Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Bechoros 27
3 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein
from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his
signature depth, clarity, and energy to
Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish,
experience it like never before. Just
click the banner or find it under their
category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or
on whatever platform you're listening
from right now. Today's
and we are at the beginning of the
fourth.
So we're familiar already with if
somebody has an animal a kosher animal
is you have to take the firstborn male
and give it to the ken. And there's an
interesting from a kum perspective
that's unique to and that is that not
only do you have to give your bkar to a
if the bkar is a it has no m it has no
blemish but the same is true if the bkar
has a m even if it has a kav the type of
mum that would not allow you to take
this animal and put it on the m a and a
both go to the k that's a because
ordinarily a balm is considered
when it comes to so that has a doesn't
go on the misb that has a doesn't go on
the mb it still has kadusha there are
things that you need to observe from a
kach perspective the fact despite the
fact that it has a but m is usually a
very important gamecher the one
exception to the rule is the of where
the it's learned out from says that even
a
maintains its status as musk is you have
to give it to the kite stating That is a
difference with what the is going to do
whether he received aaram
he's going to bring us a carbonar he's
not going to bring us a carbon he's
going to be able to treat it to a very
large degree as if it's either way the
Mishna says that if you have a whether
it's a or
you can't give the immediately to the
interesting you would think
it was born it's aar I'm very excited I
want to
my mitzvah of taking this bakar and give
it to the says the Mishna it's not that
way in fact you need to raise this
animal for a certain period of time
before you're going to be allowed to go
ahead and to give it to a how long of a
period that's
if it's
a larger animal it's 50 days
says that I agree that a
but a is not 30 days but rather
It's three months. So there's really two
in between the
number one is
or is
also the holds less time for the madaka
more time for the behemasa
30 days 50 days in clearly saw it in the
reverse that a massa is 50 days but a
madak is more it's going to be three
months
what happens if the coin goes over to
him as soon as the baby's born and he
says give it to me I want it sooner ra
meaning not only are you not obligated
to give it to him for that period of
time but you're not allowed to give it
to him and even if says I want it now
during this earlier time you can't give
it to let's say the animal
and he told him
I want you to give it to me because I
want to eat it right now in that case
it's going to be another caveat
let's say
Incidentally, you see from those words
and speaks that this of
is true not only during the time that
stood but it's true even because if it
wasn't true then what's this caveat
of course that's what we're talking
about we're dealing with we're dealing
with clearly this is true even
the is just adding that if it was
Then is that if the animal was a where
it can go
give it to me I want to bring it as a
carbon
is you can give it to him. So
essentially what the vishna is saying is
that aar
cannot give the
immediately he has to take care of it
for a certain period of time. how long
even if the says I want you to give it
to me right away it doesn't matter even
then you can't give it to him
immediately stating that there's two
carveouts to this if it was and the says
I want it now cuz I want to eat it now
you give it to him if it was
the says I want it now cuz I want to
bring it as a carbon now you give it to
him now as well so what's
in this Mishna and that will really
explain everything that we just said is
that when a animal is born you have to
take care of it it's a big deal and
being that it's a big deal to take care
of this animal the question then arises
whose responsibility is it to take care
of this animal the has an animal it's a
little baby so instead of hiring a nurse
he says let me just give it to the cen I
have to give it to them anyways it's his
so let the cayenne deal with it let it
be on his no doesn't work that way a yid
has an obligation to first take care of
this baby for a little while when it
gets a little older it could stand on
its two feet now you go and give it to
the ken what's
The Rambam says in his based on that
permeates
it's a
true
when the ate their
ordinarily governs the way the had to
treat his matuna or his touch him once
he received it. But lamashka governs
other and kachim as well. You wouldn't
take an animal that need that was
running all over the place that needed
special care and give it to a king. That
wouldn't be a proper gift. And being
that the gift that you're giving the kay
has to be
that says that you have to wait until
the child this baby is a little bit
older and it's only at that time that
you'd go ahead and give it to the kite.
It's for that reason if the k goes over
to the is and he says that I understand
that you have a responsibility to take
care of it for a certain period of time
but I want you to know I want this cuz I
want it now it's a I want to I want to
eat it now. I'm not going to take care
of it. I'm gonna bring it home and boom,
we're gonna shed it and we're gonna eat
it. It's going to be dinner. So then you
can give it to him because you're not
giving it to the in a way where he's
going to have to take care of it wants
to eat it now. Or if it was
and it was a and the says I want it now,
I should be able to bring it as a carb
there too, you're allowed to give it to
him. The only time you have to take care
of it yourself and you can't give it to
the wants it if it means that the is
going to be forced to take care of it.
says that you need to take care of it
yourself and you can't give it to the
even if the is it doesn't matter if
however the says clearly that he's going
to immediately
then you're allowed to give him another
has to be eaten within the first year of
its life
doesn't matter if it's or if it's how do
you know that it's in the is talking
about and then it says
The bottom line is teaches me that it
has to be during the first year of its
life.
What happens if the animal was born as a
and then during its first year of life
it had a mish
to keep it for a year. [clears throat]
If it got its after its first year of
life
you're only allowed to keep it for 30
days. Lot of different in the last part
of the mishna. It's something that the
tomorrow is going to discuss in
tomorrow's stuff. Either way, the first
of the was that uh that has a bar can't
take this baby animal and immediately
give it to the he has to take care of it
for a certain period of time. How long
was that?
The has to be with
he has to be with 50 days.
How do you know this?
It's learned out from a soar brings
excerpts of the but it's worth seeing
the entire it says
this is a parish
is referring to the Tory says that you
have an obligation to bring
that's your first crop of the shiv you
have to bring it to the mto then the
says
then the says
meaning
on the eighth day meaning if it's going
to be brought as a carbon obviously
you're not going to bring a carbon
before it's 8 days old so essentially
the in brought three different
together number one the
number two
which is the and then finally the
mitzvah
which is
it says and then it says
but
said is going on
is going on.
So what [snorts]
when do you do the when the child is 30
days old? That relates to
and from here we learn of 30 days as it
relates to
that has to take care of it for 30 days.
It says
that's the mitzvah of is related to 50
days. What does have to do with 50 days?
Because the assumption is that being
that the carbon was brought on
that was when the
ripened when was brought on
is 50 days
from the day that the carbon was
brought. So there's an element of 50
days as it relates to the mitzvah of
because again the Quran was born on it's
50 days after what after the
when the pay were fully you wait 50 days
after it ripens and it's only then that
you bring the we relate that to
which is
thus there's of 30 days mentioned of 50
days mentioned 30 days it says 50 days
it says
It also says
we say that the smallest year of 30 days
relates to the largest of 50 days
relates to but says how do you know that
is going on
and is going on maybe it's the reverse
maybe the is 50 days and the is 30 days
says why the
because look at the There first the
mentioned
and then it mentioned
then when the spoke about first it
mentioned which is the then it mentioned
the so the first of the two are the
first of the two animals mentioned is
the so we relate which is 50 days the
second of the two is
the second of the types of mentioned is
which is the so the goes to the
goes to doesn't it make more sense to
say
two are right near each other meaning
then it says then it says then it says
so the two that are near each other is
and so doesn't it make more sense rather
than say the earlier to the earlier and
the latter to the latter maybe say the
two that are together those are the ones
that go together and then to take the
two book ends and put them together as
well the point is maybe being that it
says
And then right afterwards it says
maybe that means that which is
supposed to be 30 days said you're
right. It says tasa with regards to the
it says king. Then it says but as
relates to the it says
to tell me more time for the says okay
meaning it sounds like the way is ding
it is really
is going on.
So maybe the way to dasa is not that is
now going on. So I have this man of 50
days cuz I'm borrowing this. I'm
relating it to the but maybe the man is
30 days.
How much should I be? Probably another
30 days. If 30 days maybe I should be
another 30 days
is just a general term. It means just
add doesn't mean add an additional 30
days. add whatever the deem appropriate
felt add 50 days because they like this
going on just like going on and that's
how you end up with 30 days for the 50
days for the
price that says everything that we just
taught
This is a of everything that we just was
a second
said that he agrees is 50 days he had a
difference not a lesser man but actually
a longer you have to take care of which
is 90 days why
says why is it why do you have to take
more care of a than you have to do
because it takes time for the daka to
develop teeth. How long does it take? It
takes up to three months. If it doesn't
have teeth, it can't eat on its own. It
needs its mother. So, if you're going to
give it to the cayenne, you're only
giving the bakar. You're not giving the
mother to the kayen. What's this behi
at that point? Now, we're going to be
ready. Now, you can go give it to the
Mishna said that has a to take care of
the for a certain period of time. How
long? holds 30 days 50 days holds 50
days doesn't argue with regards to
what if the says within this time frame
he says give it to me I want it so
theishna said
you're not let give it to him unless he
says like the said that he wants to use
it right now it was he says I'm going to
sh right now
he said I'm going to bring it as a
carbon right now but unless he says that
specifically
Even if he says I want it, meaning I'll
take care of it by myself. It doesn't
matter. You're not allowed to give it to
him. But why not? If he says that he's
willing to take care of it by himself,
let him take care of it by himself
because he looks like a who's helping
out in the B. What does that mean? Does
not go over to and tell him, listen, I
know you have an obligation to give
for you. It doesn't really matter which
you give it to. you're going to have to
give it regardless. I'll do work for
you. I'll work for you for free, quote
unquote. And in exchange, I just want
you to give me your true, right? It's a
win-win. From your standpoint, you're
giving it away anyways. From my
standpoint, I'll get it. I'll give you
free work. So, it's it shouldn't be a
big deal. Allah is you're not allowed to
do that. If the client's going to go
over to the stroll, he's going to say,
"Let me take care of this bkar for the
first 30 days, the first 50 days, what
does it look like?" It looks like it's
not necessarily but it certainly looks
like the reason the isrol is giving this
kayen the bakar is because this cyan
helped him he helped him raise he took
away the effort and the expense the cost
that would be involved of being with
this so it's
why even if the says I'm going to be
doesn't matter
So who's
with someone who has an obligation to
give
or respectively is
you're not allowed to now go and give
that or that or that
you're anyways obligated to give a le or
an once he helps you now already you're
not allowed to give him
and if you do give him
They were
regarding them that said
and it's regarding them that there's a
not only
in fact it's the last
because I only had the first I would
know
you would know that a ley or an does
this. So it's not nice what he's doing
to a certain degree. He's acting
corrupt. He's defiling his his status.
But that
it actually falls into the
it comes with regards
this to the idea of
which incidentally you see clearly in
the Bryce. It's not only true for a ken.
It's also true for a ley. Ley's entitled
to my it's also true for ani. Ani is
entitled to my
there's a whole bunch of different also
before we go the bry mentioned boyan.
What does mean why would you be in a
baso? That's our has cattle. He has an
obligation to bear. The is going to say
I'll help you in the basan. I want you
to give me the bkar. The basis that's
easy. All trumus misters come from the
basis. What's the
that's
right? You're a butcher. You have a now
to give from even that regardless that's
the price continues. It's all part of
the picture
wanted to make a wanted to say that if
somebody gives trumas
to
respectively that helps out in the
respectively that should be it's as if
you didn't give it at all and you have
to give it now.
Why didn't they do that?
Because they worried that is going to
think that I was Truma, but you gave it
to a clan that was so what the beum get
he may think that that second trum is a
real truma. So if he has teo that he has
to be mafuma for he may use this second
truma for that we're really this second
truma is not a real truma it's just so
when he's being mafish now it's been you
can't be mafish
you can't take truma that's not obligate
parents that are not obligated in trumal
and be and let it pairs that are
obligated in trum so the were just
worried about the issues that may result
from such a even though the were very
tempted to issue. They decided that
maybe it's not such a good idea.
Additionally,
even though we said,
but there's also
what is
looking for now. And now he told him,
I'm going to give you a name. I want you
to take the truma that you have to give
anyways and give it to my grandson, my
daughter's son, meaning he's a Israel,
but his grandson is a and I want you to
give it to him. It's okay. Interesting.
The is paying another to go give Truma
to his
allowed to take money for it. It's
M or not M comes up and some of the fest
but the
starts really with this price there's
something called what does that mean? If
I have trumas, even though I have to
give it to a kayen, that has value. Now
it has value. This command that we just
learned, I can actually take money from
someone who wants me to direct my truma
to a certain place stating that it's
very clear in the it's only
a is allowed to give money to a
however then it's going to be. So
regardless even though there's a
which clearly the Bryson makes a very
big deal about the Bryer quotes the
not just that the Bryer says
not just that the Bryer says that wanted
to make a and they wanted to say that
the whole tr they didn't do it for a
reason. So you would think there's no
way in the world you could ever take
anything any consideration in exchange
for where I'm going to direct my trumas
or mistress says the bride said not
necessarily the is that you're actually
allowed to take money from a not from
but you're allowed to take money from a
to give the truma to someone that that
would like you to give the but makes a
on this before goes van
the beginning of the spoke about
that
is
most
when the concluded and it said
what was the case.
So the makes a nice dick.
How come it went from talking so
generally about all types of
it should have said
and what if it was then this wouldn't be
true. So the says yeah great and in fact
is very important it's only it's not
other things why
being that has
so that everybody knows that you can't
be you can't take transfer the kadusha
from truma onto something else you can
be you can be
once it has a right there's certain
types of kadusha that you can be pa
certain types of kadusha you can't be pa
truma is something you can't be pa being
that you can't
There's nothing to worry about in the
affforementioned scenario. However, as
it relates to other mats, let's pick one
such as
it's very possible that something
terrible is going to happen. You know
why? Because
being that it's possible to be to
actually
there's issues with the here. But the
point is the point is is that you know
why you can't rely on when it comes to
for examples
because you could be so you know what's
going to happen if uh is going to go
over to another he's going to say I just
saw you an animal you have a now to give
them I have a grandson he's a you can
use the money why don't you give it to
him here's let me give it to you it's
very possible that the now takes
is going to think that it's why is he
going to think that school in cuz he's
going to think that when his grandfather
gave the isl before Zusen he was being
pa
and being that has kadusha but only
kadusha is done in so it's something
that you can be p it's possible that the
mistake is going to be made okay so
what's going to happen what's the end of
the world he's going to think it's cool
you know what's going to happen he's not
going to eat it this is today's he's not
going to eat it the way you have to eat
by it's not an issue because truma's
condition if you can't be
So what's the going to think that my Z
when he bought quote unquote the Truma
for me he was so now the Truma you can't
be the Truma that's not something you
could do but any other you could be you
don't have so this price you have the
you also have the
B which is a very important
dur you also have which is that only
works for something that You cannot be
such as but anything that you can be
such as
you're not going to have
before we go there's a very important
in
right in the beginning of the tucked
away on the first on top of the actually
second on the so the Mishna said
what the say
and was what was the was it says in the
which is the mitzvah and then it says
which is the mitzvah of then the Torah
says
it mentions the mitzvah with regards to
which is a which is a gor has an
analysis and says the garra where
makishimarasa
and pig
is after 50 days. What does it mean?
After 50 days, you wait 50 days after
the bishel of the
become ripe on
that's not really what you're counting
for. But 50 days later, then there's the
mitzvah on as it relates to you. You
compare that to of course is 30 days. As
a result, you have 50 days for behas, 30
days for an unconventional mak. But this
is the right here in the beginning of
the parasha
says that if you think about it when the
Mishna says 30 days for and 50 days fora
it sounds like we're being consistent
whatever 30 days means 50 days means and
whatever 50 days means 30 days means
okay what's the punch line the punch
line is is that there's a between the 50
days of
versus the 30 of the 30 days of pyaben.
Pyaben is after 30 days, right? But it's
not the 30th day. When you do pyen, you
do it on the 31st day. You have to wait
30 full days. And on the 31st day,
that's when you do the mitzvah of was to
bring it on. So if the mitzvah is to
bring it on, it's
which is the day that we say the pay
became ripened. So if you count then 50
days from Zionisan you're going to end
up on right obviously when do we stop
counting the last day of spir which is
the 49th day is the day before
is the 50th day so then is not the 51st
day it's the 50th day
if the
and theo
is bikurim then really beaka should be
31 days and beasa should be 50 days and
it's not mashma that way because it's
mashma that if da means 30 then gassa
means 50 and if dhaka really means after
30 as in 31 then should mean after 50
after which should be the 51st day but
inba
should be the 31st day meaning when it
says
it means after 30 days and should mean
the 50th day not after 50 days, meaning
the 51st day, but actually the 50th day.
And if that's the case that it comes
out, it's inconsistent
and blating
that there's a terita
says the mubat says a tremendous
and that is that the truth is that when
we say that
when we say that the behimagassa is that
when we say that behagasa is 50 days, it
means the 51st day as well. Why is that?
Because bakurim was supposed to be
brought on shor but he says really you
couldn't bring bakura machu. You had to
wait till the day after sh in order to
bring a bakuram. Bakur was also brought
on the 51st day. So if that's the case
it's consistent when the mishna says 30
and 50k doesn't mean the 30th day the
50th day. Pigen had to be on the 31st
day which means you have to be with the
for 31 days. [snorts] The
the were brought not on the 50th day but
rather on the 51st day because it
couldn't be brought on. Here's the
it couldn't be brought on. It had to be
brought after being that it had to be
brought after
this is going to be 31 days and this is
going to be 51 days. But truth is that
it's a very big branch. He asked the man
on the street when did you bring was
born on truth is it's aishna is right in
the beginning it's
etc etc then the says
you weren't allowed to bring before you
learn before you weren't allowed to
bring it but from didn't have to be dais
but for sure was this manas
And the rabbis
says
let's say somebody brought before
leave it there until comes and then
you're going to bring the the you do the
you can't bring it before. Okay, let's
say I brought it before it says the what
are you supposed to do? Wait until then
comes then you're going to bring the
soam got this from the can't bring it
before this is back to the envelope
arithmetic I can't bring it before which
sounds like that on itself I am allowed
to bring it stating that says to answer
right here tucked away
says that it's a misnomer it's a
misconception really you weren't allowed
to bring bakurim before and you couldn't
bring bikurim on either you had to wait
until afterm but on itself you were not
allowed to bring the emus is that at
first glance the
inb talks about says
which in fact is the
how do you know that you're not
you see clearly there's a link between
the mitzvah of and And the mitzvah but
there's a better
in the we say it
right. What do you say
is called the
you weren't even allowed to bring the
ter you had to wait until but then why
says that what it says in the
that's not what it means
and it's
the first possibly mention the parish
why wife was called
because there was aim in addition to the
we're all familiar with the that's
mentioned in great detail in
that's the
was also brought on that was the mitzvah
it was because it was the first carbon
that was brought from the
carbon was also from the that was
brought this was in
in sense. But regardless it's called not
because of the mitzvah of but rather
it's called
because of the
which is the burim that was brought on
the now that says the Mishna does say
that the bikurim of this the traditional
of the that was couldn't have been
brought before is from this the
clearly the mission is already linking
these to the but as it relates to being
called
does that have anything to do with the
it's called
in other words we have is between the
says that when the says you couldn't
bring the
it means that this man has
and according to the ra you could say
that when the refers to says It's
because that's when they brought the
like says and it's also because that was
the day that the were allowed to stop
bringing
lunch. So it's that's when they would
stop bringing bikurim. But the point is
that's
so it's for that reason it would be
according to says you weren't allowed to
bring the
on why then is referred to as there only
be one reason and that's like says it's
based on the question however is why did
theat says feel so self-confidently that
you're not allowed to bring the man on
the Mishna says you can't bring it
before it sounds like ones you could.
You have to wait until a day after why
why couldn't you bring it on itself in
two places
by the mitzvah of and
by the mitzvah of bikur brings a
beautiful from the gazi the gazi said
you know what the reason is it's based
on a ra the ram when he talks about the
sedar of how the bikuram was brought so
the ram
describes it beautifully
So you bring the you got to the
you had to take the basket and put it on
your shoulder. You had to carry it by
yourself. So it doesn't matter how many
go you have you need to now take the and
you have to put it on your shoulder.
Even if you're
doesn't matter you still had to carry
the by yourself. You couldn't give it to
any of your
and he would hold it that way on his
shoulders until he came to.
So he came to it's still on his
shoulder. He would say
and then he would take it off his
shoulder.
He would hold it by its hands
would put his hands underneath his hands
and they would do and there was another
part of the that they had now read
after he did that he would take the put
next to him
and then he left.
How do you know that it needs
the punch line?
Just like required.
Additionally, when you brought the you
had to bring a carbon with it. You had
to bring a carbon. It had to be music.
It says and we learned from there that
when you brought you had to bring a
carbon interesting rest of the story. So
when you brought the you couldn't just
bring you had to bring a carbon along
with it. You had to bring a carbon. Why?
similar to the
had to bring because
what kind of
and that's the way we it was like a in
the same exact vein yet. Oh, but by the
way the carbon you should know is not
either way.
It comes out what's the dig to bring
it's together with a carbon that carbon
is a carbon. It's not a carbon but it's
a carbon
not a carbon is not a carbon is a carbon
is but a carbon is not being that the
way you brought to was together with a
carbon.
So it's for that reason it wasn't sh
says thei to bring it on sh it was a
technicality you want to know when
this is
this is like the says you now bring it
before once comes now it's
that of course is in terms of
technicalities however there's an issue
you're going to trip up you know why
because one of the things you're
supposed to do is he's supposed to make
a carbon. There's no way to bring a
carbon cuz it's a carbon and the carbon
is not going to be in fact says
because not saying that this man doesn't
start from this.
However, says the from a practical
standpoint, you're never going to bring
it on the 50th day. You're always going
to bring it on the 51st day. Why?
Because there's a technical issue. You
have to bring a carbon and there's no
way to bring a carbon. Incidentally is
very this is but is very he says why
couldn't you be thisman with the anyways
had to bring on
anyways had to bring so
couldn't work for this as well
discusses if someone made a that he was
going to bring a carbon could he
of
Or does the shami have to be a special
carbon? Like who said the shami has to
be a special carbon? Maybe just means
means. Okay, I'm bringing because I made
another. It all works out beautifully.
Either way,
but this is the
new topic.
Even though
there's something called
etc etc said that
is
there's no I'm sorry
even though we said
it's only true it's not going to be true
if
was a And he used to give his trumas to
his. Now his gobby was he used to help
me. That's why he was his god. But at
the same time he had no problem giving
him
101. The ter is it was
we spoke about this in detail last week
where the is that is not
it's so you have to have 100 times
versus the has to be au of 101 in order
for it to be stating that said that's
only
you don't even need it's
in fact used to be by the way what do
you see from
Exactly. That not only do you see from
there that there's no of 100 but you see
from there even more than that that
there's no
fact it's
says where does come into the picture.
The truth is we spoke about this not so
long ago
says and
they both came one live 40 years one
live 60 years
that we spoke about a few weeks ago but
there's a g is the gaba or is the gim
says the g says says the g says here
says the g says if you look in
brings both and rabba So in
brings and
he brings over here he brings but
regardless was a and used to take his
why rabbit have to be truma he could eat
truma anyways the terret is he would eat
it when he was to because a is not
allowed to eat chuma so what he would do
is he would be mat the truma so now even
though he's tom he could eat the chuma
because it was again number one. Number
two
is not
have wine that was trained. He would
take two portions, two spoonfuls of the
chum and one of meaning he would put it
in a with a proportion was two times to
the chum
and he would drink from there. Moving
forward every time he took a a spoonful
or a ladle full he would remove one the
he would put one back. The point is he
would establish a once it was a bit as
long as he kept the proportions equal
there was never going to be an issue but
again he was doing it so there's no
issue of and was being even though
usually is only the name
ordinarily you have to be and then
afterwards you can eat from it right
otherwise it's
just the opposite you can buy on credit
you can get 30-day terms right now I'm
going to eat. I'll deal with it
eventually. You're going to pay. That's
fine.
But only
where is
where the came from him for example.
So those examples of where it comes from
the person's go in contrast to someone
that's because he touched the he touched
the shed.
So only someone whose
which is always in the laws of has is
prohibited from eating
that's the first second
even that it's only with regards to
can't eat it but as relates to touching
it you can touch it
for that reason
is allowed to separate so she's
preparing dough she has a mitzvah of
she's She's a she's aid. So she's with
she's allowed to prepare the why is she
allowed to be she's she's touching aid
someone who's certainly someone who has
shouldn't be able to touch the ter is
that we're dealing with
is the equivalent thereof to
for that reason is not going to be an
issue. How about eating it? What do you
do with it? give it to a kink and a kink
is allowed to eat it. Why a kinky
says because a kan he's such a kotan
that he was never really a car. So he
can't be avoid
can't be about carry. So there's no tum
that's
he could be though as a result to be
able to eat it. That's meaning he's an
adult already. He might be that he might
be Tommy. He might have a
but that's a you would be able to give
it to Rashi says what if you have a
that's a who went to
the point is not cut the point is
someone that you know 100% is you don't
have a
then she has to burn it that's the only
option
but after she burns it she should be she
should be again it's interesting the
She was she's preparing dough. It's a
she's an she was just so she's allowed
to touch. It's not an issue. We just had
someone has to eat it but only cut
allowed to eat it because only uh
someone that's doesn't have too much is
allowed to eat the truma and only a
cotton could you know for sure doesn't
have this problem. So as a result the
only person that's allowed to eat it is
the cayenne that's a cotton. If you
don't have a cen cotton burn it okay
then you should be done. No, you have to
be
the reason is
to be and then burn the you don't really
see the taking place. You want that we
should really remember the mitzvah of
and the real mitzvah of is not just to
be maf it's to give it to the ken and
the should problem is the not to eat it.
So you know what you do? You mage
something else that looks like it's not
really the real you burnt. Now you're
going to be something that only looks
like
not but that's a someone that's already
of age. It doesn't matter because mean
that's not really you're not going to
have any issues
the
all on a boat together and went to use
the bathroom. I saw there was a woman
there. So when wasn't there she came
before
and she asked the following question
someone that's a Tommy if heals is it
okay before the sun sets for him to eat
or is it not okay this was her question.
So ordinarily if somebody's coming he
goes to the mikah this is the first
mission of you have to wait until the
sun sets and only then
that's
right you have to wait until sunset
because until then even though the
person went to the mikvah but he's still
considered a he's not yet. So the
[snorts] question was what if someone
was coming mace and now this person
wants to eat
went to the does he have to wait until
the sun sets or not
turned to he said what's the if the
person's m anyways can't eat
at the end of the day the only way to
become from is with the of the so you
can you can wait for you can wait a
second day and a third day without
Yeah, you're never going to be taught.
So told, I hear what you're saying, but
the apparently was the in this is not
here now. Let's wait until he comes
back, right? He had gone away and let's
wait until he returns. Let's see what he
has to say.
Said, you know what? said
[snorts]
could be and he could eat
meaning he doesn't have to wait until
the sun sets meaning where they thought
if he's a Tommy mace then this whole
conversations of wood point why because
he anyways is going to have to have
tyrum we don't have the paradum ra said
not that way said that you don't have to
worry about the tumas m all right what
do you mean how's it told me allowed to
eat chuma because we're dealing
is really only it's really only
so as a result you don't really have to
worry about the stating that was he
should go to the but he could be
and you don't have to wait until the
sunset stating that the says the lace
says is not like so what's it mean is
not like grav so and says that's what
Rashi holds even though it's not clear
but says that's what Rashi holds
means you really have to wait until the
sun sets says that I disagree. You know
means you don't have to go to the
mikvah. What's the point? He's the
mikvah is not being tire. So it's not
too much the whole point of going to the
mikvah is really not similar
someone to
if you want has to go to the mikvah. The
last is not like him. What does it mean
is not like him? Rash is going to learn
is not like him. It sounds like all you
have to do is go to the mikvah but
beyond that you don't have to do
anything else
because really you have to go to the
mikvah and you need
is going to say that means that you
don't even have to go to the being that
we're dealing with
it's only that's going to be an issue
but if it's not
there is not going to be an issue. So
just two before we end today's and that
is so we had her a bunch of about so is
very very and
that you also have so you would have
thought that the and the of would at
least
apply for as well stating that said a
whole bunch of that are big very
important in that don't apply Number
one,
how big of a deal is
the quoted
focus for that is
said
even wanted a class. So you see from
here that's very very stating that
and the brings you don't even have to be
what you have he used to give it to is
another ordinarily is not it's not
stating that
another
ordinarily
and here too the brought
the brought Ra used to be coolers. Ra
used to be coolers. The gar continued
and the garra says someone that's Tommy
can't go near. It's very very some of
the deal with Tommy and
Tommy and stating that as it relates to
only someone who was
but if it wasn't even if it's a
doesn't matter there's no even
is only there's no ordinarily
the says you have to protect Truma you
have to make sure that you keep it out
but when it comes the
over there these are not going to apply.
just the first you would think that the
reason for this is because
so being that it's only it's for that
reason that's not case but the is that's
a very big mistake in fact the is that
is also only
meaning today init
it's only in fact held that even
the
were only it's a very important the is
at the very end of the first paragraph
foreign.
Be awesome.
So the Ram says that when the Torah
talks about the m of it says
you're going to come to it's talking to
all the
but
even though the went up but it wasn't
all of and if you don't have all of
living
Even
so all you're going to have is
incidentally it's interesting that from
the
right right around the time of the the
first almost all of living in
was still living in then destroyed the
Bikto and that talk about how he took
the and he dispersed them literally all
over the world.
traced his lineage in Spain to
that literally sent his great great
great great great grandparents on a boat
to Spain and that's traced themselves
from there. So there were already that
was setting themselves all up the world
of Yidden from the time of and from that
time until today there hasn't been a
time where of the in the world were
living in Israel. What's interesting is
is that the historians claim or people
that are in the know statisticians that
things are changing now and because of
the assimilation and the intermarriage
that's going on in the United States
this the numbers are shifting and we're
pretty close now to 50/50 and it's soon
going to be living in and the iss that
that poses a very interesting sh because
the rabb says that you need all of the
to be living in order to be
does it mean All what about what about
maybe would be enough all every single
if there's one living in that knocks out
it's definitely that it doesn't have to
be all the but would be enough if that's
the case there's a lot of
right a lot of the when it comes to you
know the
regards to are related to maybe could be
related to these as well but the bottom
line is it's a fascinating idea
incidentally
is a tremendous
says that he believes the mart was
Ezra's right comes up a lot where the
says that the beginning of he saw that
the all remained in he was very
disturbed here we built a mikd and we
need to do the where the so he made a he
said that even though my supposed to go
to the le it's not going to go to the le
anymore and the is
how can he go ahead and do that so
you'll tell me
but everyone knows The Taz the Taz says
a few times that you can't bear a whole
mitzvah right asks why is spoke about
this earlier in the week why is why
don't you say
right now they carry the baby on you
just do the can't carry the that's the
beginning of but they hold the
course is not so if that's the case how
is how why don't we say that you should
do
they respect we don't
We don't
really
because you could be you can't be
and the says
by you saying no
to say that you don't blow
you blow it on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday,
Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. You're
just not blowing it on Shabas. But over
here you're taking a whole and you're
knocking it out. That's not something
says you're supposed to give the
what you're doing. He knocked out the
whole thing.
says the
says that's how the knew that
wasn't it was only oh it's only
it's only
we haven't had
since destroyed that's a fact that's the
but stating that when The Rama brings
all these on our suggest
that all it's because it's a not in it's
a it's a and the truth is the ra the
when he brings the one of the places
this is
the that only a someone who's
has this of he's not allowed to eat
sucked
The doesn't say
what's his
whole concept the institution of
is
today
but that's a that's a technicality
is different
I think it's a
that's why the even holds that even
was only
but he brought all these is only
regarding because it's not a dinner it's
a
What's the difference?