Missionary Attacks Rabbi Singer on Sin and Atonement — Gets Exposed

Daniel a blessed memory. He didn't bring sacrifice on Kipur. What did he do? Please missionaries, I asked the Vatican to step forward and explain how did one of the people who you the Vatican consider a saint? You at Dallas Theological Seminary call him a saint. How did he do it? There was no offerings. There was no sacrifices. This is all silly. Does it say Calvary? No. Does it say the blood of the unblenmished lamb? No. Does it say Galgtha? No. Does it say the cross? No. Say God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son. No. This short of video is well making claims about the Hebrew Bible, about sin and atonement. We wouldn't show it to you unless it was something that really we hear repeatedly from missionaries seeking to convert Jews to Christianity. >> Torah says in Leviticus 16 that the blood sacrifice of Yom Kipur, the Sabbath of Sabbaths, is the only God orained method of atonement for all the sins of the people. Not prayer, not fasting, not good deeds. And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year. There comes a long Tovia singer teaching that atonement can be achieved without blood through prayer, repentance, and charity instead. >> You know, it's interesting that most people would be embarrassed to just lie and make up things that aren't there. I mean, I think I would like you just have a fear of getting caught, but apparently these people have no fear of just making up verses that don't exist or conflating two separate passages into one as though they're the same, and they're not. So, there's no passage that says what this missionary insists it says. There's nothing like it, but he's smashing together two passages. And I think just a point Ni made before we look at the most important chapter in the Torah that discusses Yam Kipur. Leviticus 16, the beginning of the chapter opens up with sacrifice. The first sacrifices are brought by the priests and the priests will bring a katas. Whenever you hear the term katas, that word really means to miss. And what it conveys with regard to offerings is unintentional sins. Just so you know this, the priests are given a mandate to guard the sanctity of the sanctuary. It's their responsibility. They bear it. It's in the Torah. Therefore, they have to bring offerings because invariably people get things through TSA. It's like La Hava going into an airport. TSA in the United States is responsible for keeping the other side of you know the security check sterile right so the kohanim are kind of in charge of keeping the bas mikdash sterile means free of anyone who's contaminated invariably mistakes are made they bring this offering now what happens we have a series of offerings we're going to speak about but when the Torah talks about that this is an eternal covenant, an eternal practice. It's a statute you must keep forever. We don't see that until Leviticus 16:29. This is all smoke and mirrors. The first time you find forever that this is an eternal covenant or an eternal commandment is verse 29. That's the break. And this will be to you an eternal statue to you. You shall afflict. It literally says, "And you shall afflict your soul." Meaning, and what do we do? Those that breaks down to five parts. Meaning, we don't eat, we don't drink, we don't engage in marital relations, we don't bathe, and so on. And we don't anoint ourselves. So there are we let's just take not eat. And in case you think should calm down in case you think the rabbis invented it, the fasting on kipur is actually brought up in Tanakh in other places. So you see this is not going to be the topic of this discussion the oral Torah in Isaiah 58 for example. It's interesting or in say inant that the part of Leviticus 16 again the kiper chapter which says hey this part is for always means you're always going to be doing this is the part of afflicting your soul why because we can always afflict our soul that is fast not eat not drink not anoint ourselves bathe and so on we could always do that and we do that every young kipur we don't bathe we don't eat, we don't drink and so on. We don't engage in these kinds of practices for one full day starting the eve of young kipper col until until the until mire of the next night basically 25 hours. So it's so I I hope you've noticed that when Leviticus 16 takes off when it shoots that that that booster rocket is saying, "Hey, this part is forever." It's not the part about the blood because the blood part meaning the sacrificial system which is very significant in Leviticus 16 is big but that's not forever because you won't always have a temple you won't always have a sacrifice as an example Daniel a blessed memory who was holy and he was sacred he was pure he didn't bring sacrifices on kipur what did he do and the bible openly says that he was a holy man. He was a righteous man. God called him my beloved. Please missionaries, I ask the Vatican to step forward and explain how did one of the people who you the Vatican consider a saint? You at Dallas Theological Seminary call him a saint? You at the Church of the Holy, whatever you call it, consider him a saint. How did he do it? There was no offerings. There was no sacrifices. This is all silly because it says openly in the Tory openly. It says openly that no one could die for anyone's sins. Deuteronomy 24:16. And in 2 Chronicles 6:36, it says openly that when you're expelled from your land and you're in exile in the land of your enemies far and near and you rethink yourself, you pray to heaven and confess your sins and God will forgive you for all your transgressions. It's so simple. Moreover, and this is something that no Christian can answer, like sometimes they can give a smoke and mirrors, but this you can't even begin to have it. We have a messianic prophecy in Isaiah 1, and I'm I'm deliberately selecting Isaiah 1. Why would I bring it? Because I I wanted to say it's a hostile witness. And I want to explain that. Meaning of course Isaiah is one of the greatest nim that ever lived. He lived right here. He walked down the streets near my home, preached there. But Isaiah 1 is one of the most burning. It may be said that Isaiah chapter 1 is the most painful, the most excoriating chapter in all of Tanakh. In fact, we read Isaiah chapter 1 before tisha of the ninth day of the fifth month, the saddest day of the year. We read that in the haura on the Sabbath prior to tisha. We read it with the with the sounds of lamentation with the music of lamentation. It's very painful. So, I I am deliberately going to a chapter that's it's so explosive most people can't get through it cuz it rips the Jewish people apart. But in the midst of it, Isaiah says, "Look, we can work this. I mean, God is speaking. We can work this all out. Let's reason together. If you feed the hungry, take care of the poor, the widow, the orphan. Although your sins are red as scol, I'll make it as white as snow. Intriguing. Then Isaiah soarses into the messianic age. And he tells us explicitly. So remember, where are we now? We are now in a time when we don't have a temple. We don't have offerings. We don't have sacrifices. We don't have that. Right? So Isaiah literally tells us, does it say Calvary? No. Does it say the blood of the unblenmished lamb? No. Does it say Galgatha? No. Does it say the cross? No. Say God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son. No. It says, which means that Zion will be redeemed through justice and through repentance openly. No blood, no sacrifice, nothing. It doesn't say a word about it. This is all made up. Meaning Christians are under the belief because they're reading Paul that you need a blood offering. You need a blood sacrifice in order to atone for sin. Quoting a book, they don't even know who wrote it. Hebrews chapter 9:22. Now, Leviticus 16:16 would be the response that missionaries would use. Leviticus 16:16. However, it says and you should make an atonement for the holy place because of the sins of your people. But what is that referring to? That an offering is brought for you. That's not an offering for everything. That is specifically, and I beg you, it's easy to remember this. Leviticus 16:16. All you have to do is remember the number 16 twice. It says explicitly, this is how you make an atonement for the sanctuary. What does that mean? Did the sanctuary, meaning the temple, the bisha mikdosh, did the temple went and smoked the cigarette on chabas, did the temple eat pork? What does that mean? Why? How does it So, what is that? What's going on there? When this is how one atones for sins against the sanctuary, against the temple, very specifically during the year, if somebody went into the temple impure, which is forbidden, means going to the muk mikdosh in a state of impurity, either unintentionally or intentionally. Undeniably means he walked through over graves and he didn't realize he was walking over graves and he should have known. Okay, but he didn't know and he should have known or he deliberately he went through a cemetery and he didn't tell anyone because he took a shortcut and he went on to the mak is a very grave sin. How do you atone for that sin? The way you atone for that kind of sin is you do the same thing but you do it in a state of purity and that's where the goat is brought in a state of complete purity and therefore it atones davka specifically explicitly only for sins against the sanctuary either knowingly or unknowingly. It's not if you went and I don't know had pizza on Passover, right? If you had bread, if you ate bread on Passover, it's a very grave sin, right? But you can't bring an offering in order to atone for that sin. There are other ways to deal with it. And in fact, we're told explicitly explicitly in Isaiah chapter 55 verse 6, but seven is very important, very very important. It says there that if the wicked man turns away from his sins, I will completely forgive him. No blood, no Calvary, no son, no church, no pope, no nothing. You ask a question, why would God forgive the person who repents? Because I'm able to do that. There are people in your life, it may be we don't know each other, but there's probably people in your life that you have never forgiven. And we might make the mistake of thinking that maybe we we create God in our image and we assume that God will never forgive me just like I don't forgive him or her. He'll never forgive me. So God says, "No, I don't do business like you. My ways are higher than your ways. My thoughts are higher than your thoughts. The heavens are higher than the earth. So too are my ways higher than your ways." Ha had no hose. When did he live? He lived the same time as Isaiah. Whereas Isaiah Yeshayahu lived here in Yuslam or I am Hosa. Hosea lived in the northern part of he was preaching in the north together with Amos. They were both in the north preaching here in yet many many prophets but the two that you really know about is Isaiah and Micah Yeshua and Miko they were all contemporary live at the exact same time in the ne during the neoassyan empire now this is very important why am I giving you a geography course of where they live what they live it's very critical because Hosea is speaking to the northern kingdom primarily although he's addressing Judah as But he says a very important thing. He says, "Israel, you have stumbled in your iniquity." Hosea 14 verse 1 2 3. It depends on which kind of Bible you take with you words. So he's speaking to a people that don't have a temple and return to the Lord. Say, "Let us render for bulls the offering of our lips." He openly says that. I'm not kidding. It means you pray instead of bringing offering. I didn't say that Jose and the NIV changes it. Let us render the fruit of our lips because it plays with the letters. It's mind-blowing. We have Micah chapter 6 or 67 and 8 that God doesn't want sacrifice. He doesn't want the Don't pay attention to Hebrews that says without the shedding of blood there's no atonement. That's a miscode in Leviticus 17:11. I because I know all the Christians are going Leviticus 17:11. Leviticus 17:11 is explaining why you're not allowed to eat blood. And what happens is Christians take it out of context. And people who are not studying Leviticus 17 are fooled by this chicainery. In Leviticus 11, as an example, we're told we're not allowed to eat unclean animals. And there's really no reason given for it. mean we're not told, we're just told it's an abomination for you. You can't eat a whole bunch of creatures with knowledge, but there's no real reason given. In Leviticus 17, we're told it's forbidden to eat blood, to consume blood. That's Leviticus 17:10. And unlike Leviticus 6 chapters earlier, here we are told why you're not allowed to eat blood. You're not allowed to eat blood. And that's Leviticus 11. And just so you know, the first word of Leviticus 17:11 is key because, you know, it's explaining the previous verse and missionaries rip it out of context. So the Torah is telling us the reason you're not allowed to eat blood. You actually have to cover it up with dirt. So no one can eat of it is because blood can only be used to make an atonement because that's where the life force of the flesh is. So therefore, you can only use blood to make an atonement. But it doesn't say without shedding blood is no atonement. That's Hebrews 9:22. So I'm telling you now, when you're enga engaging with a missionary, I'm getting too heated up. I don't want to. Most of the Christians you're going to meet are sincere. Some of them are really bad faith actors and but most of them are people this is what they're told every Sunday. right now. Right now, there are a billion people around the world in church right now. That's very safe. At least a billion people are in church right now. And this is what they're being told. And they don't know any better. The majority of them are Roman Catholic. Roman Catholics with very rare exceptions do not read Tanakh. I mean, it's very rare exception. They really don't. And Christians are usually reading the Christian Bible and then using that as a theological filter with which to understand the Hebrew Bible. So they're doomed. It's a big big problem. And that's why what I'm saying sounds odd. It sounds strange. And that's why I beg you, my dear friends, please, please, please look it up for yourself. You have to read it in context. See Hosea 6:E 6. See Psalm 51. God doesn't want these sacrifice. See Jeremiah chapter 7. Jeremiah explodes when people start talking about sacrifice. The temple of the Lord. Temple Lord. He says in verse 21, "When when I took you out of Egypt did I tell you I'll bring offerings." So make sure that you read it for yourself. Daniel, I'll finish this off. Daniel chapter 4 verse 24 or in the Christian Bible 27 when Nvanzar is told about his dream and what the consequences of his dream. The dream regarding the great tree that feeds everything is destroyed which means the Vanessar is going down. Daniel says to him, "So this guy said, "I'm a big liar because I said charity doesn't atone for sin." That's what this guy just said. Okay, test me out. Please test me out. Please look it up for yourself. Daniel again is chapter 4 verse 24 in the Hebrew Bible, 27 in the Christian Bible. Just look it up. Daniel tells directly, "If you give charity, then God will forgive your sins openly." That was Daniel, not Tovia. It was the Novi Daniel, not Rabbi Singer. So I say this, my brothers and sisters, if you're going to read the Christian Bible, you're going to read Paul, you're going to read, you're never going to know. And then you're going to read a few verses from Tanakh, which the pastor tells you to. You're just reading the Hebrew Bible through the prism of the New Testament and you're gone. Let alone you're not reading it in the original language. Go back to the original. If you enjoyed this program, please like and subscribe. I don't know. I share my love.