Menachos 5

Today's is and we are five lines from the top of today's being learned as a formal and today's also being learned as a for that you find. So we're moving along in the first suga of vanis which as we've seen mirrors the first suga of and that is the said any where the or one of the Other critical avoid the is the is going to be a she says you could eat the you could be m but the bim who's bringing this for some will not be able to realize that it's with the exception of the two if they're brought to not only is the bim not going to get whatever is he needs to get. But the carbon is going to be possible. can't eat the you can't be the it's yesterday's we saw on the bottom of that rav added another to the list said with the was done is also going to be possible and the reason is because what was the purpose of The it came to be the if the is that means it's not being m anything if it's not being m anything then it's nothing and if that's the case by definition it has to be possible I said the didn't say that the said is with the exception of the it didn't say with thecept caption of the and the and the gave three technical reasons of why maybe the is beyond the scope of the that are being discussed in the Mishna but at the end of the day Rav said and that is that the or one of the other critical it's going to be possible we saw that Rav said that my that I'm saying would extend itself to the world of as well which ordinarily if brought is said I'll tell you two for I believe it's going to be possible the and it's for the same reason because those two they're coming to be matter something the is coming to facilitate the nazerus. The ashams is coming to allow the mitz to re-enter Isra being that those purpose is to facilitate something and right now they were brought in a way where they can facilitate that thing because it's for that reason by definition they are going to be possible either way the topic of today's d is going to be different shittas within the two additional as relates to the ratio of Ra's that was brought to that isle based on it's coming to be in today's we're going to see the as it relates to the was brought additionally we're going to see the of as it relates to the that was brought what is going to emerge is that really just like Rav's is a in the is also going to be a and is also going to be a one last point that's worth just reiterating before we start the d and that is what exactly was the was a carbon it was obviously a it was brought once a year on and the reason it was brought was to be one of the says in the he now let quote unquote now how does that relate to that's something we actually have many rabbites on it's from the most controversial topics of all time but for sure once upon a time there was an is and in order to be m that is a carbon had to be brought that carbon was the carbon ma so before the ma was brought brought you couldn't eat the moment the was brought at that point you were allowed to eat the either way said where the was done so far that's what the Mishna said however what added to that was in however despite the fact that it's kosher will not be allowed to be eaten unless another is going to be brought. This time it's going to be brought properly without and that will go and that will be in other words is a little bit from the it sounded like with the exception. What does kasha mean said in the you could eat the and you you could be mit said that no when it comes to it's actually going to be possible. You can't eat the you can't be mocked of the kits. Rishlish went and he cut the baby in half. He said that it's going to be kosher from the standpoint that you could be mocked to the kiteets. However, it's going to be puzzle from the standpoint that you won't be able to eat the but the lumbness of why if really it's still you won't be able to eat the is based more on the fact that until the was brought the itself was and what was matter the it was the well to the extent that the was brought to and now it's so it doesn't have the ability to be if it doesn't have the ability to be you're not going to be able to eat the just to clarify the point not because of the it's more of a it's because they now let it eat rav said that if you bring the then the itself is a pos the reason you can't eat the is because it's and by the way you can't be either because it's holds like this that it's not considered the only time renders and as a result for Sure the is going to be and that's why if you want to be the heck of the it just so happens there's a study there's an external reason why I can't eat the because to the extent that it was like to the extent it was so there was nothing that was not the there was nothing that was not the it's that it's regular and just like I can't eat that I have in my pantry I wouldn't be able to eat. But the asks if that's true that even though it's you can't eat the because it's well if that's the case then how could you then go and take the and put the on the we know there's a that underpins all of and that is learned from can say that says quote unquote from those words that the only thing you're allowed to put on the is something that you yourself are allowed to eat and being that you would not be able to eat the so how could it be that the you could be the to the extent that it's not with regards to being able to eat it because there's an then you shouldn't be able to put it on the just to clarify this point as well it requires a little bit more every single time the of the was put on the at the time you put it on the it was right and as a result you could say isn't there a problem of what was okay so at the time that you're putting the obviously you weren't m yet so chicken and an egg it's a catch 22 right and as a result there should be a problem the terror says that's not fair it's because It's the and the are all coming but this is not being lockish holds is still going to be if that's the case you have a real problem I hear the lness ofish it's very but at the same time how could you go ahead and be m to this what happened to the bra holds in now this idea is an idea that we've seen many times in first time we're seeing it here in the application of it here is as we'll say so what does it mean what is saying is that being that later that day you're going to end up bringing the again and this time you're going to do it with the right and as a result you're going to end up being m the so what emerges is that even though this second when I'm putting this on the it's not but now it's not but in 3 hours it's going to be what's going to happen in 3 hours I'm going to go ahead and I'm going to be mocked or proper as a result because it's going to happen today why is it gonna happen today because I have a mitzvah to do it today so it's for that reason we don't look at it as being Why is this a application of throughout when the is always applying it to a situation where this thing that's going to happen is going to happen and when is meaning when it's 9:00 in the morning and something's going to happen at 11 o'clock. Okay. Aller is two hours, right? Time flies. It's the Mas and as a result and I could see up now what's going to happen in two hours but over here I'm not just I'm rather know that that is going to happen today I hear but it's not happening automatically stating that it's one of the we're going to see in today's that there's an idea of that emerges from and that is that even though this thing that's going to happen later today is going to require but here's the bottom line what's to the extent that this doesn't have the ability. So it should be a problem. The terror says being that it's going to be later today because lady you're going to bring a proper is from a price. So the B is comparing and contrasting and the B said there are certain that you have you don't have you don't have what do you find can be brought to two together can bring a knife but additionally there's an idea that sometimes somebody needs and the way he's going to get kapar is by bringing a carbon and the carbon is going to be a knife the world of you by if you want to read the parenthesis even says it you never find that someone's and he's going to bring a now there's an idea that could be but in the world of that's not something you ever find that that is going to come about additionally you find by an idea of something that really should beer but in the world of Kachan it's going to be what's that thing that you find so Rashi says Malik would render the but when it comes to it's right all three of these things is not is never going to bring and by you don't find the idea of the price continues I'm going to show you certain things that doesn't have number one involve as opposed to The didn't require any kay the was done with the fingernail and then they took the itself and they did the mitz or the it didn't involve any clich is not something that you had by you can have a you never have a that was brought all these things as we just mentioned doesn't apply One of the that we said that has over is that where do you find you find you're going to tell me that what that was brought it's the but it's possible with regards to being able to eat the because of the fact that at the end of the day there's an I have a where is why is that? Because based on the fact that the isser right now really you should not be allowed to be mocked of the because it should be a problem of but we're saying it's says the if this is the case right this example we were saying a very because this is something that really should be but gives the very obvious answer and for the keep meaning the explained why there's no problem say really there should be a problem but it's what do you want me to do no actually rationalized it the explained it the so it's for that reason there is no problem now It's a but at the end of the day that's the case it's not passes by we're based on this is a when it comes to all of a sudden it's not an so it's something that in this situation is over here you don't have a because this situation by the would never be considered it doesn't have the criteria to have because of the fact that it's either way. So what emerges over here is that the ofish is really predicated on saying right didn't walk into medish to say walked into medish to be a third as it relates to understanding the brought right that was his from the it sounds like it's ra said it's possible and he said it depends as it relates to It's as it relates to the it's going to be possible. But what emerged is he has to hold. Why does he have to hold that? Because if he's not going to hold that, then his whole idea is dead on arrival. Because how could it be that the itself is yet you're doing a proper with the that is contradicted by the the even in a situation where you're not only really so the is going to ask now is really on the principle that came about on a derivative level from the of so we're not asking ahead on regarding in fact is going to be from a completely unrelated topic but you're telling me on that says was from the laws of the carbon so we know that the of the carbon the carbonus that he brought is from the more esoteric obscure parachutes in the so within the world of kchin The kachim of the mitz is very unique. It involved an asham and a katas. It involved blood. It involved oil. Some of it was put on his ears. Some of it was put on his thumbs. Right? There's a lot going on. So with regards to the sed of the we have a and it's from this the is coming to fire away. So in the event that the put the shemen on the before he put the dam. Now he did it in the reverse order because first he's supposed to put the dam and then you're supposed to put the she says he put the shemen in the place that you put the dam. So clearly implying that first he's supposed to put the dam then he's supposed to put the she but he did it in the wrong order. First he did the she then he did the dam. So says the br. So let me tell you what you're supposed to do. You malenu she refill the shement. The reason you have to refill the shem is because we're assuming if you put shem already you probably came with the requisite shear and if you put you don't have the shear anymore. So you have to refill it. Meaning there's no den of mu but it assuming you don't have the shear anymore. So therefore the bicycle goes out of its way and says you have to refill refill the oil and then put the she after you put the dam. So like this you will have done it in the right order. You would have had first the dam then the in other words the fact that you put the she before the dam means you did it the wrong way. Even this is a problem. So what you need to do is you have to essentially redo it. So make sure you have the proper amount of shem. Now put it on. So now the second sheman will have been done in the proper way. What happens if with regards to the sheman he did the matva first he put it on the bahin on the thumbs and then he did the matva he did the zikas that he's supposed to do with it. And that's also the wrong way because first he's supposed to do the matva the zikas with the shemen and after he's supposed to put on the bahas. So says the brace again. This is also a problem. refill the like this you would have gotten it right if you can tell me if you're going to tell me that there's no problem why do I have to redo it whatever I did was okay now this cash is also a little bit of a tricky kasha so explained the cash he said it's that the gammorra understands that The reason if you would do the sheman before the dam or the reason if you would do the matan is before the mb would be a problem is because it's not because there's a seder of how you have to do it that I have to do this before that and that after this it's a thing of the she is not until I put the d meaning there's a certain that I have to conform If all that is me to do it in the is and even when I have to do a what's the problem? So why is this an issue? I'm doing it now. It's not like I'm doing it tomorrow. I'm doing it today. So why do I have to redo it came to the defense of and he said don't bring because it says the word not but it says right it's something that has to be done exactly the way it's stipulated in the meaning even if the lus that you're saying is right and even though ordinarily but there's a special that when it comes to you have to do it exactly the way the delineates it and if the says you do this first and that second and that second and that third you have to conform to that and if you do it in the wrong order it's going to be a problem so after a papa the names matter Send it off says but you know what let me ask you or I mean not asking you it's a but this is again we're talking about the of the so he had to bring a kas and he had to bring an asham. Now as it relates to the katas and the asham that he brought he was supposed to bring first the asham and then the katas. So he went in the reverse order and he was saying he brought the katas first and the asham second. So the question is what to do now? So there's really two options, right? One option is just follow through with the katas and then afterwards you bring the asham. Another option is that no, why would you double down on your mistake? Take the katas and have someone attend to the dam, right? How do you attend to the dam? You have to mix it because otherwise it's going to get fiver, right? It's going to get hard and it's going to become uh viscous. It's going to get to a point where you're not going to be able to do his with it anymore. So have someone come, let him stir the pot, let him go ahead and miss it. And in the meantime, you'll go bring the asham, which is what you're supposed to do. And then when you finish being the bring the kas, meaning this person did the on the kas, and now all of a sudden there's an oops, right? What am I supposed to do? So again, there's two options. One is just follow through with the or no you messed up on the doesn't mean you have to mess up on the right or the which is the at the very least and do that later. So the price says that in the event you did that, which one of these two options? Drum roll. No, you shouldn't have somebody go ahead and bear. It's actually option C. It's none of the above. No, you have to just make it possible. There's no way to salvage this katas because before the kas. So if you did the katas first to follow through you're not going to follow through that first that we thought was a reasonable soundar is not even entertaining to have somebody miss it but rather now before you put something in the base you have to do right that's something we know from so make sure it gets deformed on some level like this it won't look like you're going ahead and burning a shiner piece of kchim once it's already turos it's not so nice anymore but the bottom line is that's what you're supposed to do so what's the kasha mus wrap up if you're going to tell me what that so what's the problem what's the grace over here even though it's true that before you bring the it's not this of but at the same time it's soon going to be this man and it's going to be this man that day so it's problem of so that's not an issue so what's the problem over here now this just to speak out the is also presupposing the same lumbness that Marag spoke out in the previous Gammorra and that is that the reason you had to bring the first and the Ka second is because you bring the man of the but is who cares what happened to say now who asked this kasha asked this kasha 12 seconds after answered almost the same exact kasha that asked this right this could ask but can't ask THIS and over here I'll tell you but says no this is why you have to learn before you learn I mean you can't appreciate this unless you're coming off 120 blood most said this is why was asking the he felt it could be it's true it says which says that the order matters but it could be it means that matter is not included in the so why does it have to be puzled which is the by the way. There you'll get the order right and then afterwards you'll bring a carbas the bottom line is knew the terret of he made up the terret he's the of that terrace he knows this terrors but at the same time at the same time he knew that this terrorist wouldn't work over here and because it is he has this bomb cash on it's a bombsh What do you mean was so bothered with this puppet said in order to understand you have to go back to the drawing board. So let's revisit that was brought it's and it's you can be it's however you can't eat it's but at the end of the day you never and as a result it is and therefore you're not going to be able to eat it has to you can't that means it's then it's not teaches me it has to the ter was that just knocked out that terret as a result needs to now come and replace a terrorist to that. So again he's not going to revisit in terms of altering's but to answer that we need a new terrorist which was a good terrorist doesn't work according to our elector holds it's because he holds that really the became first thing in the morning on and it's based on something that right this is and he said it together with his grace even when the stood that once it was at that point it was already now the longer version of this was later everybody knows that once upon a time when there was and so the was so there's no anymore. So what was hey you're playing right first thing in the morning at that point it was ready that even was there was a you're supposed to bring the carbon and that's the way is supposed to manifest itself meaning don't eat from the until you bring the carbon but just like works it's something that worked as well what's the point the point is that being that matter So when he's going ahead now and he's being this it's not a problem don't you need to be not that really hey you're playing now by the way speaks out that if you're going to tell me that hey you're playing is m so why do you say you can't eat why do you say you can't eat the can't eat the min I can't be mocked with the either nor hey you're playing Israel so I should be able to eat the shy So it's says really you could eat it. It's not real. That's the whole point of it's not really if there's no means I can eat the which is true but he said not ple but meaning it's not something you should go ahead and you should do because you're always supposed to wait until you bring the talking this who holds it here even you should know it's not something you ever said but it's something we deduce from something time we learn to this is so and were not brought he says was the so these two were not brought before the was brought by the way some have the gear not but just right because not a So again are always tricky but the before the and if he brought it it's going to be possible. What's the reason? Because before the was brought the and as a result the and the bringing are not for that reason this is going to be an issue and even it's going to be possible even before which was brought 49 days later right 50 days later even that you weren't supposed to bring these things before then it's going to be either way on this whole of not bringing the is only true that's only true on the 14th day of Nissan the 15th day of Nissan but once it's already the 16th day of Nissan even if you would bring the vasha it's going to be why would it be you need to be for it to be. So what's the answer is that once that point it's going to be and it's for that reason it's going to be okay. Bottom line is what's the second as it relates to the world of that was brought to first was rather the second says that but the is something that you could be put on is not because at the end of the day you wed the is something you could be there's no problem I isn't that a problem because if If you can't eat that means it's not to answer that was the majority of the first half of today's and really what emerged was the had two the first he said which we said is a very surprising it's a very n application of because usually it's going to happen in a couple of hours you got to do something it's not going to happen in a few hours but it's very very different but I feel second this is if you know the end shouldn't bother you has already matter and it's for that reason then you could even it's only said can't be eaten but you're asking me it's not really is either way the third sheet was going to be and not just that the is going to be allowed to be eaten. This is also a kadesh. So according to that's the yeah that's the first rash in the first right you know what means it means you're allowed to eat the is that you don't even need to bring another that's because I would say that for sure right it's for sure and if that's the case how could explain he said the reason does not render a carbon unfit. What do these three things mean? What a rubber mean when he said that is the only place that's so that's the his going to have any impact on the carbon and the reason is because he's not a this is the part of the we need as opposed to that's not the the ingredients that were used to bring the was something that ordinarily was like why because a very big the ingredients of the now what were the ingredients of the ordinarily was always brought so therefore even though here it's but we look at it as not and as a result there is no such thing as a when it comes to something that's not asks There was another time that was brought from that was said was only it's a whole different type of but either way that's what means and finally in the event that was so we know once it's theor loses it to a certain extent all the carbonas are going to be possible as a result if it was not a because it is going to be that it is not going to be a problem. The is not going to be but what's the bottom line? The bottom line is is that holds that the only time there's something called a is if it's as opposed to was not a why not because it was brought and ordinarily is not something that was ever is not something that was ever therefore the whole doesn't pass and therefore the it's going to be and it's even going to What are the threeas as it relates to the of specifically that was brought to from the it sounded like it's included in where is that if it was stating that came along and said that the was brought it's going to be possible said that the was brought is going to be that the are not going to be allowed to be eaten but as it relates to being the for that it's going to be the third and said that that's brought not only is it going to be not only could you eat the not only could you be the but it's Even so between and is that all three hold that even though from the it sounds like stating that stating that that's not the case. Now obviously if you go into all three of the is from shining sea it's from but what they have in common is that oh mighty a little bit from the way it would appear and that is it's not included in all the but rather the way we view them is is being different what the difference is we're going to stop here. So as it relates to raid, so the topic of the beginning of is the same as the topic of the beginning of and it's the of when has an impact on a carbon when it's going to be when it's going to be ple etc etc etc. One of the kadushim that is mvour in the beginning of and the beginning of as well is that in addition to the fact that has a negative impact on a carbon it's also it's also prohibited for a person to have a where do you see that I mean literally it's from the first of of right reading from why did the Mishna say what it should have said was said you want to know why the Mishna said it's coming to teach me that right it's coming to teach me that the itself despite the fact that it's the and therefore moving forward it would be to now by one of the subsequent and it's based on something said that the idea of is not only it's also a question of it is prohibited it's forbidden for a person to have a while he's doing one of the critical if you take a look at Rashi on the top of Rashi says that what's the what's the not allow says because it says and we learn from Now the says in the parish of that's the way the terra introduces the and the learns in the first par that teach me how I know there's a we learn from says you want to know why it's why there's an idea that it's prohibited for a person to do an with a is because it says And that is like is telling you how you're supposed to do it. And therefore you have to make sure that this is going to be meaning the para that tells me that has a negative impact on a carbon is good for the that it's also to do. You take a look at Rashi on the identical. Sashi over there says that you want to know why you can't have a when it comes to because the says in the second parag you're not allowed to have and it's learned from it says in the what's this in the second he's referring to so theor says How do you know that if somebody would have a he would get malus says in theory and being that it says that's to teach me that if you have you're going to get told if you have a bad thought you're gonna get malus ain't like isn't this So he told him back true when I said you're going to get I meant you want to know why you want to know why you're not to have a bad it's because of it says in the mean that it says we learn according to you would even get because of The bottom line is that's why you can't have a bad mash. In other words, we seem to have two rashies in on the very very same that is being this in two completely different ways. says that you want to know why you can't have it's because there's a so if there's a obviously you can't think it says it says in the is even one of the at first glance Why rash invas was mafarish one way was mafarish the other way. And really I think if you're going to ask the cash properly the cash is more than on is saying that you want to know why it's because it's one of the in the it says why did not learn the way that I think maybe we could be two very simple to explain which is we're going to see is going to go to the core of understanding some of of it's all based on from and that is the is says any person that thinks he's because it says there's a that's coming to teach me. You're not allowed to have what's the basement says the we have that included in the words that you shouldn't ruin the with a bad thought says the you know why because if a person would do anch and he would do it with a it would be the equivalent thereof to being. And it's for that reason this is not something that's okay. And then the goes on and on and on. And says that it's so interesting why the Rambam would go and give like an explanation almost like a for the Ram says if you have says and then the Ram gives an explanation I mean whatever you want to tell me it's like being it's neither here nor there at the end of the day have because it says in this very fancy reason like why is this something that even matters at first glance it's something that's neither here nor there and says it's to ever do something like this in his maybe in the but not in the what did mean when he said he says the with those words was coming to teach meal You know what he was coming to say? That although it's true, but the only time that's true is if the is going to make the carbon possible. But what WOULD BE IF SOMEONE HAD a but is that the CARBON'S GOING TO BE FOR example those are all said that was coming to teach you in that case you would not be over the because the only time this is is if IT'S WHEN YOU WERE m caught him on the level you can't eat the boser you can't eat the shir you can't be m you can't be m the in in a situation like that that's what the realm's coming to teach you it's there and only there that you're going to be but if somebody would be even though it's means your was it had a negative impact on the carbon but that's not something that you're going to be over. The Rambam wasn't just giving a muscle. What the Rambam was coming to do was the Rambam was coming to say that if somebody would have the is he would not be the I found in the from the first he clares this that we know there's a lab in the topic if the is something that would be true only by or in the world and maybe but the bottom line is that is it only then where it's actually ple but where it's maybe not maybe not maybe once you have I don't care if it's ple I don't care if it's kasher at the end of the day even when it's kasha you see you were mach It's like on some level it's not perfect. And if that's the case, maybe you'd be as well this is in peric days of it's the very very last excerpt of the last of days. I'm just going to read it. We're listing off a whole bunch of examples where and he did it. In all these cases, you're going to be over and you see that it's you're going to be over the but as it relates to the you're not going to be over the but it's over here a very big and that is the do you have the lab of when you're dealing with that was done or is it only the or it's actually going to be possible BECAUSE WHEN YOU NOW the is possible so then you have the but to the extent that you maybe over there not but that's over here we're discussing What does it mean that even though it's so you would have had a that maybe what maybe you can go ahead now and maybe you could go and maybe you could have a you can have a but what type of carbon ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? WE'RE talking about that by definition are we're not talking ABOUT THE WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT the because those things WOULD HAVE BEEN PARTIAL ANYWAYS. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING that's we're talking about something that could be right. So if we're talking about something that's and NOW IT'S couldn't say and the reason is like cuz the only time you have the you want to know why on such a carbon the reason is if we were handling over And the was saying actually would have said but we're discussing the and that the is coming to teach me that it's still going to be something that you're not allowed to do over there. You don't have the what is then the obviously there is but the bottom line is this and this has a beautiful but at the end of the day this could be is what's going on over here what's playing itself out between these two but maybe you could say another maybe you could Hey is discussing the right this is one of the few places where meets. So begins we know that the brings brings a Bryson forio that added to that he said that there were not four of but there were 13 of then the brings a Bryson for said there weren't 13 of there were actually of the goes and tells us according to what all the are Now when he said there 24 obvious so he counted them and the says we know is always it's always coming to exclude something you only count when there's something that you think should have been included in your ranking on your list that for whatever reason is being excluded. So the says as it relates to what's he coming to I just explained coming to the 13 and the 24 is 13 is coming to the other 11 but maxed that he gave you everything. So covered the whole spectrum. So what is he coming to? He's coming to if someone's a you would think he should be he should be included in the not on my list. Additionally obviously between the and the which one do we need? We need the right. So says the is telling me the number 24 cuz he wants you to know that mago is not going to be included. What does that even mean? So the background to a where the says that had while they were doing the so if they had as based on that so I have another example of and if somebody would have avas that would come with and based on that it should be included that a mago is not going to be included in the list and the says why not I mean it sounds like he should be included in the list says because not very much not and as a result we're not talking about and we'll deal with when we learn kach but and it's for that reason it's not included rashi on the word of the umago says something that uh is very hard to even say over with a straight face right this goes down as one of the most rashies of all time. Rashi says what does it mean that took the carbon of it and he was bringing and instead of he had in mind a schl is that what a mafago is a when you have a mind to do as what we know as it we have several raes going back to the beginning of time to try to be of this very very on this and other were very bothered was made the most basic error. It sounds like he's as really being he says he says I want to say maybe a little bit of and that is being knows what piggle is knows what is right and purposely touching pigle not as piggle but rather but there was a reason for it and the reason is because said I don't even understand how it's possible that the Mishna could say that had is that they're going to be the says in that if someone has that he gets now we know the rule is that a person is never how could it be that that are going to to the extent that they get based on the lab issue. So now already so based on that based on that there should be no the whole conversation in the saying to me this whole thing is a repellent said I know what you're going to probably tell me you'll tell me according to that holds which the said is the one that holds that is going to be. It's true. You're not going to pay M. You're going to get Malus. You're not going to get M because ain't no when the Mishna says in that. And when the Gar says, oh we're all going in THE WORLD OF THE because in the world of there is no malus because so there's no going to be. So sometimes it's a very obvious response, right? But at the same time it doesn't work. You know why? Because if you go through the Gar the Gar makes a certain certain clum certain rules as it relates to what is included in and then in the and then later in the and one of the rules is all of these things were things that had to work which means that why if the was entertaining to say that is one of the that means it would be True. Not only according to the that but even according to that old is yes like an olive. Well, if that's the case, then how could the entertain that you should be by being that holds an olive? You're going to get malus. Once again because you can't have because and you can't tell me that the garam wasn't the was only in because and the didn't say THE GAR SAID BECAUSE WHICH MEANS that really it meets all the affformentioned criteria. It seems it conforms with that means when the wants means this is what was bothering right we always talk about what's bothering this is what was bothering he couldn't understand that the over here is handling that you should be even what happened to the fact so you know what you know what Rashi said that must mean not you know maf must mean and didn't bother and says you know why I'll tell you is going to stand up the reason is because even though it says in the and the learns from the if someone has a bad you're going to get MALUS IS ONLY TRUE BY AVLE BUT is not included and says where does it say the word it says it in the pigle that's where it says it so really based on that Truth is there's another there's another we're going to talk about this in the next few days. It's a compar. What does it mean? Don't it's an isle and says if you look up this innovating this keeps on saying piggle piggle piggle. Why does it keep on saying piggle? Because the only time you're over a laugh when it comes to is if the is if however the would be over there not says that's why Rashi said because Rashi was trying to get at that how could it be and says that's why Rashi said that doesn't mean piggle but rather means means if there's no if there's no there's no problem. Therefore, therefore there's a sug. not included in truth is this which is more the it was written to the great guy it's a very cut from the guva it's very much related to this that we're discussing right now and over there he says this that he always held that it could be that the is not something that would apply to the lab of is something that would only apply It would only apply to piggle but not by the but the bottom line is if we have we learned and didn't just say it fleetingly. He says about and he bangs it out in that could be this no when it comes to that would be another says right is it says you're saying good you should have SAID BETTER YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID WELL YOU YOURSELF SAID ONE AGO that sounds the ter is obviously holds passes even that it doesn't pass. Again, we're not being the we're just coming to say in what the might be whether it's or whether it's and specifically is like we mentioned in the beginning of this is why would he not explain it based on why would he explain it better? Why would he explain it better based on the first mahalak was the first mahal was that it's based on the fact that it could be when it comes to carbon where it's not going to be over there there's no problem like was and like was more than maybe from the in the ender of of the that it could be not only is there no when it comes to the there's never when it comes to even by the right anywhere someone else a bad maybe you could say it's only going to be true but just to end and that is so just had a very big right he just said that if somebody would have by all he would not be over the love of Sounds like aesh right could be this is what's going on between these two and what should that sh be in what should be in whether there's a not this is easy it should be tolly in the brisk it should be tolly in the brisk with the that we also spoke about so many times and that is the brisk was without going through the whole that you learn that the The reason has a negative impact on a carbon is because a carbon has to be based on all the weed. A carbon has to be when you're took away the but was that really you can never take away the carbon because in the carbon and a carbon is always based on the stumble right before we knew stumbles maybe. But once you know stubble at that point you can never take away the of a carbon. Why then is it that a has a negative impact on a carbon it's a one of the other there's an that a bad can have a negative impact on a carbon and that's the of having a negative impact on a carbon. If you hold that the of is that it's a negative that a carbon just like a pigle then it's that should be included in the if however the of every is not your positive had a negative impact on a carbon but rather when you have a what you're doing is you're removing the and the carbon is being ple if that's the case it's p it doesn't pass means don't have a that's going to negatively impact the carbon I just explained even though when you have the bad and you remove the the carbon is ple but it's not punked the way it became ple was the was the it's not the of the It's possible in it's why it's possible. You want to know how it became through a bad it's not means don't have a that's being whether or not there should be when it comes to should be in the brisk which would mean that maybe these two and this is what's going on over here again this is all being said I'll just be one before the calls me out on this and that is that the truth is if you look here so it's the middle of the just to read words says like this how do you know that there's a it's going in from the beginning of the we learn it caution right we learned it from okay And if that's the case seems to be saying that the reason he's talking not about the laugh he's talking about it but the reason apostles is because it says it says in the who'selling to explain the we were learning up in the top of the is not bringing into the because maybe has no at least in the second has no when it comes to when it comes to clearly brought in not for the But be it for the in fact the briskov in his piece when he brings to his that one of his that he quotes is this on the bottom of B. So the briskar brought a from top of the base not the top rashi because I think the top rashi sounds like a kasha on the briskar. He brought a ray from the bottom rashi which would then mean we would have to try to reconcile these rashies again. The Indian over here is just to be mafal a little bit in two rashies that we have. And that is is not only a it's not only a question is a puzzle is it is not but is a question of as well. What is the martuser first glance says brings the whole of the first it sounds like didn't want which is the more obvious of course that's of course what should have said why did not say it we're being again for conversation purposes one based on the from and the And that is it could be the only time there's the only time there's a lab is when the carbon is going to be possible. over here we're discussing is but it's still we're handling something that over here it doesn't pass to say that he says in he says in that there is no there's no when it comes to what would that be in the issue is there's a rash on the bottom of that seems And by the way, this on the bottom of the saying that is not related to what do you mean? I have a rash on the first of the first two of that seem to say not that way. This may be between the and the is talking about the and he says when it comes to again The midday.