Bechoros 36

You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under their category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. Today's is and we have five lines from the bim of so the Mishna on discussed whether a roy a shepherd is believed to say that akar that now has [clears throat] a m developed its ma and wasn't done. Additionally, the Mishna discussed whether a cayenne is believed was that a cayenne is never believed. Why? Because being that you certainly can't trust a to say about his own, it means that a is a and holds that once somebody is auding that he's a and he can't testify. He can't be an aid either. when it comes to his own he's even when it comes to somebody else's accord that holds that once somebody is a for something he can't be a dian or an aid with regards to that area and based on that said in our way the gumar explain that aan is always possible to say with regards to the history of that soap We know another and that is there's a discussion amongst comes up in different if someone is in one area does that make him or not you have it in is that so let's do the arithmetic is he's if he's if someone is a for a specific he can't be a or an aid for that. If that's the case according to a should never be able to be a do you know his question was it should come out that a can never pass it. So okay maybe maybe a ken does the avoid maybe a ken has his role in the coin mayor maybe weren't but said that can't be the says referring to the kan it's a that one of the jobs of the was to be a po we'll speak out some rate on that later but being that we know for sure is allowed to be a dian andita is that and also is that if somebody is for a specific area and we know it's according to just put all these pieces of the puzzle together and what it emerges is that can't be a we know that's not true. That was what said it's true has but the only time a mayor said that is if you know for sure two Adam came and said that this person is if we know for a fact that somebody is then and then this whole would make sense but when we say that they're enough to say but not enough to say that they have a they should be because at the end of the day all it is is meaning there's a difference in semantics with regards to the definition of the word as it relates to versus as it relates to considered with regards to enough that they should be but they're not enough with regards to that they should have a so that they should now bear. So another one of the things that the Gar discussed on was the that you need to determine the history of a of a that akar has again when a or inspects the of akar he has to determine two things. Number one, is this the type of mum that's number two did the m develop or did somebody do a bay? Because if somebody did it is you wouldn't be able to be m and the way to for the to determine how the came about would be by being and there was a discussion there's a car of belief what about what about on that note what if somebody comes and he says I didn't see the develop by itself but somebody else told me and that person saw now ordinarily that's what's known as aba is a basic that's 101. If you're going to say, you have to say about something that you yourself saw. You can't say that somebody else told me. So what about as it relates to the only time is by she's in right now. She has no idea where her husband is. She hasn't heard from him in a while. Is that in is believed to say that this woman's husband died so that she'd be able to get married. It's what's known as is there a lot of kois in is we'll see more about that later. And said that the only time is when it's this is not a how could you tell me that works when it comes to it's not and we know it's only by that it's okay. says she said I had a different not rather only with regards to not this is a case where that is believed and for that reason is going to be okay was once like a me and so you have Ravashi and Ravi and you have but either way soar said he was not so happy with what had on he said oh he was either way at me said had an animal we do not know whether this animal is a or it's not a and now the cen walked into it sounds like it was any random person. It was actually the himself and he said that it's a and he said oh but by the way you see this m that it has the mum developed on itself. Now ordinarily a is not believed to say on his own animal that the m developed by itself stating that said in this case he's going to be believed. Why? Because in this case without the testimony of the cen we would have no way of knowing whether the animal is a bakar or not. The the is the one who told us he informed us that this is a being that it's only because of what he said that we even know that there's a sh over here. Therefore, [snorts] he's believed. Why? It's what's known as pesares. Meaning, if we knew for a fact that this animal was a then of course the wouldn't be believed to say that the it has developed on its own. But being that without the testimony, we would have no way of knowing that it was a bar. So really if the cayenne wanted to lie, he wanted to be audit is because of what he said. He's ashy anyone that have alert knows in fact a woman said I was married. So a woman comes to town nobody knows if she's married if she's single can she get married or not. And she said as follow I want you to know I was married but I got divorced. So that is the menace. She's believed. Now if we knew for sure that she was married, she wouldn't be believed to say. She would have to have a can't just go ahead and say. But being that over here, we did not know anything about this woman. And she could have said she's a and not had any issues. Even though she said, she's now believed to say that she's a bottom line. So I don't need to tell me now is talking in the context of and was talking in the context of but it comes down to the same principle I would have thought over there the woman is believed why she believed because of the she wanted a lie she just wanted to get married then she didn't have to say anything she said something she's now believed to say that really she's a gusha But over here, he had to say something. This had no choice but to go and bring this animal to a you know why? Because even though the what comes from this to be but they want to eat kach and the only way this kayen can know for sure that he's not eating kach is if he goes to the tells him that this is a a good m so he has no choice but then to go to a a being that he has to go to a he doesn't have a paser means you didn't have to talk you could have been quiet this woman comes to town oh she didn't have to tell him when she was married why'd you say you're married oh you said you're married. So you put yourself into a mess. You stuck your foot in your mouth. So you believe now to say that. But over here, what are you going to say? Didn't have to do anything. He could have just eaten the No, he couldn't have because if he didn't know for sure that it had a he'd be violating. It's true that he's when it comes to being but he's not to eat it without knowing for sure that it has a you need a to determine whether or not it's a there's no real over here. But the says so that's why needed to say that even in the case of the maybe you don't have what's why is there gives a very obvious response you could have given it an obvious moment and in that case there would have been a sh right you go to a shil where something you go to when something's questionable but if it's not questionable you have to go to a even the man on the street can pass in certain moment there are certain women that are very very obvious there certain women that are pawn And there's certain M that are obvious. This person still has a Per What are you going to tell him? He had to go to he had to tell him to know if it's a because otherwise he'd be eating. No, he didn't. What he could have done was given it an obvious m never told anybody anything about it and everything would have been okay. The fact that he showed up, told us that it was a notified us that it's a he has a therefore he's believed to say that the developed by itself. So meaning what we're saying is that even though ordinarily considered to be that's the theme that underpins these suggest a classic there was a person that rented a donkey from his friend The maser told the you want to borrow you want to rent my donkey that's okay but don't go because there's water there and I'm afraid that my is going to be damaged go better take that highway he didn't listen and he went he came back and he told listen I I I have to make a confession I did what I wasn't wasn't supposed to do. You told me not to go. I went, but by the way, but there was no water and it's not why it died. It didn't die because of water. It dropped dead. It had nothing to do with water. The question was, do we believe the or do we not believe the said he's believed? Why? He has if he wanted, he could have said and he would have gotten mad at us. So, what are you concerned? Maybe he's lying. Maybe really it did get damaged in water and this in which case the is now going to be responsible. I think we should trust him that that's not what happened because had that been what happened or had if he was lying he could have just simply said that I went the way you told me to go the animal died and he would have avoided this whole court case. Therefore he has a malakaya and famously responded to he says there's no migo over here. You know why? Cuz even though there was no real Adam here, but says there's an inco there's always water. And that there's always water. We don't believe in him that there was that when he said there was no water and it died by himself. What do you mean? He has a migu. He could have said I went there. That's true. He has a migu. Your migu essentially is telling me to believe something that contradicts and or they're synonyms of each other. What's we say here too? Now it's not amigu. We're dealing with this works with the migu. But it doesn't matter. The point is that just like so to argues the and here this is contradicting which the proverbial that says that this is so what do you want to tell me even though we have an established understanding that to be but being that over here there's a there is going to override that he's a just like you find that so why do we say and again the gar gives a similar ter to what gave earlier there's a very big difference there was always water in the that's a real says is there anah meaning what the Gar is saying is is that even though we have a whole to be but we have to take it with a grain of salt we have to appreciate it's all it is so you want to trust them no but it's not like there's an there's no so the said pre in the beginning of the with regards to what do you mean and it impacts but they're Same as here if the would have a migu or ani or a to establish that he wasn't you going to tell me what do you mean there's an was there's an THAT THERE'S A THAT there is but at the end of the day all it is is sitting and he said over this that said that if a walks into town with a animal that we don't know anything about. So we don't know if it's a Bakar or not a Bakar and he says that there's a and that the M happened by itself. He's believed even though usually wouldn't be believed but because being that we only know that it's because of him said over and he didn't mention it in the name you just saying it over. You should know by the way that the author of this is feeding the he fed it barley and he put it into a basket. So there's a little bit of a toml what the propag is but the bottom line is he put it in a in a basket. The basket was made of wood and wicker and there was some sharp edges. As the was eating the barley it heard it slip, it developed the brought his animal to was seek I know ordinarily is not believed to say that a bakar has developed on its own. Tella I'm telling you what happened. These are the facts. My animal was eating from a a basket. He was eating barley, cut its lip. That's how it developed. But I I know I'm not supposed to be believed. But he said, you know, maybe I am believed. Why? Because just like you find when it comes to that, but we're not. So [snorts] maybe when it comes to the same is true. And that was the question he posed to Rabu. Sodic believed to say that the mum developed on its own or not. Why should you say of course not it's in the fifth bar argued that maybe all these are only but maybe is different and again what's the precedence for that you find that he told them hey yeah that's an excellent argument you're actually believed he told him he went for a second opinion and he asked what's he Oh, no. You're notic. It's interesting cuz I went Yeshua and Yeshua told him that it's okay. So, he told him because I hear what you're saying. Why don't you wait until the come to Bish? Let's discuss this in a in a public forum. I want you to stand up and I want you to ask the question again. So again said no. He said I thought that I heard that you said yes. So he told him Yeshua, I want you to stand up got up and he said what should I do if I was alive and he was dead meaning knows the truth and knows that when he came to me and he asked me the question I told him it's okay I'd love to deny it now Ra but unfortunately I can't because the person I told it to was standing right here. So Rab Yeshua said you're right. I told that he's believed to say that the developed on its own. Why? Because he's a and just like has to has when it comes to is going to believe with regards to this. I know you are saying no and I know that's really what I'm supposed to say. Unfortunately, I can't retract. says the Rabb was very upset at what Rab Yeshua had done. He was upset at Rabbi Yeshua for pasing to before he came to he was upset at Rabu for pasing that it's okay [snorts] and did was when he gave Shir was the he forced Rab Yeshua to stand somewhat and it got to the point where it was so humiliating for Rab Yeshua that he's just standing there where everybody is sitting. It was a very formal setting the way people used to learn and wheel is just giving the shar and Yeshua is being exposed and the was very very disappointed. The ruler of they told who was that interesting last line of the but they told also the last they told stop talking. The way it used to be was the makir would speak and he had a somebody that would just tell over for the he had a good and he would tell for the everything that was going on. So would stop saying what is saying meaning you're embarrassing Yeshua because Yeshua is standing here. Either way there's a lot to talk about this amazingly it ties in beautifully to some really really interesting but before we do that just one and we'll finish the daf. So the Gmorrah had said in the beginning of the that is that is and that's the case. So according to according to raor should never be able to be a why is and once you're possible to be a so if that's the case so if that's the case should never be able to be a and he said I know for sure that a could be a d because the says and gave it a The truth is this idea that the were also isra you see it many many times. Let's read from this is the parish of the says [snorts] right the context is there's going to be a fight a so what do you do you go to the It's a in the right. So where do you go to? You mean you go to a rough. No the says why are you going to the you go to the if you have to bring a carbon because after it has no no here you have a court case. See clearly that the were also a few later what he means he was he didn't listen to the listen to yet you see the few pro later the But who are they standing in front of? Who's the best? And then finally you have the brought. This is the mosturish which is why the brought this. either way it's after P something that I think a lot of people don't realize and it's that role in addition to being to do the but he had another very important role he was the and that's why all these different that talk about whether it's the zak or whether it's within the parish of discuss the as being none None other than the if you take a look at the Evanzra on the PK right in the beginning of the parish of the what does it mean? So Rashi says meaning and at first glance it's a little bit because everyone knows that the came from so why does the have to emphasize over here? How many times does it say and it doesn't refer to them as the what's bothering here that take a look at Ezra Ezra says you could be a and not and that's the emphasis as it relates to This what it means is not just any but rather today's yard site he said a beautiful based on a that everybody knows the end of the over there discusses and the Rambam says So why is it that was says Levy has a very specific job. His job is to be separated to serve and to teach and to say for that reason says that's why that's separate. So what's the job of Ley? The job of is that we all know everybody knows that now everybody knows said that the truth is the history of this being Ley's job traces itself back to Ley himself the ra in the end of the first paragraph of where he talks about the history of where was the son of and And he was that and he started spreading the word says what was what do was a rabbi he was the rabbi of he was teaching everybody to that's what he did until thousands and tens of thousands of people says started gathering. What was the message that he was teaching and then he gave over the what did he did the same thing and gave over the messiah to went into the family business and he was doing the same thing. He was also being people. He was also teaching people to all his children. But the but he set aside he made him. What was his job? This was like appointed. There was a kn. We know. He gave it over to did the same thing. Gave it over to to give it over to he gave it over toy. What was Ley's job? It's one line in Ley's job was to be it was this was something that would manifest itself in Ley's descendants in Levy. That what's Ley's job not just to serve but it's just like Ley and Ley's job is it's not just to learn for themselves to spread the word it's to be people to inspire people that is the job that is the job of either way we know the next in the end of the truth is that even though this Ley's job and this is something that Ley has but it's not excl they don't have exclusive rights either way says the even though sh lady has is the messiah but they don't have exclusive rights. Any person that wants to tap in to shy has a right to do that. If that's the case, so he says it comes out that this idea, this idea that the it's related to the essence of the said if that's the case that maybe when it says in the doesn't have to be a that has from maybe it means any person that decided that he wants to be a Scottish as in it's the okay maybe for that you have to have you have to be a but as it relates to it would make sense someone that's qualified to be a to write someone somebody like that should be able to be a imagine saying the raosha fee couldn't be a po because he didn't come from shady it's it's a what does that mean who else could write truas like that's what the that's what the pusk is coming to that there's a that in the of is that there should always be that even though in you could have thought that it could be any because of like Ezra says no in this case the is emphasizing again which other could it have been it could have been that the talks about in the end of believed to say that this animal is a bakar and although it has a a know for sure that it's a good how do I know cuz I already showed it to a a ma and the m told me that it's a good m so k's believe to say that the animal he has has a a qualified mum by virtue of the fact that he already got from similar is believed to say that if he has an animal that has a that I got this from a and when he gave it to me it already had the my time what's the reason because people don't lie if there's a good chance that they're going to get caught and this is why because he's saying he got it from Israel which is Go ask did you give it to them with a not if he's lying then he's going to be exposed. People don't lie if there's a good chance they're going to be exposed. Says the we have to say is believed to say that this animal that I have I showed to that it's a why is he believed presumably the reason he's believed is because if it's not true we're going to find out it's not true. Meaning we'll find out who he claims this was that was mate. We'll ask the and he'll tell us whether he's telling the truth or not. So is our Mishna then not a to name it's not the same is talking about where a says that when I got the from the Israel it didn't have a it developed a later I showed it to the okay is with a person saying that when the gave it to me he gave it to me with a but the gumar says it's not a why because h over here what's he saying what he's saying is that he got ups that it's that It has a m. The question is what's being discussed is really not how the m was developed. But what's being discussed was whether it is a m or is not a m. In fact, says in the Mishna that even though the Mishna says a belief to say that I showed this animal with a m to a and he told me that it's okay, he's still going to have to prove that it developed on its own. It's we're questioning the actual m itself. The reason we trust him as it relates to the m is because not when it comes to the m itself. Again, it's a tricky, but this is another nuance that's important. We keep on saying the is he's to be, but he's not to eat it without the because to eat it without the is that's he's not on that. needs to be the mouth of our which is discussing not how's the develop but rather whether there's a m or there's not a says he's believed why for that there's an that he's not a but over here in's case we see the m the question is not whether there's a m or not it's not a questionable it's a question of how the developed what the client's saying is I didn't make the m by THE WAY I GOT it with a m oh now it's a question will you m for that you're for So maybe you're not so you want to tell me it's a very nice but you have no right the is discussing whether it's a not there we're more inclined to believe the because we're not to eat is discussing not is there a but how the develop there's no sh of this it's more of a question of the if you're now all of a sudden you're not allowed to eat it anymore that we had earlier on the way. So that's a different question for that arrive. You don't have as relates to this. If somebody goes up to somebody who's not someone, he was cautioners and he told him, "Do me a favor. Buy fool for me, but I want you to buy it from someone I could trust." Meaning I'm not like you. I'm a neon. I'm a father. Make sure it has that I'm okay with or at least buy it from someone that you know for sure gave my you can't trust the himself is when it comes to if I'm not I can't send that person as a for me my not name it's true he himself is a but this is so why do we say the over there there's a way to get out meaning in our well's case the case was that the is saying that I got it from this is with okay we'll find out who the is we'll find it's very objective over there it's a little bit more subjective because the person could always if you find out later that he bought it from someone that wasn't neon the could always say I thought he was neon being that it's it's a more subjective thing is pony a neon or is he not a neon right is he a good guy or a bad guy. It's subjective. Maybe somewhere in between. I don't know. So whether someone is a neon or not is is very very unclear. Whether you gave it to me with a or you didn't give it to me with a that's very black and white. So that's you'll be there. What are you going to here? You're going to that you told me to buy it from and you bought it from not and I'll tell you the guy really was an right. You can't bring any riers to the from that part of the but what's the if he told him go to in that case is believed so what do you see from there must be because it's meaning if the told go buy it from so then he's believed to say he bought it from even though ordinarily he's but you see he's believed if he told him probably cuz he's not going to violate what told him cuz now it's he was told who to go to. So if he didn't go to him he's going to be exposed. So says keep the no there it's different there it's much more because over here I told you go to obviously I want it to be from so I'm probably going to find out later if it wasn't from over here in the says that the gave okay so now ready you have to be a little bit paranoid that maybe we're going to want to know who the is and we're going to ask the is make it tasty anyone's going to take the time to do the homework to find out whether the client's telling the truth or not. So it's not such a over here where the you know for sure or there's a very very good chance he's going to follow up. So it's in this case where it's heard this what was said in the name of that is believed to say that I received this from the is with the and even though usually is when it comes to these things but this is and when it comes to we trust the person said how did know this he referred to him as Yehuda but it's to us so he said I was the one who told is shame the and told it to so I'm the origin of this and this is not being said over properly because I'm going to tell you what I told which means that's what gel should have told what did I tell not is believed to say that he got it from the but the is believed to say that he gave it to the with says For that you need for that you need for that you need he had that earlier in the week. So thear doesn't it's talking about when the gave the it was a small animal and now would already say it it grew very nicely. So I would have thought maybe the is not believed not because he's but because does he have a eye and he gave it the animal three years ago. Maybe it's not the same animal anymore. that it's okay either way. So there were two versions of this. One version was that the other version was believed is the first brought that even is believed and why is it believed? because it's had he had he gave it to when he gave it to his one day from his eyes were hurting and it was very difficult him to see this took the that now has a m because he was not a mum he brought it to rafam and he wanted a to make to know whether the mum is a mum or not He tells that gave me this with so says it was very hard for Rafam to see. So he struggled and he exerted a lot of energy but he was able to see he recognized that it was his animal. Meaning this person had been waiting to get upsakim was the the buck in M. So he wanted to go to Rafim. The problem is he knew Rafam was going to start asking him questions about how this mum developed. His story, his alibi was going to be I got it from the promise. Raf is the one who gave it to him. So how's he going to tell to Rafam? So he waited for a day like today where Rafam's eyes were hurting. So it was going to be hard for him to really notice the animal. I guess he was able to see the mum but not to have the in the actual animal. The bottom line is Rafam looked closely at the animal. He realized it was his. So heal he told him I know you have to this you're lying to me this is the animal that I gave you the postcript of the story is meaning even though the saw that it's possible for a to lie even where it's technically but said this was an anomaly no one's usually such a ordinarily you can trust a when it's a okay there was an animal that was au where one eye of the animals bigger than the other. What are you worried about? There's no doesn't matter if this person's a could be in two seconds. You can't physically make someone's eye bigger or smaller. Obviously, this is a natural. So, what's the you don't have to there's no you have no questions that you need to ask. Just tell them not so fast. Maybe the person's asking the questions. said if comes has a he wants to know if his animal has a just curious he has to give it to he walks into the he says does this have a so the is that you don't give him that he wants to hear that it has a then he's going to steal it from the kay so why is he asking the sh if he's going to steal it because if it doesn't have a m it's kum he's not getting kach then maybe he's going to steal so we don't tell him we don't pass make sure there's a kay there and right after you give him you tell now give it to the k you have to show up with your otherwise we're not going to give you up. an interesting the point is so raashi making it sound like there's no you have to there is ask him first whether or not he's a you can't give him told him over there the reason the premise of that is because we're that maybe even though he won't hence he's asking but at the same time maybe he's going to steal from But this person is you know why this is a that everybody knows anyone that was ever knows this why did he come bring me the must because he wanted to give me if he's on the he's not going to be when it comes to a real for that reason he said in this case I'm not going to be either way. Just a little bit of got laid early. But go back to the story that we had earlier where the Gumar said had the Bakar was eating from a a basket. It cut it slip and he brought it to Yeshua and he asked Yeshua, "Is it Yeshua?" said, "Yeah." He said, "Um, in terms of how the wound developed, it happened on its own." And told, listen, I know that ordinarily as a I'm not believed. I'm considered but being that I'm just like has a special status when it comes to in the laws of the laws of maybe is different as well. So gave him a he said yes it's mut it's okay but he decided to go ask well and go said it's not okay so told you're telling me it's not okay just told me it is okay he said really says yeah says you know why don't you wait until the comes comes to m and he tells stand up he stands up ask me the question you asked me earlier he gave so he turns around says anyone have an answer everyone's looking says why do you give an answer says it's not okay says really it's not okay I heard that came to you and asked you this question and you told that it is okay said listen I'll be honest with you if wasn't here I could deny it but being that here how can I be and was very upset at what happened it's not clear why but he was very upset at what happened and he embarrassed and he made stand throughout the so standing being exposed was very upset. They they were upset at for the way he was treating the great Yeshua that they told stop talking and eventually he stopped talking. This garra gets an honorable mention in a much better known gum. In fact, one of the classic gar it's the garra says a very very similar story. There was a story with he came to you have to have what says you don't have to gave him then he asked the same question he told him just listen to the words it's verbaro told get up and ask you a question again. He said, "Is there anyone here that argued?" And he looked at Yeshua, "No, no, not me." He told him, "What do you mean?" And the Gomorrah says, same exact story, different in the over here. But here the tells the rest of the story and the rest of the story is is rather long was there and they said how long are we going to allow to treat this way? He was that's a whole another he was that's today's with the and now he said enough it's time to finally remove from his post is not fit to be the nsi and they said okay so is not going to be the nsi we have to have a backup plan who's going to be the nihu maybe it should be rahu can't beu he's Dr. nicer maybe should be the says no he doesn't have he was a Ben said they said you know what the only candidate is incidentally says that you know who should have been the obvious candidate rebelz synonymous with Rabbi Yeshua right you always have together why wasn't you know why it wasn't because was old he was a springs from the WHO SAYS YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY IT WASN'T REBEL? This is Jewish history 101. Cuz rebel we know after the story with the he was put in rebel was rebel was living IN LUD. HE WASN'T even there. You want to know why he wasn't rebel? Because rebel WAS IN IT'S PARTIAL WHY HE COULD HAVE REBEL and it doesn't make any sense what must have he must have held that this story happened before the I saw from the same he says we saying it mentions And then Rabi first they ask how in the world have been mentioned before the order matters it was always in the order of so you have how be before you was the being that he was the even though he was much younger than but he comes before was also there was it could have cuz he's can't eat together with him. So if they're probing the sed with then clearly clearly rebel wasn't yet. So you see the and he wasn't yet this story the part of the story that we're about to read is when rebel becomes. So you see that it happened before the he says from this had to come up with a technicality why wasn't the one but either way says so they didn't know who should make who who should become the decide number one he was a number two he was a bunch he was the 10th generation to Ezra so they made problems was young made a nest and he developed white And he said they removed the watchmen of the base maj. What was this watchman? It was security had a policy. He said any that's not is not allowed to enter the base. It's very hard to get inh. And on that day, on that day when became the ni, he went and he removed the security guard. Meaning he removed this very intricate admissions process and he allowed everybody to come in. How many more people entered? How many says 400? Here's another number 700. Regardless, the garra says had because he realized the gal of that came that day. He ended up having a dream and they told him don't have says the gar on that dayd was taught on that day. Zarra continues and says by the way [snorts] anytime you find in the words in quotations it's referring to that day. There wasn't one that wasn't sure about that. They weren't on that day. Either way, the Gumar continues almost a whole another discussing the story. Eventually asked and as a result they brought back but they felt once became the Nazi they couldn't remove him. So he ended up with and not even three out of the four weeks would be the Nazi and one out of the four weeks rebar would be the Nazi. That's the end of the story. But there's one more line to it began with a talmid who walked in to Yeshua's madish and asked him a question and then he went to and then he was forced to ask it and that triggered this whole story. Who is the know who it was? The gar says it was who was the in that it was none other than the great and everybody's bothered. What's the significance? Why does it even matter? Like the gumar is at the very end. We don't even mention his name at the beginning. At the very it's like the po it's the last piece. There's so much rest of the story in this. IT'S NOT SH THE VERY VERY LAST thing that the of this story is. By the way, you want to know who Isa was? Isa was was so I was thinking a herish and that is is that you know if you ask somebody to tell you about the momentous moments that's a in Jewish history. So what comes to mind? You're going to think of it. You're going to think of you're going to think of harina, right? These are some of the more important the day that the yidden entered. There's some very very important times of history. I don't think is is something that anyone is going to mention on his top 10 list of most important events in Jewish history. But the truth is this was an extremely extremely important event. And I'll tell you how I I think I know that. And that's based on uh right in the beginning of the begins as follows. And the truth is this is also I'll read it from the there's going to be a day where is going to be forgotten from the says We need a guitar for this. There's going to be a day with there's going to be a hunger. Says that here's the rest of the story. So the came into the car and they said is going to be forgotten. So as a result they said we need to do something. What should we do? Let's start being and you know what they did they taught measis idas was prefaced with a with a thought of that something's wrong right now something is something is problem there's a this problem there's a hole in the foundation andra is going to be forgotten and becausera is be found we need to do something about it so what are we going to do we're GOING TO DO MAKIS NOW WHEN DID when was msakis taught WE JUST LEARNED IT HAPPENED ON that day that's The second idiot was prefaced with a herish of what's a hunger. Hunger means people push THAT STARVING TO DEATH. The war that's what a is. THERE'LL BE NO TIRE. People be starving for a little bit of tyra. You're not going to be able TO FIND TY. THAT WAS THE HERITAGE that they had. Not it wasn't there yet, but they saw it coming. They felt that. So what did they do? They taught me they started being and that's why we know that every single is because these were that they gathered they had to go ahead and they had to issue the to make sure that everything and additionally they were they removed the they said everyone's allowed to come learn because we need we need more people to learn. It can't just be can't just be people that are can't only be the biggest on him. We need people. We need people sitting and and and staging away because otherwise I see and they were married before 400 which we know means just a lot a lot a lot of people which means that 700 probably means a lot more than that. So either way there were hundreds and hundreds maybe thousands and maybe tens of thousands of of yidden that now come in and they're going to be able to to sit down and learn. And by doing that, by doing that they were able to have and they were able to avert this horrible disaster which was and again in order to really appreciate this. Yeah. When did this happen? When when this is right after the Bikto was the Bik was just destroyed, right? This is almost 2,000 years ago, [laughter] but we were literally at risk of of everything being destroyed and and and this was and this was a very very critical critical time. And the way that they were able to avert this was by being bringing people in everybody learning which culminated and that was the way that we were able to get away from you take a look at that after said there's one that was so they sit It's not possible. It can't happen. It won't happen. Who said that? He was the one who said it's not going to be forgotten. Ironically, what happened? How did the whole idias happen? How was removed? Why were they? BECAUSE ASKED THE QUESTION, IT STARTED WITH THE MOST INNOCENT QUESTION in the world. And that set a chain of events. Last was this story. Then it was and now it's this and it culminated in the chosen. Now you know why it's the chosen. It's the chosen. [laughter] And this was all triggered. Why? It was all triggered because somebody asked the question. Who was the one that asked the question? It was who said that would be the one that would trigger this as far say and that's the legacy of of you asked the man on the street who is okay I don't maybe he lit fires I don't know who So if you know a little more played a critical role in [laughter] but the truth is much more than it was after the died 24,000 and the that the world was literally it was There was no till went and he taught to five was one of those five didn't just play an important role in the of played an important role in as well was the one who said this was who felt he was the innocently asked the question which which resulted in this and making sure that wouldn't be forgotten. So just to conclude we know that we don't possibly is not like so from that standpoint the in the world of doesn't have such a because it's usually and usually when there's like but although the is not like but played an unbelievable role is the one who said and at that critical juncture was the one who came and he gave the optimism. He was the one who asked the question which resulted in the fact that 2,000 years later we're still sitting and learning. That's Rashim's legacy. It's a legacy of kilo shakara.