Others Say

Because of this mice try to cut her hair, but nothing would become of Shimon Rem. And Rem Mayor would become a hair. So, we know Rem Mayor is a hair. Question is why? Why is Rem Mayor referred to as a hair? So, hair, it's partial, right? Someone asked you a question today, it's your lucky day because tomorrow is Shimon Rem. The Gamorah says that the canas that was given to Rem Mayor and Rem Nassan when they were allowed back at the base madras that we wouldn't say over time in your name. Okay, so we're not going to say over time in your name, so what are we going to say? Rem Nassan would be a Shimon Rem and Rem Mayor would be known as a hair. We also know that Tosis says in Sota that the base madras doesn't like this so much, but he brings such a mahaluk that the Rishonim said and that is that whenever Rem Mayor is quoted in Shas as a hair, it's Torah that he said over in the name of his Rebbi Acher. It's a play on words because we know that Rem Mayor learned Torah from many Rebbeim. His Rebbi Muvik was Rebbi Akiva, but he also had a Rebbi Muvik Acher. He learned by Rebbi Shimon, right? We've spoken about the Rebbeim of Rem Mayor over the years, but he learned Torah by Acher, Elisha ben Avuya. And it's for that reason that sometimes Rem Mayor is referred to as a hair. It's when he's saying over Torah not from Rebbi Akiva and not from Rebbi Shimon. It's when he's saying over Torah from his Rebbi Acher in Sima L'dover. Acher, Acher, right? It's partial. And that's this Indian over here of a hair. The truth is in the Gamorah it's even a little bit mashma that way because when Rebbi says over from Acher, so what does Rebbi Shimon say? Me him how over, right? We're talking about the partial the word Acher is partial, but the truth is there's a pun intended over here. It is a lashon hara. Because it's Rem Mayor ben Shimon Elisha ben Avuya. It's it's a Rebbi Talmid. There's two over here. Now, a minyan that only counts as one, but the bottom line is right to take us back to the Sanhedrin Torah. But, the bottom line is there's a hair. There is a rabbinic component over here. It's when Rem Mayor is saying over Torah in the name of Elisha ben Avuya. Now, at first glance it's a pelladigatusis because it's mashma like in this Gamorah. The Gamorah gives us a different reason. The Gamorah says the reason he is called Acher is based on the fact it's based on the fact that they want Rem Shimon ben Gamaliel wanted to punish him because of this mice to show you. Now, the truth is that if you think of that inside your madras and you to this right here could be in the class what was in the class right nothing would become and what would become of would be could be a little play on words that you're a of you're a of and the truth is it wasn't so even by and maybe the saw a little over here they gave him a class they felt that he didn't behave properly but even afterwards he didn't want to ask they saw something and maybe in the of we have to to that inside your could be it is a intended it is somewhat related to the fact that is a first class is very based on the over here but it could be it's a little bit that's just one the other thing is as you see over here that Rebbe was almost at a point he was almost at a point where it was hard for him to say Rebbe he would say even at the end even at the end what did he say right at the very very he said that we should but to say that was something that he was absolutely not comfortable saying we want that it's that in the in on Hanukkah it's brought down the shame going to the so if it's the love of love that we know that the of Hanukkah is not mentioned in the now the concept of Hanukkah gets a shout out to the comments it's a this is again this matter of this right now but the bottom line is that the of Hanukkah as a for example and even the it's all in but there is no Hanukkah the so if he said this is the he said because who wrote the of he wrote the and we know came from space right the says the of it mahapach b'sichusa d'David. But we know that Rebbi came from Malchus Beis David. And we know that the Chanukah miracle came through the Chashmonaim. And the Chashmonaim, when they performed the miracle, they became the melachim they became the kings during Bayis Sheini. Now, really the Malchus was supposed to belong to which shevet? To shevet Yehudah, right? Lo yasur shevet mi'Yehudah um'chokeik mibein raglav. And the the Chashmonaim were Kohanim came from shevet Levi. And we know from Bayis Sheini parshas Vayechi that says that they were over lo yasur shevet mi'Yehudah. And that's why the Gemara says in Bava Basra daf chof gimel that any person that says mi'Beis Chashmonaim are not We know that really he's an eved. That's why they were all wiped out. It was because they were over on this lav, they were over on on what the Zayde Yaakov Avinu said "Lo yasur shevet mi'Yehudah." Ramban that lo yasur shevet mi'Yehudah um'chokeik mibein raglav. But the bottom line is that says the Tamim u'Minhagim b'shem Maran Chasam Sofer that Chasam Sofer said that because Rebbi Yehudah Nasi was Asim mi'David, it bothered him. It bothered him that the Chashmonaim, who are the ones that made the Chanukah story happen, took away the Malchus from his family. And it's because of that hergeish that he had that he did not write the story of Chanukah in his chibur. Now, the way they bring it is is as follows. V'zeh he'er Rebbi Yehudah HaKadosh. I'm reading from the Tamim u'Minhagim. This is something that bothered Rebbi Yehudah HaKadosh who because mi'Chaim HaMishnah Avir Ruach HaKodesh and Rebbi Yehudah Nasi wrote mi'Chaim Avir Ruach HaKodesh nishmas tanes mi'chibura. The Bavli What do you mean it was written b'Ruach HaKodesh? So what's going on over here? So kilo nishmas tanes mi'chibura because of the he'er Rebbi Yehudah HaKadosh. So you have to learn up this inyan here a little bit better. But I always thought that this Gemara is a little bit of a tzushtel. It's a little bit of a tzushtel because you see the kpeida that Rebbi Yehudah Nasi had mamash for this inyan. You're taking away the Nesi'us from my father, from our inyan, right? "Oy li tam u'charuv es on netzach." That's what he felt. And Rebbi Yehudah Nasi was using that we'er when he's saying over Torah. That's mamash where he's saying it It's when he's saying over it. It's what he's saying in this Indian. You know what's interesting because we know who our mayor is. So who is he almost get a sense maybe after learning this is what he mentioned our mayor's name. I mean you see that's what's going on. There's so much to think about on this Indian.