CHAZARAH - Menachos Daf 15 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky

[music] Good morning. Says the Here we go. Check this out. We're starting off with a piece of art. We know that there's 12, this two rows, this two durum, each seder, each row contains six. And we also have two spoonfuls of levo. And come to of the mice. They walk by. They have a dead mouse on the stretcher. And the dead mouse touches one. What happens to the second row of breads since they weren't touched? Perhaps they're not one of the or a whole row of it. We must burn all the we consider all 12 of them and therefore you should take them out to the place where we burn stuff. There's two places. There's one inside. I'm going to show you the one that's outside. According to we burn it inside because it became inside. The point is there's a pile of stuff that we burn. holds that if you touch one, you touch them all. At the end, we're going to say because at the end of the day, we cannot divide up the carbon. They're all considered one entity, one gof, one one gush, I guess. So, if you touch one bread, all 12 become and argue. They say that the row of that the mouse touched that you're right. But the other row not you say no this is all 12 they say no you touched the dead mouse touched the left row the left is the right is so when we're talking about the so we have the go on the in other words when we we're talking about we're going to be discussing the two breads on that come together with the two schlamim. So over there you have you have the m you have what allows you to eat the bread. Burning the of the allows you to eat upon him. burning or doing with the blood of the allows you to eat the two breads of soar we have is before the m happened before you did before you were m the frankincense the when it comes to but once you locked it in with the m the It's as you see on the screen whatever you touched is whatever you didn't touch remains. So what would be the then if there's no is going to take this back but for now says that the is how do we view the tits? You know that this is a one of the clothing that the wears on his forehead from is how we do it. But it has powers to remove the concern of tum that we might have. question is once you have the sits can you even eat something that that has an issue with tuma that what so says rashi that the accomplishes but you're not allowed to eat the bread it's a good z that's what the tit does that even though there was tuma But there was a good in other words the carbon is a good carbon. But to eat the bread that you cannot do. Why? Because check it out that says once there's food that became there's a carbon that became not allowed to eat it. Okay. carbon good that sits is cannot accomplish anything and you're not allowed to eat any of the breads even though you're allowed to be because okay things that go onto the like blood like the go on that's it you're not supposed to put it on but if you put it on that sits gives it a ple and is nevertheless even in that case. If one of the two spoons became here, check it out. Another case we have walk by and this person somehow extends his hand and touches one of the spoons. So one is the other not they're both consider and but you continue going on that this is why because we don't separate these these items. If you touch one you touch them all. It's as if you touch them all. Nope. The one that's red, the one that's remains. The one that's is another question when it comes to and one of the 12 let's say Ruven all of Ruven is Tom. So now somebody from Shim is Tom can can he handle the carbon? All of Ruven can handle the carbon because there's a a large the majority of one is it's what about the rest of so the answer is yes they could all do it into why when it comes to the of the we don't divide them we don't split them up so if one shave It is kosher to do it even we cannot break up any of this and ask what does it have to do with regarding the tits like wanted to discuss this has nothing to do with the tits what does this has nothing to do with tits this has just to do with whether or not we we the of we don't split up theas. We don't split up the That's the idea. One more question. But going back to this, if one row of how did it happen? One row of became I was saying before was the left one. Now it's just the right one. Okay. It doesn't matter. name. They're both considered. It's just maybe because I have to start here. That's going to be the left. So cute. Boom. is that they're both send them both to the to the to get burned. And it says because we don't split them up. If you touch one pile, it says if you touched all piles, you divide them up. If it's true, are you saying that it depend about you should have said he should explain that has to do with no he got this with with tradition from his and his from his if you you cannot break things up. What part of the pile? One bread to it's as if all the breads became says. So that's our when a person has a thought of that he's going to eat this tomorrow instead of today. You're allowed you're only allowed to eat it today and his thought is to eat it tomorrow. So that automatically does piggle to all the breads. But if the thought was on the breads then it doesn't transfer that is of pigle to the animal. The bread does not cause to the animal. What's the case? Heid thinking in his brain that he's going to eat it outside the allotted time. In other words, tomorrow he's not going to eat it today. He's going to eat it when he's not allowed to eat it tomorrow. Both the animal and the bread become. And if you eat from it, but if his thought was on the bread, he's going to eat the bread tomorrow. It's delicious bread and he wants to eat it tomorrow. He's going on vacation. He needs to bring some bread. He wasn't thinking about the animal. It applies to the bread only the to the applies on when you have two as he's thinking of doing it in the red clock in the in the place on the animal. So since he did it on the animal, it transfers. You see how it just transfer jumps from the animal to the bread. But if his thought is that he's going to eat the bread outside the lot of time, so it does not transfer to the animal. Look, there's actually a special invisible shield. The animal is actually laughing at you because he will not become pigle. So now that we have the case of the two breads, if you do pigle on the two sheep, then automatically the two breads become pigle. But if you reverse it and you do the pigle on the bread, it does not cause to the sheep. What's the case? The sheep with the intent to eat them tomorrow. That also applies. It translates to the bread as well. His idea was to do it on the bread. That applies only to the bread and not to the animals. What's the reason that it trans from the animal to the bread but not from the bread to the animal? Now maybe because it says in the that is considered aid. So you see that the bread is called a so if the bread is called aid. So if you think about from bread it should transfer from bread to the animal. Animal and bread are the same. They're both called. So why can't it transfer from bread to animal? It only goes one way. Bread is called aid. So therefore when you think about aid goes to the bread but you don't call aid the bread. So therefore if you think about bread it doesn't go to the so how come when it comes to the two sheep it goes from the sheep to the bread but not from the bread of the sheep. Your wholear is because bread is called aid. You don't have as far when it comes to so says means because of the bread is because of the in other words the is the main thing here the is secondary it's aid and in fact when you the gives to the bread in other words the bread it comes as a I don't know the right word okay whatever okay great so therefore says the bread is because of and the does not is not secondary to the bread the bread is secondary to the is the the the we need both cases of with the bread and the bread. as we're going to see in a second is developing when it comes to the you have to do something called you have to lift up the the sheep together with the two breads and you do back forth all to the sides like a so says they are connected so to speak the breads and the animal are connected because you did together. So I would think that if you do pigle on the breads, it should transfer immediately to the to the sheep. Why? Because they are connected. You do together that's why you need both as a question. As you can see here as he'sing he'sing the animal and he thinks to himself I am going to eat tomorrow which is outside the aotted time after the time you're not permitted to eat any of the animal or bread I'm going to eat a half a kaz from the animal and a half a kazay from the bread together I have one which is the of pigle says I certainly cannot make the animal peagle. Why? We just established that if you do peel 100% on the bread, it doesn't transfer to the animal. But if you do pigle on the animal, it transfer from the bread. So if you do a half a shear from the animal, half a shear from the bread, of course it's not going to transfer from the bread to the animal. Even if you did a whole shear on the bread, it's not going to transfer to the animal. Of course, it's not going to from it from the bread. The question is, can the bread become pickle like this? Check this out. Can the bread become through a half a z of the meat and half a z of the bread? Can I use a half a from an animal in order to make the bread pigle? Now, if I made a whole kaz in the bread, of course, it's going to become pigle. But I only have a half as the bread and a half from the animal. Can I have a can I have a combination? Can it combine to makele? will come but not I have an interesting what's the which creates pigle in other words take the and that you have thoughts that you're going to eat the the animal outside of it it's a lot of time so it creates pigle to the bread it cannot become pigle through the bread this bread. You're trying to make pigle. So you're trying to take a half of bread together with the half z of the animal. Of course, it shouldn't become pigle. What's the what's the is stronger than the bread. To has the power to make the bread pigle. Yet it itself cannot become pigle through the bread. So the bread which is weak certainly it should not become pigle with a half a shear of the animal does that this doesn't usually work. We had a story. We know that it's also to plant in a vineyard. It's wheat. We're going to see soon. Couple things. This is you're not to plant in your vineyard other things. what they're doing right now sewing wheat is comes a guy a random person and decides to utilize the space between the vines for himself and he plants and we have a concept in you cannot answer something that doesn't belong to you now it doesn't always apply but in this case it does why because is and it's not just it's a penalty of says the story came from and they said that everything you planted becomes but all the vines are 100% motive say exact he just said now the grapes that they cause is they themselves they become hab is certainly what you planted these these different seeds that you planted they didn't create the grapes certainly they themselves shouldn't become why don't bring me right from here the answer cannabis I don't know if it means what they call today cannabis something similar from the same family or hemp That's but everything else is only this guy that planted where he wasn't supposed to be planting punished him. But the guy that owns the vineyard did not penalize him. Why can't you say? Now, we're going to go really quick because word for word what we just said. It's just instead of talking about the we're going to be talking about the two sheep on same words over somebody the sheep in order to eat a kaz a total half from the sheep and half from the bread. Certainly you cannot make the sheeple if you had in mind while you're doing a hulk is ice from bread onto the sheep it doesn't work certainly if it's only half from the bread and half from it it's not going to work but the question is can I use the half from just take this chart and pretend it's can I take a half from the sheep and half from the breads and make the breads also Can I combine the sheep, the meat, the half together with the bread? Over here also we'll say the bread becomes pigle but not the sheep. We should say the same for the sheep who are the ones that do pigle. They themselves become pigle. So certainly the bread that that is coming to become pigle and it didn't become pigle certainly shouldn't make the main the strong guy the sheep pigle we had a story somebody planted in a in a blooming vineyard planted some seed and over there we said that he gets punished but the owner of the vineyard does not you should say the just said the grapes don't become so the the seedlings in the center they're coming to the grapes certainly they should themselves should not become what's the connection there's only few things but other seeds are so the person who planted He did the he gets punished but the owner of the vineyard doesn't get punished. He didn't do anything when it comes to the carbon. So certainly on the sheep of explain it's only because by the sheep of this like did he raised lift this that together with the bread. So now we just tie the breasts together with the animal. That's why they're one perhaps. And that's why they're connected. And that's why if you do a I said that's why six times that's why if you think about piggle on the breads maybe transfers to the sheep because they're one such thing like this. as something else. If he a sheep, now we're talking about the two sheeps, okay? These two guys and he a sheep to eat from its friend tomorrow. Now, what in the world is a friend? We know that you have to both sheep in order to eat the bread. So, each one is a 50% matter. Each one allows you to do bread but only in a 50% capacity. When I say friend, do I mean I'm looking at this guy, the friend I'ming on the right, his friend is on the left or perhaps his friend is referring to the bread since either I hold that in I can't dole on half or I hold you could but it's it's Not enough over here. I was referring to the bread and becomes we learn to one of the sheep in order to eat from itself tomorrow. In other words, the sheep are not connected. And therefore, if I make one, it doesn't apply to the other. But it says, and says the word friend, and it's referring to guess what? The sheep, not the bread. So that's a that we're talking about sheep and not bread. the both. What do we see from here? When I say the word friend, I mean the other sheep because if I'm talking about the bread, the bread would become says not a good because maybe over here we're talking about a situation where he actually says not just the word friend but he [clears throat] says friend sheep says the There are two carbonas and the where in addition to the actual carbon you bring a bunch of wine. Now let's talk about the schlam is easier to understand because you get to eat the actual animal. It's a you get to eat it as we know it all goes in. So complete once you pour the wine into the vessel so becomes and when I think a bad intent I think while I'ming this that I'm going to eat the in three days from now instead of two days I could do pigle this wine in the cup becomes pigle But if my intent was on the wine, I'm saying this wine should become that doesn't have an effect on the animal. What's the case to eat it tomorrow? Now it could also be referring to the I say I'm going to put the tomorrow who itself. Let's talk about the itself the animal becomes. So too does the wine become. But if I say I'm going to put the wine tomorrow, I'm going to do it later than I'm allowed to. So that actually creates pigle to the actual wine. And if I drink the wine, but has no effect on the because you cannot transfer the pigle from the wine to the you could transfer from the to the wines because there's something that has a in order for something to become pigle it has to have a mate that we discussed yesterday. So the all this leftover flour from the kim becomes pigle. Why? Because this small amount of goes on the misb this is the m this is the all for me to eat this. The same thing when it comes to when I sprinkle the blood on the allows me to eat the at that moment I'm allowed not a moment before. So has a mlim I can eat a carbon has a matter the wine also has a matter when I sprinkle the blood on the then I'm allowed to put the wine on the There's it seems like there's no connection between the carbon animal and the wine. Why? Because I could bring the carbon today and I could bring the wine in 10 days from now, in 20 days from now, in two years from now. There's no limit to when I could bring the wine. So, they're not connected. If they're not connected, I can't I can't make from one to the other. You're right. But in a situation where I do bring the wine today together with the carbon says but at the last moment I can switch it from animal A to animal B and therefore they're not connected. Once I this animal then this wine is appointed to this animal. I can't change it to another animal. We're going to do the same exact thing all over again to the bottom of the and then we stop the amount of a of oil. So let's see if we have an updated version. I know that Yoshi wanted to this by the way pouring the wine on his into the Let's see. No, this is wrong. Why is it wrong? Because it's the wrong side of the thumb. It's supposed to be on the nail part. But anyways, just to remind you supposed to smear oil on top of the blood and on on his toe and his thumb and on his head on his ear and the rest goes on his head. So if the taught to himself that he's going to use this oil, you know, in another day from now, we'll see that that's not really the case. It's more with with the ka because the blood of the ash that the brings allows you to bring to to apply the oil on his thumbs on his thumb and on his large toe. What's the connection between the carbon and the oil? The oil can be brought 10 days from now, 100 days from now. I'm referring to oil that comes together that day with you can put it and and designated to another carbon. Once you then the oil becomes locked in just like the breads of a taid they become locked into that particular taid and therefore you can't change it and therefore they are one if they're one unit one has hash on the other. So if I do pigle on the asham it has an effect on the oil as well. Have a wonderful day. Merit the of spreading Torah throughout the world. Sponsor Ashir today. mdysponsor.com or sponsor at mdyop.com.