that they
caused tremendous
death
no that gave David bread and and a sword
you remember that
one and then sha went ahead and killed
them
all
so and that's how the ibra understands
so the ibra looks at this p and says
what that has nothing to do with risking
your life in order to save someone
else's life that's why I brought all
those commentators to show you that it's
not um it's not that that all of them
think like Rashi okay Rashi based
himself from the T the M but says and it
makes a lot of sense when you try to
understand what's the connection between
what between the beginning of the of the
p and the end of the P he says the idea
is what does it
mean do not associate and do not
befriend people who bed mouth other
people because it will lead to what to
murder so just don't be there okay don't
associate yourself with those people so
that's what the even Ezra
okay however the r on page
two
he he obviously defines the Mitzvah and
he says the following
says the Mitzvah is that the Torah
warned us what
is from not doing our
best from not doing our best this is
little bit different than
then that we should not that we should
do our best in Saving someone's life I
mean
from when we will see that he is in
danger oh have have said not
only life and death but also have said
which means I see that someone conspire
against a Jew and he's going to what to
lose all his to lose his
business now what's the difference
between
AB the
possibility higher
possibility okay it's open for auction
okay what
is
okay my my
handwriting like yes
okay so is ability now ability can be
not necessarily my ability it can be
what hiring other people to do it
meaning I have an ability to provide
rescue here it's more I can or I cannot
which means physically I can or I cannot
so RAM and the it's all based on the we
will see some of it
um the rambam talks about what that
first we are warned to what to save
someone else's life a b even if it's not
a life death
situation even if it's a said just
harming damaging or whatever it is we
also need to what to rescue that that uh
that
person if he drown in the
water and we know how to
swim if there is a who tried to kill a
friend of
ours and we can talk to the to change
his
mind and the warning that comes from
that the Commandment is it's a negative
commandment like you should not stand
aside while your blood while your friend
blood is being shed now it's a very
interesting thing the phrase the way the
Torah phrase it is not a positive
commandment it doesn't
say You must save your friend just say
what what you cannot do now why again
because there is so much gray area
because of the capability the ability or
the capabilities therefore the Tor
phrase it in a way what you cannot do
one thing you definitely cannot do is to
stand aside that we don't do
the expands and um and elaborates on
this commandment by saying that if I
know testimony that will help you out in
judgment and I for my own calculations
says oh maybe I shouldn't go and testify
because it will put me in trouble so
whatever it is this is also part of this
commandment everything that helps your
friend save your friends from danger you
must do even if it will cost you
personally if you don't testify you will
what what does it mean he will carry his
sin upon
himself where is the source that if you
know a testimony for your friend that
you cannot be silent about it you must
say it
and where is the sour that if you see
your friend drowning in the river or you
have thieves coming to attack
him or if a beast come to attack
him that you must what you must save him
so according I'm going to explain
according to the what is a is M which
means second century in is in mid we
have two mid one one and all their
disciples and basically it says from the
Commandment of you learn few things
a you need to save your friend's life
when is's at risk life and death
situation you need to help your friend
if you have a testimony that can help
him out you need to do that if you see
that a beast or a robbers or thieves or
whatever come and attack your friend you
need to help him out and the last thing
is uh R so the r is also there so you
see the rash each one of them probably
took something else but at the end of
the day becomes what the principal law
that whatever whenever you see your
friends in danger you must save him or
help saving you we just learned this
morning in one of us
sh that the
positive yeah so you
have so which one takes very good so hey
you see that no the question is on one
hand you have an obligation to keep
yourself safe
now I have a commandment or really a
negative Commandment that says what that
you shall not stand aside while your
Bloods friends blood is shed and you
need to risk your life there is no
contradiction you need to risk your life
you don't need to heal yourself and this
is exactly going back to our issue how
do you define this gray area of
capabilities okay now I will just throw
something will deal with that at the end
kidney
donation KY kidney donation yeah now
kidney donation is something that people
do but you know even though after uh the
doctors clear you and they say that you
are okay obviously if God forbid your
other
kidney um is uh is infected affected by
something you have only one one
which can be
dangerous so it might be that in the
short term you okay but in the long term
no one can guarantee you anything can
someone survive with one kidney sure
people can run a marathon with one
kidney this is not the issue the issue
is that when you have a healthy kidney
you can have only one when you have a a
sick kidney it's better to have two okay
so here you go and you have something
that I brought it something that it's
very modern and the question there are
we obligated for example to give a
kidney to someone else who really needs
it so here you have something that
medically it's little easier you still
Vish because all the doctors told you
you are fine but at the end of the day
you can put yourself at risk look
everything we do you put yourself at
risk when you help an someone who cannot
cross the the street and you help him or
her it might be an elderly person it
might be a woman with two babies and two
dogs and you know one cat and when you
and you go and you help her or him to
cross the to cross the road you put
yourself in in danger every time you do
something you put yourself somewhat at
risk okay when you give your seat to an
elderly person on the bus and then the
bus driver decides to watch to put the
brakes on you know and you fly if you
would sit you would be okay because you
did a mvah you know No Good Deeds Goes
without uh being whatever punished so so
the idea is is what is that everything
that when you help someone else
obviously you take upon yourself for R
to give a testimony okay let's say you
need to give a testimony that helps your
friends the problem is that when you
testify you testify against a
gang okay that's obviously putting
yourself at risk without what I would
call a physical risk of jumping into the
river so obviously we have this this
idea okay
in it says the following
we are in the middle of page
two you still even have the English you
know I don't know what what uh what
happened to me that I put the English
for you but uh yeah I know it's very
nice but don't expect it every
time so
uh in it says the
following the the reason for this
precept is well known
now this this reason is a very
interesting reason because at the
beginning I thought it's a very
altruistic reason God comms you to risk
your life to save someone else's life
because and you need to help others and
blah blah blah here this is little bit
more of a like um it's very beneficial
meaning I just want to know that you
will save me when I'm in need so I'll
save you when you are in need by the way
very similar
to says the same reason for that precept
that why we
have because I know I lose things and
you'll find it and you'll give it to me
and I know and you know that you lose
things so therefore it's like
reciprocity everyone is happy so here
it's a very interesting thing
because what exactly happen if uh he not
my
friend this guy is drowning in the river
I mean I prayed for him to drown in the
river but it happens to be that no B
Punk when he drowns in the river I I'm
there to so if you ask me I don't need
him to save me so does that mean that I
don't need to save him no obviously not
but the idea is According to seph which
is very interesting it's little bit I
think it's much more
than is knowing that someone care for
you and you care for them that creates
more than just caring that's what we
called AR we learn it from our the
entire AR the idea that I can fulfill a
Mitzvah and I can then can fulfill it
for you for example we learn it from our
you know from
what you will never
guess they fail they basically they they
stumble because because of their
friends and the
says you know like in all Jewish
federations there's no like that it's a
m that it comes from what
from so the idea is can you translate
please they stumbled with each other
they stumbl because of each other is
guarant yeah mhm so we learn it from
where that they they stumble because of
each other meaning if a Jew make a sin
in France Jews in yush will suffer and I
can fulfill my commandment and I can
blow thear for you as
well so that's what theph say so now
it's time to what to try to delve a
little bit deeper into this Su so take a
look at the in San
gim goofa
so concering concerning the matter
itself it is thought in a BRI from where
it is derived that one who sees another
drowning in the river or being dragged
Away by a wild animal or being attacked
by Bandits is obligated to save him so
the PUK says you shall not stand idle by
the blood of another of your friend the
says you want to tell me that thear ask
about this derivation but is this really
derived from here it is derived from
there from a different PUK from where
from it says it derives from where from
a different
verse as it is
thought the Torah teaches that one must
return Lost Property to its rightful
owner but from where it is derived that
one must help his neighbor who may
suffer the loss of his body or his
he so
says which means we basically have
twoim we
have you shall not stand aside or idle
by while your friend's blood is shed and
we also
have so the says if you
are if you are obligated to what to
return the Lost object obviously you
must return what a lost soul a lost body
so the gamar says no if we will learn it
from you would think what only if you
found it and if you can pick it up but
you don't need to what to hire others to
do it for you it's come to teach you
what not only that you are obligated to
risk your life to save your friend's
life but you also are obligated to what
to spend money to hire people to save
your friend's
life so we have two obligations one is
what on me I need to do it if I can B if
I can or if I refuse because I'm afraid
or whatever it is I need to pay for a
professional
rescuer
and then I I don't know if you will see
it or not but then there is a question
can I tell my friend that I rescued pay
me
back okay it cost me to bringa cost me
$20,000 pay me back so not sure if we'll
talk about it or not but what we learn
from this is not only that I have an
obligation to do it I have an obligation
to what to make sure that my friend is
saved and if not by me by someone else
okay
page
three says
Rashi page two page three yeah you see
there's too much English writing here I
just say it in a few
words you see you see how many sentences
you need to have in order to translate
one Hebrew
sentence
um Russ says the
following the
says what
is and I don't need it it's Superfluous
why because if it says that you need to
return the Lost object obviously the
body
itself which means what if I saw him
drowning in the river so I need to save
him come to teach me what
now what does it
[Music]
mean it's
almost don't stand on yourself don't
rely on yourself H not word
rely no you have to examine make sure
you're in the safe place she doesn't
consider yourself what you should not
consider only yourself ah you should not
consider only
yourself okay I would say the following
I I think it's a little bit of an
elaboration but I think that's what he
means this phrase is very rare and it's
almost
unexplainable but I think what he
says is don't sell yourself
short but rather think about all the
possibilities of how you can save your
friend meaning sometimes you are let's
say you are the only one you are next to
the river you see your friend drowning
in the river you don't know how to swim
you even jumped and then you went back
to the bank of the river because you are
afraid and you don't know how to swim
you can't you can't save the guy you can
basically make a decision that moment of
what sorry you know you can offer a VI
but that's it you know you can't do
anything about it
you go it's hard but you go you go home
he
says don't sell yourself go and run and
try to find out what maybe there is
someone else call I don't know who try
try you call somebody if you have a
phone today you go with life cards and
all this type of stuff you're talking
about
somebody any River and there's no lifeu
around and even if you have a phone call
he's going to drown within five minutes
and maybe not you have to today yeah
that's what he says years ago but today
some of these things can be I agree
responded I agree right so you need to
do everything you can to make sure that
you tried the best in whatever ancient
time or modern time you need to make
sure you need to make sure that what
that someone that you try to get someone
do the best you to help it's more than
that the best you can is exhaust all
your exactly that's what it
means which means try everything in the
book and outside of the book okay if you
need to write SOS and put it on fire so
maybe someone will come it might be too
late for the guy but for you you need to
do everything you can
okay says the reef The Reef
isii who lived in the 11th century in
Spain and he says the
following
Tanya how do we know that someone who
sees his friends drowning in the
river Beast come and drags
him thev come and attacks him and attack
him that he must save
him what is
it's not
only it's not only that he needs to save
his
friend but also he needs to what to rent
people and to hire people to what to
save this guy so the reef which
Isis take the and basically put it in
now take a look at the
r says the following
anyone who can save a
friend so if you could and you didn't
you are violating a negative
commandment so if sees his friends
drowning in the river or theves coming
or whatever it is or a
beast and he can save him by
himself or he can rent he can hire other
people to save
him if he heard that non-jews or others
are basically conspiring against
him and he didn't let his friend know
about it in advance
or if he knows that another friend is
very upset with his friend and he's
going to do something evil to him and he
didn't try to what to mediate between
those
friends you
violate now I'm just going to throw one
question anyone here works at the
IRS works at the IRS
now I want to ask you a
question let's say you walk at the
IRS and you have a case about Mr
Cohen Mr Cohen forgot for the last 25
years to report that he has few accounts
more than he reported
before and you understand immediately
the penalties and even might be even
prison now it happened to be the Mr
Cohen is the Cohen in your SHO
and you always thought that
he and everything is great and you have
his case his file case on your
table should you could you can
you call Mr Mr Cohen and say Mr Cohen I
would advise you to talk to your
CPA uh and maybe ask for a nice meeting
with the IRS before they ask for a
meeting with you can you do that that's
sounds good sounds
right reps it to the IRS no the IRS
already buil a case against Mr Cohen he
reports it to his
people
else so that's what be even that will be
to some extent it can be worse because
I'm not touching it I'm giving it
someone else and this Mr someone else
maybe really does not like any Mr Cohen
or doesn't like this specific Mr Cohen
so why am I'm telling you that I'm not
going to address it now I'm just want to
tell you that this sh we can go to so
many different
directions um because according to the
rambam and this is what is very
interesting with the rambam based on the
T and the that he elaborates and he
expands this principle of
to so many different uh different
areas do psych someone is unemployed or
someone is depressed and he needs a a
counselor and he doesn't have the money
to pay for it it's so it's not it's not
just physical that a is
coming it does not mean only blood blood
it might be every time that your friend
is in in distress about case about the
what your case I don't know we'll
see okay page number four one
[Music]
more Jew or
anyw there a Jew excuse me Rob is there
an answer for Mr Cohen yes but not now
back next week I'm not sure even it will
be next week but yes
okay
the page
four so that's what the ramb says right
the m is a commentary on the R so it
says everyone who can save and didn't
save so he violated the Commandment
so same
quotes don't need to go back and to
explain to you it's a basically a quote
from what we saw which is you need to
have the two verses to teach you what
not only that you must save someone's
life but you also what need to hire
others to help you
okay I told you that some of the
questions that we ask will be answered
so
says you need to pay him back which
means if I hired a an a rescue team
to save you and it cost a helicopter
ambulance and whatever it is and it cost
$15,000 you need to pay me
back but it is only depends on what if
the NIT the person who was rescued has
the
money now how do I
know this guy is drowning in the river
if you ask me I don't know if he's Bill
Gates or if he's uh someone else okay
now I cannot ask him while is he do you
have
$115,000 if he says yes I'm calling and
if he says no I'm saying goodbye you
know I don't think you can now so
obviously the thing is is what you hire
the guys then you go and assess you go
to him and you say look I paid for it
$115,000 and he can tell you I have it
or I don't have it but you definitely
has a claim on him but it's not that if
he doesn't have the money you don't save
him and then he
says was one of the students of
mahen uh from in the 13th century in
Germany so he says he is already
beginning of the
14th and now take a look at that and we
will see that later on
he brings the Jerusalem that
says so until now we thought you can
save your friends Life by very I would
say
minimum ACC
to now when I have
saf most of the times when I say saf
it's
50/50 in every other realm in if I have
uh okay this is this
isan is not allowed to eat it's a like
a fat and there is Shan that I can eat
okay when I when the talks
about is what is 50 50 therefore when I
see it means what that I am obligated to
put myself in 50%
risk now how do you
know now that's still we have an issue
but according to thei it seems to be
that the requirement is higher than the
B which means I expect of you and that's
the's explanation from on
that that you will risk you will take
50% risk up to 50% risk in order to save
your friend's life and then it
says says the reason for
is this guy if you're not going to jump
into the river he is definitely going to
what to die so that's a
100% uh
um yeah chance for him to die you I can
demand of you to what to risk yourself
50% in order to save a 100% okay so this
is the me remember it for next week
because this is something that is
definitely an interesting very
interesting thing because I will tell
you that even 50% risk still can be very
subjective if you're talking about let's
say fire okay and I'm a fireman my to
for me to get to 50% risk is definitely
higher higher than your 50% of risk not
knowing how to deal with fire if I'm a
lifeguard for me 50% risk is only in the
middle of the ocean when you have
aim okay um and and and for us 50% might
be only you know the first three meters
of the ocean so obviously but but
according to thei there is an idea that
you put yourself in a 50% risk in order
to save your friend's life you have to
try you have to more than try it's even
more than try also by the way with all
organ donations that we are talking
about while you are alive I'm not
talking about after someone is dead I
mean the risk that you can take is
obviously much
higher
sure it's it's obviously a sore to kill
yourself um but let's say you come out
to save somebody and the persons you
don't know who they are they're out
there and they're flailing and and they
say don't come don't come and you what
do you mean don't come I have to save
you no I don't want to be saved just go
away and I owe you nothing he has money
and it's going to be $50,000 to $100,000
to get what you need to get to to come
to him he already told you even though
it was in
distress he doesn't want to live he
doesn't want you he's not going to do
anything for you to pay you back okay
then what I thought you're going to ask
a different question that I'm going to
ask you and leave you with that question
the answer is you need to go and jump
and save him that's not that's not his
choice I thought you're going to ask a
different question this is the question
I'm going to ask you and leave you with
it you jump into the river
and you try to help him but he or she
are in tremendous stress and they fight
you right yeah and then you are
drowning mean all they are you didn't
see and they are very heavy and they are
basically pulling you down you
understand and because there's a lot of
panic so therefore what do you do now in
this question now it becomes what you
your life my life is also at risk so the
question is when do you let
go okay when is that
50% that you say okay you know what if
I'm not letting go now I'm going to be
killed with this guy so I'm not saving
him and I'm not saving myself so where
is that moment now by the way this is
such a relevant question especially
nowaday which is incredible with
theim okay and with other
what do you do in order to save
another's life and what kind of harm
ways now I would say and we're really
going to conclude now that the Army and
a war sometimes has different
rules 50% might be different and also it
might be 80% there is what we
called they will do everything for their
friends including more than 50% risk so
how do we deal with all of that we're
not going to address all of those
questions obviously some of are very
heavy and some of them we don't really
have a good answer and some of those
questions they don't come to ask us you
know it's nice to sit here in the B
midash and to discuss it but when you
are on site you can't uh you can't make
those decisions but I would say that
obviously what we learn from here that
it has ramifications to many many um uh
different subjects and we'll talk more
next week