Menachos 93

Today's and we have three lines from the top of the two dots. So yesterday we began a new the we gave a little bit of an introduction talked about what exactly was meant to represent. Meaning in as much as are all the milo like lays out in the beginning of parra. But at the same time the idea of smika was that the balhaarban by leaning his weight on the animal was transferring whatever it was that he had of zinh hearts whatever averas he was carrying on his plates and he was literally imparting it through osmosis or through onto the animal that he was leaning on. That's the of why the inimon says that this that we find that had to be he had to do chuva the vid component of the chuva used to take place at the time of this because is when this person is getting rid of his a that's when he's doing the proverbial or tashl or whatever mshall you want to use and it's therefore very befitting and approp appropriate at that point to be mis either way yesterday's daf discussed a lot of is related to mostly today's is a continuation albeit a much lighter continuation so the at the very end of the said that within the laws of if somebody yarish a carbon from his father his mother and he now has an obligation to bring this carbon, he too would do. Why is it? So there could have been a thought that being that the is not really the bin. Now he is, but initially he wasn't. So maybe he's excluded from the parish of the Mishna said. And then the Mishna said, "Oh, by the way, we just mentioned the Yish, so this would seem to be a befitting and an appropriate place to tell me some other about, right? There's no sus. There's no peric yish. So this is really the place to talk about it. So as it relates to you should know in addition to the fact that he saw he's also # two days ago. Additionally if he went and he violated the laws of tomorrow it would be considered a on that note says the Tony. So presented a bryer in the presence of the great and the bryer said as follows and cannot do which is the exact antithesis of what we just mentioned from the says when he said he told him come again it's a but as relates to the first and the third thing Irish is very taken back and he told him right he looked at are you suggesting that this must be a mistaken bryer do I have to flip the instead of the saying should it say it's not something that you have to do because we can get out of this situation By saying you want to know who the T of the B is usually is the but you want to know who the T of the B is which that's the of our meaning there's a that presents this as hence your which contradicts our Mishna doesn't necessarily need be edited because you could always say that other who by the way has a name it's the Tan Rabuda In other words, whether or not is really it's a one way happens to be somewhere else the other way and really at the end of the day it's between according to the which is the according to says the my time what is the why does he hold that iso says it says the I'll tell you why because it says now if you remember at the very very end of yesterday's actually the top line of we mentioned that it says the word carbon six times extra in the par of in the context of the rashi says three of those times we dioned elsewhere and the other three were ded on the very top of the if you remember the said that the first carbon is carbon you can't be a second one was if a guy brings a carbon there's no on his carbon and finally that in the event that bring a carbon each every member of that entity needs to go ahead and provide some sort of so on that note says you want to know why I hold that it's because you remember it says carbon and I hold that one of those three extra carbon teaching me carbon that for your carbon not for your father's carbon. So if you're there's not going to be says okay that explains why what about why does hold that learned which here refers to as from which we refer to as soak means somewhere in the onset of this means when you're ready starting to do the so over here isactish right a more conventional would mean when A person says but okay is a another way of making something hectish. So is referred to as referred to as he says the reason is because it happened right before the started. So that's at the very very end of its status of hectish before you're actually uh delivering it to says it makes sense to learn from just as it relates to it relates to is excluded. So too as it relates to which is he's going to be excluded as well. So my time that's from and if he's from what does have to do with believe it or not they're the two book ends of the hish what does one is and it makes sense that whatever is by one is going to be by the other says what is and hold it says in the par of that's a doubleion it's coming to something that is included in okay and once I know that is included in the affformentioned methodology we're now going to learn which is just like as relates so as it relates to is going to be in other words The Mus between Rab Yehuda and Rabon is had. That's obvious that is because and once I know that is excluded from I'm also going to know that is excluded from what is one factor is make sense. one from the other as relates to oh if I know aish is included in I know he has to be included inact as well same methodology so agree to a certain extent and that is in terms of the concept the principle of learning from vice versa the idea that those two should be the same the question is what's the starting point according The starting point is and then we work backwards from there according to the and we move forward from there. Now what's going to be the next part of the avoid of the d it's going to be to try to understand why and don't carbon why and with what do the do with carbon and what does do with oh and by the way if that's what do with carbon what's going to say and if that's rauda does with vim hammer what are the rabbon going to say so it's going to be a little bit of valley from here now until the Mishna just going through this shitar classic says the delay what did what did the Rabon do with that so the says oh that's easy that was uh the end of yesterday's they learned from the word all three of them were already taken so there's nothing extra says okay for says the gimar what's going to do so has two suggestions either the rabbi's kalik either doesn't hold of one of those three because he holds that if there many in a carbon then they could appoint one of the to go ahead and do this it's not considered a and in that instance it's going to work for everybody else so he doesn't have that one application of carbon hence there's one extra to be uh alternatively Another way to learn is that holds that one of them is the rabbi's carbon. However, meaning he holds that that's really included but at the same time he holds that and doesn't need two carbon because really they're one and the same. Think about it. What does mean that the carbon has to be the one to do this? Okay. So if Ruven can't have Shim do this for him, well then in Yehudi also can't have a Yiddik for him because it's at the end of the day the Gy and it's for that reason that Rab Yehuda holds that those two is learn from one well if that's the case then they're going to be two that are going to be left over Bottom line is the says you want to know why the rabban the way did is because according to Raun it's taken by the way six carbon and they're all taken. If there was a seventh but we don't have a seventh or we have a six. Okay. What is two eights is why coin maybe it's not going to be taken. Good. Now we have to work the other way. Who the hell the abundant starting point was as it relates to was and from there he went forward and he said that the is going to be included in obviously doesn't learn is because he holds what does do with say he uses it to teach me that an isha is included in the parish of tomorrow. Why would I think not that it's a because if you go through the par of tomorrow the entire par is talking and based on that alone you would have thought that is would be excluded is at the end of the day is there any here to be it says already used and that is the way is going to learn. It says the raon and what about how do they know the rabbis? How do you know to be it says not just now? It had to say or immer or if you want to be immer So what's the it's and being that he doesn't say for that reason he only has one says she doesn't have a also to be so again as it relates to why the don't oft That's Rab Yehuda. It's because all six carbonas are already taken. There's no carbon to be as it relates to why doesn't like the which was because whereas moving along another Mishna Everybody that brings a carbon, but we have to read the not such fine print. Whoa, that's a long list. So, everyone does. Not really. Doesn't do doesn't do a cotton doesn't dome. A doesn't do doesn't do an as in doesn't dome. A can't do on behalf of somebody else. And a woman doesn't do either. is meaning it's extra credit. It's not active the carbon. It's interesting. We know that whatever comes after the isitzvah comes before the so could have been a that maybe this is actually additionally had to be done on the head of the animal. It had to be done with two hands. The was done wherever the was going to be done. So wherever the was going to be done, wherever the was going to be done, whatever was identified at the place, that's exactly where you have to do this. Additionally, the take of the there couldn't be any time lapse between the and the so this is like there's ofd right which means you're supposed to make kdish where you're going to eat and also when you're going to eat this similar idea of which so number one number two the manwise had the now is going to do what it does it's going to analyze the Mishna taking it from the top. That's the first analysis of the Gar says aspecially I understand why are excluded from the mitzvah of and the reason is it's because they don't have d and being that they don't have they can't be included in now this is a little bit interesting what does das have to do with in order to do you have to have das in order to do you have to be able to lean your diet Right. That's all you have to do. It's a physical act. Where does impact that you look at the say it's because they don't have to be able to do the does this mean because the is the but says that because throughout so it's for that reason they can't do either. When says that is excluded, that's also posh. It's because it says in the parish of and we learn from that's easy. Why are excluded easy is excluded easy? Why can't a suma do is a so if that's the case regular why should he be excluded from the mitzvah of says it was but who said what we don't know said that the assuma is excluded from is learned out from shava from the ziko So what's the see yesterday's but we know the did on the okay in order to be a member of the that person could not be a suma and being that a suma is excluded then from doing the why because who did the and remember this was not allowed to be a suma well if that's the case so We learned from you that is going to have the same that is going to be excluded and the other one said we learned from the that the requires how do you know the requires so the is going to bring a drussa for that but the required and the mitzvah of is also something that excludes assuma that means assuma is never going to have a mitzvah to do on because he's parted from the mitzvah of and as a result he's parted from the so being that assume is excluded from that so too he's going to be excluded from all the bottom line is it was it was one said that from we learned it from the other one said it's learned from the because someone that's obviously is from the says I've learned it from it sounds like he held you learn it from and it's action you don't learn it out from the why not so says I'll tell you why because when we say that is from we mean that brings a carbon right obviously that's what we're talking about so brings a carbon is from you're going to learn it from which is a carbon done in that learned it from and he was willing to stretch himself to learn. Wouldn't it make more sense to learn from which the says I'll tell you why he didn't want to do that because he wanted to learn where the from something discusses it as opposed to the where it doesn't say anywhere in the was done. learned out from your classic. What is that? There was a Tana that once presented the following in the presence of it says in the ini and this is talking about the carbonus of the but it says and what's the referring to the and we learn from And this is a that he brought by and such as also requires. But here's the point. It doesn't say anywhere that requires. It's something that's learned out from the word being that it's not. You'd rather learn from something than learn from not something. The bottom line is the Mishna said and then gave us a whole list of exclusions. So so far we tackled the first five who come together. They're all excluded from and somehow the fact that not impacts their ability or lack thereof to do. We mentioned the suma. the sum is excluded and one learned it from the could be done by sum because couldn't be. So, so do all can't be done by the other from the required and someone that was from hence every is always going to be from what about held was easy. So now we're going to go through the rest of the list and that is it says in the par of the word in fact we're going to now three mentions of the word with regards to we learn from the you have to do this your can't do it on your behalf you the have to do this you can't do it on your behalf You the have to do this. You can't have your wife do it on your behalf. Says the ly why do I need three meaning it should just say which it says and from there I would no it has to be meaning if it has to be that one mention of excludes all three of these categories. I need a special to and then another one for and then another one for says and the reason is because we're not all created equally. They're different as it relates to this. Each one has its own nuance, its own, its own. And therefore, if all I had was, which is a I would think not necessarily to be if they're all the same, I would be. But if they're not the same, then there's already mock to say I'll be this, not that, not the other. Again, this is 101. So the says, I'll tell you what, cuz had it only said one, I would have told him. Who is the lowest hanging fruit in terms of being over here? I would think it's the Ev. And the reason is the bar mitzvah is not a mitzvah. And really the punch line is in the next line of being that he's not a mitzvah. So he's excluded from the parish of can never be he can't be to be he can't be to do. So being that he's someone that's always excluded from being ash of you. So I would have thought he's coming to me and because he's a mitzvah he's included in the the parish of the second of really I would think he's included I only known two so I would know to be but maybe even them even who's a mitzvah who has power of attorney but he's not butsh who we know Maybe she should be able to do for you. That's why I would need three. But the bottom line is because not all one and the same. Therefore, we need three mutant. This is an interesting we spoke about this seven and a half years ago where you see that the idea of which is usually more of a theme. This is more that you hear in you see it permeates that there would have been that of would have been different. is not just is a real mitz and you could have thought that but anto moving along the then said that as it relates to you should know it's not it's extra credit it's so theor is going to bring a price in that's going to elaborate on this point it says where does it say that so this is this was the that we began the with that mysteriously the mentions the of that one gets when he brings a carbon take right that's where we mention it and then immediately we mention this of of but the asks right it can't be literally it can't be you have to do He didn't do anything. even how do you know it's aap what's going to tell me it's mitzvah that in the event a person treats this mitzvah doesn't mean he treats it as mitzvah so it sounds like a herish type of thing but if you look at rashi rashi says it means you don't do it right if you don't do this because I don't have to do it so maybe you don't do it we act as if the person didn't get However, for keeper, he really does get says what this means in English is that what the saying is that as much as that's what theap is all about. But at the same time there's a mitzvah and a there's a level of that a person only gets if he goes ahead and he does the so that is it no but it's or if you don't do the it's and that's what we learn from the of the and the says the we have a similar that discuss that seems to mirror what we just said with regards to what's the background of the appar so the says talking about the week's par says the price of was the In the event that the person treats the meaning he doesn't do it we treat it however you should know that really you do get kapart the bottom line is and are both mitzvah that are not but there's a mitzvah to do it and that translates into so that in the event that a person doesn't do it there's like a right but It's ku magic word keeper. Bottom line is the Mishna said that. Now we have a little bit of a better idea of what this means. Alar next words of the Mishnir that the has to be done on the head of the animal. We have a brace of this too. It says carbonate. This is this is talking about the schluck where the talks about the we dashed a lot of those in the last two days. It says y and we learn from there and we learn that the it has to be al but it can't be it says a second time we learn from the full that it has to be da on the head as opposed to on the if the was done on the back of the animal it's not going to be okay it says it a third time we learn from the if it's going to be on the the breast of the animal That's also not going to be okay. It says, "Why do I need all these? I need three." Y to do that if it's or right? We were focusing on y in the previous Why do I need it three times? If it says, I know it's not on the throat. I know it's not on the No, it's not on the So why do I need it to say something? I'll tell you why it's only said one time I would have told him I would have thought it's coming to me the throat and the reason is that because the throat is not parallel to the head right so an animal when it's standing on all fours so the head is obviously the top of the animal and the throat is hanging down so being that it's not shva to the rush so you would have thought that's why it's not Okay, meaning has to be maybe not. just can't be on the as relates to the back which is maybe that's not excluded from I would have thought that the reason doesn't work on the because you don't find a mitzvah of where is applicable like right here you don't find by that part of the animal but the were included in the mitzvah I would have thought it's not excluded. Meaning once you find that the said you do the mitzvah of with the so maybe the should also be done with that's why I needed what would be if the person did on the head but he did it on the sides of the head not on top of the head. What would be like holding on to the cheeks? Rashi says Rashi says who was able this is the same y al that we mentioned earlier and we learn from here it has to be on the top of the head however if it's going to be on the side even on the cheeks that already is not going to be Okay. If somebody does, but he puts a in between his hands and the animal. Maybe he's a little squeamish, whatever. But he takes a musl and he puts it, but you can hear right between him and the animal itself. Is that a problem? Is there an issue with the says, right? usually rair's shilas everybody started like uh squirming and nobody was really sure what to do I mean they had ask at one point but the says this from the easier it seems as that's the end of that conversation back to the said that has to be done it has to be done with two hands says the honey how do you know that you have dome with two hands. And by the way, what's the background to the manan? Sometimes is I don't know. It's just like a an unintelligent type of but this is a very rich every time the talks about it says how many times it say a bunch of times. So y always means one hand. So it sounds like that it was always done with one hand not with two hands. So the question is what's the really has to be done with two hands said the says now this is talking about a that we spent a lot of time on yesterday's now says said of the word is and it also says two. Now we just read the word. So what does it mean? It says the way you pronounce the word is but if you look inside it says not. Hence theus is it's and being that we sometimes so we could it as if it says now is a lion and obviously means two. So grammatically it seems to be would make sense but uh his two hand it's his two hands this is a and it teaches me the following rule wherever it says it means to unless tells me otherwise. Oh y although you would think grammatically speaking just based on tikto should mean one but from here you see not that way because doesn't make sense if y means one ter says y means two and that for is the equivalent of but the bottom line is wherever it says it really always means two. So it's true. It says you have all these different mentions of means too and that's not always has to be. So the Garra says who said this there's a postcript to this went into he said over this and he didn't quote he didn't say it in his name got wind of the fact said over his not in his name he got very angry he was very upset and the way he expressed his anger was he walked over to Rebel and he asked Rebel Kasha Ku, you know, Rebel, you know, you're so confident with this Dasha as if it's your right thought it through a little bit, but in his mind heard it from him, didn't quote him and hadn't thought it through. So he went that he asked him the following question. He said, "If you're right that wherever it says, it really means to how come sometimes you find the Tyra says in fact actually He asked him 24 kashes. HE FOUND 24 TIMES THAT it says the word yvi. He asked him a bunch of kashnas. And the says ishik was quiet. Rebel didn't know what to answer. Right? So you say over someone else you better make sure you think it through the way he thought it through. Otherwise uh right you might get yourself into a LITTLE BIT OF TROUBLE. And ostensively that seems to be what happened with the the great rebel. the afterlish had uh I mean in English I guess he had calmed down a little bit he was he was okay with what had happened he wasn't anymore he told him he says you I shocked you out a little bit but come on I had thought this through you're how come you didn't come back to me you should have told me right what you should have told me was that there's aik between and other mentions of yad in other words when it says is in the context of it always means to but it's not a it's a right so he said you could have came back and you could have told this to me so says told him I'll tell you why because because I knew that you also find now what does it say that that's talking about when gave which we mentioned yesterday mirrored this of where he literally did. So he said I see even in the context of we use the word right you see it uh very when he commanded me told him what to do so told him again he didn't think it through properly when I said it right you quoting me right when I said it when I said it I meant it only by I know that I made my point that in the future please say in my name when you heard it from me there wasn't and even though I came and I fired away with all these kashas, but there was a way to get out of the situation. Either way, we're going to stop here. Reason we're going to stop here is because that's where 7 and 1/2 years ago she picks up. Even though it would make sense to learn one more line, but we're going to stop here and just speak out a few. So, just alan or actually alumar that we just learned, I think two very very obvious to it. One very obvious is The Gmorra says that had once said over a very very big and the says she said over this and he didn't say it over in the name and the says heard what happened and he got angry and then there's a very long theor says came and they went and they spoke to him and they tried being and it backfired. what they tried uh using to somehow comfort actually worked in the reverse. And says finally was one of the he walked into my lady told him it says from the it seems that always said over in the name of tells do you really think that every single time Yeshua ever said something out of his mouth he would There's no way everyone understood that whatever says he's saying over the from Yeshua is p of the lava takes the light of the sun and it imparts it upon the world. And that's exactly what Yeshua was doing. So he turned and he said so he sits and he without saying anything everybody knows that really all the that he's saying over his heard what said he turned to them who tried comforting in vain and he told them he says how come you don't know how to be Mafia The way our friend knows head of us did such a good job. You have to learn from him. You see this is the way you give a person. This is the way you comfort a person. But the bottom line is this is a mirror where said not it was the one he said it and he went and he had it been over here. Seems like is a repeat offender. This time he's not saying over something that he heard from and plagiarizing it. Not saying it over in his name, but now he's saying something that he heard from and he's not saying it over in his name, but just the mirror between these two that you see the same. Not just that you see was also it's interesting. Margolus in his on this he says what's and he says they had to defend Rabari was very successful in doing it but over here nobody comes to the defense of Rabazar meaning it sounds like Rabbazar needs to be defended you can't just say yeah Rabbazar had this he would say over sometimes as if he didn't hear from somebody else really heard it from somebody else. So what's the issue of this? So says I'm going to tell you what the is. He says this right says I found this in the you know who says this obviously it's prices are the ones that said this you know what that means you know who was plagiarizing the here using that word loosely but you know who was saying over and not giving proper credit for it. It's really it's said but it can't be because just like can't be doing this rish also can't be doing this. So he says must be rishlakish really said it over in the name of the brace he said it over in the name of the tan because otherwise rishlakish is guilty of what he's upset at for being guilty of so then what was having taser for so he says the is as follows take a look at what I wrote in my tom that's where proof my goals figured out who the are throughout he said in my over there in I have a that in the world of saying somebody else's name in the world of maybe if not you're a godlin it's true even if the person is not the so meaning if you heard something from someone who heard it from someone else in the world of properly saying it over it's not enough you go to the source you're supposed to say I heard it from him who heard it from him so why was rakish upset he says rish lakish was upset because why did Hey, I heard from Reish who heard from the sky. Why are you cutting out the middleman? You're not supposed to cut the middleman out. And that's for sure why he was upset. Says what's tak being that we just established that it wasn't really cuz really it's right. So wasn't one that was so heard from his as well. And that we know already from would say over not attributed to because that he didn't have to when you put all these together this is like one footnote but as we like to say this is classic margos one other that has to be mentioned and that is that I saw everybody asks that actually that right he wanted to show that he doesn't really know this so he asked him 24 kashes on yadv yadv yadv if you go through the there's no 24 yds there not 24 yds you don't have 24 to ask not in the whole so where the 24 yds that he even asked them but I think the very very push that is is the talks about after passed away had a tremendous amount over the untimely passing of the Great rich who's going to go behel they decide rebel ben pedas also known as rebel of ardaf He's the one that should go because he'll talk in learning to we think he'll have the ability to say also he went in front of everything that would say so would say I have a supports you here I have a that supports you there so turned to he said he says you're like he says I'm going to tell you how I used to learn And I would say he would ask me 24 and I would come up and I would have to say 24 like this. We walked away. We knew the telling me a price and here's the punch line. I need you to tell ME I'M SAYING GOOD. I KNEW I WAS SAYING GOOD. IF I DIDN'T THINK I WAS SAYING GOOD, I WOULD HAVE SAID IT. NO. The Gumar continues and the Gumar says that he was tearing his clothing and he was crying. He said and the Gar tells the whole story of the end of the life of ends up passing away through this a fascinating. But the bottom line is the bottom line is what was the meaning of when say something he would ask him he would ask him 24 kashes I don't know if he had real 24 cashes over here to ask say we don't have 24 kashes but at the same time this is the signon of lish where lish fires away he would come he would ask him 24 kashes when he would ask the 24 kashes knew what to say he came to and he asked him 24 kashes He was he was stumping him a little bit. I think that's the symmetry of this gam with the gar and with the of the but this is just uh just to mention one other and that is so one of the many that we had in the Mishna was that an isha is excluded excluded from now in our sug and one of the is coming to be the truth is that asked that what's the should be able to do had to be done before had to be done during the Hey, in fact had to be done literally right around the same time that the was done. If had to be done during the day, what emerges is that and we know from why do I need a to tell me that is excluded from and a from all mitzvah. Truth is asks this as well. And over there asks an expanded version of the Mishna over there discusses a whole bunch of that is excluded from in the world of all these things and brings for every single one of these. Why do I need all these? We know had to be done during the day. And if has to be done during the day, that means you could do it only by day, not by night. It's a and we know from we once mentioned a to this that the writes in his safer. The malam says how do we know that nshima are potter from mitzama? So it's a suggestion and it goes something like this. We know that our potter from how do we know from because from because is and we know from so through a heish I know from because the says so If a potter from that means are going to be potter from all mitzvah no any mitzvah that's fill is something that you do by day it's not something you do by night it's a mitzvah that's how I know from how do I know if you take it from the top is that means which means going to be from any that's similar to only from he says that we know that when it comes to this is one of the column that underpins the entirety of if that's the case is it's learned from is from and it's where do that works in with the exception of one area with the exception of being that by there's a rule of well if that's the case there's no when it comes to which is also Why is it that there's so many places that you find a mute of when it comes to different typically had to be done during the day and if that's the case then the TER IS DOESN'T APPLY TO WHAT DOES THAT MEAN I THOUGHT IT'S A REGULAR RULE THE TER is because of which that rule works in it's not something that works when it comes the caution I found in the is from the great he said in his own words but it's also he said this methodology of the malb which by the way he brings also from the that was written on the was very naunted. In fact, in the infer there's ap that gave on the bal but either way the said that this of the mal which is also in the safer of the could be of that brings in his shame. He says he says one of them right that's an expression said but one of the big asked me the following question and this question needs a tiny bit of an introduction one ra the ram in the beginning of this is peric if a person violates was one of the topics of today's d gets malus not just that for every single behavior that he does, he gets a separate malus says even though when someone does he violates all he did was talk say something he wasn't supposed to say but he didn't do a and the rule is that but says and being that this is one of the three exceptions to the rule. you get malus or somebody violates the law of but the says I have another on the malus of the says this is that this is one of the three exceptions to the rule the is also the says that in the event that you violate the is going And in the world of the but also and if it's based on that there should be no mala says the I'm going to tell you that's not a you know why it's because although this is the class but the lab are not what does that mean or even a carbon that's owned just by two people Reuben and Shim they don't have the ability to make the but at the same time if they went ahead and did the would be over the as it relates to says and are not the is more inclusive than the is everybody but that's not and says the only time there's a rule of is if the lab and but if the are not the is more inclusive than then you never say even when you're the in a way where you would have the essay it doesn't matter it's a tight it's a if the are you have the rule of if the are not you're not going to have the rule of this is a very rare from the Rambam. Usually the Ram lays out the law of the land without giving much explanation. See the introduction to the but over here the rabb actually gives us a little bit of insight into how he went about his the malus for the love of and the said there's really two kashas on the malus. one the asks isn't it for that we have but there's another it's the for the ages the only time you say is if the lab but if the lab is more inclusive it includes more people than the you're not going to say so the great said that one of them asked him the following Kasha he said we know Rab Yehuda has a sh that a is a mitzvah stating that it's that in his brings this talks about this throughout his said that even that holds that mitzvah it means he's from mitzvah but he's going to be included in mitzvah if that's the case ask this lon to to show It comes out that in the world of rahuda every single is more inclusive than an because the include the sum and the don't include THE SUM AND IF THAT'S THE CASE HOW COULD THERE BE A GLASS THIS WAS THE KASHA this was the lambd as and he says don't tell me does public maybe doesn't hold who said has to hold because hold and it's only for and not for maybe it's going to come out there's no but the London told him it can't be you know why that's mentioned in many places in we all know this I'm just going to quote it from it says regarding the carpon there's no malus on the laugh of you know why because it's a because somebody violates this. But the bottom line is is that we know is that there is a glass if there's a and right in this cloud that the only time you say if world it's not and if that's the case how could there ever be such a thing as so listen to the same he said that I want to say something I never found anywhere in a cipher which means it doesn't exist. See he said I'm going to tell you and that is based on the raid of the Malb and based on the raid of the he says take a look in the is also a classic said what is the holds that he said we learn from here any person that's included in like if his shirt damages If he's if he's somebody has to pay for someone that's included in the parish of is included in the parish of any person that's excluded from the parish of he's not included in mitzvah and is that assum he's from if he's from he's going to be from mitzvahim as well said the same how does know that assum from it's The Gar right before that says my time with how does know that as soon as the says anyone that's included in the included but any person that's not included in the parish of such as a because it says remember says who anyways is not in OTHER WORDS THE assumes is learned out from a heish from something itself that's learned out from aish that's the parish And there's another and based on formulated his position that is going to be this that the gave us that any that's can apply to based on the rule of the Well, it would come out that although that sum is but not when it comes to when it comes to over there can't be the reason it can't be because it's all learned out from which is which is not true for just like say that there's no because and it can't be by also can't apply to that. You're right. Is a big problem. You know why is a big problem? Because the lav and are not why they not because the is even the and the mitzvah says it's only IT'S NOT WHAT WAS THE CASH OF the brings his what DO YOU MEAN HIMSELF SAID WHERE DID he say it byer is BY THERE'S NO IF THAT'S THE CASE, THIS IS GOING TO BE OH by shiny is already going to be different by is going to be different. This is a it's a