Bechoros 4

Today's stuff is we are at the Mishna two lines from the bottom of Amid B. So we're moving along in the very very beginning of dealing with the of and the oft now the first two do of the as we saw were not the two easiest do in chas pretty intense discussed the first Mishna the Maka which is a very large exclusion in the world of Petar. The law states that as much as a person's firstborn donkey assuming it's a male is going to have it's to be but to the extent that is what the scope of that is then the is you're going to be exempt. [snorts] Today's DH is going to discuss another very fundamental and that is an idea that we're familiar with are from the laws of Bkyus. Now to be clear this is a Mishna later in the paric are from two of the three subcategories of Bkarus. [clears throat] We mentioned right in the introduction to the that when you talk about [snorts] you have to know are you talking about the of all kosher animals that have a firstborn zak with the you have to take the animal give it to the ken assuming it doesn't have a he brings it as a it's going to have a kachim are you talking about a firstborn which has its unique or are you talking about a human being para of so all can really be divided into three groups. Those three groups are very prominent in the world of and the reason is because and let's go backwards from everybody knows that they're also from the laws of but as it relates to that has a firstborn then it is going to maintain regardless our daf today which begins with aishno is going to discuss the laws of as it relates ates to when they're from which means either or stating that the overwhelming majority of the is actually going to be a little more like a in fact it's going to discuss the status of when the yidden were in the midbar and from there as we're going to see the garra is going to deduce certain that are very much in specifically as it relates to the Mishna and that is the fact that a from certain elements of the but being that the [snorts] of the as we're going to see is very much related to the laws of when the midbar it has vibes it requires us to give a little bit of an introduction and go through some in the some of them incidentally we already went through in others. So just very very briefly while the were initi I want you to make and it doesn't matter if it's they're going to have several later the says it's going to be that when you going to enter the land of Cananan. Your child is going to ask you what is this all about? By the way, we're going to see more about this tomorrow. But in Mikra this question which is one of the four questions Rashi says this is the child that's he's going to say maz you know what he's commenting on you know what he's remarking on the par of he's going to wonder what is this all about so you're going to tell him all about I'm skipping a little bit and then you're going to get to the punch right for that reason. So the Tyra says that came to while he and the and he told him meaning it sounds like the entire gamut of and not just that he gave the reason for why the are going to have and this is a very important reason it's not just important because it's not just important in the world of the and the and the in This is important because every single father when he gives over a to his child has to know this because you have to be you have to be armed and dangerous. You have to have this script. You have to tell him that the reason all the have is because when took the killed all the it's for that reason of the are going to have one thing is clear that when there was already took place when the it happened literally at the very moment of makar. Now let's fast forward to parides comes to again this is I want you to know that I've taken the for myself from amongst the what am I going to do with the I want to swap out the who I took for self back in par's boy when I said when I said well I'm going in another direction I want to take the now and I want them to be mine instead of the being mine now why would have done that [snorts] if fellishly called he want the behu why all of a sudden is so we know the rest of the story. It's related to the ketel because sinned by the ketel but there was one group of yidden that did not sin by the was in fact when came down and he said so the entire levy gathered together but the whether they were from Ru or Yehuda it didn't matter they did not join Rabenu on the same level that Ley did and it's for that reason Ley now all of a sudden has this incredible milo that they were the ones that answered the call of lie the have this terrible that they were complicit in the they did not heed the call of and it's for that reason despite the fact they had but moving forward who says I don't want it to be that way fast forward several later and again comes to Mosha and he tells him you remember I told you that I want to swap out the together with the yes okay let me tell you exactly how it's going to play itself out meaning the have kadusha you can't just go ahead and and take away kadusha we've learned enough timi together to know that if something has kadusha even though there's a concept where you can remove kadusha from something sometimes yeah sometimes not but there's a process it's known as pigon in the vernacular but there's a mahal of exactly how that works is going to come to mo now and he's going to give him the mahalik how exactly is this pigion going to take place I want you to go and I want you to count I want you to count every single doesn't matter what is from I want you to count every single one as long as he's one month or older and come to me with a number. And then what I want you to do is I want you to take the for me the Sim and I want you to then take the swap them out for all these. And by the way, this is very important for today's I also want you take the and I want you to use them So, not only are we going to swap out the human, but we're going to swap out the says. So, the first thing was told was count. So, he goes and he counts all the drum roll. What was the number? It was 22,000. 273. So, the final tally was 22273. 22,273. Here's part two. Now, I want you to take the and I want you to take them like I told you. But the 273 that are above and beyond that are more than the amount of that we have. Well, what are you going to do with them? Now, the rest of the story is some of the that we didn't learn together. And that is that earlier in pious counted everybody. And when he came to the Levim, the tally was 22,000, which meant there were 22,000 levim 22,273 Israel. So, the 22,000 swapped with the 22,000, but there 273 is that don't have a ley to be swapped out with. So, what are you going to do with that? You should take five shekels. Five for each one of those additional and each should be made up of what do you do with the money? you give it to and that's going to be the pigion for the he went ahead and he did what he did from 273 people he took five shekels and the does the math for us what we end what he ended up with was 1,365 shekels they just they just won the lottery had this big windfall as like told to do so in parades who why because then happened the world would never be the same after the even though took us back and he gave us another bris and we got and to a degree we saw that we even hadn't seen prior but at the same time at the same time the world would never be the same and one of the shiny was [snorts] that whereas The was supposed to be the it as it relates to the now it was going to be the but the already had how exactly are we going to swap out the kadusha from the can't just make them from into there has to be some process something's going to happen so what was that process every single that had a ley to correspond to him it's just an easy swap I'm a bkar I'm Levy. Nice to meet you. Somehow there's some energy that goes from Bkar to Levy. Boom. He becomes Hulen. He becomes Kaides. They both live happily ever after. But what about the 273 Israel that didn't have a ley to shake hands with the Tyra says you should go and you should take the and give it to. Now this pion of is eerily similar to what we know as as without a question we'll even see it in the d but at the same time it's not the same thing it's not the same thing right it's a different concept that's a mitzvah this was over here by the way it all went to a there every father has a right to pick and choose which kayen he wants to go ahead and give it to but the bottom line is without a question. This is related to the general idea opinion albeit a version of it. By the way, not only was there opinion on the human, but there was also opinion as it relates to the behemoths as well. Either way, a little bit of an elaborate introduction, but I believe a very critical introduction as we start now. Now which law of now we already gave away a little bit in the first introduction to the and that is that are from two of the three categories of the and as it relates to so if you have that idea you already know you can narrow it down to either or if you take a look at Rash in The gar's initial reaction of the gar is going to be that we're dealing with it makes sense that the gar would think that because the first Mishna talked about and really the first like right the beginning of the whole first part of the entire track day deals with the laws of of but regardless we'll go with if They preded the of the in the midbar then certainly they should have the ability to go ahead and potter their own. So the the had the ability to potter the in the midbar. So there's no question they should have the ability to potter their own as well in really this is what's going to usher in the rub ahead on in the what's the again we're dealing with so what we're saying is that a from they have a that is going to give birth to a firstborn zakar They're not going to have the laws of [snorts] why they potter first of it's a big sh what the first of the right but as relates to the so it's the first of the it's a basic what's the inbar if they the way the gar understands it now pattered the of the when we're in the midbar then certainly they should have the ability to p their own. It sounds like what the Mishna is saying is that the way the yiddens lost its kadusha when they were in the midbar is because the ley the gof the human ley had the ability to go ahead and to potter that and being that the ley had the ability to potter the ley should have the ability to potter his own sounds like that's what the mission is saying the problem is it's factually incorrect in the ley himself self. We went through it just now says the the human that was the swap with the human. But as relates to the that happened as the says I don't understand how to read the mission the seems to be saying that the [snorts] if they themselves they should p their own it's not what happened they themselves did not pter the it was their behemoth that ped the says This is the way you have to read the meaning. You're right. From the simple reading of the sounds like they themselves that's not true. So do a tiny edit in the not but rather once you make that edit it's a their had the ability to potter the of the is certainly their behemoths would have the ability to potter their own let's just explain this a drop out spoiler alert it's going to emerge from the gammorra that the behemer of the levian that pred the of the yid when the yid were in the midbar in the beginning of paridar was the in fact just like it would be the that has the ability to be that's what took place over there it wasn't the of the lady that'sing the meaning it's not symmetrical with the way the opinion worked The the ley potters the it's and it's apples and apples as opposed to as it relates to the way the of the potter it was with the it was with the which is symmetrical in terms of the way it would be and that is the pinion of the in a different takes his own he this is a little bit of a different [snorts] but it's says for sure as we'll see in the But the bottom line is the way this happened was it happened with the so essentially what the Mishna is saying the way abai is learning it is that if the had the ability to the would have the ability to his own I hear it's very nice meaning the way you edited the I call but the problem is not what the says the doesn't Hey, it says it sounds like the Levian themselves are are doing the pottering. And not just that, if you're right that the that a ley should be from is because of his you have to had the ability to potter the it should have the ability to potter his own as well. Then should be that his itself should also be from the laws of why we learn in a we mentioned this element meaning if the is so if the has the ability to it should have the ability to say as well. Now to be clear, you don't find that the se of the ley pred the of the is in the midbar. [snorts] You find that we'll see more about this not that but at the same time is saying if the then just like it because of these two said I agree with you we have to have to learn this but let me tell you the way I think we should learn this the not talking about the Mishna is talking about the next mission is going to talk about but this Mishna is actually not talking about rather it's talking about and the says that themselves from because if they themselves again rabb likes the word and he's not willing to walk away from it. So if they themselves were able to certainly they would have the ability to pan themselves. Now stating that says even though the that's mentioned in the Mishna is talking about [snorts] but it is relevant still to the location location of the because once I know this I'm also going to know that says let me explain to you okay so this is the that's the source to this idea that is going to be part from how do you know he's part from and again we know from the on the says this is another in the talks about this is in that juaposes the and the and we learn from the association based on the so too based on the bottom line is how to learn the Mishna says the is talking about and seems to be saying that the reason from is because they themselves potter themselves from because if they pottered the midbar then they should be able to pot their own the problem is that's not what happened they did not p the says potter the how do you read the two according to the Mishna is talking about you just have to do a an edit not but if they're the then it certainly makes sense that it should be that way for themselves as well. According to Raa that edit is too much and as a result ra learns that the Mishna is not talking about what we thought in the it's not talking about but rather what is it talking about it's talking about if it's talking about the missionaries beautifully if they were the pinion for the well then certainly they themselves would be able to their own so that makes sense that they should be subject to the laws of of [snorts] according to how do we know the fact that that's a separate that's being it says and we learn from there once we establish so too they're going to Now, if you want to just close the loop here a little bit, good segue for the next part of the D. So we know according to Abaya how it is meaning what is the that the and the levy is part from you learn it from we know according to ra how what the source is that a ley is pot there from we also know according to is that there from it's learned that from the what we don't know the one thing the didn't speak out is according to what's the and we know it's a so we know this is a from both we have both according to is a is a heish we know half the story according We know it's the mission on the bottom of the base. What we don't know according to is what the is stating that Rashi speaks out and it's that it's poss the identical that the Mishna said with regards to the is going to be true as it relates to Adam as well. So purposes moving forward now in the once was that there's a it's that is going to be a valid as well is merely whether that's what the mission is talking about but as it relates to the setup of the it goes without saying it's posh it's posit that is going to hold the brother's. So according to and is going to be as it relates to the just like the first Mishna and the third Mishna is talking about and is willing to be mik a little bit to make that work but he's not fundamentally opposed to being as a matter of fact it's part to him it's part to him that that that's the according to the is the only fork It's not the now really for the same price you could have made the same you could have said that is not fundamentally opposed to the ofay he just holds it the is more if you learn not if you learn that's off the table because rava himself said that that's not true so it sounds like ra has a fundamental issue has a fundamental issue not only with the ofaya but he has a a fundamental issue with the of but in the reverse you don't find that has an issue with the bottom line is again [snorts] we have had to learn the Mishna additionally we're skipping all the obvious and the need to be spoken out now in terms of what the are to these two you find from both of according to as says the only soaf returns to and he's going to ask him kashas. Now we're going to see is going to ask a bunch of kashas. The first kasha the Rafa is going to ask is going to be a kasha only anabaya and then he's going to say you know what I'm going to ask you kashas as well so it's going to be one kasha only and then three additional kashas the three additional kashas are going to be and [snorts] according to you that you learn is talking about and is the is of meaning what that the The reason from is because their set is going to the setter of the Israel certainly should be able to pter their own. He said well let me ask you a question. What would be if there was a ley back in the day back in who didn't have a well if he didn't have a what should emerge is he should be in [clears throat] that's what should come out right or the said so for him the is in play but to the extent that he didn't have a he back in the day should now what's the point our mission is not really talking about back in the day. I'm just talking about how but unless you can tell me that back in the day every single ley was potter you're going to have no way to tell me that today every single lady should be right let's explain this even a drop we're saying it's all going to emerge from the garra but it's a little tricky and a little nuance the Mishna says every single lady is pot why because 3,000 plus years ago there was some sort of pinion that that took place okay what does that have to do with now here so you'd have to have some limu to bridge the gap the gar is going to bring a posic for it. But at least the starting point is the and that is that's the way it was then. Now I'll find a step. I'll get some sort of some sort of I'll have a for you. that'll be able to say if all the were then they're going to be part but told if the to the is the NOT EVERY WAS THEN AND IF NOT EVERY was part then there's no way in the world every should be part now he continued and he sent according to you and according to a lifka to the extent that you have a a ley that was one month old at the time of bida perkimal Well, someone like that should be excluded from but if you're he should not be excluded. What's this? It's because not all of were included in this whole pion. You had to be right the had to be that's the 30 days. But the lady that was the also had to be which means that if there was a lady that wasn't he himself was not involved in the pig. Now this is a sai according to according to why is that because hold that there's a lim in this that's being learned from according to it's according to it's according to it's only of but at the end of the day as it relates to him for sure even that it's being learned from and the only time the lady had the ability to be was if he was a which means then that if he was less than you don't have the if that's the case not only am I muching on the according to you as it relates to say he says only because according to what's the learned out from the but according to you didn't have a should I think that's what comes out in math and if there was someone who wasn't 30 days at that time, so he wasn't involved in the opinion. So when he got older and now all of a sudden he acquires possessions if he has a firstborn child he should be and if he has a he should be and that's a another he said what about is a bas lady who marries someone that's not that if she has a firstborn child that child should not be exempt from that slave you as a child is what's the is that if the to the is what is from what took place in that you see the were they should be p themselves well it was only the zers that were ped that's obvious it wasn't How could it be that is going to be included in this? Now the interrupts and the says as it relates to that kasha doesn't bother me so much why said that when it comes to the laws of it's totally in the and being that it's totally in the it's for that reason the levie is included and it's not just the leies now before we explain what the means to be what was saying was is that really if you think about it the laws of Ben is a little bit of an anomaly Because usually when you have a parish of a it's not in a when it comes like why should it be that way it's a right it's a but at the same time that is a very very novel idea it it seems to be again an anomaly it's not usually the way it works so Rob explains it is said because the the of is the so the plays such a big ro. So it makes sense that if the baby the is of even though that child is really I feel is going to be again it's a little bit of kadesh but this is the way Rob explained by the just to bring out what a bigish it is because in your classic case of where the father is a uh a cayenne or a ley it doesn't matter if his wife is a levia or a cayan either way that's posit that his son is going to be potter even Oh dear is it's not a but even though that's not the classic conventional case but being that plays a role it makes sense that that's the way it should have to bear now as it relates to third kasha levia because if the underlying source for how we know that the levim and the kayan are excluded from paban traces itself back to back midbarim while the levia were not included by midbar said son that doesn't bother me kasha What's the terret? What's the terret? How to learn? They're both we'll go [snorts] with Rashi says that is not really answering much because if the source to the is the from the parish of wasn't excluded. You can tell me from today till tomorrow. I can tell you as far as why even a ley that didn't have a s you know should be included in the because he's a ley at the end of the day. is 3,300 something years ago his didn't have a set that's not necessarily a reason that he should be excluded but says if it's a lovely is what it is this is the rashi says the knows that all the is saying is that saf you're not asking another kasha go you just found another had asked the same kasha you already asked that kasha I got that kasha I got it already meaning you're mching right now that aen and a ley if their whole tour is paragimal. So maybe a kayen even back in the day that didn't have would have been excluded or a kay that was less than 30 days old would we have to answer that kasha because if we can't answer that then there'd be no way to apply it to the who had no to that pigment you would have to say that were somehow and as a result so too based on a lim that we didn't see at in we're going to have to relate it to all the future. We're going to have to do that. The minute we do that, we're going to know is included because meaning it's another way to ask the same kasha. But the gar is saying that again this way doesn't like this malik because the gumar seems to be piling on. The gar asked the first kasha and a second kasha and by the way the gar is going to ask a fourth kasha which is all in the same signal. So this third says rash. But finally fourth we know was not included even though was from right he is the but he was not counted. How do we know that? So if you look in a in a in a paragl there this on top of's name and the reason said was a minion because it's in the context of the minion and a har wasn't included in the minion. Well, if that's the case himself should be. So the said the answer to that is and really the way Rashi explains this if you look at the last on the answer to all the is it says in the by the way it says it multiple times and we learn from there and it's true the way it played itself out was there were only certain that had the of being but all the cotusha and hashem took every single ley at that point is in terms of the mechanics of how the logistics worked themselves out. There were only certain you had to be Benesh and you had a but you want to know every single le became kadesh and once he became kadesh he was in included in what role was and that was removing the from the and it's for that reason it's going to be even the ley doesn't have a say even the ley that's less than 30 days old it could be even the levia and it could be even says the one second if that's then what about this is a double number one it's a cash on the mission the mission said so you just found the for to answer all the what this is also the fourth of fourth was and the fact that you have I mean if the are not included and certainly is not included this is in many places in I don't know if it's in 24 places but it's in a lot of places in 24 places I refer to as I'll give you one example so once it says even though the ared from the iron raid bites but the bottom line is they are still referred to as and it's for that reason they are going to be included says We're not done yet, right? Because at the end of the day, so says that all the somehow are considered in but what does that have to do now? That was that par as we mentioned it should be that way now. It says and the de is from the word [snorts] that just like the had the ability to potter then that they had meaning they were potter themselves because they pred based on the and the heck so this is the way that they are going to be. So the bottom one is just to come up for breath for one second. We didn't finish yet the first part of the daff but just to come up for breath and that is that the said is the talking about that's the way learn or is it talking about that's the way learn but one thing is that also what is the that's also According to it's all from the parish according to is that's the Mishna is learned out from if the underlying according to everything according to ra half the equation is from pergiml shouldn't the of the levian be limited to people that actually had the ability to potter it was rasafra's Kasha. Yes. The same kasha came out four different times in four different ways. And the said, but at the end of the day, okay, now the teaches me even says the one of the things that emerged from the gumar that we just learned. Now we spoke it out in as part of the introduction sort of took it for granted but only based on this gamar is that the way the pakam of the yidden became potter in the midbar. It was the set of the ley that was the py. So the ley set pattered the of the Israel. Where did we see it? Who was really the first one to introduce it? So Rashi says it wasafra whereafra asked his first. So really as far as we know it's not the talks about the doesn't say a word about the it's not a anywhere it's not a it's like the first one in this that went ahead and said it and the asks really how do you know that it was the who said a word about said I'll tell you why because we find that would happen with and we find would happen with a set. Now just like as it relates to the you find that it wasn't only it was also in the 273. How did they get their pigeon? They got it with the same amount of money by the way. Five shekels. Well, if that's the case, it makes sense. It should be the same way. In other words, I'm learning it. You find that the which has the ability to be has two things that can be and says as it relates to the same thing that was is what was. So, it makes sense then as it relates to as it relates to the if it is what was it should probably be what was says I could ask a if that I have a little bit of an issue because I could always argue I could always argue that maybe is different because you find that you could be paish and you could be rightf is much more of pa than is so af which is a real p. So it could be it makes sense. You're right. It was pirus. It was also but again it's matim because you find this incredible ability for to be p rightf with a you go for a pig with guilt. Certainly if you want it to work out right that's the way you're supposed to DO IT. SO in the world of you know it's not a good a little bit we have a right if this sounds familiar it should because this was that he used and we learn as just like it's relates to it was old if it was then you could ask but it's not from the and just like there was as it relates to so does as it relates to as it relates to the of I want to that as it relates to when the one once had the ability to be to many many said I'll prove it to you because the went through all the math how many were there 22,273 how many levim were there 22,000 do 273 each one had to give five shekele 1,365 shekel that all went Right? So the Tory gets very uh granular, very nitty-gritty, dollars and cents, literally crossing the te's and down in the eyes when it comes to the money. Yet yet when it comes to the behemoths, we just say, "Yeah, the behemoth of the behemoths of the Israel, right? There's no doesn't make any sense. There must have been some why we not say maybe it just worked and because it worked, that's why you don't have to worry." Meaning maybe there weren't so many behemoths. were enough. Maybe the only reason we're getting involved in the numbers by the people is because the numbers did not match. But to the extent that they would match, everything would have been fine. all the combined and says it still could work because maybe we have to be the of the and when we're it doesn't say we're being ped with the of the even the actual pidion of ley to humanar it was all and nothing to do with so if that's the I don't know if that necessarily has to be a China because it could be you're right if you would take all the of the isra would be way way more just you know ruin and god had mn that was but at the same time what over here is all the behemoths of the levian corresponding to only the of the soar says I hear I hear what you're saying and based on that you have to say this is not something uh that we're deriving from the but rather it says So when the Torah talks about so it says you should also take the and so you see one was able to part many but the says and it's a lot and it means many you know what that is Eric meaning you're right 100% the word in a vacuum like inal can mean even many but if in the same you find and bean well then it's pretty obvious that we're we're coming to make a dick over here and the dick is that one se of the ley had the ability to potter many of the Israel said the issue because the Mishna says is that can use one to many. Now Rashi says how do you do that? Once you do the pion you take the set and you give it to the kay. So Rashi says what the Mishna means is you can always buy back the s and then use it again. But if you want to rinse and repeat the same s that is something that you're allowed to do. What's the shot? That sounds like a little bit of a kesh. Why would you be able to do that? Oh, it's probably it's probably because in the midbar the original in that happened with a that took place out. It was once said that was many. So just like it happened then it's for that reason it can happen here as well. In fact, says that you should know that really that's what was coming to say is not just giving you he's not telling you a history class. He was coming to say a real but really this last discussion is really very much discussion. What was this last discussion? We recaped the previous parts of the daf. This last part of the daff was discussing how do you know that when the the hamus of the levian were being ped what they were being pa was what they were being pied was the the it was the set that was being pa maybe it was some some other animal and not just that it was one animal that right sounds like there's some sign there's a huge significance I'm telling you is a set and I'm telling you one set you know where that's going to be nega because when you're going to have or you should go ahead and be so that too is a meaning it's the same para and just like here one say had the ability to so there one say is going to have the ability to p as well it got laid early so we're going to hit the pause button now cuz really the gar now is going to shift to an entirely different suga equally critical in terms of understanding the parish of when the midbar so uh the plan was to make it all the way knee deep into but uh we should know this already. So we're going to prematurely hit the pause button and just speak out one classic and that is in parishes this is emperic it's gimmel it's one of the many in parishes that talk about the idea of he quotes the says that why is it that is with says says do you shi because the column equals and when was sold by his brothers he was sold for kf and being that yadic was sold for kassf it's for that reason some connected mid every single year when he's p his first born you're going to use the same amount of money that was used in the mak of and at first glance theella it's aella because what does one have to do with the other he says but even more than that if the punchline is it's like an oish ku the yid is being punished and the yid right now has a responsibility when he has a firstborn child to take uh out his wallet and give money to the cayenne and he's being punished because his za was involved in the makv says why is giving and by the way who is he giving it to who is the at first glance this is a p it's says it's a short piece but it's so every word there is is mayor and that is he says what's the whole Indian of of The Indian opinion is like the says over and over and over again and that is when did not want to send us out. So said you don't want to send us no worries I'm going to do it my way. It's a zer. It's a way of remembering the events that took place at we spoke out from the who in his systematic where he says if you take all the things that we do as you can divide them into three buckets all the mitzvah that are associated with that and that's all related to the and then you have the carbon that's related to the fact that happened on that night and THEN THERE'S THE ALL the in all three categories of it and that's related to the fact of and it's clear that there was something so significant that the yidden saw in that it begets these mitzvah in the world of the it's a full category equal to the and equal to the carbon dimension now what was it what did the yidden seek and his everyone can say their and is what they didn't saw then was an incredible they saw because what happened what happened was there was a where every single Egyptian died but the didn't it's it's a and really what it is is that you could have a a a group of millions of people and who is literally singling out you yeah you know you yeah you know the way the needle was threaded at the time of makus showed that was and it's so critical in terms of the avoid of the amuno the right that was supposed to take out of the events of that a fool's there's mitzvah in the that are going to be dedicated to that to show that was on us in such a nuance and such a granular way says it would have been mock to think that that had on was something that came about when the cried and the davin and remembered the he made to the office and said instead of me operating with the shame and now I'm going to show you the and it was then that showed a level of that climax with he definitely could have thought that what happened up until that point I don't know maybe we were forsaken maybe wasn't paying such such close attention to us for a person to think that way that's not the way it is read it inside because there's no such thing as When a person has it and then has Yeshua from it gave the person that sorrow with the same level of that he removed it with because understood that the that I have towards this person and the eternal love that I have to this person is saying it's telling me right now that he needs this says it goes without saying with the fact that was for FOREIGN that's when they went to they went with that same level of so says when we remember the incredible pro this that showed us at the time of Maky that showed us at the time of the Yeshua. You know what we also do? We remind ourselves of the incredible that showed us when the Torah began. When did the began? It began with that's when it all began. It began with when the brothers sold Ysef to Mitim. What happened then? What happened then? One thing led to another which led to another which led to another until finally we ended up in Mitim for 400 years and 210 years and 86 years and that's when everything came to an end. But when we remember and what we're remembering is the incredible that showed us at the time of the we're reminding ourselves of something else. What we're reminding ourselves of is that that incredible that incredible hashka that we had at the time of the at the time of the is something that was really with us at the time of the as well says we're going to see in tomorrow's the is going to ask why is it that from all the non-cooser animals that the chose to give to the only chose the and the is going to give a reason says lafina I would say a different reason it's because you remember when the brothers came down to mit the first time. How did they travel? They traveled with the Pik says it so many different times. The says they came with that. And what we're trying to show is is that we acknowledge now at the time of the gul this incredible but we also recognize that when we went down it was done with the same exact the same when was sold for and when the brothers went down with that was done with the and that's why inside the zikur that we make for the we we're maser as well we're massacre the we massacre as well inion of the fact that it was a because we're showing that didn't suddenly emerge and surface at that later part of the story. It was there literally from the beginning. I think on the side of the Everyone mooches a little bit. Why in the beginning of the seder would you start with the remember of the it's because the beginning of the story and again this is a ver that others have said in different but the of is that the same the same wasn't just p you know we missed one this one got out of you know I'll get you back don't worry I owe you one that's not what happened it was the same in the flood that we saw at the time of the when Hashem chose the Israel in a good way and the in a bad way. That same hash was being manifest at the time the was being sold. And that's this of starting the starting it with a it's the same exact vein of the as it relates to and the fact that it's a but that's this says we have to take out of the par of what we have to take out of the paras is the fact that it's one of the three but in the zikur of the of the is also a zikur of the hashk of the golos because it's the it was the same level of he understood this is something that we needed and that's why when we remember the fact that Hashem was watching over us we remember the as well because we come to we come to that that's something that was also done for our good you know yesterday was today is we ender by screaming seven times on the top of our lungs I heard from he said why is it the last thing that we send he said what's he doing for we're ding we're asking We don't want din. We want we don't want din. But then at the end of we turn we say I hope I hope I hope I was genched with au and I hope everything worked out. I understand that if in your infinite wisdom you feel that maybe something is not going to go perfect. I want you to know I understand. is what we scream seven times is we tell I'm being I hope it worked out and it worked out but at the same time at the same time I'm being it needs to surface somewhere I understand that just like there's a flaw ine there's and sometimes feels people have to go through for whatever reason but the bottom line is I understand that you anything you're doing you're doing for my good we scream after with an acknowledgement of we should be we shouldn't have to worry about but the and really this is the way the yid lives the yid and that's what's gotten the through gullis what's gotten him through gullis is is remembering and remembering not only the flood that happened at the end but recognizing that the story from beginning to the end from that far back going back to going back to THE GOING BACK TO THE donkey the means of transportation that theatim used when they made intimate it's all from hashemi camp.