Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Menachos Daf 57
5 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, Zion Monday's Daf picking it
up four lines from the bottom of
so you put the on this which you
obviously can't do. You're not supposed
to allow it to become
and you go on your merry way.
So you might think, hey, I didn't do
anything. All I did was put some on the
issa and then I left. Still
just like you would be in a similar kind
of mat on. It doesn't shock us when on
hashab is if you do a misa that will
result in a mala. Let's say you put a
pot on the stove. All I did was put
something down. I didn't do the cooking.
The fire underneath the pot did the
cooking but that is the surah of the in
other contexts we might look at it as
kind of a groma but by will be and in
the same way
is by the making it result in will also
be the fact
but in a similar case of it wouldn't be
of
moving over
if you put the meat on the coals on
shabas so he
that now your mahape meat, you turn it
over. So therefore, it's going to get
cooked on both sides of the meat. Then
you'll be
But if you don't turn over that meat,
you'll be putter. So you're not really
user for just putting meat on the coals
without doing a misa. So why would rai
say that you're going to be putting the
on the dough just like you would be on
shabas?
It's shabas. The case of putting the on
the
is when you're doing when you're doing a
roasting because it could be it requires
flipping over the meat because that's
its but putting the on the dough is its
misa of being. So allowing the dough to
become is whatever that is if it's
required to be flipping it. So then now
let's go into this some more.
is so
if you tell me it's the as such that if
you don't flip over the meat it would
not ever become cooked obviously you're
not if you never flip it it never gets
cooked what's the case
it's going to get cooked anyway then why
are you not so what's the case of the
requirement of flipping it
if you don't flip it over
one side of the meat will get cooked
likeis
one third cooked cooked, one half
cooked, but it's this lower level of
cooking. And if you are
that is only cooked on one side, that's
not considered the definition of
cooking. That's
if in one area of the meat on one side
of the meat it got cooked the size of a
gregaras that will be enough for Shabas.
It sounds like you're only if it's in
one location, but two or three
says
if you drill any size hole, you'll be
on what's the case where you're for
drilling that hole.
If it's only in one place, that can't be
because you have to be able to do a
constructive
and the single hole is not going to be
enough.
must be we're talking about
because the multiple holes can now be
combined to become one bigger hole and
we see so what do we see from this that
doing the small little insignificant
actions can be combined together to make
it into one more action for the shabas
in the same way if you cook a small
amount of meat in different locations
that should also be enough for the
shabas of the bishop which the says no
there's another way to understand the
mission in shabas
we're talking about where you drilled
the hole only in one location and I you
were assuming that it's not useful
It's the mat of somehow a tip of a key
can be put in there. But the point is
that it is useful and it is going to be
even for the single small hole.
Even if you cook the meat in two or
three different places, you're still
going to be because you can bear those
different areas for the minimum shear of
the bishom.
You drill any amount you'll be
useful at all.
To which then the garra says light it's
not true that you're saying that the
case of the drilling is multiple cases
but what's it going to be for
so in this it was a slight different way
of how the conversation went the says
had the only said that you shouldn't let
the carbon become
it's only going to be on theates but not
the rest of the carbon
How do you know that the is also going
to be by the carbon itself that you
can't let the become even before you
take away that
dash the extra word to say that the
whole has this of becoming
because that was actually talking
specifically about how do you know by
all the other carbon
going back to the
only that you can bring to Hashem that's
the one that you could bring as the
carbon about a carbon that became pussle
like for example Rashi says became it
had a or became tame there won't be any
of except for a kusher carbon and we
mentioned yesterday from the briskarov
about the difference between the kmates
and the shirim of the mil because once
the thing becomes pussle you can no
longer bring it and therefore there
wouldn't be any is being after it was
already
let's say someone let the dough of the
mka become the yas and then the dough
left the mikda and then he went ahead
and did Another is the guy just like
somebody who already had a or maybe now
he's because it has already and now we
speak out the since it already had
so then
maybe since it already became before it
had
it won't be affected by the
and now when he comes to be Then
to which the obliv
say before he burned it on the that's
when he let it become
he already brought it on the so
therefore it's already too late and
you're not going to be over the lava
making it
didn't burn it yet so therefore it's
still considered like it hasn't been
brought and therefore you should still
be for the
now
As we said the word that the entire
cannot become
sounds like we're only talking about the
that's the part that you actually bring
on the but implies the whole carbon
we know by every carbon and every carbon
there's always a that gets along with it
and there's no that's taken from that
it's all burned. So the of this is going
to be that you're going to also have the
even for the
upon that are put on the from one chabs
to the next that they also have the iser
of now according to who learned that it
was coming
and when we say may peris it's lav davka
it doesn't mean you're using apple juice
but it's the things that are other than
water because in this case it's going to
be the shemen or the honey and that's
what's mixed with the flour turning over
to basu
It doesn't ever become with these
meaning things that are other than
water. So it's impossible that a could
come into marba by the
it wouldn't become this.
So even though there's the parish in
there still added water which now makes
it to become and that's why the would be
according to in the of course cracks
open the whole of the mat a whether or
not it can be at all. How literal is
this of maybe it makes into
the way you prepare the upon him is by
using the measure solids not liquids
those kinds of don't create the and only
become the once it's put on the but at
this point in the process they won't
have that level of kadusha and therefore
the shouldn't matter so how can say that
to coming
what's in the upon him doesn't have it
yet. So the gar seems to be mask him and
say okay we got to switch around the
bryerish
this is how he's supposed to present
this bryer switch it around
because it was only issue like about not
being Scottish yet. So we switched it
around now. It's gonna be okay.
And this that we're referring to is that
these that were designated only for dry
measurements had their
says
and
however
says I'll bring
that there was no mash at all on the
measuring only the meas because that
they're not that flower that's put
inside them as it says by the
they become only after they're baked but
not when they're put into the because
it's not at that point. So what's the
we're discussing here? It's dash the
word in that
of the and therefore had its
however
let's go back to what we said earlier.
that the kale that were designated for
were not who the
so this should have been an option for
when he was lining up the bry
didn't want to put together with because
they had on a different issue by the mid
because hold these kum were only kadesh
on the inside where holds it was both
the inside and the outside so because of
that mle didn't want to say that and
were saying the same thing fammora Omar
there was another simple solution about
using for the upon him because remember
the ownita was that you can't tell me
it's coming to be if it's not yet until
you actually put it on the because the
kal itself is not
there's that bowl where the oil and the
flour were mixed where they did the bal
and that's the and therefore even
according to that should be madesh the
do of the upon him and therefore you
should have the issue of and for the
armor biases back to a republic going
you need it for a case when you actually
did the kneading of the on top of this
piece of leather and therefore it's not
going to become so if you're telling me
you're allowed to use a nonlayaris like
that so
what had said to
say back to
where he did the measurement of the
flower in a nongdish
because you see it's not so critical to
do that So
say that he put it into the
never said you got to do it in a to
knead the dough and
if you knead the dough on top of this
piece of leather le there's no problem
you're allowed to do that but by the
case of the when you have to measure it
the says you got to make an isern and
measure the flower in it
can't do that so could never have said
that a nondishan and could be used to
make the flour cuz it was always being
measured in a proper kay.