Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Menachos Daf 88
22 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, Pesachim, acharon
shel Pesach is daf and we're picking it
up with a Mishnah on peh zayin amud bet.
So, the last Mishnah talked about the
solid measurements. Now we got the
liquid measurements. As it says in the
Mishnah, sheva midos shelach hayu
b'Mikdash. There were seven different
kinds of measures in the Beis Hamikdash
and they were hin v'chatzi hin,
v'shlishis hin, u'revi'is hin. And the
next Mishnah later on in today's daf is
going to break down exactly why they
were all used. Continues the list, lug,
v'chatzi lug, u'revi'is lug. Rabbi
Eliezer bar Rabbi Tzadok the gomer,
shnosays hayu b'hin. They didn't have
lots of different little kelim for these
different fractions of hins, but rather
they had markers on the single hin keli.
So, ad kan l'par, until this line it's
going to be the nesachim that would come
along with the par carbon. V'ad kan
l'ayil, likewise for the ayil b'ad kan
l'keves. Rabbi Shimon omer, lo haya sham
hin. They didn't have a hin in the Beis
Hamikdash because v'chima haya hin
meshamesh? What point would there be?
There was no carbon that would require a
hin because it was only b'shas Moshe
Rabbenu to use the hin of shemen when
they made the shemen hamishcha. But
since that shemen remained through all
the dayrus al pinays, so there was no
need to ever create that shemen again
and therefore they didn't need the
measurement of the hin according to
Rabbi Shimon. Ela, midah y'sayrah shel
lug u'mechtza haya sham. There was
another keli of a lug u'mechtza. That's
how you got to the number seven of
different liquid measurements. Sheb'haya
mayid l'minchas kayin godol for his
minchas kavitin. You needed a lug
u'mechtza b'boker and a lug u'mechtza
b'vein ha'arbaim. Tanna Rabbanan in the
braisa says, sheva midos shelach hayu
b'Mikdash. There were seven different
measurements, revi'is lug, chatzi lug,
v'lug, u'revi'is hin, v'shlishis hin,
v'chatzi hin, v'hin. That's all divrei
Rabbi Yehudah. But Rabbi Meir omer the
other direction, hin, v'chatzi hin,
v'shlishis hin, u'revi'is hin. V'lug,
v'chatzi lug, u'revi'is lug. Basically
it's the same list in the opposite
order. But Rabbi Shimon omer, lo haya
sham hin as we said because v'chima haya
hin meshamesh? Moving over to amud alef,
I don't need it for any reason because
they weren't making the shemen hamishcha
anymore. But as me avi tachtiv, what
would I use to complete the list of
seven different kelim? Ela, midah
y'sayrah shel lug u'mechtza haya sham.
Sheb'haya mayid l'chavitei kayin.
he used to split his three
and that
half in the morning and half in the
afternoon.
They asked
you already had a
Kayli
to have a one and a half measuring tool
you could do it in two parts with a and
a full lug.
After
even according to you
you shouldn't need to have to a
because
you have a quarter lug
so you could just double the
to create a
and
if it's used for one purpose you don't
use it for another purpose skipping the
parentheses my
cuz it's the same list of seven they're
only just going in ascending or
descending order of size
there is actually enough
it's a little bit extra that goes above
the rim of the Kayli cuz as explains
when you overfill a Kayli if you quickly
catch it in the next Kayli and pour it
out immediately you can actually get
more substance so
the
next Kayli that that little extra amount
becomes
because that little
aspect is actually part of the sheer and
therefore you can use it as part of the
sheer from
not that it's but that it is
and therefore
it was given a of a lug as a measurement
only
share shots up to Kayli make the so that
all the other could also have this extra
amount cuz as explains when you pour
from a smaller Kayli into a larger Kayli
for example the lug into the lug the
extra little amount from the smaller
Kayli will now transfer into the bigger
Kayli rather than landing on the ground
because the receiving Kayli is the
larger one it can hold both so that's
why the list of ascending or descending
actually matters for the
but
according to who lists the order of the
Kaylum in descending order from the
biggest ones to the smallest ones
because of Berutzei Midas Lane and
Scotch you and therefore the Hin Yov Le
Rachman Le Misha the Berutzei gave Misha
Benu a Hin the Omer lay Shayer Bahod the
Konafki Berutzei make the other
Hishbonas using this Hin which is the
largest measurement and Misha Benu's job
is to figure out the half Hin the third
of the Hin etc. So therefore when you're
pouring from the larger Kali into the
smaller Kali okay that little extra of
Berutzei Midas is now going to fall out
of the Kali on the ground because it's
not going to transfer into the smaller
Kali. So according to the mayor you
don't Hishbon Berutzei Midas as part of
what becomes Kadish. Abaya Omer a
different shot in the Mahlikas the Kuli
Alma Berutzei Hamidas he could be now in
the Scotch you everybody's mask of it is
in the Scotch you vehicle memory in the
Scotch you and you could also say it's
not in the Scotch you there is no
Mahlikas about that but what are they
talking arguing about? The Hacham Ben
Maleem Kamiflik the word Maleem to fill
it up Mandumer Mil Mal Le Mata like
Remero holds that you go from the bigger
Kali down to the smaller Kali in the
list Kosover Maleem Sheli Haser Sheli
Eiser it's got to be exact amount not to
add or not to make it any less and
that's why in order to accomplish that
you start with the biggest Hin
measurement as the model for all the
others. So you pour into smaller and
smaller Kalim to get the exact
measurement. Umandumer Mil Mata Le Mala
but according to the Bihuda holds you go
into the bigger Kalim Maleem Sheli Haser
when you say the word Maleem you got to
fill it mean you can't have any less.
Avul Eiser Maleem Karina Bay but if you
add a little bit extra cuz there's now
room in the newer Kali that will still
be called a Kiam of Maleem and therefore
that's why you start with the smaller
quarter of a lug as the beginning basis
for all the other Shirim. Omer Mar Rebbi
Shimon Omer Lo Hoya Sham Hin there was
no Hin in the Bas Hamikdash at all cuz
there was no purpose for such a
measurement anymore. Facting of ours the
point Shaper Kamar Lehu Rebbi Shimon Le
Rabbanan why would the Rabbanan even
include the Hin in the first place? To
which the Kamar says the Rabbanan have a
Hin the oven Misha Le Shaman Amisha that
was the Hin that Misha had made for the
Shaman Amisha the Shaman Zais Hin. So
Mair Savor according to Rebbi Shimon
Kivin Dil Dairus Le Vitsark since it was
never needed after that point Le Fisha
Hu Davida Ve Ignaz so Misha Benu made it
for one time use and then he was Ganaiz
that Kali. Ve Eda Kivin Da Hava Hava
according to Rebbi Huda or Rebbi Mair
since there was such a measurement so
they never got rid of it was
in and therefore it's one of the Kaylim
now in the base of Migdash. Amar Mar,
"Pes me avi tachdav." What replaced,
according to Rebbe Shimon, in the list
of seven, the Hin? Prak the Gemara, "Le
saggi de le mayil." Why do we have to
replace it at all? Maybe there's only
six. Prak the Gemara, "Kedo amar Ravina,
kamiri sh'tei smichos b'tzibbur." There
was a mesorah that there's no more than
two matzos and more smichos required for
a carbon tzibbur, which is a reference
to the par halim dovar and the se'ir
la'azazel on Yom Kippur. So, "Hachi nami
kamiri d'sheva middos sh'lo chiyav
Migdash." There's a mesorah on the
number seven. So, no one wants to
dispute that idea. So, if Rebbe Shimon
is saying there was no Hin in the base
of Migdash, he got to come up with
something else to be mashlim the number
seven. Rebbe Elazar b'Rebbe Tzadok amar,
"Sh'nei s'ais chiyav b'Hin." They didn't
have different Kaylim. They had one
Kayli of the Hin with lots of little
measuring markers on there. "Ayin v'less
l'sheva middos." But, there was a
mesorah that there were seven different
measurements in the base of Migdash. To
which the Gemara says, "Less lay."
"V'hachi nami." According to him, there
was no such mesorah. And therefore,
according to him, you could just get
away with the largest Kayli with the Hin
with little marking lines all over it.
"Or vi bei s'aim a different teretz."
"My sheva middos" it just means "sheva
mididos" seven different distinct
measurements, but not seven different
Kaylim. Okay, so we have the list from
the last Mishnah. Now, this Mishnah is
going to tell us what the each got used
for. "Revi'is mayim hayisa meshames." A
revi'is, which is a quarter of a lug,
what was its purpose? And the answer is,
"Revi'is mayim l'metzora." That's how
much water you need for the process of
the taharas metzora. "U'revi'is shemen
l'nazir." And you also need a revi'is of
shemen for the lechem that the nazir
brings at the end of his nezirus.
"Chatzi lug mayim hayisa meshames." What
was that for? That was for chatzi lug
mayim l'meisita. That's where they
dissolve the Shem Hashem as part of the
process of the meisita. "Chatzi lug
shemen l'teida." You need a chatzi lug
for the 30 lechem of matzah. That's not
the schameitz, that's brought with the
carbon teida. "U'lug hayisa meshames
l'chol hamenachos." And the full lug,
that was used for all the carbon
menachos. "Afilu mincha shel shishim
isarin." Even a mincha that had 60
isarin of flour, "Nosein lo shishim
lug." You would just multiply that
single lug 60 times. Rebbe Eliezer ben
Yaakov amar, "Afilu mincha shel shishim
isarin ein lo ela lug." Even if there
was a huge mincha with 60 isarin of
flour, it only gets one lug of the
shemen. "Shenemar
shall the pair. Why do I need a Kelly
for Shisha Logan? That's Dr. for the
Mincha and then the second that would
accompany a carbon of a pair where are
ball
with
the Mincha and the second for the island
respectively.
Why would I need a three and a half log
Kelly for Shaman? That's Dr. for the
Minera and
because you need
Dr. Gamora you also have a
Dr. had the following Kasha reviews
Lamar. What do I need a review is for? I
got a big problem with the review is
measurement for Dr. Because our mission
suggested you needed either for the
Mayan for the mid-seasons or for the
shaman for the of the Nazar. But neither
one of these things would need a review
is all you take
because
turning over to
it's outside the I mean the mid-seasons
there's a difficult rush here because
rush he says
how do you call my
Nickner
is a difficult question why rush he
would say Nickner because the
mid-seasons is not just by Nickner. He's
outside the whole all together. And the
and maybe you want to tell me the review
is is used for the Nazar which was the
other thing the mission had said. The
Nazar is all who the Kodesh
gets its only with the
of the island brings not before that
point. So you wouldn't need to have any
that go from a
with the review is the shaman. All my
lady
you know what I need the review is for
Shabo my dealer coin Golem review is
shaman
you needed that review is for each one
of the
of those
because there were 12 every morning. So
you need one and a half login for all
six different comes out. It's a review
is of shaman per loaf. Now
if that's the case why doesn't it say so
in the mission and there's an
interesting mission here that says that
he had forgotten this until he was
reminded by later. And even though we're
about to read the Gamora that was very
masculine and he's going to praise
but once the
new the mission is he wasn't going to
change them. So very similar idea that
the first writes about
because once people knew the of these
missions and they memorize them we're
not messing with them. Better to figure
out the changes and missing parts later.
As we said is masculine
as Dr. Gamora said about here. "Me'eretz
merchaq ish atzasi." That Rebbe Hiyya,
who came to Eretz Yisrael from far away,
he was the man. Then the Mishnah said,
"Hatzi lug ma'ayan meshamesh." We said
the hatzi lug is for the meiseisa, and
hatzi lug shemen for the lachmei teida.
"Yosef, Rebbe, vecha
"Hatzi lug l'man nimshach." What's it
negeia the hatzi lug? "Eis seisa
d'chichun hu d'matzliach k'dushei." Is
this water that is chulin that now needs
to be kodesh that you would need to have
it come from a kli shareis? It's not
true. It's already kodesh to begin with
cuz mayim kodeshim k'siv. It's coming
from the kiyor already in the Beis
Hamikdash. So it doesn't need noch
k'dusha. And any teida, if you're
telling me you need to have the hatzi
lug to be makdish that oil for the
lachmei teida, "Lachmei teida b'shchitas
teida hu d'kajei." How does the lachmei
teida become kodesh? All you do is the
shchita of the korban itself, not before
that. So why do I need to have this
keili? "Amar lei Rebbe Shimon bar Rebbe,
"Sh'bo haya machaliq hatzi lug shemen
l'chol ner ner." You know why we need
the hatzi lug? For each and every
respective ner of the menorah. Teisa is
coming up on a mena of different maskil
hatzi. What's the No, why do I need to
be makdish the shemen that would go into
the menorah? The menorah al ein is a kli
shareis. But l'maisa, this suggestion of
Rebbe Shimon bar Rebbe, meaning Rebbe's
son, Rebbe Shimon, made Rebbe very
happy. "Amar lei," he said to his son,
Rebbe Shimon, "Ner Yisrael kach haya."
That's the p'shat. It seems like a pun.
It's the ner Yisrael because we're
talking about using the shemen for the
menorah. "Amar Rebbe Aichanan amar
Rebbe, "Ner she'kavsa." Let's say you
have one of the neros that went out too
early. Before that morning, sometime
during the night time it went out. Now
we're not talking about the ner maaravi,
we're talking about any of the neros.
"Nidasha na'shemen, nidasha na'tzila."
The oil that was in it became filled
with ashes from the wick, or the wick
maybe itself turned into ash. Point is
you couldn't really use the wick
anymore. So keitzad eisah? What do you
do in such a matziv? "Meitiv avan eisav
shemen umadlika." You clean out the ner,
you do the hatava, and you put new oil
in and a new wick, and you light it up.
"Yosef, Rebbe's reish kava k'mei
boilei." "K'shu eisav shemen." When you
put the new oil into this ner that had
gone out, so how much? "K'mida rishona o
k'misha chasra?" Do you put in the same
amount that originally was put in
meaning an entire lug, or you only match
on that which was missing the matter of
oil that's now missing from it
the
original for sure have to put in the
original amount of the full
the
only supposed to be that which was
missing how would you be able to be
exactly how much is missing
you're going to try to measure the
missing amount of oil
then we don't have enough because you
only have seven different measuring
tools not official to but you need many
more that's the case must be you're
going to add the complete of oil to
which really like that from
so
he said about him
but
the MS I know what
so he used that to tell him to say
something nice about him it might not be
near
the
oil
the way it can turn into ashes no good
what do you do now
it's
you put in the original amount of oil of
that you
break
everyone of the
meaning each one of those lamps those
bowls in the
they were
meaning they were bendable they could be
bent downward cleaned up and then
straightened back up kind of amazing to
think about it that way cuz the other
option would be that you can actually
take it apart you could you could just
kind of pop it off and then clean it and
put it back on afterwards but that's not
how it is in these saying it rather they
was flexible because it comes down to
how you understand the
cuz
keep guard the
needing a
which is this big block of gold and
hammering it out that's
if it's going on the and it's and
therefore you can't remove it it's part
of that one
so
to me by a since it needs to have a you
love to
if it's not the fact that it's pliable
and bendable low
they
couldn't possibly clean it properly from
the following how do you clean out the
of the
you
take them off
and you put them into the and
you wipe it with a sponge. You put
the oil and then you light them up. So
clearly they're detachable. So who
did Tanya a different price is
when they were cleaning out the they
would not move it from its place.
That kind of sounds like if you wanted
to move it you would have been able to
move it. I can't be because if that was
the case why don't they just take them
off to clean them.
So must be that physically it couldn't
be detached. So means that the of this
price are going to argue with the who
holds that the nearest were removable.
Who is this sheet that the price is
saying is calling the
Ruby
is the Tanya Ruby
is like a golden plate on top of each
one of the different
as describes each one had a shape of
like a boat. It was like a oblong wide
body where the would go and had a
thinner narrower area where the wick was
put and it was a gold plate that was
like a cover on top of each one of these
different areas to get from going into
it. So
the
when one of them would clean out one of
the they would push the shows of towards
its towards that narrow edge where the
wick would stick out which would expose
the main interior of the and then they
bend down that to clean it out.
And when they would put the into the
they would push that little
back towards the
but they never actually removed the
itself. The ball itself stayed put. So
you see the that price is going to be
from
that's the who looked at the
and the were discussing a really going
like this existing other
the because the price is
they all came from that same big block
of gold.
But the other the tongs these little
spoons they were not from that ribbon
but the
boys
it's all about the
the Tanya the price is says kicker is
tahor ya'aseh oisah l'matai l'minorah
sh'b'nei hakikar." We learn that the
menorah comes from that kikar of gold.
"Min ha'lo rav ish neiroseiha d'ein lo
kol kodesh ba'ah." "Tom l'meimar eis kol
ha'keilim ha'eilah." So "Yachol
sh'neimar ba'av malchoseha
u'machtoseha." All those other keilim
"Tom l'meimar eis
dafka it." Meaning the menorah and its
neiros they were "R' Nechemia." Perfect
gemara. Kasha d'R' Nechemia d'R'
Nechemia. The earlier braysa says that
R' Nechemia holds that the neiros did
not come from the kikar. But here he's
saying the neiros are part of the kikar.
So it's "l'fi mar d'trei tanai v'al liba
d'R' Nechemia." Back to the braysa. "R'
Yehoshua ben Korcha omer min menorah
b'nei hakikar." The menorah itself comes
from the kikar. "D'ein malchoseha
u'machtoseha v'neiroseiha bo'in min
hakikar." "V'eilu ma ani m'kayem kol
ha'keilim ha'eilah?" "She'hayu keilim
shel zahav." That they all would be made
of pure gold, but not that they all had
to come from that same kikar of zahav.
"Frek d'gemara zahav b'heichan ba'i?" I
know that they're gold, I don't need a
drasha for that. "B'asisi neiroseiha
shivah ha'eilu neiroseiha ha'eir al
eiver paneha u'malchoseha u'machtoseha
zahav tahor." So I don't need another
makor to tell me that the keilim have to
be made of gold. So the gemara says,
"L'nitzrachah l'fi neiros." The reason
why R' Yehoshua ben Korcha needed to
have this drasha is to teach you that
the pi neiros, the area where the wick
is put, that also has to be made out of
gold. Because "Al kidei d'chaminah
ha'ilu pi neiros ashchurim mashchei."
But myse that area is going to get
black. So perhaps "a teira choshech
umamein she'yisrael" that it shouldn't
be made out of gold. Moving over to
"Amud Aleph." "V'lo oved zahav kal
d'hu." And you can use it from the
cheaper kind of quality gold because
it's going to get ruined anyway.
"Kamashma lan d'teira says it's got to
be used with the same kind of pure level
of gold." R' Berazner spoke out, I think
it was from the sidrei taharah, an
interesting point that you see that
there's a machlokes tanai'im whether or
not the neiros can be removable from the
menorah. So by you and some of us have
very nice fancy silver menorahs, but we
don't actually put the oil into the
silver. We put it into glass cups that
sit inside of our silver menorah. So one
could l'cheira make the point that maybe
we're not doing the nine mitzvah on our
menorah at all because you're really
putting your ner of Chanukah into a
glass bowl. L'masha, let's say I have a
silver table and you put a bunch of
glass cups on it. You're going to say
that your nine mitzvah of the silver is
negaya? No, it's just a support and a
basis for your glass cups. But clearly,
you see from this Sugya that the menorah
is part of it even if it's detachable.
That's an interesting Nekuda, and that
is that. Okay, folks, we managed to do
it. We got our Daf Yomi done for second
day's Yom Tov. So, B'ezrat Hashem, we'll
see you again Isru Chag.