Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

Bechoros 27

3 views
Lakewood Daf Yomi avatar
Lakewood Daf Yomi

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under their category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. Today's and we are at the beginning of the fourth. So we're familiar already with if somebody has an animal a kosher animal is you have to take the firstborn male and give it to the ken. And there's an interesting from a kum perspective that's unique to and that is that not only do you have to give your bkar to a if the bkar is a it has no m it has no blemish but the same is true if the bkar has a m even if it has a kav the type of mum that would not allow you to take this animal and put it on the m a and a both go to the k that's a because ordinarily a balm is considered when it comes to so that has a doesn't go on the misb that has a doesn't go on the mb it still has kadusha there are things that you need to observe from a kach perspective the fact despite the fact that it has a but m is usually a very important gamecher the one exception to the rule is the of where the it's learned out from says that even a maintains its status as musk is you have to give it to the kite stating That is a difference with what the is going to do whether he received aaram he's going to bring us a carbonar he's not going to bring us a carbon he's going to be able to treat it to a very large degree as if it's either way the Mishna says that if you have a whether it's a or you can't give the immediately to the interesting you would think it was born it's aar I'm very excited I want to my mitzvah of taking this bakar and give it to the says the Mishna it's not that way in fact you need to raise this animal for a certain period of time before you're going to be allowed to go ahead and to give it to a how long of a period that's if it's a larger animal it's 50 days says that I agree that a but a is not 30 days but rather It's three months. So there's really two in between the number one is or is also the holds less time for the madaka more time for the behemasa 30 days 50 days in clearly saw it in the reverse that a massa is 50 days but a madak is more it's going to be three months what happens if the coin goes over to him as soon as the baby's born and he says give it to me I want it sooner ra meaning not only are you not obligated to give it to him for that period of time but you're not allowed to give it to him and even if says I want it now during this earlier time you can't give it to let's say the animal and he told him I want you to give it to me because I want to eat it right now in that case it's going to be another caveat let's say Incidentally, you see from those words and speaks that this of is true not only during the time that stood but it's true even because if it wasn't true then what's this caveat of course that's what we're talking about we're dealing with we're dealing with clearly this is true even the is just adding that if it was Then is that if the animal was a where it can go give it to me I want to bring it as a carbon is you can give it to him. So essentially what the vishna is saying is that aar cannot give the immediately he has to take care of it for a certain period of time. how long even if the says I want you to give it to me right away it doesn't matter even then you can't give it to him immediately stating that there's two carveouts to this if it was and the says I want it now cuz I want to eat it now you give it to him if it was the says I want it now cuz I want to bring it as a carbon now you give it to him now as well so what's in this Mishna and that will really explain everything that we just said is that when a animal is born you have to take care of it it's a big deal and being that it's a big deal to take care of this animal the question then arises whose responsibility is it to take care of this animal the has an animal it's a little baby so instead of hiring a nurse he says let me just give it to the cen I have to give it to them anyways it's his so let the cayenne deal with it let it be on his no doesn't work that way a yid has an obligation to first take care of this baby for a little while when it gets a little older it could stand on its two feet now you go and give it to the ken what's The Rambam says in his based on that permeates it's a true when the ate their ordinarily governs the way the had to treat his matuna or his touch him once he received it. But lamashka governs other and kachim as well. You wouldn't take an animal that need that was running all over the place that needed special care and give it to a king. That wouldn't be a proper gift. And being that the gift that you're giving the kay has to be that says that you have to wait until the child this baby is a little bit older and it's only at that time that you'd go ahead and give it to the kite. It's for that reason if the k goes over to the is and he says that I understand that you have a responsibility to take care of it for a certain period of time but I want you to know I want this cuz I want it now it's a I want to I want to eat it now. I'm not going to take care of it. I'm gonna bring it home and boom, we're gonna shed it and we're gonna eat it. It's going to be dinner. So then you can give it to him because you're not giving it to the in a way where he's going to have to take care of it wants to eat it now. Or if it was and it was a and the says I want it now, I should be able to bring it as a carb there too, you're allowed to give it to him. The only time you have to take care of it yourself and you can't give it to the wants it if it means that the is going to be forced to take care of it. says that you need to take care of it yourself and you can't give it to the even if the is it doesn't matter if however the says clearly that he's going to immediately then you're allowed to give him another has to be eaten within the first year of its life doesn't matter if it's or if it's how do you know that it's in the is talking about and then it says The bottom line is teaches me that it has to be during the first year of its life. What happens if the animal was born as a and then during its first year of life it had a mish to keep it for a year. [clears throat] If it got its after its first year of life you're only allowed to keep it for 30 days. Lot of different in the last part of the mishna. It's something that the tomorrow is going to discuss in tomorrow's stuff. Either way, the first of the was that uh that has a bar can't take this baby animal and immediately give it to the he has to take care of it for a certain period of time. How long was that? The has to be with he has to be with 50 days. How do you know this? It's learned out from a soar brings excerpts of the but it's worth seeing the entire it says this is a parish is referring to the Tory says that you have an obligation to bring that's your first crop of the shiv you have to bring it to the mto then the says then the says meaning on the eighth day meaning if it's going to be brought as a carbon obviously you're not going to bring a carbon before it's 8 days old so essentially the in brought three different together number one the number two which is the and then finally the mitzvah which is it says and then it says but said is going on is going on. So what [snorts] when do you do the when the child is 30 days old? That relates to and from here we learn of 30 days as it relates to that has to take care of it for 30 days. It says that's the mitzvah of is related to 50 days. What does have to do with 50 days? Because the assumption is that being that the carbon was brought on that was when the ripened when was brought on is 50 days from the day that the carbon was brought. So there's an element of 50 days as it relates to the mitzvah of because again the Quran was born on it's 50 days after what after the when the pay were fully you wait 50 days after it ripens and it's only then that you bring the we relate that to which is thus there's of 30 days mentioned of 50 days mentioned 30 days it says 50 days it says It also says we say that the smallest year of 30 days relates to the largest of 50 days relates to but says how do you know that is going on and is going on maybe it's the reverse maybe the is 50 days and the is 30 days says why the because look at the There first the mentioned and then it mentioned then when the spoke about first it mentioned which is the then it mentioned the so the first of the two are the first of the two animals mentioned is the so we relate which is 50 days the second of the two is the second of the types of mentioned is which is the so the goes to the goes to doesn't it make more sense to say two are right near each other meaning then it says then it says then it says so the two that are near each other is and so doesn't it make more sense rather than say the earlier to the earlier and the latter to the latter maybe say the two that are together those are the ones that go together and then to take the two book ends and put them together as well the point is maybe being that it says And then right afterwards it says maybe that means that which is supposed to be 30 days said you're right. It says tasa with regards to the it says king. Then it says but as relates to the it says to tell me more time for the says okay meaning it sounds like the way is ding it is really is going on. So maybe the way to dasa is not that is now going on. So I have this man of 50 days cuz I'm borrowing this. I'm relating it to the but maybe the man is 30 days. How much should I be? Probably another 30 days. If 30 days maybe I should be another 30 days is just a general term. It means just add doesn't mean add an additional 30 days. add whatever the deem appropriate felt add 50 days because they like this going on just like going on and that's how you end up with 30 days for the 50 days for the price that says everything that we just taught This is a of everything that we just was a second said that he agrees is 50 days he had a difference not a lesser man but actually a longer you have to take care of which is 90 days why says why is it why do you have to take more care of a than you have to do because it takes time for the daka to develop teeth. How long does it take? It takes up to three months. If it doesn't have teeth, it can't eat on its own. It needs its mother. So, if you're going to give it to the cayenne, you're only giving the bakar. You're not giving the mother to the kayen. What's this behi at that point? Now, we're going to be ready. Now, you can go give it to the Mishna said that has a to take care of the for a certain period of time. How long? holds 30 days 50 days holds 50 days doesn't argue with regards to what if the says within this time frame he says give it to me I want it so theishna said you're not let give it to him unless he says like the said that he wants to use it right now it was he says I'm going to sh right now he said I'm going to bring it as a carbon right now but unless he says that specifically Even if he says I want it, meaning I'll take care of it by myself. It doesn't matter. You're not allowed to give it to him. But why not? If he says that he's willing to take care of it by himself, let him take care of it by himself because he looks like a who's helping out in the B. What does that mean? Does not go over to and tell him, listen, I know you have an obligation to give for you. It doesn't really matter which you give it to. you're going to have to give it regardless. I'll do work for you. I'll work for you for free, quote unquote. And in exchange, I just want you to give me your true, right? It's a win-win. From your standpoint, you're giving it away anyways. From my standpoint, I'll get it. I'll give you free work. So, it's it shouldn't be a big deal. Allah is you're not allowed to do that. If the client's going to go over to the stroll, he's going to say, "Let me take care of this bkar for the first 30 days, the first 50 days, what does it look like?" It looks like it's not necessarily but it certainly looks like the reason the isrol is giving this kayen the bakar is because this cyan helped him he helped him raise he took away the effort and the expense the cost that would be involved of being with this so it's why even if the says I'm going to be doesn't matter So who's with someone who has an obligation to give or respectively is you're not allowed to now go and give that or that or that you're anyways obligated to give a le or an once he helps you now already you're not allowed to give him and if you do give him They were regarding them that said and it's regarding them that there's a not only in fact it's the last because I only had the first I would know you would know that a ley or an does this. So it's not nice what he's doing to a certain degree. He's acting corrupt. He's defiling his his status. But that it actually falls into the it comes with regards this to the idea of which incidentally you see clearly in the Bryce. It's not only true for a ken. It's also true for a ley. Ley's entitled to my it's also true for ani. Ani is entitled to my there's a whole bunch of different also before we go the bry mentioned boyan. What does mean why would you be in a baso? That's our has cattle. He has an obligation to bear. The is going to say I'll help you in the basan. I want you to give me the bkar. The basis that's easy. All trumus misters come from the basis. What's the that's right? You're a butcher. You have a now to give from even that regardless that's the price continues. It's all part of the picture wanted to make a wanted to say that if somebody gives trumas to respectively that helps out in the respectively that should be it's as if you didn't give it at all and you have to give it now. Why didn't they do that? Because they worried that is going to think that I was Truma, but you gave it to a clan that was so what the beum get he may think that that second trum is a real truma. So if he has teo that he has to be mafuma for he may use this second truma for that we're really this second truma is not a real truma it's just so when he's being mafish now it's been you can't be mafish you can't take truma that's not obligate parents that are not obligated in trumal and be and let it pairs that are obligated in trum so the were just worried about the issues that may result from such a even though the were very tempted to issue. They decided that maybe it's not such a good idea. Additionally, even though we said, but there's also what is looking for now. And now he told him, I'm going to give you a name. I want you to take the truma that you have to give anyways and give it to my grandson, my daughter's son, meaning he's a Israel, but his grandson is a and I want you to give it to him. It's okay. Interesting. The is paying another to go give Truma to his allowed to take money for it. It's M or not M comes up and some of the fest but the starts really with this price there's something called what does that mean? If I have trumas, even though I have to give it to a kayen, that has value. Now it has value. This command that we just learned, I can actually take money from someone who wants me to direct my truma to a certain place stating that it's very clear in the it's only a is allowed to give money to a however then it's going to be. So regardless even though there's a which clearly the Bryson makes a very big deal about the Bryer quotes the not just that the Bryer says not just that the Bryer says that wanted to make a and they wanted to say that the whole tr they didn't do it for a reason. So you would think there's no way in the world you could ever take anything any consideration in exchange for where I'm going to direct my trumas or mistress says the bride said not necessarily the is that you're actually allowed to take money from a not from but you're allowed to take money from a to give the truma to someone that that would like you to give the but makes a on this before goes van the beginning of the spoke about that is most when the concluded and it said what was the case. So the makes a nice dick. How come it went from talking so generally about all types of it should have said and what if it was then this wouldn't be true. So the says yeah great and in fact is very important it's only it's not other things why being that has so that everybody knows that you can't be you can't take transfer the kadusha from truma onto something else you can be you can be once it has a right there's certain types of kadusha that you can be pa certain types of kadusha you can't be pa truma is something you can't be pa being that you can't There's nothing to worry about in the affforementioned scenario. However, as it relates to other mats, let's pick one such as it's very possible that something terrible is going to happen. You know why? Because being that it's possible to be to actually there's issues with the here. But the point is the point is is that you know why you can't rely on when it comes to for examples because you could be so you know what's going to happen if uh is going to go over to another he's going to say I just saw you an animal you have a now to give them I have a grandson he's a you can use the money why don't you give it to him here's let me give it to you it's very possible that the now takes is going to think that it's why is he going to think that school in cuz he's going to think that when his grandfather gave the isl before Zusen he was being pa and being that has kadusha but only kadusha is done in so it's something that you can be p it's possible that the mistake is going to be made okay so what's going to happen what's the end of the world he's going to think it's cool you know what's going to happen he's not going to eat it this is today's he's not going to eat it the way you have to eat by it's not an issue because truma's condition if you can't be So what's the going to think that my Z when he bought quote unquote the Truma for me he was so now the Truma you can't be the Truma that's not something you could do but any other you could be you don't have so this price you have the you also have the B which is a very important dur you also have which is that only works for something that You cannot be such as but anything that you can be such as you're not going to have before we go there's a very important in right in the beginning of the tucked away on the first on top of the actually second on the so the Mishna said what the say and was what was the was it says in the which is the mitzvah and then it says which is the mitzvah of then the Torah says it mentions the mitzvah with regards to which is a which is a gor has an analysis and says the garra where makishimarasa and pig is after 50 days. What does it mean? After 50 days, you wait 50 days after the bishel of the become ripe on that's not really what you're counting for. But 50 days later, then there's the mitzvah on as it relates to you. You compare that to of course is 30 days. As a result, you have 50 days for behas, 30 days for an unconventional mak. But this is the right here in the beginning of the parasha says that if you think about it when the Mishna says 30 days for and 50 days fora it sounds like we're being consistent whatever 30 days means 50 days means and whatever 50 days means 30 days means okay what's the punch line the punch line is is that there's a between the 50 days of versus the 30 of the 30 days of pyaben. Pyaben is after 30 days, right? But it's not the 30th day. When you do pyen, you do it on the 31st day. You have to wait 30 full days. And on the 31st day, that's when you do the mitzvah of was to bring it on. So if the mitzvah is to bring it on, it's which is the day that we say the pay became ripened. So if you count then 50 days from Zionisan you're going to end up on right obviously when do we stop counting the last day of spir which is the 49th day is the day before is the 50th day so then is not the 51st day it's the 50th day if the and theo is bikurim then really beaka should be 31 days and beasa should be 50 days and it's not mashma that way because it's mashma that if da means 30 then gassa means 50 and if dhaka really means after 30 as in 31 then should mean after 50 after which should be the 51st day but inba should be the 31st day meaning when it says it means after 30 days and should mean the 50th day not after 50 days, meaning the 51st day, but actually the 50th day. And if that's the case that it comes out, it's inconsistent and blating that there's a terita says the mubat says a tremendous and that is that the truth is that when we say that when we say that the behimagassa is that when we say that behagasa is 50 days, it means the 51st day as well. Why is that? Because bakurim was supposed to be brought on shor but he says really you couldn't bring bakura machu. You had to wait till the day after sh in order to bring a bakuram. Bakur was also brought on the 51st day. So if that's the case it's consistent when the mishna says 30 and 50k doesn't mean the 30th day the 50th day. Pigen had to be on the 31st day which means you have to be with the for 31 days. [snorts] The the were brought not on the 50th day but rather on the 51st day because it couldn't be brought on. Here's the it couldn't be brought on. It had to be brought after being that it had to be brought after this is going to be 31 days and this is going to be 51 days. But truth is that it's a very big branch. He asked the man on the street when did you bring was born on truth is it's aishna is right in the beginning it's etc etc then the says you weren't allowed to bring before you learn before you weren't allowed to bring it but from didn't have to be dais but for sure was this manas And the rabbis says let's say somebody brought before leave it there until comes and then you're going to bring the the you do the you can't bring it before. Okay, let's say I brought it before it says the what are you supposed to do? Wait until then comes then you're going to bring the soam got this from the can't bring it before this is back to the envelope arithmetic I can't bring it before which sounds like that on itself I am allowed to bring it stating that says to answer right here tucked away says that it's a misnomer it's a misconception really you weren't allowed to bring bakurim before and you couldn't bring bikurim on either you had to wait until afterm but on itself you were not allowed to bring the emus is that at first glance the inb talks about says which in fact is the how do you know that you're not you see clearly there's a link between the mitzvah of and And the mitzvah but there's a better in the we say it right. What do you say is called the you weren't even allowed to bring the ter you had to wait until but then why says that what it says in the that's not what it means and it's the first possibly mention the parish why wife was called because there was aim in addition to the we're all familiar with the that's mentioned in great detail in that's the was also brought on that was the mitzvah it was because it was the first carbon that was brought from the carbon was also from the that was brought this was in in sense. But regardless it's called not because of the mitzvah of but rather it's called because of the which is the burim that was brought on the now that says the Mishna does say that the bikurim of this the traditional of the that was couldn't have been brought before is from this the clearly the mission is already linking these to the but as it relates to being called does that have anything to do with the it's called in other words we have is between the says that when the says you couldn't bring the it means that this man has and according to the ra you could say that when the refers to says It's because that's when they brought the like says and it's also because that was the day that the were allowed to stop bringing lunch. So it's that's when they would stop bringing bikurim. But the point is that's so it's for that reason it would be according to says you weren't allowed to bring the on why then is referred to as there only be one reason and that's like says it's based on the question however is why did theat says feel so self-confidently that you're not allowed to bring the man on the Mishna says you can't bring it before it sounds like ones you could. You have to wait until a day after why why couldn't you bring it on itself in two places by the mitzvah of and by the mitzvah of bikur brings a beautiful from the gazi the gazi said you know what the reason is it's based on a ra the ram when he talks about the sedar of how the bikuram was brought so the ram describes it beautifully So you bring the you got to the you had to take the basket and put it on your shoulder. You had to carry it by yourself. So it doesn't matter how many go you have you need to now take the and you have to put it on your shoulder. Even if you're doesn't matter you still had to carry the by yourself. You couldn't give it to any of your and he would hold it that way on his shoulders until he came to. So he came to it's still on his shoulder. He would say and then he would take it off his shoulder. He would hold it by its hands would put his hands underneath his hands and they would do and there was another part of the that they had now read after he did that he would take the put next to him and then he left. How do you know that it needs the punch line? Just like required. Additionally, when you brought the you had to bring a carbon with it. You had to bring a carbon. It had to be music. It says and we learned from there that when you brought you had to bring a carbon interesting rest of the story. So when you brought the you couldn't just bring you had to bring a carbon along with it. You had to bring a carbon. Why? similar to the had to bring because what kind of and that's the way we it was like a in the same exact vein yet. Oh, but by the way the carbon you should know is not either way. It comes out what's the dig to bring it's together with a carbon that carbon is a carbon. It's not a carbon but it's a carbon not a carbon is not a carbon is a carbon is but a carbon is not being that the way you brought to was together with a carbon. So it's for that reason it wasn't sh says thei to bring it on sh it was a technicality you want to know when this is this is like the says you now bring it before once comes now it's that of course is in terms of technicalities however there's an issue you're going to trip up you know why because one of the things you're supposed to do is he's supposed to make a carbon. There's no way to bring a carbon cuz it's a carbon and the carbon is not going to be in fact says because not saying that this man doesn't start from this. However, says the from a practical standpoint, you're never going to bring it on the 50th day. You're always going to bring it on the 51st day. Why? Because there's a technical issue. You have to bring a carbon and there's no way to bring a carbon. Incidentally is very this is but is very he says why couldn't you be thisman with the anyways had to bring on anyways had to bring so couldn't work for this as well discusses if someone made a that he was going to bring a carbon could he of Or does the shami have to be a special carbon? Like who said the shami has to be a special carbon? Maybe just means means. Okay, I'm bringing because I made another. It all works out beautifully. Either way, but this is the new topic. Even though there's something called etc etc said that is there's no I'm sorry even though we said it's only true it's not going to be true if was a And he used to give his trumas to his. Now his gobby was he used to help me. That's why he was his god. But at the same time he had no problem giving him 101. The ter is it was we spoke about this in detail last week where the is that is not it's so you have to have 100 times versus the has to be au of 101 in order for it to be stating that said that's only you don't even need it's in fact used to be by the way what do you see from Exactly. That not only do you see from there that there's no of 100 but you see from there even more than that that there's no fact it's says where does come into the picture. The truth is we spoke about this not so long ago says and they both came one live 40 years one live 60 years that we spoke about a few weeks ago but there's a g is the gaba or is the gim says the g says says the g says here says the g says if you look in brings both and rabba So in brings and he brings over here he brings but regardless was a and used to take his why rabbit have to be truma he could eat truma anyways the terret is he would eat it when he was to because a is not allowed to eat chuma so what he would do is he would be mat the truma so now even though he's tom he could eat the chuma because it was again number one. Number two is not have wine that was trained. He would take two portions, two spoonfuls of the chum and one of meaning he would put it in a with a proportion was two times to the chum and he would drink from there. Moving forward every time he took a a spoonful or a ladle full he would remove one the he would put one back. The point is he would establish a once it was a bit as long as he kept the proportions equal there was never going to be an issue but again he was doing it so there's no issue of and was being even though usually is only the name ordinarily you have to be and then afterwards you can eat from it right otherwise it's just the opposite you can buy on credit you can get 30-day terms right now I'm going to eat. I'll deal with it eventually. You're going to pay. That's fine. But only where is where the came from him for example. So those examples of where it comes from the person's go in contrast to someone that's because he touched the he touched the shed. So only someone whose which is always in the laws of has is prohibited from eating that's the first second even that it's only with regards to can't eat it but as relates to touching it you can touch it for that reason is allowed to separate so she's preparing dough she has a mitzvah of she's She's a she's aid. So she's with she's allowed to prepare the why is she allowed to be she's she's touching aid someone who's certainly someone who has shouldn't be able to touch the ter is that we're dealing with is the equivalent thereof to for that reason is not going to be an issue. How about eating it? What do you do with it? give it to a kink and a kink is allowed to eat it. Why a kinky says because a kan he's such a kotan that he was never really a car. So he can't be avoid can't be about carry. So there's no tum that's he could be though as a result to be able to eat it. That's meaning he's an adult already. He might be that he might be Tommy. He might have a but that's a you would be able to give it to Rashi says what if you have a that's a who went to the point is not cut the point is someone that you know 100% is you don't have a then she has to burn it that's the only option but after she burns it she should be she should be again it's interesting the She was she's preparing dough. It's a she's an she was just so she's allowed to touch. It's not an issue. We just had someone has to eat it but only cut allowed to eat it because only uh someone that's doesn't have too much is allowed to eat the truma and only a cotton could you know for sure doesn't have this problem. So as a result the only person that's allowed to eat it is the cayenne that's a cotton. If you don't have a cen cotton burn it okay then you should be done. No, you have to be the reason is to be and then burn the you don't really see the taking place. You want that we should really remember the mitzvah of and the real mitzvah of is not just to be maf it's to give it to the ken and the should problem is the not to eat it. So you know what you do? You mage something else that looks like it's not really the real you burnt. Now you're going to be something that only looks like not but that's a someone that's already of age. It doesn't matter because mean that's not really you're not going to have any issues the all on a boat together and went to use the bathroom. I saw there was a woman there. So when wasn't there she came before and she asked the following question someone that's a Tommy if heals is it okay before the sun sets for him to eat or is it not okay this was her question. So ordinarily if somebody's coming he goes to the mikah this is the first mission of you have to wait until the sun sets and only then that's right you have to wait until sunset because until then even though the person went to the mikvah but he's still considered a he's not yet. So the [snorts] question was what if someone was coming mace and now this person wants to eat went to the does he have to wait until the sun sets or not turned to he said what's the if the person's m anyways can't eat at the end of the day the only way to become from is with the of the so you can you can wait for you can wait a second day and a third day without Yeah, you're never going to be taught. So told, I hear what you're saying, but the apparently was the in this is not here now. Let's wait until he comes back, right? He had gone away and let's wait until he returns. Let's see what he has to say. Said, you know what? said [snorts] could be and he could eat meaning he doesn't have to wait until the sun sets meaning where they thought if he's a Tommy mace then this whole conversations of wood point why because he anyways is going to have to have tyrum we don't have the paradum ra said not that way said that you don't have to worry about the tumas m all right what do you mean how's it told me allowed to eat chuma because we're dealing is really only it's really only so as a result you don't really have to worry about the stating that was he should go to the but he could be and you don't have to wait until the sunset stating that the says the lace says is not like so what's it mean is not like grav so and says that's what Rashi holds even though it's not clear but says that's what Rashi holds means you really have to wait until the sun sets says that I disagree. You know means you don't have to go to the mikvah. What's the point? He's the mikvah is not being tire. So it's not too much the whole point of going to the mikvah is really not similar someone to if you want has to go to the mikvah. The last is not like him. What does it mean is not like him? Rash is going to learn is not like him. It sounds like all you have to do is go to the mikvah but beyond that you don't have to do anything else because really you have to go to the mikvah and you need is going to say that means that you don't even have to go to the being that we're dealing with it's only that's going to be an issue but if it's not there is not going to be an issue. So just two before we end today's and that is so we had her a bunch of about so is very very and that you also have so you would have thought that the and the of would at least apply for as well stating that said a whole bunch of that are big very important in that don't apply Number one, how big of a deal is the quoted focus for that is said even wanted a class. So you see from here that's very very stating that and the brings you don't even have to be what you have he used to give it to is another ordinarily is not it's not stating that another ordinarily and here too the brought the brought Ra used to be coolers. Ra used to be coolers. The gar continued and the garra says someone that's Tommy can't go near. It's very very some of the deal with Tommy and Tommy and stating that as it relates to only someone who was but if it wasn't even if it's a doesn't matter there's no even is only there's no ordinarily the says you have to protect Truma you have to make sure that you keep it out but when it comes the over there these are not going to apply. just the first you would think that the reason for this is because so being that it's only it's for that reason that's not case but the is that's a very big mistake in fact the is that is also only meaning today init it's only in fact held that even the were only it's a very important the is at the very end of the first paragraph foreign. Be awesome. So the Ram says that when the Torah talks about the m of it says you're going to come to it's talking to all the but even though the went up but it wasn't all of and if you don't have all of living Even so all you're going to have is incidentally it's interesting that from the right right around the time of the the first almost all of living in was still living in then destroyed the Bikto and that talk about how he took the and he dispersed them literally all over the world. traced his lineage in Spain to that literally sent his great great great great great grandparents on a boat to Spain and that's traced themselves from there. So there were already that was setting themselves all up the world of Yidden from the time of and from that time until today there hasn't been a time where of the in the world were living in Israel. What's interesting is is that the historians claim or people that are in the know statisticians that things are changing now and because of the assimilation and the intermarriage that's going on in the United States this the numbers are shifting and we're pretty close now to 50/50 and it's soon going to be living in and the iss that that poses a very interesting sh because the rabb says that you need all of the to be living in order to be does it mean All what about what about maybe would be enough all every single if there's one living in that knocks out it's definitely that it doesn't have to be all the but would be enough if that's the case there's a lot of right a lot of the when it comes to you know the regards to are related to maybe could be related to these as well but the bottom line is it's a fascinating idea incidentally is a tremendous says that he believes the mart was Ezra's right comes up a lot where the says that the beginning of he saw that the all remained in he was very disturbed here we built a mikd and we need to do the where the so he made a he said that even though my supposed to go to the le it's not going to go to the le anymore and the is how can he go ahead and do that so you'll tell me but everyone knows The Taz the Taz says a few times that you can't bear a whole mitzvah right asks why is spoke about this earlier in the week why is why don't you say right now they carry the baby on you just do the can't carry the that's the beginning of but they hold the course is not so if that's the case how is how why don't we say that you should do they respect we don't We don't really because you could be you can't be and the says by you saying no to say that you don't blow you blow it on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. You're just not blowing it on Shabas. But over here you're taking a whole and you're knocking it out. That's not something says you're supposed to give the what you're doing. He knocked out the whole thing. says the says that's how the knew that wasn't it was only oh it's only it's only we haven't had since destroyed that's a fact that's the but stating that when The Rama brings all these on our suggest that all it's because it's a not in it's a it's a and the truth is the ra the when he brings the one of the places this is the that only a someone who's has this of he's not allowed to eat sucked The doesn't say what's his whole concept the institution of is today but that's a that's a technicality is different I think it's a that's why the even holds that even was only but he brought all these is only regarding because it's not a dinner it's a What's the difference?