Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Menachos 2
0 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Today's t is
and we have in the beginning of a new
mus.
So just a little bit of an introduction
the primary topic of minus as its name
suggests is the carbon minus is plural.
So we know from learning
that not all carbon were created
equally. There was a carbon, a carbon
kas, a carbonim, a carbon, a carbon, a
carbon peskar,
one of the carbonos was a carbon min.
Now although a min is just in a way
another type of carbon, but if you think
about it, it was fundamentally different
than all the other carbonoids.
And the difference was really based on
its physical nature. So all carbonos
with the exception of the carbon ma were
a bal an animal a za
a kf an a bird but they're all living
beings that were being offered up and
sacrificed to the carbon was unique in
that it was a it didn't involve anything
alive. In fact, the key ingredients of
the minis were wheat, barley, oil, and
frankincense, whatever exactly that is
in lashes,
she and so just based on the physical
nature of the carbon ma, you know
already you're dealing with something
that's very very different. Now because
physically the carbon ma was so
different than all the other carbonoid
by definition the were done with the
carbon min would have to be different
than the avoid that were done with all
the other carbon for example you can't
sh
you can't do
with
and really
one of the most important things that we
need to internalize Guys, before we
start makis
is that the
of the is going to be completely
different than the sedo of the stating
that
although the physical avoidance of the
had to be different than the physical
avoidance of the of the other carbon.
However, the of the very much mirrored
and paralleled the of the so for example
one of the most basic tenets of
that
and those were avoid that those are the
avoid during which uh if he has a bad
such asma or piggle whatever it might be
can impact the cautious of the carbon.
The carbon also had dollar not the same
dollar but also dollar and the dollar of
the carbon are just as critical to the
as the are to the
other. So what were the of the carbon?
The first avoid was kits. After the
kayen did kamit, he took the kits and he
would put it into aaris. That was the
second aid. The third was the kayen
taking the kishar that has the kits in
it and walking it doing bringing it to
the misb. And then finally the fourth
aid is the taking the burning it being
on the so it's
taking the and put it into the
now notice these four avoid literally
parallel the four of the is the
equivalent thereof of putting the into
that would be the proverbial cabala
because that's really what kabala is
being the dominant
is the of the is identical to the of the
and being the is the equivalent thereof
to the if a would have
put the
it would impact the carbon in a very
negative way. If a would have a makle
etc etc during one of those avoid it
would be the same as if a cyan had a bad
a bad thought during the but the point
is again that although the actual
avoidance of the are by definition going
to have to be very different than the
actual avoidance that were done with but
at the same time they mirror each other
it's four and it's not just oh here four
therefore no each one of the four
directly corresponds to one of the four
avoidas that was done with the ze.
Additionally, we know there were other
avoidas that were done with carbon aid
that are extra credit that are not. The
two most notable ones were
and the other is the
carbon also had the equivalent thereof
of the
and of the
was the
so after the would be the on there was
always going to be leftover of the the
leftovers was eaten just like the
leftover baser of a carbon was eaten
with some exceptions.
So too the leftover of the was eaten
again with some exceptions. There was an
idea to take a of the
and be on the carbon had a as well. What
was the of the So this is fun. The of
the was the
interesting I thought was the equivalent
of the how did it become the equivalent
of that. So this is a very important in
the of
where we're going to learn brisket that
the
really wore two hats. represented the
it's the equivalent thereof of the it
also represented the because it's the
equivalent thereof of the but the bottom
line is you have the equivalent by the
to the you also have the equivalent to
the and to the now when it came to there
was some other that were done even
beyond the and
there was sometimes there was you
Right. There were other when it came to
the were other as well unique to the
carbon.
Exactly what these things are. We're
going to get to as we start learning the
suggest. But again high level the carbon
is fundamentally different than all the
other carbon in the sense that it's not
being brought from a bal. It's being
brought from a being that it's so
fundamentally different. Obviously the
are going to have to be different. For
starters it doesn't involve blood. A
carbon without blood is dead on arrival,
right? But when it comes to the carbon,
it's
a whole different type of carbon stating
that the avoid of the very much mirrored
and very much paralleled the
avoid of another thing that we're going
to see in the first 25 or so block is
that almost the entire
relates to as well. So again we
mentioned that this
and you have
you have you have some of the unique but
really it's all the
are going to relate to. So for example
there's a concept of pigle like we
mentioned there's a concept of noiser
there's a concept of and even some of
the nuance
or
right all the different that we learn
throughout are going to on some level
appear albe it in a very abbreviated
form. So when
wrote, they assumed you already learned.
Good thing we did because otherwise it
would be very hard to understand. But a
lot of the terms and a lot of the
fleshed out
in are going to be mentioned a lot more
over here. One other point and then
we're going to start and that is as it
relates to a min there are many
different types of minus
there's a minor
just like all carbon he could be a
carbon and a carbon there's a
where somebody can voluntarily decide
that he wants to bring a carbon and
there was sometimes a person was
obligated to bring a a carbon within the
world of just read the Eric B and
there was the
mavas the mares the masan. These are
very intimidating terms but really all
they are are different types of minus
and they're being prepared in different
ways. If you're a chef maybe you would
appreciate a little bit better what the
difference is between a mas and a mases.
One is a flatter pan the other is a
deeper pan. They're both fried as
opposed to the mafanner which is baked.
So again, these are all the different of
and really the nuance is in terms of the
way it was prepared in the world of
there's a whole list. There was the So
who brought the So that was the somebody
who's so poor he couldn't even afford to
bring
and he did an a which is one of the
three a for which a person brings the
carbon
that was a carbon that was brought by
the
was a carbon that was brought by the
every single day.
What does that term come from? So the
first day that a would do the he brought
a carbon to inaugurate his and the
carbon that he used to bring was a
carbon the
brought on
the
was a carbon
that was brought on is a carbon
this is a big one was a carbon that was
brought within that was brought with
many carbon. So for example an always
had to have with it the always came
along with a carbon but the bottom line
is there's a whole bunch of different
types of all of which literally every
single one is a topic and a over here
regardless the short version of the
is the last 11 minutes the longer
version
is which was the last four months and we
begin Now another maka which very much
picks up in a sense where the previous
maka left off. Now as it relates to the
first mishna here in
it literally parallels the first mishna.
It's what was the first
the idea that a carbon that's brought
could be a problematic carbon. all
carbonas that were brought
with the exception of the right that's
the opening verse of
is going to open up in a very similar
vein and it's going to discuss the idea
of and how it intersects with the
carbon. So let's just kaz her over. What
does it mean? Uh carbon has to be
brought. When is it that if a carbon is
brought it's going to impact the carbon?
So again it's the very first of
and really really it begins with a par
the end of the fourth par which says
that when would
he had to have in mind six different
he had to have in mind the type of
carbon that he's bringing. who the
carbon is. He had to have in mind that
it's being brought for.
So there was six that the had to have
when he was bringing a carbon. What
would be if a brought a carbon and he
had in mind the wrong so he didn't go
and have in mind the right but to the
contrary he actually had in mind the
wrong kavan.
The is that if the he had the
was in two of the six,
it was either in the ze or in the lash,
it could have a negative impact on the
carp. If it's on the latter four of the
then it has zero impact on the kashas of
the carp. So what is lash zak and lash?
is in the world of if you're bringing
you have to have in mind not have in
mind what's also known as you can't be
mash the type of kadusha of the carbon
that you're bringing right now what is
if ruin is the carbon you have to have a
mind that ruin should get from this
carbon not have a mind that shim is the
one that's going to get from the carbon
that's also known as in the event that
there's of when it comes to also
known as or
also known as it's then and only then
that we're even having a conversation
about maybe the negatively impacting the
carpet. If however the would be in one
of the other that really in a perfect
world the would have it's going to have
zero negative impact on the carpet. What
would be if the cayenne had no at all?
What would be if it was so that is
and the comes out that when it comes to
stomach is of is a problem but when it
comes to the of their stomach is going
to be so as it relates to what's the
when it comes to
only two of the really matter and that
is
also known as
also known as what is in the event that
the had a bad. So theoret
of is that
any where the
was going to be
however the bim is not going to get so
he's not going to get he has to go ahead
and bring another carbon meaning the
carbon's he could eat the buser he could
be but the bim doesn't get the kapar
he's supposed to get with the exception
of pes and that's as it relates
What's the relates to that is the very
first of
that is where we pick up
is every single
in the event that the was done
and it's
but it's any one of the four critical of
the carbon in the event that a was
brought and one of the
that correlate to
the evidence is going to be
however the is not going to satisfy his
obligation that he had with bringing his
carbon meaning he's going to have to
bring another carbon so the is going to
be
he could be the
you could eat the but as it relates to
the
he can't satisfy his obligation
with this
He's going to have to bring another
there are two exceptions to the rule
with the exception of the
those are two examples of and those two
the is
that not only if it was brought is it
going to be
but the is going to be that it is
actually going to be possible The
mission continues and says
as relates to the
which we just said that in the event
that the or really any one of the other
critical
it's going to be poss
or if it was put into the or was on or
could be it was done.
So it wasn't done 100%
it was done and
or it was done
it's going to be possible. So after the
Mishna says that are the exceptions to
the rule is that is going to be
possible. So the Mishna goes ahead and
the like drills down on a little bit.
First of all, even though the opening
sentence of the Mishna was
so clarifies that it's
right. Additionally, the Mishna says
that it's not only going to be possible
if it was done 100% chalishma, but even
if it was done a little bit and a little
bit and it doesn't matter if it was
or
the minute there's a little bit of by
any one of the four is
going to be possible.
What does it even mean?
It means simple where the was doing the
and he had in mind
he had a mind first to write and then
afterwards
he had in mind
what's an example of
the example would be where he had in
mind
and then afterwards he had a mind
so again he had the right and he had the
wrong
is that it's going to be possible. So
what's the first
it's the equivalent thereof to the first
in the first we learned that if one of
the
sometimes it's
and sometimes it's even possible and
focusing on the of that
when it comes to the it's actually going
to be possible when it comes to the
here too. There are two exceptions. What
are the two exceptions? The which is
similar to the right and the
that is the that the used to bring. So
when it comes to it's always
when it comes to the it's always
and that's the first thing. The second
thing is based on the introduction that
we mentioned that's the of our is only
talking about where the wases
or it was
even though
but as relates to the
having a negative impact be it
or be it even worse it's going to be
possible the only time those things are
true is if the shu was or the shu was au
If the shinoid was in one of the other
it's not going to have a negative impact
on the cart
here and this is parallels the first of
discusses in terms of the
is the talking about or is the Mishna
also talking about now just to explain
that's part that the of the is true for
however wants to know
the Mishna you're going to touch the
Mishna properly is the Mishna discussing
only
or is also discussing Bible now how does
know it's for sure talking about because
the Mishna gave examples
and
if you had in mind
and when you were bringing a right or
vice versa so it's clear that the Mishna
is talking about where you're bringing
one type of you're having mind another
type of which is what we know as so the
Mishna is for sure talking about places
whether the Mishna is also talking about
but again that's only semantics that's
only as it relates to how to read the is
the
or the
but as it relates to the
of the relates to and of the relates to
one other thing that's worth mentioning
it's a rashi it's a matter In fact, it's
the first rash of and that is Rashi says
what's the case of
so says
the case was where someone is bringing
and the instead of having in mind
he had in mind a truth is without
looking at you could have thought that's
not he's bringing a he's having a mind
of oh he's bringing a he had a mind of
the between the and the you don't think
is in the carbon you don't think it's in
the definition of the carbon it's just
in terms of how it was baked how it was
fried how it was prepared you use this
pan and you use that pan it's that and
on some level are fundamentally
different and as As a result, when the
Mishna says,
that too would be included in other
words, it doesn't have to be in order
for it to be even
alone would be enough for it to be
considered
either way.
So the began
So begins the exactly the way begins the
same exact words verb
with a very subtle dick that is
felt that grammatically speaking it
might have been more appropriate to
simply say
is like a little bit dramatic that the
only difference is or the only is that
it's
we don't have to get that excited
however not
the only thing is however but you should
know that it's although the Bible if you
look And
Rashi says that the reason the feels
that it should have said and not is
because of the
is the one that said it
that there's an Indian that should
always try to teach
he should be less worthy not more worthy
is a little less wordy than
as a result as a result is
which is the
it should have said which is the
you want to know why it said not because
there's a not such subtle that the town
of the mission wanted us to know how
the town of the mission is coming to
teach us that in the event that a was
brought
The is that it's going to be in fact the
only part of it that's not
the only thing that's not perfect is
that it's like
but other than that you need to treat
this as if it's 100% a carbon the last
words we just read that it would be user
to go ahead by the next and deviate from
the proper way of doing it. meaning
there would have been a mean that once a
carbon is brought with
maybe you could do the next with
why because it's broken already anyways
once it was brought with
it's going to be worse if you're going
to do another
that's what the Mishna was coming to
address and the Mishna said that it's
meaning the only part of it that's not
is that it's
but as it relates to everything else is
that
for that it's going to be treated 100%
like a carbon and the says that this
idea that it's
even once you had
something that once said
was
you not let do this even though was not
already you would have maybe I could do
this
said if you want you could explain it or
if you want I could even find you
apostrophe. You say what would be the
very simple
just because you made one mistake does
that mean you should make more mistakes?
People make mistakes in life. It doesn't
mean just because you made a mistake in
life you should double down. Right? So I
did the let me do this. No, you did the
I did the and make sure you get this
right.
Or you could say if you prefer I'll even
find you a it says
now this P RA said at first glance is a
little bit of a hard pic to read because
the seems to be talking about one carbon
and it refers to it as a
now is it is now and are synonyms of
each other but not not the same A nether
is where somebody says is where someone
says
nether who it's a nether yet
the seems to be referring to it as
you know what this is coming to teach me
somebody said
let's say and then he went ahead and
brought the and was brought
so then the is not going to be treated
like a regular but we're going to treat
it as a cusher carbon alit like some new
carbon. So
if when you said
you had in mind the nether it's going to
be a satisfaction of the nether that you
made and if not we're going to treat it
like some new carbon not the carbon that
you were obligated to bring it's going
to be a carbon and
are you allowed to go ahead and be a
carbon
the answer of course is no that's a
rhetorical question and as a result says
at if someone did
and that is the that the town of the
Mishna wanted us to know and how did it
teach it to us in the most subtle of
ways
not
which would be the way that the Tana who
likes to speak would have ordinarily
spoke but rather
meaning the only aspect of this carbon
that's not perfection is the fact that
it's but other than that you have to
treat it like a regular carbon therefore
a regular carbon
this too is going to be as well not for
now but I am related rabbites we spoke
about this in
the last that is a big discussion
amongst the
labramski
Whether the idea that a carbon that's
brought
is that true only foresh or is that true
for as well what would be the to be
between
because once let's pick an case has a
at that point even though it's but the
one is that it's
if it's
that means let's say Carbon is not going
to get any from it. If he's not going to
get from it, you could hear he's not the
bum anymore. If he's not the what would
be the problem to do this
presupposes there's a but once the of
this carbon is that it's
that would mean that he's not the
anymore. If he's not the violent then
maybe there should be no problems
in a letter to argued this
brought a
brought it's of the
whole discussion I'm related it's moving
along so again up until this point it
felt like we were just
on
now it's going to feel a lot more like
It would seem at first glance that our
was done.
And not only are they but they're even
said every single where the was done is
and it's even
and said even though I know when you
learn that's not the way it is right in
the best case scenario it's
in some situations it's even going to be
possible but
are not like this is like the
introduction Right?
Sounds exactly the opposite of what we
spoke about in the introduction. But
this world in world he said are not
because let's say somebody would do
and he would have in mind
his actions
that really what he's doing is is
meaning
and like we said are physically
different right if you look at them they
they look different as a result says
If somebody would do a and he would have
in mind, I'm not so misspelled from
that. You know why? Because I'm looking
at what the person's doing and I see
that he's really doing a he has in mind
doesn't impress me because it doesn't
confuse me. It's not like, oh my gosh,
what is this? Is this a I know exactly
what is a with a weird that this
person's having right now. But
So the
doesn't bother me.
If somebody's bringing a
was a that was dry, it was it didn't
have any oil. And he has a mind that
he's bringing, it means it's blue. It's
mixed with oil. There too the doesn't
impress me. And the reason is because
you see that it's you don't see the oil
over here. And being that there's no
confusion. you're not throwing me for a
loop at your so it's for that reason the
is not place else now the longness of is
not for now but what's the bottom line
said that when it comes to
being that
over there
is neither here nor there
when it comes to when it comes to said
is a problem and the reason is
the bottom line is
is that when it comes to
like would you think the mission is not
like now two things number one where do
you see that the mission is not like you
see it
says because what's the
exception
where they're actually possible
according to it's always
the there are times that it's possible
and even when it's
according to it's never possible and
when it's even
so that's strike one strike two right
it's
where you find that the Mishna is the
corruption the second thing we have to
speak out is
the shim. Is there another way to learn?
This is not a lame layer
of should we say that the is the I mean
to me if there's ever been a delay this
is it the began
and said
I don't know why this is being said
what's in the
right? Throw in all the adjectives, all
the cliches. This is very much the lake.
The answer is the he of the gar. And
really, in order to appreciate the he of
the gumar, this is actually interesting.
Really in order to appreciate the rest
of today's daf, we're only going to
learn about another eight or so lines.
But the only way to appreciate the rest
of today's daf, you have to learn
tomorrow's daf. So it's a little bit.
So we'll just speak out bal a little bit
what's going to be happening in the
beginning of tomorrow's d and then we'll
learn the end of today's and then next
time tomorrow we'll learn the beginning
of tomorrow's okay so the is going to
ask a steer in
said
is going to say
there's a steer in
fact has a bra where shim said that
thera compares the to
and to the and quoting from a that's in
the middle of that
says that why did we compare the to the
and the to the because
there are treated like and there are
treated like
is like the
And just like the
talking said that Terry compares the you
know why it's negl
is
there's certain that are
and then there are that
is possible the
or the are going to be
and that we just mentioned now would
seem to blatantly contradict the we
started with and that is
now the is going to bring three tuts
from to answer the stro between these
two ribs raashi and ra respectively
is going to say a very technical
and that is that when said that
is that's when he had in mind not
using the word in the
so rash's example of a
If he would have
a problem when said that
is okay that's when he had in mind
so he didn't say the word
he just said or thought the word
then it's cautious again when says
is when he didn't use the word when says
it's a problem. It's when he used the
word is going to say
holds that is
going to be a problem is going to say
did you have a mindless shame a
different or did you have a mindless
shame a completely different when says
that
that's when it was
because at the end of the day they're
both right we spoke out in the course of
the d that's one of the
is even a problem. It's that
if however
then even it's going to be a problem.
The reason it's not so that our Mishna
is not like because it's not so posit
because we got to figure out what is
what do you mean told you what a is yeah
problem is he told it to me a second
time and the second time told me he TOLD
ME SOMETHING COMPLETELY different he was
cer himself in an incredibly blatant way
and if that's the case we now need to
figure out what the realas is. The
reason it's a is because when we figure
out what the real is, we're going to see
it. It's not so that the is like now
what is the real
according to the real disruption is that
if you had a mindless
then it's going to be possible only it's
going to be according to the real
disruption is that it's only that's
and according to the real is that it's
only that it's going to be
either way based on what the real is
that's going to determine whether
there's
Let's see it inside.
So we said
according to who was the way we just
spoke it out
that the only time said is when you had
in mind
and I could always tell you
our Mish is talking about with the was
and being that it's over there
So the could be according to so really
late there's no that the lake
but according to who did not learn the
to the steer in the way
you'll tell me
what did Rabbi say rabb said that when
the say
so maybe you'll tell me the mishna is
not talking
You tell me the is talking about but the
says they can't be
the is talking about because the said
the clearly was talking about we spoke
out twice whether the also means but for
sure the talk about the case of the
Mishna was
maybe you'll tell me that the Mishna is
talking about a case where it was
not and therefore like you don't have to
say that the
meaning what did say
but that doesn't work in the because
again
the is clearly talking about
says
you have to say
you don't have to. That's why
of course it's like no it's not true
because at the end of the day it's only
going to be
it's not going to be
exhale just to end
with one
and that is
the Pik says in Seafia
and this is an peric megiml
So we know said about the third
and in one of his
said
the day is going to come with going to
bring on the
your
says that I'm going to
I'm going to be appeased. I'm going to
be satisfied with the carbon that the
kayan are going to bring. If you take a
look at the pish,
the goyan says on the words
one word.
So again said
says the
what it means is and at first glance
it's
why did the [ __ ] say
it sounds like we're talking about the
and the veric on those carbon thus make
the goyan when he said veris
I once heard from
who told me that he heard from
Shapiro he said based on another guy and
this guy is really repeated in two
different places it's in that's the ones
in the beginning of the fourth paras
and it's also in the first parak
so everybody knows that the garra says
inactis
that the three that he dabs every day
were instituted
was instituted
and was instituted
of the Shak and the
but the said that if to understand it on
a deeper level. Shak was instituted Ked
the first
of the
of the Shak and Ma was instituted
the last of the of the what was the
first of the that's easy it was what was
the last of the
so that's not as easy it was a carbon
So together with every single
the carbon whether it was a or had to
bring wine that was poured on the misbeh
was known as the it's one of the min
that we referenced in the introduction
to the d the first aid of the obviously
was the last was the came along with the
said Go that
was instituted
of the of the and was instituted
of the
hence
the
and is the
of the
shall bay says it's for that reason
is even referred to as why is it
referred to as
it should be referred to as I don't know
it's because it corresponds it's it's to
the component of the it's the last of
the which was the the explains it a
little bit deeper we're all familiar
with right What's so based on
and there's an idea to say
and then ultimately
as the sun is rising well not everybody
knows but it's aishing
is that just like there's an Indian
there's a
well right
is true not only
in the fourth par of said what's
He said is because was connected to it
was connected of the first carbon that
was brought every single day in the B
was always the
was brought first thing in the MORNING
IT WAS BROUGHT AND THAT'S why when we go
ahead and we
but the d is
of the
when did They finished the
carbon it was the last thing THAT WAS
DONE. SO IT WAS DONE AT THE LAST MINUTE
because afterwards he can't do anything
else. So it was done as the sun was
setting and therefore which is the last
part. It was the last part
of the therefore
it's also supposed to be as the sun is
setting. So the is also related to the
idea that is connected of the and is
related to the
and the said that's why the is called
because it's
and then the goes on and he says the
says everybody knows say
right if a person has to pick and choose
and decide which should I be the most
nizarin. Should it be shakras? Should it
be or should it be says the guy? You
want to know which you should be the
most nizarin? The you should be the most
nizarin is says to why what's he says?
I'm going to tell you why. Because is to
the carbon as we just said. That's why
it's called
and the carbon I quote is
it's the choicest of all the carbon
the says
and the says
that the only time that the refers as to
the in the entire asph fish is when it
comes to the carbon
the says right at the beginning of
the
literal of those words is the coin
should take the in and it should be but
the is
says what does it mean
When the was brought to all of a sudden
had this carb who's thinking he
remembers him there's this incredible
that has from this carbon that causes
the carbon
to be malic of the carbon and that's why
we refer to the ascaras and the guide
says you only find this by the carbon
min and if that's the case that is the
and it's the only carbon where you find
this of and
it's for that reason
you want to know the is when you
bringing a carbon that's and if aid had
the opportunity to bring a carbon ma the
ascarasa that he would get the that he
would be to through THAT CARBON WOULD BE
FIRE AND that's why said
because when you dive in you're bringing
a carbon and a carbon has in it that
and that's that
that's going
to be a day where
to go in one word what does it CC
it's the
where the said that the one carbon
that's where you find where you find of
right where you find
that's the
and the truth is I think if you read the
comes along with right the shall of the
is the
says the it's the component of the
which is exactly what is but the bottom
line is this guy is going the truth is
he told me if you think about it it
opens up so many different we say every
single day
right may the be sweet by why we
emphasizing The min because the min is
the sweetest of all the carbonas. The ma
is that one carbon that the refers to
ascarasa one other
this is in
very very famous line of
talks about that even after a person
does chuva doesn't necessarily mean that
his stat status by is back to where it
was before he did the a right you think
you're doing chuva okay I'm good to go
then says it's a mistake he says
Even about someone who did chuva, he
should
wipe out his as if they never happened
and want him and Hashem should be by him
and he should view him as if he never
did a I'm skipping a little bit says
because it's possible for a person to do
and Leo
and that he did will be gone and any
that was supposed to come to him because
he did will be gone
but might still not be interested in
having a relationship with him
and his will not be by him.
is associated with
these epic words said that it's possible
for a person to do and get right if a
person has a run with a friend okay with
somebody that he knows
but doesn't necessarily mean we're going
for drinks tomorrow it doesn't
necessarily mean we're going to have
dinner doesn't necessarily mean we want
to be friends that's saying a person
could do
How did the bring out this point that
this guy is so
which is always
which is something that makes a person
that's an Indian that's an Indian that
it could be this is not that's why
that should be but this guy is not
what's the saying he's saying that we
know says
What's the
is that it's related to the idea that
the was to the
and the
is the
that's something that you always find
with regards to the carbon. So if
I get the carbon so that means there's
no
that can get a person more
than and that's of
I just want to be Messiah with one punch
line and I think it's
what's the reason why
right what's the what's the simplest
reason the simplest reason is Because
happens in middle of the day and middle
of the day you're have a lot of things
going on and as a result it's very
difficult to stop your day smack in
middle and try to be and think about
hashem and and think about what you have
to d for and what you have to be
thankful for. It's a very difficult
thing to do and because it's physically
challenging it's not easy thing to do.
So it's for that reason you got
right I think that's the most push
reason in the world. Truth is if you
look at the
that we referenced very briefly earlier
why is it that
the uses the word a word that you don't
find used by any of the other
reason is says
who's the person that brings the it's an
right because if you have a you have an
why you bringing a so obviously you're
bringing a because you can't afford to
bring anything bigger says the carbon
when he brings a carbon I see it as if
not he's not bringing a carbon he's
bringing a nephesh for an Arman to bring
a carbon is a very difficult thing to do
for the Arman to give his little
is more difficult for the to go ahead
and give his big haka because he's
counting every penny every nickel every
dime it's very hard for him and when he
goes ahead and he brings a carbon,
albeit a measly little carbon, but his
nephesh is in that carbon because he
just gave away a piece of his soul cuz
now that he took a little bit of and a
little bit of she and he gave it to
Hashem. Well, you know what? That's a
little less a little less she for his
family. And because there's such an
incredible messes
literally in that carbon that he's
bringing, it's for that reason the
refers to the asphal.
I just want to say one this right we
always talk about there's so many in
right a countless amount of this idea
that when the brings his
it's not a random right what's the whole
time of when aid brought a carbon what
was he trying to do an animal no it's
not what it was it was like talks about
the whole idea of a carbon is that bring
this carbon and by you bringing this
carbon It's going to be as if you
brought yourself
means that in the
what a carbon is SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT
THE GETS HIM MORE THAN the regular
person does. It's not like a random you
do this says kilo you did that. No, IT'S
YOU'RE GETTING THE TOYAS AND THE TAS AND
THE punchline of what a carbon is
supposed to be more THAN THE OTHER GUY
BECAUSE THE OF A CARBON is you're
supposed to be and when the when the man
went and he brought his carbon it was
literally
the reason the is
the reason there's a carbon the reason
it's the reason it's aso the reason it's
carbon it's all related to the fact says
it says
which is the reason that
is
wants our
is the smallest check we write every day
is
with a
six and a half minutes you're done if
you dive it in the right place right
doesn't take very long it's the smallest
back. It's the
but at the same time at the same time it
comes with the most mysterious cuz if a
person could have a like a mench and for
those six and a half minutes he could
actually think about
in a way it's the it's the from all the
that he's ever going to because what
wants from us is not necessarily
what wants from us is an
And that's really what feel is all
about. The represents this inion of it's
hard. It's it's difficult. It's a
mysterious nephesh but I'm going to give
it to you. And for some people it could
be a a financial contribution that's
hard for them to give. And for somebody
else it could be it's in his and for
somebody else it could be it's in his
but the lesson of the it being the and
it being
it's related to the fact that it comes
with a tremendous amount of the said
I think it's the in the shot
the shot is
that's good for why
is the which is why there's a but either
way the again it's it's just it's just
we always say it's just a couple of
carbs right it's a very very of that you
should know these little carbs this
little bit of
had such so much more than all these big
when we
say
it's always is the carbon it's because
it comes from nephesh and at the end of
the day that's really what the wants
from us what he wants from us is the
nephesh
Manas.