Menachos 52

Today's is and we are a little bit behind. We're at the very top line of the today's being learned from and so we're moving along. We're already at the very very end. As a matter of fact, the last d or daff and a half of paratas the kchen part of specifically we're learning about the minavan. So the masan was a ma that was brought every single day in the bdash. We saw that it was brought by the so there were certain carbon that were brought tid in the basikdash. The most obvious one is the carbonid. A less obvious one was the minimum. We saw the kavita was unique in that it was one carbon that was brought and so the minimum sheer is that you would ever find that a min would have was the yet when it came to the it was only ain that was brought in the morning and ain that was brought in the evening. In other words, the entire min was taken and it was divided into two. Additionally, we saw that there were three lugan of shemen that went together with the something that the garra discussed in great detail on the garra brought the bry with and the three in terms of how to understand the bay of respectively. But one thing everybody agreed upon in that bry was that the amount of sheman that was brought together with the was three lugan but again it was brought so it's a very unique carbon it's unique that it's brought every day additionally it's unique in that it was but the bottom line is that it was brought by the current our mission is going to bring what happened in in the event that the kangle died. Now if the kangle dies and we appoint a new kangle, it's easy. The new kangle is now going to go and do what he has to do. We saw some of those suggies in the previous daff. The Misha discusses what happens if the kangado dies and they have yet to appoint a new. So we're living in this interim state where we don't have a kangle. The question is from the standpoint of the who is going to be the one that's going to bring the and it's that that will be the backdrop of the very first part of today's in the event and they have yet to appoint a new so who was responsible to bring the meaning that's shall go on. The question is who's going to bring it? Who's going to pay for it? Tells me that it was brought by the which means it was paid for the same way were paid for which was the rabbi said that it was brought by the Yin of the God that died. Additionally that in the event that the died and now it's either the orim that are bringing the it wasn't brought but rather it was brought complete. Now the Mishna is a little bit cryptic. Doesra mean that it was brought and or does it mean but only one time? Meaning it's the same with three of etc etc. It's just instead of splitting it into two which is what happened when the brought it in this instance. This will be the topic of the latter part of today's das. It's an in the g. For now we're going to focus on the Misim used to be every day in the B of Mikdash. The died they have yet to appoint a new as a result we have a Shiloh. What do we do with the Everybody agrees it was brought. The question is who paid for it? According to Shim, it was paid for by the meaning the were used to finance the masan during the according to Michelle it was paid for not by the but rather it was the of who had this responsibility the now is going to begin with a that's going to elaborate on the which is what bryes always do right so the bry is always the longer version of vet in the Mishna and in this particular bryo what we're going to see is the respective of literally the case and they have yet to appoint you know says the went on but it was paid for by The Pik says this is coming to teach me that when the Mashiach dies. So who has a responsibility to make sure that the are going to be brought it's [clears throat] so it's his children meaning his are the ones that are responsible. The price continues and says, "You would think that just like the father used to bring. Now to it should also be you would think that it should be the says it says and we learn from here that when the are bringing it when the bringing it should be brought it should not be brought and says the continues and says the word and from there we learn that it was paid for by the who's devel how does pay for something in the world of it's through the in other words it's brought from the and as it relates to the says that it was brought when it was not brought it says this is all in the same and from there we learn that it should be brought 100% meaning it should be brought 100% it should not be divided bottom line the mentions is that we already knew from the Mishna albeit with the now it's interesting both and learned their respective from the same the in its entirety is Yehuda says That's referring to we are the are going to bring it says it says means that's how you know that the has to pay from it. So the first additional thing that we saw in the bracelet that we hadn't known in the is we knew but the first is the according to it's learned out from according to it's learned out from another thing that we saw in the bisa was that the Mishna had said it seems that and have different as to where exactly I learn from. So they're not arguing. However, different according to it's learned out from the fact that it says and according to it's learned out from again it's a it's a that should be complete. So again we have the read and the oit with the additionally we have different ostensibly to the idea of ka. And now the Gomorrah is going to do what it always does. And the Gomorrah is going to analyze this and the respective says learned that the it was brought from the and how does he know it? Because it says suggesting that that is extra. This is what it's coming to teach memor this was very much used already. It's not available because this is very taken from a so the says also in the context of this is earlier. Now this P teaches us that the first day that he did the had to bring a special right just read the words that this is talking about the day that the had his the first day he's doing the he had to bring a special carbon a carbon that he brought was a this like all has a special name this was called the it was so to is because there was a called and it's learned out from this P. Now the Pik says that on the first day that they did the to bring this this now it's interesting that the was actually the same as the so and are really one and the same. As a matter of fact, we'll see in a minute that the Gmorra is going to say that this says is telling me the it's also telling me the so this one is actually it's actually telling me these two but for sure it's telling me that the first day that he did the he had to bring them in. Either way, let's see how the price goes about this. You would have thought you would think that all this is teaching is is the so the first day the first day does the he brings his the first day would do the day would bring them it's for that reason the said those words are extra could have just said obviously a carbon you bring to Hashem right so those words are extra and we learn for to teach me that there's really two that are being mentioned in this is being mentioned in this and that's soar yeah the first day does the has to bring the but also every day he has to bring the and then doesn't bring it every single day they only bring it continues when it says what it means is it's referred referring to the I mean who's the brings like we mentioned says the maybe no maybe when it says maybe is referring to the now isn't already included in the answer is yes but you could have thought that maybe there's a inov that every would have to bring the meaning you could have thought that maybe this special is unique to how do you know included meaning how do you know future so says the how do you know that when it says it means maybe it really means when it says that's our that's we've been talking about more There I know that even a future would have to bring the so what's this coming to teach me is coming to teach me the not every day but he would have to bring the but what's the bottom line we see from here that when it says that that regarding the that is not coming to teach me that that is that was coming to teach me that every even the after would have to bring the because maybe only a to bring the but every kind but the cash is also the holes that the man of new who brought the was the how does he know it because it's a I need that to teach me that every single had to bring the not only it would have been it was no every how to do it but the bottom line is how could you learn two from the same ping so the garra says I'll tell you why because in if it's only coming to teach me one the way learns it if it's only coming to teach you bring from the should have said why do we add the extra men it should have said all the have this responsibility from the fact that it says there's an extra limit over here it's coming to teach me not only are the responsible but also meov one son from the descendants of the hyon that are going to be chosen to be the kang He's going to have an obligation to be the every day. Bottom line is is that we t learn two from the we learn we also learn that every future would have to bring you learn two things from one because there's two to be learned. It says would have been as well. From there I know these two says the holds that the was brought from theore says the additionally who learned that the minor from the fact that it says so what exactly does he do with the word in the we had two things happening number one we had the respective additionally in the we also saw two how you know that the when it's being brought in this interim way according to from the word from it. It says who learns it from there. What does he do with it's talking about that died and they were another not the case of the not the case of the man another he has to bring his own meaning what happens if the brought the and he brought his half and then he ended up dying and they were mana somebody else. So we saw this already that the god the incoming would have to bring a new gans is and they were macroap and two halves went to the basra right the half that's left over from the kangad that died and the half that's [snorts] left over from the new kangal meaning the other half that's not being brought says the rebim learn that the new had to bring a fully even though half of it was going to go bad. So he learned it from we learn that you have to bring a so again a coin of Isa is not coming to teach me the when we're operating in this interim he's talking about where did we learn this already from the of in the previous we had this on the days doesn't hold and as a result that wasn't a good says who learns that they from the brought from the it's from the what does to do with that? He learns from here that the min was something that had to be brought every single day and it was a responsibility to be brought. That's how he knows this. What does Rhuda do with learn? What does do that with the word learned that already from needs for the following? So it says regarding the right that's these words right here. It says regarding the of the it says the word but it doesn't say and it also says now we know from learning for a little while now that are telling me the same thing right means to go ahead and burn it means it now one's a say maybe one's a but the bottom line is they seem to be saying the same thing but really they're not so much saying the same thing because kar sounds like you have to burn it 100%. But at the same time, it doesn't say mafurish that there's a and when it says there's a say that you're not eat it, but doesn't say that you have to burn it. It says but not so says the it's for that reason. I would have thought that only the meaning the first of these two that are mentioned in the which is the and I would think that's including the and the second one which is that how do you know that there's this even and this when it comes to says kind of says And it says regard just like when it comes to the you have to burn it and if you don't burn it so when it comes to so again mean the same thing but not 100% again is allowed talk is not allowed also talk says you have to burn it They have to burn it. But from the fact that this colo, that's how I know that the has a and a and that has a doctor and I only know because it says call in both places. What's the why it say I need it for the it doesn't say it anywhere else. I needed to know it by and I needed to be for the that's why it says either way. So going back to between okay according to and we saw the learns of and learns because it says now it sounds like this is right says is that true really hope that the fact that he learned from the said was in seven things regarding what's the so whatever had mentioned earlier that was number one what we need is not what he had mentioned earlier but one of the things he's going to mention now and he continued he said If sends his carbon if he brought with it meaning together with the package came along. So then the would use his if he didn't send so they would pay for the soy just like if he sent if not we we'll finance it that's fine in the event that died and he left over that require had to pay for it and this is what we And continued and he said another was as follows that if dies and they want that his should be paid for by the but what do you see from here you see that who pays for his now it's that pays for that is the but the problem is then the that we brought earlier said that it was you have to say they're both true. You have to say it's a how could they both be true? The answer is because there were two that played itself out as follows. It started off was born from the but what happened was at some point it started getting very expensive. It started putting a lot of stress on the you know what that happened Rashi says it happened where every year they used to recycle a new and as a result they were always appointing new and it's for that reason they had no choice to come up with another plan it was just too expensive theans always coming from the again if once in a while there's this interim situation it's not the end of the world but if it's happening uh on a daily basis as it was happening way too often. So it turned into an they said that the during this interior should be bought from the but then they saw the weren't paying for it and the was being bought and this is a carbon that's supposed to be common in the mika they decided to reinstate either way there was a before and an after it was but then they were they had to reinstate it that says it was he was talking about the original in the Mishna it says it was a and he was talking about after they were they reinstated it that was a that was the reinstatement either way so we just mentioned this so we continue discussing it that another one of the takas was they said that there should be no on the of the in other words if someone is someone has personal benefit from hectish so we know this is a big problem ma is one of the paras But they said that the of the shouldn't be subject to the laws of sounds like this was a waiting this is not a this is it to the it says regarding so from the fact that it says we learn that there's a just like this but from the fact that it says he he is an exclusionary word we learn from here on the actual but there's evil on the but the bottom line is you see a why did this have to be said the same type of mean they're both true that we just mentioned but what happened was people started being mazo in the you know what they used it for they would use it as some sort of wound care they had a macaka So they would use the apher of the paradum. Now that's something that you find in the is that apher was used as something to treat a wound. You could imagine the school of people would have attributed to using the apher of the par aduma. Right? So what happened was people knew that there was no is on the apher the paradum. So they started using it for their wounds. And felt that was a zill in the apher of the paradum. Right? You know there were a lot of that were made in terms of treating the with incredible sanctity. So this was deemed as being a therefore so made that even though there's no let's treat it if there's but then felt that that backfired. You know why? Because there were people that were suffic and they refused to allow the aum to be sprinkled on them. And the reason is because they thought that the of the for the now there really is no for the parad but just made a ton as if there was. So they said one second there's an isa I'm a m I don't want the a for the paradum and they just looked away from the safikma which is an interesting thing. So they were so worried about the is that they ignored the suffik and yet people that was suffal realized that's not a good thing like they said let's reinstate the and that is that really there is no so the bottom line is that the said it sounds like it was a ton that there should be no I thought it's a so the answer is it's both true it was a dind But because of circumstances, it had to change. It had to shift. And [snorts] then made a to go ahead and to unwind that shift and to say that no, there was going to be no. So you're right. It was also on some level that up on it. So as it relates to the so this is talking about did but they did it because misled that's the is when that was either souda says that being that this carbon was bought from the every member of the had a chip in they had to be so they did this campaign and everybody contributed It says no, they were brought from the chumas. You didn't have to go ahead and and give a a separate donation, but it was more from the now this is a little bit similar to the Mishna, right? In our Mishna we're talking about, we have this interim period says it's paid for by the says the is paid for from the said it was paid for by the here too. Is this extra collection? Is that why we're mentioning this here? It's from Shimuda similar. No, we'll see in a minute the real reason why we're mentioning it. Either way, we learned that a just the opposite that is the one that said and is the one that said we have a steer says which is the latter of the two bryes. And the reason we want to know which is the latter of the two bryes because whichever is the latter of the two bryes of that's what we're going to pass in like and the reason is because we always pass in based on the wish right a and b we also know when there's a we so we need to know which was less to know which is the real to know what the real is so the sayashi rightashi is the of the so is probably the one that's overseeing this question, right? We have to know. So they told I think the first one makes sense to be the last one. You know why? Because we find that shim was in the first [snorts] says his brought from the why says the probably because feels that if you're not going to use the it's never going to be brought the reason it's never going to be brought is because people will be right people are going to just not bring it and you see then is he would say let's bring the for the same reason because he's again you see the t connecting these two says the I think that the first must be the right because that I think is predicated on being and I know from the is that is but told him no could be the second version was the latter version that's the main one I if that's the case by and it seems like he is when it comes to the last that's when there's no meaning is not gaining anything from it they're not getting aap from it so over the he's not when it comes to the people themselves that are paying for it need which is the latter of the two says which one do we pass what's the real to know who we ask is overseeing this right you can see this playing out so I have a brace as now this is talking about the carbon and refers to it as I'll say this is the from all the carbonas that were brought this was the one but there's a certain repetitiveness in the carbon it's coming to be additional that they're treated like And who said this that learns from a that if this shim is learning it from a PK it's probably the final R shim because if it's learned that from a PK then this is probably the real R shim. that this is the real that means the real is that the were paid for by the which means the real is that there was a separate collection and if that's the case we're going to pass in like that which means which was the last one it was it was that first that was really the last one either way moving along to the last part of the da which really goes back to the Mishna the Mishna had said So in the event that there's an interim situation with the right so the died and they were not yet a new so the question is what do you do with the so we had the eta etc the first 35 minutes of today's but the Mishna continued and the Mishna said that in addition to had when it was brought in interim braces it was brought. So I just think to set up the gumar now is going to discuss a few different shas regarding question number one in the morning and in the evening but nothing was born in the evening. So again the was a unique carbon in that it was brought in the morning and the evening but it was unique also that the carbon was divided into half. It was so there was one with three lugan of she and of right whatever all the ingredients were and they took half of it in the morning and half of it in the evening. So here's the question means that it's I'm sorry or means you bring the whole thing in the morning you bring nothing in the evening. The next question is what about with regards to the what about with regards to the she is that also going to be doubled is that not going to be doubled it's totally really in the first is it so again really the latter part of the daf is going to try to get a better understanding of how the kavita was brought in the event that there was no ken says had the following question. So was in the morning in the evening or was in the morning and nothing was born in the evening. I'll bring you discusses that there were 13 that were engaged in the going through all the ethan what did he do? He was engaged in the that's what he did. Now says the demor talking if you're going to tell me that the that in the event that there was there was no brought him because and nothing was brought then sometimes the is not going to be bringing the Right? Because in this situation there's no [snorts] the says the always brought says always. What do you mean? You just gave me a situation where nothing's brought which means there's no bringing anything. So isn't this arrived in the fact that it's from the was always that when we say which is also it must be told they heard what Roa had said and they told it over to him respond these foolish Babylonians because they live in a in a dark land they say that's dark why he said that sounds so silly this is a he said I'll prove to you It says the seventh was engaged in the of the let me ask you a question or the of the right of the he said she or the ninth was involved with the came with the is there always a and always a it's not true because we know say it says We learn from there that sometimes it was brought by night. It could be brought on another day, right? It could be brought. It didn't even have to be brought on the same day. So, how could you tell me every single day there's a that's bringing the of the came with the carbon and there's a chi that's bringing the came together with the of the carbon. It's possible that there's no at all. It could be being brought on the next day. Ella, what do you have to say? The Eli Katar I know it's possible that that's what's going to happen. That's not usually what happened. Usually was brought on the same day. And the Mishna is talking about what usually happened. We're not talking about in the event of these far-fetched scenarios. asked about what would be in a case where maybe the die. So again tells over to that said I have a riot on is one of the and his makes his way to and says I have a riot from the says the was always engaged in the what do you mean it's possible but they're not bringing anything. So he hears about this, the word gets back to him and he laughs. He says, "Ah, this is the way you want to know why we live and so it seems that word got back to what's response was." Said, "I'm embarrassed. Why do you only tell over the bad things we say? You should say the good things we say." In other words, a little that his wasn't the best and he was from here he was he was but afterwards said no I got to think I was saying good now maybe not the as we'll say but I'll call upon him I think the I said and that is that it was I stand by that you know why says that we treat the like the and the was brought every biker and every ber This two would have to be brought every sounds like maybe he's okay with but at the same time I got right though what's the bottom line right sometimes you find after drama here this drama had a mish scoffed at was initially then so we need a little bit of regrouping and we need to say okay what's the bottom line and this is sort of checkmate by the way this is a oneline excerpt of a longer that the is going to bring at the very very end we're almost finished new topic sort of as we'll see it's all and we're going to come back to where we started so with regards to every it's a little bit tricky because till now we've been talking about the that's being brought by the by the where the was made now we're talking about a regular So the came with how much said that there was a of in the morning and a evening. It was a full one just like the was when it came to it was the same thing. So again we have and regarding the component of the according to it's a full in the morning full in the evening it's a happy but it's a full of no it's a happy it's also a half of what's I never found that's right said you ever found I never found such a And as a result must be a fullness in the morning fullness in the evening. I never found one that needs two and being that the two of the half of together make up one and it has to be it's going to be one. Therefore it's in other words there's an anomaly going on over here. This is an anomaly is a tremendous apitz anomaly. The question is where does the lev play itself out with regards to this anomaly? Right? That's what's going on over here. So according to he said I mean to me the anomaly of a is a much greater anomaly than having two being brought with one isan. Therefore in the morning comes according to the anomaly of bringing two for one is a bigger anatomy than bringing a half a kit. I'd rather bring a half a kit and oh by the way we know there's a half a kit with this Indian anyways. is a happy and so it's happy. Why can't it be half a kindness of bottom line is this is the either way we're now going to move back to the and figure out how much had to be brought when it's being brought on an interim basis according to the holds that when the live and you're bringing them and you're bringing And we know that as it relates to the interim it's done differently than when there was somebody because whereas the regarding the when it came to the interim it was so here's the question we double the shear as it relates to the on the interim basis and by the way we know we double it because That was See, here's the question. Just like we double the is on the interim, do we also double the or do we not double the so again where we're going to double the it's going to be that was the mas of the previous who hold that as relates to the So, do we say that just like we double the we also double the lie or do we not double the what's the do we say like we just spoke out that we're doubling the double we have for but we don't have anything for the so we can go ahead and we could double the now Rashi speaks out that the sh was only according to the raon right according to the raon who hold that it was always Do we double it or not? But that it was always a full then there was never a shadow. What's the reason? So apparently says there's no that you're going to bring two in the morning and two in the evening. No one ever heard of two at the same time. There's no such in the world two for one. But to bring two that's like 101. There's no sh one. So as a result that's not even a so if you double it it's only a and as a result that's the sh do you do that or not another sh the what about regarding the shemen so the three of that we know from yesterday that was brought together what's the half of the right? Everything was cut into two. So it was the half of the three lugan in the morning, half of the three lugan in the evening. But now in the interim, we're doubling the share. So if we're doubling the share, we're doubling the silus. Maybe we should double the she and say it will be a full three and a full three in the evening. And notice this is a question. Right? There's no reason this should be different according to abend because aband agrees that it was half of the three half of the three. So if you're going to double it, you could double it according to aband as well by the lava where aband holds it was a full share of lav in the morning. So there's no minute to double it because that would mean twoes of lavo. We never heard of such a thing but as it relates to the shemen they're in the same boat. So if they're in the same boat I could bring the three lugan in one shot. I can bring it in two shots. Hence the shila. Do we double it or or do we not double it? Is it going to be three lug of bab with the fully or is it going to be no it's going to be a fully but as it relates to the she then already not. So again two shas that wants to know we're doubling the it's going to be the just said but in the we've clarified that it means and the question is what do we do with the and the question is what do we do with the she do we say that just like we're doubling the is meaning we're bringing a fully sun in the morning a fully sun in the evening to we're going to double the you know There's going to be a full kits in the morning, full evening. And the gor clarified that's only a sh according to that holds ordinarily was a second question is what do we do with the do we say it's a half three of in the morning and half of in the evening like by the regular or just like regarding these going to be a full three of and a three of says I think I could be from the go five types of and it mentions all the different times where you could have a you know what it doesn't mention it doesn't mention anything about the in the event that it's being brought in this interim basis that you're going to bring a full in the morning full in the evening now is not mentioned on the Mishna but partially the reason it's not mentioned in the Mishna even though it involved the because it was brought half the kindness at a time and the Mishna only mentions where it was a fullness but if you're going to tell me means oh so regarding the it's not five it's actually seven because you have the that's being and then you have the that's being but that's not a kasha because I could always tell you that the katan that's already a de and katan this is only in the event of it's not a normal case that there's this interim kangado so for an interim kangado maybe the mission is not talking about that said he also was sitting and he said over this specifically from that they didn't double the was there and you look at that it actually mentions a one of the it mentions is if someone's of someone's that's the that's to do it's not something you're supposed to do curse if you do it so obviously that's a and it says it's how can you tell me you see is a so because it is he says maybe uh you do have to be pit from there I'm not sure bottom line theor says my now this is an interesting myavia because usually myav would be where we tak don't know what to be pushed here. It sounds a little bit like we did know what to be pushed, right? Because was from the was but then the said you can't tell me because it mentions which is a but either way says we still don't have a clear I guess somewhat murky. So what's the bottom line comes to the rescue and he said I'll bring you from by the way in the previous when we had the sh of this is also my and that was also my right identical signon and it's actually the same exact bryce but dear just had like an excerpt from the bry here we bring the bry in totality says the and by the way and they were not meaning they would bring the fully sin in the morning and they bring the fully sin in the evening. This is the excerpt of the brides that had been brought earlier. Additionally, There was a that was brought and there was a brought. Sounds like we're getting a little riot here. And there would be three. They would bring right half of the three in the morning and the other half of the three of says who is the meaning is it or is it the is it who holds that every single involve in the morning in the evening or is it the on that hold that every involved in the morning and in the evening that there was always one if this price is going according to the why would the Bes say that they would bring a in the morning and a in the evening is it's only in the morning in the you would have to say it's because here we're talking about when the god will die And you would say that being that we're being double on the actually we're doubling the oh and that would be like we'd be but here's the problem because if you're doubling the why not doubling the she and the price is very clear that the itself is the is but the she divide if we going with the that really the is supposed to be we're doubling it because the die that's the of the then why you only doubling the why you're not doubling the you have to say you have to say the price is going according to who it's going according that really you're not supposed to double the why then is there is because that's always what the And and according to him, you don't double the which by the way was never you should double the remember according but the bottom line is you see that you don't double the the she right because you keep the she in half. Now being that you see you don't double the according to it makes sense that according to he also wouldn't double the bottom line is said to me it's that this price is going according to the it has to be because you see that they doubled the and they didn't double the she must be really you don't double anything and the only reason the is double because That's that you always bring the full share full but the bottom line is you see you don't double the according to if you don't double the accord you're not going to double according to the and you're also not going to double the according to the so the bottom line is you see that that the was doubled but as it relates to that was not doubled and said you want to know who we like regarding We passed the story that it was a full comm say that we learned in the and it didn't mention what and it didn't mention. So you see clearly this is not like now this is because even though we brought this earlier and earlier was don't bring from this was but this is not a every single day and it doesn't mention one word about it must be because like and if that's the case And how could that hold? Soar says what it always says when it asks a like this was many asks from something said in this rule says and on that note an epic. So what's the of today's? So the topic of today's d was the specifically when the died they were not and the question is and really if you take it from the top and you work through the entire there were a lot of things that were discussed. Number one is who paid for the according to the paid for it. According to it was paid for by the we had a price that brought the respective learned it from a par of learned it from the fact that it says holds it says there was a before and an after and a before again. But either way the first big question is with regards to the in the interim basis who pays for the coin to it was paid for by the second major discussion was how was it brought? So the said but the question is or maybe it was only brought in one shot and was from that it was so it was a full shear in the morning a full share in the evening. Interesting. Here's the next question. The next question was so they double the amount of is right the is one share half in the morning half in the evening when it's being brought on an interim basis it's one full share in the morning one full share in the evening it's literally d but the only that we have for doubling it is regarding the silus it's the what about with regards to the what about with regards to the shemen did they double that or did they not double that so what what's even the so with regards to the How much it was brought? It was a full in the morning, fullness in the evening. According to the it was a half a in the morning, half a kit in the evening. The question is according to the did they double the meaning a full in the morning, a full comming or did they not? Additionally, the she so there was three lugan of she that was yesterday's d that were brought with them but it was only half one and a half in the morning one and a half in the evening. question is now that we're doubling the silus are we doubling the she and are we not doubling the sheet brought the same first time he only mentioned one line of it brought the longer version of it and that is they did not double it so they doubled the is they did not double the they did not double the she and really it's this the all the different types of the classic when the dies in the middle of the day and they point the new where they didn't appoint the kangaldo right away. It's in that way that ends. So it began with the tites and it ended with the ism. Tomorrow we're going to start the fifth per of