Chulin 135

Today's D is and we are at the Mishna in the middle of the very last Mishna the very last of the 10th per says the Mishna the question that we might have all been wondering about what part of the animal is the so loosely translated thea is the forleg of the animal usually means an arm but animals don't have arms they have legs a bunch of them thea is considered the forleg of the animal stating that which part of the forleg is considered a big you have to give it to the ken so what part of the forleg Does one have to give to the guy says the Mishna it's from the joint in the arua in the leg of the animal until the calf of the yat. Now the calf of the yad in English is the shoulder blade of the animal. The perk of the arua we said means the joint of the leg. But we know from learning in a very long time that stop saying the joint of a leg is not enough because we know that there are several parts to the leg of the animal. Hence there's more than one joint. In fact, it was a whole suglier in the maka that talked about the three different components and the two joints that attach those three different components. So what [snorts] perk of the ara are we referring to? So Rashi says this is the aruva that's nimis which if you remember that's the bottom part that's the lowest part. The perk is the part that can attaches the lowest part of the leg and the part right above that. So if you're going to take the leg and you're going to divide it into trunches A, B, and C, it's what attaches B and C together. So it's from that area all the way up. It's a pretty big share all the way up to the shoulder blade of the animal. That's considered the okay. Additionally he says that Nazer this is also the in the so when Naza used to bring his carbon there was a special that he had to fulfill with the of it's known as has its own the definition of that is the same as the definition of this and finally you should know that this same area meaning on the hind legs Not the four legs is considered the shik as it relates to the which had to be given to the guy. So this permeates three. Number one number two and number three also the in the difference is as it relates to the as it relates to it's the fourleg and as it relates to the of the it's the hind leg but again three completely different they sound very intertwined but they're not. That's the first of the either way says the said I agree with the definition of I don't agree with their definition of shik rather shik you want to know what the shik is in the laws of that had to be given to the k of every carbon it's I agree with the lower boundary however It's goes to the area that's the of the reggo which again we're not farmers but it's lower than the it's lower than the shoulder bread hence according to the is going to be a smaller either way. So we now defined what is and by the way no as it relates to the is as it relates to the now we have to know what the is so loosely translated the is the jawbone but what does it mean specifically? So it's miner shell lei the jawbone at pico shel garggeras until the top part the opening of the trachea. We'll see a little bit more about that in the g either way. Which one of the three matono did the Mishna not define? It was the ka that was not defined. But you know the ka of course is something that we're quite familiar with from perfus if you don't know what the ka is by klamal it's time but either way on that note we had a pretty straightforward albe it technical mishna and the now is going to bring it aa that's going to define these a little bit more starting with says the when it says that you have to give it means you only have to give one of Which one? If it's one, how do you know it's the right? Maybe it's the left. It says maybe means the left. How do you know it means the right? It's based on something said this by the way says in the and explained that means which one it's the most and which is the most right. So to hear means I'm human. So the fact that it says but it says with that means the most like said in the bar and it's for that reason we know which do you give it's only the right one. It says that you're supposed to give the also the so what's that coming to explain now as it relates to the there's one. So it's not like there's the right and the left there's one. So it can't be it's coming to tell me the right jaw. Right? So what then is the hey coming to teach me? Says [snorts] the the wool that's on the head of the sheep or [snorts] the the beard right the here that's by the of the goat they're included in you have to give it to the go. So what's that coming to be? It's coming to be that on top of the cave additionally the milk that's inside the cave. So you have the and in one sentence. So right in one of the is to know when it's right it's boss of not of but it's not but in this we have both it's how do you know that [snorts] those things belong to the says it's based on something that the great said what did he say used to So when the would go to the and he would give him the would return it. So what do you see from here? You see that really belonged to them but they out of the goodness of their heart would tell the you know what I want to give you something in return. I don't want to take so much right. So they were interesting thing. There's an idea of being there's an idea to be as well. They wouldn't take 100%. I appreciate what you're giving me, but I don't want all of it. I'll [snorts] take only some of it. That's something that the and from the fact that they were with regards to the master belongs to them. So the gumar says that supports the making from the hay of either way. So the started with a that of as it relates to what we learn from there it's the it's not the so if somebody asks you which of it's the right one how do I know that it's from stating that the is going to bring two additional here's the second used to say now these Damuro are sometimes referred to as the dare rishum. They're the same thing. The way Rashi tes the dam is here and is these are the people that would mro that are very sometimes is used in the context of things that are above our pay grade. But either way that the reason the coin gets it corresponds to the hand of Pinas. So Pinas is one of the kayan with the idea and a lot of hilus kohuna actually developed because of pinas specifically his with zimri and kosby specifically the da kamurus used to say that if you want to trace the history you want to know the rest of the story of it's based on that episode it's based on the story that took place in par and the beginning of paras with pin How so? Because was he took the spear with his hand. He served. He was with his hand. So would the hand. That's where they would get this right. The reason they would get is because after the story there was a and stopped the with his because he used his jaw. He used this that's why the would get the and finally the reason they get the ka is because of the role that the ka played in the parish and for that you don't even need the so much it's literally the says by the way means the ca that's what it means it means her stomach so you see that the spear was pierced into her stomach her stomach played a role in the story of pinas and it's connected at again that the khan was to the ka. Okay. Okay. So, what does this have to do with another to says that it's because it's that when was he did it with his right hand and if that's the case that's connected would be that you have to give the co the right again there's no clear mash in the gor that the reason we're bringing the dam is to bring another macar to stating that Rashi speaks it out and Rashi knew it because it's a because it followed a and as we're about to see now it's also going to be followed by a so if we're throwing in the was sandwiching it in between these two I think it's posh that that must be what's going on either way it says the what's the third it says in the So this is referring to the of the of every single carbon which although was so right whoever wanted to eat it was able to eat it but at the same time the had to be given to the now in that par it says how do You know that the of the that's how do you know that too it was the right meaning the say how do you know that that's had to be the right one as well it's coming to be that's what we need how do you know that it's also to know the bottom line is because of the of the way the talks about other things where you could have thought it's the right or the left. It's supposed to be the right the right one. Bottom line is we have three. How you know that is either it's learned out from or said because the reason the geta is his right hand. So therefore it makes sense that the would be the right one or it's learned that from the par of the extra word is that there's another thing where again it should be the referring to the of the going back to the garggeras. So the Mishna said that the lei goes from the jawbone and it extends downward to the peak of the garggeras the pes of the garggeras says the [snorts] how could that be that [snorts] when you give the you don't just give him the jawbone but you even give him the which sounds like the extends further down into the trachea. goes all the way into the where the took place. The Maka is making in his question and that is the Pico is above the says the we have so is one of the five that govern the laws of what is state that within the there's an area where the has to take place. It's not enough that you do a and it's not enough that you and it's not enough that you get the right there. There's an area. So you have to make sure it's not too high, it's not too low the sign and within that world there was of what all these are specifically specifically said that in the event that you would do a meaning on under that's what specifically this means you would shack really really high so high you'd go to the area that's known as the is it would be kasha. But what's the point? The point is that according to antigenos that area that's the pico is actually part and parcel of the bash because antigen holds there's no on the right heels in that area you go all the way to the and it's still going to be kosher. So when the Mishna says with this price that says the reason is because it's going that's included in the so therefore you're right when you take the according to according to the you're right according and it's for that reason it's it's going to work says or you could say im or if you want you could say that when we say imma doesn't mean that it's going to be taken together with the give it to the but means that it stays with the behem but this is not something that you're going ahead and you're giving the am so without even coming up for breath the 11th per of so the 32nd introduction to is the is one of the specifically it's as we're going to see in the Mishna sheep it's the wool of the sheep you have to take the first shearing and you have to give it to the what's the mart to this it's a gaze now if you look at the beginning of juxtaposes which is true with the of a and what you see from there and this is sort of that is a true in fact it's one of the raes that the terra talks about with the terra says that when you get a sheer from take the first part of it and give it away cuz by you doing that you're going to know that you acknowledge and you realize that this is a gift from this is not you have of course you have the whole which is coming up soon you have the mitzvah of right this this is one of those races so the of the gaze of on that note is going to start like all the previous pro have started racial gates and it's but it's only like but it's not like says the sounds like one and the same right I mean the introduction was the same so are they really the same good question it's the mission's question says They're not the same. In fact, so number one is and it's right. It's all the kosher animals. Additionally, it doesn't matter how big or small or how many animals you do or don't have. Either way, there's a however voracious when it comes to a number one it's only sheep and by the way even though sometimes means female sheep that's not what it means over here means sheep it's only if there are many says the you ask how much is good question two sheep so sheep ing two sheep. Now you're having the conversation of how do I know that? Oh, so you see it the definition of no means much more than that means five right this is basillo being make and unless you have five there's no what the definition is now why would you need right what's even what's this is because when the terra talks about the mitzvah doesn't talk about that's usually the way we introduce a lot of these it says and understood that when you use the word so it means more than one so that could be one is one but means right it means more than one it means inherently now what's the definition of that there's a that seems seems to suggest two olive seems to suggest five somehow ends up being always somehow ends up always being and and hence you have the twoas but the bottom line is it's coming from the fact that the use the word that's the giveaway that over here it's going to be a little bit different moving along that as it relates to the five makes sense stating Even if you have five already, there's a certain shear of how much you would have to shear, right? In order to be what's that she? It's a it's one and a half mono. Not sure where to go with that pun, but it's one and a half of each one of these animals. So, if you have five animals and you are goes, just to keep this simple, one and a half of each one, right? at weight of the equivalent thereof to a manu press then is going to be so light that it's five animals but how much would you have to go ahead and bees it would be a manu press of each of there's no of manu but even if you go ahead and you go is a koshu that in of itself is going to be okay usually a koshu means anything stating that is going to talk about this the law says Okay. So now how much wool do you actually have to give the kayen? Right. We're moving along here. So we know means a number is two or five like let's keep the simple. So it's going to be five. How much do you have to bees in order to be press of each one of the five. Okay. Now I was press five. How much am I physically going and giving to the says? So it's the weight of five right where do you have a share of five where you're giving to a that's so it's interesting which is the equivalent thereof right different currencies to 10 slum in the you had to make sure that the entire was made up of white wool but there can't be any there can't be any the reason is because you have to give five slums weight of real pure unadulterated wool that saya has a little bit of weight. We're concerned not so much that it's dirty, more that it is going to really in a superficial way inflate the weight which is not something that we want. So therefore you have to make sure it's going to be last and the methodology to this of which is it's big enough to make a cotton. How do you know that the she would have to be big enough to make a bag of the says it has to be a sh that you would be able to go ahead and give. So again let's uh do a recap on the first part of the Mishna. First part of the Mishna discussed the basic basic of the laws of is not so has nothing to do with yes being a mikdash not being a mdash in fact it's something that's only by it's not by very similar to this which is not totally it's not totally mik and counterintuitively it's something that's only it's not something that's by kachchin. Additionally, the mission said that as it relates to the laws of it's only by sheep, it's only if you have multiple sheep uses the word means multiple sheep. What does multiple mean to two according to five another there's how much you would have to shear in order to according to it would have to be a mono of each one said which sounds like there's no share at all but we'll see in the really is a how much of this do you have to go ahead and give the so that already there was no it's the equivalent of five That's the bench here. But I know you do, right? The Tyra says what you're supposed to do. Over here it says and means it has to be a and a mount of wool that you would need to make a bag. That would be considered a a that would be the now the Mishna from here until the end is going to give us a couple of pisum as it relates to what would be if before this person went and it was racial case of giving to the and he went ahead and he was he went ahead and he died it is doesn't have to give it the reason he doesn't have to give it is because he's at this point you're going to be 101 never what if he whitened it but He wasn't because that's not considered another if somebody goes and he buys the sheared wool of a is he has no obligation to give and by the way this is true if he bought it after the already shared it or even if he bought it while it was on top of the animal but if he doesn't own the underlying animal it belongs to and You go ahead and you now do the gaza is you're going to be what if you bought not from but you bought from your friend you bought from a ruin bought it from she so is like this she in the event that there's a little bit this is the third shear that we have in this uh pun so in the event that we were sheer a shear of right shearing so if there's a little bit left over meaning the s but he didn't sell everything he was mish for himself a little bit is going to be the one that's obligated in the is the one that's going to be what would be in the event that this who sold had two different types of he had he had that were which they're not black and they're not white okay and he went ahead and he sold them theu but he didn't sell them the he He sold him one of them or he saves in that situation each person is going to have his own obligation to give. This is all something that the Gar is going to explain. Either way the now very similar to the way started is going to focus on the first what's the first and the is that it's only it's not and similar to perka the is going to bring a mart to it and then discuss Why do I need a mar for it? So a similar comparable comparable signal says why is it that the laws of but not says the learn from a which it says means right as opposed to if the belongs to is going to be excluded. And that's how I know again it's a little counterintuitive because by you're giving so much to the so you would think that where you're giving certainly you should have to give by true but the says and teaches me not says the only reason is because it says but if I wouldn't have a I would have thought I guess Right. A few caches. Number one, not let us shear the wool of the by the way is in the parish of that's why this features very prominently but it says and it's not just it's all you're not allowed to go and shear the wool of kachum. So I need a pk to tell me that you don't give the raous. There is no giza. It's not something you're allowed to do. Why do I need a pk? So the if the Mishna was talking about I would agree with you 100% you want to know what the mission is talking about there is no and because there's no that's why the tell me it's going to be excluded by how could you say that just like so too is also by the way we're talking about Giza not always come together and rebel said that as it relates to what we need the Giza part it's and it's as well and for the it's true said that but when he said it he didn't mean that it's he meant it's only now being that it's only and therefore I need apost to the laws So once you go ahead and did the Giza you should have to go ahead and give I mean the understanding that if there was no oft even if you're allowed to go ahead and do but if said not and they would tell you don't do the Giza and don't go ahead and and give it to the right but at the same time if you went ahead and you did do the Giza like that's what the Gar is like a little wordier than it really had to be. But the bottom line is this. The bottom line is as the true rabb said stating that it's only being that it's only I'll tell you that the Mishna is talking about and that's why I need a because there is no when it comes to again the is what do I need the terrorist say is only true is not true but the have another Good. You could do Giza, but the wool belongs to what do you mean giving it to the What's the going to get from it? It belongs to you don't own it. He doesn't own it. The whole thing doesn't make any sense. It's one big charade because being that it's so at the end of the day, what's going to end up happening to it? It's going to end up going anyway. You can't be mil back. You're not let to use it on your own. K's also not let to be mil back. So it's posh that if the wool has kaduca so it doesn't make sense that the meaning you addressed how you're allowed to do the physical act of giza but the wool right now is kadesh so it doesn't make sense to go and give it to the I hear but there's a workaround you could always be right so I'll go ahead and I'll be and then I'll take the wool and give it to the cen and the money is going to my I'll have to go to better I'll have to give them the money but you want to know why I would need a typically it's anyways it's true it's anyways but there's a workaround I could always be but it's not true you can't be ped because is that in order to be paid you have to do what's called you have to in a very err way appear in front of some uh independent objective governing body and they have to evaluate and figure out how much this thing is earth, you can just go ahead and be ped on your own because maybe you're going to be ripping off hackish. So there's a a concept of right that's something that you have to do. Okay? So being that you're going to go ahead and you're going to share it, you're not going to have the ability to once you share it do because literally means has to stand. That's what part of means and you can't do that with wool. So like this that's good that holds that when it comes to there's no okay so you have you don't have to worry about this but according to that says that is included what's the over here so if you hit the pause button for one second the has an but it only works if you take one position which is uh debated in shas and that is the Mishna said The question is why do I need a what's the mart a says we learn from there as opposed to the cash is what do we need a pos for I can't do giza it belongs to heish anyways what am I giving to the right this whole thing doesn't make any sense so no no very simple right there's a way to make this work it's the where there is nois And although the wool itself is going to be I could always be I isn't there. You can't do that with wool cuz wool can't physically stand just it can't do that. Yeah. But there's that holds that doesn't require. So if you take the position that doesn't require you're good to go. There's no it's very simple. The problem is there's that holds that even requires a mother. If that's the case, you address the isiz by telling me you're talking about but the problem is it's still hectic. So what are you giving the k and don't tell me you're going to be? Because in order to be po you need and there's no way to do on the sheared wool of an animal says the [snorts] answer the question to come up with another mahal that's going to work that holds that requires a mother name could be this said that we need a to be from is talking talking about a case where a person went ahead. He was and he did it. He was but he wasn't. Okay. I would have thought that I would have thought that you should go ahead now and you should be right. Go now and do the Giza and give it to him. Why? Because the wall is anyways not hectish. So if the wall's not hectish, it shouldn't be a problem. And by the way, if the wall's not hectish, I don't need pigon. If the wall's not hectish, I don't need simple. The animal was hectish, but the wool wasn't hectish. So I would have thought you should go ahead and do it on my brother said that's why I need that the underlying animal is hectic. It's for that reason it's excluded. But the ask so if that's the case so why do you have to be that we're talking about let him be talking about now truth is maybe he is talking about but that's not where said he said right so the is just a if you're going down the road and you're telling me that it's so why does it have to be talking about let it be talking Because what's the issue of it's only because the animal is kadesh and the wool is also now go ahead and shear the wool off this animal but to the extent that it was said so why do you have to be said let it be true for as well says there's another reason because when you share the wool of an animal it weakens the animal and being that the underlying animal is there's an is to weaken an animal of the says that's against so that should be wait you're allowed to weaken like devalue but not soar says talking about this person said it was so you already said he carved it out in his initial hish this is something apparently you could do where you could say that any that's going to come later says okay so we're going in circles the only way works is well if that's the case why does it have to be the only reason you would need to be by is is because otherwise it's going to be it's going to be but if it's there's no problem by doing the Giza anyways is a very if If a person is maktish the is not going to be kadesh. If a person's even though you the is going to be and it's based on so what does mean so means hectish spreads that's what it means it means it spreads what's the right picking this up in middle of a conversation if somebody says I want the foot of an animal to be anah it's considered anah what do you see from here that And then it spreads throughout the animal. And by the way says he if somebody says it's not like a foot that's not over there he's that it's going to be. So if someone's the spreads so here's the point. If somebody would be of the ger and of the once it's on the animal so that hectish is going to spread because the whole animal includes obviously the entire animal is going to end up being that's only true it's not true that's why only worked when not when it's not and this really is the second mahalak in the gar again the question is why do I need a positive from the whole thing doesn't make sense so one was it's talking about so there's no way and even though the gaze itself is going to be kadesh I could always be ped I don't need a going to it's like doesn't require a mother yeah but what about hold does require for that you need another so you can't say pig that's not going to work you have to say it's talking about where it was you have to say it's talking Yeah. Well, you were Makdish the animal, but you were a mish you were a mish the giza. If you're going with that mahal, you have to add in the you also said because if you didn't also say even if the gaze itself is notes but it would be an isiza because by doing that you're being the animal and you're not let just like you not let it be. Now why is this tally in rightes was very clear that this second in the is also by it would be a there's no such thing because once you is automatically going to be ra came and ra said uh a third he said you want to know maybe why you need a p it's talking about not where you an animal cuz then you run into problems the animal the fine print but rather it's talking about it's talking about were you only the giza so you weren't mish the animal the only thing you were mish was the giza so you were mish the wool of the animal okay says uh ra and let me explain to Why in that situation if you went ahead and you shear this animal why you would need a I would have thought go ahead and do a and then be the and give it to the says and we learn from there that the only time is if you could do the immediately after the If however you would have to do a gaza and then a pad and then an at that point it would be excluded and it's that pik and for that reason that reach is not mash. So ra has to be unpacked a little bit a couple of things. So r is akima first is talking about the maktish giza atma. You weren't mish underlying animal you only makish the giza. If the akint is that you only makish the the giza. So the original kasha of [snorts] isn't there in an of s that goes by the wayside because the animal itself is not kadesh that's where the animal is kadesh and now let it go ahead and be is that animal over here the animal was never kadesh that kasha doesn't even start what was kadesh over here what's the mktashim right we're discussing mutashim so what is the mktashim it's the it's the giza itself okay so why do I need a pik what am I going to do with giza that's cottish right belongs to the hect Anyways, no. What I would have thought is you should go ahead and you should be now up until this point wasn't so possive here. He's he's addressing because the only time is by an animal. So if you have an animal there's a now if you have an animal that's and then you go ahead and you shear the wool even though now it's wool but it's grandfathered in. It was once part of an animal so it's included in the laws of our mother. However, if the hectish started with Giza alone, so then it was never. So in this situation, if you wanted to go ahead and be paid, it'd be posed to be paid. So we're not getting involved in anything. There's no Giza and the fact that the hect the Giza itself belongs to hect just go ahead and be ped and has nothing to do with the of needing and not meeting. In this case, it's for sure going to be good. There's just one problem with this and that's why the punchline if you notice in the gumar is very different than what we discussed until now when we started the so the gumar said how do you know what's the you don't have so we said it's different from the ves if you look at it's a different it's right now it's the same right but it's a different what's the What's the point? If we're talking about what the underlying animal is, be it the whole animal or be it from the Giza. So says your sheep as opposed to sheep that belongs to but once Rob is going ahead and he's making an so it's not it is your sheep. It is so you can't be anything from now. You need a different type of mat. you need that the Mia would have to be maybe if the wool belong I don't have that meat the only meat I have is so has to creatively rework what the is not but it's already is gaze [snorts] you have to go from the straight to the but if the wool itself is hackish it would require a pigon that's a in between step and Right. What do you have a similar to this? So if somebody writes a character it's possible because it has to be right such a concept. But the bottom line is this is that it's based on that it's going to be excluded. But the bottom line is Ra said you want to know why you need a Pik I'll give you a reason maybe why you would need a Pik and what emerges from the way Ra works the Drush is the punch line of D is different. It's not but rather it's or gays. There can't be anything between the gays and if you're going to require opinion that's going to be a problem. Bottom line is this concludes this portion of the d which if you do theikum three right not the easiest but three mus of why you would need a a to tell me that is not right the k is ra is not you can't do giza the wool belongs to heish. Like why are we even having this conversation? The mas there's three that you can take. The first d is it's an animal that's based on the fact that it's noisa. You're going to shear the wool which is something that you're allowed to do. Now to give the wool has no what you're first going to do is you're gonna be and we're going that even though this was once part of an animal and there's a of needing in order to do but that holds doesn't require doesn't require this is this is not going to be an issue. So again if you hold that doesn't require almost felt like this was going to be pretty straightforward. this was going to be very easy promises the mother that holds mother. So in this scenario to go and she did is is really not going to work. So the gave a second mahal the second was we're again we're dealing with but you so the wool itself is is notes. If it's not, you don't have to be you don't have these problems cuz it was never said two things. Number one, this also only works by because even if you were and even mayor is going to be that there's going to be a additionally you would have to say because if you didn't say there would be a secondary reason why you wouldn't be able to do the Giza because inevitably you're going to go ahead and you're going to be mish. The third mahalak is it's talking about fake you were mish only the giza you are mish underlying animal or you were mish was the giza if you only makdish the giza so then for sure you can be and there's no issue of hence it's why you would think that there's a mitzvah but the kamash is not not because it says not not because it says gay have anything in between So the it's three akintas. The first akinta is just good old fashioned nothing else period. You can make it work. The second is where it's the animal. The third mahalak is just the opposite. You are the animal says the we're just going to tie up some loose ends now and that's going to be the end of the d. Number one understood that the oft was not the word but it was can't have anything between the Giza and between the soar says according to what do I do with the word right what is teach me it's not coming to so what is it coming to the says it's coming to teach me that was expressed in a belongs against say as opposed to belong by it's true but only with other is if however the then it's not going to bottom line is of what I do with right pick your you like you like but other only but at the end of the day you want to know what does with this that's what he does with it now the is going to digress a little bit from its digression so we just mentioned this price so we know exactly why we mentioned this B so no suspense here right they address another of not but now what is this in this so according to according to the when it says in It's coming to mind but only according to when it says it's coming to now the holds in that if I just have one of it would be because that's if I had two then one would be the other which means that I hear the abundant better makes sense. There's one m so fast. So well because I mean Rabi so well cuz Rabi is taking one me and he's being not unless unless he's going to tell me that has another somewhere in to be and if that's the case this is already a second makes sense and that is really the approach of the like that's the of the obvious to the had some because otherwise he would f like so want to know what is that says he learns it from the of the what's the ratio of the so we mentioned it all the way in the beginning of the paric so the beginning of talking about the end of the talking about now from that sounds a lot like right the exact. So we learn from there. Okay. And what I know let's get the byum. It's an easy hackish say for the or else we'll see in the gumar. It's really not. It's the whole end of the but um at this point sounds like an easy hackish. So we're going to be makishum. So I already have a I have one from the heckish of truma. So when it says this is already a second what's come even says you're saying good I hear you because there's only one but it's not true to me what about at the beginning of the races they hold there is no and the reason is because the wrote the wordious in middle so as much as at first guys say this is like the best heckish ever right this is such an easy heckish it's True. Because if the wanted to really equate and compare then you would have said it's so easy. So you're right. On the one hand it's one. It it screams oneish. But then again why did say a different sounds like it's not mish one and the same. So the ration is a mafik. So therefore I can't be makish anything. I only have one minute. I want me. It's gonna be five. What's going to do? I hear the it says the second time, but it says vious. And the is always right. Saying good. You know what? In this situation, I'm not buying the and the reason is because really if if the two are meant to be the same, it would have just said one races. The minute there's another races, it's not the same thing. EITHER A V. YEAH, WE'LL WE'LL address that another day. But for right now, I'm not hearing a hackish likes the hackish because he sees avoid and therefore therefore we wanted to have we brought him back together. So the fact that there's an extra doesn't make this then on arrival because the extra is is coming to be between this they're not one and the same at the end of the day to me the didn't agree with that but what's the bottom line what's the beer and the is between and according to let it only I already have the heckish between Truman and the ra and the the I isn't there in between but the is the abundant that no the isol there's no heckish to be had all I have then is one of it's not going to be the in line of the of today's a second and by the way we'll see a third shad in a moment as well another you could explain the and specifically now we're turning our attention from focusing more to focusing on right the saying good you have one so you have one answered himself he says I have a hish from someone said okay and said I'm not buying the hish because it says I gave a nice so the same now is not we know holds there was makes a lot of s not a hish the same the are fetching out that it's not a hesish because ra even though there's a thear doesn't love and it's for that reason the gumar is offering ing an alternative explanation in the Raanita that there's only one despite the fact I think there's two now so right another of why the Naz from the what's the punchline of Rabi I Oh, because in other words is that if field has a he's going to be like he'll be potter. So I know that if it's true there is true as well. So I know if you have a non-Jewish partner have a Jewish partner but the disagree with that whole premise that when it comes to if you have a non-Jewish partner you're actually going to be and you know what everything that grows has of why? What belongs to the it is what belongs to the not is not. So you have a very he says the that belongs to the Israel meaning whatever the Israel is going to get when they do their distribution of this field is going to say whatever is going to go to is going to be now says what's the over this is a classicer case if you holder so when the and the divide the was the older there's no way to make some sort of glory whose was what so but what we are learning is that you see from here clearly that the fact that there's a partner is neither here nor there that doesn't exempt anything so it says what you want it's not that they don't hold it a hish they graish they really do hold it a hesish nas [snorts] they hold doesn't do anything for me so at the end of the day I only have one myth the only is by so if that's the case one has two and has one says a third mahal and in the third mahal the way Rashi explains it is it's just the opposite of the second mahal and the third mahal could mean nobody holds it heish the suggesting now that maybe you know maybe the were right after all even though we made a big deal about and the second it sounds like the is mching the doesn't like the way the rabbon got out of it maybe the were right for getting out of the hes and maybe even Rabi would be right or should not be right for holding of the hes. So if that's the case, if that's the case, the original and what was the original right? So how could it be that from one says could be could be holds that from one and says very very rational point. What's the whole point of why we all agree it can be my because it says it has to be 100% yours. Okay means one person owns it. It doesn't mean two people own it. says okay so what doesn't mean one person is opposed to two people means it doesn't matter how many people as long as those people are all but what it's not about that's what is the bottom line is we have a with regards to if owns with a partner what's as it relates to if the partner is in anybody holds that there is no and the reason is because it says and from there I know for sure as opposed to if there's a and the Garra said that who had a whole different formulation of the is going to very much uh go with this price but the bottom line is everybody holds that if you have a you're going to be from I guess right himself is going to be from I The question is what if you have a and hold yes you're going to be holds no you are going to be what is the so the had a few in terms of what the what the was and really if you you you narrow it down it's really two primary one mahal is that has another to be if he has another so I have two one is the other one is so what is that other it's the heckish of the beginning of the which talks about Truma and the end of the which talks about the assumption is that uh yid who has a non-Jewish partner they only feel together even the yid is going to be from well if that's the case so it should be true for as Well, if it's true for I don't need now another to tell me that if you have a non-Jewish partner you from that other is going to tell me if you have a if you have a Jewish partner the don't have that other Joshua why would have the two would have that either because they don't know the or they disagree with the the problem with they just hold it's not true if aid and a non-Jew want to feel together the is going to be father and son they both held that way so if they both held that way so there is such And that would be the the other mahal is that had nothing to do with it had nothing to do with the laws of no that's not the we're learning the I guess what then is the it says mean to be only coming to someone that's not a which is of exhale. So just to end today's uh daff and really to end with one final as it relates to as relates to rash and that is inash this is in says as follows. There's a mitzvah to eat, to drink, and to be on and on. meeting. You would have thought that maybe one can fast on says but you shouldn't because if you're going to eat too much it's going to take away a little bit from the but says the there's a mitzvah to eat there's a mitzvah to drink and there's even a mitzvah to be as it relates to be the init the well-known in the first parakash that's quoted by the tour earlier in so this is this is 16 early right in the beginning ofash and the end of says the ministral is to bathe and to take a haircut before Russ and the reason we do this is it's based on a which is that said right who's a nation like that has such a unique relationship with both explain what do we mean when we say find me another nation like that understands the ways of their god [snorts] If somebody has to stand in front of a judge because he doesn't know how his tin is going to play itself out, but you did not like that. And they eat and they drink and because they know that everything is going to work out fine is going to perform miracles for them. that when they're standing on giving, it's going to be for that reason says the is to take a haircut and to bathe and to give gifts and this is a cha it's on all those people that think that the right thing to do is to fastash. So says the vilian you want to trace this 100 or so years earlier take a look at this Torah the Torah itself traces itself back to a medishi that talks about how the yidden even though on rash there's a even though on rash they're going and they're giving but at the same time at the same time they do it with [snorts] a certain confidence they do it they they put on their finest clothing and they bathe and smell good and they look good and they come in looking as handsome as they can possibly look and the reason is because they know they know that ultimately at the end of the day is going to perform miracles for them. The truth is if you think about this which is brought down and again is how you supposed to prepare for rash. You're supposed to come and looking your finest and also how you're supposed to conduct yourself on right that's the way you're supposed to do it. If you think about it, it really is a tremendous. The reason it's tremendous is because the soash is the doesn't make sense. I hear that's the whole point of the despite the fact that it's the is what you're supposed to do. The problem is we do find that the is I mean open up any muser any you pick the muser whether it's the from it's the from the from the open up all the mus they all talk about the how the the fish were already tracing for a month from the time that we went ahead and we benched right from that point already there's an there's a there's a and NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN ON where it's NOW IT'S GAME TIME RIGHT NOW THAT it's happening by saying we don't say on how in the world could you go ahead and sing that's not a time to go ahead and recite the so it's a little pier now again there's a supposed to be supposed to You got to find that balance I suppose but I think it's just practically speaking what's the you know is but there's an idea that's expressed by the they all say it in in different but the mahalak goes something like this if you take a look at that beer agra that we just mentioned it's the first beer agra it's cotton alf and sim tough after he quotes the Torah the that's quoted by the Torah as the to this idea of he said there's another and this is even earlier than the and that is a it's a ina it's it's and it's over says that had gathered the together Ezra Hassifer and it was a very very trying emotional time for the Jews. The context of course we know is it's the beginning of Aayasheni and the Yidden spiritually were not in a good place. They were married to non-Jews. They weren't keeping the most basic kashras shabas. That's why we know a lot of takas were instituted at that time. MT was instituted by because of the fact that the Jews were so lax when it comes to Shabas the we always speak out that he says all but the says it means of the abundance came around at that time because they needed our and they needed ways of making sure that they're not going to be over all these dices that the yidden were being but either way the yen come together and it's the success and rashi says what was this rash it was rash And the yidden are crying and and their mish they they they can't come to themselves. They're they're literally at the point of of mourning. And the reason is because they just got a mush from the Ezra. You can imagine what that sounded like and it's the rash and it's the and they have a pintid and they understand that that they have to stand in front of their creator, in front of their maker. And this is uh this is the the worst of times for them. And they're in a very very bad spot. So and Ezra and all the that are there, they talk to them and they stop them and they tell him as follows. I know today's a holy day. I know it's don't mourn and don't cry. Why did Ezra and have to say this? Because when they were listening to the they were they were they were mourning. They were literally tells them I want you to go home. Eat the best foods that you have and you should drink the best wines that you have and you should go ahead and find maybe there's someone that you know that doesn't have any food. someone who's meaning she says he didn't prepare any food. If you have an you know about go ahead and feed him because today is not a day to mourn. Today's a very very holy day and don't be you know why says the GUY THAT I'LL TELL YOU another is supposed to be the same because at that time the time the beginning of when is trying to be and they're in a state of they were in a bad place. What did he say? He told him, "No, this is not the way you're supposed to conduct himself on Russ. Don't be today is a very very holy day. It says in addition to the it's that this is what is supposed to be." But what does the end of that mean? What does that even mean? If you take a look at the Malbum, the Malum says as follows. The Malum says, "I know why you're crying. I know why you're mourning. You're crying and you're mourning because you know it's the and you know that you didn't behave this year and as a result, you're very worried about this. You're not confident and you're right for not being confident because you you DIDN'T BEHAVE. GUILTY IS CHARGED. It's not good. But I want to tell you something says the you told the I want you to go man. I want you to be bimha and not bima be in a frivolous state of euphoria but what you should do is you should be bim you should be in a state of you should be that in as much as you're giving but recognize who you're giving in front of you're giving in front of a and if you're going to do that then you're going to be bes if you're going to then you're going to have strength. You're going to have the that you need because that you're going to have that that you're going to have that is GOING TO BE YOUR THAT'S THE LAWYER that you need to represent you. You're you're wondering how am I going to stand? I I'm we're we're in trouble. We're crying. We're mourning. Go home and beh YOU KNOW WHY? NOT BECAUSE IT'S going to work out for some other reason. THE SIM ITSELF is that is your strength. That's how you're going to creep out of it. YOU WANT AN SAID IN the you had the worst year of your life. You want an how to creep out of this blad. Then this is the is recognize and appreciate that if you can go into this day with a confidence knowing that you're standing in front of your loving father. Well, that itself is going to give you the strength. That's how you're going to get out of this mess. SO, IT'S NOT BE HAPPY BECAUSE I HAVE INSIGHT. NO, BE HAPPY BECAUSE IF YOU'RE GOING TO BE happy that is that's what it means and if you look in this they all express the same and that is a person stands in front of his maker. That is true. It's true. But at the same time his maker is his father. He's a father that loves him more than a father can love his biological child. And it doesn't even matter who he is because So on the one hand there's an avoid of being because he knows that it's a and so he understands of course this feeling of it's a and his year is going to be set into motion on this day. But at the same time at the same time he also recognizes that who's the judge that he's standing in front of? The judge is his father. his father who he knows has his best interest in mind. So you're right and the fact that it's a that's but at the same time there's also an element of because who's the on that the on the is his father and if the is his father how bad could it be because he knows that he doesn't have to bribe this judge he's good he wakes up in the morning sh get bribed he's in a very very good place because he knows who this is and this sha is his father I saw in the from and this is in the it's so he brings from the brisk said that in one of the that we say in Russ was written by gab the p is called and in the we say as follows right if my a is so heavy it's so big that I can't even carry If you're going to kill me, you're the person I'm going to hope towards. And if you're going to decide, I want you to pay up for all that various that you did. I'm going to run away from you to you. So said, is there anger oxymoron in the world? I'm going to run away from you. I'm going TO I'M SO SCARED OF YOU. BUT BUT BUT WHERE YOU RUNNING? I'm going to run to you. And said that is the emotion on the supposed to feel I'm running away because I'm so scared. It's the you're giving them but at the same time he has to temper that with where am I running? I'm running to you. I'm running to you because there's no one else that could help me. And I'm running to you because I know you have my back and I know at the end of the day you're going to be there for me. And this is the in this piece by the way that it's the and through you want to get out of this situation that everything is uh going to be okay. You know is for 365 days a year. But how much more so is a rash? Because really this whole idea of of and this whole idea of through having trusting inh having the confidence in being willing to let go and not overad your life and not try to micromanage and control every single element and understand that there's a neighborhood that has your best interest in mind. Right? Hashem says you you want to control your life, control your life. But if you want your life to be in my hands, I'm here for you. I'm willing to do it. Right? That's the secret. And that secret that is so much more prevalent on rash CUZ WHEN IT GOES DOWN. SO WHEN more is it important for rash I think is for us to somehow come up with our best Michael Safy impersonation. It helps if you actually believe it and mean it. And that's the real aid. But la that's the avoid. The is is to go in and we should have his voice ringing in our ears. But really that that talks about throughout the hill and all the talk about because that's really the on the one hand but at the same time say I trust I I've been talking that this year is going to is going to play itself out better and whatever Yeshua whatever I need you need the other person needs it's I I I have been talking that this year it's going to this is all going to be in the it's going to be in the safer of Yeshua of Raf of Parnos of Alra. That is the secret that's the is the and this says the go it's not just the it's not just the it's not just the biblical advice that gave the a broken people they were mourning and they were crying on they they couldn't come to themselves what are you going to do today were dead the the charges they were facing were not but at the same time And that's the again should be to be able to balance these these two but at the same time right this of daily will lead to not daily but yearly an annual year a year a year >> [laughter] >> and a year of Saw the mayor be amazing.