Bechoros 26

You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under their category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. Today's DA is and we are about 10 lines from the top of DAF. [snorts] So at the very end of yesterday's d we began an intense Mishna and how to understand the mahal and the background is the of the hear of a that was a b that fell off. So it says in the Torah with regards to an animal that's caution that has a that once you eat it wherever you want to eat it. The says not just that it's you could treat it like a just like a has no association with at all. So to an animal that's hectish that now has a that you is you're allowed to eat it. you're allowed to treat it as if it was stating that the Torah says so even though in truth you're allowed to treat this animal if it's there are some limitations. One of the limitations is that you're not allowed to shear the wool of this animal that has a and it's for that reason is that the here of a that's a is something that you're not allowed to shear. If you shear it, it's going to be even if it falls off on its own, it's going to be stating that there was a very important tan. We'll see towards the end of the draft there was some drama associated with this is # rest of the story but for now the more technical aspect of it and that is the what happens if the hear of falls off on its own and then later you this which of course you're allowed to do and you're allowed to eat wherever you want. What happens with the here that had fallen off previously? meaning when the hair fell off before you shed the it's that here was now that you where the itself that you becomes any hair that's attached to it of course becomes what about the hair that had fallen off previously that had previously been so said it's said it's the said it's awesome said no you have a mistake your mira of is is incorrect because in that case where you physically did the just like the is matter the itself it's matter it's baser it's matter it's matter it's matter it's here so too it's going to be matter any here that had fallen off prior to the what then was this now did the but rather where the died on its own. It was over there that mahal said it's mut and the said that it's also in other words but yes did it according to mahal and the argued if it died on its own according to everybody would agree that it's rai said we're did it both agreed that it's mut it's when it died on its own it's over there that there was a like this we ended yesterday's d with a statement that said over in the name of the between and regarding that you either shed it or it died on its own where said it's only where it wasn't just a that had a but it was a mum that had a certification already from a rabbi who said that this is a mum you have a right to go ahead and check What's the is worry that even though it's a and technically you can argue that once you do the or once it dies on its own retroactively the here that had fallen off should be stating that the were worried they said if you're going to allow all the here that falls off to be mut you're incentivizing this person to keep his around because he's going to want to have his produced for him he'll share the wall that it produces which may eventually lead you to stumble and have from this which is not something you're allowed to do wasn't worried about that in the event that was never in that instance it's going to be awesome what's this so doesn't really explain it that much here we're going to have to wait for the to get a better understanding of it but for now all Rashi says is that a that a wasn't m yet is treated And if you had a time was when is the animal deemed as it relates to this but until that it's a we don't look at it as a but either way the which is going to be the topic of the first part of the is that even who was m was only matter if it was but to the extent that wasn't matter is even will be that any here that falls off prior to the or prior to the depending on whether you understand or in those cases it's going to be us was from a very unclear if you have an animal that's a and it's a voice is meaning there's No of says that's the it's not but rather no it's not so simple you don't necessarily assume that this is because it has but rather you can inspect it there's something you can do to potentially be m the what does that does mean to say that in the event you have with regular animals that are not the say It's for sure says why is the taras for sure? Why don't you take a look at each animal and find out if it has a m or if it doesn't have a mum? When you talk about mum in the context of kachch it has to be a mum kav. This is a serious mum. So if it's a serious m then why are we assuming that the whole let's go start inspecting each individual animal find out. It sounds like that's probably where is saying but the says if that's the case does the tanama argue with that? Who can argue with that? How could it be a where you have a animal that has that was with animals that don't have whether or not yukar go find the animal that has the moon or no the whole is us there's no one in the world the biggest in the sugis of will never tell you that if it's possible to determine in aues which is the so or he meant to say was go find the animal that's deal with it and the rest of the is going to be then there'd be no then there'd be no so obviously that's not where meant when he said I'll tell you what the price is talking about we're not talking about where an animal that's desired with a regular animal because again if that was the case would say and the would say just find the animal that's deal with it and the rest of is going to be mut we're talking about where it wasn't the physical animal but it's the wolf wool or the hair of an animal that was nar with the wool or the hair of other animals. Now, one of them was from a that's a from animals that were okay. What's the is the says it's in our said that even if you later according to the it's going to be ush said and you have to really in today's was the hair fell off prior to the and said it's going to be learned that this price is going not like a mahal who's the but rather it's going like that of the so that even if you would the wool would still be thus you have au voice there's no way to be m if the hear came from this animal or from that animal the what is going to help you how you going to find out to which animal the here belongs why argue because he holds he's in our he holds that in the case where the hair fell off of and then you shed it in that case even that it's going to be where the animal died on its own but to the extent that there was a in that case there's going to be no either way says the in this is the and not where an animal was with animals that not but rather where the here or the wool of an animal that had a was with the here or wool of animals that were and you have to add one layer to the it's talking about where you had the animal thus according to there's no way to because how you going to know which here belongs to which animal according to even though there was a Still the here is going to be hold that this is not a why is it not because to the extent that even I didn't say isn't a very heated exchange as we'll see later between regards to this yet that's when the animal died on its own not the price is talking about there was a okay very nice that's what have to do with and really before what it has to do with you have to understand a little bit better. What said? So what's your what are you inspecting for according to it's not a because the extent you then the whole thing should be laugh oh you know what probably means all you have to do is make sure it's a good meaning make sure it's the type of that's considered a that would be matter the animal in the event that it but the point is what you see from here is is as long as it's going to be enough to trigger the not like very simply and easily deflected this. And he says no means just the opposite means you have to be you have to find out if because that the only time this is true is that's what means you think just make sure it's the type of that would trigger the says the according to would be more than that number one you'd have to make sure it was a and more than that you'd have to make sure there's a certification from a this makes this into a real and it's only then that you would have the either way had asked a on what said the name is from this price again a very unclear price this price can mean anything the price doesn't say exactly what it's referring to it's with involving what exactly is the it's not clear and even he just Yukar. What does yukar even mean? Regardless he saw the groin when raven went from bulit. So we know a lot about for when raven came from back to b and he reported a lot of that he heard from the great here. Gomorrah tells us what Raven told the Yidden living in he had heard in B says the he said over this exchange in front of said the foolish Babylonians because they live in a dark land they say that are dark as well. meaning he held that his whole exchange was why he said in they never got this memo they didn't know the name what a different beer in this which would make it absolutely irrelevant to the discussion at hand is the is between and this with regards to a that was with animals that were not a where the said is something completely different. We're not talking about we're not talking about this has nothing to do with rather. So we're talking about a field that was as far as we know the landsman claimed that once upon a time somebody was buried in this field. Thus it's so the is this field will remain until you can find the meaning unless you can find the and deal with it get rid of it it's always going to be no you don't have to assume that it's until you can remove the toma but rather you can dig try to find the toma as long as you make a best efforts to find it and you couldn't find it then you could assume that it's not around anymore. Either way, we have a is when something is and now you can't find it. So what's do you assume? Oh, unless you find it, it's always going to remain or no, you try your best. If you can't find it, you can assume then maybe something happened to it says the that's this is over here. The tanakama says that if a balm was with animals that are not bal of course the first thing you do is you start looking for the bal. The question is what happens if you couldn't find it? The tanama says it's going to be awesome because the tanama holds like what did say that's the in that try look try to find it if you can't find it then okay you you you made a good attempt in that case it's going to be okay but the point is we're dealing not with here that was we're dealing with animals that were nothing to do with and that was the first shot in this set over a different something else was where you looked for it and you actually found it a field that we know for sure had a ke and now you can't find a keto somebody walks into this field he becomes let's say somebody finds the ke he says oh I found the ke it was lost and now I found it so Now somebody walks in afterwards, he starred because we assume the was lost was now found. So if somebody walks in afterwards, there's no reason that it should still be Tommy. He said he said that as far as we know there was one lost kever in this field. You failed it. So you would think for sure it should be. We assume that maybe there's another lost and as a result once you find one there's a in the whole field you don't say but rather the call so said that over the name that this is the in the holds that is that if you have animal that's it was with other animals you try to find the boom and as soon as you find a balm, you're done. You have nothing to worry about. Whereas he said, "No, you have to continue looking because even if you find a balm either way that he was laughing he said as if this price has anything to do with it has anything to do with and this price that discusses about that was with other animals have to do with here has to do with nothing to do with that. Don't bring me oras to what then is that pricer talking about where the animals themselves were if the animals theel we said then what's the shil then of course try to find the moon and and get rid of it and you'll be done. No, it's not so simple. There's two huge as it relates to something that's there's an issue over there when it comes to not being said it one way said it another way regardless that was point but as it relates to the price itself had two versions of what the might be said is bishop you looked for it in the case of the the field and that's how we would relate to our bri as well and You looked for the balm and you couldn't find the balm. The question is, do you have to worry be worried that it's still there? Do you not have to be worried that it's still there? Said it's talking about you looked for it and you found it. The question is, could I stop looking or do I have to assume that maybe there's another why didn't learn why who learned that the cases where you looked for it and you couldn't find it? He said like this. I agree there is a sheet of if there was a field that was toma and now you can't find the toma says that says it's motor why because he'll assume the to is gone what happened to the where did it go a raven came and took it away came and took it away where did it go so if you can't find and you know the was here everybody's going to agree that over here it's a problem you can't sue that is the to a case of tum But as it relates to you can't do that says he held that it wasn't you could say that no there was an animal that had a and we thought the was a m that was here to stay turns out that this animal had a it had a ra and as a result the fact that I can't find it now is maybe that it's not here in the why didn't he learn like why didn't he Today is talking about where you looked, you found it and says, "Well, I could stop looking." It makes sense if you know that there's a field that once had a caver. It's very very likely there was another caver because people don't usually bury people in their in their backyard or in their front lawn. So if one person was buried there, so there's at least a region or so that maybe somebody else was buried there. Thus there's a that that you have to search the entire field and even if you find a ke you have to continue looking over here as far as we know there was one animal that had a m I found the animal that had a m is there as far to say because one of these hundred animals had a means maybe two of the hundred animals had a m yeah if you have a whole bunch of animals together what do animals do that's a common 101 And as a result it's that if one of them is walking around with a m it's it's the other one as well. Thus he felt the same would apply to here. Either way that addresses that unclear whether it is discussing the case of the or something else. Regardless, going back to what was that the only time it would be okay to benefit from the hear of that fell off while the animal was still alive according to that would only be if the had a from that it's a but the does not have that it's a even if it has a and it's very easy to diagnose on your own. you know 100% the is going to say that this is a it doesn't matter until the says it's a we treat it as a and we're here fell off even if later you do a prop it doesn't matter what you do later that is going is always going to be us that was if somebody takes wool off even if later it gets a and is it's going to be so here we're talking about you took the hero of all the animals and then later it got and then is it's going to be awesome. The way Rashi explains means according to everybody. It's user according to it's according to the who holds that even hold that when you any here that had fallen off is going to become said the whole only said where it was but where it was even going to be but that's all where the here came off you were the was niplash we'll see in the end of the gar came off when the animal was actually but in the event that the animal the here came off while the animal was a time if later [snorts] it got a and then you did it it's for sure going to be awesome says it sounds like the only thing you need to make sure when you apply this is the hair come off when it was a time or did it come off when it was but it sounds like it came off while it was even if it never had that it's going to be it's not according to it's not enough that it's about it has to be about here it's not just make sure it wasn't a Tom as long as it was about it's not enough that it was about it has to be about it has to have we said the leness of is that until that it's about we look at it as a Tom so when the Bryce says according to what's the definition of Tom he has a much broader definition Tom means even if it has a if it We're going to look at as if it is perhaps this is really and again we're not going to have a nothing even close to it. What we're going to have is that we're going to have where it's not clear what exactly the is. So the gar is going to do what it often does and and try to recreate back into what the may be arguing about. And perhaps the is going to suggest that they were arguing if somebody takes [clears throat] that's the we just learned. What if the here came off [snorts] and afterwards it died. So yeah here came off and then the animal died. It didn't shed it. It died on its own. Whoa. Was that in the was when the animal died on its own, not when there was aud who in our Mishna came first and in the bright is just the opposite. It's and then until we see the end of the no that's not and now comes and he says that was father is who interestingly referred to his father by his first name he said ab which was a discussion for itself. So he said who was one of the who had argued with he said so it's very worry but the point is said exactly what he said in the that who was one of the was that if you going to be he only argued with in the event that there was no it had died on its own. Bottom line is you have three shittas in this bry that are really two. The tanakama the first sheet in the bry when we spoke out the tanak we said that was rais then you haduda theishna and then you had the mishna but if the tan is raisi this is back of the envelope arithmetic then the first and the third are really one. So the question is why is it threeas? It's only two then you have and then you have so we have to make up a regarding everybody agrees everybody agrees perhaps is there's no reason to say it wasn't he wasn't a but nonetheless he was from and why make he said it let's assume he said I you're not sure what the is in this it's really three not two and that arguing over an external point holds He held that is both when the animal died on its own and when there was a that's a we didn't have in the right in the we have two is or is the is the third right the is going to speak it out but we already know the answer the is the is whether the animal died on its own or whether it was if the is by both either The reason the said over the as if they're arguing when it died on its own was to say that even when it died on its own that's the bigger even says it's going to be holder that if it died on its own even holds it also The bottom line is the says no it's not two with why is the camera different let's come up with something no it's actually threeas what are the threeas the three possibilities the arguing they're arguing only the arguing only that what at the and was where it was if the animal died on its own everybody agrees it's going to be the was where you did a proper it was only over there that said that it's going to be and it's even there that hold that it's going to be oh how do you know that and we have three here there's a right whenever there's between We always pass him like so why over here is like because it's mentioned this is in version in the chosen the chosen we'll see soon why happens if they of fell off. [laughter] What's the key word? You have to underline that word. matter that in this idias this is brought down and over there it's brought down which is clearly thus even though usually why because in the chosen this like this is mentioned in the Mishna is actually that way as well which part of the Mishna the safe of the Mishna. So we didn't really go through the safe of the Mishna yesterday because the Gar is going to discuss it here in great detail. The end of the Mishna was what happens if there was there was wool that was hanging on the so you have this and there's wool that's obviously attached to the animal and then there's wool that's that's hanging. It's suspended. It's it's stuck in the animal but it's not attached to it anymore. So it's inside the wool that is attached to the animal, but [snorts] it itself is not attached. It's it's so it really depends on whether it looks like it's attached or it looks like it's not attached. If it looks like it's attached then it's going to be mut. If it looks like it's not attached then it's going to be awesome. Just like the Mishna idias is it says the word here too the safe of this Mishna is also now it doesn't mention Yehuda it doesn't mention the it doesn't mention Mahal doesn't mention it doesn't mention anybody but at the same time if you do the math and you make the to understand the of the safe of the only way to emerge is that the B is going what's the math Who's going to and you have this? That's not attached to the animal anymore. And now you the animal. What does hold with regards to when you the animal? He holds it's always he held it was never the animal the whole was where the animal died on its own but if you did it everybody holds it's going to be so if everybody holds it's going to be mut so why are we even having this conversation if it came off while it was alive and then you did a so the the world's for sure must be talking about where it died on its own okay that's the if it's going to hold that if it fell fell off and then the animal dies on its own. It's always so again it matters if the wool is magiz if it's medal it fell off and then it died it's always going to be the you'll say okay no maybe no maybe it's going according to according to so maybe the safer of the Mishna is going like's understanding of the where it died on its own but at the same time according to what does a hold it's going to be mut and if that's the case what's the Mishna saying if it [snorts] looks like it's attached it's if it looks like it's detached, it's the makes no sense. It's just the opposite. If it looks like it's attached because what happens with anything that's attached to the animal when an animal that dies, anything that's attached becomes it's an it just died. So if that's the case, then if it's attached to it, it should be. It's only if it looks like it was detached prior, then it should be mutish. There's no way to make the end work speaks out how it works according to where it died on its own. If it died on its own according to everybody else, it's always going to be awesome. So again, there's never a time it's going to be it's talking about where you it's always going to be must be it's going according to it's talking about where you know what's the if it looks like it's attached that is not anything that's attached to it. So if it looks like it's attached, it's going to be mut. If however it looks like it's detached, then it's going to be. But the point is it only works based on this arithmetic. If you learn that the of the is bottom line is we have in the chosen we also have away right here. our own brings but in the only way to make it work is for that reason. What happens if somebody removes the of an Rashi says the Shil is because to the extent that this had a there'd be no reason to assume that an would be any different than a meaning according to the which is who we're declaring the sh according to it would for sure be let's just go back for one minute what was the reason that the argued with Muhammad Why do they say it's a problem? You have a here falls off and now did it or was even after the itself is this here is always going to be what's the reason? So right at the beginning of the said it's we're afraid that you may keep the animal around. So it's for that reason it's going to be an issue. The truth is that same exact concern you would have if the hair fell off of the animal when it was a tongue. It's the same thing. We never want people to leave kachum around. Number one, there's baka issues. But besides for the bakar issues, you may end up doing work with it. You may be nana from it. If you have an ava, it was very hard to have an animal cache living in your house. It's it's complicated. You mish can't be nana from it. You can't you can't do anything with it. And any little bit of ano that you had from me, you're already running into that that we're going to learn between now and and the which is a very intent that deals with all these it's very very complicated. So if you have an animal that's we don't want people to keep these animals around and that's the spirit of why the said that we don't want you to be able to benefit from anything that happens even if it's about m you can't benefit from it. So by saying you can't benefit from it. So I'm not incentivized to keep it around. As a result, I'll deal with it. If it's a I'll sh it wherever you want. If it's a that's a I'll bring it to I'll bring it to but that's the of the but the had a very interesting sad the sad that maybe here that falls off of an maybe would be more sounds like a big even here you're not let touch from a from aim perspective is is lowest on the totem pole as far as levels of kadusha go in terms of the minion hazika is and the level of kachum the first right it's the lowest major of and you have an I mean and still had it sad that maybe they hear that falls off of an as it relates to this of maybe should be more cool what's the says you wonder if a person literally went she and you want to know if it's going to be no one says it's first let it be there's no way that that's going to be okay and he explained this question as it relates to it would be to me I think for sure would be why would it be I thought the whole spirit of is that it's awesome no because the holy of we don't want you to keep the animal around no one's keeping bring a katan around because why do you bring a katus and an cuz you're worried you're anxious you need a kap so no one's going to keep it around except there's no that you're going to keep it has no reason to go ahead and and beer as it relates to I understand why the was so because the that's why they were certainly concerned that people are going to keep it around there's no element of whenever it comes to and for that matter so over there there was no sh and this is a real shav So being that the of the is notap maybe you're going to keep it around or do you say that being that the carbon is as we know it's interesting look top line how do you know that a carbon is when you brought you had to say and you said Even though it says so you see that it's interesting that Rashi goes to find the I mean it's mentioned so many times in the beginning of this is 101 but either way that's the is notap so many of come from the fact that it's notap but at the same time is unique in that it is what about all the rate mysterious and rashy. But the bottom line is that was his question. His question was does it apply to or not? Do you say the person wants to bring it or not? Someone removed. This is the third time we have this. [snorts] It sounds like if it would fall off on its own, it would be only if you toilelish it, it's a problem. But if it would be when it was a and then later would get a it sounds like in that case it would be mutile. So if it's going to be a where there's no at all to say that the person is incentivized to be certainly in where there is a little bit of a say you should have this says no don't bring me from that because really the would be only if you can make the deal really the reason as relates that it's even if you were when we had didn't it say that was the it sounds like never said that if you remove the here from the it's going to be it sounds like even according to it has to be so the says saying that it could be there's really no difference when it comes to whether it was or we mention we mentioned but you can't make the and as a result you can't prove anything from that one final what was that as it relates to it The established must be going according to according to but what was the what was the which is detached if it looks like it's part of the wool it's if it looks like it's not meaning that we know it's detached the question is does it look attached or does it look detached okay let's define this a little bit better if the root of the hair is facing outward that looks like it's detachment. If it's protruding a little bit more than the than the than the wool, so the wool is firmly pressed against the hide of the animal, if you have wool that's protruding a little bit more, that would look like it's detached. Why didn't he learn like why did he need that the roots should be backwards? Just say if it's protruding a little bit. Because in when you look at the the wool of an animal, you're always going to have hair that's protruding a little bit more. And if protruding is already a reason to look at it as if it's detached, that every animal is going to have detached wool and every animal's going to have issues. Doesn't sound like every animal was a question of sounds like it's a very unique case. It's a but if you understand the way that understood it every animal would have it and it's not from the Mishna that that's the way it is and on that note exhale. So rather than start the new perk just to end today's d on a lighter note and this is really important because we had a very complex between and regarding the here of that fell off while the animal was alive and then did it or it died on its own whether or not that animal's going to be mut or not was he said it's going to be mut said it's going to be awesome. Now said that this is mentioned in so where is this? It's it's a long Mishna but it's to go through the entire Mishna had said about four things told from the four that you said of and we're going to make you into so apparently had issued four very controversial he wrote four chas that were Irish and had a very hard time dealing with the with these four and they told that if your will make you the best you'll get the ultimate stellar he told him if I'm going to do that then you know people are going to say that I did it because oft and I'm not going to do that I am ethical I am going to stay firm to the messiah that I have and to what I believe And I believe in these four sim that I issued and I'm not going to beer even if it comes at the expense of being the bestd of mahal was a contemporary of hill. He lived just a picture exactly when he lived and he said I'm not willing to be what were these for him. Right? So you would think these are four everyday very practical things that people struggle with on a regular basis. He used to say that and that's green blood is said it was that was this was one of the four he used to say that when it comes to comes to drink the and [snorts] they told him a story and then the gumar brings the fourth one. Regardless, regardless these are the four of Mahal, you know, you would think these were everyday things, but it it was anything but everyday things. But regardless, these were four that Mahal held for some reason, it bothered that Mahal didn't want to be he didn't want to come around to them. And it's for that reason he lost out on becoming the Israeli said. So the Gomorrah says I'm sorry that at the end after didn't want to be they put and he ended up dying and they treated him like someone who dies in and they literally did on the didn't want to be on these four he lost it on being and then they put him in and after at his instead of getting this cover that was befitting like a they ended up on his arm said I don't believe that's not possible because you want to know how great was used to come to bring the carbon you know who the most person in the Azor was in it was So who then did they put in? He said it was somebody else. It's up to there's a postcript to the story was dying. He was lying on his deathbed. He told his son, I want you to be get up publicly and say that even though my father had these four controversial, they put him in according to some and he lost that but I myself don't agree with that. If you want me to beer, then why weren't you? He said like this. He says, "You have to realize I heard what I heard. I heard from my they heard what they heard from their says, I understand why they did what they did. They had to follow their messiah. But you know what? I had to follow my messiah. I knew what I heard from my but you. You only heard my from me. And even though I'm your father but I'm a relates to the they hold not that way the said I had a responsibility to maintain the messiah that I heard but you have a responsibility to maintain your messiah and your messiah is to go with what you hear from the not where you go from the at the end says I know you still have some friends in in high places. He said, "Maybe a little nepotism. Maybe you can get me set me up with a good stellar." He told him, "No, absolutely not. Why is there something wrong? You think I'm not befitting of I don't believe in appetism. I don't believe in I don't believe in I believe that you should you should earn your keep. And if you deserve to be granted a stellar, then you're going to get it. if not not either way that's the the drama that surrounded this ma with so a few things number one so you see you see his greatness you see you see his greatness so much so you know we always speak out the raom says that if you go through all the mentioned so They're described they're presented in one of three ways. Some are presented without any title. Others are presented as most are presented as etc. It says counterintuitively the ones that were the least were called. The ones that were more called the ones that were the most had no title at all. Why not? He says because they were so great that there's no title in the world that could do justice to capture their greatness. We always say that the garra says that had the cotton was the had no title. The cotton already had a title from the wasn't it wasn't it was so you see the greatness of I saw in this or in this in the he says he says you know what was everybody's you have to bear in order to be able to bring the carbon and where are they standing in the and it's so it's the they're all standing in the people when it comes who was the greatest at that moment it was and then he goes v He says the is he said really if you think about it it should have said first and then we know the says office incidentally I was thinking gave us a right what's the more the better well-known of a you tell somebody ask a man on [laughter] the street he's not gonna say right that's probably not what he's gonna say what's he gonna tell He's going to tell you the third gave us the mission of that's the right that we have it came from but asks that why is it and then it should have been just the opposite because if comes before then it's not. So he says that he heard from the rash primo who said that there's two mas of there's a major of which is the mga that you have to have before anything. So you wake up in the morning the first thing you have to have is you have to have but there's also a of and then not only was in the basic elementary level of that comes before but he even had the comes after and afterwards. The truth is this that the brings from the primargo in what's the second to last it's says the if your comes at the end that means it comes after zahos and after zirus and nikos and afterus and precious and tahro And obviously it's a tremendous tremendous ma. You see from here you can't come to the you have to say it must be this is the basic level of who said that [clears throat] what do you mean It's literally now hard it is to get to it's not your image is holding by already close to how do you get to that it's I thought it's must be two the basic and then he explains what the two levels are there's two levels was first and then afterwards. Not only did he have the basic but he had the ultimate of regardless of this mission over here very hard gum and requires a lot of but you see there's a lot of hashtag rest of the story a lot of a lot of drama now the refer to idias as the that's the chosen rash doesn't say anything doesn't explain why it would be the chosen stating that is a rash refers to idas as she says one line because is like everything mentioned which is because it's mentioned because it's mentioned in the it's mentioned in the chosen so what makes it unique what makes it is what level it's the reason is is because we're just because it's aishna doesn't mean that that's how doesn't mean it's necessarily the way it is and it's for that reason it's not but the truth is that if you know the rest of the story of this idias there's a lot more to the story as to why it would be that idias is the chosen maka will have to wait for tomorrow to learn some of the rest of the story which we'll see ties in to like the great Right foot.