Bechoros 34

You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under their category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. Today's d is and we are four lines from the top of so we're in the middle of discussed a that was the doctors said that it has too much blood and as a result the is in a mat of sak what we need to do to heal this bkar is to remove sa and whether it's okay to remove D of an animal. What would be the decide not to because by being there's a good chance that you're going to give the animal and there's an issue brought three shittas. The Bryce elaborated on it and and the Bryer was really four shittas. What exactly you're supposed to do? The first was Ra said yak is done but you should make sure that you don't make a m said yak is done and it's okay if a m comes about that's going to be fine meaning you have to do that in a body part where it's impossible for there to be a m according to the you don't have to be so careful meaning don't be to be but you could be m you could be misdam wherever you want and if a m comes about then so be it the third was who said is the Gmorra said that it could be this is really in another which at first glance has absolutely positively nothing to do with the here that is the Mishna was talking about so you have we are now you have a suffic whether it's Tommy or not and there too there was a big debate amongst the Tanon whether or not you have to be careful to make sure that this truma moving forward is not going to be tough. Now ordinarily there's a to protect truma the says now everybody knows the end of that but the emphasis for today's is the beginning of the where the says Mishme is true is mashum and you see from here that it's important to watch your truma watch it from what to make sure that it doesn't become but over here the truma was anyways so the discussed do you have the of mo over here or not and there too it was three was yeah you have to protect it being that it's only a suffic maybe it's t but at the same time maybe it's tar on it side it's tar there's a mitzvah of mishuma you have an obligation to watch it rahua says no you don't have to be so careful and finally said that he said that you you could abstain you don't have to do anything and the garra somehow thought that the tan in our is in the tan and that in trum and the garra rejected that based on two premises number one in the garra had why maybe ra holds like rabishua and rahua holds like worked out all the different permutations where it's not that these two have anything to do with each other and said that it could be really the two are all based on and if they're based on then they certainly have nothing to do with each other what would be the so the first part of this what we saw in the end of yesterday's doubt was the explained why the in our would bas be based on a specifically the p that says And now we're up to the second part of this meaning that the rabbi how exactly you need to watch or do you have to watch that you have a suffic whether it's or not is really the says the we just quoted says What's the two and we have a suffic whether it's the way understands the second is maybe and the says clearly there's a a regular mitzvah to watch even where you have a suffici if you have you have to be careful. Why? Because the same mishuma you have for your regular conventional trum you have for truma truma where there's a suffic maybe it's or maybe it's really Yeshua says he told it's true the way the reads it in is which is a lian rap it sounds like the is talking about two types of trumas but the way it's written in the is true meaning if we wouldn't have this msra of how to read the word. You would for sure think that the way the word is supposed to be read is true. Meaning the of the word is true. It happens to be that the way you're supposed to read it is not true but true and there's a very big is true Yeshua told that why you assuming that the way to the way to extract the from this is based on the way it's pronounced which is will be I think from a standpoint you look at it based on the way it's written and based on the way it's written is true So it's only one truma that's you have this but as it relates to the maybe you're not going to have this says the meaning this sha between should you dion it based on the way it's pronounced or should you dash it based on the way it's written is really an age-old shila it's one of the biggest amongst the in the entire and that is or shame the messiah the mikra means am literally means mother but in this context it means primacy do we give primacy to the mikra when there's a contradiction in mash between the way the word is written and the way the word is pronounced is mikra do we go breeus do we go based on here means the way it's written some hold others hold messy at first glance it would seem that this m is over here between rebel and rebu is you hold the messiah says that's the that's the mess but if that's the case it comes out the says the is that true it says in the now the context of that is it's a little bit of a complicated and in fact as we're about to what exactly that means but the general context is a father sold his son his daughter as a which is something that he's allowed to do so she's now and that's something that he has the right to do says the whatever that means after that point he no longer has the right to sell her anymore so the question is what was it sounds a little like when he sold her he was and after that point he would no longer have a right to sell her. stating that the tan weren't exactly sure how to understand that word many I'll ask you a say in the again the significance is that after a father was quote unquote his daughter he's not allowed to sell her anymore [snorts] says you know what it means if a father would sell his daughter back in the day as an of the yid that bought his daughter had a mitzvah to marry this girl it was what's known as ye him his son, but there was a mitzvah of him to marry her. In the event that he would marry her, at that point, if she then later got divorced, the father would no longer have a right to sell her cuz that once a man's daughter who's a gets married, the father doesn't have a shuss anymore to sell her. And the truth is that if a father would marry off his daughter, not in the context of selling her and then the one that bought her did. But generally a father marries off his daughter, that's a that's something that the Torah gives him a right to do. At that point, he wouldn't have a right to sell her anymore. And it's worked out from the word. Where do you see marriage? Big is a euphemis. That's is at that point he's not allowed to sell her anymore. It says no big over here has nothing to do with marriage. But you know what big over here means? It's he rebelled in her. He violated his trust in his daughter. He went ahead and he sold her. And it's once a father sells his daughter into a marriage. Didn't have to be yield. And if a father would marry off his daughter, he wouldn't have this. It's not totally in begged marriage but it's totally in the fact that he went ahead and sold her. Now the garra doesn't explain but Rashi quotes where the gumar says what's the hes between why begot and why did mash bo says the rabika holds and in the world of mikra big works better with rabza holds and big works better But regardless what comes out from that is the ra how could you tell me this that says that there's a mitzvah to watch even that you have a it's a true it's true that is true is true and is that he holds Then how in our could say it should be true and the is persuaded by this argument you're right you can't say that the husband is true what then is the holds that there's a mitzvah of is true but think about it logically why is there a mitzvah to watch your true to make sure it doesn't become here it might be so that it might be Tommy anyways. So why do you have to watch something from becoming if it anyways might be Tommy right? only maybe but then again it might be but the point is what the is trying to say is you're right is not but it also has nothing to do with our mission has nothing to do with it has nothing to do with you that is like which so the truth is there were two shims right in the beginning of the there was in the in the said regarding the was the last line of you're allowed to be even if it means that you're going to make a mo. Now the truth is that was the sheet of the in the meaning they're not telling you go and make a but you could be makdam even in a place where there may be a and no worries you don't have to worry that maybe there's going to be a it doesn't bother me but in the bright added one piece said and that was something that didn't agree with said let's say you to save the life of this you did it in a says you're allowed even say you're allowed to do that and now there was a Worst case scenario the you were trying to avoid happened. Could I eat this now? Like I can eat a anywhere I want or not said no said that's going to be okay. In other words saying two there's in the said in the is that you can be even in a place where you may make a then that's the then there's another thing said in the he didn't say in the he said it in the which is something didn't agree with and that is in the event that you made a you're allowed to eat it if you descend the name of meaning is doesn't mean says what's in the we never spoke this out. Why does say in the you can be done wherever you want. You may be say so being that you're not having to make and it's not apparently. So it's only but if that's the case that's what the thinks then why did have to say we know holds but we have two who said already that why do I need to tell me that in the base This is who holds we know holds like that. So you have to say that when walked into and he said to tell you like he was telling something they didn't know it's true they knew that that held like but they didn't realize this even like the what's the even if you accidentally are you're still going to be able to eat it in contrast to that say that in the event that you're you can't eat So the first this is ex before we go there we have over here the and the truth is that this sug is something that comes up a lot and I think it's kadai to just mention one two But the first we've spoken about and that is the init the context over there is and we've spoken about this now it's just that the means of the who says that even though the 613 is but the said that that is not why he says that in order to write the you have to write a crossra If somebody would hire a he would sit down by himself, write a and say would be a possible he wouldn't be the mitzvah. You're only if it's a based on that over there says why would because they used to count the letters in the used to say the letter V in the word in it's the midway point of all the of the if you count all the letters in the midway point is the letter of the word says we're saying that the word the letter V of the word is the midway point of all the letters in the that VV itself which half is it is it the last letter of the first half or is it the first letter of the second half? Why don't we bring a and why don't we count it there's precedence for that says the it's not going to work. You know why? Because [snorts] in once upon a time people knew precisely the letters of the they knew which word is supposed to be which is supposed to be and as a result there was uh they understood the exact letters of the it was possible to go ahead and count. They say we're not that we don't know all the letters in the we there's no way for us to go ahead. So we're wasting our time. We can count, we could try, but it's not going to it doesn't make sense because at the end of the day, we're not in it says the Raman says that if you write a and you mess up on one of the init says in that in the times of already they didn't know the we certainly don't know the if that's the case it's impossible to write It cost you to say it says even though it's one of the mitzvah in the but it's not a says that he has a very big problem with this says how could it be he says we know we have in everything and certainly when it comes to how to do a mitzvah there's no mitzvah in the we don't know how to do every mitzvah that's relevant okay maybe mitz that are related to the we have a mdash but anything [laughter] that's something that we physically could do we know how to do we forgot which came with a very expensive invoice it came at the expense of not knowing how to write a says I have a very big problem with that he says it's clear in the times of the they were extremely proficient in because you find throughout what does that mean we're going to be the way it's written sometimes it's written sometimes it's written and that's the says we don't care how it's written it says says don't interest me. What matters from a standpoint is the way it's pronounced. But if there's so many that come from what that come from. So that's the case that it's clear in the times of the they knew these hence the why was it forgotten. How in the world is it possible that this was forgotten? because of this is a very big he says must be there's two of there's two types of thiser where it impacts the word or at the very least the you' be able to extract from the word and then where it has no impact on the world. So for example, whether it should be makes a difference. It makes a difference in the in the how many walls has to have even though it's pronounced regardless of whether it's written with but it makes it makes a difference. That type of there's no way anybody forgot says which that's referring to has no impact on the word. For example, the wordar could bear could be or it could be with there's no in the world that you can anyways from the word is the name of so what are you going to take from the word that has no bearing in those could be the never knew those we didn't need the for because those don't have any impact on when the says that that's missing one of the it's going to be possible that's if it's missing one of the impacts but if it doesn't impact it doesn't matter so true says that's the don't impact being that they don't impact they there was no on it was forgotten unfortunately and as a result they couldn't count the letters you didn't know if the was there or here because we we don't have the whole of all the but as relates to the that you need to be able to write a we have and if we have those and because of this argues because of this argues with and he says there is a mitzvah even to go ahead and write a safety just to end with one and that is that the Mishna says in that said. So almost everything in this mission is pretty famous, right? This is 101 and that everybody heard me. What does that mean? What does it means? So if you take a look at Rabenu in his office and the truth is it's already inurish and all says means that are critical. They're crucial. They literally protect the Tyra. We need the via without the via there's going to be some breach in the of the soyus again. Meaning the word is like the word. What does mean? They have to know not just how the word is pronounced makes no difference in the world of it matters in the so I think this is very interesting you know why because who said this again this is the week of is the is the one that said it in our we just had a between and holds Rebel holds right the thought first that the rebel that you have to watch. There's a mitzvah of Mishme by Truma that's a suffic maybe because it says but the says not true because we have holds and it's over there that holds and the truth is it's but it's really says We have a list of who held and one of those right here is the one that said it's just a little bit of food for thought. Either way, If somebody made a in his who received a he has to take it to the bring it as a garbage if it would develop a then he'd be able to eat it wherever he wants this by himself went and was terrible thing he was the question is now what says We give this and we tell them you're never allowed to sh this animal even though it has a doesn't matter. You can never sh this. It's true. right now based on this M we're never going to allow you to sh but forever if it develops a different M then based on the other M that it developed at that point you would be able to shar the was then not only can't you benefit from the m that you were mal but you won't even be able to benefit it develops another M that's a serious according to no this one no but if it develops another Is this consistent with other meaning sounds like rebel is that when we make a class we're not only going to make a class on this specific thing but the says well I'll ask you somebody had a cut off says he's going to be taught if however he did it then let's say he went ahead and he removed says if he did it so the is he remains even though he removed the however if he develops a new at that point he'll become from the first nega the is going to explain all this say no that even if he develops another nega he still remains to unless one of two things happen either this nega spreads throughout his body or if the original before he cut it off was smaller than a gra. So what's going on? If somebody has a baharis, someone has a nega he's says in the you're not allowed to remove a baharis and is the lion of so it says in the you're not allowed to remove a one of the is if a child is born and there's a bahis on his and the question is could you do the mitzvah of milo and not do the mitzvah of memor says you could do the mitzvah of removing a and that's one of the to the concept concept of an but either way there's an isser to remove a baharis. Now if somebody removed the bahus or the baharis was removed by itself the person's taught how could he be talking there's no bahis anymore now if a person has not supposed to remove it you're supposed to follow the steps go to a he's the proverbial doctor for this particular and as a result you wait for whatever the says he's a what the outs that's what you're supposed to do but of course of course it's common sense if the is not there the person's going to be taught and that's really what this mission is saying the question is what if you didn't you removing the you didn't go to the now why so you don't have it to the source of the to you don't have the bahas however there's going to be an issue what's the says you remain to despite the fact there's no to there's no source you don't have the bahar until you develop a new baharis when you develop a new baharis at that point you get a bit you develop a Harris as soon as that happens you become tar for the second one then you'll be tired from the first one as well cuz the assumption is that the of the second one would have anyways been matar you from the first one although the can have another in what revels but that would be the so therefore you're going to be okay the say no that once you remove a bahas your forever the is that even if you develop a second bahas and you become from the second bah it's not going to undo you there is a way out but that's we don't need that for right now but the point is as it relates to the said you're only going to remain until you develop a new according to you're going to remain forever what's in our rebar we don't say that when it develops a new then it anyways would have been so now it's going to be okay once you did something wrong it's going to be a problem forever when it comes comes to removing we say is that you're only going to remain but once you develop a new and you become from it at that point anyways would have been so then we say I don't care anymore about the original doesn't it seem to be a steel is or is it not you have to say between the mission is talking about the money his animal the is talking about the person's body there must be a difference between way views when it comes to your verse when it comes to your go what's the really has nothing to do with m says when it comes to m over there you could say that the reason of felt we have to give you a forever is because he felt if he wouldn't do that there was a risk that a person would try to be maach the reason is he would feel what's his downside I'm gonna be mumach hopefully that means I'll be able to eat myar right now obviously this is not a good guy because he's doing something he's not allowed to do but we're worried about this person so he's going to go and he's going to be mum in his thinking that he could eat it now what's the worst case scenario they're going to tell him sorry it doesn't work what then do I need to do wait until he gets another m he's not worse off than he was previously Had he not been mum, he was in a situation where he has to wait until a mum develops. He doesn't want to bring it as a carpent clearly. So he has to wait until it develops a mum. He'll try to be mum. If it doesn't work, you're going to tell him wait until it develops a mum. So he lost nothing by making his attempt to try to be mum. So as I said, what kind of kass is that? Kass means you have to disincentivize somebody. You have to give him some risk. You have to tell them you want to do this. Listen, just do it at your own risk because if we catch you, this is what's going to what's going to happen. I'm going to be back at step one. risk means that I'm going to lose. He has nothing to lose because if you tell him what the are telling him is that if you're mum, you can't use it. Wait until it develops. Okay. So, I'm back at square one. Nothing changed. So, therefore, Reza felt you need we need to disincentivize him. Give him some real downside from being mum. And the way we do that is by telling him that if you're mum and we find out, you're never going to be able to sh this. Now, the person's going to have to look both ways before he crosses the street, right? before he does this cuz he understands that he's really assuming some risk but he but when it comes to your go could you say that a person can't control the nega on his go I mean that he can't control the nega go so if you tell a person that if you remove the nega you're going to be taught me until you develop another nega this person has a problem because maybe he'll never develop another nega that's enough of a of an incentive or a disincentive to make sure that he's not going to go ahead and do it either way that was what rabbis said to be mash this apparent contradiction inzah's more of when it comes to imposing do you make the or do you not make the comment he said it's a very nice terra we had in the as well because say just the opposite the Mishna said that as it relates to someone being the is until it develops a new and when it comes to the bahes say he's going to be to forever if he removes the which is so how you going to answer the terrorist to the rebel is what we just said very nice in our mission what did the person do wrong he was that was He was mum. He wasn't supposed to be mum. He went ahead and he was mum. So what are we going to do? The rabbon say the way I view the class the gather of the class is that that act of being mum we take away from him. Meaning even though mum is something that should be m an animal being that it was done is that you can't benefit from being okay. So the but if develops another one there's no reason it shouldn't be. That's why they're abundant. Our mission say there's no forever [snorts] in our the we do the same thing. We say that what you did wrong you can have a benefit from. What did this person do wrong? He removed the objective was to become by removing the said that is over. If that if you can never benefit from that you're going to be forever because if you can't benefit from that you're always going to have to view it as if that nega is there. So really in the it's a more lumpish it's a little bit more practical. It's all about incentives and disincentives and and costbenefit analysis and riskreward uh ratios. But as it relates to the it's more lundus it's more together of the is that here you so we take away the benefit of the mum. Okay. So this I can't benefit from another m I could benefit from over here. What was the ver what did I do wrong? I removed the negat. We take away the act of removing the nega. That means the nega is always going to be here. If the nega is always going to be here and really it's not here, so you can't remove it, but you have to make believe that it's here. So it's back in the envelope arithmetic. You're just going to be telling me forever there's no way around it. So that if somebody removes he's not forever wasn't sure what the right gift was. Is it or is it vig? What's the difference? Just push it. Sounds like as soon as he develops another nega, he's going to be vig sounds like when he develops another nega and becomes from the other nega then will be from the original as well. Says, what difference does it make? Meaning he's not going to be until he becomes from the new nega. The question is does he have two or one nega? Meaning if the only way the person can be from the first neg is when he develops another nega when he develops another negate. So it doesn't matter if he becomes tired from the first nega when he becomes tired from the second nega or when he just develops the second nega at the end of the day he's going to be because he'll be the second. So what difference does it make this we wait till he finishes before we inspect the naga and this is based on we'll see this soon in the raid this is based on that the only time a person becomes a whether it's a bias is if a co says that he is a but if a co doesn't that this nega is a nega Yeah, he doesn't even you can't self diagnose yourself when it comes to you have to hear it from a doctor and a a coen and unless the coen says that this is an issue is it's not considered a nega and for that reason we have a little leeway when it comes to maybe letting a person who might have not know yet that he has an it's during his it's during his so we don't want to so we say we'll wait until after and then you make an appointment and the doctor the in this case is going to decide. He's going to determine what exactly is going on. same is true for his if someone has a questionable he doesn't go to the says if he has if somebody had a nega he removed it he becomes until he develops a new but as soon as he develops a new he becomes from the original nega the naturally So what happens if when he developed the second nega was oh when he developed the second nega he was a second nega he's going to bear because we don't make somebody during his or during yontiff but at the same time he had a new nega and be that he had a nega that's enough in's world to remove the and to be matim from the original nega it's going to come at his but is that he's going to remain from the original nega until he becomes from the second being that he never became from the second. So you don't have the he's still going to be from the original. What's the again? What's the is we're talking about someone that had a nega he removed it. He was the of removing a nega. Then he developed a new nega. But when he developed a new nega it was either yont or he was a and it was during his. The question is according to accord this person is anyways to me forever. But according to rebel who says that when the person develops the second he becomes we remove the of the mas the original one in this instance would he be or would he not be? It's up to you. What happens if somebody made a m in his and then the person died said to the extent of the but that's for sure that there's a question this in this case when the person died does do the children or do they not yash the when the father owned this wasn't allowed to eat it now the father's not alive anymore the father is the one that did the air so maybe the children shouldn't be bound by this kass says I'll show you some precedent from this different places in where you find such a an idea where father doesn't have a and we either do or do not say that the children are going to first example is if somebody sells his kani to a nonjew so anani is mitzvah like for that reason if you sell anani to a nonj disappointed at you because you're taking a person on some level and you're putting him in an environment where it's going to be very challenging for him to keep says for that reason we cancel even his children meaning we we gave him a what was the it's a gin the says you have to buy the ever back up to 10 times its value you have to overpay ridiculously to bring him back into a if the father sold his eid to a non-Jew and then he died. We forced the children to do the same thing. Now children didn't sell them, the father sold them. There you see clearly the children but says there's a to say that because every day that this is in the non-Jews house something bad is happening. So being that the outcome the is something that survives the father's death, it makes sense then that we should carry over the onto the children. So that's not a good sush because in our case there's no in our case the father made the nothing bad's happening now the bad thing happened already. So who said the children should have the ins if somebody makes up he sets his appointments on so he should go ahead and do work then impose the and we don't allow you to do the work even if it means you're going to lose money which is usually a hector to do on but at the same time if you make appointments so to speak for your work to be done on in that case we go ahead and we make a what happens if somebody was to do and then he died and now the children do they have to take this financial loss really there's ways to go do the work or do something and like this you won't have to take the loss now the father we made but the father's not alive anymore we're handling the children anyways say yes or no we don't but there says of there was no ever done what was the at the end of the day the person had in mind to do nothing bad happened being that nothing bad happened why cancel the the children right children didn't do anything wrong and the father also never really did anything but over here the father was not the over here the children should crux of the question was the onra and if that's the case not alive anymore or was the on the was on you say the is still around somebody was doing work in his field now work but what he did was was the end of the year he knew in the beginning of the he's going to be able to start plowing so he thought he's going to clean up his field from a whole year like this he's going to prepare it for the work that he has to do is if all he did was clean it no we don't care so much we let him do work and he died it let's say he did real work he fertilized it says he did a type of work. We give him a class that what happens if a person prepared it in the way and then he died. We don't impose the class on the children. You see from the this thinks is direct to and you see from the impos they imposed it on the imposs if someone's mama is somebody else's. So ordinarily if somebody's mazic somebody else there's a concept of yusha where a person doesn't just yin assets he's liabilities as well. So in this case if the father was a mazik the children would potentially have a to pay their father's but if the was he was like why not because if someone's it's not a because it's even though it's only so comes out it's brave like and this is that all were imposed not as if the person dies and now we're handling the children in that case there's not going to be a so just to conclude with oneasha from the from the from the it's in the beginning of we mentioned that So if it's and somebody has a shy might have an really looks like a nega you don't go to the you don't go to the if he sees it will not tell you that it's a because on a cen doesn't and the same is true as it relates to he's not going to tell the person that he has this which is brought very right here in Ara is brought a little bit more in the moment there is discussing this everybody knows that the only time a person could become through a said he's the diagnosis is what creates the that's what makes it that's what makes this person Tommy says the name of the says how do you know that learn it says says you know the that determines he creates the reality of it's because you see from this if it's or it's he doesn't what he mean doesn't become either he has a neg he doesn't have a neg what does that mean because it's during his or because it's you see from here that it's Only an egg of a coin says so. And there's a coin not saying so. But the point is this is good for the more it says. We spoke about this many times before the would determine that. And he would tell the he says remove everything from the house and then I'm going to ask it. Why? Because once the past is everything in the house is going to become. So the would say first remove everything even the saw this is one of the he would say remove everything from the house and then have but what do you see from here again because if it's not what do you mean if the house is to then everything that's in the houses anyway is going to be so you see that so said is from or someone that had a said it's learned from says There's going to be a tremendous going to be if let's say wants to delay the sack the diagnosis of the nega for something frivolous for according to that you see that even to save somebody's money will delay it now the over there is referring to the nega of a bias Rebi stole that to as well which is incidentally. So you see that even for rebi was of the opinion that even for something like saving we're willing to push it off was talking about he's TALKING ABOUT HE'S TALKING ABOUT so for dare you see an idea of pushing it off. They both have a mar that it's totally in the question said or the would be could a push it off deliberately for advir but that said that that's also the see that even by you can push it off for advirud that's so that's could be you're not going to have oh the he on But before the kash a little bit of a we're all familiar with the mini of so after seven days is the first day but the seven days of now the truth is that the word doesn't mean seven days of parties means seven those you say even under the it's the talks about in the come before the storm right before so it's the last in the in the first bar. But regardless the really means the you say under but the Gmorrah says that seven days you have an obligation to go ahead and to make say so we you we mistakenly it's not a mistake it's just a little bit of a misnomer we refer to the seven sudo or the seven days as the seven brahas where really the seven bras are not related so much that you have the seven brahas Again, everybody knows this. It's what does that mean? The only criteria is that the girl has to be. If the girl is not a basul, there's no What if the girl's not a If he's a even if she's but regardless of what we know as the to that is not only under but is for what the Gar doesn't say is what the is to this it's not pos so what's the to the Shami says that moherenu was seven days of aos and moherenu was the raam in the beginning raam isos and the ra the beginning brings the he's discussing and he mentions that is seven days and then at the end of so ironically when does the ram bring or It brings in the first. So discussing says that aos is seven that aos is seven days. He says and not only is seven days but there's a that after somebody gets married as well. And what's the mccard to it? He says the quoting this year that it was So the rabb's quoting this is it was that there was that meaning was something go tell any that's almost by definition what a rice is so that was that is a rice What about a tako made a ton? It doesn't sound like this was part of it. Sounds like made a taken of you make takas, right? Will sometimes make takas throughout the abundance rices and things. These were takas and had a mel. So made a ton. Is that like any other takana where the takana is going to be marin because it's merely a tak of an of the man of an or maybe mosh is different being that the moenues. So maybe are going to be thus as well. Listen to the listen and say for the says any that any one of the he says I'll prove it to you was he was also messing says comes out that we find throughout that and we find it brings us to doesn't matter but what's the So what does mean? He means anything that any nabi did after mohereno is uh meaning after because world is after everything is only going to be but that moenu himself also made maybe would also be or the way it's a little bit more mash that a ton of raenu is also going to be it's But is really going to be is a little bit of this is maybe going to be stating that the init and this is in just one excerpt you have a Frank so it's talking about and he throws in even made is going to be he says I know that's you know I know that because I know for a fact that is because everyone knows when it comes to how if it's a must of but the point is it says that the even the even that is also going to be but the point is a ton of do we look at it as a or do we look at it as a now the truth is there's many of this is not the only one the first of he didn't got the money he said even but the is only so maybe but the point is is as it relates to our if you hold that as then it should come out that is only going to be but if this in the mitzvah is a that it's mash only the takos of but any tako of really has a dinner that would come out that really should be a mitzvah. Now the truth is when it comes to this sha we have a over here it's totally how you look at on the one hand is the but then again his may view differently maybe they're viewed as a and we have a little smack to that from a and say but the mock is really a rash the rash is in the first peric of it's inis it's of and he brings from who said the first day of meaning the first day of someone gets married. So when this is that next day is going to be why because it says but everything that happens after that that's already not going to be what's he referring to. So of course he means the granted is not entirely we're talking about a crown that mother made for him and the name is and what does it say? So it sounds like that bottom line is we have and we have a that was that the first day brings it for that's going to be as it relates to only the if that's the case said learns that the is from What's the regular day? What's the during andor said that had a different said what's the between the two or according to that has to be a mitzvah. So if that's the case says the reading the seems to say that if it's the fourth day and a person has a he goes to the I'm not going to look you know why because you have a mitzvah RIGHT NOW AND IF YOU have the so you can say that when the said but if you're going to tell me that is not there's no way the meant because it's not even a mitzvah that's but not avail Yeshua if only that's my and says then it's a rush and he has such a hard time with this just tell you very quickly the has a fest he says that even if the r and every he brings everyone's working with the rush that is only but that's pos has a car in after Yakov works for and then gets fooled by so what happens he ends up marrying Leia and he says what's going on over here I thought I was marrying so says you know what don't worry about it says wait a week and then afterwards you'll get why wait a week says in fact says this is the brings a different this is the he had to wait you see the says The car doesn't mean it's a mitzvah but Chevro has a mar in the Tyra and being that Chevro has a Tyra it's a a do that has a it's like a says the Kan that's starts playing Kasha we'll pick this up another