Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Birkat HaTorah: Part One | Rabbi Yossi Goldin | May 5 2026
10 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
as they say here, "Lag Baomer."
And if you if you haven't heard that
before, then I'm the I'll be the first
to give you the
cheesy little line, "Lag Baomer." And
as we always do, we dive in that our
learning today should be a as a good for
our highly for our soldiers should be a
refuah, should be as good for a refuah
for all those were injured
and all those who have been impacted by
the war.
>> [snorts]
>> And
who should give guidance to all of our
leaders to make the right decisions
Hashem.
And this good of Lag Baomer and this
good of Rabbi Shimon and and the Torah
Tanistar.
The
the the Kabbalah, the hidden Torah which
was revealed on Lag Baomer should should
be as good for all of us today. We're
going to learn not Torah Tanistar, we're
going to learn Torah Tanigleh. More
revealed Torah today. We're going to
open today and discuss
Baruchot Torah. So we're moving along in
the in the Siddur.
And what we're up to, again as we've
mentioned before, there's different
order of how different people say
different parts of certainly the
beginning of the Tefillah. So the same
thing is true of Baruchot Torah. So
today we're going to start Baruchot
Torah. It's going to be probably a
couple of
cuz Baruchot Torah is very very rich.
There's a lot to talk about in Baruchot
Torah, a lot of different themes and a
lot of various ideas
that we're going to discuss. So today
we'll we'll we'll begin we'll begin
talking about Baruchot Torah. I want to
start by um
really just doing a number of
introductory that will hopefully set the
stage for understanding the beauty and
the nature of of these Baruchot.
So the Gamara starts in source number
one.
Source number one is Gamara in Kaf Alef
Amar Rabbi Yehuda
Minayin
the Birkat Hamazon Achareiha Min
HaTorah?
How do we know that there is a
commandment that there is a Mitzvah to
say Birkat Hamazon, benching,
after eating and that is Min HaTorah by
the way. We'll see soon that there's a
debate regarding Birkat Torah but
regarding Birkat Hamazon, everyone
agrees that Birkat Hamazon is a mitzvah
d'oraita, there's a biblical commandment
to to bench. Not necessarily the text,
but the idea of of of saying a a special
brakha after eating.
Um, everyone agrees that that's a
mitzvah d'oraita. She and Ammar, as the
possuk says, "Vi akhalta vi savata u
verakhta." The possuk says you should
eat, you should be satiated, and then
you should bless Hashem. So, it's clear
the Torah is commanding us that after we
are satiated, which Khazal understand to
refer to washing,
um, specifically, then there is a
mitzvah for us to for us to give a
brakha to Hakadosh Baruchu.
Continues the Gemara. "Minayin libirkhat
haTorah lifneiha min haTorah?" How do we
know that Birkhat haTorah before uh
before we learn Torah is min haTorah, is
also mi d'oraisa? She and Ammar, as the
possuk says, "Ki shem Hashem ekra,
excuse me. Ki shem Hashem ekra, havu
godel le Eloheinu." The possuk says, "I
will call out the name of Hashem, I will
call out, havu godel le then you will
bring greatness to Hakadosh Baruchu."
Rashi points out right over here that
this possuk is in is right is is in the
context of Parshat Haazinu, the end of
the Torah. "Ki she ba Moshe liftoakh
bidivrei shira, when Moshe is about to
introduce and sing for them Parshat
Haazinu, amar lahem liYisrael, he said
to Yisrael, 'Ani avarekh khila,
I will make the brakha, va atem anu
akharai amen.'
And then you should answer amen." So, it
says, Rashi, "This is a reference to
that this is the first time that someone
was saying Birkhat haTorah, that Moshe
was basically saying, 'I'm going to get
up and make the brakha, and you should
answer amen.' Cuz it says, 'Ki shem
Hashem ekra, I will call out to Hashem,'
says Rashi, "bivrakha, that's a
reference to the brakha. Havu godel le
Eloheinu, and then you will bring
greatness to Hashem." How will you do
so? Be amen, by answering by answering
amen.
Now, how do we know that this is a
reference to Berachot? The Maharsha, in
source number two, has a very
interesting suggestion. He says, "Wait a
second. Ki shem Hashem ekra, I will call
out Hashem and you will answer. How do
we know that that's a that that's a
reference to specifically Birkat
HaTorah? That could be a any any kind of
bracha. That could be anything. How do
you know this is referring specifically
to Birkat HaTorah?" So says the Maharsha
something very interesting on that
Gemara. Matzati katuv, I saw written
d'hacha mashma'i Birkat HaTorah, that
that there's an implication in the
phrase Ki shem Hashem ekra, that I will
call out in the name of Hashem, that
it's a reference specifically to Birkat
HaTorah. Why? D'haynu kishani kore
baTorah cuz when I call the Torah, when
I call out in the Torah shehi kulah
shemot shel HaKadosh Baruch Hu, because
the Torah is kabbalistically,
spiritually, all of the it's all the
names of HaKadosh Baruch Hu. Shekol
HaTorah be'otiyoteha because all of the
names, all of the entire Torah and its
letters, hishmotav shel HaKadosh Baruch
Hu, is a reference to the name of
HaKadosh Baruch Hu, kidei eisa
bemidrashot
bekal v'chomer. As we say, there are
many midrashim that reference the idea
that the Torah is a reference to the
names of HaKadosh Baruch Hu. Again,
it's like Omar, so we're learning some
some kabbalistic ideas. I can't say I
fully understand it, but the idea is is
that when it says Ki shem Hashem ekra,
that specifically the Gemara is learning
that to refer specifically to Birkat
HaTorah because we understand
that the Torah in and of itself is
really an experience of HaKadosh Baruch
Hu, and it's all a reference to the
various names of HaKadosh Baruch Hu.
Yes.
I
I think it is the same as
the word Hashem
at some
times you
you have to done
before you said Adonai.
Oh, you are you are correct. You are
correct. Thank you. That is true. There
is a minhag There is a minhag we say at
the very beginning before Mincha. Before
before specifically before Mincha.
Before we say Hashem Sefatai
Vi Yagid Tehilatecha", so many many
people have the minhag to add "Ki Shem
Hashem Ekra Havu Godel Eloheinu".
Correct. You are correct. Yes.
>> [snorts]
>> Why specifically then is he introducing
the Birkat HaTorah? I don't know. That's
a good question. That's a good question.
Meaning meaning it could be it was
referenced it could be it was referenced
earlier but only then it meaning in
terms of when they actually started
saying Birkat HaTorah. Again, Rashi
seems to understand the simple
understanding that it happened at
Parshat Ha'azinu.
Um I don't know why specifically why
specifically then.
Um but in terms of for all practical
purposes because it's mentioned there in
the Torah that's why we that's why we
ourselves
uh uh we are we ourselves say it. Then
there's another Gemara. Another Gemara
in source number three. This Gemara also
seems to imply that there is a biblical
commandment to say
uh Birkat HaTorah. However, the source
is the sources that it it mentions are
different. Okay, here the Gemara once
again is discussing Birkat HaTorah in
the context of Birkat HaMazon. And the
Gemara says the following: "Ein Li Ela
Birkat HaMazon. I only know I only have
a pasuk that seems to explicitly say
that I should say the bracha of Birkat
HaMazon.
Birkat HaTorah Minayin? How do I know
that I should also say a bracha before I
learn Torah?
Amar Rabbi Yishmael, "Kal Vachomer. It's
a Kal Vachomer. Al Chayei Sha'ah
Mevarech, Al Chayei Olam Ha'ba Lo Kol
She Kein. If I have to thank Hashem for
the physical things that he gives me,
then Kal Vachomer I should have there
should be a moment where I thank
Hakadosh Baruch Hu for the spiritual
experiences that I get. And therefore
it's most appropriate that we that we
should certainly make a bracha on uh on
Birkat HaTorah."
Continues the Gemara. Rabbi Chiya bar
Nachmani, Talmido shel Rabbi Yishmael
omer mishum Rabbi Yishmael, right? Rabbi
Rabbi Chiya bar Nachmani used the
student of Rabbi Yishmael says in the
name of Rabbi Yishmael, "Eino Tzarich. I
don't even need the Kal Vachomer. I The
Kal Vachomer is a nice idea and
certainly an inspirational idea that we
there is already a reference also to
birkat hatorah. Why?
Harei hu omer, the pasuk says, we said
earlier the pasuk says v'achalta
v'savata u'verachta, you should eat, you
should become satiated and you should
you should bless you should give a
bracha to Hakadosh Baruch Hu and then it
says al ha'aretz hatovah asher natan
lach. On the great land on the wonderful
land that he has given you. U'l'halan hu
omer, and at another place it says
et luchot ha'even v'hatorah v'hamitzvot
and I gave you the luchot ha'even and
the torah and the mitzvot. The asher
natan lach in the pasuk by birkat
hamazon suggests Rabbi Chiya in the name
of Rabbi Yishmael is actually a
reference not just to birkat hamazon to
the land that he gave you, but it's
actually a reference to the torah
because we see elsewhere the language of
natan is used specifically in the
context of the torah.
Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira omer, Rabbi
Yehuda ben Beteira says you I don't even
need that. I can give you another proof
from the pasuk by birkat hamazon. Eino
tzarich, I don't even need that. Why?
Because the pasuk says al ha'aretz
hatovah asher natan lach, the word
hatovah
is nice, but it seems almost
superfluous. You're thanking Hashem for
giving you the land. What is hatovah a
reference to? So he says harei hu omer
tovah hatovah, the pasuk says hatovah.
Tovah zu torah.
Tovah we know is a reference to torah.
How do I know that tovah is a reference
to torah? Because in another pasuk we
say v'chein hu omer ki lekach tov natati
lachem, right? We call we call the torah
a something that is tov and therefore
when the pasuk says you should bless you
should give a bracha to Hashem al
ha'aretz hatovah asher natan lach, the
extra word tovah says the Gamara is
actually a reference to not just thank
the food but also thank for the Torah
because already in the context of Amazon
there is a reference to the Torah itself
and that's the source for having to make
for Torah. So what this Gamara again the
Gamara has the same conclusion. The
Gamara concludes that just like we have
to make a
for
we should also make a
for the Torah for thanking
for
for the Torah. Interestingly enough this
Gamara makes no mention of the
that the other Gamara mentioned and it
gives its own suggestion for why we have
to make a
either it's a
or somehow learned from the
by even by by by Amazon.
Yes.
Tell us again what the Torah source is
Where is it from? If I understand
correctly it's from it's from from
this reference to
to to to But it's from not from
No no no no I believe the is there in I
don't remember exactly where actually
quotes that it's mentioned by I don't
remember specifically maybe someone can
even check. If I'm not mistaken
either right before
the or before it mentions the phrase
or
or or or or or or or or or
If anyone wants to fact check me on that
you're welcome to.
And what does it say?
I got no hits. So it could be I'm
mistaken so it could be it could be I'm
mistaken. I seem to recall that it is
there.
I typed something in wrong. Yeah. If
anyone wants to check you're welcome to
check. The beauty of
beauty of 2026.
If I'm wrong then I appreciate the
correction. But actually certainly
references that it was said in the
context of you
I seem to recall that it was the itself
is there as well but I but But be wrong.
Thank you. Okay.
Um the Gemara so so those are two
Gemaras that discuss the source for
Birkat Birkat HaTorah. And then the
other major Gemara that we have that we
need to discuss is the Gemara that
discusses the text of Birkat HaTorah.
Someone found it? Yes, sure. Baruch
Hashem Gimel.
Okay, so it's Someone Someone thinks
they found it in Hazinu. I think it is
in I think it's in I think it's in
Hazinu. Okay.
>> [snorts]
>> So the Gemara says, this is another
Gemara different context. The Gemara
discusses, what is the text of of Birkat
HaTorah? And the Birkat HaTorah Birkat
HaTorah I should say is really
fascinating. Again, we're not going to
delve into all of the details this week,
but there's a lot to talk about here in
terms of what type of bracha is this? Is
this a Birkat Mitzvah? Is this a Birkat
Shevach? Maybe it's both. How many
brachot are there? There's a debate
whether there's two brachot here or
three brachot, three independent
brachot. Um and each of the each of
those opinions has something very
interesting to teach us about the nature
of these brachot. We'll get into it, but
let's just look at the actual text
itself. Amar Rabbi Yehuda, "Mai Mai
mevarech?" What's the bracha that I
should make for Birkat HaTorah? Amar
Rabbi Yehuda Amar Shmuel, "Asher
kidishanu b'mitzvotav v'tzivanu lasok
b'divrei Torah." The first bracha is,
"Thank you Hashem or blessed are you
Hashem that you commanded me
lasok b'divrei Torah, to be involved in
the words of Torah." Again, we'll have
to talk about why does it say lasok as
opposed to lilmod? Okay, the simple
understanding would be lilmod. Lasok
implies something much more much more
intensive, much more much more involved.
Rabbi Yochanan Amar Mesayavin Bachari.
Rabbi Yochanan would add on the
following, "Ha'arevna Hashem Elokeinu et
divrei Torah b'finu uv'fiot Amcha Beit
Yisrael." Ha'arev means like it should
be beautiful, it should be pleasant.
Please Hakadosh Baruch Hu, let the
learning be pleasant. The words of your
Torah should be pleasant in our mouths
and in the mouths of um of of of Am
Yisrael. V'ni Anachnu, and we should be
v'tse'etse'enu our and our and our
children v'tse'etse'e Am Yisrael and all
of the descendants of Am Yisrael kulanu
yode'ei sh'mecha v'oskei toratecha, that
we should all be those who know all of
our us and our descendants should be the
of people who know Torah and who are
involved in Torah. Again, you may notice
that there's certain things that are
missing from here that we have in our
text like oskei toratecha lishmah is
added later on or is added in our text.
We'll get to some of those details. Even
the harevna, is it v'harevna or harevna?
That depends on whether you understand
this to be a separate bracha or
continuation of the first bracha.
So, there are nuances that are that are
that are not in this in this Gemara in
this in this Gemara. Baruch Atah Hashem
hamelamed Torah l'amo Yisrael, blessed
are you Hashem that you teach Torah to
Am Yisrael. Again, reference the fact
that when we learn Torah, we're not just
learning from Hakadosh Baruchu is an
incredibly inspiring
idea, which we'll get to. Rav Amnuna
amar Rav Amnuna says a different bracha,
asher bachar banu mikol ha'amim, that
you have chosen us from amongst all of
the nations v'nasan lanu es toraso, and
you have given us our Torah. Baruch Atah
Hashem noten haTorah, blessed are you
Hashem who has given us the Torah. Amar
Rav Amnuna closes Rav Amnuna with zohi
me'ulah sheb'brachot. He says, in my
opinion, my bracha, if I can say so
myself, says Rav Amnuna, is the best of
the brachot. Now, why is it the best of
the brachot? So, Rashi suggests that the
reason why this is the best of the
brachot is because, if you look at Rashi
right here in source number four,
l'fi sheyeish ba hoda'ah l'makom, it's
on the one hand it thanks Hakadosh
Baruchu and kilus l'Torah u'l'Yisrael,
and it also is a praise to Am Yisrael
and to the Torah, because we're we're
talking about how we were chosen by
Hakadosh Baruchu and we were given the
Torah, and that's talking about the
uniqueness of both us and the Torah, and
it thanks Hashem. Therefore, says Rav
Amnuna, I think this is the best bracha.
And then we close the Gemara ends,
"Hilchach limrin hu l'chulhu." All of
these, says the Gemara, these all sound
like nice ideas. So, you know what?
Instead of picking one, we'll say all of
them. And that's exactly what we do. I
mean, the Gemara had listed three
suggestions, and then it concludes with,
"We should say all of them." Yes. I'm
new here, so maybe you discussed this
before, but what exactly is Torah? Is
reading a book on halacha Torah is
this session Torah or just the Gemara
and Chumash? So, first of all, welcome.
And we always we always welcome
questions, no matter what. It's an
excellent excellent question. So, first
of all, I certainly think that this is
learning Torah.
What is considered
Well, I would say two things. In in the
context of Birkat HaTorah,
because we know, as we're going to see,
that this is a bracha that on the one
hand we generally make every day, but
you're also supposed to make it as a
Meaning, again, this gets into a larger
discussion. This is a Birkat Mitzvah or
Birkat Shevach. It's a Birkat Mitzvah
right before you learn Torah, anytime
you learn Torah. If you're going to wake
up at 5:00 in the morning, and you're
going to learn Torah, which is how we
pasken. If you're going to learn Torah,
you need to say this bracha before you
learn Torah, even if it's not part of
the tfillah yet, even if you're going to
daven later.
If it's a Birkat Shevach, you might say
that this is just about thanking Hashem
for the Torah,
not connected to the act of learning
Torah. We pasken
like both. Again, we'll discuss this in
more detail, hopefully next time,
that we actually believe it's both. It's
a almost a Birkat Mitzvah. We should say
it before we learn, but there's also
this this there's a whole debate. Do I
have to learn right after I say the
bracha, or can I just say the bracha,
similar to when I thank Hashem before
opening up my eyes, and similar to we as
we see, very often we make bracha even
before we actually do the action. It's
maybe just thanking Hashem for the
concept of Torah. So, it's an excellent
question.
In terms of There is a huge halachic
debate regarding that. What if I What if
I'm going to wake up, and I'm going to
think about Torah?
Do I have to say Birkat HaTorah?
What if I'm going to talk about Torah,
but I'm not going to delve So, it's an
excellent it's an excellent it's a whole
debate in the in the in in in the in the
in the post scheme
regarding what is defined as can I
listen to a sheer?
I'm not saying anything. I'm just
listening. Do I need Do I need Do I need
to So, those these are all excellent
questions. But, as we shall get to them.
Uh but we generally we generally assume
that if you're going to be involved in
Torah uh
in some way, certainly if you're going
to be talking Torah, listening to a
sheer, if you're just going to be
thinking about Torah, there's that
that's unclear in the post scheme if you
need to. We generally assume that if
you're involved in the act of Torah in
some way, you should make the bracha.
Now, what qualifies as Torah? Meaning
like what if I'm listening What if I'm
reading a you know a godol story and
it's inspiring me in my spirituality,
but I'm not necessarily So, those again,
that's also a very good question. Can
you read those books in the bathroom?
Also good meaning So, this is you know,
but these are all connected to how you
view these things. So, I don't want to
you know, get specific, but
>> Practically, should we make a bracha
today listening to this? You should yes.
Before you came to this sheer, you
absolutely should have. Everybody
should? Everybody should. Hopefully, you
did if you davened. Meaning as part of
davening, we have the text of Birkot
haTorah. You don't need to say it again.
Meaning we believe you say it once in
the morning and that qualifies We'll
talk about
That's an excellent question as well.
There's a famous question in Tosfos.
You're asking a lot of good questions.
Tosfos asked a famous question, which
we'll get to. The Tosfos famous question
is
usually when you do a mitzvah when you
do a bracha before a mitzvah, you say
the bracha, you do the mitzvah, and if 5
hours later you do the mitzvah again,
what do you need to do? Make another
bracha. Says Tosfos, how could it be we
make a bracha in the morning, I learn
some Torah, I then go to work or I go to
the I don't know, I go I I exercise, I
eat lunch, I eat breakfast. 5 hours
later, if I want to make a bracha again,
I need to make I don't need I I don't
make the bracha again. We only make it
once a day. That's Tosfos's question.
For those of you who have an answer,
keep it to yourselves. I'm going to
leave you with a cliffhanger a little
bit. Tosfos gives a beautiful answer and
there are a number of beautiful answers
to this question. But, all of these
questions were we will be as well as I
get to so I hope you you know stay with
us but but it's an excellent excellent
question.
Yes.
Right away if we say the
Torah do we read from the Excellent.
Correct. There's correct. Correct. Our
minhag our practical minhag is that in
the morning as part of the seder after
we say
we do say parts we say some
we say some we say some
and that is because of the opinion that
says that right after you make the
you need to learn Torah right away. Not
everyone says you have to and we'll talk
about why that is but yes that is
correct.
>> when we when we read from the Torah then
the before every aliya Correct. In
addition in addition before people get
the aliya they also make a that everyone
agrees is
that's the
that's that's what's called that's
because we're reading the Torah publicly
therefore we do that by the way it's an
interesting snippet is that it used to
be in the time of the
when there were three aliyas the only
the only people who made the were the
person the first the
would make the first aliya
but but
and the
whoever got the last aliya would make
the at the end the people in the middle
wouldn't say a before and after or the
or the first person would say after and
then because of confusion and people
would think that they didn't say the and
people came in late or walked in or or
walked out in the middle therefore they
made it that every makes their own
but that's but that everyone agrees is
because pretty much every the idea is
that everyone has already said it and
therefore you are
because of
and the public reading we have the to to
make the
uh there as well. Okay.
Let's keep going. So now so as we saw
this the suggests that we that we gives
the three different suggestions or two
and a
two suggestions as we'll see of of the
we have the right to say all three. One
final important just as a way of giving
us all the major the major sources
before we delve into some of the
details.
Um is the Gamara in source number five.
Now source number five is a fascinating
Gamara but also a challenging Gamara to
fully understand.
Sheluchay mitam, they sent from them. So
it was sent from from some from from a
from a a city. Hizaharu
be'ir buvita hizaharu bechabura hizaharu
bivnay aniyim shema shemayhen tetzei
Torah. You should be careful of your
community and certainly it says at the
very end you should also make sure to be
nice and be careful to the children of
poor people. Why? Because the future of
Torah is going to come from the masses.
It's going to come from the from the
poor people, from those who are
generally less educated.
What as the pasuk says, yizal mayim
midalyo shemayhen tetzei Torah. That the
water will drip from the from the bucket
cuz from there the Torah will come.
As the Gamara, why are we assuming that
we need the bnei aniyim um bnei ma'in
mitzuyin talmidei chachamim latzeit
talmidei chachamim mibneihem. Why do you
need the poor people to to bring out the
Torah? Why can't we you have talmidei
chachamim, they have children. Why can't
their children be the future talmidei
chachamim? Why are we assuming that you
need to deal with the masses are needed
for the Torah? Every all the gedolim
have children, let them become gedolim.
Why don't they become gedolim? And as
the son of a rabbi, we have what's
called the rabbi's son syndrome or the
preacher's kid, right? There's always
the idea that very often the children of
of preachers or of rabbis tend to have
challenges. So again, what's what's the
why is it that the children of of
talmidei chachamim often don't continue
in the same path? Amar Rav Yosef, shelo
yomru Torah yerusha hilachem. The reason
why that happens in general is because
people will think that the ability to
learn Torah or to become great in Torah
is an inheritance. That the only people
who can become great are the people
whose poor parents were rabbis and
that's not true. Anyone has the choice
to become great in Torah learning. You
You Learning Torah greatness in Torah is
not something you inherit from your
father or from your parents. Rather,
it's something that you accomplish on
your own. And in order to show that or
to highlight that, that is why in
general, again, this is not got into the
comment and that's why tell me that I'm
tend not to have children who are not
tell me that not tell me that I'm
of shades braid of media mark today
shall we got rule a lot of war. So that
they're not going to be harsh to the
community. If if Torah greatness becomes
somewhat of a of you know, of where
there's nepotism and it becomes somewhat
of just you know, a situation where it's
in a stock aristocracy in a way passed
down from parent to child, it ends up
not being appropriate and not being fair
for the community.
My suit about it may God be with
you because they're going to become
tough on the community.
I will just skip skip now just because
of just because of the last line.
And this is the most important for us.
Why is it that rabbis kids or children
of
don't become tell me that
she may
be a Torah the reason is is because they
didn't say the of
Torah. These rabbis or the children of
these rabbis didn't properly say Torah
and as a result therefore their children
didn't become tell me that
the love you of my love as
says my Steve what does it mean when it
says in your me out
me how she had me out of so that for a
second let's look let's skip now to
source number six for one second. Source
number six I brought you the from your
me out.
You're me out is describing the
destruction of your show line.
It's source number six
and I taught you your show line
and I will turn your show line into
waves the abode of turning can mean can
mean mean can either mean a reference to
the to big to big fish or it can also be
a reference to alligators. Basically,
Jerusalem turns into a wave of of
animals coming and destroying. That are
are
will become desolate without anyone
there.
Says
me
who is the wise person who will
understand what's happening and why it's
happening?
And I've got
and will ask the following question, why
is the land becoming lost? Why is this
happening?
Why is the entire the entire desert
becoming lit up and destroyed without
anybody coming by? Meaning this this
destruction is happening and if you're
smart, you'll ask the question, why?
What's going on? What is the cause of
all of this? And then
answers
because they left my Torah that I should
not tell you
that I put before them and they should
not
and they didn't listen to me and they
and they didn't follow in my ways and
they and they followed
rather their own hearts and they and
they followed
and they followed after the
that their that their that that that
their that their parents had had had
taught them.
Says the and I'm going back to the three
lines from the bottom. Three lines from
the bottom in source number five. What
does the mean when it says who is the
smart person who will ask about this?
The
and the were all asked, what's the
reason for this and no one gave a
response
until gave his own explanation. The
the
and the Torah says
The passage says because they left my
Torah. Ask the is there a repetition in
the pasuk. The pasuk says, "They left my
Torah,
they didn't listen to me, and they
didn't follow me." Says the Gamara,
that's repe- that's that's repetition,
it's redundant. You already later on in
the pasuk you say that they didn't that
they didn't listen to me and they didn't
follow the Torah. What does it mean "al
lo sham'u b'torati"? That's repe- it's
it's redundant, it's unnecessary.
Answers the Gamara, Amar Rav Yehuda Amar
Rav, "She'ein m'var'chin baTorah
t'chilah." The issue wasn't just that
they didn't follow the Torah, the issue
was that they didn't make the bracha of
birkas haTorah. Now, for those of you
who have seen this Many of you may have
seen this Gamara, it's a fairly
well-known Gamara. Those of you who are
seeing this for the first time are
probably shaking their heads and saying,
"What?
That's the reason? The reason for so
much destruction is because they didn't
make the bracha? So, if they learned
Torah, they spent all their day learning
Torah, but they didn't they forgot to
make the bracha, or they were in they
they were negligent and they didn't make
the bracha, that's the reason?"
So, that that is the obvious question.
And as Rashi says, again, keep your a
bit of a cliffhanger, we're going to see
a number of approaches as to what this
Obviously, there's something deeper
here. That not saying birkas haTorah or
a reference to not saying birkas haTorah
refers to a certain attitude towards the
Torah study, and an attitude and
approach to Torah in general that was
considered to be problematic. And that's
what the that's what the Gamara is
referring here. The question that I want
to understand is what exactly was that
approach. But, what we see from this
Gamara,
again, for us right now, is we see that
there clearly is something fundamental
about birkas haTorah. Birkas haTorah are
not just regular brachot, we saw already
we saw we saw just now a number of
Gamarot that seem to hint to it being
biblical, being d'oraita, we're going to
get to that right now, whether it's
d'oraita or d'rabbanan. We see a Gamara
that clearly says that that the lack of
birkas haTorah caused destruction for
the Jewish people. We have to understand
that, but that already highlights for us
that there's something very fundamental
about these brachot. And then, the final
the final source I want to bring for you
to highlight again the uniqueness of
this bracha or the importance of this
bracha is a line in the Shulchan Aruch.
The Shulchan Aruch in source number
seven has a Now, again, remembering that
the Shulchan Aruch is a is a halacha
safer. He says something which he does
as I as I understand does not say very
often at all. Source number seven,
birkot haTorah tzrichim l'hizaher ba
me'od. When it comes to birkot haTorah,
you have to be very very careful. You
have to make sure to say these brachot.
This is probably due to this Gemara and
the other Gemara that we've seen. And we
see this also in the conversations in
the poskim. We're going to see soon the
conversation in the poskim regarding if
what what happens if you forget to say
birkot haTorah and you or you're not
sure if you said birkot haTorah. So,
that's going to be very connected to our
question, well, is the bracha de'oraita?
Is it biblical? Or or is it derabanan?
Is it rabbinic in nature? Cuz there's a
But part of that conversation always is
the rabbis always say on the one hand,
maybe you shouldn't say it again because
maybe it's rabbinic. On the other hand,
you see them saying, "It's such an
important bracha and if you didn't say
it and you don't say it now, you're
going to be missing out." So, we see
that already part of the halachic
conversation the rabbis are referencing,
"This is an important bracha." And this
is an important bracha that we need to
say and obviously it's not just about
saying it, but it's about understanding
and appreciating its messages and what
it can mean for us. I saw I think I saw
a question or a comment. Okay. So, let's
go now to the first major debate. The
first major debate is whether or not
birkot haTorah are de'oraita or
derabanan. Is saying birkot haTorah a a
commandment or or not? Now, at first
glance, you might say to me, "Wait,
Rabbi, we just saw a few Gemaras."
And the Gemaras seem pretty explicit.
The Gemaras seem to A, number one,
they seem to say min haTorah minayin,
which basically usually is a reference
to being biblical. Number two, what did
they compare birkot haTorah to?
What was the other bracha that they
referenced to? Birkot Amazon. BIRKOT
AMAZON IN TWO GEMARAS, THEY basically
equated Birkat Hatorah to Birkat Hamazon
and Birkat Hamazon as we know is the
only
uh agreed upon Birkat Bracha that is
Deoraita. But the fact that the Gemara
is putting it together would seem to
indicate that it should be Deoraita.
Right? Now, also just to explain this
a little bit more because I want to make
sure that we understand what we're
talking about here.
All other Brachot besides besides Birkat
Hatorah
and sorry, besides all the Brachot
besides Birkat Hamazon and according to
some Birkat Hatorah, everyone agrees
that those are Derabanan. Okay? So, for
example, if I do we we we've discussed
in the past that there are three three
main types of Brachot.
Generally three main types of Brachot.
One is called Birkat Nehenin, Brachot
that we that we say before we benefit
from something. So, for example, before
we eat food, we say a Bracha. Everyone
agrees that that is Derabanan. That is
only Rabbinic in nature. Okay? Then we
have what we call Birkat Shema U'virkat
Hoda'ah, Brachot of praise and thanks to
Hakadosh Baruchu. Okay? The only one
that's really Deoraita is is Birkat
Hamazon. Um all others are considered
Derabanan. And then we also have
something called Birkat Hamitzvah,
Brachot that we say before we do a
Mitzvah. Where even if I'm doing a
Mitzvah Deoraita, even if I'm doing a
Biblical Mitzvah, for example, I'm
sitting in the Sukkah. Everyone agrees
that sitting in the Sukkah is a Biblical
Mitzvah. Or shaking Lulav. Everyone
agrees Lulav is a Biblical Mitzvah.
Saying a Bracha beforehand is only
Derabanan in nature. It's only going to
be uh Rabbinic in nature. Even if I'm
doing a Biblical Mitzvah because Brachot
in general are considered to be
Derabanan. The question is, what about
Birkat Hatorah? Meaning,
learning Torah, is that a Biblical
Mitzvah?
Sure. Learning Torah is certainly a
Biblical Mitzvah. So, the question
becomes, might there be a separate
Mitzvah, not just to learn Torah, but to
also say a Bracha before I learn I I I
learn before I learned Torah. Okay?
Everyone understand that? That that's
that's the major question here. Now, why
is that relevant? Because
if you look at source number eight,
let's start let's start with the with
the Ram with the Ramban. Now, again,
remembering that how many mitzvot are
there in the Torah?
According to our tradition, 613.
Everyone agrees there's 613 mitzvot.
That is our tradition from Chazal. The
The challenge becomes in identifying
what are those 613 mitzvot, okay? Now,
there are a number of
Correct. And not all mitzvot are
applicable to everyone else. So, that's
also true. But, in terms of we can't
even agree on what are those 613
mitzvot. There are Gaonim and Rishonim
who are what called mone mitzvot. They
decided to take upon themselves to count
how many mitzvot there are. Rav Saadia
Gaon counts the 600 has a list of the
613 mitzvot. Famously, who's the one of
the people who has most famously counted
the mitzvot was the Rambam. The Rambam
counted and lists he has what's called
the Sefer Hamitzvot, where he goes
through each of the mitzvot. And
interestingly enough, his count is
different than Rav Saadia Gaon's count.
On the Rambam himself, you have the
Ramban, Nachmanides, who went through
the list that the Rambam has and
disagrees in a number of different
areas. He has a commentary on the
Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot, and he says,
"Here's where I agree, here's where I
disagree. Here's where the Rambam
counted a mitzvah and I think he's
wrong." And he And then he lists the
ones because obviously if he thinks the
Rambam is wrong, that means he has to
have other mitzvot that he's going to
put into the count. And then he lists
all the ones that he thinks the Rambam
left out. For example, just so we even
know, two two of the probably the most
famous machloket between the Rambam and
the Ramban
regarding mone mitzvot, one would be
what we've discussed is there a mitzvah
to daven, right? We discussed that in
the in the past. According to the
Rambam, there is a mitzvah to daven
every single day. According to the
Ramban, there is not necessarily a
mitzvah tefillah is an opportunity more
than an obligation. The Ramban does say
that if that during times of tza'ar,
there might be a mitzvah to do so, but
not he does not agree with the Rambam.
Another famous debate regarding the
Rambam and the Ramban is regarding the
mitzvah to live in Israel. Is there a Is
there a mitzvah or a commandment to live
in Israel? Ram The Ramban doesn't list
that in his 613 mitzvot, and the Ramban
takes him to task for it. He says, "How
could you say that? Look at all these
Look at all Look at all the different
sukkim." Now, the Rambam himself never
responded, so we don't know what the
Rambam thinks. And there's a big debate
amongst the meforshim trying to
understand well, what does the Rambam
not believe that there's a mitzvah, or
does the Rambam really believe that
there's a mitzvah, but for a technical
reason he didn't include it? There's a
lot of discussion, we're not going to
get into the detail. The same thing
happens here when it comes to birkot
haTorah. So, the Rambam does not list a
separate mitzvah to say birkot haTorah.
He lists the mitzvah of Talmud Torah,
but he does not list the mitzvah of
saying the brachah on birkot haTorah.
And the Ramban disagrees and says, "It
doesn't make sense. Look at the gemaras.
We have two gemaras. The gemaras say
clearly that there is a mitzvah." Look
at source number eight. Mitzvah tet vav.
This is what If you look here, the the
heading of source number eight, it's
hassagot le
haRamban le sefer haMitzvot. These are
This is the Ramban's addendum to the
Rambam, or or his questions on the
Rambam, shichchot asim. These are the
ones that he left out, the mitzvot asay
that the Rambam left out.
Mitzvah tet vav shenitztaveinu lehodot
shemo yisbarach bechol eis shenikra
baTorah. There is a mitzvah for us to
thank Hashem
anytime we're about to learn Torah, al
haTovah haGedolah she'asah lanu betito
baTorah eleinu vehodi'enu haMa'asim
haretzuyim lefanav shebahem ninchal
chayei Olam Haba. Says the Ramban, we
have a mitzvah not just to learn Torah,
but to thank Hashem for the privilege
and obligation to learn Torah, and to
thank him for giving us the Torah so
that we know what we need to do in order
to be able to achieve Olam Haba. That is
a separate commandment.
Just like we have a commandment to thank
Hashem after we eat, so too we have a
commandment to say a bracha before we
learn Torah. And if you're wondering as
I just kind of referenced the change,
why is it that when it comes to eating
the bracha is after
and when it's bracha when when we're
learning Torah the bracha is before
we'll get to that soon. The Sefer
Hinnuch has a beautiful suggestion.
Ah, okay. So okay that's a that's a good
suggestion that's good suggestion maybe
maybe because you're never satisfied
you're never finish. Okay, interesting.
Well the the Sefer Hinnuch has a
different suggestion but it said but
that's a beautiful idea.
It says and says the Ramban
the book of says explicitly where how do
I know that there's a bracha Torah from
the from the Torah?
And then the Ramban again we skipped
some of it I didn't I didn't bring you
the whole the whole text. The
Sefer
Torah
mitzvah as it says
he says it must be from all of our we
see clearly that there is a mitzvah to
say to say bracha Torah. The Ramban says
no mitzvah
now says the Ramban something else. He
says okay here's the thing you could say
sure there's a mitzvah to say the bracha
but we're not going to list it maybe
maybe for technical reasons the Ramban
didn't list it as its as its own
mitzvah. Maybe he includes the bracha
that you say before Torah together with
the act of learning Torah. That he says
you're supposed to say a bracha and
learn Torah that's all one mitzvah. SO
HE AGREES THAT
YOU SHOULD SAY the bracha but he doesn't
count it as its own mitzvah because he
considers it to be the same as learning
Torah. It's all one mitzvah. Says the
Ramban that can't be. Why? Doesn't make
sense. He says because we have other
examples where we do an act we do a
mitzvah, we also then say a certain text
and they're counted as two separate
mitzvahs. What are some examples? One
example is the mitzvah of bikurim. There
is a mitzvah for a person who has first
fruits to bring the bikurim. And there
is two mitzvahs. One is to bring the
bikurim, and then there's something
called mikra bikurim, where he comes and
he says that he says that he quotes the
pesukim that are referenced in the Torah
that a person is supposed to say as he
brings the bikurim. Another example,
says the Ramban, is Pesach night.
Be'ezrat Hashem, when the Beit Hamikdash
will will be rebuilt, we're all going to
bring the korban Pesach. And as we bring
the korban Pesach, there's also a
commandment, which we do nowadays,
called Sipur Yetziat Mitzrayim. We don't
just do the mitzvah we of bringing the
Pesach, we also have to tell the story.
AND THOSE ARE COUNTED AS TWO SEPARATE
MITZVAHS. There's the act and then
there's the text that you say together
with it. SO, SAYS THE RAMBAN, the same
thing is true of birkat haTorah and
learning Torah. They should be two
separate mitzvahs, counted as two
separate mitzvahs in 613 mitzvahs.
That's the conclusion of the Ramban.
As we know, the Rambam doesn't list it.
How do we understand the opinion of the
Rambam? So, this is a debate, as always,
this is the debate. If you look in
source number
uh source number nine,
source number nine, the Megillat Esther.
So, interestingly enough, the Megillat
Esther is a safer that was written I
have a wrote I wrote it here uh in the
16th century
and it was written as a not not sorry,
not Megillat Esther meaning the the
scroll of Megillat Esther. Megillat
Esther is a is a Sorry, let me clarify.
The Megillat Esther that we know in
Tanakh was written much earlier.
Megillat Esther is a safer that was
written by by by by an early Aharon that
was it's that he calls it the safer
Megillat Esther. And he writes and what
he does is he defends he it's a
commentary on the Ramban defending the
Rambam from all the questions that the
Ramban asked. Whenever the Ramban would
say, "Rambam, why didn't you list this
mitzvah? Or why didn't you list this
mitzvah?" And he And he asked all these
questions on him. The Ramban himself
never defended himself. So, the Megillat
Esther comes and says, "I'm going to
defend him and I'm going to respond."
And he And he basically you have this
debate going back and forth. You have
the Rambam writing his safer mitzvot.
You have the Ramban asking all of his
questions and disagreeing. Comes the
Megillat Esther and says, "I'm going to
defend the Rambam from all the questions
that the Ramban is asking." Here,
however, interestingly enough, what does
the Megillat Esther say?
And I And I haven't seen Again,
admittedly, I haven't seen that much,
but this is the first time I've seen
this in in the Megillat Esther. Says the
Says the Megillat Esther, "Nirali
kidivrei haRamban so kim." I think the
Ramban's right.
I have no explanation for the Rambam.
He says, "I don't understand why the
Rambam did not include the mitzvah of
birkot haTorah in the 613 mitzvot." Lo
yadaati lama lo mina aharav im lo hashiv
she mitzvah sham bazeh pasuk hu al
derech asmachta. He says, "If you're
going to say to me, 'What about those
Gemaras? The Gemara state explicitly min
haTorah minayin?'" He says the Rambam
must assume that it wasn't an actual
source. It was what's called an
asmachta. An asmachta means that the
Torah was like hinting to this mitzvah,
but it's not an actual source in the
Torah for for for the mitzvah of birkot
haTorah. That's the That's the Megillat
Esther. He's basically saying, "I don't
understand the Rambam. It seems clear
that it should be a mitzvah d'oraita,
but but the Rambam must assume that he
he must have read those Gemaras
differently." We'll We'll We'll We'll
just move a little bit fast because of
time. The Sha'agat Aryeh.
Sha'agat Aryeh. Um
not to be confused with Miftah Sha'agat
Sha'agat Aryeh. Okay, this is a safer,
not the Operation Roaring Lion from the
from the most recent uh war.
This is a safer that was written in the
in the in the 1700s.
Um and he also mentions the Rambam's
opinion that the Rambam left out the
mitzvah of birkot haTorah. And he says,
"I don't understand why. It seems pretty
clear that there should be a mitzvah. It
must be the Rambam understood those
Gemaras to be only what we call a
Smachta, that he didn't It wasn't an
actual source from the Torah. It was
just a hint to it from the Torah, and
therefore, saying Birkot HaTorah,
according to the Rambam, is only is only
derabbanan." But in source number 11,
the Orach Chaim disagrees. The Orach
Chaim says, "No, you guys You guys You
guys are making a mistake. Really, the
Rambam does believe it's a mitzvah
deoraita to say Birkot HaTorah. Then why
doesn't he list it?"
He doesn't list it because he counts it
as one mitzvah together with saying with
with with with learning Torah. It's It's
an issue of
what you consider what you count when it
comes to the count of the mitzvot. Look
at source number 11. "Will any as daity
ain okayn." "V'gam ha-ra" The underlined
part in source 11. "Gam ha-Rambam s'vir
aleishin ha-Torah." Even the Rambam
agrees that this mitzvah is really
midoraita. "May asha shever because the
Gemara says pretty clearly that it's
midoraita." "D'chein hu b'Yerushalmi
Rosh Perek Zayin Brakhot." The same
thing in Brakhot. "Ela d'svira
she'zehu chelek m'chelkei ha-mitzvah
d'limud Torah u'mitzvah achati." He
understood that saying the Bracha and
learning TORAH COUNT AS ONE MITZVAH.
They're both from the Torah, but they
count as one mitzvah, and that's why the
Rambam doesn't list it as as its own
mitzvah. That's the Shagas That's the
Orach Chaim.
So, just to summarize what we've seen so
far is we have a a seeming debate
between the Rambam and the Ramban
whether or not the mitzvah whether or
not the commandment to say Birkat
HaTorah before you learn Torah is a
biblical mitzvah or just rabbinic in
nature. Now, I asked the question
before, why is it that even if you
assume that it's deraita, why do we say
one before and one after? Why is it that
the Bracha we say Birkat HaTorah we say
before we learn Torah, and the Bracha of
Birkat Hamazon, when it comes to food,
we say after? So, look at source number
12. The Shefa Chinuch asks this
question. He also assumes that it's a
mitzvah deraita.
"V'hin V'hinyana zeh she'chiyavnu ha-El
Baruchu
>> The fact that
told us to make the
that that we say before and when it
comes to food we say after it
seems to me
When it comes to physical pleasure It's
very hard to ask somebody to thank you
for physical players pleasure that they
have not yet received.
The physical side of us when do we thank
somebody for the food? When do we thank
somebody for the physical pleasure that
we get? After we enjoyed it. Before we
enjoyed it if we haven't yet gotten THE
ENJOYMENT IT'S MUCH HARDER for us to
thank anybody or to think
and therefore I could say YOU KNOW WHAT
THE
WHEN IT COMES TO PHYSICAL PLEASURES
FIRST get the pleasure and then
afterwards I ask you to thank me. I'm
not going to require you to thank me
before you actually have the pleasure.
When it comes to spiritual types of
pleasures
When it comes to spiritual pleasures our
our intellect knows that this is going
to be pleasurable and therefore we're
more able to recognize and feel and
appreciate that pleasure before we
actually learn Torah and therefore it's
more appropriate for us to before we
learn Torah stop and think
for for for the Torah.
And that's why we do it. I I would
actually think I would like to suggest
again this is my own idea. I think
there's more to it. I think that perhaps
we can even say that part of what we're
doing when we do birkot haTorah is not
just thinking Hashem, but framing
our Torah learning. And as we're going
to see, connecting to what does it mean
when we say that those people didn't
didn't say birkot haTorah before they
and that's why the destruction happened.
It wasn't necessarily about not saying
the brachot, it was about how you
approach your limud Torah and what Torah
is meant to achieve and accomplish for
you. And perhaps that's the reason why
when we comes to Torah, we need to say
the bracha before because it's about
setting the tone for what this limud
Torah is meant to be for us. But we'll
But as Hashem we'll get to that. I want
to do one one other thing. We have 2
minutes. And that is the big major
question. I ask the question is is is is
is our birkot haTorah de'oraita or
de'rabbanan? Are they rabbinic and is
saying the bracha birkot haTorah
mide'oraita or is it biblical or is it
rabbinic? You might say to me, "Rabbi,
who cares?
What's the difference?
Aside from the fact that it's limud
Torah and we get to understand better,
but what does it really matter?
I'M I'M A JEW, I'M A GOOD JEW. Whether
it's rabbinic or it's biblical, I'll try
to do the mitzvah." The answer is
there's a big there's a one at least one
very important nafka mina, big practical
difference, whether this bracha is
mide'oraita or mide'rabbanan. And that
is, what do you do in a situation where
where you're not sure whether or not you
said the bracha.
I don't know if I said the bracha or
not.
Okay. Now, as a general rule, normally,
if you're not sure whether you said a
bracha, we have a rule. What's the rule?
The rule is safek brachot lehakel. If
I'm not sure whether I said a bracha or
not, then we're mekel cuz we don't want
to repeat Hashem's name in vain.
But that idea is based on the assumption
that brachot are de'rabbanan. Brachot in
general only mide'rabbanan. There is one
bracha that if you're not sure whether
you said it, you actually should repeat
it. And what bracha is that?
Birkat Hamazon because it's de'oraita.
Look at source number 13. Kol habrachot
im mistapek im berach im lav einam
mevarech lo bat'chila velo basof. All
other brachot, if you're not sure
whether you said them, you should you
should not make a bracha
except for Hamazon mipnei shehu
you should not make the bracha except
for
because it is
now what about
he doesn't mention here
so the
most assume that
seems to assume like the bomb
that
the rabbin and therefore he says you
shouldn't you shouldn't repeat it if
you're not sure whether you said
it in the morning you should says the
you shouldn't repeat it
the
over here again I'm going to summarize
for you quickly just because of time the
quotes
the fact that most
disagree with the
the
and many others actually believe that
is
and he actually suggests that you should
say that if you're not sure whether you
said it you actually should say
again
however he makes a few points very
interesting points number one he quotes
the
who says the following he says even
though you should repeat if you're not
if you don't if you're not sure whether
you said it so then you should repeat
but you shouldn't say all three
just say one
because when you say one of them that's
enough to be to me to
saying
if you had to only say one which one
should you say
I should why I should one because the we
saw said or at least
said that's the best of the three and
therefore he says if you have to say
even if you have to repeat you should
only but also there are a couple of
other solutions you can have if you're
not sure whether you said it if you're
not sure whether you said it
who did not yet say to her another
option to avoid having to say it again
is to is to listen to them say the
have in mind to fulfill the obligation
with them and to say amen
another option that's mentioned is as
we're going to we'll discuss this a
little bit more in the future is there
it let's say you haven't yet done it
many
that the
which is the second bracha of birkot
kriat shema, has the same theme or many
similar themes to birkot ha torah and
therefore you can have in mind when you
say ahava rabba, have in mind, if you're
not sure whether you said birkot ha
torah already, when you say ahava rabba
in shema by shema, you should have in
mind to be yotzei the mitzvah of of
birkot ha torah and and then you should
try to learn torah right after davening
so that you're learning torah right
after having said having said the
bracha. And the mishnah brurah says even
more, he says let's say you it's
afterwards and then you realize you're
not sure if you said it. Let's say
finished davening but you don't remember
if you said birkot ha torah. As long as
you said ahava rabba, even if you didn't
have it in mind at the time,
you it's still it's still can count
because you said ahava rabba and you
know you said it. Even if you didn't
have in mind it it's better to have in
mind I want to be yotzei the mitzvah
when saying ahava rabba but even if you
didn't b'di'eved, you you you fulfilled
the mitzvah you don't need to repeat
birkot kriat shema. One other solution
the orach chaim mentions says if it's a
leining day, then what you could do
is to get an aliyah.
Because if you get an aliyah, we talked
we said before that the bracha before
before the before the aliyah is
d'rabbanan according to everybody but if
you're not sure whether you said the
bracha or not, if you get an aliyah,
then you're certainly going to say the
bracha and at least then you'll be
yotzei you'll be yotzei your obligation
to to say the bracha. Okay, we did
>> Can you give an aliyah to someone who
isn't even sure whether
No, you can you can give it you can.
Meaning everyone agrees you should say
you should say the bracha when they cuz
everyone agrees when they get the aliyah
they should say the bracha.
Uh so therefore they're saying the
bracha before they get the aliyah that
for sure. So okay, we we did a lot here
and because of time I'm not going to
summarize. Um b'ezrat Hashem, next time
we'll we'll continue in our in our study
there's a lot more to talk about birkot
ha torah, a lot of fascinating
conversations and debates regarding
birkot ha torah. Um so b'ezrat Hashem
we'll do that uh next week.