Chulin 133

Today's d is and we are 23 lines from the bottom of so the topic of the d is the specifically the and the says one if a member of the is going to an animal specifically the he shall give to the the forleg of the animal the jaw of the animal and the abism the ka of the animal we saw in the that we already learned that used the word may to describe who it is is in the ka we learned from there that a koen himself does not have an obl obligation to be mafish and give it to another. Why? Because a is not called. What about uh Ley? So ra the says that Rav said that being that we're not sure if the or wouldn't be obligated to give either stating that the said on the top of top of the that although is not obligated to give however that's only if he shacks an animal for his own personal private produce. So they're shing an animal so they should have dinner. If however a cyen is a butcher professionally he has a commercial outfit where he animals and sells the animals then even the would have an obligation to be mafish on that is not said that is going to be the butchers They they've already been in for 22 years. Why? Because they violated this meaning they're professional butchers. They're not mafish. And said that any butcher that is not maf should be in. So rab reported that there are butchers in that have already been in for 22 years. says to what's the significance of what was saying he was just reporting a story it's not that way that that's not should be in that was it sounds like he's coming to tell us something informative other than just # rest of the story says maybe what he was saying was that they were in for 22 years but not more than 22 years as if there's an expiration date on said that he says it's going to be you know how long 22 years and that's what he said were in for 22 years but not more than that but the says it can't be when is there a limit to how much punishment we will impose on someone that does something wrong that's when it comes to if someone's not all but most he gets malus how much malus 39 not more. It says in the that if the gives one more than the 39 malus that he's supposed to give, he himself is going to get malus. So there there's a limit when it comes to so for example goes over to someone and he tells them you know he say has a right to get someone to do a mitzvah. He can they can physically hurt him. They can even kill him. How could you tell me there's a limit to how long you could put someone in for violating the mitzvah of the limit of 22 years. We know that when it comes to say there is no limit. If then certainly you should be able to put him in for more than 22 years. Again, what was the significance of what Rabb was reporting when he said that in they were in for 22 years? What he meant to say was that once they're in for 22 years, at that point, Bezdon has a right to ratchet it up. They could start penalizing the butchers monetarily and they could do it without prior warning. So Bezdon has a right to penalize Hefkar Bzdon Hefka. There's different that Bezdon has where they're able to go and even take things away from people. They can impound assets from people stating that there would be uh need to give the people prior wording to the extent that the butchers were in already for 22 years at that point they can go ahead and take away from them without actually warning them. once penalized butchers. He took away the thigh of the animal from them. He would take away literally the shirt off their back. Either way or a person who's giving he has to give to one co you can't take divided into two give half to one coin half to another coin. The entire goes to one coin. The jaw however they used to divide bone by bone. So you see you could divide even so that was talking about a much larger animal talking about a is a big animal has big bones biga. So that you could divide but a small animal they're not. It's also to eat from an animal. We are the owner of the animal was not anyone that eats from an animal without being it's as if you ate. So everybody's familiar with the laws of you can't eat or that has a without first being. If somebody does he's so it's very very thera viewed eating food that requires without being extremely stringently said and the same is true with regards to a we have to be stating that that's has to be eaten roasted. It has to be eaten together with mustard. The says we learn from there. This is a Pik that of course we saw many times when we learned we're still learning but the says in par so most of the talk about are mentioned in parishes and Hashem tells says I'm giving you And it used to eat their meat roasted. They used to eat it together with mustard. So mustard and roasted is the point is you have to eat it. It has to be eaten. And the of this is that even despite the fact that it's despite the fact that it's doesn't have it's to the degree that the laws of are going to apply. any that's not familiar with the laws of how you have to treat you're not let to give him the reason is very simple we just mentioned the that has to be eaten so if you're going to give to a that's not familiar with this of he's gonna end up not eating the mashk so he's not going to eat the matonis in the proper way said it's incumbent upon the upon the is that has the maton to do a little bit of a background search on the that he's giving the mat to to make sure he's qualified. Meaning, don't just check the to make sure that he's a you actually have to determine whether he's a buck. If he is, you can give it to him. If not, but the says this is also not true. price. We know this price any coin that's not in the has no. So what does it mean? We're talking about who says that it's all not the one that commanded these. Yeah. Commanded but not. So come from so that's a that's not such a that only avoid he's a such a he gets the but a that doesn't do those avoidas why this is shim's commentary because he's not ming because he thinks that was such a you can't give them continued. He said that this describes a was talking about a specific which also known as two types of and but the point is I would know only know the other had a list of the 15 other as mentioned many times in additionally's list is a very liberal list because has for example you don't usually think of as being brings that that's doesn't because it's possible to do the like the says in the beginning of the second par of and so can't do the so brings that is not supposed to point how do you know that a that's not in any one of those other 15 not only the oro of How do you know a coin that's not and any one of these avoid as well can't do the I can't get the and we learn from there what's the bottom line you see from then when do we say that a can't get that's not that is real he doesn't think he's serving but to the extent that he thinks the is It would seem clear from the gum that even if he's not a Bucky in the still would be we would give him the if that's the case says the said that [snorts] that's not Bucky in the you don't give him it's not true is not like you know I know that from this price of said that's not you can't give not being is a much higher or lower than not being familiar with. So it sounds like for only if the is not avoid is there such but to the extent that he's just a matter of him not being familiar with then you would be able to give him the veins that are inside the jaw of the animal are to eat. The reason is because there's blood inside you to eat blood of an animal. Any that doesn't know how to remove the blood or he's not familiar with the iser dam in the vein inside the jaw mata you're not allowed to give him the mat because he's going to end up eating the blood and that's a problem says it's not something you need to be concerned with why because at the end of the day the client's not going to eat the jaw raw he's going to do something with it if he roasts it made of dy the blood's going to come out if he cooks it and eat if he's going to cut it before he cooks it then he salts it made of diabet it's also going to come out what are you worried about you're worried that maybe he's not going to do malik right essentially the concern is that he may not do malik why would you be concerned that he's not going to do malik in other words the garra said that aba heard from who heard from you they have to be very careful when you give the to you just have to make sure that he knows to remove the vein says the garra what what's so special about that vein this blood okay meat has d inside And every Jew knows that you can't just eat meat. You have to cash it first. And the way you cash it is is by removing the blood. You have to remove the You have to remove of an animal. You have to remove the blood as well. Unless there's something unique about this particular dam says the Gmorra, I don't see why there should be a problem. And the Gmorra systematically proved that there's nothing unique about the dam that's inside this vein because if you roast it, it's going to come out. If you salt it, it's going to come out. So the only would be that maybe the is such an that he's not even familiar with the laws of that's not something you have to worry about once tested us. He said as follows a that goes and he grabs. So he's very anxious. He very much would like to be the one that's going to get these maton. So he cops it. Where does he from? So Rashi says the same thing that he spoke at earlier in the paric. He grabs the candy out of the hands of the children. So men would send their kids to the cayen to go bring the the matuna that would go and they would literally take it out of their heads. They didn't want it to go to wherever the father of these children had intended to sign it to. They wanted it for themselves. So apparently this must have happened and it must have been somewhat commonplace to the point that Ravo was one sitting with his talid rava right was rais. But either way so once asked this question is it a good thing or is it not a good thing? Meaning I can make two arguments. I can argue that he's showing his for the mitzvah and again it's also a it's a maybe it's not a nice thing. This is the way you you do a mitzvah do you should do it in a in a very nice way from the following. It says it says with regards to this mitzvah that the is supposed to give it to who he wants to give it to but it's also a it's a how it's supposed to go down I used to grab matas he says was a in fact we know was a because says in many places in ch that came from bi And despite the fact that there was a curse on the family of a but was to but either way came from ab and he said as a he used to maybe out of the hands of children the says he said he felt that he was being by doing it but then when he heard this that he stopped grabbing it however despite the fact he wouldn't grab it but he would still try to finagle to get it. So he would go over to people. He says, you know, maybe he'll give it to me. You know, he did some work to try to, you know, get the account so to speak. So he should be able to get these mat says the other. But then said, I heard the following. the bride. So that says the context over there is the so the says that the sons of but the point is is that that they went ahead and they would grab the mat. They would take the as in these mat and say they weren't really taking something that wasn't there. They were just trying to get what they could have gotten anyways. And still the Tyra used the word but as if they had stolen it. Sabay said that he learned from that it's not even appropriate for a to try to persuade the owner of the mat to give it to him. Right? They were taking what was theirs. Still he felt it was wrong. So therefore said he wouldn't even ask for it. But at the same time said I didn't it also didn't try to work it so that I would end up getting it but at the same time if it was offered to me I would certainly take it then I heard another and the context over there one of our favorite gumas where the gummor says that after passed away there was a that spread inside the mikdash Whereas in the times of the matuna were always so plentiful. There was enough of the they would shack everybody was able to get a nice shar but afterwards and there was very little to go around and thees they used to try to for themselves and said you see for me there's an idea said I stop taking went from literally grabbing the to stopping to take it at all with the exception of the reason is cuz still wanted people to recognize that he's a kay he felt that if he would stop taking maybe people would think that there's a so one day a year with a mitzvah to eat so he would establish himself as a kay that's what he's motive to one day a year take was so that people should recognize that he's a there's an easier way to do it why didn't he just right why didn't say that was always giving and therefore abaya didn't have time to do. So capay was not practical for this was a better way for him to establish himself as being a said if somebody has a lives in his neighborhood or has there's a who knows of who's struggling. He's struggling financially. There's a nice way for him to support him. What could he do? He could be the that he's entitled to to this and then said even what he can do is he could tell the that's going to give him the instead of giving it to me give it to that and when the gives it to the he could be m the never gave it to a kite but bring that to directed him who to give it to as if he gave it to the kite. This is a very big of and and the reason this works is the adds it's only if this directed the is a that most people gave their mata to. So being that he's the ken that everybody was going to makuna establishes some legal ownership on the mat and that allows him to now channel and instruct the who he should go ahead and give it to. So if it's a random cayenne that every now and again gets lucky people give him the mame he would never be able to pull this off. It's only a that's you have an idea by the ley as well. Such a person as in the gets [snorts] some level of ownership on the thing that he's inevitably going to end up getting. And that's what meant would be okay if he wanted to channel it to this who says the gar as it relates to again what was there's a who has a lives in his neighborhood and he wants to support him so he tells the bringing him the instead of giving it to me give it to that there's a mitzvah to give said when goes to that he's not and he gives of bottom line is and Rafa was sitting together they eating in the house of of somebody else and this Y the host prepared an egg that's a thirdborn eagle which appears very often in chas as having been considered to be a a very of piece of meat I'm sh told this So he told the the Gabbi over there, the the shamus, he said that, you know, I know you're entitled to the Moso. I want you please to be mak to me. Meaning use that you have a right as a coin to channel the mat that maybe you'll get to give to somebody else. I would like it. And the reason I want it, Rob said is I want to eat the the tongue. The tongue apparently is part of the thus it's included in this I want to eat it together with mustard either way that's what he wanted says and this did it that night had a dream and in the dream he saw the following a can say from it says a worn out on a cold Okay. Vinegar on the is the equivalent to someone that teaches to someone that has a to a to a bad Talmud. Either way, Rafa had this dream and Rafa was very shaken up by it. And he thought the dream was coming to teach him a message. And he thought that maybe the message the dream was telling him is that the reference that makes in that pk to a aid that has a ra him and he's the badmid cuz he didn't follow what said what happened the ra and saf were sitting together at a sudo. This rabbi was entitled to the matos. Ra said will you please be makas? Ra ate it. Raf safra didn't eat it. had that it's okay to do said if there's a tomb that lives in your neighborhood and you want to give him this is a nice way to do it. So was he was going something that said and he thought that that's what this dream was coming to tell him. So decided that he is going to confront he's going to ask if thinks that that's what went on over here. So he told him no that's not what happened. He said, "Do you think I had this dream because I violated what you said?" told him, "No, absolutely not." He said, "That story that happened with you and Ra has nothing to do with my what do you mean? It sounds very similar." He said, "Yeah, it's similar, but it's not the same." He said," he says, "Number one, what Ra did was very different because Ra put this Gaba in a compromised position." You know, Ra, the god, asked the gaba, "Will you be mazaki to me?" I don't know if this guy really wanted to do it, but you know, if Rava tells you to do something, you're going to listen. So being that it it's not something that was necessarily done, so I don't approve of of what Ra did. So you were right for not eating because even though I said my what did was still inappropriate. Additionally, also I said that it's what was the background of who's struggling. So over there there's an ata there's a nice way to to be mafin but over here you don't have to r wasn't struggling rava wanted to eat tongue with mustard that's not enough of a reason to go ahead and do my time says okay so why did I have this dream so he told him the the dream was meant for ra is that is referring to [snorts] said if the dream was meant for ra should have had the dream why did I have the dream right the talks about the beginning of per all the dreams that Raa had right and abide used to have all the same dreams. So Ra had all these elaborate dreams. He used to go to he was the and he used to always give him bad interpretations. Then he started paying him and he had good interpretations. But either way so let have this dream. Why am I having this dream? So the says told him because in right now so to speak but but right now in they're not communicating to that's why didn't have this dream. Why was Ra nazov? So Rashi says to him, but either way that's the gumar. Incidentally, Rashi asks another question that we don't have time to get into now. We'll have to get back to that ra was also a gar says the cost. So we just mentioned that abaya was a kaya came from bas wasn't ra also a ken. So Rash says yeah was a but didn't want to go ahead and just on his own take the mountain just like used to take it but then realized that he didn't want to take it but he felt that to take it not but here maybe it's different and there he can try to proactively take it meaning to be proactive about it to try to get he didn't want to as however felt that maybe that's going to be different asks the same and says based on this you have to say that throughout the so was it or was it so we mentioned that in where the seems to be describing a bad talid and we compare teaching to a bad like wearing a shirt with holes in it when it's really cold outside. Either way says the who's the bad we meet if somebody teaches. [snorts] So you have which means and we're talking about is gonna be consumed by a fire that can't be fanned. The point is he's going to be in. Why is right? Didn't we just learn in the end that the of is not and here you have that seems to be in the depths of the ter is because he taught it's if you worship as the says someone who gives meaning it's like he's a reference to the bottom line is talking about what is a tama hogness that's already a whole another conversation for another day but the bottom line is exhale so just a few as it relates to the gar that we just learned number one so the gmorra began with the that even though a mayor is exempt from having to give as the says and stating that to the extent that he has a commercial venue where he's a butcher that sells meat even a is going to be obligated to give this and the cave went and said that's not when he's obligated to Israel and then said that there were butchers in Hudel that because of what said they've been in for 22 years and the says what was the significance of of what Rabbar Shaya was reporting. So the Gmorra said the significance is is that being that they were already in for so long for 22 years at that point at that point if we want to confiscate some of their possessions we could do it without prior warnings ordinarily bestd can confiscate someone's possessions but they would require warning that they were for a period of 22 years 22 years at that point you're allowed to do whatever it is you want to do it sounds like from the gar that there's some significance to the number 22. And the truth is is that this number 22 appears many times in just a few gumaras. A person should hope to have a good dream. The Gamarra is talking about dreams and the Gumar says is a is a wonderful thing and for 22 years a person should hope for a good dream. The says in the migill before he was promoted within the ranks of had a different job. He was a barber says the he was a barber in for 22 years. says that was for 22 years used to say used to say but the point is that when did he learn this mid of he learned it from his grace who was rabbi was but in addition to the that we're familiar with he was he had for how for a period of of 22 years. So it's interesting you see this number 22 years. I'll play you another says like this they say about a woman came to it was during a hungry year. She told her, "I swear, I have nothing to support you with." She said, "Rebby, it may not. I hear I hear what you said, but I want you to understand what's at stake over here. If you don't support me, a short while became very sick and he was holding by dying. Beautiful. And they say you said he's going to die at such a young age. says, they tore up the after that story to live another 22 years. Again, you find the number 22. But here we have a [snorts] bas says why is it that when they were 22 years? So he says we know that stalker has an ability to be right. So it says that the was accepted in nowad was going to live longer once it was determined he was going to live longer. The number decided was 22 years based on a pik and paras and it's in the end of paras after steals the from and now as wants to kill. So Rifka goes to her son and says so Rifka calls for her son and tells him you know your brother he wants to kill you listen to me my son go run to my brother love and you should be with him a short amount of until your brother calms down. I'm going to call for you. I'm going to take you from there. And then famously says, "Why should I lose both of you at the same day?" Of course, and the rest is history. But what does Rifka tell? Run away from your brother. For how long says to how long was Yakov away from his parents for 22 years? So you see from here that is a short amount of time. It's it was this is should live longer. How much longer? A short amount of time. What's a short amount of time? Only 22 years. It's a brief amount of time. The significance of says is that when they perceived as being the number is 22 years. Fascinating. You think of 22 years as being a long amount period of time was that they used I came to this. I found it in the where the says so he takes this and he says you can be a lot of these that mention this is a a tremendous it's a it's a ma and seems to be saying that whenever used the number 22 what they're coming to say it's a short amount of time and that's the significance in our gamarra the point is that FOR 22 YEARS IT'S obviously not an hour and a half. It's [laughter] it's it's it's a significant amount of time but still for that amount of time we allow the these butchers to get away with what they're doing. If that much time already passes, it's already beyond the time frame of and they're still holding with their aas. At that point, you can start taking things away from them. You don't even have to warn them. That's the first. The second is so mentioned. So I think it's it bears repeating a beautiful that we spoke out when we learn from the and that is that asks that the says throughout that you were allowed to eat the while you're sitting. So who was entitled to eat was allowed to sit while he ate it. That's in contrast to the avoid where it says in the you had to be standing while you did the is one of the that are mentioned in the not allowed to do the so you can't do the while you're sitting but you're allowed to eat while you're sitting in and yes so how is it possible that the cyen who was eating kic was allowed to sit in the meaning when the says that you're allowed to eat sitting and so you can eat it anywhere in your so you can take it home sit on your sit at your dining room table and eat it and conscious avoid it have to be standing but has to be eaten in theor and if it has to eat in the bazar that's why didn't want the to be because was a mel but he wasn't from Malus Ben was the other king at the time. He was a son of Malik was a son of David. He came from al and he was upset and disturbed that when the other one going to be they were going to come into the [laughter] going to see but standing and the didn't allow him to have the see him somehow as being one a and not being the and as a result he was and he was it all came from the but the point is the point is here it's even while you're sitting and here it's two one says you have to say when the gar says that you can eat sitting it only means it doesn't mean like yesterday that it could be this is different that what does and had the kings not standing sitting. So as a result it could be says it would be okay for the to sit even in the because even though there's a but there's also something called and is so has two roots one says that when the gum says that you're allowed to eat sitting it only meets Not because alternatively says it means even the ter is because of the of but it comes out it comes out then according to first that you're not allowed to eat sitting because so it comes out that even though there's something called the But when the cayenne ate kachasha, it wasn't 100% because he had to stand. How could it be if he's standing? So you can roast it and you can put all the mustard in the world you want. But at the end of the day, he's standing. So it's going to be said and that is very brings a medish where the says that the god was allowed to sit in the aar meaning even though there was one other exception to the rule and that exception to the rule was the so it come out then that the when he ate this is all in place his first when he was eating kachikadash in the he was allowed to sit I ate That's true. There's no but as it relates to the it's going to be different based on that said a beautiful the mentions that the quoted listen to theem's talking to he says who's you go I gave you a By the way, your kids also have a always bothered me. Hashem tells the And then he says, "BY THE WAY ALSO APPLIES TO your children." It should have said it sounds like and then oh by the way FYI because it's only the has the real because only the can actually sit down and eat atko the has certain of lamashka. Roast it mustard. But is it really standing? How could it be? [laughter] You have a real they also have but as it relates to the that's not something that they're going to have. Just one final before we conclude the d and that is so we had over here a garra something very interesting where the garra talked about mitzvah said that he used to go ahead and literally take this in the cave out of the hands of children because he thought that that's a very nice thing he's showing his his mitzvah but then he heard he stopped doing that but he still tried convincing and you know working the back channels to get inva then he stopped doing that but at the very least he would take it and then he heard the price that says that after passed away where there wasn't that much to go around only the used little bit that was there but not felt there's not that much to go around so as a result I'm going to be from I'm going to be I'm not going to do it meaning wanted the mitzvah wanted this roy right ab was of course coming from the right place but he learned the from that was divided into itself that you see that's so in his mind dad felt that that's not the right thing to do there's a very interesting it's the context over there is says a person shouldn't want it someone goes up he stands by the I'm not budging and doesn't want it but he's not going to you're not going to answer the it's in it's says that as it relates to this it's not only true for but it's true for all mitzvah don't fight for mitzvah you know you want to do a mitzvah so you're going to start fighting so that you should be able to do the mitzvah that you want to do You see him and so you see from here that right here says I don't think you have a right from why and this is really that we spoke a lot when we learned and really earlier in this comes up again and again on this and but the point is is that over says that because there wasn't enough there wasn't a to that we know so even though when it says we think it means you can't eat really even what does means that if you you get malus the is only with regards to the but as it relates to the actual is also not said what about mitzvah you sitting at the and there's not a full for you there's not a to go around for every person is there an oras so what about mitzvah or is there no mitzvah that's the bring from this because the says In the times of Shimatic, there was enough to go around. But after Shimati passed away, there was very little. How little each got the size of a pole of fame, right? The pole like the the size of a bean. There was very little to go around. as a result that if you're going to tell me the something called so why would why didn't they want to be but says I'm going to take out one thing from this for sure nobody was being mitzvah in that all it was at best was in that there is and let's say whatever all the raid that it's totally in but at the end of the day in that We would be from from no from even if this says it's not on the same as a fullfled from that how could the bring from that to the concept of when it comes to mitzvah that is not a full-fledged mitzvah That mitzvah over there was a mitzvah. So you have a that when it comes to a mitzvah don't the mitzvah but when it comes to an ordinary mitzvah maybe maybe you should now the truth is has a hisar he doesn't quote argar but of course the isar you see that even though there's a mitzvah of he was so but I'm just going to tell you one one that I found and that is the inhai wrote a few one of them is called so he says like this just a few excerpts and then we'll finish it off I saw my city I'm assuming this is Baghdad with the so everybody had a kasha right back in the day there were people there was a sometimes that would have his and he would be mak to everybody he said sukus in the morning would be waiting outside this person's door. They wanted to go and they to make a so he says I've observed that this person sometimes lives in a small house and everybody is squished he said everybody was trying to go and and take it he says and I've seen that sometimes a person that's a he's a He says, "I've seen people that are standing in line pushing people because they want they want to go ahead and and he says that I've heard from people that people are very upset about this and you know somebody got up once and he said he was he said it would be more appropriate. So he's writing this in a so I thought about it if you want to look it up it's in 138. So he said I thought so like what's the appropriate hashk should they be pushing should the be right or maybe not or maybe the appropriate is do it you know one at a time single file line and you know maybe that's the right way to do it this is what said I feel I think that this scene is a tremendous He says, "Cuz the end of the day, what are you then trying to what are we coping? You're not waiting, you know, outside line Black Friday trying to get something at a discount. This is this is He said the are going on but from a perspective just make sure you calm down you know make sure your heart's not racing when you finally get to the to the it's like this you'll be able to make the with you'll be able to Mr. But as relates to the scene to the banish said he was being on on what was going on and and [snorts] what to some was perceived as maybe the wrong way to go about it but he felt it shows what they have for and he felt that all those will be either way. So a C and an Audi is not obligated in the cave. For that reason, if a Y takes a C as a partner or he takes a non-Jewish partner, he's going to be put as well. Stating that he has to make sure that people know that he has this cayenne partner or this non-Jewish partner because if not, there's a issue. Nobody knows that this person is your partner. And as a result, people are going to think that you're violating the mitzvah of your it sounds like whether your is or whether your is either way you have to do this. If someone has a client that's a partner, he's from but he has to make sure people know that. If however someone has a non-Jewish partner or if somebody sells mikdash which the first Mishna said that if you sell so this is kachin that's no longer kachen we're talking about something that was a carbon it had a and you so right now it's still partner from the mat in those cases so the price is mentioning three examples of animals where you partner from the mat one is you have a k that's a partner the other one is where you have a non-Jew as a partner and the third one is is when you're selling the animal you're but you're still going to be exempt from the mountain says the you have to make it known that you have this partner but not point is even if you have a non-Jewish partner you need to be make this here it's if you have a non-Jewish partner this says you don't need to let people know you have a non-Jewish partner when the non-Jew is in the store says, "Okay, if the price is comparing and contrasting between a partner and a non-Jewish partner, the the context needs to be the same." So, you're telling me that if you have a partner, even if he's in the store, you need to make a he says, "I'll tell you why in the store doesn't mean anything cuz people think he's a customer." Why is a guy in the store mean anything? Maybe people think he's a customer as well. No, what we mean is when do you not have to let people know that you have the non-Jewish partner when he's working behind the cash register? Clearly, he's not a customer. So, as a result, you don't have to be concerned. Says that means again to be consistent, you're telling me that you have to make a even if you have a partner who's working behind the cash register. So, I'll tell you why. People will think that maybe works for you. He's working behind their cash. You trust him with your money. So the says, "Okay, so maybe if they have a non-Jew who works behind the cash register, you should have to make a because people aren't going to realize he's your partner. People will think you trust him." So the gives the obvious answer. No, people wouldn't trust with such a job. Another in general, if there's a a non-Jew in a store, if he was a customer, he'd be negotiating. [laughter] He'd be humbling. And as a result, we assume that if he's in the store, he must be a partner. the fact that you have a Jew in the store, you know, he could be he's he's buying. So, it doesn't matter where he is in the store there, you always have to make a the non-Jew if he's in the store and acting civily. So, the assumption is is that he must be your partner. When it comes to you don't have to make this meaning looks like it's a regular animal that's not looks like it's still you need to make you don't need to make despite the fact that you're not going to give why not says probably because there's a difference between how you sell and how you sell the is not true is coming up. You could sell it the same way you treat because it was once but is not once it's did already. You could do whatever you want with it. So where's the hackers? We're talking about that were sold and as a result such that can't be sold. Rashi says it's referring to me and did the special over there where you're selling it differently anyways. You don't need a hecker from the fact Royal say I am in the cave.