Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
CHAZARAH - Menachos Daf 13 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky
1,325 views
- Good Morning - 12B - 13A - 13B - Have a Wonderful Day! Quiz - http://Kahoot.MDYdaf.com -- *To receive the "Nothing but the Daf" Chazarah Shiur daily via WhatsApp:* https://chat.whatsapp.com/FeQFPX1eKOHF6wkOETOuTB MDY presents: "Nothing but the Daf", R’ Eli Stefansky’s MDY (Mercaz Daf Yomi) Shiur in a concise format - all the clarity of the full daf Shiur, with Reb Eli's unique charts and visual aids, without any extras (emails, stories etc.) Perfect for Chazarah or anyone who wants a quick, focused Daf.
Chapters
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
live from a hotel room in Connecticut.
We're holding by a brand new mission.
Try to do a quicker shear than usual.
We're talking about people. We're
talking about a person who as he's doing
the he has a a thought that could ruin
or not ruin in some cases this his
thought let's talk about this this is
the large amount of flour this is what's
left over after the puts his hand in
takes three fingers worth puts it in a
let's say he puts it right over here
small amount flour
this goes on the this over Here, see the
two amounts. The small amount is the
kita. Goes on this back. The large
amount is the shim. If I had a nice pen,
I couldn't find one. Goes up. Let's
write shir over here. Nice big letters.
So, the guy says,
I'm going to take if if he said, I'm
going to take a full kaz of this and eat
it. Make a bread out of it. Make a donut
out of it tomorrow. That's full-fledged
pagle. You ruined the why? Because he
said, "Tomorrow you're only allowed to
eat it today." And it's the full amount,
the full kaz. And if he says, "I'm going
to take this a full kaz of this and put
this where do I put on the mbah? I'm not
going to eat it. It's not it's not for
human consumption. This goes on the it's
a certain eating of the misb eats it. It
consumes it. There's an of the
what happens if he says I'm going to
take a half a of what's supposed to go
on the not a full
and a half of what I'm supposed to be
eating a donut. I'm going to make a half
a donut
together. I have a whole
why is it? You're right. I have a total
of one. But since there are two types of
eating, one is a human consumption and
it's only half a it's half. The other
one is consumption. It's half.
They don't combine together. They're
not.
It says in the
half
to eat and to put
you could infer and be
that this doesn't work. But what does
work? If it's a half a of a half of to
eat, what if I said instead of saying
I'm going to put half a on this of this,
I'm actually going to use it for my
donut. I'm going to consume it
physically like a human being consumes.
Now, it's not really meant for human
consumption. It's meant for his bath
consumption. But I'm gonna use that half
a kazay from the and combine it with the
half a of the and together have a whole
kazayas and
from the Mishna that that would be a
good piggle. It's only not a pigle the
top two but the bottom two you could
infer that it is otherwise the mission
would have said it
is going to say what you're saying is
beautiful. It's a great inference and
it's a good deal. But let's something
else. So let's see inside.
But if I'm going to eat the as food,
then it would combine to make a full and
make
that it's not if you look at the says
you're right. We have a little bit of
mantana. Who's our that says that
to take a that of something that's
supposed to go on the and actually eat
it as a donut, it would combine with
another that you're allowed to eat the
and make it a full to make it legal.
Who's that? That's the
It doesn't matter if it's meant for
consumption. A human being can consume
it. Doesn't matter if it's a human being
consumption can consume it. You could
combine the two. As we learned in the
That's what we're talking about. So
that's not the to eat or it's I'm sorry.
Yeah.
to take the and put it on is also not
something that is that that's done but
you did it
and what is over here
we could see this
if a person says I'm going to do pigle
of
I'm sorry and a
or reverse aaz he starts off saying I'm
going to do one I'm going to eat it
tomorrow which is
and I'm going to do also and then it
says
you're going to take a half two halves
of
one half of is one half is combining the
It doesn't matter how you started off,
which one started first.
So we already have this
why I need it twice.
If I'm going to tell you that I'm taking
something that's edible and something
that's not the way to eat it. In other
words, it go it fits on the but I put it
together. I would say that it's that I
can't say. Why? because I already
learned that it's
now we skip these two lines
and if I'm going to tell you that
something that's like our
something that's for for human
consumption something that's from put
together are
then I keep him dying from
If you if I if I want to take two things
to eat a half a
of something that's edible and something
that's not edible,
they don't combine.
So certainly if it's something that's to
eat and something that I want to put it
on, they shouldn't combine. If I want to
eat the two of them, eat, consume it.
But one is edible and one is not edible.
They don't combine. So certainly if I
don't want to consume it, I just want to
half of it I want to consume and the
other half I want to put in his back.
How could it combine? Says no there's
more as far as to say that does combine.
Why
I do need that case
if you do something unnatural. In other
words, I'm taking something like this
bag. This is the belongs and I said I'm
going to eat it. That's not a natural
thing. That's against
so okay no that's why it's not that's
why it doesn't make sense that it
combined but
when I did the right thing this I said
half of his eyes from here that which is
edible I'm going to eat and half his
eyes from here which goes on and said
I'm going to put on this. So I'm doing
the right thing. Maybe it should combine
that, but it's not
says the first Mishna of the second
parrot.
This is a classic case of
he does and he says, "I'm going to eat
the leftovers tomorrow.
Or he says, "I'm going to take the and
I'm going to put it on the
tomorrow." It's two types of
consumptions of eating.
Everybody agrees that that's you ruined
it.
It's actually you get for it. Now the
question that the is going to ask is why
would I say that doesn't say that?
Because continues and he says on this he
does argue
as we're going to see there's two parts
that go onto them they have to burn part
number one is this baggie part number
two is in the Amazon bag
the frankincense must go on the misb as
we're going to see they're both very
essential to gobb and they both comprise
50% of what goes on
so if a person has a mind that he's
going to burn the leava the frankincense
tomorrow. That's also
just like when he thinks that he's going
to burn this flower tomorrow.
We have
say listen is just like the flower.
What's the difference? And if you have a
thought about the lev that you're going
to eat it or you're going to consume the
is going to consume it not that you're
going to eat it but the is going to
consume it tomorrow which is not the
right time. It's after the allotted
time. The lot of time is up to today you
have to put it on not tomorrow. say if
you think that and then you go ahead and
you eat the the cars and says no no no
that applies to the only to the flower
but not to the you're right if you think
that you're going to ruin the carba but
you're not going to get cars for it
that Hashem chops down a person's life
short that's reserved only for the
flower
and they try to prove it to him you're
probably thinking that the is separate
of the flower. But guess what? The leva
is very similar to the imm
parts that we put onto the misbeh.
And yet, if you think in your mind,
well, as you're doing, you're going to
put those parts the imam, you should
have put the picture of imam here. You
thought to yourself, they're going to
put those parts onto this
tomorrow. That's real people cars for
that. So, how come how come is
different?
Answers very nicely.
Look, they all come from the same
animal. The kidneys, where do they come
from? They come from from a different
they come from this animal.
But when you referring to the
frankincense, that's a different that
comes in a different bag. That comes
from Amazon, from a different place.
Says
What is the point of the beginning of
the mishna? We all know what pig is
already is when a person has a thought
that he's going to eat consume this part
of the tomorrow. So what's the point of
you telling me oh he also agrees to it.
There's no one in the world that
disagrees with that
says tomorrow
in the second part of the says but if
you thought about putting the
frankincense on tomorrow there's no says
there is no
now we're going to have a beautiful
piece it's not a it's not a complicated
piece at all a very simple piece
Think about it. When can the cayenne
benefit from this flower and eat this
flower? Make give it to make donuts out
of this. When only when this goes onto
the m when this goes onto the fire at
that moment this becomes. So this
becomes a m it allows you this flower
allows you to eat this. But wait a
minute. There's one more thing that it
must go on. It's called Levino. You see
this bag that I just got from Amazon?
This this this bag right over here in my
hand full of these beautiful crystal
yellow pieces of leavo.
This also must go onto the misb.
So these two, you see these two bags,
they must go on the misb.
If I only put one bag, so I got 50% of
the mat. I put another bag, I got the
100% of the matter. Each one is 50%.
Oh, so says I would think the whole that
I cannot do peel with only half. The
flower represents 50% of what allows me
to eat the it's a half of the pigle.
It's a half of the m sorry half of the
m. So maybe you cannot do pigle on a
half on 50%.
You could do pigle 100%. If you think
while you're doing the flower, you think
to yourself, I am going to
eat this uh
I'm going to put this flour onto
tomorrow.
That's enough to be
at the same time.
I don't think that that applies even in
the case of flower
I do and I'm thinking to myself that I'm
going to put this on the tomorrow. I
think oh but putting this on tomorrow is
only 50% of the matter so it shouldn't
be pigle. Oh, it is pigle.
He says, "No, it's a full pigle for
everything."
If a person says, "We have he takes, you
see this bag of I'm holding in my hand
from
said
listen to this. When I am holding this,
I'm doing kima. I cannot think. I don't
have the right to think about the levina
going on tomorrow. And when I'm doing
levina, I don't have the right to think
about my flower. One has nothing to do
with the other. I can have I cannot have
bad thoughts about another thing.
Maybe is when you have
a certain amount of flour and a certain
amount of frankincense.
So, one can't the other because they're
different.
Oh, here it is. When you have two
spoonfuls of fragrances like on the
same
I would say that perhaps they should be
that they're not even if it's the same
men.
So the the says over here I think it's
his yard. I didn't have a chance to
check. Somebody told me yesterday that
it's his yard side. I don't know. That's
what he said. It's right around his
yard. I know it's right around here,
but I I thought it was a very nice that
he says, "Why would I think that
the two different the two spoonfuls of
frankincense that are that we have with
upon him? Why would I think that one has
the the ability to to if it's not in the
same as we're going to see soon, it has
to be one cle but I'm saying it over
here because now this is where we we
said it. He has a that maybe is
considered one vessel. Why would two
spoons be one? Because they're both
sitting on one. The
grabs them and makes them one if I
understood him correctly.
Are you able to tell me? Are you able to
look me in the eye and tell me that is
not talking about because it's one
it's one item
versus two
in the
why is and and flower different than a
skirt steak and the rest of an animal.
So what does he answer them?
What do you mean the skirt steak and the
and the kidneys come from that same
animal? Well,
fragrances is not the same item as the
flowers. You see that he is talking
about it being one and two different
things.
You didn't understand
he's not referring to whether it's one
or two items. He's saying that one
doesn't prevent the other one from
happening. What does that mean?
It's not like
the way it works is if I want to eat the
leftover, I have to put the on the misb.
As long as I don't put this on the mah,
I cannot eat this. So, one prevents the
other. But that's not the case with leva
frankincense.
In other words, I could put the
fragrances on the even though I didn't
put the on the and I could put the on
the even though the fragrances is not
on. In other words, one does not prevent
the other from happening.
It's not similar to the kam that you
can't eat the as long as the kam is not
in his
as long as they don't put the he can't
eat the
I would think that the can prevent the
but
no
whichever one of the two I want to put
on his back first whether it's the
frankincense first or the flower first I
can put on first
So we know
you're supposed to bring two breads, two
breads and two sheep, two
each schlamim can you cannot be from one
to the other. In other words, if I have
if I'm shinglim
number one on the right and I think to
myself that number two on the left, I'm
going to eat that one in three days from
now. That's not why because A has
nothing to do with B. Why does A have
nothing to do with B? Because they're
not they were never put together in one
vessel.
But when you put the two things together
on vessel like
so you have the levino you see the lev
on the left
those those little rock looking things
I have the leav together on top of the
flower on top of the dough so they were
both in the same vessel
then it should be as if It's one great.
Take a look at this.
Doing so, removing the the
from the large bowl and putting it on
the misbeh.
If he does it, if
moves it from vessel A to vessel B, you
have to start all over. It's possible.
You can't add another amount of and let
let the kind do it. It's too late. Once
he did it, it's possible. Why?
It's because this is like walking.
Cuz
walking without your feet with your
hands is also walking. In other words,
when I take the lev from right over here
and I move it to right over here, I just
walk. Not with my feet, with my hand. I
just moved it from area A to area B. You
saw that's what he did over here as
well.
Not this one. This one.
He's moving it from the left of the
screen to the right of the screen.
That's walking.
I moved it closer to the misb. Now it's
easier and closer to get to the misb. So
I moved it. Now sometimes you move
something with your feet. You move it
with your hand. You have to hold the
moving without your feet is also
considered
a walking.
And therefore walking is one of the four
avoidas. What are the four avidas?
walking to the and being. So you just
the Israel just did one of the four and
that makes it possible.
We also learned
here are the four.
So let's it's the Gar is going to say
all four right now.
This is the if you have a of while you
do
or putting into the vessel and doing and
being
as you can see in this chart on the
right has resembles
and the third one to bring it towards
the no you bring it towards it's exact
and throwing the the carbon onto the
fire
the onto the fire. It's similar to
throwing the blood onto the
butting the number two from the right
the purple putting the into a vessel.
Why is that similar to blood?
Because you can say it's similar. It's
not similar at all.
Blood goes squirting out of the carbon's
neck. All you need to do is put a vessel
there and it fills it up with and the
vessel fills up by itself. But over here
you physically have to take the kit and
put it in. So it's very different.
you must do this and if you don't do
this
how are you gonna get it to the to the
so since you have to put it in a vessel
to get so it's considered a significant
and therefore you could be during that
so it's similar to
if you don't gather it so you won't be
able to bring it to them
So therefore becomes
it's an important
so therefore I make it as if it's
no it is similar to it's similar to what
was the question we have but happens by
itself you don't have to put the blood
into the vessel squirts out by itself or
you have to put the
the into the vessel
No, at the end of the day, let's look at
it differently. You have a gusha the cle
it's a kishar it's this golden vessel
has inherent and therefore what
therefore it's the the that infuses into
the
so who cares if it happened by itself or
I'm sorry yeah who cares if the blood
went in by itself or that you put it in
the the bottom line is what happens
afterwards what's Once it's in the clay,
it becomes
a good shabas. Have a wonderful day.
Thank you so much.
>> Merit this of spreading Torah throughout
the world. Sponsor a share today.
mdysponsor.com or sponsor at mdy.com.