Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
CHAZARAH - Chullin Daf 69 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky
166 views
- Good Morning - Introduction - 68B - 69A - 69B - Have A Wonderful Day -- MDY presents: "Nothing but the Daf", R’ Eli Stefansky’s MDY (Mercaz Daf Yomi) Shiur in a concise format - all the clarity of the full daf Shiur, with Reb Eli's unique charts and visual aids, without any extras (emails, stories etc.) Perfect for Chazarah or anyone who wants a quick, focused Daf.
Chapters
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
[music]
Good morning.
Yesterday we discussed this case. That's
basically what we're discussing today
and that is that a pregnant animal you
doan you don't have to perform to the
fetus because that's called a benua. But
what if the animal the fetus stuck its
leg out for a moment and then brought it
back in? So we saw yesterday between and
Rav says that part that came out you
can't eat that was already born that
little part and when you bring it back
into the body the mother doesn't apply
to that part says no there's no such
thing you could you could do to the
mother and you could even that part. So
let's see how it looks like. This is Rav
Rav says
the peace that comes out is
they say these words basically the same
exact thing just different words
when that limb goes out it was born. You
can't unborn something. If a child is
born you can't put it back in in its
mother's stomach and say oh it wasn't
born. It was born. Can't there's no
that's it. It's that it's over. The leg
came out, it was born. Another length,
leg came out, it was born.
The question is why is it said in
different words? It's the same exact
thing addresses that
they say slightly different. The same
idea but different words
once the the the hand the leg both come
out. Yesterday somebody came over to me
in the Shir and said it's only the hand
because the leg makes it a not true. It
could be anything
says there's no such thing as
one limb being born. You need a you need
something substantial.
But what's the difference between these
two on the screen? They both say the
same thing. The a itself that went out
is or it was born and therefore it's
both
more beautiful
in this case like right over here
only part of the foot came out part of
the hand came out but the rest is still
inside the mother. So the rest that's
inside the mother is it also according
to rav or not? If you say
the whole limb was born so I don't care
how much came out once part of it came
out a significant part the rest is also
aeron
yesterday said
>> your son noam said what
>> he says so then it would be the opposite
and and if and according to the other
the other lion no whatever comes out
comes out the whatever ever whatever is
born that's what's according to the
second that it's a lea it's a birth so
it doesn't matter if some of it is left
inside even the part that's left inside
is still to eat because the whole limb
was was born but he so your son said so
then there' be another if only part of
it came out a little uh 10% of the leg
came out would be completely mut to eat
according to the because it wasn't
wasn't born and he's right discuss it
here we go we're starting with the
questions Now a lot of questions today
and they start getting more and more
interesting
according to says that there's no such
thing as
a limb being born. You need a
If the fetus sticks out the hand and
then pulls it back in. That's the right
hand.
And then he stuck out his left hand and
then he stuck out his right leg and then
he stuck out his left leg. Then he stuck
out his spine. Rashi says
and finally he did he did enough that
total the front and the back and the
right and the left they all equal to 60%
of the whole fetus
and at the end of the day when you add
up all the hands and feet that he stuck
out you have 60% and only a small amount
is left inside and therefore the entire
thing is considered
that that was born
the of the mother does not work on that
whatever is left over inside
according to there's no lea to limbs so
every time he pulls it back in it wasn't
born so the 10% that he pulled out they
put out in the beginning doesn't combine
with the 10 the second 10% and the third
10% they don't combine because there was
never a birth every time he he he stuck
it out he pulled it in there was never
birth. So how do you combine these
totals? You can't. So then says, "Oh, so
then let me continue my question.
So I I'll roll with you. Every time he
pulls it back in, it cancels the birth.
There's no birth at all. So therefore,
there's no roy birth.
What if he chopped it off? Every time
the front the front right came out,
chop. Front left came out, chop. Back
right came out, chop. [snorts] So now
together there's a pile over there of
chapped limbs and together there was a
birth
until there was 60%
at the end of the day you have 60%
laying on the ground there
a birth needs to be
a 60% birth at one shot not peace meal
chopped up meatsh
So if you look at the Mishna,
the Mishna says like this four lines
down.
If you take a piece of the of the fetus
and you cut it while it's still in the
mother's stomach,
I'm just reading I'm reading the the
first gives us that if you cut let's say
the leg of the animal, you stick a knife
into the stomach, cut the leg out off
and the leg remains inside and then you
chef the mother says the mission allowed
to eat that leg even though it wasn't
attached to the fetus. Then the Mishna
finishes off. Here's the total rule.
If it's part of the mother animal, like
her kidney, a part of her kidney, and
then you the mother, you're not allowed
to eat that kidney. Why? Because the
kidney when you cut it.
But the continues,
if it's part of the fetus and you cut
the leg of the fetus, it remained inside
it. What did the Mishna add in
the Mishna? If you cut part of the
animal while it's still inside the
animal, you allow to eat it through the
the of the mother. And then the mission
says must be is coming to say a big
what's the big
top line
what's the why why why is the mission
repeat itself last week is telling us
this this if you cut a bunch of limbs
off and a little part of the animal
remains the fetus some of it remains
inside the mother's stomach and then you
shake the mother you let it eat that
little part that it's not considered
a birth to the whole animal.
It's not coming to say that. It's coming
to say the that we saw yesterday. This
part of
when if it gave birth to a camel looking
animal that it's it's not paras doesn't
have the split hooves. So if it remains
in the stomach, you're allowed to eat
it. If it came out, it's
if you have a meaning it's not a son of
a of a cow.
That's because it came out to the world.
That's what the Mishna is saying. I have
a rule. If it remains inside the
mother's stomach, even though it's not
my first, I'm allowed to eat it.
Another interesting question.
said this is the B mikdash
a very rudimentary picture from back in
the day
that red those red dots that's where you
the animals that's the in the mdash
you people could go into the on the left
side but the right side the right square
on the side that's where all the happens
that's where everything happens that's
where the misb is you put it on top of
the misb etc
we know that when you have there's two
categories of animals kumachum
you have the kasum
the kas once you chef that you can't
come out of these red walls so these red
walls are and our whole we're talking
about like mentioned before
how do we know this whole idea of hand
coming out leg coming out because it
says that the meat in the field is a tra
just say the meat that's tra you're not
allowed to eat like why What's what's
the bas? So he said bas means it's a
place that doesn't have makas
that once once it goes out of the makita
no good. So the is asking what if you
have an animal inside the dotted line.
In a way those dotted lines are a forum
you can't go out of it. So in essence we
have two mitz here. We have the makita
of the mother and we have the mikdash.
So perhaps if the animal stuck its hand
out inside the dotted line that that
creates a makita for the animal and it
doesn't make the the legs. If the animal
sticks his hand out of its makita, its
mother's mita becomes because it's not
it's no good. Over here it's not it's
within special walls the of the mdash.
What's the going to say? But there's
other animals that have a different
makita the entire
you can take out to the entire. So what
are you going to tell me? That if it
stuck its hand out in the entire it's
okay. Makes no sense.
a carbon stuck out hand. Now obviously
if you the mother animal with the baby
inside the baby's like the mother you
put on the you could eat the baby etc.
What's the question
since those dotted lines are
for
so it's also for when a baby sticks his
hand out.
Perhaps it's not a makita for this. I
heard a story.
Why? Because there's only one for a
fetus. It's it mother. We don't it
doesn't care about the md for for the
for the baby. It has the of its mother.
It's not it's not the of the is not
important to him.
I don't understand. You're telling me
the walls for for for carbon there's
other carbonas many carbonas on the
column side you have the
all these things
that your is the if you bring it into
your okay outside you bring it to it's
not not good
and over there you should ask the same
question what if the animal stuck its
hand out in
how come you never ask that question
because when we look at the fetus. It's
the mother who creates not.
If you think about it for a second, the
the Uber, the fetus has from its mother.
It is well protected. It has the food
that it needs. It has air conditioning,
[snorts] heating.
If the mother gets hurt, it's protected
from all sides. It has everything.
Ah,
it's getting better. Here we go.
There's two pipes.
This is the trachea, the breathing pipe.
Looks literally like this. And then you
have the esophagus. This is what he the
animal eats. It's much it is um more
elasticky. It's more muscular. It
doesn't have the the bony structure that
this has. Now, when you do, you have to
cut the majority of both of these. At
least 51% of this and 51% of this. So
now, oh, I've been waiting a long time
to use this. He he shifted one sim and
then all of a sudden the hand of the
animal came out right over here. And
then
>> in between the sim and then he chefed.
Oh, this is bad.
>> Then he shifted the second one. See here
the Shiloh. Here's the Shiloh. Let me
explain. When when you sh an animal, you
accomplish two things. First of all,
you're allowed to eat it after you do.
Second of all, a big that we learned
throughout was a big for everybody that
it removes the tum.
If the animal dropped dead without then
give off tum if you no tuma. Now
you started off great. Everything is
going well. You cut one. You
accomplished two things. You're in the
middle of accomplishing two things.
You're about to be able to eat it and
you're about to get rid of the tuma.
Then all of a sudden this fetus guy
decides he sticks out his feet. Oh, I
just realized fetus and feet. He st he
stuck out his hand. Yeah, he stuck out
his hand in middle. So now you can't eat
that hand. You can't eat it. So now the
second sim accomplishes something
different than the first sim. The second
simmon allows you only to eat the the
the
mother the the baby but not not that
leg. The question is can the second
simmon accomplish at least that that leg
that comes out will not give over tum.
And the answer is says yes because the
[clears throat] second the second simmon
accomplishes tremendous. It accomplishes
you're allowed to eat the entire animal.
You're allowed to eat the entire fetus.
There's not there's no stop, no break in
the you continue going on. There's a
beautiful that you're able to eat the
fetus. So at least it'll remove the says
does when you continue number two
usually the brown pipe the sophagus is
number two. Does it remove the tuma of
the leg? Because the leg never was the
leg was nevered. And when you have a
uned leg, you have a uned animal, it
gives off tum. So this leg gives tuma.
We actually had it the top words in the
bay that the leg is so that it gives
tuma to the rest of the animal. But he
gave a he did a here. So maybe he
removes the tuma.
No, it removes the why
the second sim is good. It's a good and
allows you to eat even the fetus, the
mother for sure. Even the fetus
certainly should have enough power to to
to get rid of the noa. Something to
think about. Okay,
this is fascinating. This question right
over here here. Oh, what happened? You
have a fetus. You have a b a unborn
animal that stuck its hand out. We
saying according to Rav, well, even
according to everybody, if it didn't
bring the the hand back in that leg that
it stuck out, you're never allowed to
eat. So, you have a walking animal, that
was the question I asked in the
beginning of yesterday. You have a
walking animal, it's running around the
barn, you're allowed to eat the entire
thing minus its front leg. Why? Because
that front leg never it stuck it out
before the of its mother. There's
nothing you can do about it. You can't
check the the fetus. It's uncheckable.
It was already checked. It's walking
around. You can't check it. And it never
got a head for its front leg. Listen to
this.
This guy, he grows up and
he gets married
and they have a baby.
What about the front leg of the baby?
>> Wow. Is route. Does the front leg of the
baby have the same like its father? So,
we have to understand who do you get
married to? Do you get married to like
the cacao or another weird weirdo like
him? Another bas that's the sha
in three words
have to be concerned that the
the the the offspring of this father who
has a bad leg a bummed leg that you
can't eat what about his offspring
perhaps the entire offspring is also
also that's that's part of the shilah
not just this leg maybe part of the sh
is the entire thing why because the
father has one 10% of him that you can't
meat. Now, when he has offspring, that
10% spreads to his entire body of the
baby. The entire 100% is is infected
with this non-g good leg that he has.
If he got married to a regular female
cow, nothing to do with a bas.
So, why are you telling me that he has a
bad leg? His whole body is bad. He he
his offspring when he gets married he he
his children are goners the opposite of
the guy from Australia. We had the guy
from Australia yesterday. In Australia
they want to take this benqua make a
with a baspa and then they have
offspring bene and you never need to do
but if one of them is a bakua and the
other one is a regular animal that
messes everything up. Why? Because the
father is not shakable. You can't check
the father. Why can't you sh the father?
Cuz he's a bimpa. There's nothing to
she. You can just eat him. Start eating
right now. Wait until he drops dead.
Start eating.
The mother needs to be. So what do you
do with the offspring? They're you can't
sh them and you you could you have to sh
them. You can't them. So
says
according to him
he says there is nothing you can do
about it. Why? So explains rashi
because
it's as if you didn't.
Why? Because one of the sim
every sim you take a look at every sim
this here's a sim and this is a sim this
simmon 50% is already shed
>> from the father
so now you have to shaft another 50%
maybe 50% of the father you don't know
what you
it's already you nevering you could sh
but you're not shing you have to it's as
if half of his esophagus and half of his
tra are missing you're
the gun.
That's what he holds.
Listen to this.
So the question is
do we say that the father the father's
leg goes into the baby's leg and that
leg is also so what do you do?
So just cut ignore that front hand, cut
it off and eat the rest of the animal.
No,
there's 10% of the father that you can't
eat. It's not edible. So when he has
offspring, that 10% runs through the
entire body. There's a little bit of it
everywhere.
And then he then he then he answered the
question himself.
Of course, the father zer goes
everywhere to all legs, to all stakes,
everywhere. There's everywhere. And I'll
prove it to you.
Does it make sense that that animal
that's blind, it's going to have a
offspring that's blind? In other words,
it's its deficiency is going to go
exactly to the to the baby. No.
And a and a one that has chopped off
legs, it's going to give birth a chopped
off leg. Does it make sense that just
because the father doesn't have legs,
the the son is going to be born without
legs?
Certainly
his deficiency spreads to the whole
body.
So this is the question.
Every time you have offspring, a cow has
offspring
in
in creating the the baby, there's a
little bit of and a little bit of dam
is how do you every animal has and dam
in it. So it's giving over to create the
baby the offspring. But you allow to eat
it.
So over here, yes, there's a little bit
of a leg that's to eat and that he's
creating the offspring with a bad leg,
but it doesn't matter. You eat it.
Maybe we ignore two. This is This is M
is super interest to me. Two, we could
ignore.
But once you add a third one to the mix,
because now we have also involved that
you don't do maybe, maybe you can say
such a thing. Says, "Wait a minute.
There's no such thing a three because
regardless how you go, you're never
going to get the three either. Mayor,
we're going to see later on. Yeah, I
agree that every animal when they're
created, they're created with a little
bit of isra fat and a little bit of
blood. Fine.
Because according to once a animal is
viable in the ninth month, let's say it
goes through a full pregnancy, there's
no there's no bakua. You're not allowed
to eat it without. So there's no this
whole hand out hand in is not important.
Why? Because even if it sticks a hand
out, it doesn't become because anyway
you have to sh the entire animal. It's
not
accord
anyway is awesome.
There's no problem of you don't have
three and according to everybody you
don't have three. So that that that idea
that you want to say that the difference
between two is three doesn't exist.
We don't care about the the the the what
the father the father had
but in the question is a little
different.
Can you drink from the milk of a basa?
You have a basa and she has milk.
We never look at milk as although it's
slightly it's
crazy.
So saying look this is also you're going
to you're going to scratch your head
here. The reason why perhaps you're
allowed to drink milk even though it's
because eventually you could sh this
animal it will be you could shed. So it
kind of lightens the the is of the of
the milk and that's why you let it drink
it. But this animal who's
bas you can never do to it. There's no
way out of it.
Bubar
if he took a piece of the fetus and lift
it inside the fetus. He took a knife cut
its leg off while it's in Europe. Today
we know how to do it. There's surgeries
like that etc.
How do you know that it's awesome?
Listen to this. How do you know the the
whole idea of of um of a that you eat
that you eat the leg that's inside? It
says
of look at this beautiful chart. Kobe
Kobe did this.
He took this chart
and he did this. You read it like this.
Every animal that's in animals
within animals.
Oh, if you tell me that every animal
that's inside another animal, you're
allowed to you're allowed to eat. So, we
have something called tumor. Tamura is
the is if you have a little carbon and
you want to trade it up to a bigger
carbon and you say this should be
instead of this is 100% awesome.
>> And the second one becomes exactly like
the first one. It works but what you did
is also
now the question is
it says that you cannot do this this
idea doesn't work on a on a fetus on a
baby inside a stomach
>> but why it's a it's considered a bea but
it says behema and it's a so we're just
going to say a bunch of words here don't
get confused the point is the only way
to do tumor is on a whole animal one
whole animal like in this picture one
whole animal to another animal But parts
of an animal, the fetus of an animal on
both directions, whether you're using
you're using the
the the kadesh yet. You're saying that
that uh its fetus or its leg that
doesn't work or the the one on the left,
the one on the right, both that's all
the is saying now.
So the first one is always the part the
one on the right the the the animals
legs in the of
and not that's a fetus to the limbs of
kachum. It has to be full animals. You
can't you can't exchange limbs for limbs
or limbs for a fetus. Why? Because it's
a uber. It's not a full animal.
take the the the the limbs and the in a
whole animal of
the bottom line is it doesn't work. This
thing doesn't work to a fetus. Why not?
It's a Oh, you're right. So, let's do
something else.
It says in the so it's extra. It comes
to include even the fetus you allow to
eat.
How come the own mother animal when you
cut part of her kidney, you cut the the
spleen, you're not allowed to eat it
after the is considered why
if you do it to the fetus, it's okay.
If you do its own the mother's kidney,
you cut it inside her batting and leave
it in there. The of the mother doesn't
help to her her own kidney
that when she is whole then you're
allowed to eat everything everything
inside of her but once it's missing then
not
a cow and all of a sudden it comes out
that we had also we'll have it soon a
woman gives birth to funny shaped things
like a shoe one of them is a bird the
cow gave birth to something that looks
like a pigeon I
If you find some sort of bird looking
type of thing, eat it.
The bird doesn't have split hooves and
you need split hooves.
The the the camel the famous camel guy.
>> Yeah, I just did. I just did. I said the
video is sponsored by uh
how come the camel that has these split
hooves is mut. You said if it's in the
mother's stomach, you allow to eat it.
According to you, it has to have
processes. It has it has to have split
hooves. This the second word on the
it has to have a paras. And this this
pigeon doesn't have a paras. It has the
pigeon feet.
No, let's go back to Kobe's how Kobe did
the over there. My friends of
you allowed to eat an animal that's
inside animal.
He had a question. If so, how come you
can't do with a fetus with a baby in the
stomach?
What's
I know we don't have time. We got to see
this though for the new people.
Bunch of new people that didn't see
this. Mice is when you have a bunch of
animals, you put them a bunch of new
babies. Easy to put them. You let them
go out of the pen and you count 10. The
10th one you give it a red dot. That
10th one, every 10 bring to your line.
I didn't speed it up. Yeah. Wow. It is
late.
And then when he gets all the way to
number 10, what does he do? Remember dot
and that becomes my
Yeah. Yeah. Oh, this part. Okay. So,
there's a connection between what's the
connection, everybody? I'm going to show
you something you might not have noticed
when you're learning this because the
says
and then it says
talking about so are connected.
If you look at the purple in the B, it
says
anyone that walks through that gate over
there gets the thing. But you have to
walk. It can't be a limb. It can't be a
fetus.
Okay. So, I'm learning from to that's
why
nothing to do with that. You're right.
Our tells us anything inside animal
you're allowed to eat. It's considered
an animal. But there's a special
positive that we learned from from
Meister that you can't for for tomorrow
you can't use something that that that's
a or a fetus. And how do you know that
this goes according to that what that
you can't you can't do with with that
goes according to this
beautiful check this out. Either we go
like on the left or like on the right. A
guy says this leg of this animal
>> just a leg the entire thing becomes
>> and then you say according to only the
foot becomes
now take that idea and use it over here
also it's not
so when you say a little part of it
becomes
the leg then the whole thing becomes
says who is he talking about two
if he's talking to
they don't even hold it that they don't
hold that if you say one foot it spreads
to the whole to the whole animal
I would think that you you make one part
of the animal the the foot you make it
the whole animal become
Not the whole thing becomes
you say oh so it's not it's only the leg
so so just let it go loose it should be
regular no
remains so what do you do when you have
the 90% is not just it front leg is what
do you do with it okay so what do you do
sell it to somebody else that needs
he'll pay for it and now the entire
thing becomes an minus its front leg
that was already an which the discusses
somewhere else. So then he didn't bring
a whole he brought a 95%. The other leg
is somebody else's. Okay.
And the money that you pay for it goes
out.
But besides the the 10% of the front leg
so they don't hold then if a person does
one leg the whole spreads to the rest of
the animal. The the leg remains but not
the rest.
there and this is you ask me how do I
know here it is
how do you know that no it spreads to
the entire thing so we want to say it
spread to the entire animal
says
we just said that if it goes to one foot
it doesn't it doesn't uh spread to the
rest of the animal
here here's here's the the source of
himself.
He wasn't talking about he was saying I
myself hold like this.
Have a wonderful day.
[music]
>> Merit the of spreading Torah throughout
the world. Sponsor Ashir today.
mdysponsor.com [music] or sponsor
atmop.com.