Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Menachos Daf 62
7 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay. Dam shabas is d. We get to learn
lots more about Tanufa as we pick it up
five lines from the bottom of Tanya. The
puss says by Israel mainly Israel but
how do you know that a g and an also do
anybody who brings it which is a reboot
to include for so is that the
maybe the is only referring to that and
maybe it's coming the bum don't do any
which the says
so the terror is already established
that the bum is already so is coming
both the gum and the nowad how do you do
a mitzvah if there's both an for the bum
and for the kahanim so the following is
the process
the kayen puts his hands under the bum's
hands and they do the tanufa together we
mentioned tyus yesterday about his
potential problem of kita tus suggests
that perhaps it's not really davka that
the hands are underneath the other hands
which is difficult from the garra tyis
springs from rashi later on that the
isim and therefore that's why it won't
be a kata we mention that in kadush says
that it won't
If that's how the terrorist surah of the
mitzvah is done and perhaps just to add
to the mix, Rabbi Gross had another
mahal based on the briskov because the
brisk mad in the Rambamish that it's not
an equal of mitzvah between the bum who
has to do and the kay who has to do.
It's really all about the kayen doing
the but the sura of how is done is by
holding the buser in the hands of the
bum. In other words, the hands of the
bum are like the cle that holds the
buser. So when you the cayenne are
holding the hands of the bum you're
holding the container that holds the
buser but the tanuf is really being done
by the kayen not by the bum. So since
the kay we look at the bum as his hands
being the cle of course it's not a
that's the of how it's done. Okay,
moving over to what's the actual of the
piece.
So you're stacking it. First you put the
and on top of that you put
and whenever there happens to be as part
of that carbon
you'll put the on top of that which is
on top of the where do we find that the
is going to be on top of for some reason
the gar didn't want to include the
carbon and the caronus of noir which
also used in rash. Now my timer going
back to the reason for how the stack is
done. Why do we put the on top of the
so the PK seems to be listing that the
are stacked on top of the but that can't
be the
so you have a that implies the go on
top. Soaya. Now the reason that that
second says the go on top of the that's
because
that puss is talking about that brings
it back from the area in the bas where
they were chopping up the animals and
over there in the are going to be put on
top of the and then he turns it over and
puts it into another kay's hand. But
bashufa those that were on top are now
on the bottom.
It's that first that tells us that are
going to be on top of another says
there's another that seems to say that
the go on top of the
that's talking about the third that once
again when he takes it to go actually be
of it the are once again on top and he
that third
so it's a three process and inami
depending on which part of the process
we're talking about which thing will be
on top is Is it going to be the or is it
going to be the shake? This does seem to
say that will be with three. It has an
implication
in
even brings that based on the that
you're
with three people. You don't need to
wait for a larger crowd to do and this
is also brought in regards to you see
you don't need more than three for
the said
that in reference to the
will do with these
it sounds like that the should put theim
on top of the and not the on top of the
remember the terra says in the alvim
that you put it on top of of the
had the only written that you put it on
top of the
I might have thought that the only go on
that you put them on the
is making it equal and you can't that
one goes on top of the other
the way that we know that you put the on
top of the is because we find it
otherwise there now where do we find
that the go on top of the papu as we
said earlier. So the fact by the kadus
are going to be on top of the kvassim is
going to be number one of four of how we
did this number two.
No, it's not true. The kassim go
actually on top of the
only reason why the terrorists had said
is to be saying these carbonas as
opposed to the other seven that are
brought with that don't require any a
third
the way you're mamm putting them
together not stacking one on top of the
other but you put the between the legs
of the and that's how you do the
So it seems odd, but the way the says
you to do it is by putting these two
things together sticking it in between
the legs of these
king. You wouldn't even do this for a
human king.
It doesn't make sense to put the there.
You put it next to it. That's how you're
putting the next to the
It sounds like one has to be stacked on
the other. of the lur of
when you say the word al doesn't
necessarily mean one on top of another
like a stack but it could be next to it
where do you put the leav next to the on
the not on it
you put the on the and obviously we
don't mean it's on the capyus goes on
the not the paroas heavy when you hang
that paras near the that's called al. So
in the same way that's called al the go
next to the upon him not on the upon him
and therefore it can also be by us the
go with the kayas not on the kadas. Then
the mission talked about the directions
that you do the
we go in all four directions. So we do
the in all four directions to illustrate
Hashem's over the whole world.
We got to save off the bad winds
up and down is to keep away the bad dew.
There's interesting rashi over here but
rashi says
the four different directions which we
never do when we're in shaw. We're
facing east. Have you ever seen anybody
point their lul in the suffs
rashid davka lab davka. So it's
interesting the Russians should actually
pick ris literally and not just say
right left up down forward backward
right and left etc but actually it's
often a draven
mitzvah is called like the mitzvah it's
not the part of the mitzvah but yet
see it's very helpful even though it's
not the part of the mitzvah
lulov the same thing with alulv it's
interesting that there is this
connection between alulv and kachim as
we've mentioned in the past the only
sugis of mitzvah Habobia vera in the
bavi are regarding carbonus namely the
and lula and it could be according to
some you won't have mitzvah by other
things and it could be that's because
those are both a nyanim of ritsui
there's a shyus of lulov as part of an
aida and that's why maybe according to
the bavi mitzvah will only exist by
those kinds of things talks about
matagula that's why I'm saying
specifically bi but there definitely is
a unique connection between lulov and
kumakarakov mleakyak
would first stick the lul out and then
bring it back to himself
And he would say
and he would say out loud seemingly
stick in the eye of the It's
interesting. Was he talking in the
middle of hollow? Isn't that when you
hold the lul and the lul says it's not
really a heik. And he says it's no
different than if you say byris when you
say the to the baby is kay before the
buffen it's not a heik as it's part of
the service. But others bring a from
here that clearly there's an Indian
toul.
But this idea of sticking it to the
sutton
it's not the right thing to do.
Don't start up with the sun. We don't
want the sun trying any harder to make
him do a and lastly we mentioned
yesterday that beautiful in paraglid
about ideas of the and the representing
which in this context we're specifically
talking about the
not only is there a
whole animal you do the with the entire
animal
no It's not the whole animal. It's after
the you only do it with those parts of
the animal
or
how do we look at when you do it through
or through a do we say that when A is
learned from B, we take all the
characteristics of B and apply it back
to A or we can learn from it but we
leave everything in its own context and
only apply what we need to to our A. Now
just like
so too by these
also needed and from this
we learn from it but we leave it alone
meaning we don't bring all the over
but leave it alone in its own context
by these of
meaning the way they were when they were
alive when you did the which is the
entire animal and not just the turning
over a different way to understand the
everybody's mask of and really you
should bring all the over but why say
it's different and you do the whole
animal because
just like the
just like the which we give the
we should do the with whatever is given
to the which is the whole animal so it
really is the same it is
another
it's the actual opposite everybody holds
that you leave it alone and it's only
but why did say it's going to be the
same is because another of so That
reeboy tells us that the sha made su is
going to be done the same way as the
sham. Then the next part of the mission
listed shim who gave us the three
mitzvah that only two of the three
applies to each. We're just going to
quote this part of the now.
There is no
you always do the
but you don't do the
you don't do the after it's and now the
gar is going to give us the potential of
why we would have thought you would do
that third for each one of these
still.
So why don't we do the
will only be done by the not the
which only going to require and not why
don't we say they should have
yet still
which do require
to which we have a or
that can't be more than two of.
And lastly,
why don't we do the after of the which
only requires when it's alive
yet still
that it still needs while it's alive.
We have a special
so there's a special that you don't do
the
because of that's written by the last
if five people bring one carbon
one brings for all of them who doesn't
actually do the herself
the cayenne does it for her which as we
pointed out from Rashi on yesterday's
daf it seems like it's working alikas
which is actually challenging because
anything that you can't do yourself. You
can't make a shik to do it for you. So
how is it shik that we can have for
tufa? There is an important advance to
know over here. It's in Hilus carbonus
test Zion. The advas writes that if a
woman is married her husband should do
the tufa because the husband is the bala
carbon else the kagu and if she's single
she taka doesn't do the tufa but the
application of the advis is making the
bal into the actual carbon is very
important
whether or not
is a
woman who doesn't do by herself. This
says the should just do it for her.
Also,
someone who's not present and they sent
their carbon from far away, the Cayenne
does it for them.