Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Bechoros 29
19 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein
from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his
signature depth, clarity, and energy to
Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish,
experience it like never before. Just
click the banner or find it under the
Kumir category on the Lakewood Dafy app
or on whatever platform you're listening
from right now. Today's is
and we will begin from the Mishna on the
bottom of
so the is continuing to discuss the of
specifically the that says that if you
give a of a if the has no then he has to
treat it as a car he has to bring it to
the bdash the khan it's kachum kalen
it's a lesser level of kachum column.
But the point is that this is not only
but it also has it's treated as a car
stating that if it has a m a specific
type of mum a m a permanent m then is
that the ken gets the animal he keeps it
he eats it but being that it has a mav
he can't obviously be makid on the now
in order to determine whether a m is a
mum kaba or not a mum kava the k would
have to take the animal bring to a
specialist aka and he would make the
determination if the person who pin that
this is a kav was not a his considered
invalid. So whether a has a kav or does
not have a kav has a tremendous impact
on and only was able to make the
determination whether it did or it did
not regardless
somebody's a professional he knows how
to determine whether this animal has a
does not have a but he charges [snorts]
so is
you're not allowed to use his in other
words you're not allowed to charge money
for being the po the who's going to
determine whether something has a kabu
or not l there is one exception however
if he was a
was a person who lived in Rashi said he
was aid and was somebody that allowed to
charge money as a to determine whether
something had or not
they gave him a price list how much he
was allowed out the charge. They said
that if you're going to inspect a
behemoth dhaka, you could charge four
issures. If you're going to inspect a
behem, you could charge six issaurus.
Additionally, he used to charge money,
meaning his price had no [laughter]
nothing to do, no bearing on what the
outcome of his was going to be. Meaning,
you would think he got to charge money
if he told the cion that it's okay. It's
a mum kab for the kay. That's great. He
gets to keep it. He can eat wherever he
wants. He doesn't have the of bringing
it as a carbon. When you bring a carbon
dem there's things that have to go on
the back like this. It's all his.
Everything is is going to be for him.
Ayo used to charge money regardless of
what his was. There was a specific price
that he charged. Really it was a that he
was allowed to charge money because
ordinarily you can't charge money
stating that
to do it. Now the Mishna is very clear
that it wasn't only meaning
any person that fits the criteria of he
too would have the same he'd be allowed
to charge money for being
and it would be okay
and the say that just
what emerges then is that there's really
two criteria in order to be able to
charge money to be abus Number one, you
have to be like a you have to be you
have to be of a person. Number two, you
have to charge money regardless of what
the outcome is going to be. Either way,
the is going to analyze this very short
Mishna said that when the told that
you're allowed to charge money, they
gave him a price. They said for a four
car my time. Why more money for a
beagasa less money for a behem?
It takes more exertion more effort to
inspect the
said he's allowed to [snorts] charge
more money.
say you would charge money whether it
was a bal
I understand why he charged money for
paskkining that it's a because he's
actually benefiting the cen and being
that he's benefiting the cen so you have
to pay for this that he gave you
very simple I mean imagine he would only
charge when he was m but he wouldn't
charge when he would ask her he would be
certainly incentivized to ask that it's
a right people are going to say
The reason he said that it's because he
wants the money. If you're worried,
you're going to stop going down that
road. Meaning despite the fact that we
were dealing with a who's already a
person. He's a
but still you're concerned that people
may be and as a result you're saying
that it's not enough to charge where you
can't only charge if you ask him that
it's but you have to charge regardless
of then
there's still going to be a muck for
people to be why because let's say he so
now he can't charge money right but the
people will say
maybe he's doing it because he wants the
person to come back again and he's going
to charge him that time. Meaning if you
worry that people are going to be at him
that maybe he's not being then you're
not really alle alleviating that by
saying that you're going to charge
part you're alleviating it by saying if
it's a time you have to charge also in
that case you're not benefiting but it's
not true because if it's a Tom then
there's a good chance this person is
going to come back a second time meaning
he's not going to run to the bdash right
away and until he gets around maybe it
will develop a and maybe he'll come back
So the gar just felt that you're not
really addressing the issue. So the
gumar said no they addresses what they
said was
what the said was is that one time
allowed of charge a second time he's not
allowed to charge and being that he
charged. So there's no second time it's
only one time you charge regardless what
the outcome was going to be. And so that
reason there's no so the bottom line is
that
is not allowed to charge money. If he
charges money his is 100% invalid.
stating that there is a very important
exception to the rule. What's the
exception? If the person that's was asy
was a very person number two, he charges
in that case it's not an issue. Why does
he have to be? Incidentally, the doesn't
speak it out, but it's obvious from the
spirit of the Gmorra. because we are a
little bit worried that maybe this
person has some nas and and there's some
element of corruption that's going on
when he issues his if he's then he's
less of a so it's two criteria number
one he has to charge he's going to
charge once he can't even charge the
second time but he also has to be
someone's he has a best but he charges
money if you want
You're going to have to pay for it.
His
arm
somebody that charges money to say
his is going to be bottled.
What if somebody is
back in the day there was the paradum
and now he needs from the parad. He goes
over to somebody. He says, "Will you
help me? Will you assist me in the tyra
process? Will you sprinkle the aph of
the paradum on me? Will you bead the
together with the parad regardless of
which part of the process it is
if you charge money to be somebody with
a
we look at it as if it's literally cave
water as it relates to the we look at it
as it's ordinary ashes meaning the
person is not going to have any up to
even though we just said that you're not
allowed to charge money to issue to say
to
to be somebody with the
let's say this person that's
the
and because of this service that he
provided to you he became so you needed
him to bear he goes to the place where
the animal is to inspect the he's a and
he was forced to go through to so the is
being that you damaged him to a degree
you made him to now that you made him to
he can't eat his tuma So you're allowed
to compensate him for his loss.
You can feed him. You can give him to
drink on him. Meaning you let him make
him home. Let's say this person was an
older person and it's going to be very
hard for him to get to the place that he
needs to get again to provide the
service for he's not to charge him for
the service. But if he's an old man and
he's going to have to come out of pocket
for expenses, you're allowed to make him
whole of those expenses,
right? You're allowed to send him a a
carap.
Additionally, if he's going to have to
take a day off of work, he's going to
lose money because of the day off that
he talked. You're allowed to reimburse
him for the losses he's going to take.
And that's a very important safer of
this meaning the Mishna which is also
the previous mission says you're not let
charge money for providing certain
services. You have to do you're can't
charge him for it. You're dying. You're
an aid. You're helping somebody become
from
you're not letting it charge any money.
Stating that the fine print which is you
can't profit off it. Can't be what you
do for a living. But at the same time,
if you're going to lose money because of
the service, that already not you have
to do. So if you have expenses, you're
allowed to have a ledger of the losses
that you incurred because of the service
that you provided. You submit it and
then you're going to get reimbursed.
You're allowed to be made whole for the
services you provide. You're just not
allowed to profit for the services that
you provide regardless. So the Mishna
said that all these things whether it's
saying
you have to do you have to do for free
how do you know that
my brother says and it's a
talking
so this is a in the very beginning of
when turns And he says give back
you
the same way taught me to you know what
was saying when he said that I taught
you the way Hashem taught me
just like when Hashem taught me again
talking was he learned 40 days 40 days
40 days Hashem didn't charge right he
didn't have to pay tuition it was free
everything that he learned learned he
learned says
so too when I teach you I'm going to
teach you as well. So was the one who
taught us this but when he said I'm
teaching you
not just that I'm giving over word for
word
no it was more than that what it is is
that just like didn't charge me so too
I'm not going to charge you and that's a
li that any person who teaches is not
allowed to charge money for the that
he's teaching
just like from too I'm gonna teach it to
you.
Okay, it would have been a from here
that being that a Rebi is not supposed
to charge his
so maybe if or money for the that he's
teaching him. So if somebody can't find
a Rebi that's going to teach him for
free. So maybe he's bought them from
learning. You say, "Listen, you know, if
I uh know a yeshiva that doesn't charge
tuition, then I'll send my kids to yes,
but otherwise I learned it in the today,
right? It sounds like you would say,
"Oh, he's not going to charge me. He's
charging me. It's from the Rebi
standpoint." And it's from the
standpoint. From the Rebi standpoint,
you can't charge from the standpoint.
Maybe I'm not to pay. So, if you want to
know that's not true,
MS is you should buy it. You should
purchase it.
>> [snorts]
>> Meaning even though the Reb is not
supposed to charge, but it doesn't mean
that if the Rebi charges and that's the
only that's available that the shouldn't
buy from the standpoint.
What about a Talmed who learned but he
had to pay for it because his Rebi
charged him. So now that he becomes a
Rebi, he's going to say, "Listen, I paid
for it so I'm gonna charge as well.
Just because you bought the Tyra doesn't
necessarily mean that you should go
ahead and take regardless this mera of
it's also this is the that one is not
supposed to charge money for teaching
Tyra but the truth is you see more than
that in this what else do you see you
see that it's not only the makar that a
rebi shouldn't charge money for teaching
tyra it's a m that you shouldn't charge
really for any any mitzvah because our
mish didn't say anything about teaching
tyra what our mishna say mishna is
discussing a that's a that's or aid
or someone that's facilitating with
didn't charge for teaching. What does
one have to do with the other? Teaching
that's
that'sra
that that's very very different
but it's notra. You see from here
clearly that the understood that this is
not a that's exclusive to but it's a for
all mitzvah as well. The truth is in
different places quote
that you're not allowed to charge money
for doing any mitzvah I
so we'll have to wait for the rate
either way [snorts]
for one of the things they charge money
for is to help somebody become with the
of the and if you do the is looked at as
the apher is looked at as ordinary ashes
tomorrow in a minute I'll ask you a cash
I'm
the
with the
forum
or with the ashes of the
even if even though he's and really is
supposed to be involved in the of the
stating that even if he is the one that
was with the
way explain the garra that the reason
she's is not because the and the have
intrinsic value that's not the right
the here is not the actual apher oh now
I get to keep the apher I can use it I
can spend it I can sell it no that's not
what it is the apher doesn't have
intrinsic value the doesn't have
intrinsic value it's not yours to take
home to sell or do whatever you want
with it but rather what happened is is
that if you wanted to become from the of
you would have to have somebody assist
you. What this person is saying is is
that I will assist you to become I will
provide the service for you. I won't
charge you for the service. Thus, I'm
giving you something. What am I giving
you? The service that I'm not charging
for. That's the consideration that I'm
giving you. and we're dead. And the
truth is in the beginning
that you can beh with
but even with a service right the says
if you dance for me to the extent that
you're a good dancer you could be with
that also because it's a that she's
being from and that's considered
something of value and that's enough to
be mad is with. So what what are you
being mad with? The act of being maza,
the act of taking the ashes and the
andishing it together. What's the gumar
kasha? If you can't charge for it,
saying you're not really giving
anything. If you could charge for it,
I'm giving you a do of shave. But if I
can't charge for it, then it doesn't
have a because anyone's going to do it
for you for free. That means you didn't
give me anything of value.
our mission is talking about the actual
the actual that is the mitzvah that
you're not let charge for and from that
standpoint if you with the act of with
the act of
the is not talking about the it's
talking about taking the water that's
going to be used for the parad and
bringing it or filling it up that says
rashi is a mitzvah for mitzvah You are
allowed to charge which in it of itself
is very interesting. In other words,
even though we're saying that you're not
allowed to charge for teaching and by
extension you can't charge for doing any
mitzvah to be a d to be an aid for the
you can't charge for any of these things
a mitzvah mitzvah is different. Of
course, what comes to mind is the shami
the shami that places that we've spoken
about many times in in the raid and the
raid bites eti make a mitzvah that seems
to give the
of a
we see that this idea of
not
is that only true
with Bobby holds that you don't make we
don't look at a mitzvah as if it's a
mitzvah itself but that mitzvah has the
of maybe it' be different but either way
that's the
it's very that way says our said clearly
that you want to charge money for the
act of the that's the actual mitzvah
what does the say
it doesn't say anything about all it
says is
you
and might mean it might mean it might
mean the in fact it sounds like the is
separate and the is separate sounds like
you're you're preparing for it you're on
the level this is talking about the
actual mitzvah the is talking about the
mitzvah
Mishna said that in the event that you
needed a coen to come asking a shila for
you or to inspect a bur and this cyen
had become by doing this. So now you're
allowed to feed him food if all he had
available was food.
Why was a allowed to do that? Right? Is
not let it become.
So why in the world should it even be
for to do this? Sounds like it's okay
for the to do it. It's now can make the
how was he allowed to do this in the
first place. We're not talking about
Risa. We're talking about he went to a
bas. What's a bas? That's a field that
we know for sure once upon a time had a
caver and the field was plowed. So
midday we assume that the plowing of the
field got rid of this to but on level
we're concerned that there might be a
bone and something that would have the
ability to be the so the go but only
being that it's only a house.
You're allowed to walk in a BA process
as long as you blow in front of you. So
you have to get down on all fours and
blow in front of you. So make sure if
there's an it's going to go away from
you and then you can walk. There's a way
for a to get through.
No, you can even say more
once many people walked through it.
It was trampled on by many people. At
that point it becomes
where many people went through the bas
it's still at that point it's already
going to be okay meaning of how it's
possible that would have been allowed to
do it obviously what happened here was
he became I mean it became you're
allowed to make him or more
like who said we're talking about Tomas
M what did the mission say the had to
become the assumption for some reason
was Tomas M right he went through a
bakar but who said it was Tomas M He
became Tommy to he became Tomas. That
type of tommo
is only not allowed to become doesn't
say anywhere Tommy is not allowed to
become is not allowed to become
was a different type of said
and then the said that you're even
allowed to reimburse a person.
So let's say somebody has a a job and
now because of what you asked them to
do. So he had to take a day off. He's
losing money. So is you're allowed to
make him whole. Whatever he was supposed
to make that day had he done his job,
you can make him home.
What you pay him for is the amount of
money that a person would be willing to
take to not have to work. Meaning you
would say, let's say this person makes
$100 a day. So you say, "Hey, he makes
$100 a day. He didn't go to work today.
I owe him $100." No, because this person
makes $100 when he works. He didn't work
today. The fact that he didn't work has
some value to him. So why should you
give him the full $100, right? A person
might say, you know what, I'll take $90
and stay in bed today, [laughter] right?
It's it's definitely something that a
person might say. So you don't give him
the $100 because that's what he would
have gotten had he worked. He didn't
work. You pay him the amount of money
that he would have been willing to take
to not work. Whatever that number is,
$90, $80, that's the amount of money
that you would have to pay.
Was just that obviously this is not a a
one-sizefits-all number. Each individual
person that we're discussing, you'd have
to know what his job is, how hard his
job is, how much of a discount he's
willing to take to not have to go to
work today. That number, whatever it is,
that's the pato. That's what you'd have
to give the person
that's
in the is what exactly is actually the
more simple and that is we're dealing
with
that you give him a when nobody's
looking he gives it a maba he has an
in-house
that takes care of it for him and as a
result he ends up with a rather than a
which is a lot more convenient to the
kind. So this was a who was to take his
and convert it into a
you're not going to buy meat from this
person. Why? Because we're concerned
that this person is selling you maybe
something that's a bartam that even
didn't have a m. Now if it had a a m So
in theory, what's the problem? What do
you worry? You worry that he took his
and he gave it a mum and now he sold it
to you. So what he did is terrible. He
deserves a slap on the wrist for what he
did. He had no business. I mean it's he
was over by taking by giving it a but me
at the end of the day. I'm not the one
who gave it to him. I just want to buy
his meat. I'm not eating or anything
because once the has now you're allowed
to eat it. So the truth is it's clear
from here that we're concerned not only
that he's going to give it a but we're
also concerned that he's just a baky and
once he's a baky maybe doesn't he cuts
out the middleman he doesn't even give
it and he just eats the as if it would
have a bottom line is you don't want to
touch this person's because he's a
concern at the end of the day at least
the way the Ram learns is that maybe
he's selling you a bartan acting as if
it was really aar
Bottom line is you can't buy anything
from him. And the is you can't even buy
is the plural of you can't even buy deer
from him. Even the
right even that you're not allowed to
buy. Meaning you can't buy any meat from
him. Why? Because you're concerned that
it might be a he's a he gets he's on
maybe it's a that he's giving you. It's
there's no way you're allowed to eat
that. But as far as the
that you would think maybe you're
allowed to buy because can't be a can't
have right could be
right that was all the rage. So about
you're not allowed to but at the same
time being that looks like buster of an
ael buser of a of a of a it's very hard
to differentiate between the different
types of meats you can't buy meat even
the ber of that's the additionally
you're not allowed to buy any hides from
him any skin that comes from an animal
but only if it's in only if it wasn't
tanned the is going to say that once it
was tanned we assume for sure that it's
not of aar because this person at the
end of the day he's running an illegal
operation. So somewhere in back of his
mind, he's a little bit concerned that
the are going to come and they're going
to find out what he was doing and
they're going to take everything away
from him. So it's not that this person
would risk tanning his hides and
investing the time and the money and the
effort into it knowing that there's a
good chance that at some point this is
going to be taken away. So once it was
already processed that's ana that this
this is probably kosher meat. It's not
something wrong that that he's doing
something wrong with and as a result
that already you're buy
from him. Why? Because if it's
you're not let to buy from him wool and
it doesn't matter if the wool is meaning
it was cleaned, it was washed was
bleached or whether it's whether it's
still dirty.
You are allowed to buy from him thread
that was spun from the wool or begotten
clothing that was made from the woolen
thread that had already been spun. And
the is the same. The is to buy from him
the wool that you're not allowed to buy
because we're concerned maybe it's wool
of you're not let from it. Once he spins
it, he already exerted this effort into
it. We assume that he wouldn't have done
it if he had something else.
What's the reason the Misha said that if
someone's not allowed to buy from him
meat even from a deer because we're
concerned that he may it it looks a
little bit like the meat of a kosher
animal meat of a kosher animal you're
not allowed to buy because it might be a
bakar
were very inclusive when they issued
this and they said you can't buy from
him the meat of a of a kosher animal
because we're afraid it might be a and
even the meat of a which is kosher but
it's a so it's for sure not a but it
doesn't matter cuz it looks a little
like So this is just a very inclusive
and clearly from the sound from him
hides that weren't tan but if it was tan
you're allowed to what's the reason it's
what we spoke out in the
he would have gone through the
might find out they're going to take
everything away from me so it's not
worth it for him to go through this
effort says
my time what's the reason because you
can tell the difference between
and being that you can tell the
difference.
You have nothing to worry about.
It's a good argument.
Naturally, the skin of looks different
than the the skin of that's because of
the zak
of the z. But what if you cut out that
area? So now all of a sudden the of the
is going to look the same as the of the
now aren't you're going to say that what
do you mean you see that there's a a
hole in the area there's a gap so
shouldn't that itself be a giveaway that
really this is the so you're not going
to confuse it with the says no because
the person will always say
no this was this is really the you want
to know why there's a hole it's because
came the mice came and they they cut at
it says
Now people know the difference. It comes
down to a a question. Would you is it
possible to tell the difference between
the or is it not possible? If it's
possible, there's no reason to make the
on the if it's if it's not possible then
obviously you have to make the said
to buy wool. So you can't buy the meat
of a kind you can't buy the but only if
it's untanned. You also can't buy the
wool. And the Mishna said the wool you
can't buy whether it's
or whether it's sight. Doesn't matter if
it was washed or if it wasn't washed.
If you're not let to buy it when it was
washed certainly not let buy it when
it's dirty. Why? What's the far we just
said? You're saying that even if it's
washed you can't buy it because we're
concerned that he's going to go through
the of washing it. So even then, right,
even though we said there's a to say
that he's not going to be too much with
it, but the of washing it is a that
we're concerned he may do. So if you're
allowed to buy it when it's certainly
you you shouldn't be able to buy it when
it's says you're right.
Once you say that you're not allowed to
buy it, obviously not allowed to buy it.
The Mish is not saying two things.
Doesn't have to say two things. Say one
thing. What's the one thing? If it's
and by the way that's if it was dirty
you didn't have to say it you wouldn't
be allowed to buy it either
if you are allowed to buy it once he
spins it at that point you're allowed to
buy it. So it doesn't matter if you're
buying the spun threads or you're buying
the begudden that were made from the
spun threads. And again asks the obvious
gosh
if you buy the spun threads and
obviously you had to buy the bead that
were made from the spun threads. It's
right the made from the spun threads
were made from spun threads. So once the
threads are spun you're saying at this
point oh if he went through this it's
sure not okay then if you can buy the
threads then why would you think you
can't buy the beod? So again just
saying two things you're allowed to buy
spun threads additionally
even if it was made not from spun
threads literally means felt the point
is that it's not made necessarily from
spun threads. Thus the Mishna is saying
two things
someone does
what does it mean he's
he do he does the you're not allowed to
do
you're not allowed to buy food from him
not only can't you buy food you can't
even buy is flax
even if the pishon was combed what's the
kadesh same like in the previous you
would think that once he combed it he
was matriak that's a riot that is not
awesome cuz why is he going to get
involved and invest in something that
[snorts] maybe that going to take away
from even if he comes it
once however he spins the flax into
linen or he makes a big bag from that
spun flax at that point it's going to be
like
same that we asked on the end of the
last mish
pishon from him once he spins it into
flex then the misha says and you can buy
a beuette if he made it from the spun
flex if you can buy the spun flex
obviously
You could buy the bag that was made from
the spun flax. Says you're right. Mishna
means to say two different things.
Mishna is saying you're allowed to buy
the flax if he spun it. If you went
through the of spinning it, that's an
that there's nothing else with it.
Additionally, if he didn't spin it, but
he made a baget from it, that too would
be that it's not. And in those cases,
he'd be allowed, you'd be allowed to buy
someone who's to sell as if it's
not only can't you buy food that may be
trauma, but even which is something that
has no toma, right? Water can't be trum
even that you're not allowed to buy.
Argues and he says,
No, I disagree with meaning just because
this person is to sell Truma as doesn't
necessarily mean that you're not let to
buy what does have to do with Truma.
Meaning he's a but he's a for what he's
for. So if you have to be concerned that
maybe he's selling you something you're
not allowed to eat, don't buy it. But
there's no sad that it's true. So
there's no reason not to buy Truma.
Okay. What then can't you buy? says
anything that has a zik it has an
association with that you're not let but
if it has no atum that's something that
you won't be that's something you would
be able to buy is going to explain a
little
what did he mean when he said again
didn't say you only can't buy something
that could be true that's not what he
said if that's what he would say The
will be very clear anything that could
be true. So you can't buy corn, you
can't be wine, you can't buy apples,
anything that's subject to the laws of
being that this person. So obviously
you're not allowed to buy. But he didn't
say that. He added language. He said
so what's he coming to you? You're not
even allowed to buy from him the inards
of fish. Why fish has no to me that
technically should be like says no
because a lot of the recipes of the
inards of fish called for sheas she is
subject to truma so that's although the
fish itself can't be trum but it
qualifies as kosh by zikas trum mistress
because it somehow is related to trumo
because it could be the she's of truma
inside the gurum That's a man when he
was
there was a butcher and this but butcher
was selling non-cosher meat specifically
he would take the non-cooser fats of an
animal and he would make believe that he
was selling the kosher fats of an
animal. Also, we know from learning that
even though
not all fats of an animal are considered
and in fact the Torah says there's four
fats of an animal that are considered
non-coosher. The rest of the fats are
kosher. What this person would do is he
was selling the non-coosher fats and he
was making believe that they were really
kosher fats.
Shut him down and said that you're not
even allowed to sell nuts.
It's as if
said in our that someone that's to sell
not only do we say you can't sell
something that might be trum but we say
you can't even sell that has no to here
too this person was to sell he was to
sell that you're not allowed to eat and
what did say can't even sell nuts nuts
can't be right two different things and
it must be it's like so what was this
then why did he stop buying nuts
told if you hold like you should have
said this person can't sell anything he
has to find a new job why nuts
gives
the [snorts]
says that really held not like held like
what was
that just because someone's doesn't mean
you can't sell anything no you are
allowed to sell things you just can't
sell anything that has anything that has
a to the thing that you're for. So over
here by and the reason he asked her nuts
because nuts had a to this illegal
operation that this person was running.
Now he was selling
what does it nuts
says because children if you want to get
them to do something for you so the way
to entice them is by giving them nuts
right it's the proverbial candy
what he would do is he would find the
children of his competition of butchers
and he would tell them bring me your
your father is a butcher he gets rid of
all the non-cos fats bring it to me cuz
I'm going to sell it and he entice them
by giving them nuts
and that's how he would have this huge
supply of non-coosher fat that he was
able to sell. So the way he got all
these non-coosh was by getting children
to steal it from their father's butcher
shop. How did he get the children to do
it? By giving them candy. So for that
reason said this person can't sell
candy. He can't sell nuts because he
held like that anything that has
over here the nuts were related somehow
they were associated with his illegal
operation and it's for that reason it
was awesome for him to do incidentally
this is a
where even though ordinarily
is likely
is going to be like but ordinarily say
that is not like over here
So if you look in the mission, there's a
little Vas
with either way just one and that is so
very interesting,
right? Some you have to go 20 block to
learn one Mishna. So here we had like
seven Mishnayas in in one block. But the
one of the themes of the DA was the
Mishna said that if someone is of
he's not allowed to charge money for it.
The same is true.
And the how do you know that you're not
at a charge for providing these
services?
And it was also Italian
when he taught he said
what did he mean when he said
just like I myself when I learned from
didn't he didn't build me for the he
taught me so too I'm not going to I'm
not going to charge you either clearly
in the and will speak it out like we
spoke out we went through the d is that
this is not unique it's not exclusive
the but really it's true for all but
it's certainly true for
says that you're not allowed to charge
money for teaching you're not allowed to
charge money you're not allowed to
charge money for doing a mitzvah stating
that there was a very important caveat
in the Mishna that's the safe of the
Mishna the Mishna said that in the event
that I'm asking you to provide these
services for me and you're going to take
a loss you're going to have to incur
some sort of loss you're c and you're
going to have to become tummy which
means you can't eat your tuma or you're
a z which means you're gonna have to
hire somebody to take you on his so in
those cases is that of course you can
make me in fact even if I have a job and
now because of what I'm doing for you I
have to be buckled from the that I
ordinarily do is you can reimburse me as
a as a as a as a puck because the is
that even though I'm not allowed to
profit off of this but at the same time
to prevent the loss that's something
that you are allowed to make me the we
learned here
test. But the truth is that there's
another gamar that very much complements
this that you have to learn even in a
just in order to understand on a level
that we're learning that's
in the says as follows
was one of the
he was a he was a he would pass in and
people would come to him fighting and he
would say I'm willing to hear your case.
I'm willing to bask in, but it's going
to cost you. And he would take an est
from this
and he would take an est from the other
after he was
how is allowed to do this folk.
Isn't it not to take
you going to tell me the push to answer?
What's the push to answer? What's
that's if you don't take from both of
them
because you're afraid that he may if one
person's going to pay the other person's
not. So you're going to be incentivized
somehow maybe subconsciously consciously
to help this person
that he was taking from both of them
but says it's not true because
is that a reason
when the doesn't mean that you shouldn't
be corrupt when you ask
for that we have a different what's the
punch line of this price says
You're never allowed to take has nothing
to do with the corruption. The
corruption that
means you're not allowed to take money
from someone that you're asking for. It
sounds like says the even if both people
will pay you still that is it's going to
be awesome. So again,
isn't it proof whatever the proof is or
proof from that means even if there's no
concern that you're going to be mishb
even if you're doing it
even if you take money from both of them
even then it's
When do we say it's not okay? That's if
you're taking it as
when Ka took it. He didn't take it for
the actual. Meaning he wasn't offering
it as money. You want me to give you a
it was he was taking it more for the
that was going to be involved in the
work that he was going to have to do.
Meaning because I'm gonna have to put in
work. It's gonna take me three hours to
figure out what the is and my rate is x
amount of dollars an hour. That's why
was I mean it wasn't wasn't like I'll
slip you $100 for a no have to put three
hours. Gave him an invoice. It was
itemized. He explained to him exactly
what he was doing. But says that
shouldn't help but it's a which
one second.
What kind of did wasn't duration. It was
decayer. Meaning it wasn't shott. He
said, "I did I put in three hours of
work. My rate is $50 an hour. I want you
to give me $150." No, that's not what
Ker was doing. What kind of was saying
was, "I put in three hours of work." And
because of the three hours of work, I
had a rebuttal from what I usually do
for 3 hours. That came at an expense.
That's what the invoice said. The
invoice didn't say I charge x amount of
dollars an hour. The invoice said that I
lost x amount of dollars per hour for
the effort that I had to put into this
sock. And that's what he was charging it
for. Meaning it's not the ratio of our
mish, it's the saf of our
that's the same ratio that says that now
to charge money says I don't have to
incur a loss either. So what kind of was
doing was he was just preventing what
the says and this is where this picks up
where our left off
is that okay it's so you just takes
who takes money
it's disgusting
but if he does it as disgusting and as
repulsive as it might be it's something
that's going to be okay what's in this
Are we talking about a D that's taking
money for the
R is talking about where you didn't take
money for the actual he's not taking
money for his he's taking money for his
it's quote unquote he's getting paid for
what he lost out because of the work
that he's doing for you it's the save of
the Mishna Vton and the Mishna says or
the Bryce says Mkhur
This is very important because didn't
say anything about so the say that even
though it's okay it just means it's okay
in the sense that and I can reimmerse
you it's fine but in terms of whether
this is a nice thing to do absolutely
not
one of the
how is he allowed to take an from the
from
it's not
he's not
because what he took was
he took it from both parties but at the
end of the day why would do something
that's gives a very important answer
when do we say it's that if it's that's
if it's
if this is not something that people are
aware nobody realizes that this diet is
charging but
that he took was
you know why because had a
And his job was
he would smell the wines in the to see
whether the wines were going bad. They
weren't going bad. So he can advise
people that have wine sellers back in
the day [laughter] exactly what to what
to do with their wine. So Ka was a wine
connoisseur. He was a big mason in Yan
and people used to pay him the zuza and
everybody knew that that's what Karna
did. So if Karna is now sitting and he's
prosecuting a shila, it's posh that he's
not doing his job. If he's not doing his
job, he's losing out. So there was a
that's something that you're allowed to
take. says our mission said
that's only if you you're taking money
for the actual but let's say you're
taking
you're taking money for a loss that you
incurred that's already okay stating
that there's a price a price that our
doesn't mention for that you have to go
to with a price who says
which the garra says obviously is
referring to someone who's taking
stating that there's a Within the world
of there's a distinction
and
that's
even though but it's
something you're allowed to do. In fact,
the great one of the role he took this
asked
said
that a rebi is not allowed to charge
money for teaching.
So how do we explain the ministrol? The
ministrol is there yeshivas and you
charge money and and of course people
charge money to teach tyra. So if that's
the case, how is it
this that the today is is that people
teach and they get paid for it
to the extent that this person doesn't
have
other than the that he teaches in that
case it's going to be okay and the
reason is
then TS says and even if
You have to say that today any person
that has a job and his part his 9 to5 is
that he teaches it's obvious that it's
coming at the expense of of another job
that he can't have and as a result it's
considered
that's something that's already going to
be Okay. He says, "Okay, this is with
this is the you learn this." Yes. What's
going on? Whoa. So, uh, how you how you
let charge tuition the
pit that this is something that's okay?
But if you go through
really adds another says that it could
be that this is a person's entire maybe
it's different. Meaning K this wasn't
carnosa. Cara had a parnosa. Cara had a
job. What car do? who used to smell the
wines was and charge money people money
for it and that's the way he supported
his family that was kind of so it wasn't
to do it you're getting involved in
you're running into issues but says to
the extent that it's your could be it's
not an issue two number one it could be
that makes it
or you could say that if it's your maybe
it's going to be different regardless
but but that's posit just to keep it
simple that this
with this would
to the now
it's just to mention we don't have time
to go through this thoroughly to go
through this properly but obviously if
you're talking about charging money for
for teaching that's the is right here
so of course you have to mention the
raamita is mentioned in two places it's
in office pericid
where the with regards to the Mishna hey
and it's also
The Mishna says
a person does not want to make a crown
for him to be great with.
He also can't be his hammer. Your
proverbial hammer. Hammer is something
that you make with can't be your hammer.
Hill used to say
means say means not it's referring to
but the mission is very very sharp
and the here is one of the longest rams
you'll ever see has a tremendous This
where talks about this idea and he says
it's very much and he says he looks
around in the world and he sees people
are not careful in it and you see from
here that if a person wants to to learn
to teach whatever it is that's great
it's not
like the says in the end
talks about all the tremendous madas but
if he's going to do this and be forced
to take money from people or even to be
missp
but it's going to be through his Torah.
It's something that's going to be
awesome. And then the Raam says there's
many rias to it. And he says his are
that go through many
that were and he says if you think about
it doesn't make sense. Hill was an right
hill didn't have the money to be able to
go into there was nobody that was going
to sponsor Hill. I mean if there was
ever a good cause to sponsor Hill so
Hill would be able to learn Tyra. I mean
Hill. So how is it Shia? How is it Shia?
says the rabb that the great hill
couldn't find somebody to give him money
to support him so that he'd be able to
sit and learn the rabb says if you find
it about he goes through many he
mentions ka incidentally look at car is
one of the great the great in we're
asking kash from ka we're ka ka is one
of the says what did ko do ka used to
charge because everybody knew that karna
had a job what k used to he was in a
wine cell and he would be
How is why is Ka doing that? He's one of
the Israel says the because and
he quotes others as well. They were all
observing this
says
very shock very very shy said the same
thing in it's
says
They're very tired.
This is as sharp as it gets very very
both times very stating that
is which is longer than the ra's peace
and is the ra and at the end the says he
doesn't believe is the ultimate
authority when it comes to
And the Mishna who of course was the
bish said he doesn't believe that the
meant what it sounds like the rama meant
and the mission says that I think what
the ra saying is that a person should
try his best maybe to be misspest
himself but to fill in the gaps if it
doesn't work of course he's allowed to
take but after after the mishna
mitigates the the punchline of the ra
and he says no way the rama meant 100%
what it sounds like he meant says like
He says we know we have a works with as
much as works with what's the m and
what's but and plays a very important
role in says
We find that the Israel always was to
take from the
even though we know that we always pass
like the certainly inn
I believe that proves that the ra's
is not
says the reason must be
and listen
If the
and wasn't
people wouldn't be able to learn
[snorts]
and would be forgotten
but because we have
says the I think number one that the Ram
doesn't mean what everybody thinks the
Rama means but he says for conversation
purposes let's assume the Ram does mean
what everybody thinks he means the past
in the he says but the end of the day
it's not I know it's not because look at
the okay but why not is coming from he's
coming from what happened to what
happened to all these says the
just like we know that you're not let
stating that sat down he wrote what do
you mean you're not let
he realized that come to point the gulas
whatever that it would be impossible for
to be transmitted orally and unless
we're going to write it down with and
be forgotten. So it's for that reason
that we have and we have all the we have
he felt it was it was necessary for
otherwise
it's in the same veins as the even if
the right it doesn't matter as it
relates to today
we need people to learn we need people
to teach and if the only way to learn
would be if you'd be inspired like and
you wouldn't be able to help somebody
sit and learn and you wouldn't be able
earn a parasa by being a rabbio by
teaching
and it's for that reason says
and fears
because
it's for that reason you know there such
a it goes hand in hand with the whole
movement and the fact that so many
people couldn't learn the whole day
that's why it's otherwise it'd go
backwards and that's this cassive mish
that he wrote hundreds and hundreds of
years ago that even if
But at the end of the day, this is an
incidentally the
and it's on the side of the pit that are
in the back of the so if you have in the
back of your so on the side he has a
tremendous tremendous as well. He has a
tremendous and he asks many catches on
the he says number one bringing me rise
from hill. All you see from there is
that maybe was but
we have no
for 12 years. So we have no to that. So
we have no to we have no to we have no
to these great sadik say he's very
bothered how I'm coming he says not just
that all the talk about giving money to
another right someone's
going to be
there so many all those people are all
doing terrible things then he says one
very thing we know is
said,
"We've spoken out so much rate on this."
That's why it's said, "I'm not teaching
my son." No, I'm going to teach him.
So, what are you doing? You're telling
your son not to earn a part, not to have
a job. No one can support him. He's
going to starve to death. What are you
doing? You're going to be
That's not something you're allowed to
do.
How is he allowed to do that?
He says, "Well, that's where was his was
that I'm going to teach my son to have."
So what what was doing to his children?
What was he doing? The terror says knew
the
is
there are people that that understand
the in being in supporting wanted his
son to learn and somebody was going to
support him and he knew it was okay not
like because if
it's on the side of the back of the
THAT WHAT THAT IT'S NOT okay and you
have all the whole of the ra then was
setting up his kids to really be in a
situation that he's not allowed to set
them up in
all these other he for himself that was
okay maybe it's a
but as a regardless we have with the
Mishna and very very shar we spoke this
once
someone asked
and quotes the he says wrote this
hundreds of years ago
it's true today so of Of course, even
though these Rams are very sharp, but
the very important caveat and
qualification of the and that is a it's
not something that's relevant. And I