CHAZARAH - Chullin Daf 100 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky

[music] We learned in the Mishna that is remind first of all what's a if you just started this people that started yesterday. So we'll just show this little clip. Why not? Ganosha in the right back thigh running down the entire leg. There's a white nerve called the sciatic nerve. That's it right over there. That's the ganosha. Okay, that's the girosha. That's to eat. And if you cook it with other giddim, this is not such a great picture, but that's what we're discussing. Cooking with other. Let's say you cooked the ganache with other senus. So if you could tell which which one it is, you recognize it. You're a professional. So you pull it out, you eat the rest. But if you cannot tell which one is the aller ask the let me just show you this just to remind the concept of is in the it says you always go by the majority by one percent more whatever it is one fraction of percent as long as it's a little bit more that's the that's the majority and most of the pot is full of senus that are mut to eat. Why is it a problem to eat to get anusha when it's cooked with other senus? So we're going to see three answers. Let me show you all three answers in one shot. There's no bar with a with a g because it's a barrier. When you take the entire gid from top to bottom is its own entity. You can't be an entity. It's a dominion. It's something that you count. It's sold as a individ as as as a number. You say one, two, I'm selling you two, three and it's it's something that you would serve as is something that's you serve as is not so much to get. These are things that there's no something that's like a piece of we'll see like a cheetah, a leopard or a pineapple in there is a dish of minion. They sell it for $25 a pineapple. You know, here it's $1.99 a jewel, right? There's a stroll. Pineapple is like one of the most coveted items you could buy. People take out mortgages on their home to buy pineapple. So, terrace number one is on top of the first words briosi since this giranha is an entity. So an entity is not bottle. So if you have a piece of nea in a pot. So if you recognize it, you pull it out the it makes the rest of the potser when it gives off a flavor. What is that called when it gives off a flavor of >> nice and nice and tast the same question all over again. If you don't recognize the piece of na the piece of tra in your p the whole p is also ask the says how come the piece of tra doesn't become so before we look inside remor says this idea that lemon anything that you count is is not bottle and there's a is what he meant did he mean anything that you only count like diamonds when you buy a diamond you always count the diamond you sell you sell one diamond you sell two diamonds three diamonds you never give one freebie it's always individual and I when you buy a pineapple it's always one at a time he'll never throw in one for free if you buy cashews they'll throw in a few so forget the words forget remembering what this means. I don't I can't remember it. Maybe you guys could. Means usually, but sometimes not. Okay. So over here you have a piece of ana. Sometimes you sell it by the pound. Sometimes you sell it individual pieces. Sometimes like this, some like that. Fine. So therefore it's can't be bottle. You're asking me how come there's no because says anything that sometimes you count as individual pieces sometimes you sell it as individual pieces you can't be it's too the whole over here is the whole point is something that's you can't be a diamond is so important so you can't you can't it doesn't it doesn't you can't how do you say can nullify it with a majority is a isash entity is oh is the only time food or these kind of items you can't nullify it you can't be mat is when it's the when you only sell it as individual things but if sometimes you sell it and you give a freebie you sell it in in piles whatever then you could be mat so the question is how come a piece of meat that's an avail you can't A piece of meat is not something you only sell individually. Some you sell it individually. Some says it's what do we call that? It's a piece. Sometimes you give it you could give it to a guest as is. It's not the battle. So we just saw the three things here. Let's do let's do a review on all three things that are not. You have the birya an entity. you have it's doesn't mean sometimes you sell it as individual sometimes you don't or only that's a thing that you won't be right or finally we have a piece that's enough to serve on the shabas table to a guest or in the weekday to a guest that's so now the says I need both of these cases In our Mishna, we had one case of a gidd that fell into a pat. If you recognize it, great. You can eat the rest. You don't recognize you can't eat the whole p. And we had another case. You had a piece of trao or a piece of tummy fish that fell into a pot. If you recognize it, great. you it depends on if you don't recognize you can't eat the whole pot you're talking about the entire entity of the gid from top to bottom but a piece is not an entire entity it's a piece of a steak it's a piece of an animal so may maybe it should be if I only say the word of a piece of meat like a steak it's something you give to your guest, but it's not something you give your guest to get. So should be says something that Rav took offense to. He didn't like this. What did he say? In other words, that if you have a piece of if it doesn't give enough flavor, in other words, unless it gives enough flavor that it takes over the whole thing, the the flavor of everything of the of the the juices and the pieces and everything. So Rav didn't like this and he put a somebody to give a dr to to to yell out to the to the public what since it gave flavor to one other piece. The second piece itself is like the first piece and then it makes all the other pieces. If you have any questions, the gumar is going to address all your questions. If you have a piece of McDonald's meat and there's a piece of kosher meat, so the McDonald's goes into the kosher piece and the other second piece becomes an avail. Now that McDonald's second piece makes everything else in the pot tra that's what that's what Rabbi um Rav said this is ra argues on he says it's not true that the whole you have to it's no once there's a second piece in there that second piece becomes an aa and it and it helps the first piece as well is going to explain more here [snorts] I brought some I go to explain here. This is piece number one. You can see one and this is piece number two. This is kosher. This is kosher piece and this is tra. And then when it touches when this red trafe piece touches the green piece, it becomes tra. So now you have two pieces. Where is it? Two. One and two. I don't know if you could see. Yeah, you can see. Okay. One and two. So it says, "And then you have all these kosher pieces. Then you drop them in here. All these green pieces become red." I ask the Gammoro, "I don't understand something." And the way Rashi explains it is, "Do you have a cup? Does anybody have an empty cup that the didn't Oh, here we go." Rashi explains that this red piece number one was in a pot together with this and therefore when you take the two pieces out you have these two you have two pieces two red pieces nothing to do with another path first you made piece number two completely tray how by cooking it with piece number one as the gar I don't understand why does Rav say that you need two pieces what if you only add. What if you only had one piece, the original piece, and you put it in? Whoa. You put it in to here. What's going to happen? According to that says, when you have it's the same item throughout, it's all Lego. It's all meat. So, if it's all meat, what's going to happen? You can't be mat. this red piece, all the green is going to become red. You don't need a second piece as the Gar, why do you need a second piece? One piece is going to ruin everything because since they're all the same, it's not potatoes and meat. It's all meat and all meat you can never be according to. So, one piece that went in here is enough. Why does he say that you need two pieces? Who's going according to it? He goes like, you know, says that when you put one piece of tra meat into a whole pot of kosher meat, all the pieces of kosher meat could never make the non-cooser piece kosher. Why? Because the same type. So why do you have to say that piece number one [clears throat] made peace number two even if without this piece number two all you have is piece number one and piece number one went into a bunch of other pieces and you're not going to see they're not red and green they're all they all look like meat so now the red original red piece can never become but and this whole pot becomes also why did you tell me there's two pieces of head. Answer number one is very good. What happened was piece number one touch piece number two. They cook together. So now piece number two is just like piece number one. Tra and now he got rid of piece number one. He's gone. Now we're dealing with piece number two only. Says Rav, piece number two, you're right. can make the all the green stuff completely tray because it got the tuma from piece number one. So piece number two is like piece number one and it made all the green tummy. That's what's what's going on here. It's possible that he did not get rid of the first piece. We're still dealing with two pieces. He has two pieces called them. They didn't get rid of one. But so now let's pretend that these green guys are not meat. They're all potatoes. These green guys are potatoes. Now if I introduce all these potatoes and the meat together. So what do you have here? You have min. You have two red pieces of meat or two pieces of meat. They're not red. Two pieces of meat and a bunch of potatoes. But that's a different that's something else. Potatoes is different than meat. So what I'm going to do is I have to take get rid of piece number two. That's the law. The law is, the rule is that if I have two different things, I have potatoes and meat, I'm going to pretend that whatever's similar to the trafe, in other words, the meat, anything else that's resembles the trafe, which is meat, we're going to get rid of him. So, what resembles the meat? The second piece, get rid of him. So, now you have only one piece in the mixture cuz you pretend you got rid of piece number two. And look, you have a row. You have 60 greens. Pretend these are 60 potatoes. 60 potatoes overcome the one red piece of meat. And what happens? It's kosher. But now that Raph said that this piece was cooked together with the other piece, so now it's very pant. When you have one piece of Lego, how many pieces of potato do you need to overcome it? >> 60. And what if you have two pieces? Right? >> You need 120 pieces. So, that's what Rav said. Raph said that now you're in trouble because piece number one, touch piece number two, and they cook together. So, now you have two pieces. Two pieces in this mixture right over here is not going to work. You don't have enough to That's it. That's all he said. That you you asked me. What was the question? You asked me [clears throat] why did he Raph say that piece number one touch piece number two? What difference does it make? Piece number one by itself when it goes into the mixture ruins the whole mixture. Why? Cuz it's the same type of thing. No, it wouldn't ruin the mixture because [clears throat] one piece by itself would be overcome by the 60 potatoes in here. Two pieces. That's why Raf says it's two pieces and two pieces cannot be overcome by the 60. They could only be overcome by 120. So let's see inside. [clears throat] So when you have two pieces of meat and a bunch of potatoes in the same pot, you're going to get rid of potato number two. You're only going to consider the tray potato. Potato number one. I I mean piece of meat number one. You're going to get rid of piece number two. And then what are you going to have? You're going to have 60 potatoes and one piece of tray meat. And the 60 potatoes are going to overcome the the piece of meat. You have two you have you have potatoes is potatoes and two pieces of meat. Anytime you have two pieces of meat and a bunch of potatoes, get rid of the piece of meat number two and all you have is piece number one and the potatoes are going to overcome it and be says and then you have to continue says but in our case meat number one touch meat number two. So you can't get rid of it. It's keto. You just put two tray pieces of meat into [snorts] the pot and the pot only has 60 potatoes. So 60 potatoes is not enough to get to overcome two pieces of meat. You need 120 potatoes, says the Mishna. Now we have easy stuff. And and also sort of only applies to a kosher animal, not not to a lion. If you eat the lions says the Even if you eat the of a lion, how do I know? Look, he says he brings the happened byious. Look at it because of what happened doesn't eat. So it was already user at the time of Islam. Oh you see precedes the in other words is saying the waser on all animals. There was no such thing as a non-cooser animal in the time of Yaku. Lions were kosher. Everything was kosher. You're allowed to eat lion. It's only later on that the Tory said you can't eat a lion. So it makes sense even because that was first. Nope. You're you're misunderstanding the didn't happen at time wrote the reason why made iter and he put it in its place says how could hold that the applies itself on top of a cuz look right now today a lion is created it it it it's formed forms in its mother's stomach and only afterwards the ginh applies itself which the is going to talk about but let's say that's what happens so you have a iser applying itself on top of another is and we know that is not on is once you have one is you can't apply another is to it this is only for the people that haven't been with the for very There's a special, right? Every single animal has every animal that's not is a whether it's a cat, a dog, a cow, a kosher animal, non if they die without the a lion, an elephant, all besides a chicken and a kosher bird. They do not have tuma. What do they have when you consume it in your mouth? When it goes down your throat, then you become tummy. Not only that, all your clothing become tummy. Roadkill. In other words, it wasn't shafted. It's in a balo. Then it becomes stomach when it goes down his throat. What? You didn't see this one before? >> Okay. So, maybe this should apply also to to owls and eagles and all non-culture birds. No, only something that has of eating it because of why can't you eat a a non-coosher bird? Because it's a tummy bird. The tells you not to eat a tummy bird. When a person eats a dead eagle, what is the only one is of eating a non-coosher bird that the is of eating an aa and when it comes to it has to be something that has on it and not oh so then the question is how come the is of goes on top of the is of perhaps we passing Remember yesterday we the Gimar Paskkins that a a GI doesn't have flavor. So if it doesn't have flavor and it comes from a non-cooser bird or animal. You're not on eating non-coosher. You only non-coosher when it's food when it tastes. But if something doesn't have a taste like the bone of a of a bird, you're not when you eat it unless it has bone marrow or something. But the bone itself, you're not. If it's just a senue, you're not if you eat a senue of a non-coosher animal. That's what that's even though it doesn't have any flavor and it's not meat and it's not it's not you're not over on eating meat yet you are according to even though it's a Tommy animal and in a non-coosher animal when you eat you're only one is not an isser of a animal because it has no flavor Does really hold that? I'll prove to you that he holds that has a flavor. If it has a flavor, then when you eat it from a non-coosher animal, you should be two. One for eating a non-coosher animal and one for eating a gash. And the question is, how's the is of apply itself to the isur of the meat? What do you guys say? How could the is of apply itself to the isur of non-cooser meat? How's it possible when they happen when it happens simultaneously when the meet happen together. So we'll talk about that and the question is how do you have and of animal together you're right has flavor and therefore there's of eating a non-coosher animal also the since the is also in the mother's stomach. That means when the animals created in the mother's stomach, when it forms, the same moment that it forms and it becomes to eat, that's the moment that it becomes to eat to get as well. And therefore, it's possible to have two isim on one on one thing. Why? Because when the two is form simultaneously, then for two on each one. What's the problem? The problem is if the iser of eating this tra meat happened first and two months later the isha happened second how how is that possible if the g only formed later on on the fetus but first the meat formed then the formed then you wouldn't be why because in one is cannot apply itself the second is the of of is in you grow in when the animal [clears throat] is pregnant still when when it's still a baby the of eating animal and the happen simultaneously how could you even say that this is applies when the animals in the stomach but says straight out we're talking about says straight out that the we had the does not apply itself to a baby in its mother's stomach. Dess which was 11 days ago. Morty, you were here. No, you remember that all the way in the beginning. >> Yes, exactly. The It's a great time to start. But the here in the he holds that you're allowed to eat the the the the fats the user fats of a regular animal you're allowed to eat of the benqua says that is all set in by a different thing by what's awa kosher animal only by a kosher animal you sh the mother you don't have to you don't have to shuck the baby we're talking about here we're talking out the the baby. So anything in the baby after you sh the mother you're allowed to eat everything. What does it mean? Everything the fat and even the that's not true. That only applies to animal but not animal. How could you try to answer me that the and the is of eating the animal happen simultaneously on a tummy animal? How's it possible? But you have another somebody that said he's he made a nether he'll never or not never for at least 30 days he won't drink wine he won't become if he's over in middle of his 30 days day 15 he goes to funeral what happens start over again so it says when do you start over here we go check this out lit long time no He gives him shamik and that's it. He's done. He has to start all over again. Right? Let's say he was he accepted upon himself in his ears for 3 years and 4 days before the three years are over he touches a dead person. Let's do all three years over again. Now, look how long his hair is. He's been in for a while, not three days. This is when the has to shave his head and start all over again. And then it says here's the question. If in this case right over here when he touches a full dead person if to start over on a little kaz so certainly on a a full human being you remember we had this when you were already here same question we're doing now and you learn to see that a lot of shas is repeated a lot of suggest a lot of ideas and we asked If a person has to restart everything on a small piece like certainly a full human being. So what what does answer what it means is we're talking about a nafl a miscarriage which he didn't have his meat was not connected to the senus. What's the point of the gimmar here? That you see that senus are formed later on in the pregnancy. They're not formed on day one. Meat is formed on day one. Senus come later on. So is sorry. What comes first? The meat. The is for you to eat the meat comes first. You're telling me the meat and senus happen the same day. It's not true. Meat. You see over here there's a concept called the nafl and that's what the is talking about over there that's the meat and the came later on comes later on why why so the question is why is it that the is of could apply itself afterwards on top of the is of eating the meat with a concept called So once you have one answer, you can't you can't give it in a second. Says yes you could sometimes since it's so extreme. When did this story happen by what was he Jewish? What was he? He's a Benoyak. Jews only happened later on by by Matra. Anybody before Matra was not Jewish. was it's hard to understand like we're more Jewish but that's how it is meaning you see from that the was all the way from who's a and it's still and not and there was not even the the idea of non-cooser meat. That's why the is of is so severe. And because it's so severe, it could apply itself on top of a is that's less severe. When do you say that one is doesn't apply itself on another when they're equal? But when there's room, so to speak, for the second is to go on top. Why? Because it's a more severe. So could the second one could apply itself to the first one. Have a wonderful day. Have a good v. Have a good chabas wherever you are. Thank you for coming. >> Merit the of spreading Torah throughout the world. Sponsor a shir today. mdysponsor.com or sponsor at mdyop.com.