CHAZARAH - Zevachim Daf 29 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky

It's really a yontiff. We're holding smack in the middle of a check this out. We had yesterday the which we called. Remember we had two. I'll remind you we had and you see this the smaller the shorter and take a look at this. It's all it's in many different colors because every word basically we have nud here they go take a look we're going to do here look how oh look it's a double teaches us that when it comes to when it comes to it's referring to a thought that a per that a had regarding that he himself will be eating the animal the stakes that's or the is going to be eating the im or the blood two types of we learned that you need two components of the animal you need the blood and you need the im with the blood theim makes something else a misp but let's say you have it all goes in you don't have the two components you cannot be you can't do pigle with it oh and this is super important says I don't need from this one I see yesterday we learned from the word which is a time limit teaches us if a person had a thought instead of eating it for two days he said three days that's pigle teaches us a cannot do pigle even if you had the thought that this is going to be pigle this is I'm going to eat this in three four days from now and you go and you take a nice bite out of it. You're not why cuz it wasn't yet. You have to wait until after the heater that then it becomes pigle during the three the four but not you can't make it pigle retroactively let's say on the third day and eat it and say oh this is pigle it doesn't work retroactive teaches us that the animal becomes ple and not the human being it should be the opposite you think the ken did a bad thing so make him ple Punish him. He can't. He shouldn't be able to do the anymore. No. Now look at that. You saw that? Check this out. It's galdic. New new technology. We have a lot of stuff. So just moves up. Ah, here we are right over here. says we know that when you have a thought of gold you have the intent to eat this carbon outside of it's a lot of time you cannot have any other thoughts it has to be a pure of is and no other is no other thoughts that create now here I have a question what would you say logically what if somebody took a half a kaz in his mind the half a kaz he said this should be I'm going to eat a havoc on the barbecue in 5 days from now and also a havoc I'm going to do instead of you have two halves of do they come together do they combine to make this animal possible yes or no what do you guys say anybody you just pretending you didn't see the dafet Okay, good. Good. I like it better like that. >> The answer is as we're going to see right now the word pigle. So this is important to us. What is pig? Uh no we said pigle we saw before the word pigle comes in other words I don't need a second I learn it all from this one next what I learn from the word yeah and a half a kazman together creates one kaz of obviously there's no chus because you don't have a full kaz of but it's enough to make it possible that's the last thing here on the list theory says it in singular we we spoke about only one of them gets which one. So Rashi goes in to explain here as follows. We had also yesterday today it works yesterday didn't work. So actually explains first of all we have the from and the from one says so the other one also says so we have sha how do we know that is it doesn't say in the it says how do I know it's talking about though so because that we learn from keshes so it says rashi once I know this of kaidesh kaidesh kaidesh tells me that this by this is talking about and it says there so once I know by so I say that the long is talking about maybe it's talking about know that I have z yeah it's a little not complicated but if you were here yesterday it goes together what does z means if I had to compare to one thing either which one would you compare it to what No similar to something means I cannot eat it tomorrow. So it's time limited. So and also both of them and work on Obama whereas does not work on Obama because everywhere it's all over. Next according to what you just said that you can learn from one long. So why take a look at this chart again? Yesterday we discussed the long P and the short P. Yesterday you were trying to learn from the short P from the long P. But today learns both from one. So why in the world do I need a short to you? What do you do with that short says of threes? In order to do you have to be able to do three things, you have to be able to do the blood over there. The blood. There's only one place in the entire world where you can't do a murim. You could do a murm anywhere. You could have done a more anyway if there's a bummer one place you can't guess where it is inside the Bd where in the so if a person thought to himself I'm going to eat this meat in the he's not even on take a look if you look at this chart it says in in the in the right side under it also says says, "But what did we learn from? What do we learn from?" So, how could I learn from the word that has to be because it could have said, it could have said something else. Why say of three teaches two things? Why does the change the three Normally I mean pigu we're not going into the whole cl don't worry about it but a very simple thing means only in all of the world besides where in the pagle but the word pagle comes to to be more inclusive it adds it's it's a generalization so what does it come to add comes to add comes to Even the even no if if you think about the you're not on I want you to bend your ear go like this you need to listen to this this is amazing stuff she's talking about a thought a thought of pigle what does pigle mean thinks in his mind that he's he's going to eat the steak in 3 days from now instead of two. Maybe he's talking about somebody eating on the third day. Who says it means somebody that thought that he's going to do the on the third day listen to this boy say listen to this listen to this. He says how's it possible that the carbon was 100% kosher? You asked you you uh you told the guy the guy brings a carbon you said hey you can go home you had a kapar everything's good and three days later when the ken eats it then it becomes puzzle retroactively how could that be I I know he says I I have an answer to your riddle there is something like that this works by as well on the seventh Okay, but let's talk about easiest one means all she has to do is if she saw one Rio she has to wait one full day go to the mikvah after she goes to the mikvah she's completely why mixes she she she kept half the day it's as if the whole day but if she sees afterwards she's once they go to the mikvah she goes to the mikvah she's 100% tired if there's one for citing su she becomes. Oh, says if so in our also in our also even though this guy got a full no we could go back on it and becomes puzzle so says no I have a cost of not to do what you want to do it cannot become possible retroactive on the third day it says during the avoid in the that's when it becomes possible not on the third day. So over here it's a little bit different than the typical should say that is referring to the like we had before we mentioned it and the says that what that the one the one performing that he should become that's the lema that we had before that the animal becomes possible not the human being that messed ups. What do I do with this says this tells me listen to this. I would think since he's a he didn't bring his carbon. He waited until after some castori to bring his carbon. Don't bother bringing it. Go home. No, you got a nice am. But you should still bring your carbon. Maybe you shouldn't get a kapar at all because only if you do pigle you have to bring another carbon. Okay. Let's try to remember for 5 seconds. It says in the through the thought you're not through the third day itself. The third day itself doesn't make it possible. you thinking once uses this to tell me that you cannot bring a car that you do bring a carbon that you forgot to bring after you bring it. So, how does he know that when the Tory says that something is bad that it goes on the carbon and not on the before? He said the carbon is bad, not the but he uses up the we just said everything is so is not going to be you don't him. We're obviously talking about the the again to forgiveness is is referring to the carbon the lawyer not the I learned from another place the firstborn Bkar the firstborn is a bar male. Yeah. You take that male. What do you do with it? The first every firstborn animal. You take it, give it to the kite and the kite has to bring it to just eat from it. But the says, let me show you the this is this is a I didn't show it to the Hebrew. I didn't even have it as a thing. Put it in today. It seems like is only for the first year. So what do I do after the first year? You still bring it maybe should be compos I learned from there's a between the two just like doesn't come possible after the year is over it actually goes for years you can bring it to three years later if is like that so toanas they don't become possible after after yes you but you still bring So why does say I learned from another from you know what is one of the only that doesn't come to appease so to speak when you bring to to find favor ine is just a gift that you give to the coin maybe they shouldn't they shouldn't have anyap they shouldn't be doing a kapar kamashon that regardless the type of carbon could be any carbon you should bring it even after the the designated time that the Torah gives one more question gets now again why does Benaz use this word that if you mess up you don't bring your carbon until after we said today is the last day of the year unbelievable we can never forget this is the last day of of the year. So if you mess up, you bring it after you should still bring it. How does he know it? From the word see that the carbon didn't sin. Bring the carbon says no. He doesn't learn from that. If you mess up and you don't bring the carbon, guess what? Your wife doesn't get punished for it. So a woman dies, you know why? Because if a husband steals and he says, "I don't have what to pay back." Then she dies for that. So this Tyis over here, he says she's involved also. She lies for him. She helps him out. Means your wife. Why? Why will I take your wife from underneath you? Maybe I think that you are even she should also die. She doesn't die from it. Say from the from the you could only be pigle with your mind and not on the third day. It's not something that happens retroactive. What does it do with that? If you have a thought of of and you mix it up with a thought of it does not work. It has to be pure. One thought could take it could break the other one. do not mix in two different thoughts. You need a pure thought of do not involve how do you know they have a thought in you get malus listen to this boy we all know what's again what's pigle let's talk about it again and again so it gets into our head a person as he's performing the he thinks himself he's going to eat this carbon this steak in one year from now and then what after all the four avoid are done he goes takes a bite out of the steak then he's because he ate it. What happens if he doesn't eat it? Does he get an aero? Yes. Cuz he thought that it's without eating it. Does it get malcus on it? >> Oh says you get malus says you shouldn't think for the thinking alone you get malus. He didn't take any action. And how can you punish somebody with with with hitting him for something you thought in his mind goes according to this continuation of last mission we actually discussed at length. This is the rule. These are the four. If you do one of these four to eat the stakes or to put on the or the blood but if he thought to himself during this four that is I'm going to do this in a year from now I'm gonna eat this meat You have to do all four. In other words, you have to put the blood on the What does that mean? Always means in that he didn't have any thoughts, no thoughts to make it ru to ruin it. So in other words during this zero thoughts but then but the other three one of the three he had the bad thought that he's going to eat it outside of the lot of time. Oh there's a lot of redundancy here. Heed it with the but the other three he didn't have that. You don't need a in all four. One out of four is enough or in one of the four he did it. Great. That's the way to do it. That's the way. What does it mean? He didn't do it the right way. He shifted it with the intent of and then he thought about he mixed up the he started off with then he went to or he started and then he went or he just what's your only there's no curse. Why is there no curse? But he thought about what's the answer. You can't do two together. Again, this is the first mission of if you thought about a carbon pencil that's not a carbon or you thought about or and then he thought he started off then he mixed up another. If you just had that is and it passes the carbon what if you mix up two and we're going to have a whole tomorrow or is first and is after or he did half and half that that's where we at Okay. Or he started off with the half of why is that it combines that we learned from the today top of the right but there's no obvious because it's not a full of it's half and half. argue says if you start off with you're done you get cars ah five minutes later you add it's too late I get I get cars the doesn't know that says once you add you ruin the cars but if you start off with then you know you can't add to it and there's no cars It doesn't matter what you start off with. Even if you start with you only get no finally says the now you combine two things. Half of I'm going to eat as a steak. Half of I'm going to put on those two things do not combine. Everybody agrees to this. Have a beautiful wherever you are. >> Merit the of spreading Torah throughout the world. Sponsor Ashir today. mdysponsor.com or sponsor atmop.com.