Noach 5786

So I want to welcome everybody back to the new uh cycle of para shash shàua. Um because of yontiff I we missed say for paras's braces but we'll start this here with parasy the says there's an interesting difference between the kosher animals that came that were brought to the TVA and the non-cooser animals. So it says over here which means these are non-cooser not necessarily kosher animals. These animals the the pairs of non-cooser animals or whatever they may be they came on their own. But when it came to the kosher animals there the pik says that no has to go ahead and to fet to fetch them. So the ramban points this out on this of that says that pairs would come on their own. It wasn't necessary for Noah Noah to go ahead and to catch them etc etc. So that is when it came to the non kosher animals they came on their own but in terms of the kosher animals no had to go ahead and to catch them. So why why is that? So the so Rabian Kamki in his safe Yakov wants to suggest that when it came to the kosher animals which were brought for corbonus so you don't you no have to do some effort which means when it comes to doing a mitzvah performing a mitzvah it doesn't it should not come just easily you know you sit back and they come on their own, you have to go out and take fetch them. Why? Because a mitzvah requires input, labor, your own not neesh, but certainly your effort. Something that comes, you know, just on its own, that's not that's not a that's not a perfect mitzvah. Matter of fact, there's a similar concept that uh it's an interesting phenomena. We all know that when a person gets an aliyah the minute in in many sh says you make a mishab and they say etc etc. Why is that? Who came up with this idea of a mishab and so they should donate x amount of money whatever it is to the shul whatever it may be. Who came up with that concept? The truth of the matter is it's based on a zar. This is a mystical concept. The zire says that a mitzvah that comes easily without any effort has kipace attached to it. Kipus literally means uh shells or or peelings or you know so I don't exactly how to define kipus. It's a cabalistic concept but the point is that it's it's not perfect. It's uh it's it's like maybe not damaged but not perfect. And therefore you got nali very good. You didn't do anything to get nali. They called you up and therefore to go ahead and to to make it that no this mitzvah came with some effort. That's why they inst the concept of Mishra. Be that as it may, this is what Byan says that the reason Nyak had to go ahead and get the kosher animals because since they were going to be used as corbonis therefore nay had to make some kind of effort as opposed to the non-coo kosher animals which weren't used though then they could come on their own. However, the Ramban himself says a different explanation to this. And the Ramban says the non-coosher animals that came to the TA they were coming there for their self-preservation that the that this men the the the species of elephant or or or hippomotuses or whatever it may lions they're they're coming to the table to to to to maintain the men the the species whether it's elephants, whether it's sharks, whether it's uh whatever it may be, whether it's uh mosquitoes. So you're going this you're doing this for your own good, for your own benefit. Therefore, you come on your own. But I will of but the kosher animals some of which or some of some of which would be sacrificed. The reban is not going to make an animal come instinctively for its own demise. It's not fair. It's not right. which means you're you're have an instinct to come to the table. Why? To be slaughtered to be a corban. That's not right. That's not Yoshar. And therefore, that is why Nyak had to go ahead and fetch them. They wouldn't come on their own because it would not be fair or just to them. Which leads Azra Bisai to another important point which is really fundamental to safer braces. the nitiv and his classic parish on of Hemikir in the to save braces writes something very very important and it's worthwhile to see that preface to save her braces the n points out that safer braces is called safer hayoshar as the gummor says in a zora ho for the specifically s paraser braces called safer hayashar let's see goes on why is it called safer hayashar so then it says is because safer braces is the story of a yank and their descendants ai and besides being sadikim etc etc they were yes they were straight they were honest even the non-Jews appreciate that they were good people they were yes and part of the lesson of safer is to teach us what's yash to do what's right not necessarily what's advantageous not what is good for you what is Yoshure. It's the right thing to do. And therefore, the Rambana is saying this point over here. It's not right to have the animals come to be slaughtered. So what? Oh, okay. Who cares? Let's go slaughter anyway. It's not Yoshar. It's not right. The terror wouldn't do that because the terror and say for bracious beat is all about the who were says the that go didn't admire is because he put on fillain or because he kept everything including every every respected him because he was honest he was straight his word was his word that's the way it goes with all of the office and that's what safer bases is about. It's called the safer because it's the story of the and the teaches us right here in parases no the reason the animals that were slaughtered didn't come on their own because it's not yoshar and it's not right and the rebish doesn't do something that's not yoshar