Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Menachos Daf 108
8 views
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, Duff Kuf Khes, this is already
Wednesday's Duff. And we are picking it
up from the two dots on Kuf Zayin Amud
Bais towards the bottom as we're going
to spend some time now in Maseches
Shkalim. So now awesome, we learned in
the sixth perek of Shkalim, shisha
l'nedava, there were six of these
different pushkas for different nedavos.
So k'neged mi, what were the six for?
And then the Gemara gives us a siman,
k'mafsha, which is a little bit tamua,
the Rish asks that it doesn't really
make sense because it's not really
referring to the names of the different
amoraim they're speaking, it's the wrong
number of them. The sheet that changes
the girsa here and if you're into this
sort of thing, you can hear an inventive
chat from Rebbe Gross how to be miyashuv
the siman. So what are the different six
nedava boxes for? Amar Chizkiya, k'neged
shisha batei avos hakohanim. They were
k'neged the six different batei avos.
Within the different mishmaros, they
were broken into six different batei
avos that were switched off working in
the Beis Hamikdash. And to avoid fights
between them, because some might be more
than the others, tiknu lahem chachamim
shisha l'zeh im zeh. So because of that
potential problem, all the money was
divided equally and put into these
different shofarois, meaning these
different boxes, and each one of these
boxes were given to each one of the
batei avos respectively. Yachanah amar
mitachshanah. Nedava meruba, since there
was a lot of nedavos, tiknu lahem
shofarois merubos. They just wanted to
divide up all the same monies, but they
needed to keep the money apart from each
other k'dei shelo yis'afshu hamonois.
Remember, money in that day, that
coinage was based on weight, and if it
would corrode and rot, the actual money
would be devalued. So you had to
separate the money so it shouldn't all
be squished up against each other and
therefore that's why we had these six
different boxes. U'zeiri amar, k'neged
par, the egel, ayil, the keves, k'dei
v'sayir. We have different monies that
go towards different kinds of animals.
Because someone who's menadev to bring a
shor l'mashal, he would put one maneh
into the shor pushka. And when the
kohanim would bring korbanos from those
kinds of animals, they would use the
money in those respective shofarois. The
Rebbe heitama katan hevei gadol
l'yotzei. And this is going l'shitas
Rebbe that we mentioned yesterday and
the day before, the Rebbe holds you
can't have that b'chol misai maneh kind
of an idea. You have to be very specific
and use only the money that was
designated for it. U'bar Pada amar,
k'neged par v'ayil. U'bar Pada amar, the
six different boxes were k'neged hapara
v'ha'ayil. Specifically by a par olam
d'orishah tzeibur or the ayil of a asham
eilais or asham gezeilos that were lost.
Moving over to Midalafak Kvasim or the
Asham Nazir that became tame or the
Metzora also that got lost and they
needed a place to put the money. That's
the Eirim and the Kansa Eirim that are
brought on Yom Tiv for a tuma that's
b'shagaig and my sorace and the extra,
let's say after the money was
designated, the price of the animal went
down. So now you have extra money. The
Bahama which is a reference to the
Kalban that's the additional money that
was given on top of the Machatzis
Hashekel. So that would be the six
different boxes, the six different
shofarace. Now, why didn't each one like
the other one? Because Kulu Kay Chizkiya
Amri that they didn't want to have
fighting between the Batei Avos because
Lantzu Lay Chishinan. After all, the
Kohanim are getting things so they
shouldn't be so quick to get angry.
Because the Kol Chad V'Chad Yuma Kovid,
each one has their respective day that
they get to work. So you don't need to
have separate shofarace for that. Rebbe
Yishmael Amri that's about the coins
becoming ruined because they're packed
together so tightly because they have
pusha chishinan. We're not chishin
they're going to get ruined. After all,
this fast turnover with this money so
it's not going to get rotted or corroded
inside the Keilim. Kidi Z'eiri Lay Amri
that they were designated for the that
each that each box was designated for a
different kind of animal because Ki
Yichida Lay Mukvi, because we don't have
to set sign Dafka like Shitas Rebbe that
Katna B'heima Gadol Layatza. That's
Dafka Yachid K'neged Shitas Rabbanan.
And K'var Padan Nami Lay Amri that was
done for all these different Ma'aserace
and lost Korbanos because Ma'aserace Kul
Nami Ma'aserace. All the other boxes
that were designated for the Korbanos
are also for Ma'aserace so you wouldn't
need to have a separate box just for
that. And Ma Nami L'skol Mazla. The Ma
which is that Kalban that goes along
with the Machatzis Hashekel also goes
into the general Skolum fund. De Tanya
because the Braisa says Lay Kalban Zeh
Laych. Where's the Kalban actually go?
It's L'skolum De Rebbe Meir. Rebbe
Elazar Omer L'nida Va. Now we want to
set sign this Mishna Maseches Shkolim
like Rebbe Meir and Al Rebbe Elazar. All
right. And now another p'shat of these
different shofarace. Rebbe Shmuel Omer
K'neged Ma'aser Chatas, Ma'aser Asham,
Ma'aser Asham Nazir, Ma'aser Asham
Metzora, Ma'aser Minchas Chavitin,
Ma'aser S'eirei Eifa Shel Kohen Gadol.
Which is a reference to the extra money
of the Kohen Gadol's Minchas Chavitin of
that S'eirei Eifa. That's what we're
using the six different boxes for. Rebbe
Yishaya Omer K'neged Ma'aser Chatas,
Ma'aser Asham, Ma'aser Asham Nazir,
Ma'aser Asham Metzora, Ma'aser Kinim,
Ma'aser Minchas Chavitin. So Rebbe is
maskin to Shmuel that they're used for
these meisaris, but he swaps out the
minchas kohen gadol with the kainan of
these birds. U'Shmuel might tell me omer
R'
because kainan tonalei Rashi we already
included kainan in the first seven which
we have been talking about but that's
the first part of that mission in
Shkalim was already designated for the
kainan.
The tonalei kainan so how did R'
understand the mission itself which the
says kainan meisaris kainan that's two
different boxes. One was for the actual
kainan and one was for the meiser of
that kainan. R' Rashi might tell me
why didn't he want to say the sefer from
the minchas because
omer meiser shall shall kainan gadol you
don't actually use it you let it rot
away. Even though we're not actually
talking about the ingredients themselves
of the korban we're talking about the
money that was done for that but the
point is you get rid of it you toss it
to the
etc. And my call omer what do we mean
when we talk about these meisaris? Omer
R' said
meiser minchas nedava extra from the
minchas is considered like the nedava.
Meiser
shall kainan gadol so in other words R'
is coming to explain this is how R'
understood the braisa. Rabba omer
another part of the braisa afilu meiser
kainan gadol
omer lachmei yerak you know what doesn't
get saved is the meiser of the lachmei
because it has to be brought with its
lachmei. And therefore the braisa is not
necessarily going like R' and this is
also similar to another
plug to meiser
shall kainan gadol
R' Elazar omer yerak. All right but in
fact the meiser let's ask from the
mission in the second perek of Shkalim.
Meiser Shkalim
if you have extra money from the Shkalim
it's going to be omer meiser
omer kainan
those are meiser and nedava. So my love
can't we take from there that the
is talking about the meiser shall kainan
gadol and therefore that
is brought as a nedava which the says
loy. You know what the meisaris we're
talking about we're talking about the
meiser minchas
not the minchas kainan gadol and
that
will be left to be yerak. Omer R'
omer command omer meiser
shall kainan gadol yerak because the
loyosam shemen
levana ki chatos hi and omer R'
he chatos and keriah chatos meaning only
the minchas is called a chatos but not
money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
amount of money to be able to buy the
correct amount of money to be able to
buy the correct amount of money to be
able to buy the correct amount of money
to be able to buy the correct amount of
money to be able to buy the correct
Torah, or should I give two smaller
kesarim, one for each one of the Yotzei
Chaim? So, it's the same value of
silver, but is it better to bring one
big one or two smaller ones? The
Margoliyos HaShas quotes this rebbe by
saying, "Well, to be fair, it's Rashi in
Menachos on Kuf Ches Mem Beis, where
Rashi says, "B'chol makom shnayim
chashuvim meyuchad, afilu shnayim
shavim." So, better to bring two
different kesarim on the sefer Torah.
This might be related to the Likutei
Sichos. The Rebbe Shlita has a long
piece in Eis Tes Vav, where he goes
through which is better, echos or kamos?
Is it better to do many mitzvos or worse
to do many aveiros versus the echos of a
bigger or worse avera? I didn't say that
well, but I think you understand what I
mean. Ah, echos versus kamos. Might be
related to that idea of the Rambam about
giving tzedaka to many more aniyim even
in smaller amounts, cuz rov hamayseh is
going to be the better way to go.
"Prechtige Mar, well, if like Nomi
Beracha, why shouldn't Rebbe also argue
in the beginning of the Mishnah, which
says if you're going to bring one shar
and it becomes ba'al mum, you're allowed
to bring two?" Rebbe should argue with
that, too. To which the Gemara says,
"You're right, he does. Rebbe Akiva
milse poleg. Binatur l'Rabbanan in the
demasqi milse. He only waited till the
end. He waited for the Rabbanan to
finish talking before. He was going to
argue, then v'hadar mifleg alav. That's
when he argued. "Tena d'Rebbe bring you
a raya that that's the pshat in shitas
Rebbe Diktoni." Cuz the Mishnah also
says, "Ayil zeh oilah v'nistav, rotzeh
yavi d'mov keves." And likewise, "Keves
zeh oilah v'nistav, rotzeh yavi d'mov
ayil." And likewise, "Keves zeh oilah
v'nistav, rotzeh yavi d'mov ayil." Rebbe
Yishmael. So, you see that Rebbe is
coming to argue at the end on all of
these halachos. "Shma mi nafshei. Yiboi
lehu a new shaila. Mi mina l'mina mai?
What about if you want to swap out that
ba'al mum with not just a different
value of animal, but another kind of
animal?" Like Rashi says, the guy says,
"The shar zeh oilah became ba'al mum,
can he now bring two ayilim, two
different animals?" The Torah Shma bring
you a raya from a braisa. "Shar zeh
oilah v'nistav, lo yavi d'mov ayil, aval
yavi d'mov shnei ayilim." So, you see
you have no problem switching animals.
You went from a shar to an ayil. "Rebbe
Yishmael oif pishain bilah." Rebbe says
there's another technical problem,
because since these two different kinds
of animals are going to require separate
menachos, and you can't mix the two
together, so that'll be a problem. But
"Shma mi nafshei." You see you can swap
out the different kind of animal with
one from the other. So, "Yachi, if
that's the case, mai arya trei?" Why did
the Rabbanan only talk about bringing
two ayilim, A feel had nami, even if
it's one ayil. Because they'll have been
a stoic in a case of where it became a
balmum. The rabbonim only shone a little
bit got a little cotton. The rabbonim
don't care about the size of the animal
as long as you're bringing the total
same value. Which the mar says in the
qonomi trait and I believe in rabbonim.
But the time of our mishnah doesn't make
a difference between the godol and the
qoton. Whereas the time of the braisa
does. Rebbi oiser shain beila that you
have this technical problem of mixing
the two minochos. Time of day in beila
but it sounds like ayish beila shari.
Well that's not going to work. But
what's now we learned in our mishnah
ayil oilev in a stoic yavi bedam of
keves. Keves oilev in a stoic yavi bedam
of ayil for Rebbi Oiser. It's not just
about the fact that there's no beila.
Even if it's all brought in one keili
Rebbi's going to answer because it's not
exactly what you promised. Which the mar
says trait and I believe in Rebbi in the
qonomi. U beta chiyurim the braisa
continues and says legabe these chiyurim
which is another way of saying that
there's no mum. Eigel the heavy par for
a person brought a par even though he
promised an eigel. Or keves the heavy
ayil yotza. To which the mar says
stomach qorbonim. The mar saying this
braisa is going like shitas rabbonim
that if you promise a smaller animal you
can bring the bigger animal. Then the
mishnah said rotzi yavi bedam of shnayim
etc. That this particular shar should be
a shar ayil and it became a balmum. You
could bring two in its replacement. Omar
of Menashe bar Svid Omar Rav leshanu ela
d'omar shar zeh ayil. The only time you
can bring two as a replacement is if you
said this shar should be an ayil.
Because then you have no chiyuv on the
gavra if it became a balmum. Aval Omar
shar zeh al ayil. Well then chukva. Then
he has to bring dafka one shar. Prakta
mar of dam al ayil vehicle Omar. Maybe
all he meant to say it should be on me
to bring it but not that I'm being
mechayev my gavra if something happens
to it. So Eliyahu
this is what Rebbi Menashe meant. Omar
Rebbi Menashe bar Svid Omar Rav leshanu
ela d'omar shar zeh ayil. Or enami Omar
shar zeh al ayil. Aval Omar shar zeh
vidam of ayil then it's going to be
chukva. Because at that point you're
saying I'm taking a personal
responsibility to bring its chiluf of
its replacement exactly the same way and
not just being mechayev myself to bring
a korban. Zok the mishnah Homer echad
mikvasai hegdish. One of my shepselach
should be hegdish and therefore I got to
bring as a korban. Ve'echad mishvorai
hegdish or one of my shvorim should be
hegdish. O ilu shnayim. He's got two of
them. What do you do now? So how do you
bring it hegdish? You bring the bigger
one because we assume he was punished by
the court. And therefore he went to be
punished by the court. Let's say he has
three. Then he should be punished by the
court. Then we go with the middle one.
I know I was but I don't remember what I
was.
Or my father told me that he was
punished by the court. But I don't know
which one. The law is he should be
punished by the court.
So the court will punish him by the
court.
If a person is being punished they're
always going to go for the most
expensive one. But it doesn't seem to be
that way consistently in the Mishnah. He
must have been punished by the court.
We go with the middle one. If you have
more than two. So he was punished by the
court.
So which one is it?
He should be punished by the court.
The end of the Mishnah just means you
have to be punished by the court.
He should be punished by the court.
The smaller one the court considered the
court. So both the best one and the
court considered in that the same court.
So
now what do I do that I'm the court?
The court will punish him by the court.
You wait for that middle court to have
a court.
And now you transfer that on to a larger
one. So even if he initially intended
the court no problem you take care of it
with the bigger one. He was punished by
the court.
That's only when he says one of my
should be punished by the court.
One amongst my should be punished by the
court.
The best one is definitely going to be
punished by the court. Because what he's
saying is
the most one amongst my should be
punished by the court. That's what we
just assume he means. Is that what it
means that the best one amongst my
should be punished by the court.
He was punished by the court. Someone
says I'm going to sell you a house
in my estate of houses. So what does he
mean? So we apply the law of how much he
was punished by the court. And
you only get to sell him the house. So
that's how we can what he's saying. The
court might be the court in the house.
Now
the reason
why you can be punished by the court is
because it's the one. So similarly if
you're punished by the court amongst my
you're also not giving the best one.
Interestingly the Gamara is not michalig
between mecha and memkar and hegdish.
I'm not sure if this is a problem with
that Rebbe Chanan that we spoke about
the other day. To which the Gamara now
answers, "Lo meula shibabatim." What the
aliya doesn't mean the crummy attic, it
means the best of your homes. And in the
chonomi, that is what he means. The
meula shibabatim. In the same way, it'll
be the meula of my shvarim. Meisvei, the
braisa says, "Shar bishvarai hegdish."
That one shar amongst my shvarim should
become an ola. The chein shar shel
hegdish in this arva cheirim also one
gets mixed up hegdish. Vekulam yimocher
letzarchei olos. And all the rest of
them should be sold for olos. V'dmeihen
chulin and the money that they are sold
for becomes chulin. So, since the other
shvarim are sold as an ola, clearly
there's a safek whether they're hegdish.
So, the chazal is koneged Rava bar Avuha
that only the largest and best one is
the hegdish one. And the Gamara targuma
asher shel hegdish in this arva cheirim.
We're not talking about where you made a
promise, but rather there was an
existing shar of hegdish that got mixed
up with other ones. Now, I'm really
mesupak. Aivaha, v'chein komer. The
braisa says v'chein which sounds like it
should be the same by both halachos. To
which the Gamara answers, "Targuma
agodel." The v'chein is going like the
biggest one should be hegdish. Which is
like that first part of the psak. And
therefore, both parts of the braisa are
going to have that part of the psak that
the biggest one should be hegdish. The
fact that all the other animals are
going to be sold as olos is only talking
about the case of the shar shel hegdish
that became mixed up with other shvarim.
All right, we're going to stop here and
pick it up from here tomorrow.