Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Menachos Daf 56
6 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, Dunv Sunday is Daf and we
were discussing the possibility of the
cluprat by the requirement of having the
ni bring his carbon in the suffin area
of the bases mdash. And the whole point
of bringing this was to show that a
clalop that's still can be dar is a
clopiki.
And the last thing we learned yesterday
was raashi's kasha that it's not really
a prat but rather it's a pratl and the
shouldal. So now we're picking up the
last skinny line on
the T was worried about the word.
Maybe the is singled out to tell you
that that sawyer has to be brought in
the but it's not
and no other even has to be done in the
wrote the by the case of the therefore
we need another puss of the regular
carbonus to tell you that is not other
of doing it in the
why do I even need the what's it coming
to what's it coming from
and now we have a list
of the different things that's coming
to the
not the
when he was doing those different
carbonus inaugurating the Mishkan that
were not to be done in the
just like those carbonus had like the
regular other carbonus and maybe should
also have the of doing it in the safano
by the nasi tells us that dafka It's
that needs to be but not these other
ones.
And we're using as the example of all of
those different from the
how do you know that the required like
the system says
moving over
when has to bring the it also requires
who holds that that first of requires.
So then I might think that they also
have a of but who holds that he never
needed in the first place my why would I
even need a mut of maruch of ra because
it's also going to be because my this is
my there was no specifically of it was
only so why should I assume it applies
also to that so I never needed even
according to
maybe if it hadn't
meaning
from a regular carbon that always
requires that suffering. So maybe also
all the other ones would also require
suffering. But no, I would say
you could be quiet. If you tell me would
have been enough, I wouldn't have needed
for either.
It was a historical event that you can't
learn from that one time event to all
other future dire
and therefore we don't need the from
those. So what do I need the m for
but the himself doesn't have to stand
there. You may remember all this from we
had a similar there but the himself
maybe doesn't need to be standing in
that location. He could be in the
southern side and just kind of lean in
with a long knife. But that can't be
enough because we know from
you might think formed.
So we don't need the
to be this. So what's it coming from
that the malik does not need to be done
in the why would I think otherwise
a regular sheeps that you're bringing as
a carbon like cayenne doesn't require to
do it because
yet still
where the tyra does say that the mala
must be done by a kayak
you should need to have the comes the
word that malab
The Tory says you have to use a knife.
But that's not the case by Malika where
the K uses his fingernail. There's no
reason to think that the would have to
be done in the because you already see
it's a unique and therefore we don't
need
that you don't bring the
we don't need that either because
really there's
still
it has to be done at a particular time
so it has that no I'll be that because
carbon has its own has to be completely
burned which we don't say about carbon
which is eaten by the bum. So here's
another suggestion for meas because a
carbon kas doesn't have that milo of the
oil that it's completely burned and
therefore maybe that's what I need is to
tell you about the carbon pes no because
you don't say that by a carbon
maybe the can be made from an to say
that carbon pes requires
because an asham is not going to be for
curries no because malam has its
uniqueness kum and carbon pes is not
that way because carbon pes is not kum
but rather it's kachum kum and tammy
kunami and we can't say that the
is coming from all the carbonas together
because they also are all as opposed to
which is only so we don't need to have
but himself does not need to stand there
we already knew this
no
his are not coming to include the being
in the southern parting with his long
knife. What was coming to say was
so
but maybe we're using about the not
having to stand in the northern part is
it's a different
and therefore not needed
did not hold that he didn't think it was
so clear and therefore he needed to
learn it from the carbon and then we're
going to stick with the not having to
stand in the t as the from then our
mission
that a person's malus for doing any of
these individual activities with the
carbon which was the kneading the
shaping the baking of if someone baked a
carbon that became
and the way Rashi learns that he gets
two sets of
because he shaped it and he baked it
says
this was yesterday's that we made a
point that it's only a single lav so how
You tell me twice it's not fair from
that price because who and
if he did everything that means he did
the and then he did the so once he's
already once on the he's not going to be
twice on the once on the but if his
buddy did the and tak got the lob for
that and then gave it to him to do the
baking now that baking will actually be
twice for and fork
let's say you have a bkar which is going
to die that's what's going on over here
it's deathly ill because of this blood
issue that it has. So,
you could do the rafu and do the
bloodletting of it even though you're
not allowed to create but you do it.
We're concerned that you shouldn't make
a on this animal.
You don't have to worry even if it's
going to leave a
don't because of that. So, we're going
to be make in order to save the animal's
life, but you're not allowed to shed it
and eat it like regular. You got to wait
for it to develop another mum and then
you can sh it. But otherwise, it's going
to look like you're taking advantage of
this rafu to make it into a balum. So
you can have it as shimmer turning over.
I don't even care. As a result of this
bloodletting, you can now and eat it
yourself. Finally,
even if this animal is going to drop
dead,
you are not allowed to give it a
we just said,
let's say you take this after it was
already and now you continue to work
with it. meaning you're shaping it and
you're kneading it. that will be
rabb spoke out from the brisker that
that this is only going to be about the
because the actual once it becomes ple
you can't have a but something that's
puzzle the technically not puzzle you
just then to have the afterm another
similar
let's say an animal which is user to
bear that it can't be anymore let's say
it's already in that mat and you do it
again the second time you're also
if you're already for cutting the bum of
this animal
certainly to detach them is certainly
going to be. So why does the Tyra need
to even say there's going to be an iss
that that actually is going to be also
even though the animal can technically
no longer be milled because of the first
thing you did the second thing you did
also still but where is her mayor and
the raon and the B are going to be
arguing that's
going to be
so there's going to be how to look at a
whether or not there's new of being that
now mayor
which seems like it's only going to be a
lav when you're doing it to a tim an
unmified animal
that puk of is coming to be an animal
that was already born with that mum. So
where it was never shak to be a carbon
the is not going to be but if the animal
was once and then became a there will be
the is to do it again
it's like a tree obviously there's no to
make a because it's not in the first
place to be a carbon
that is coming to be the mum by animals
after their
still applying to these animals you're
not allowed to do with these kinds of
animals that you had the pigion
We should have that same that's why the
Torah would need to say that by the is
going to be but not by other ones.
So how do they deal with her mayor's
which sounds like every time there's
going to be an issue
of gum not being directly
it's not that way even if you indirectly
cause it
and you can't put the dough or the figs
on the animal's earl
so the dog will come and nibble on that
ear a little bit that's still going to
be just as user as doing it yourself and
you might think therefore it wouldn't be
user cuz you're being government and not
actually doing it yourself. Tell him
liber
both kinds are going to be user.