0:00 / 0:00
Modern Masters: Kohanim | Rabbi Sam Shor | November 27th 2025
43 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:
Torah
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay. So, good morning.
So last week we spoke a little bit about
Kaneka because we were Arabisl
and we spoke about how durab Mosha
Wilson and Rook both talk about how
during this period of Kaneka every
single one of us so to speak becomes a
cohain right there we're all because
collectively the Jewish people are
called
a priestly nation so that with with that
as our backdrop today I want to do
something completely different than what
we ordinarily do in the modern masters
course. And instead of looking at at
modern masters of Jewish law, we're
going to actually deal with some modern
shuvos. Okay? Some some modern response
to literature related specifically to
the questions uh surrounding kahuna, the
status of who is a coin today and what
happens if a person is a coin today but
wasn't always religious. And then he
finds out the implications that he's now
a cohane
or that he's now religious that that
kahuna status has an implication for his
personal relationships for his conduct
etc etc and we're going to start with
this with this article that appeared in
our sha almost 5 years ago and it's
we'll just read it quickly a young man
from Ben recently paid a visit to the
religious council in Tel Aviv in order
to verify the name of his grandfather
and to his shock discovered that his
father and grandfather had apparently
both been kanim.
Ordinarily, this would would have been
relevant but untroubling information. In
this particular case, however, the young
man was already married to divorce and
according to Jewish law, Kohanima
forbidden to marry the divorcees. The
discrepancy had apparently occurred
because the father of the young man had
originally recorded on his marriage
certificate that he was a Israel and not
a Cohen. and but at some at some later
stage the entry had been crossed out and
replaced with a with coin. So they took
the form and not not filled it out again
but put an X through it and wrote Coen
next to it. Okay. The young man and his
wife then turned to the renowned expert
in Jewish law
who told them to separate for the
meantime until their status could be
ascertained.
The story then found its way to the ears
of Rabbi Noam Amra head
which deals primarily with marriage
related issues. Rabbi Amram immediately
realized how important it was to find a
way to permit the couple who have six
children to remain married and he
researched the issue and formulated a
solution. What Rabbi Amram discovered
was that the young man's father who had
been completely secular had not bothered
to clarify his own lineage either for
his own edification or for the purpose
of informing his children that they
might be kim. He also investigated the
question according to the conclusions of
four rishim rashi rautam and the raan.
Based on the above, Rabbi Amram ruled
that in accordance with three of the
four above mentioned rishonim that the
government document did not constitute
evidence and it could not be used to
prove that the man or his father or
grandfather were definitively kanim.
Rabbi Amram also noted that even in the
opinion of the fourth postake, the
document did not constitute evidence as
it had been written and then crossed out
and rewritten. In addition, there was
only one signature attesting the coin
status, not the two Adam required by
Jewish law. He also noted that there
exists some doubt as to whether people
generally consider to be kahan today
really are kanim
as definitive records have often not
been kept. Therefore, Rabbi Amram ruled
that the young man could return to his
family. Okay. So what I want to do today
we're there there are similar numerous
similar which you wrote that have been
addressed to the
b okay
over the years and they've been
published in in a in a volume of from
and literally people turn to from all
over the world with these kinds of
questions and we're just going to learn
a few of these chuvot that have been
posted them from all over the world
together this morning. So if you take
turn to page one on the packet
here's the first shila comes from Kali
Colia the first shila okay
is living with a nonjew
he's not religiously observant
is he allowed to give up his status as a
in order that the woman could convert
they then therefore get married up.
Okay. Is some in such a circumstance is
a person allowed to encourage his the
woman he's he's in a relationship with
to convert in order that they could get
married if he's willing to what? Give up
his status as a cohen. Is that allowed?
So that's the Shila. Now they're going
to ask the Shil in greater detail
in our city
where there's a Jew who lives here who
has who has the being a
and he's married to this non-Jewish
woman according to secular law.
The person really would like his wife to
what? To convert. who [clears throat]
he's not currently observant
from what we can ascertain it seems what
that his father before him who obviously
would be the person he would inherit the
the cohen status from was not was also
not particular about mitzvah
my question is
is there a way to clarify whether maybe
he's not really a I He's not he himself
is not Roy to be a coin
and and to also maybe question
disqualify his status as a cohane in
order that what he could in the end he
could marry we could permit him to marry
this woman after she converts.
Okay. Could I? He says, can we rely on a
famous which we're going to look at in
greater detail in a few moments. Okay.
And can we rely on that?
Or is it am I required the the rabbi the
local rabbi on the ground is asking or
am I required to inform them that
there's no hope
that I'm not able to help them?
How shall I what conduct myself? He
asked. Okay.
So here's the answer. They gave two a
two-part answer. If you take a look
according to the laws of Torah
because of the status of whether you're
considered a cohenically or not, you
maintain being a even if what you
transgress and do many many
extreme transgressions.
if his father
who married a divorce or a but
then that then he meaning he is not
really a he's what's called a meaning
he's he's considered he's considered
from
and therefore he would be what not
considered if in other words if we could
prove that his mother. Okay, again,
right now his entire status of being a
Cohen is based on the fact that his
father before him said he was a Cohen.
But if his father also wasn't from and
we could prove that his father married a
woman that was not permissible to him as
a Cohen, then what? Then he would then
he's not a Cohen. And therefore we could
therefore we could allow him to to to
marry
to
marry this convert.
move on.
But since we don't know this,
therefore what we have to accept the
reality of the situation which is right
now his reality is what? That he's a
coen. It's not and he's not allowed to
marry this woman. Okay. So that's the
first the first child. Now we're going
to go we're going to go across the
Atlantic Ocean to Roma Italy to Rome.
And this the the backdrop of this child
is
shalush. A coain who married a woman who
must have been either adopted or soon
after after she was born was converted
as a yald. Okay. As a infant.
Okay. What? What's the status of their
marriage? Mau what's his status as a
cohenim?
and the stats of their children as and
that's the context of the question now
here's the question itself
the question is asked
okay she was a she was an infant okay he
married her though what as she grew up
and um accord according to okay
and he gave her Akua in front of two
Aiden. Okay. And they were and and their
wedding was officiated by by an ordained
rabbi.
Okay. And I think in this case, ordained
rabbi means similarly someone who had an
orthodoxically
umly
um or coordination. Okay. Number one,
is it permissible to call him up as a
co? He's already married to this woman.
Bet.
Am I required to prevent him from going
up to
Are we Do we have to tell him he should
not serve as a coim to what? For the
Okay,
I just did that. And what's the status
of their children?
Are they considerly considered from a
status or a rabbitic status?
And what's their, you know, what are
they entitled to in terms of the you
know and and obligations? Are they not?
What's their status? Okay.
what's the
just so the the the the
going to answer this question should
know
wrote there are more details it's not
such a simple case so here here are the
more details okay
he the
he met her what this the the co-ain the
young man who's a co-en this woman in
the local Jewish youth groups okay and
assumed that what he knows her his whole
sister kids he assumed she was Jewish
because she was a footprint which she
was Jewish but didn't think to ask that
there might be uh might be an
extenduating circumstance in terms of
heric status
mat
He was always particular what in the
past that he only dated Jewish women. He
was always careful. Okay. Again this is
not here in Israel. This is in Italy. So
all right the second the second point
for clarification
when he met this
young woman
he he asked were you are you have you
always been Jewish? have you been Jewish
since your birth? And she answered that
she has been Jewish since she was born
because what? She was she was converted
immediately after her her her birth.
Meaning she was either born born to a
non-Jewish woman or or woman who was not
yet hakally Jewish and then uh right
after she gave birth the baby converted
or maybe the two of them converted. We
don't know all the full details yet. or
she was adopted and and immediately uh
taken by this family and immediately
converted.
She's always thought of herself as a
Jew. So there's never any suffic
she spoke from a from the depths of her
heart. She wasn't lying. Okay? Since as
long as she's been alive, she's been a
Jew. All right. Three.
When the when the husband met the mother
of the of the his bride,
he thought she's always been Jewish
also. Again, he doesn't know her status.
She always came was involved in the
community and she even came to so I
don't know again we don't know if the
mother never converted or if the mother
also converted eventually but this young
man always saw that what the mother was
also part of the kil I didn't think that
it would be a that he has to question
her status okay four
and after the the man became aware of
the status of his wife
Kama Italia.
He turned to many rabbis here in Italy
to ask them what is there any way to
permit them to get married
according to
Shalom Italia.
And since he wasn't able to find a
single rabbi in Italy that would allow
them to get married, he went to France.
Mikublim
and he found a a rabbi in France who
even though he knew that she was
converted he he accepted them and he did
the
they even wrote the kassa correctly and
said what that she's a guillorit the
daughter of au okay
>> well he I thought he was married to her
already then he that that you converted.
>> He did. No. No. So, no. This is not that
that's not the circumstance. This is
this is he they're giving you the the
whole circumstance the backstory. Okay.
>> He married her knowing.
>> Correct. Correct. He married her knowing
this.
Okay. This Cohen has all in the past
always been called up to the Coen
Aaliyah
and he continues to in the community
where his wife grew up
and also one of the others in Rome
before they got married. This was
traditional
and now we have to say what that since
they got married this couple became in
their own house more careful to keep
mitzvah. Okay. So what do you do? On one
hand it's a real problem. On the other
hand you could blow up a a family and a
family that seems to be growing in
Yiddish kite. So what's the answer?
Okay. So here we go. Now it begins by
saying what here's the beginning of the
chuva
even it's prohibited for a coh to be
married to a non-Jew to to guar sorry to
a convert even if she converted when she
was an infant
if they he did marry her then what do
you have to tell them to do? They need
to what? get divorced
with the with all the challenges. But
the chuva continues that's the
introduction. But
however,
first you have to clarify
Hebrew if the status of the family of
the husband as
crystal clear. Okay. Is it certain that
they're a family of
If it's true that they can establish
that without without a doubt that the
family are and that that status is
confirmed by people that are shorit
okay that can give us that are kosher to
give us then what then he has to get
divorced okay a vow but Dam answer
if it's not really crystal clear.
Even if it's a question mark, okay? Even
if it's a some question mark,
he's not required to divorce her.
And if that's if they stay married, he
has to what? cease behaving like a coin
is
and from this point forward he becomes a
a in every way shape and form and if
that's the case if he does that then
what I don't think it affects the status
of
of of the children if they can clarify
that what that that that he was not
really a coain then um then they can
stay married
and that doesn't have any impact on the
on the status of the children meaning
they would also be Israeli
but if his status as a coin is certain
as long as he doesn't divorce his wife
you can't allow him to continue to to
You have to communicate that to them
sensitively and and sweetly.
Okay. He meaning that he has no status
of what? Of a create.
You don't give him any special status as
a cohen
but rather you consider him like what
all other
now comes the challenging part
and there for the same reason what you
should prevent him if he remains married
to this to this garis from what
serving as a co-en
for the
okay
you should find another that is not
calling his status as a coin into
problematic territory when we call and
despite this
if he's already served as a coin for pon
the pon is still kosher meaning you
don't have to tell the kid that it was
the family that the because the coin
wasn't really what was a problematic
cohane that now you have to go back and
redeem the kid again. No, it's it's it's
okay. Shainu co because what? He is a
Cohen. Okay. His only puzzle to function
as a co now because why? Because his
status of being a cohen has been
clarified and he's married to a woman
that user him to be married to. And
until he divorces her, he cannot
function ritualistically as a cohen. But
his status is what? That of a coin.
Okay. Now he says,
He says, "According to the Torah, a
woman a guaris is not permissible to be
married to a coen." Okay? Even if she
did so as an infant and okay and and she
therefore is not permitted.
Therefore, all their children have to be
considered which means they're
disqualified. Okay? They do not fall
into the category at all.
Whether it be to go up to to
Aliaten to be called to the Torah
or to redeem the firstborn ch but that's
now now comes a more difficult part
even the daughters.
Since the daughters are also
okay, they're not allowed to marry
meaning,
okay, and and therefore their status is
more is more limited than even a
regular, you know, a regular Israelite
because they are the result of a
prohibited relationship. They are not
allowed to marry Kohan. Okay.
And what about what about the the
grandchildren
the children of the sons? Okay. They are
still consider they the next generation
they're still considered
meaning that they still are not regular
Israelites and they're not they're not
conning. Okay.
Because even they marry a kosher Jew
that's permissible to them, it doesn't
change that their status in terms of
rectifying their status of having come
into the world through a an an
unpermissible relationship. The
know but what about the children of the
the grandchildren through the daughters?
If again the daughters follow the rules
and married regular
is not
then their children are considered
full-fledged is they're notal
because why? Because the status of
whether you're a cohen or a ley or or
isite that comes through the fathers not
through the mothers. Okay. So the
daughters cannot marry kohanim. The
grandchildren to the sons remain kalalim
because the fathers were kalalim. The
grandchildren of the daughters are you
because the father were was Yeah.
>> question
Re was who does the bon
>> I thought I heard that if someone was
adopted
before certain and becomes a a g a gear
before a certain age considered
full-fledged Jew. It
>> is considered fullfledged Jew but not
for marriage of kahuna. That's that's
what he's saying. And that's in the
covenant. That's why that's why they
asked that question even as an infant.
Okay. That
>> okay. So it's a it's it's part of the
challenge the challenging status of of
the kahuna. Okay. Now
>> what happens here in Israel? We don't
have a problem.
>> We do. We just saw a story. We just saw
a story. This this case is right here in
Israel.
>> What happens in the United States? We
have so
>> we're gonna get to the United States in
a minute. There's a shot. There's a
tumor from the United States in a
minute. Okay. So, first before we get to
the United States, we're going to see
another short one from Zurich Zurich,
Switzerland. Okay. Hey, someone who's
adopted even after age someone who's
adopted even after age three and have a
and they convert also consider
>> correct but meaning if you're
ga which is a whole different suga which
we're not going to get into which is a
rabbi has been talking about is there
are various in terms of what's expected
of of a of a of a child that's being
adopted versus a someone who's closer to
Gil Mitsos that are being adopted in
terms
A child is at the mercy of their
parents. Meaning their child can't all
of a sudden start eating if his parents
don't keep in the house. Okay. So so the
expectations in are are much more
lenient towards according to many post
maybe not all in terms of a family that
wants to adopt a child versus uh uh
someone who becomes a a convert later
closer to the age of Gilmit or after
Gilitud. Okay. Okay. Okay. So, let's
just go back to um the this is this this
one comes from Zurich Zur Switzerland
a Coen who was married to a woman okay
who before that had been intimate with a
nonjew.
We have sitting amongst us in our
community a young woman who became a
but at one point she was married to a
nonjew
and they got divorced according to
secular law
and she has a child from that first
marriage. Okay.
My question is,
is there any any way to permit her to
get engaged to marry a and so says the
okay we don't know by the way the status
here whether she's already in a
relationship with someone as a cohen or
whether the now that she's become a
balachua the the local community is
trying to set her up with someone. We
don't know the backstory. It doesn't go
into that much detail, but the Dian
answer very plainly here that there's no
sad to permiss it. Now, now we're going
to get to a more a longer more evolved
case that comes from the United States,
comes from New York. Okay.
What is the status of a Cohen whose wife
had been in a relationship an intimate
relationship with a non-Jew in her youth
and and also in terms of his status of
is already questionable and weak
as based on the fact the only one who
told him and can attest to him that he
is a Cohen is was his father who himself
wasn't not only wasn't from but was this
rejected Judaism okay wasn't committed
at all so here's the shila okay
there's a in my community there's a
couple that came before me okay this is
the rabbi of that community turning to
the
ben they're 28 years years old
that did chuva about a year and a half
ago they started doing chuva
after they had already been married
this young man told me he's a coin
he told me that his wife
he told me that when his wife was 18
years old
he was married she was married to a
nonju for a short period of time just
two months.
He knew this before he married her.
But again, he wasn't knowledgeable and
didn't know there was not permissible
for him as a cohen to marry a woman in a
c of that circumstance.
My question is how does he know that
he's a Cohen? Okay. When I No, sorry.
When I asked him how he knows the coin,
he said his father answered him that he
was one.
But this is no real legitimate proof.
Why?
There's no proof from any other person
because all the other close relatives
either died or they're not connected to
them at all. There's no extended family
to confirm the status.
The father is not from
he even eats on. God forbid. Okay.
And that man who used to eat on what? He
passed away before this man came to live
in this young man came to live in our
community.
Okay. Before he was born.
>> So the grandfather right before he was
born the grandfather of of the father of
this man. Okay. Okay. Okay. Passed away.
And on his says,
"This man's father," when I asked him,
"How does he know he's a co?" He says,
"Because my father told me he's a
his grandfather, this young man came to
he didn't think you kosher." Okay. Okay.
So, he might have come to
Okay. But he didn't keep he wasn't he
wasn't from
he said when I spoke to the father he
said what I never heard when I asked him
did you ever go to as a he didn't know
he didn't even know what that was. Okay.
the man who who's living in my community
says even though he wasn't religious
he always felt that he has a obligation
towards Judaism because he knew that he
was a made him a leader so to speak uh
on some level
that now he's coming to me and saying
what what do I do what's my status
This couple has two young daughters,
meaning they became from a year and a
half ago, but they've obviously been
married for a number of years. They have
two young daughters.
Obviously, as they become now more
knowledgeable from, they're very very
concerned about the the circumstances
they find themselves in.
Obviously
is a very very pressing and trying
extenduating circumstance and and and
situation
in order to save the life of this
family.
Okay. Is it permissible to rely on the
famous that
wrote
If the person doesn't have anyone who's
from who can attest to what his status
as a okay that can give a prop
acceptable aid to his status as a cohen
then we then what in such circumstances
we can we can say he's not really a
cohen that's the famous which by the way
you can see in the footnotes on the side
you can see where that comes from but
okay
So, right back. So, let's go back to
Chuva. Um,
there's one more important point I need
to I need to share with the Dianim.
I just met this couple [clears throat]
a month ago.
They're just beginning their journey,
okay, to learn more and more about
keeping mitzvah.
I have no idea if it's going to have a
negative impact on their commitment and
their trajectory in terms of their
commitment to Jewish life. If I tell
them what that they have to get
divorced,
They only we only came to be aware of
this because what in in sch smoozing
with another woman in the community she
told the the the woman the the the wife
in this case told another woman in the
community her life story and when this
detail became revealed that woman you
know very kindly said you know it's
important that you go speak to the rabbi
about this about this circumstance
And that therefore at this time I'm
turning to you the
guidance in this difficult circumstance.
Is it permissible for me to rely on the
Hector of Mosha Feinstein? Okay. And
tell him he's not really a Cohen. And
therefore it's permissal for him to stay
with his wife
and if that's true is he really become a
Israel in every way sension of the form
that he can go to funerals he doesn't
have to he's no longer a co in any way
shape or form what's his status okay so
here's the answer Okay.
Okay.
Telephone key. And after we have the
clarification on the telephone that that
uh from you that um what that what shall
oa that it's only the father of the
person asking the shila who can attest
to the fact that he is a cohen that
their stat their family are kohanim
said that a father didn't come to
never was called to the Torah as a coin.
He never went to
he always conducted himself as someone
who completely rejects Yadis.
Even his grandfather, okay, never went
up to the Torah as a never never, okay,
the the the fact what's written on the
on the grandfather is what based on the
instructions of the father of this young
man.
Okay. based on everything that we were
was outlined in your question and based
on the clarifications that we shared
above that you communicated when we
spoke
Sha Mosha Feinstein Mosha Abenezar okay
okay and he says we it appears to us
that what you absolutely in this case
can re rely on the the leniency of Mosha
Feinstein the famous soccer
brought in the igros Moshe and allow
allow this couple to continue to be
together that he does not really have a
a full-fledged Khazaka as being a co-en
and therefore we should not we do not
have to blow up this family and rather
we can encourage this family to continue
to grow and continue to seek holiness.
Now just to bring this all together, we
we began first of all a very interesting
child as a Jewish when we began by
saying that one of the reason why we
talked about Kahuna this week is because
last week we talked about Kaneka and how
during Khan we all become Kanim. So one
of the one of the interesting things
here is that in the last cha what was
one of the what was one of the
determining factors in terms of why they
could rely on the kula
because this family is re-engaging
collectively to become baluva. They're
going up in sanctity maodes
as we know which is really what khanaka
is truly all about. So I thought this is
just an interesting set of chuas and
something different a little bit
different to do this morning. We'll be
back with Masters of Jewish Thought next
week, but I just thought I saw this in
my files this obviously I've given this
year in the past, but I saw this this
week. I thought this might be something
a little bit of a different twist to do
and I see from the faces that people
enjoyed it and uh it was a pleasure
learning together this morning. content.
It's Shabas.