Bechoros 30

You probably know Reb Sruly Bornstein from the Daf. Now, Reb Sruly brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Hamisha Chumshei Torah. Don't just learn Chumash, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under the Chumash Your Category on the Lakewood Daf Yomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. >> Today's Daf is Bechoros Daf Lamed. And we are at the Mishnah, eight lines from the top of Daf Lamed Amud Aleph. So, we're moving along in the fourth perek of Maseches Bechoros, the middle of a digression discussing halachos related to somebody that's a chashud. Why are we in this digression? Because the Mishnah had discussed a chashud al Bechoros, which is very much the topic of the Masechta. From there we digressed to talk about different people that are chashud in different areas of halacha. And that note, talk to Mishnah. A chashud al lashvi'is, if somebody is a chashud in dinei shvi'is, ein chashud al ama'asros. It doesn't make him a chashud as relates to ma'asros. A chashud al ama'asros, if somebody is chashud that he violates the laws of ma'asros, ein chashud al lashvi'is. It doesn't make him a chashud on the laws of shvi'is, shmita. A chashud al zeh v'al zeh, if somebody is chashud both on the laws of shvi'is and on the laws of ma'asros, chashud al hataharos, he will be considered to be a chashud as it relates to chulin [snorts] betaharos. The issue of who chashud al hataharos. However, somebody that is chashud as it relates to eating chulin betaharos, ein chashud al zeh v'al zeh. He will not be considered a chashud as it relates to the laws of shvi'is and as it relates to the laws of ma'asros. Zeh achal, says the Mishnah. As it relates to a chashud, so obviously it means that we don't trust them. But in addition to that, it also means that a chashud al davar, if somebody is chashud on something, idono'i, he's not going to be a judge or a jury as it relates to that area of halacha. Additionally, he's going to be passul. So, another Mishna as it relates to the laws of chashud, and we're straddling three types of chashudim. Someone that's chashud on shvi'is, someone that's chashud on ma'asros, and someone that's chashud on taharos. A chashud on shvi'is means he's not careful to observe the laws of shmita. A chashud on ma'asros means he's not careful to be mafreesh trumos uma'asros. And a chashud on taharos means he's not careful to eat his chulin betaharah. Once upon a time, there were people that ate chulin betaharah. You're not obligated mid'oraisa to do so, but there were people that did, and a chashud al taharos is someone who's chashud. We don't trust that he's careful as it relates to eating his chulin betaharah. What was the halacha of the Mishna? So, the Mishna said, if someone is chashud in hilchos shvi'is, could be he's a tzaddik as it relates to ma'asros. So, in hilchos al ma'asros, if someone's chashud on the laws of ma'asros, maybe he's a gadol hador as it relates to the laws of shvi'is, and as a result, in hilchos al shvi'is. Stating that if somebody is chashud al zeh al zeh, and by the way, chashud al zeh al zeh doesn't mean he's chashud on both. It means even he's chashud on one of the two. So, if someone's either a chashud al al shvi'is or he's chashud al al ma'asros, then he's going to be chashud al taharos. He will be a chashud al taharos. And the reason is because shvi'is and ma'asros are both dinei d'oraisa. To [snorts] eat chulin betaharah is a din derabanan, and if someone is chashud on a d'oraisa, it's going to make him for sure be chashud al derabanan. Meaning, if someone's chashud on one d'oraisa lav dafka he's going to be chashud on the other d'oraisa. But if someone's chashud on a d'oraisa, for sure he's going to be chashud al derabanan. And really, that's the hem sugar of the next part of the mission that if somebody's Kushner if somebody is Kushner to not be miserable being that all it is is a dinner upon and therefore in a Kushner he's not going to be Kushner [snorts] as it relates to either or masters because it could be the dinner upon and it's something that he's Kushner on but as it relates to the dinner that he's going to be more careful he's going to be more miserable and it's for that reason for that he's not going to be Kushner one dick talk just in the language of the mission the mission said the Asia who Kushner Tyro family Kushner the way we explain the mission the Asia right the Asia sounds like just grammar there is a person who's Kushner entire that is not Kushner on the masters anyone that's Kushner on Tyro is not Kushner on masters and on Schwarz the explain that [snorts] true but it's only with regards to cool in the Tyro but if you have a person that's Kushner on true Tyro Kushner those are dinner day riser and then for sure you wouldn't just say that because he's only a Kushner Tyro therefore he's going to be in a Kushner then it could be the already going to be different and it's for that reason we have this sort of ocean the Asia someone who's Kushner Tyro we just want to you to understand we only mean the cool in the Tyro which is what the mission means but this is an extra word in a mission is not so common but it's coming most I got working for us to understand it's only with regards to cool in the Tyro if however wasn't cool in the Tyro it wouldn't necessarily be this way so again just to set up the Gamora what's the basic feel of the mission the basic feel of the mission is if someone is Kushner in one area of Halacha doesn't necessarily make him a Kushner in another area of Halacha so Schwarz and masters six of one half a dozen of another they feel very very similar in nature. And there were people that were they weren't and there were people that were they didn't keep the laws of but just because somebody is for one, it doesn't necessarily make him for the other. Stating that if somebody is >> [snorts] >> for a he will be considered a a and it goes without saying that if someone's only a on a then he won't be a so again on one doesn't make you a on a another but being on a does make you a of the what about someone's that's possible if a on a doesn't make you a on a so certainly a on a is not going to make you a day but a little nuancey but it's going to walk us into the first half of today's stuff. Says the tomorrow my time what's the reason that if somebody is on he's not on or why is it that if someone's on he's not on but the mission of first set a and only afterwards set a on a so the first part of the uh naturally is it's following the first line of the mission so again the opening line of the mission was a the says why not meaning logically the thinks that if you're not careful in so why would be any different you know the the I can hear you but these are both they're on the same level so if that's the case why would you think it's different so the says I'll tell you why it's all related to the psyche of the person has nothing to do with it doesn't require the of my however as it relates to my give on the which my requires It's a shame it only be eaten within the homer of Jerusalem. Homer lay in people's minds they see it as homer. So you could have a guy who's kosher al achshavish, but in his mind he came up with a krum svara to say that yeah, shvi'is has nothing to do with homer Jerusalem. There I'm happy to not be so careful. Call me a kosher. But as it relates to ma'aser sheini, in his mind he thinks that's way more homer and that's the Indian of a kosher al achshavish and a kosher al ma'aser. Kosher al ma'aser or in a kosher al achshavish. Next line of the mishna my time is up again. What's the reason for that? Ma'aser is like pidyon because ma'aser again ma'aser sheini is subject to pidyon. If somebody wants to be paid to ma'aser sheini you can't. Shvi'is however given the komitz rule lay, but as it relates to shvi'is even though there's a concept of shvi'is but at the same time some of the isur is going to be maintained and therefore the less like pidyon it doesn't have a proper pidyon. Homer lay again in this person's mind it's considered more homer. Meaning just like you can come up with a svara why a person might think ma'aser is more homer than shvi'is you could also come up with a reverse svara why a person might think that shvi'is is more homer than ma'aser. This is all the psychology of the person. It's for that reason you can never say that because a person is a kosher al achshavish he's a kosher al ma'aser because maybe ma'aser is homer lay because it requires a homer. And you also can't say that if a person is kosher al ma'aser he should be kosher al achshavish because you could always say maybe shvi'is is homer lay because it doesn't have that same level of pidyon that ma'aser sheini does. It's for that reason a kosher al achshavish and a kosher al ma'aser a kosher al ma'aser and a kosher al achshavish. And just to be clear about one thing these svaras that we're suggesting right now no one's saying these are real svaras. No one's saying they're even rational svaras. But at the same time these are things that people sometimes will think up and it's for that reason as it relates to defining whether this person is a kosher or not a kosher that's all trying to krich into this person's mind. So being that these are thinkable svaras therefore they're presented in our Sugya, but you can ask a kasha on this swara. That's not the point. The point is that we're trying to define the psychology of the person. The Mishna continued and the Mishna said, "A Zeh al Zeh. If somebody is on shvi'is or we said ma'aseros, then the halacha becomes on tithes." What's the reason? So, the Mishna is very partial like we spoke. Give me the day right? So, being that he's a day riser, he cannot be a for sure he's going to be a here you can't come up with swaras. If someone's a day riser, full stop. It means he's a on and then finally the Mishna said, "The age of tithes." There's a concept of being on tithes, but at the same time you're not going to be not on shvi'is and not on ma'aseros. Says the Gemara again, very simple. All this swaras we already spoke of. Even though this person is on tithes, meaning tithes, that's only a on. The on the on, but why shouldn't he be on the on? Great Gemara kasha, very many. This kasha is on the last halacha of the Mishna. The on the on on the on the on the on. And the the swara is very logical. He's to not be the school of that doesn't make him a for on the on. The on the on. I don't listen to the rabbis. But, just cuz you don't listen to your local rabbi doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to violate in the on. And and are the on and it's for that reason it doesn't make you a on. But, the Gemara says as logical as it is, I'll be a kasha from a on. The on says on the on. Someone that is a on. Neman is the opposite of someone that's a on the on. Neman on the on. He's also considered a on the on. And what's the on? The on. It sounds like if he's a on the on, on. He's a on the on. Someone that's a on the on is a on the on. But, if you're not on the on, sounds like you're going to be on the on. It's a flat out head on collision with our Mishna. So, the Gemara is going to give two on. The first is on the on. Rabbi said, "Must listen to going should be on the on the on." The Mishnah is talking about a very specific when the Mishnah says that somebody that's kosher on Tyra's it doesn't necessarily make him a kosher on schmeta maisers. It's talking about not in a regular case. Mishnah doesn't mean what we thought it meant. Mishnah doesn't mean what we thought. We thought that's a very simple swap. He had the rabona kosher the rice the kosher. That's far as is not a good swap. The Mishnah is talking about where we saw this person be no good in a schveez and in a but in a now that we see him be no good we saw him do a when nobody was looking. So as far as we know this is real. This is very very legit. But here's the point. The point is is that if we don't know for sure that this person was ever no good in a a >> [snorts] >> schveez and maisers but in a just be the fact that he's kosher on a Tyra's would make him a kosher on on schmeta and a maisers. In other words, what Rabbi is saying is that the is really not what the Mishnah says. The is what the says and that is never never kosher kosher. Kosher. >> [snorts] >> I the Mishnah Mishnah is talking about a no good the no good is when we saw him be no good but in a but you want to know what the past this is if someone's kosher on a Tyra's he is a kosher on schveez and maisers. The more I said my time a whole swap he had the rabona kosher the rice the kosher. In light of this Rabbi says that's far as a failed attempt. It it sounded good until for a minute. But because it is still we have no choice but to say that no once a person's kosher on this engine he's going to be kosher and the Mishnah that says not is talking about a very specific case. Rabbi Rabbi he said just the opposite. He said that the like our Mishnah. That if someone's kosher on Tyra's he's not going to be kosher on schveez and a maisers. And for the reason that we gave a very simple, logical reason. Yeah, the rabbinical and the risalah I if that's the case, what is the price to mean when it says only someone that's never on tires is never on it sounds like a the total that we're going to make is going to be in the price going to have a with your vice talking about very very nuanced that came to with this person was once on both. Meaning you had a person that was on tires and let's it was on so it was on my sister was a camera upon it. And then you came to the rabbis the to buy you and he was no couple I'm going to do better he did his proverbial truth so like this he's no longer going to be a the other issue that had me now you and then afterwards he became a on one of them which one on the tires right because that's what the price is talking about the mean and then we say me with the question on me that if he was a on the tires what is that that's a that the whole couple was not a couple of side the couple on the tires and side the couple on the and the meaning of other person that we don't know was ever a on or all we know is that it was a tires that doesn't make you a on or because he had the other but if you have a situation you know the person for sure was once a and now we became always well if you know he was also on and we was on the and on and on tires and he became always on the on the tires so now there's already a sir on the couple that he made on the the and the and and being that he was a once a on that now we're going to say how to do you know we're going to reinstate his status as being a in other words we have a a steer with regards to the last of the mission the question on the tires and the question on the and the and the question in a vacuum is that a true statement or is that a is that not a true statement on the one hand it sounds like I mean if the mission says that it should be a true statement But the problem is I have a bris and never on tires never on the and from that it would seem to apply with a exactly how to reconcile this. Is the the lotion of the bris and we're going to make an on the mission. That was the first I'm a rabbi boy or is the like the lotion of the mission we're going to make an the bris. That was the second in the rabbi >> [snorts] >> the rabbi small either way. Going back to the part of the mission. The opening line of the mission. A in the a in a a in a says the I'm a rabbi bar I'm a rabbi bar one of the great >> [snorts] >> of the great rabbi said over the name of his rabbi is the mission that said that someone that's is a in a the very very first line of the mission. That is the opinion of rabbi is who's rabbi is also knows rabbi why is rabbi referred to as rabbi we actually just mentioned that a couple of ago and that is because the mission is a mayor of the rabbi but the bottom line is said I'm a rabbi bar the name of the rabbi the mission is the rabbi of the they hold that is someone's he's 100% going to be a says who are these that hold that a is so the says who the rabbi was referring to is rabbi the great time of the rabbi the of the rabbi and the reason rabbi would hold that way is because the rabbi starts coming everybody held that was very very so if there's a person who's in for sure for sure he's going to be a a because in as much as you know we said you could say that maybe ma'aser is more because it requires a humer. These are nice for us, not in Rebbi Yehuda's shtot. But as Rebbi Yehuda, shvi'is was humer and because it was humer, everybody that's choshed on shvi'is may not take shvi'is more seriously than ma'aser. So to the extent you're choshed on a shvi'is, you're for sure going to be choshed on ma'aser. Now, what's a makor? Is there like a raya? You have like an anecdote to share with us? With regards to demonstrating that as Rebbi Yehuda, shvi'is was humer less. The Gemara says, yes, I'm glad you asked. We have an anecdote to share. Now, Rebbi Yehuda had a friend cuz there was a person in Rebbi Yehuda's shtot that was once talking to one of his friends and [snorts] he told him, "Dayoro bar dayarta." You're a ger, the son of a geyores. And he was trying to make a derogatory point. Amalei said told him back, "Tasei vi, I hear, but at least I'm going to get s'char that I ate peiros shvi'is k'vaser." That I'm not such a an oisvorf like you. I don't eat peiros shvi'is. You see that somebody that would eat peiros shvi'is was much an oisvorf. That was like the most derogatory thing you could do cuz that was like his comeback. "You're a dayoro bar dayarta. I hear, but at least that's nothing compared to what you do." What someone that eats peiros shvi'is, >> [snorts] >> where it's assur to eat peiros shvi'is, that's the worst thing in the world. Apparently, as Rebbi Yehuda was humer and Zok Rebbi Bar Bar Chana in the name of Rebbi Yochanan, that our Mishna that seems to be open to the idea that by people maybe ma'aser was more humer than shvi'is, so Rebbi Akiva still told him that's the style of Mishna. Rebbi Yehuda Rebbi Yehuda Rebbi Yehuda doesn't hold that way because as Rebbi Yehuda, over there was more humer. Right, it's not just Rebbi Yehuda, it's as Rebbi Yehuda because it's based again on these psychological factors. It could be there was a whole another version of what Rebbi Bar Bar Chana said in the name of Rebbi Yochanan, Rebbi Bar Bar Chana Rebbi Yochanan. So Rebbi Akiva still told him but the Chachamim argue with the Mishna and they hold choshed al a ma'aser, choshed al a shvi'is. That if somebody is choshed on ma'aser, he's going to be choshed al shvi'is. That's what the Chachamim Who would be the that hold that a kosher my sir is kosher again the mission said was the second that if somebody is kosher on my sir any kosher my sir. That's clearly the opinion of the star mission. Which is the maker. I will only hold kosher on my sir. It's the armor who holds. We'll see the mayor feature a little more probably on the mid base. But according to the mayor. Someone that's a kosher is a kosher if that's the case. If someone is kosher [snorts] on my sir, he's going to be kosher as well. Incidentally says kosher goes both ways. Right if the whole you say to the mayor is. That. So just like. Kosher on my sir is kosher on my sir. Kosher on my sir is going to be. Kosher on my sir. So you have two. Not everybody agrees with this mission. So the keeper stem top and everybody agrees. So there's two nice guys. In one nice guy. It's the ratio kosher on my sir. Any kosher on my sir you should know there's a marker to say that a kosher on my sir. Would be kosher on my sir. It's possible to be who right that would be the in the second mission. It's both parts of the. Beginning of the mission. Kosher on my sir. So the mayor the keeper stem top. But according to the mayor. Now that is you are going to be kosher. It's going to go both ways you kosher on you for sure going to be kosher on the other. The mayor the mayor the mayor who holds what? Who holds kosher is. Always considered. So the mayor now is going to bring these two nice guys. Of the mayor the mayor the mayor. In a slightly different variation so the math. Of the Sugya the same, but it's just that coming from another angle. Rabbeinu and Rabbi Yirmiya tell me they were Rabbis Zeira. Rabbeinu and Rabbi Yirmiya were the talmidim of Rabbi Zeira. But Amora some say it was Rabbeinu and Rabbi Zeira who were talmidim of Rabbi Yochanan. Regardless, Chada Amar, one of them said, meaning either Rabbeinu or Rabbi Yirmiya, that would be the Chada Amar Chada Amar, or the Rabbeinu and Rabbi Zeira would be the Chada Amar Chada Amar. But one of these two said in the name of Rabbi Yochanan. Right, so Rabbi Bar Bar Chanina was saying in the name of Rabbi Yochanan, and this is also in the name of Rabbi Yochanan, that the Mishna is with Rabbi Akiva in the top. Aval Chachamim Amrim, the Chachamim hold Chashud Al Ashvi'is, Chashud Al Ama'aser, focusing on that line. U'man Chachamim, who then is the Chacham, Rabbi Yehuda, right? That's the first Mishna and Amar Rabbi Bar Bar Chanina Rabbi Yochanan. V'Chada Amar, the other one said that what Rabbi Yochanan said was with Rabbi Akiva in the top. However, the Chachamim say what? A Chashud Al Ama'aser, Chashud Al Ashvi'is. Meaning, Chashud Al Ashvi'is, Chashud Al Ama'aser, but also a Chashud Al Ama'aser, Chashud Al Ashvi'is. Right, take a look at the top of the page. Kol Shegain, Chashud Al Ashvi'is, Chashud Al Ama'aser. U'man Chachamim, who's the Chacham, Rabbi Meir. It's Rabbi Meir. Where do you find this Rabbi Meir? The Tanya D'vei Rabbi Yishmael Amar Rabbi Akiva Amar Rabbi Meir, an Am Ha'aretz that took upon himself Divrei Chaverim. He made up his mind that he's going to be a Chaver. We'll see in a minute what that means. The next thing is Davar Echad, and then he became a Chashud on one thing. So he was Mekabel all Dinei Chaverim, and now all of a sudden he's not observing one of them so well. Next thing is Davar Echad, all of them are Kulah. He becomes a Chashud on everything, Divrei Rabbi Meir. V'Chachamim Amrim, the Chachamim say in a next thing, I will not listen to Davar Echad. No, you're only a Chashud for that thing. Against Kibel all Divrei Torah. What about against Tzedek who takes upon himself all the laws of the Torah. A feeling of next thing is Davar Echad, if he becomes a Chashud on one thing, this is a very powerful Halacha. Have you Chashud Al Kol HaTorah Kulah. He becomes a Chashud Al Kol HaTorah Kulah. V'Rabbi Akiva Yisrael Mumcheh. And now he becomes like a Yisrael Mumcheh. Nafkami'na, know the Nafkami'na? Meaning, what's the difference between what he was once upon a time which was a Ben Noach and now all of a sudden he's the Israel member. Enough give me know the colors condition condition. A Ben Noach's condition is not a condition. Uh Israel member's condition is going to be a condition but the bottom line is what do you see from this price that we just need to pluck out one thing and that is that [snorts] Ram Mayor holds that in a number of people all of the various the natural of the very hard he becomes natural of the very cool. But come say no. In a natural of the very hard this is that Ram Mayor shita who holds that a natural of the very hard is a natural to other things as well and that is in one of [snorts] the versions what Ram Mayor was referring to. So again it's the same two versions in Ram one was Ram Baba Ram and the other one it's Ram Yona and Ram Yermiya or Ram Yona and Ram Zeira the two versions of Ram and Ram are both tracing back to Ram. So in both Ram which completely mirror each other it's two versions of Ram. Is Ram Baba the author of both of the versions or is it Ram and Ram where not only don't we know who said what we don't even know who the two are. So this is a Ram and Ram. I forgot to look in the safe for Ram but this is like a double Ram. Is it Ram Yona and Ram Yermiya or is it Ram Yona and Ram Zeira and once you figure that out now you have to figure out who wasn't it that said what either way. The Ram now is going to digress from its digression. So we're talking about Ram. Someone that's a Ram. Ram is someone that's a Ram on my stress. Someone that's a Ram on the laws of Ram and Ram Ram specifically and someone's Ram on one is he Ram on the other Ram and the ensuing Gemara, etc., etc. We're going to the Gemara now from here really until the end of the perek is going to get involved in different halachas related to somebody that is a chashud that doesn't want to be considered a chashud or just in general the the kitzur Shulchan Aruch of being a chashud, being a ne'eman, being a quote-unquote am ha'aretz, being a a quote-unquote chaver. Like what's involved in that, right? So let's just explain this a little bit better. Once upon a time there was a concept of tumah v'taharah. Once upon a time, trumahs and and ma'aseros was a very very huge deal. It was uh it was dinei d'Oraisa. It was it was everywhere. It was extremely extremely prevalent. Dinei shmittah were things that were very very prevalent. And these were all areas where, needless to say, some people were more nizharin and other people's were less nizharin. Right? Think of tumah v'taharah. That's a huge undertaking to live your life b'taharah. To live chullin b'taharah, forget about it. And even if just trumah b'taharah, whatever it is, that was a very very big deal. The laws of trumahs and ma'aseros was also a a very very big deal. And the metzius is, if you did the analytics, you would find there were people that were nizharin, there were people that were not nizharin. And the chachamim came up with words to describe the ones that were nizharin and the ones that were not nizharin. I mean, you could say he's a nizhar and he's a not a nizhar or or he's a uh chashud. But the the terminology the Chazal used was the people that were nizharin were considered a chaver. So you could be a chaver in the world of tumah v'taharah, you could be a chaver in the world of trumahs and ma'aseros, you could be a chaver in the world of shmittah. You're someone that's going to be considered a a chaver. And the person that was not nizharin was very often just referred to as the am ha'aretz. So you think of the am ha'aretz as someone that maybe doesn't know how to learn as well as the as the talmid chacham. But at the same time, there was a concept of of an ha'aretz in in in the context of this. Possible shot is an am is a way of describing someone that's not holding so much on learning and those people very often were the ones that were not in Israel and the cover is a word that's very often referred to in the context of a of a Thomas and the Thomas is the person that was in Israel. But the bottom line is you have the am you have the cover and and really it can mean different things depending on the context that you're talking about. Now, you didn't just wake up one morning a cover. Even if you're a Thomas as we're going to say there's a of how you become a cover. There was a certain a process that you had to go about. In fact, there was a couple of that had to be made. >> [snorts] >> So, think of someone that becomes a guy. He's on himself. It's like a real couple. It's a mission. It's a couple. Right? He's on himself. He'll tell you about that's what he does. I get is a a that's a couple of right this concept of a couple. The way a person would become a cover, the way you became a man in the world of my sister etc. Was by making a couple of and it literally mirrors the couple of the look at the last sir. As uh exhibit A, right? What did the price say? People all of the virus next is next to the remain I guess you should keep it all of the I feel next I'll be in the same price we're taking two things that at first glance are that's not fair to put these two things together. True, but on some level it is because both people right now are no to the singing and you're making a couple of and the question is how do you make the couple of what happens if you end up becoming a >> [snorts] >> one of these things. The bottom line is in terms of the backdrop for everything we're going to learn from here really pretty much until the end of the park. It's going to be this hack down specifically and for sure as it relates to the rest of today's stuff, we'll get to some. the two dots at the very very bottom of the amud. We don't do that every day. It's going to be braisa after braisa after braisa, literally. Just a bunch of braisas, each one very simple, very straightforward, addressing kitzur shulchan aruch practical, it's not contemporary, unfortunately. But once upon a time very very halacha l'maaseh digdinim as relates to this general idea. Now, just one piece that's worth prefacing before we start. So [snorts] we mentioned in this previous braisa am ha'aretz to keep a lot of divrei chaverus. An am ha'aretz that was mekabel on himself divrei chaverus. So [snorts] So what does this mean? So we're talking about an am ha'aretz that's being mekabel on himself chaverus as it relates to the laws of taharos. So how does somebody go from being a quote unquote am ha'aretz, meaning he's a chashud on tum'at tahara? So someone who doesn't use tum'at tahara can't eat out of his kitchen, to now all of a sudden becoming So you have to be mekabel divrei chaverus. Am ha'aretz to keep a lot of divrei chaverus. So what is the definition of being mekabel a lot of divrei chaverus? It's a Rashi. It's three lines from the top of daf lamed amud bet. Rashi quotes a Tosefta. Mefaresh b'Tosefta d'Maseches Demai. What it means is he's mekabel as follows. Shelo yeiten truma u'maaser truma or maaser to an am ha'aretz cuz the am ha'aretz himself is chashud on inyanei tum'at tahara. So you're not going to do something that may cause your truma or maaser to become tamei. Shelo yaaseh taharos etzel am ha'aretz. Additionally, he's not going to make taharos together with an am ha'aretz. V'she yochal chulin b'tahara. He's going to eat chulin b'tahara. V'she yaaser es shehu oichel, es shehu moicher, es shehu loikeach. Anything he eats, anything he sells, anything he buys, he's going to give maaser shani. This is the way a person is mekabel chaverus. Now, notice a very interesting observation. We just said that the braisa was discussing someone that's being mekabel divrei of hours but doing the title and one of the things or a few of the things he asked me to couple is the laws of truma and maisers. The state of after that the way a person was covered you can't be a cover for the title if you're not in your truma and maisers which ties in a little bit to the first half of the but the bottom line is you would it's included in the couple that you have to make the bottom line is that's the definition of being covered in the title and on that note we begin the first Bryce. Talk to Bryce and turn around and if somebody says I want to be the title with the exception of one thing meaning we just read the that's why we read it. Inside so you see it's a whole list of things they have to be so what if a person says I'm willing to do everything but I'm not going to be I don't know that one thing on that list that's your Achilles heel that's the one thing you're not going to be so says the Bryce when I'm in it's all or nothing about the title you see again the gears and he wants to be the title but he says you know there's just one thing I'm not willing to be the title that relates to even if the thing that he doesn't want to be is not a even if it's a took not even a regular it's just a took the title even that's not going to be okay says the Bryce and maybe So what's this a Ben Levy that is coming to be the title with the exception of one thing him to be so what does it mean the title so if you take a look at it's the first narrow line with the title so if he says that I don't want to be one of those things it's also not good but the title if you have a coin that's coming to be the title exception of one thing so what the title the says I'm as dumb >> And then it says that we learn this clearly talking about the that we're done by the kind of any kind that's not in the in is not going to have a a in the now so what's the first prize so the first prize is that when it comes to it's all or nothing whether it's it's been a couple of you got to be the whole list over that's coming to be wants to be a guy you have to be a couple of everything and that's been a couple of you or a coin that's been a couple of you it's all or nothing if you say that then you're not going to be a cover you're not going to be a year you're not going to be a lady that could do the either and you're not going to be a coin that's going to be able to do the either just to speak out one tiny hour so the hand the lady the a band that wants to be a couple of you the hands the exception of one thing in the couple of you know the couple so one of the things that the band lady does so we can understand maybe what that one thing he doesn't want to do is so if you take a look at it says three things with you there with you there is with you there now in terms of what with you there means that we know you there the kind of you used to sing in the base of this you there they used to open and close the doors of the base of this in fact the matter says do a lady and that were miss you there and they were a lady and that were you there right you couldn't do both you were one or you were the other but what's this middle thing that he says what does it mean with you there that some of you still too a lady that you have a a lady says that one of the jobs that the Leviim had in the Beis Hamikdash was they used to sweep the Beis Hamikdash. They used to clean it up. So, when it would get messy, they would clean it. That's what it means Leshares. Others say that it could be what Rashi is referring to is the Mishnah in the beginning of Maseches Tamid that and also Mishnah in the beginning of Maseches Middos that says that there were Shomrim in the Beis Hamikdash. There were Kohanim that were Shomrim, there were Leviim that were Shomrim. And maybe that's what Leshares means. Leshares means to be the Shomer. It's not like a spitz definition of the word Shirus. But the Kohanim struggled a little bit to understand what Leshares means. But the emes is, we just spoke out for those holding in the in the Chumash here and we spoke about this by Richos not so long ago in some of the radio Maseches Chulin that the Leviim, although they had specific jobs, but they also had a very general job. And that is they were Nisunim Nisunim LeAharon. They were literally the right hand man of Aharon. In fact, we mentioned from the in Divrei Hayamim Alef perek 12. And Ibn Ezra in the beginning of Parshas Vayikra and the Bechor Shor says in the beginning of Parshas Balak and it it's scattered in Rishonim in different places, specifically in Rishonim on the Torah, that all the things that you find in the Beis Hamikdash that were kosher b'zar, like Shchitas kosher b'zar, Hefses u'Nituch was kosher b'zar. The Leviim were the ones that used to do it. Kosher b'zar means that a Kohen didn't have to do it. It means anyone could do it. But the maiseh who used to do it? The Leviim used to do it. And the Mekor is the pesukim in Parshas Balak, Parshas Bamidbar, in Divrei Hayamim. And that's why you find throughout Tanach that it's the Leviim, they're always the ones that are doing the Shchita. It's because that was their job, to assist to assist the Kohanim. So, it's poshut. Lesharer or Leshares means Shirus. All the avodah in the Beis Hamikdash, anything that was kosher b'zar that ultimately fell to the lap of the Leviim, it could be that's all included in Shirus. We don't have to come up with sweeping or or being Shomer. Shirus is a general term to describe avodah in the Beis Hamikdash. And that was all included in really what the job responsibilities were of the living. Anyway, moving along to the second uh Bryce. So, the first Bryce that this guy has someone who's being a cover. Again, we're focusing on the various part of this uh Sukiya. Someone that's being a cover puts me down second Bryce. Somebody that comes he wants to be a cover. In the new Should know you put some of the base side because of the nice side. Meaning person walks in he says I'm ready to be a cover. If we have Aiden literally that can see that when he was a little bit of an oxymoron, right? He's doing a little bit of a but somehow some Yentas figured out that this is what's going on. But the bottom line is that to the extent that we know that this person is holding a little bit by it because of the nice with my cover. THAT IS NICE. NOW WE'LL sit down with him and we'll train him properly and we'll make like this he'll for sure get it right. But if we don't have any evidence of to tell us that this person was already as far as we know this person is just a regular like no one ever knew him being a cover. So then we work with him. We teach him all the after we only after we're going to be my cover. Being a cover and walk those holy words. My cover and I say with my cover him for a long and eventually he's going to figure it out. So according to the in this Bryce he it's not a half cover. You can't just walk in one day and say that I'm ready to be a cover. I know the is bring it on. No, no, no. If we saw him observing it so we know he's holding by it and you know maybe we can get a sense that maybe he knows the is a little bit. Okay, so then we'll work with him. We'll teach him everything he really needs to know and he's going to be good to go. But otherwise absolutely not. So it's a little bit of a catch-22 but you have to be holding a little bit in order to join the rank and file. Being a cover my cover and I say for a long a third Bryce my >> Interesting word. Knafaim means wings. So, when we're mekabel for knafaim va'achar kach, and afterwards, mekabel letires, we're mekabel for tires. So, what does that mean? Mekabel knafaim, so very important to see Rashi. So, Rashi says knafaim is another way of saying netilas yadayim. Knafaim means netilas yadayim. So, in the event that somebody says I want to be mekabel on myself chaverus, then I'm going [snorts] to be nazir in netilas yadayim. Meaning, I'm going to be nazir, I'm going to wash my hands before I eat bread. Right? The reason we wash our hands before we eat bread So, if somebody comes and he says he wants to be mekabel for knafaim, that's good. Va'achar kach, and after he does that, mekabel letires, we'll be mekabel letires. But, if the person says any mekabel el knafaim, let's say he says that I only mekabel knafaim, mekabel noiser. That's okay. Kibbel letires like kibbel knafaim. But, if he goes in the other way af letires like kibbel, so then even if letires is not going to be okay. So, if a person wants to be mekabel only for knafaim, that in of itself is going to be okay. So, there was a concept of being mekabel not the entire chaverus, just be mekabel knafaim. That's a thing. And if you want that, that's okay. And it's not mekabel that you're not being mekabel tires. If, however, you want to be mekabel tires but you don't want to be mekabel the knafaim, that's that's not going to be okay. Rashi says that really this brice, which is the third brice, is to the first brice. What was the first brice? Someone's coming to be mekabel chaverus. Chutz me d'avaracham. If there's one line item that you leave out, it's not going to be considered a kabbal. So, after the brice, there's one exception to the rule. When it comes to knafaim, knafaim is different. In fact, knafaim, if you're only mekabel for knafaim, that in of itself is going to be okay. Now, the question is why? So, Rashi says the reason is because Knafayim is a Dover Shalem." That's like That's like a complete thing. "V'zel Ikra Chiyuv L'chol Hamitayr." It was like not just a complete thing, but it's the Ikra thing. And being that it's the Ikra thing and you are Mekabel this Ikra, that's the reason that it's going to be considered good Kabala. Fourth Brisa, "Ad Kama Hanacha Ad Kama Mekabel L'isa." So, up until what point am I Mekabel? Now, Rashi has two P'shatim what exactly the mission statement of this Brisa is. We're going to go with Rashi's second Shot. It's uh further down the Amud under the words "Lishnah Chiyuv." So, Rashi says that this fourth Brisa is really going B'hemshech to the second Brisa. So, just like the third one was talking to the first, the fourth is talking to the second. What was the second Brisa? Someone that was Boleh Kaval Chaveirus, you have to see that he was Noheg Inyanai Chaveirus. And if you didn't see him being Noheg Inyanai Chaveirus, that's a Hefkeir V'al, you can't just come on board. Right? If there were people that saw that Bitzin and B'chazai Chadorim, this person is doing what he's supposed to do, then it's give me okay. So, here's the question. How long does this person, meaning these Yentes with their binoculars, how long were they watching this guy go ahead and do it the right way for them to be able to be made now? I mean, they saw one time, there's probably a Shiur and a Mad of how long you would have to do it in order for you to be included. And as we'll see in the Brisa, this wasn't just a Machlokes, but this was [snorts] a Machlokes between the two great schools, the two great factions and academies within the Jewish people, the Machlokes between Shamai and Hillel. So, again, says the Brisa, "Ad Kama Mekabel L'isa?" Shamai and Hillel. Shamai says, "L'mushkin." As it relates to being Someaych that his Mashkin is To'er Sh'lo Sh'may. As long as you know 30 days he's been doing it the right way, so his Mashkin would be B'chezkas To'er. The reason is because Tum'as Mashkin is only D'rabanan. So, when you do Chazara, it's actually interesting, it's only Tum'ah D'rabanan, but when it becomes Tum'ah, it becomes a Rishon L'Tum'ah. It's also part of Yod Chazara. But, the bottom line is Mashkin's Tum'ah is more common because it's more common 30 days that's enough of a look so as relates to a bag head which is subject to turn me right you would have to know for a year this person has been doing it the right way but still says even for Thomas Mashkin despite fact that it's the rabbinic you would need 12 months if that's the case it sounds like who's the maker who's the maker the Mashkin it's 30 days and they saw so it has to be 12 months well if that's the case how would we and we know there's only a select few of those examples and this is not one of them so they must elevate so I mean you have to tweak it says not you'll basically just the opposite of that the solution 30 days is going to be enough this is basically the side of that they're always make all the make all here as well once you know for 30 days by 30 days always establishes something by 30 days this says on the zeros is Islam and when a person does something for 30 days that establishes some level of curious right Allah once forgot at the beginning of patches by mid [snorts] bar but the that the choice of came a month after the mission was built but you grow but the bottom line is is that if something happened for a period of 30 days that establishes a very very stark and that's what they still holds that's going to work side for the rabbinic and side for the day rises either way we just concluded four braces what were the mission statements of these four braces really it's almost two sets of two right because three was talking to one and four was talking to the two the first price was if somebody wants to be a couple of years close to the record in the couple of years and it's not only true for a couple of years it's true for a lady and it's true for a kind as well jumping to brace number three which spoke to this brace and that is the exception is what's that that's like a a very fancy way of saying the laws of on the that's like the so even if a person is just just make a couple of that right that's the point if you just make a couple of that that in of itself is going to make you a Chaver at least as it relates to that. The second Beraisa, going back, was [snorts] where if someone wants to be Mekabel it, there has to be some Riglayim L'Davar that he's doing it the right way. So, Imru [snorts] Einush Sh'lo Yikabel B'Tzei B'Soch Beisai, then Mekabel Oisai. Jumping to Beraisa four, how long a period of time? That was Machlekes B'Shamayim U'Beis Hillel. Beis Shamayim said L'Mashkin, which is a Tum'ah D'Rabbanan we could be Mekabel for Shloshim Yom, but L'K'sos, that's Tum'ah D'Oraisa U'Beis Hillel Beis Hillel version 2.0, Echad Zeh V'Echad Zeh Ish Shloshim Yom, we're always Mekabel. We're Mekabel not only by the Tum'ah D'Rabbanan, Tum'ah D'Rabbanan, but even as it relates to K'sos, which is Tum'ah D'Oraisa. Moving along. Siman Chaver, Talmud Chayles, Meches, Chazar Gabai, B'Atzmai. So, it's seven words, and it's a Siman, it's a mnemonic for seven Beraisos. So, this is an additional seven Beraisos that are related to this topic. So, the first four Beraisos were not included in the Siman. Now, we have a Yachleku here within the Beraisos, and we're going to have another seven Beraisos. Says the Gemara, we're just going to start this Tanna D'Rabbanan on Aval D'Kabel Divrei Chaveirim. If somebody wants to be Mekabel Divrei Chaveirim, so he has to be Mekabel Divrei Chaveirim. So, you have to be Mekabel in front of three people, and not just three Hedyotos. All three of the people that you're Mekabel Chaveirim in front of him need to be in their own merit Chaveirim. U'Banav U'Vnei Beisai Einam Tzerichim L'Kabel Divrei Chaveirim. However, as it relates to the person that's being Mekabel Chaveirim, his children and his Bnei Bayis, right? Bnei Bayis includes his Avadim, just the whole Shtieb, they don't have to be Mekabel in front of three Chaveirim. So, there's a Halacha that Kabalas Chaveirim has to be Bifnei Gimel, Bifnei Gimel Chaveirim. As it relates to the family, they don't have to be Mekabel Bifnei Gimel Chaveirim. Now, that's a little bit M'Duyak, they don't have to be Mekabel Bifnei Gimel Chaveirim, but it sounds like they do have to make a Kabalah, and the truth is it's M'Furash B'Tosefta. The the says that they have to be Mekabel by the baal bayis. So the family has to come to the father of the house and they have to tell him that we're being mekabel as well. But they don't have the chiyuv of having to be mekabel bifnei bifnei shlosha chaverim. Shmuel Gamliel says Shmuel Gamliel says he [snorts] says av banav uvnei veisoy tzrichin l'kabel bifnei shlosha chaverim. Even the family has to be mekabel in front of three chaverim. And the reason is in the deima chavar she kibel l'ben chavar she kibel. Meaning you were Why would be the svara that the children the baal bayis don't have to make their own kabala? Because their nimshach based on the baal If the baal bayis only does it that way, then they're probably also going to only do it that way. Shmuel Gamliel says I'm not so sure I agree with you. So the father made a kabala, that's amazing for him. But what does that have to do with the children? I their father made a kabala in a deima chavar she kibel for himself l'ben chavar she kibel, right? Not ben chavar she kibel. L'ben chavar she kibel to be the son of someone that was mekabel. So at the end of the day, yeah, my father made a kabala, that means something, but not enough in Reb Shmuel Gamliel's world. And then Reb Shmuel Gamliel said av banav uvnei veisoy tzrichin l'kabel bifnei shlosha chaverim. Meaning the chachamim held that once the baal bayis does it, so now we're ready, the children are in. Now, am I 100% convinced? No. Is it enough to be mekabel in front of the father then in and of itself is going to be okay? Reb Shmuel Gamliel says you have to do more than that. Tanu Rabbanan, next braysa. Av baal l'kabel divrei chaverim. Somebody comes to be mekabel divrei chaverim, tzrichin l'kabel bifnei shlosha chaverim. You have to be mekabel in front of three chaverim. So we knew that. That was the previous braysa. V'afilu talmid chacham, here's the chiddush tzrichin l'kabel bifnei shlosha chaverim. Even a talmid chacham has to be mekabel in front of three chaverim. Zaken v'yoshev b'yeshiva. What about a zaken v'yoshev b'yeshiva, which means someone who's a member of the Sanhedrin? Ein tzorech l'kabel bifnei shlosha chaverim. He doesn't have to be mekabel shlosha chaverim. The reason is she kvar kibel al uvashisha yashav. Because in order to become a member of the Sanhedrin, this was included in the entrance exam to getting that. So you know, you had to check off a lot of boxes. Remember in the Sanhedrin, that was one of them. Abba Shaul and Abba Shaul says, even a Talmud Chacham doesn't have to. But not just that, that a that want to be in front of him, that's also going to be a meaning the first part of the braysa was also the previous braysa. A Talmud Chacham, even a Talmud Chacham that was never is going to is going to work for that. So essentially, what do we have over here in this next braysa? It's the sixth braysa if you're counting from the beginning, it's the second braysa in the siman. By the way, the first word of the siman was right? The first braysa about the chabura it's probably the because of the because all these are talking about a chabura. So that's where you see it has to be chabura. The second we're referring to as Talmud because that's the shaila over here. The shaila is does a Talmud Chacham also have to be with shlosha or not? The Tanna Kamma the say yeah, Abba Shaul says not. Sounds a little bit like what's going on here is a is the Talmud Chacham a ne'eman as it relates to chabura or maybe he's a as it relates to chabura. Right, we mentioned in the this Talmud Chacham and chabura are a little bit synonymous here, high level. But if someone is a Talmud Chacham, he has the status of a Talmud Chacham, which by the way, over the years we've spoken about this many times, different sugias in Shas, the definition of Talmud Chacham means something else. That's why this theory is you have to be a Talmud Chacham and not a Talmud Chacham. You know, if you're going to take a a hard position on what a Talmud Chacham is, then the answer is no. If there's a more liberal definition of a Talmud Chacham, yeah, and really in different sugias, you know, sometimes [snorts] we say in halacha we do, sometimes we say we don't. But the bottom line is is that it sounds like there's a machlokes over here whether a Talmud Chacham is by definition a ne'eman or whether a Talmud Chacham might be a a chashash. So the Gemara says like this, Rabbi Yochanan commented, he said "Ben Noach and Antignos Mishnas Mishnas This This price not mishnis price. But this is the shafter. That suggests that a Talmud Chacham needs to be mekabel divrei chaveirim. It's the sheet of the Chachamim, not Abba Shaul sheetah. You want to know when this halacha was taught? It was in the times of the son of Rav Chananin ben Antignos. What shiyach is? So said Rebbe Yochanan, let me explain. Rebbe Yehudah and Rebbe Yossi is stuck with the most of this. Rebbe Yehudah and Rebbe Yossi as in the great Rebbe Yehudah and the great Rebbe Yossi. So they once had a safek in the laws of Tyras shaddu rabbonan legabe benoy shel Rav Chananin ben Antignos. So they sent a pair of rabbonan, zug shel chachamim, to the son of Rav Chananin ben Antignos, who apparently was a big bakki in the world of Tyras. So um they went and they would said zil imru leil ayin bo. Right, the shlichus was bring a physical Tyras and show it to the son of Rav Chananin ben Antignos and let him pasken. Let him see what the story is. Anyway, azlu ashku degot on Tyras. So they met benoy shel Rav Chananin ben Antignos and when they saw him, he himself was carrying Tyras. So it's a little bit confusing. They're bringing Tyras with them because they have a shiyala that they want to show the Rav. And when they meet the Rav who's benoy shel Rav Chananin ben Antignos, he himself is carrying Tyras. >> [snorts] >> So in order for him to inspect their Tyras, he had to put down his own Tyras. So oisev rabbonan degot So he said, "I'm going to put my Tyras down, but I need shomrim." So he tells his own talmidim, not these rabbonan. He tells his own talmidim, "I want you to be shomrim. I want you to watch the Tyras that I'm putting down because you lay uni bo." And then he went and he was mayin in the Tyras that they brought. In other words, benoy shel Rav Chananin ben Antignos is going to look and engage in the shiyala, but he has to put his Tyras down and he wants to make sure they're shomrim. Who's he protecting it from? From them, right? These two Tommy chachamim that are coming doesn't know who they are. So as far as he knows, maybe that Tyra's he doesn't know them. So he has his own Tommy that are name on and Tyra's he says watch this with your life and make sure these two as I engage in their Tyra's and I pass him their they don't come here. So again a little windy but that's the story. So the says also when these two these are abandoned these they went back to you who they are. They told him exactly what happened and they said that you should know that we were very insulted. He managed didn't trust us as well. We're coming with a Tyra's maybe that's why he didn't trust him maybe realize they don't know that but he says look what's going on over here. So he said shall be the Tommy that I know. He said but no you should have him and I think this is father who's but I don't know right? Who's after whom a gate in the Derek and he's also it's a bizarre what he did. So he was there he said he said don't say that and so so so so she says means my law she ain't wasting [snorts] Tyra's he's a and really ironically they took upon themselves this incredible as it relates to the Tyra's and it's for that reason he's being very he's not being Tommy he's not saying that you're a what he's saying is is that I have this huge this is very high standard that I hold myself to because I am and he's not only calling a lot of like that I'll be talking to you being a little bit too sharp. This is this is not something that you should say but the bottom line is I'm being made him and I think this is this whole idea and this that I tell him wouldn't be trusting you might it go and lean entire it's counter intuitive to what it is that we know right we entire is that's what we're talking about. You want to know when it happened it happened during the circle this time. You see from this might show you this is the way it was another brice's a cover that those story of one of of neighbors. I really am because God's son. They retain their kazaka. Meaning if their father husband was considered an Amon he was a and they was sort of negra bus or him right they never made a proper cabala. So if that's the case what happens after he dies? So they retain their kazaka actually unless they become a shame. Interesting this is a cancer where people say trailers right as in trailers. I really has got it retains its kazaka as being a place with that you can buy kosher trailers until you find out otherwise. The case is with the one different way that would come sell in this cancer and it was always a different way. So the way it doesn't have a kazaka. Come watch on the cancer has a kazaka. THIS IS A PLACE WHERE WE KNOW that people do it the right way and it's for that reason that in and of itself is going to be okay. One more brice's turn around. It should be some orders. She >> [snorts] >> misses the cover. The wife of an Amon orders that marries the cover. And this is the cover or you have the daughter of an that married the cover. I've been Amon orders. She never got the cover that was all to a cover. Three can be the cover of the cover of the cover. They all have to be the cover of the cover of the cover. So what happened? Man gets married and he uh marries someone who was previously the wife of an Amon orders or the daughter of an Amon orders. Or somebody buys an Amon orders who previously worked for an Amon orders. So these uh women have all been respectively would have to be the cover of the cover. What's the cover? So I should say I'll tell you what the cover is. The cover is because the first of these latter prices said that according to the only the person the has to be but right they have to make a little bit of a couple but they don't have to come out here is the way learns the punchline that's only true if they were part of the family at the time that the made his couple so the the father leaves in the morning he says kitchen's never going to be the same I'm on my way now to be in front of three there so whoever's part of the family that morning is going to be included in this but let's say this guy gets married a year later or he buys an year later so being that that person wasn't there at the time of the original it's not going to be included and that's what this is coming to say so says the will be in the reverse case if you have an cover that marriage and this is the Chinese smart screen after you go now from my I'm going backwards into the couple of tequila they don't have to cover the tequila I've they do have to cover the children used to say throughout the and he says let me add a connection to the name of because used to say the issue and this is the cover there was once a woman who was married to a but he said or some of the gifts she was like feeling all the and she used to always put feeling on him he was a very harsh for a person he couldn't put feeling on himself and she was there she was an she was always putting on feeling this is and then the same exact woman ended up marrying an but and then she used to start the tying the receipts of the tax collector this was like right the tax collector is possible to everything from being the so used to say that a woman I used to say by law that's the way it is and if he's good then it could have been if he's not good it is what it is but at the end of the day this Isha is really this is an Isha that's an Aza but that's being connected right she's an Aza she's an Aza but it's a connected to the Aza because you're being you're helping him do the wrong thing I mean she's an Aza as the way Aza but it's an Aza that's really working against it's working connected but bottom line the bottom line is just because she was once an Isha's so yeah then she wanted to please her husband who was a now she wants to please her husband that's a tax collector so as a result it's not necessarily going to apply either way so again the whole end of the was a bunch of we had the four that were really two right one and three were talking to each other two and four were talking to each other and then we had the and so far we went through the first four of the right it was what was that we have to with the of them I what about the second one was it with all story with does a have to be so for sure not a regular person for sure yeah this in between person and is a that was a little bit of a the third one was what does mean so really was referring to end of that the first part of the was talking about more that a should maze is a base has got to do with the same as true as it relates to and finally the last one was what does it mean right when get involved in the situation that was just the story that was the again this is just a just a way for you to remember so is the the way to to remember even though the is not about just like the third is not about I mean it is but the punchline you know it was not the the punchline is not the what was the the the Halacha that an Ishas Am Ha'aretz that marries a Haver or an Eved, if they weren't part of the family at the time of the original Kabbalah, they would have to make a a fresher Kabbalah. What about in the reverse? An Ishas Haver marries a an Am Ha'aretz. That was a big Machlokes. Chachamim held Eitzrichin Kabbalas Haverus B'techila, they're already grandfathered in from the previous Zivug. Reb Meir held they do. And the reason Reb Meir holds a woman could be an Ishas K'sheira that's Oiseres Sein Ba'alah, really depending on who her husband is, that's what she's going to go along with. So when her husband was a Haver, she went along with it. But now that the husband is a a Meches, hence Meches over here, maybe not.