Bechoros 22

You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under their category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. Today's is and we will begin from the Mishna on the bottom of the a large clump of blood is a cake. So this is a large clump of blood. It looks like a piece of cake is we're concerned that there may be a vlad inside assuming that this is the would be the first vlad the first child of this would have kaducious. As a result you have no choice. they have to bury it because it's even though you don't see a child what you see is a said that we're concerned there may be a flood and if it's the it therefore may be a clump that has you have to bury it additionally if this animal is going to give birth to a child afterwards that child won't be thear because we're going to assume that this already had in it thear thus this animal moving forward is going to be so we're all familiar with the rule and no there not a lot of but the little bit that there are the little bit that there are are no the we've spoken about a lot of ra in the past what about if there's a what if argues with where the rulers so what takes precedence or So this is all rafishnas and there's a lot of interesting things to talk about but anytime you see a begins with the words so this is one of the few but it's also as a result to this that came out of this said two things number one because we're concerned that there's a lot inside if there's a it's the askar. Additionally, he said this animal moving forward is going to be because this was the stating that said that this is not in other words there's no right. So there's two obvious questions. If you're telling me that it's not you're telling me there's no concern that there's a because if there's a it would be and it would be so the question essentially is said in the in the we do assume that there's a then said it's not asks both questions number one a mighty why do you have to bury it burying it implies there's a flood if it's not then you're suggesting there's no says meaning really we're not concerned it's a and it's for that reason it's not if that's the case then why do you bury it because thing that is that this animal moving forward is going to be if you wouldn't bury the and then you would say the animals it would look like we're just bypassing the laws of Bkar so there's a marisian issue there's a issue we're worried of it looking like that we're not going to take the laws of into consideration with this animal. So it's for that reason we said let's bury it act as if it had kadushkar when in reality there's noar because we're not concerned that there's a but the gumar asks the obvious followup question if that's the case if you're telling me that in fact it is then you saying that it's a if that's the case what's going on over here if you're telling me that it's You're telling me that there's no and if you're telling me that both of those suggest that there is a lot. So the says you have to say you want to know if there's a vot or if there's not a for sure there's a predicated that if discharges we assume for sure there was a inside. If there was a vlad inside, that's where we start stating that that vlad being that it's it's submerged in blood and and whatever the animal discharged, we say that it's to the if that's the case, there shouldn't even be a that you should have to bury it. If that's the case, why do you have to bury it? It's only So the way you look at it is is we assume that there's a stating that it's for that reason your moving forward but as it relates to dealing with the kaduca of the vlad and as it relates to dealing with the tum of the vlad that you're not concerned with and the reason is because for that you have a so the bit works for the masa the works for the But that does not work to to say that it's not going to bear moving forward. So therefore is that because at the end of the day we assume that there was stating that it's not going to be because for that you have the B and the reason despite the fact that the B should work as well. as they said the same thing. This is if there's a shy of an animal or of a a woman is the sack where the fetus is inside the mother. So if you have a shill and a bias so we assume that there's a inside the and it's for that reason the bias is going to be assuming it's not a says not that the is not if there's a there must be a inside even if you don't see the is the bias is going to be talking says it's true if you see a for sure there's a but at the same time you could assume that the was bottle if it was it's not going to be That same concept is the concept that we're discussing right here. So you see how understood by virtue of the fact that he said what's the between they're both talking about with a with a fetus etc. But the real commonality between the two alis is this idea that if a child comes out of its mother whether it's an animal or whether it's a human being but it's ble to everything else that was discharged you would say the of either way we learned inn this is a seventh so one of the that govern the lord of is the fact that does not have an ability to be met. So the only time something could be or in any other way is if that to is exposed. But to the extent that the toal literally it's swallowed it's in something else is it doesn't have to be the context in that is a woman that loyal miscarried a child and the child is still inside her womb. So that child is tomasa but as long as it's inside the womb of its mother it's a tummala as a result it doesn't have to doesn't have the inability to be mama m or if it's an animal the question is at what point do we say that this child that's inside its mother does have an ability to be so you'd say when it's born the answer is no as soon as the starts opening up a little bit that would be enough for it to now be exposed to the point that we shouldn't treat it as toa and it would be able to be metamish when do we say that a is considered no longer meaning when do we look at the opening of the as so that it's not anymore says you need that the head of this fetus should be like the head of a a pika so a pika is a ball of yarn that was on the top of a spindle so if you're spinning yarn. So on top, picture the ball and the yarn is coming from it. So that's the ball that feeds the yarn that you're using. So when the head of the fetus is like a pa, that's when you have this, this ball of yarn, he said. So apparently there was the chassis yarn and there was the the yarn, right? Is literally a vertical line and a and a horizontal line. And the balls, these pikas were not the same size. The chassis was smaller and the Arab was bigger. So if you tell me, so you have to know is it the chassis which is a smaller share or is it the biggest? He said that this year of when we say that the opening of the womb of the mother is considered it's not do with the the p the head of the fetus being like a whether it's a pass or a pico but the sh is something else. The she is when you can see the used to say it's like a mule that when she kneels to urinate the nearest peak so Rashi says that a mule when she kneels to urinate she's she kneels a little bit more dramatically than does an ordinary I'm reading from because of the way she kneels her uterus opens up very very wide and you're able to see creases and folds inside her uterus. So when you can see those folds when the is so open that's when we view it as and it's at that point that if there's a dead fetus inside the animal or inside the woman it's at that point that the is going to be that it has an ability to its surroundings because it's no longer more on this I heard I heard two regarding one means and in the other means of I'm not sure which one is which. I person don't know what these are are said that there's two that relate to a right so you don't think of that usually has to do with there's two that are related to a one of them is the other one is and said I don't came from he had learned by the great and And he said, "I heard three picos is related to the so the pa that the people that would weave sacks for was a much bigger p." So I heard three related to one is the chassis and the the third one is the when he said oh in the name of shall meaning of so we asked we asked the question before is it the p of the chassi or is the p of the so this is where Robin said the name that if you're dealing with a woman means the pass, the smallest share. If you're dealing with a psal that's the biggest share. What's the p? That's a third completely unrelated learn. If somebody has a a clump of dirt that came from a bas is a field where you know for a fact there was once a a caver there or maybe even a basak forest, but it was plowed. It was destroyed. So as far as we know now, there's nothing there. is you have to be because you know once upon a time there was to there were and there was there was a lot of so you have to be that's known as that if you have from a so the price says or if it came from how How much do you have to have for it to be? So the is which by the way it's the same size as the seal that the used to use. They would tie with something. That seal that they used to tie the was the same as the And by the way, if you're still not sure what this is, a third. So the people in B when they would make casks, they would make covers for their casks. So the top part of the cast would slope upward and get narrower as it gets to the top, right? So you should be able to hold it with a handle. So that upper part was as big as this which is also the size of the in. So either way we have over here the is related to that's a in not something that often comes up. In fact they all said I heard two three related to a I wasn't even sure what the halas were. What are they related to? that related to the of which is a another with regards to the why are we talking about that over here because as we saw it's loosely related loosely related to the that we learned in our Mishna which is of an animal with miscarry is do we treat it as Bkar do we not treat it as Bkar the Mishna over of very long. If somebody buys from so is fish brine. So you have fish, you salt it, you add water, spices. We'll see. It's very important what the recipe is. We're probably not going to get to the recipe of the fish brine today. It's going to have to wait for tomorrow. But that actually lends itself to some faster rate. But either way, if somebody buys this fish brine from you can put it in contact with a mikvah and it's going to be so a few things. Number one in the times of was someone that was on. So the used to be very careful when it came to but wasn't so on it wasn't on a lot of things. wasn't soar says it's our master but one of the things that was unique about from aik perspective was that he wasn't when it came to so that reason if you buy something from an it's so you have to deal now with the ramifications not only did he give but also is this so anytime you buy something from there's a tumyra consideration that you need to calculate that's number one number Two is that water may become of course if becomes there's a way to be now this is already is the ultimate how would you be m you put it in a mikvah say how you the answer is something called which means you take the water that's tummy you put it in contact with a mikvah and the is that by putting the water in contact with a mikvah the water somehow becomes tummy Rashi over here in the sugi explains a little bit the lumbness of how that works but that's not really our we don't have to go into that but that's the is that if you have that comes in contact with a mikvah becomes the third thing that we need as an introduction to this and that is sear fish brine meaning the the discharge that comes out of the fish when you're salting it and when you're making the brine that in of itself doesn't have an ability to become tummy. So if you're making fish brine, so you're going to have a recipe. There's going to be water. There's going to be the or za this za that comes out of the of the d. The za doesn't have an ability to become. You don't have to mire it. It can't even become the may itself does have an ability to become because but at the same time there's a way to be mired as well. The way to be retired is with hash as I said in the name of notic this is who lived in the times of who was grandson but either way said if somebody and he's concerned that it might be he wants to be so he said there's a very simple do let it come in contact with a mikra and at that point it's already going to be said why if this If it's so we look at it as if we look at it as you could be and if it's in which case doesn't work because the of was only said but if it's then it's not a problem can't come to me anyways it's either Mayan or it's if it's Mayan is going to work and if it's then the Mayan then there's no am I doing everything is going to be fine. But he continued he said I know what you're going to tell me. There's one possibility over here. What if it's but there's therefore at least. So aren't you worried about the so like we said it's not an issue. This was only said with regards to if you buy from and you want to eat it and the way you're going to eat it is by taking your bread and dipping your bread into it. In the times of kazal everything was dips. That's why you would make a hami and it would p everything else in the suda because the way people ate once upon a time was everything centered around the bread. Today it's different. Most low carb diets don't allow for lafas. But the point is once upon a time that's the way people ate and that's the way people ate. That's the that you make because that was the part of the so if you're eating this fish brine the way people eat it which is that's where you have this you could buy the from do the it's okay you don't have to worry about but let's say you're going to take this fish brine and you're going to cook it now then the is it's not okay this said in the name of is not going to work you know why Because what happens when you cook it? You're going to stick it in a pot. There's going to be water. If there's going to be water. So what was aim initially now because of all the water that you have in the is going to change the ratio. It's going to change the proportions and now you're going to end up with May. If you're going to end up with royim, therefore you're going to have a a problem because the mi of initially didn't bother me cuz the mi of was to the but now that I have now ready it's going to be initial. So again what's what's the what's the is as follows may has hash does not have. So when you have a voice of if it's and a m of and you put it in contact with a mikvah the m of is not benefiting from the hash because it's bled to the t is not benefiting from the hash because hash was never said with regards to the so there was no hash that was p on this now it's not a problem because being that the is immune anyways so it's to the is not to so the is not to so it's not a problem but That's all true as long as the mime is unmute. But what happens if you're going to add water? So once you add water now the mime is already going to be arrived. If the mime is going to be arrived now the bit of the to the m doesn't work anymore. If the bit doesn't work now the mind needs ashaka. It didn't have ashaka. What do you mean it had ashaka? No. When it had ashaka it was the being that it was the never worked for the mind. It only worked for the so it never had ashak. It's not a m anymore. As a result you're going to have a problem. You have to that you bought from the name of this wholeish. So says the said that's true but it only works if you're using the fish as a dip. But if you're not using it as a dip, you're using it to cook with. So then the water that you're going to add to this tarova is is going to flip the proportions. At that point, what does that mean? It's going to be it's going to awaken the sleeping giant, the sleeping minority that of is now going to the new and as a result you're going to have a problem. So again was sitting and he was saying over this told he says I don't understand when the was in this voice was why don't we say that at that point it's over the story's over that was there is no anymore so what are you going to tell me now it was what do you mean it was it's gone makes it commandless on me so makes it commandless on Meaning what is saying and was saying over in the name of Rabia is a when you have a bit when there's au of the still there and the mid can always come back to haunt you at some future day and you always have to be cognizant of the proportions to make sure that it didn't switch because just because I have a right now doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to be that way forever. Abaya argued that I don't necessarily see it that way. said that once the mu this bottle at this point it should be over. So who cares if later you're going to add water to it and later that May which is a me is going to be a you're going to say oh the may never had because when there was it was bottled to it. No no no once it's but it should never be a problem. But you don't hold that way. If that's the case, had you learned the following aishna in the fifth par of if a saw of truma falls into a 100 saw of is before we learn this mishna just again a little bit of an introduction again this is not a long but there's a lot of information here is that ordinarily if you have a voice it's a Soon according to some well you would need of that's as it relates to an ordinary of this of if you have 60 times that's when you say there are some exceptions to the rule there are certain areas in where is not is not you more than one of them is trum is that if truma is with things that are not trumin You would need a 100 times of the in order to have a that's so whereas for example is when it comes to so you need 100 times in order for it to be that's the first there's another with regards to and that is anytime you have au of chuma and a propitar you have 100 times the truma it's a 100% has perfect it's but there still another and that is you have to take out one from this meaning ordinarily if you have a you have a everything becomes the rush could you eat it all at once could one p person eat all of it stuff but that's all with regards to an ordinary B where you can for sure eat everything. There's nothing to talk about. When it comes to a B of and is you're not allowed you have to remove one S. You have to remove one S. What do you do with that one S? You give it to a C. That's why. So you give it to a C who's allowed to eat. What's the reason for it? It's again not something we have to go into right now. Maybe tomorrow, but it's less related to the isum. It's more related to the component because being that Truma belongs to the it's quote unquote. So you can't just go ahead and rely on a to take away money from somebody, right? But you can't just go ahead and and take somebody else's thing through. So works for the for that is going to work. But as relates to taking away the for that it doesn't work and it and it's for that reason you have to remove one s which corresponds to the s of trauma even though when you remove that one s there's no reason to assume that it's really trauma if anything parish muba parish says that there's only a one in 101 chance that it's truma so chances are it's not the truma but we treat it as truma you give it to the ken and the kayen does with it whatever he needs to do this was a little bit different this Mishna the Mishna is discussing Not a but rather this saw of truma wasn't just ordinary truma. It was also to add insult to injury. It's truma which in the context of a zar is a bad thing. Usually truma means it's kesh but when a zar has trauma it's a problem. But in addition to that it was also to and this adds a few unique characteristics to the shila. One when you look at the taru is you're not only ding whether the taras has in it whether it's or there's also a component. Is this to or is this? That's number one. Number two you when you remove that one s of truma. It's not as simple as just remove the saw and give it to a kayen because a c is allowed to eat truma but a kay is not allowed to eat truma toa. And being that he's not letting so you're going to give it to a what's a going to do with it? So you're going to assume it's you're not allowed to assume it's because at the end of the day you it might be for him to go ahead and burn it which is usually what a would do withha is also an issue. Why? because maybe it's so for that reason this posed a unique challenge in number one you have to d the itself not only from a a true perspective but also from a the higher perspective and number two what you have to d is the fact that you're going to go ahead and give it to a now what exactly is a going to do with it so what's the what do you do with this you have says that what you should do is you should remove the one that's why You always do when you have a tar. So anytime you have a tar of truls versus the trum, you're always going to remove one s. You're going to remove one s here as well. But whereas ordinarily what would you do with the you would give it to a k. You can't give it to a because can't do anything with it. The k can't eat it because it might be true. The cayenne can't burn it because it might be true. We're not relying on the b for this for some reason. But the point is is that we're going to remove this one. And being that we don't know what the status is from the perspective, you can't even give it to the you just let it rot. It is what it is. But once you remove it, the rest of the is going to be fine. No, there's no reason to remove it. What we say is is that it becomes bottle. That one saw is bottle is and the coen is allowed to eat it and the rest of the as if it was in other words according to you have to remove the one s and that one s you can't give to the as it because the k himself doesn't know what to do with it according to the you're going to remove the one s because you always remove the saw but at the same time we're going to assume that the saw that be removed is for sure and as a result the will be able to eat it. So the is between and just to be clear is not whether you're going to remove the saw. You're for sure going to remove the saw. The question is what are you going to do with that one s that you're going to remove? According to you're gonna remove it and you're just going to let it rot according to the no is means says it's bottle and you can eat it together with the with the rest of the stating that even though said that you're allowed to eat all 101 s over here as if it's but there is an important caveat and that is number one you can eat it dry you can toast it. We'll see what that means. Or you can knead it, but only with Or if you want, you can knead it with water, but you have to make very small out of it. The point is shouldn't be one area that has it. What's the reason for this? The reason for this is is because don't want this to ever be able to become. We'll see why in a second, but they don't want it to be able to become. So even though they're telling you you're allowed to eat all 101 sala, you have to eat it in a way where it's never going to become. So just don't add water to it. If you don't add water to it, it's going to be fine. So either just cook it dry or toast it without any water or use which is not or if you're going to use water make it so small that it's which is the minimum shift for in the first place. But we want to distance himself as far as possible from the price continued. What was the revel the was only with regards to the ones but as it relates to the other hundreds everybody agrees you could eat but as a whole you can eat the hund just the one that you remove that we are concerned might be might be so no one's allowed to eat it not even the accord you can eat all 101 but those other hundred that you could eat according to what's same exact it's the meaning you have to make sure that it doesn't come to a position where it's possible for it to become and said what's the reason for this what are we worried about like why are you worried about it maybe becoming what's the issue the issue is that there was a that became ble into the so became ble the whole was 100 times like what's the problem should be 100% fine and certainly we're the one of that you were worried about we ostensively removed right what was the whole point remove one so according to it's all it's all so what's the issue why you worried about it becoming what's the problem with this tar according to rebar it certainly shouldn't be a problem because rebel even said that when you remove the one you assume that that's the one that's so there's there's mish no over here so if there's no to why is it a said, "What's the reason for it?" You know what we're worried about? We're worried that someone's going to look at this. He's going to say, "Oh, it's all right." He's going to take now. That's a small. It's a shish of it's a six of us of and he's going to be he's going to mix it together with plus meaning a little bit more than of this right here. He's going to say let me be says right away how could you do this 101 you're not allowed to do that. Okay, but for right now this is what this person's going to do. So he's going to take aim from somewhere else. He's going to put it together with this taru thinking that he can go ahead and now make a bit of the problem over here is that this taru hasn't it a little bit of tommo. It's true that was bottle but the little bit of tum that was bottle never went away. It's still there. It's waiting to be awakened if something's going to come now to be now that you're going to add to the mix. So the little bit of that you're going to add to the mix is going to be the little bit of that's there and you'll say you're going to awaken this sleeping minority. This sleeping giant is now going to wake up again. The point is what do you see from here? You see that there's a concept of you don't just say oh the little dam that's there is gone. You don't have to ever think about it again. No it's not true. It's something that can haunt you at some future date. And if something's going to happen later that's going to change the ratio, the proportions of this tar at that point, it's something that you're going to definitely have to take into consideration. Again, we had a shila between they were discussing seir. Seir is fish brine that you buy from an this fresh brine was made up of the za of the dog. What comes out of the dog and was made up of water. You bought it from you're concerned that it may be to you're not sure. May be tom. it may be so said over in the neighborhood you didn't see that there's an there's a way to bypass this whole of issue it's going to be fine he said why this is either if it's then it's not because is not even there's nothing to talk about it's a mood point and if it's going to work stating that said it's not so simple says you know why because maybe it's means that there is a so that when you did Hasha the hashaka didn't work but it was okay because it didn't have to work because tears anyway is not mabo but being that there's a little bit of water there what will happen if later you're going to add more water now that you add more water the water is not going to be the mut anymore now the water is going to be the if the water is going to be the so now already you have if you have may now the tarus will become to so if the taru will become you're using may that's a problem what are you going to tell me the hash that I did the hash was never ash because when I did the was bottled and it's not on so essentially I now have a situation where the may is the where there was no hash it's not an easy as a result there should be a problem that was what said so we're discussing this and said I I don't hear I don't hear what is saying because essentially what he's saying is that even though at the time that you did the was bled to but If you're going to add water later now all of a sudden it's going to be a problem right it's a big think about it so you have a is right now that's right the the on it says it's because it's not you can add a little bit of water now all of a sudden it's going to become like how'd that happen how does something become comes in contact with an with a sher with a maze with a za that's how something becomes tame now you I added water you literally added a little bit of water you follow the directions says add water and now by adding water all All of a sudden it became a had a major issue with that. It doesn't make any sense. How could you add water and suddenly create? Okay. The lumbus is there was always water and the water was always it was an amat now that the proportions change. It's not an amat anymore. This is the lumbus that we're discussing. Very you can hear this way. You can hear that way. But kind of but this is not a sh that's really up for debate. This is not this should not be an discussion. This is a reish. So we're discussing a not such straightforward case of which is when you had a and it was into 100 of that was. So ordinarily when trum is within you need 100 that's fine. You remove one you give it to the and everything is good. But over here was so here there was a a little bit of a a little bit of a different shud when you remove that one. What's the one? Can you treat it as if it's because of the or no? You have to be worried that maybe it's maybe it's maybe it's we're not sure what to do with it. Said we don't touch this. According to everything is going to be fine. But as it relates to the part that you could eat according to the all 101 according to 100 out of the 101 with regards to the that's not that's the other part the easier part of the as it relates to the otherund 101 according to the what do you do with that is you make sure it doesn't come in contact with water don't let it become to you know why because there may be a little bit of tom in here who cares if there's a little bit of to it was ba the to you're worried about the the tuma was ble the to certainly ble I don't even think any shish. So what's the problem over here? I say oh you know what the problem is? I'll tell you what the problem is. What happens if you're going to add to later thinking that oh this is all very nice. Yeah this is of here. So you're going to add your toil. Okay. But the point is you're going to go ahead create a new little bit of will be awakened and now you're going to flip the proportions. It's it's it's not it's not up to the debate told it's that it flips. It's not true. It's very different. It's fundamentally different. He said in this case what's the concern? The concern is he going to bring more thinking I'll be this with this. So over there the that's being to the t that could be but in our case what we're discussing with that you're pouring good cold kosha water into this taru over here it's not to how in the world is being moer over there is that had in it a little bit of to that was ble IT JUST CAME IN CONTACT WITH CAN BE moermo tahra does not have the ability to be moer tomo Exile. So it's interesting when you think of the of the sugis of so the beginning of the third parag is not usually what comes to mind. Maybe you'll think of and sug primarily in but the truth is there's many many that are tucked away in these gar here as it relates to I think it's maybe over the next day or two to try to speak out a few so let's just start with one and that's a beautiful that Rabbi Binenfeld shared with me and that is that we spoke the other day about the rush. The rush is in the of where the rush said that even though if you have a suffic but does not have the ability to be pushed the suffic to the extent that we're going to say that there's no suffic anymore after the even though in we follow the 100% we mentioned the says not even allowed to go. It's a question of being if you say I don't want to be says to go with the there's no but the point is but the point is at the end of the day despite the fact that says you follow but at the same time we're still going to be open-minded to the point that we're going to acknowledge that what we have in front of us is a suffic and it's for that reason the rush that said a very big that anytime there's a that you need vi and sufficed even if you have a ro cannot give you vi to answer the if you had a bunch of animals and one of the one of the animals that you counted already from now jumped into the of the animals that all the animals are part of you don't say the cash is why why don't you say that that one animal that jumped in is now going to be the says the rush is Because can't tell me I can't know for sure that when the animal goes that this animal right now is what do you mean there's a roy doesn't create v says that I it's okay I can eat it I can follow it says that she's married that she's not married that he's alive that he's not alive but in terms of does not have an ability to be so we mention that brings and that is that it's from different places that you do use to be the one that we ask is this every is that if an animal's a tra it doesn't count for how do you know if an animal's a tra or not I mean the only way to really know is to cut open the animal and start doing what you have to do the ter says you assume how could you assume re I thought doesn't work so he mentioned the the of and that is between Aruba the Isaac and Aruba the By Aruba the Isaac over there this rush was said and that is that when you have a a doesn't have a to create the less maybe that's something that's going to be different I'll just share with one beautiful and that is something that's also you have a whe you have to make a you don't make a the truth is that's not entirely true it's only true by a that's a but that's so example which is so if you have a if you made over there in the end of so brings the says that that it's actually awesome to go ahead and make that what happens if you have a spec or whether you have to make a a or not you're not sure if you and even if you didn't eat a mean you have a scenario where it's not a suffic if you have to make a it's a spec a case it's a that you have to make a says it says what if I don't have one that I have to make a I have that I have to make a it's a it's a it doesn't matter even if it's a sorry Benfeld asked that we know the test says what's that by you go if it's a fake you go so if you ask the man on the street what's he going to tell you why is it that you go he's going to say because it's just like a diluted suffix where the suffic is it's one suffic there's one sad that it's so for such a suffic but if there's tooth stud that it's mutter when it's tooth st that's already different tooth That's like a more diluted suffic and by such a diluted suffix over there you go. That's the stating that says a major this he says the reason is not because of the suffic it's the same if it's one suffic or if it's two spakers. In fact, you'd have to start getting involved in percentages and statistics, right? When you talk about a sopha, both both stim are a small stud statistically speaking. But yes, that is not the lumbus of really should be treated like a regular. What's the reason you go? It works with the D of because when you have a specul essentially what you have is one that it's a problem and you have to say that it's you have explained the a little bit differently but it works with this and it's for that reason it goes and if you look there and it's the understood like he gets involved in We're talking about no because fake is a it's a it's not just a a way of saying it. It's it's a real understood that it works right. If that's the case, what's in this says that if you have a you look at it as a sophicus, why is it a bra? If the together is you look at it as so it's not a suffic anymore. You have that you have to make a if you have you have to make a right. What's the dish? Why shouldn't you make a bra? Look how I have a over here. And if you have arrived, the RA should be okay. Axe faker starts off with a suffic. Of course, we understand that that that's why it's a it's a it's right. This is like a sufficial suffic. It's ava. Of course, a spec starts as a suffic. But when we say, what are we essentially saying? We're saying that even though it's a suffix, it's a spec, but at the end of the day, I have a and should be the suffix. So post facto after I implement the that fa you can rely on I shouldn't have a suffic anymore. So what started as a faker should end up not being a suffic at all because every fake is mut it's mut because of if has an ability to create vic anymore. So why is this a bra say if you're not sure if you have a to make a what's the you don't you don't make a bra what if I have tooth that I have to make a doesn't matter still I still says look at it as a what why if it's a you have to have to make a is telling me to make a so now to make to make why shouldn't I make a going to say the rush the rush that even after I have arrived me suffic it's still viewed as a suffic so it's true I have a that I'm allowed to use which technically should create a mat of but at the end of THE DAY IT'S STILL SUFFIC IF IT'S STILL suffic it's for that reason that I won't be able to make a fellow that's but either way just to digress for a moment with something that's a little bit in the end of If somebody has a fo to make not you don't make the sh from this so this many years ago so in sim he asks he asks many on this mission and two of them are very much as follows if somebody forgets to count one night so what's you continue counting but you count without a why because there's a a suffic whether each day's a mitzvah or whether it's it's all one big mitzvah and sad that they're individual mitzvah just because I forgot one night doesn't mean I don't have a mitzvah to count the next night but sad that it's one big mitzvah once I miss one night I'm out it's not to me so I can't be m the mitzvah so what do you do when you have such a suffik so you do the mitzvah you don't make the as it relates to the mitzvah it's a suffic mitzvah of course you do it as relates to the brahas says what would be if somebody has a suffic somebody's not sure if you counted so you talk you can't remember did I count or or did I not count it says the let's say he's not sure so what's he can't with So if you have a suffic can't remember you're supposed to count says why because maybe you really counted the imple and even on the side that you didn't count maybe every day it's a separate and as a result BEING THAT IT'S A faker this to make a what do you do if you have a you RELY ON FAKER IT'S NOT brokus anymore because that's what I have a suffic is different than a suffic whatever the sex faker tells you to do. So if I have a that explains something that's not terribly where you have that somebody's not sure if he counted with a not continue counting with a what do you mean it's a suffic I'm not sure yeah but it's cuz according to some anyways could count with a bra we're not sure if that is like those or not and you only have a suffix fake you're allowed to count what do you mean I thought by you go like the said another what happens if somebody didn't count sphere at night everybody knows you didn't count at night what do you do during the day you count but again you count without you're supposed to count during the day without what's the right you ever think about that what's why are you counting without a you have a mitzvah to count then you should count with a if there's no mitzvah to count then you should count without So what's this idea of counting but counting without is very simple because you can count during the day it's not clear if you could count it's according to the pkin that you can count sphere during the day doesn't have to be it could be during the day according to the whole that is only then you can't make a so what we do is again it's a suffic we're not sure does it mean that it's a suffic we can't but we count without a look to mur Okay, just read it inside says for that reason that's says another everybody knows another everybody else. So what happens you forgot to count that night. So the Gabby made a clock should have forgot to count whoever didn't count. Oh, you forgot to count spir of course you know how to do it without what do you do that night now already you're allowed to count with what's the we're about to learn right here every kid knows but the underlying this not everybody knows so what's the so why why moving forward now can I count with according to the why couldn't I count during the day with because maybe I miss because maybe is only so why the next night am I allowed to count Maybe I miss and if I miss somehow right most simple question in the world if you didn't count that night you can count the next day but without a why because according to you could only be you can't be sphere anymore so how am I going to count with a bra stay in that the next that night already I'm allowed to count with a bra why am I allowed to count with a bra maybe I was only allowed to count at night but right when I counted this morning I make a bra because maybe you're only allowed to count the night. If I'm only allowed to count the at night then it comes out I missed. So if I missed I shouldn't be able to count with a bra. So what's the difference? If I miss completely then you don't count with a anymore. If you missed at night but you counted during the day then you could count with if I missed at night and I counted during the day being that when I counted during the day I didn't make you see I'm concerned that maybe it's not really spir just like I can't make now why should I be able to make that night? What's the answer? So he can't he doesn't explain why but explains why he says you know why because now it's already you know what the difference is says to difference is very simple that when you miss it's one suffic if you forgot to count a entire 24-hour period you miss the whole So how come you can't count the next day? Cuz according to some py according to some py skin you missed and if you miss it's a problem as a result you're out. But over here it's not one suffic it's a spec this tooth st him that maybe I'm allowed to count with a bra number one maybe counting at night maybe counting during the day counts pun intended if that's the case. So I didn't miss and even in Tim that I did miss there are that hold that you're allowed to miss and it's still considered one in other words when I didn't count at all it's one suffic if I did count I just counted during the day then it's a there's two stardom that I'm what are the two number one maybe I didn't miss cuz I counted during the day number two maybe the is that even if I miss I'm allowed to count with a so for that reason it's going to be okay meaning when I miss completely for 24 hours It's a one suffix. It's what's the shila? The shil is is a one big bra or is it not is it one big mitzvah? Is it not one big mitzvah? When I count when I want to count during the day, it's also one suffic. I want to count out during the day. But when I want to count at night, but I count it during the day, then it's two cuz now we're ready to start them to say number one, it could be every day it's his own mitzvah. And number two, maybe when I counted during the day, it counted and as a result, I didn't miss. If it's a you're supposed to make a bottom line even by that works doesn't make it not and that's why you have the very but at the same time we seem to have a steer in the you have the in two places in a tough pay test a little both related to that everybody's familiar with every day type during anyways and that is is that when there's a fake and you do make so it's something that requires he says some majorus far is to answer these cases and other caches that he asks but we'll