Bechoros 2

Today's is and we are in the beginning of a new today's being learned as a sha for devor. So the topic of not surprisingly is the idea of the bkar. Now from a perspective the laws of can really be divided into three groups. The Tyra says that in the event that somebody has a kosher animal that gives birth to a firstborn zakar male that animal has to be given as a gift to a cyen. The cen then has to take it and bring it to as a carbon. The only time that is true is in the event that the animal was kosher. The Torah says and it's regarding those three of that [snorts] this is going to apply. There's another idea of that involves a non-coosher animal, one specific non-coosher animal, and that is in the event that a [clears throat] a donkey gives birth to a firstborn zakar there to the laws of are going to apply. Now, the way they apply is different. The reason it's different is because it's obvious that this can't be given to a koen and ultimately be put on the misbeh what then do you do? So the Tyra says there are two options. One option is you could be poet you could redeem the with a take the and give it to the co. It's interesting that in the event that you choose that option when the coin receives the se that is going to be it's not going to be but there's an option called where you take the you of the onto a the now goes to the ken your is regular you can do whatever you want to do with that thera says that in the event that you don't want to do for whatever reason. Then there's a mitzvah that's known as which in English means we behead the and there's a whole andis that talk about what the status of that is going to be postifa but the point is that as it relates to a firstborn kamar there are two ways that you can go you can go the pigion route you can go the arifa route in fact kazal compare the mitzvah of as it relates leads to a to the concept of it's actually a also is an idea very different but there's two possibilities in the event etc. one is the other is when it comes to the of there's two options one is the other one is going to be and then finally the third category within the world of is the one that we're most familiar with that's one that's very much and that is the of that in the event that somebody has a firstborn there's a mitzvah to be that by giving five slum to a as it relates It's going to discuss all of the affforementioned. It's going to discuss the of that gives to a firstborn where the Tyra says go give it to the and then the C has a whole obligation. He has a responsibility to bring it as a carbon. We're going to discuss in of a firstborn where the terrorist has these two mitzvah that are nega one the other one and then finally is also the talks about all the different of it's interesting the starts which with which one of these three starts with the most obscure of the three and that is the firstborn where there's an option of pidion an option Rashi says it's the first Rashi that the reason we start with the mitzvah of the as opposed to you would think if anything if you want to go the behem route you would start with the or the or the is simply being that the is related to the much smaller than the is related to the kosher animal all the big are going to come on the shif side so let's just address what is shorter and then afterwards we'll spend the majority of the maka dealing with the of as it relates to the kosher animal additionally to the laws of of but this is not the introduction to the maka this is just setting up exactly what is going to look like if you think about the concept of the bkar it's very interesting it's interesting because it's actually one of the first mitzvah that kai Israel got as a nation We received the mitzvah of Bkar before we stood at hari. In fact, the first time the yidden were told about the concept of kadushkar and mitzvah that result from kadushkar was when the yidden was still in par. This is If you fast forward 13, this is of parishes. It is going to be going to take you into the land of like he swore to you and to your conquer the land. You should take every pet every and you should give it to that's a fancy way of saying and really the we just read encapsulates the entire setup tokar and And is clearly saying that has to be given to in other words it's as a carbon that's what you do with the first category that we talked about you have the proverbial that's what you do with the second category that we mentioned the and then finally That's the term mentions that as well. Now the P continues and the says if your child is going to ask you what's this all about you should tell him did not want to send the Jews out. So what did was he killed all the for that reason you want to know what this is all about? It's because when you left killed all the and it's for that reason all the now are going to have kadusha. And then finally the last compar you should take this and you should literally put it as an ice. You should bind it to your hand. You should put it in between your eyes. So the of the story of the traces itself all the way back to and the gives us a very clear defined reason as to why it is that we have this mitzvah. It's related to another very interesting thing about the mitzvah of Bkar which brings out how unique it is is that the parish of Bkar is in our fillin. The tomb is made up of four paras of and then is and is the we just read these are literally the mitzvah of it's actually ironic that the parish of kadeshly called bkar which sounds like is the parish of the bakar is not the parish of the bakar talks all about it starts off mentioning the you have to wait several until you get to that is really the parish that talks about all the of the but the bottom line is that the mitzvah of bkar is featured very very prominently in the fillain now what's fillain fillin on the simplest level is there are certain ideas that are so critical. There's certain ideas that we have to be so mindful of that we literally have to have them on us at all times. So therefore we take these ideas and we put them in our arm and then we put them between our eyes and our right all these different that this talk about as it relates to the film. So there's certain ideas now that's in volume that's mitzvah but included in the things that are in the in fact it's a par the fourth par of the parish of is all about the mitzvah so is so prominent that it literally made it into I'll just share with you one beautiful that theel speaks out and with that we'll start the maka the barbell says that If you you break down all the mitzvah that were given to us in that relate to you're going to see there's three groupings. I'm picking up here mid paragraph that are going to remember there's going to be three that they're going to have to have in mind right which means you can't eat it all the come from the heading of matzah and the reason we have these mitzvah is for the first zikarin zikarinus mitim like the Torah talks about the second that we have is and that's a way to remember it's also all the things that happened on the night it's and the third that we have is it's the fact that And that and this group is doing what he does best in the world of but he says if you do a and you break down all the different that we have in parishes by all the mitzvah there's going to be three groupings. There's the matzah related mitzvah a lot of them and that's all related to the and then there's the carbon right that whole of the and that's a way to remember the fact that the all the events that took that night and then there's a specific sh there's a specific mention within all those different that took place we have to highlight the Indian and makus get highlighted in the it's the idea the concept of now the truth is when we learned the not so long ago and then so we spoke out from the London from and from that you find that is not just another gets disproportionately highlighted and emphasized in the world of the says this that when a person's every day he has to be to the point that if a person would not be he wouldn't be and really you see it throughout but you see it in think of that we say by so I mean you would that covers everything that encapsulates whatever you need to encapsulate but you get a special shadow and it's based on that they have to be masquer in the shabas we go through all the different things Why do you have to give a shout out to Makus? You don't mention you don't remember the you don't mention the rest of the but as it relates to that already we do and that already talk about different reasons but the bottom line is this brings it out so strongly there's three that we make in the world of there's the mat related there's the carbon pes related and then there's makus makus begget its own category of zako and that's manifest in an entire in the is which again we set up is made up really of three different but is there's a concept of is that when left the 10th the climax of the makus was this was something that was so significant that said I want you to remember it not just remember it shout I wanted to literally be bound to your So this is something that you're always going to remember. You're always going to remember the fact that I took you out of and specifically obviously it still requires a little bit of why is it so important? It's not enough to say something that we're going to get back to but for now we have to learn We have to get into the kishkas. We mentioned already that Rashi says that from the three categories of the one that the starts with is a firstborn which is unique in that not giving it to the and is not taking it then and putting it on the and bringing it as a a carbon but rather you have a mitzvah to either be and give the which he will treat us or to do the the very obscure unique mitzvah of Arias. And on that note, we begin with a Mishna. A Mishna which interestingly is going to give us examples of when the laws of right that's a synonym for the laws of do not apply. Which by the way, we've mentioned this over the years several times that it's interesting that you have misses and certainly many many many many procas that begin discussing an idea and instead of doing it in what you would think would be a very systematic way. Let me tell you what this is and then at some point we'll get to the exclusions. We start with the loopholes. We start with the exclusions and then we work our way backwards to actually figure out what exactly this is all about. One of the great examples which is is where are the laws of discuss it's the third per of how does the peric startle start with azle the cabal already addressed this issue but the bottom line is this is something that you very very often find this is something that was done when the shas and the shish mishna was set up this Mishna is a perfect example so instead of starting off learning about the laws of pigeon pak or the of the and what type of is and what the definition of is etc etc. We're going to start with uh as if we know enough about it that we could start hearing a little bit the exceptions to the rule. And on that note, if somebody purchases the of says the case is where there was no he owned a and she was pregnant and goes and he says I want to buy the rights. I want to acquire the Uber. He doesn't know if the Uber is going to be a zer or an but whatever it is he wants to buy it or in the event somebody owns an animal and he goes and he sells the to which the mission says by the way FYI you're not allowed to do that FYI is a critical FYI because it's going to be the topic of today's and tomorrow's as we're going to see additionally if somebody owns together with Or if somebody was awan, he was in some sort of business relationship with where the deal was as follows. This female donkey, he hires a yid to go and work with it and to breed it. And as part of the arrangement, the deal is that any offspring that's going to be born, there's going to be some sort of between the person that owns the and the operator, who in this case is the orab or if somebody does it in the reverse where there's a yid that owns this, and now he hires this non-Jew, same arrangement where the Yid is going to be the one that's going to own the mother, but there's going to be some sort of partnership in terms of how they're going to divide any others that are going to be born in all of these cases there is no in the event that a child is born and it's so the law is should apply and the reason is it says in the and we learn from there that to the extent is any of in this is the laws of are not going to be in place. So the first of is that the only time the laws of apply is in the event that it's if however there's involved as in that event the laws of are not going to apply. Now what's the definition of being involved? Mishna actually gave five definitions of it. One is where the owns the mother and the is owned by the isrol or vice versa where the isrol owns the mother and owns the orim they own everything 50/50 or in the event that there was some sort of owner operator type arrangement where in the first case the owns the mother gave the mother over to a yid to work with it And as part of his compensation, he's going to have a of the but it's that owns the mother and the other of the or in the reverse case where it's the that owns the mother. He gave the the mother to go ahead and operate with where the is going to maintain ownership of the mother and going to have part of the in all of those five situations. What's the obvious question? Why do you need five cases to tell me one? Why do you need to tell me the same five times? The say is unique in all of these uh different cases household eat because had the only told me the first case that if somebody buys an of and you're going to tell me in that situation where the owns the mother owns the is the laws of are not going to apply. I would have thought that maybe the reason over there the laws of do not apply is because the is bringing this but in a situation where it's the reverse where he sells the in which case he's being I would have thought that even though it's true it says in the therefore there's not going to be any laws But maybe the rabbon should have implemented a because you shouldn't go and take an animal from that reason the Mishna had to say in both cases is not going to be the laws of that I would know if you only told me one case but you should know even that are not going in and they're not constant and again what's the is the I would have told if I buy I'm bringing it. So why would you be kind to someone for doing something so noble but if you sell it you're being from there you would think maybe that's a reason to give a that we're not going to do it. Now what does it mean that when somebody buys the of and to the contrary if you sell it rationally says that the kusha that we're talking about over here is shabas. We'll see this is going to feature very prominently in the of the [snorts] is obligated to keep shabas but not just the his animals as well. It's what's known as doesn't have to keep shabas. Obviously, the animal doesn't either have to keep shabas. If you buy an animal from so the animal that you just brought is going to be it's going to be a Sabbath observant. So if that's the case, you just brought him into the world of Shabas. If you go ahead and you sell an you go in the reverse. So this which you know would have been shabas. So now all of a sudden it's not going to be and that's the kadusha that's going on over here. Ty says what the doesn't have to keep shabas if I own so my extends itself to to my as well. The fact that I sold it out to is being says I I can't even process what it is Rashi is is saying here. says I think the more pasha when we talk about the kusha in the context of an animal it means one thing especially in this it means that's the kadusha that we're referring to if somebody goes and somebody buys an from now if the is going to be so now this is going to have children let's say it has a child that's a z oh the child that it's going to have that would be a zar so that would already be nickn to the world of that you're being potentially assuming it's in a has a child it's going to be if you go ahead and you sell to it turns out to be ana has and you owned it that now would have been included in the laws of but because it belongs to it's not going to be so the depending on whether you're buying or selling says has nothing to do with what it has to do with is the of today and that is kaducious but either way says the that's why I need the first two cases from a diser perspective once I know one I would know the other but I would have had a then maybe in the event that I'm if I'm maybe that should trigger a and based on that shouldn't be so oh I'm not no you are okay so why do we need the third case the reason the mentioned the case where you have in the entire animal right this is even in the motherly why do I need that that's coming we're going to see in today's he has a that in the event that there actually is wanted to say like that is going to be why do I need the fourth case so what was the fourth case the fourth case is where somebody made a business arrangement an owner operator type arrangement with owns this female donkey and finds a that's the operator and he says yeah I'm going to work with this and the arrangement is that if there are any profits we're going to share so the owns the mother the is essentially is a in the you should know your potter says the why do I need that case. What's the beer and why do I need that case? Right? What's the beer in the this is the first case of the in fact because in the first case of the you own it 100% being that the owns the mother. So the is you're going to be so certainly in this case where the goya owns the mother and even mix should be why do I need a case of soar says you don't because this is identical to the first case the reason we mention the fourth case is because we want didn't mention the fifth case now the fifth case is already a little different what's the fifth case where the yid owns the mother and now signed a deal with an operator So the is going to own the mother and is only going to own that's already a case that we feel we want to say. So once I mention the case, we mention the case as well, right? This is poetic symmetry. This is easy. But says between me and you right, I don't think I need that case either. Why? It's back of the envelope arithmetic. If you think about it, the fifth case is really the second and the third case combined. Because the fact that the fact that you have a situation where the id owns the mother that in of itself is not necessarily a a reason to say that there's aar because that was the second case of the where the owns the mother and sold the being that the owns the so you're not going to be okay you'll say but maybe it's different why is it different because I'm at least the so it's true that has ownership in the but only mix ownership At the end of the day I also have mixes ownership something that was over here. So based on that okay but I know that already from the case of even case number five I know because it's a combination of cases two and three says I hear it's I still need to know this mean I would have thought being that in this fifth case really belongs to and even in the he's avas why do you want to is also in this case. You would have thought you should make a and you should say that the has to be because you may go ahead with another one. That's the being that in this case the Y owns the entire mother and the also has ownership in the so this is very very very similar to your classic case where the owns everything and there's no at all. So you would had a maybe we should make a again that maybe people will think that the laws of for whatever reason don't apply. The bottom line is that's why I need all five cases. I need a case where the yid bought the uber from the a case where the yid sold the to the where the yid and then where there's this owner operator relationship where one owns the mother and mixes of the that's the owner the operator only owns the other mixes of the and whether the owner is the whether the owner is the and either way so before we start the next part of the daf which is going to take us knee deep into tomorrow's daf So a tiny introduction and that is there's a that says that it's so this is the first par talks about all the different as it relates to doing with these are the of yester year and one of those is one was not allowed to sell a behem to an there's a whole discussion theor why But mascana sagamura the reason is as follows cuz we're afraid that if you're going to sell a behem to you may also lend and lease to okay and what's wrong with doing that tell you what's wrong with doing that if you only lend it or lease it that means you the are the you're [snorts] going to give it to is going to do work with it on shabas you work seven days a week not just six days a week and as a your beh is going to end up doing on chabas which is not okay because just like you have to keep shabas we mentioned earlier you mus as well so because of a that you selling the gasa may lead again how so because if you're going to sell it you may be masher and that could lead came out very strongly and they said it's aner to sell a behem Now to be clear if you only sell you never were mas then even if the is going to do with it it's his it's not yours the concern is all there was we you're really the so therefore you're so for that reason the says you're not allowed to go ahead and forget about you're not even allowed to sell a to stating that the Mishna says that was m in the event that the animal is ashur ashw means the animal's injured and because it's injured right means it has a broken leg says it can't do mala right now if this animal can't do mala right now so what are you worried about you worried that if you're going to be allowed to sell it you may and then is going to do with it it's on the disabled list it's on injured reserve it can't do any mala right now and as a result has a a famous he's mishur The backdrop to the rest of today's daf is going to be of but first we're going to see part of this anyways in a we learned over there where's there after the mentions said that it's to sell to the extent it's a why because it's not right said they let us sell a donkey sorry a horse and the The reason you're allowed to sell a horse is because a horse even if it does ma will not do right a horse doesn't work in the field he's not what he does. So what do people use horses for back in the day? That was a form of transportation, right? They would uh get around using a horse. If a person got around riding a horse, he wouldn't be anyways. So it's for that reason it's not going to be was says what would Rhuda hold with regards to an Uber? Is it to sell the of in the world of Rabuda? Why uh would you think that maybe it's Mut? So let's just pick it up before we see it inside. It's because Rab Yehuda was mishur. Why was he mishur? Because it can't do me. Well, an Uber also can't do mala. So based on that, you would think it's mut. Now it's interesting. The gumar is going to have a little bit of a of a shock of the to endy. Either we'll see it later tonight or tomorrow, but at the end of the is going to give an obvious tomorrow is going to say the sounds like it's injured. And I don't know like what the rehab of this uh injury is but maybe that's why it's just a matter of months before it's probably going to be able to do that would seem to be a very obvious distinction. Interestingly enough, the is not going to mention this now on we will see that far but either way says the inside the reason is because right now it's injured it can't do well if that's is right it's anyways it's like that it's like based on that you would think or maybe the concept of an animal that's avuri says is not typical right it's aesh Those are Rash's words and being that it's a right now the concern of why said don't sell is completely irrelevant. You want to say you know I'm afraid if you're going to sell the you may sell the nonur and then be mash mas the nonw and then it's going to end up doing on on shabas. No one's going to confuse a shva and a nonwur. If the cow shows up right in crutches you're going to this is a little bit different. He's rehabbing something now. It's a you don't have to be concerned. But when it comes to the Uber being that there's nothing unique. There's nothing unusual about an maybe it's not viewed as a meaning maybe over here you have to beer and you can't just take this line position as it relates to the because if you're going to be mad be m to other things as well. So we know was a big mass he was mur butud was mur the question is maybe was only mur because the doesn't apply and he's also not worried that people will confuse it and conflate it with a regular animal because it's a everyone the is a little bit different but my the is like the but it's there's no in selling an it's just a regular So based on that if because he's just well the as well but if he's taking into account well the is not aesh the says at first glance I think we have arrived from our and obviously that's why we're discussing this right now the said the second of the five cases that was mentioned in the was that if somebody sells to the right so the owns the mother and he sells the and what did the Mishna say through threw in one Even though you're not allowed to do it. Why not allow to do it? Obviously because it's innocent to sell. Now if you're going to tell me who is holds that also you're sell. So just like you have his sheet in the mission of we shouldn't have it here in the mission of as we don't have it in the even though he was not because that number one it's injured and it's also as opposed to which although it's proverbally injured can't do but it's not but the say it's not a I'll prove to you because according to you what was the third case of the Mishna If someone does with and then the continued fourth and fifth cases now two of those three cases involved the situation where you're now giving something to you're a flatout or the case where you're nice and you own the mother and the of the right and you're going and you're bringing in the as a as a but the point is in in really not just two of these three cases in all three of these cases you have a with okay and are you going to tell me [snorts] over there we know how do we know he's over there we saw this already earlier in the why we needed all five because we know in a case where the is he's going to be three of the five cases in the Mishna are talking about cases of and the Mishna says very very clearly that what's is that you're going to be even though we know there's a that holds you're going to be and ironically almost coincidentally who is that it happens to be but the bottom line is the Misha didn't mention that that's the what do you have to say in other words you can't tell me from the fact that we didn't mention that when we said the words that's the lake that must be mo over there so that even though he was but he's going to be over here because I can tell you beyond a reasonable doubt that there is audi next part of the he's 100% and the didn't mention when it said that your potter that it's like Elm what do you have to Okay, you have to say that even though not telling you every right now speaks and it's not going to mention every bottom line is you can't prove anything from here. So again we're left with a sh is what we hold as it relates to an we went through the study ail we even went through the first hash which was from our Mishna we fell flat. So the gar now is going to bring a a second tash and this one is already from a now this that we're about to mention is the [gasps] holds that in the event that and is contrary to the is going to be in again we saw twice already up until this point this ofuda it's based not on a it's based on a now is going to present this. So here it goes says that was from so he takes a and his arrangement is that he's going to work with the and there's going to be some sort of with the and now the from the gave birth to a child it was a in other words so as follows. We figure out, we determine, we do an assessment of what the value of this is. And the is goes and he takes half of whatever that value is and he gives it to the so if we determine the animal is worth $100. The Israel writes a $50 check to the Now Rashi speaks out that that's being that the Yid and the own this animal bashf this animal has no there's no real inherent which a regular does have but there is a kadusha and is that by going ahead instead of right he has a for the animals so he writes a check to kadush and transfers from the onto the money and he gives that money to to the and that's how he fulfills his obligation as it relates to that owns and he gives it to him to be the operator gives it to says even though he's not allowed to do this right you're not let go ahead and just give a a is that up until 10 times its value and he has to go ahead and give all the money to the so two things the Misha says as it relates to someone who owns an animal he gives it to operate same arrangement it's with and are going to divide the the so says the bride says it's follow no you weren't allowed to do it okay and really because you're not allowed to do it I said, "There's a kass." And the kass is twofold. It's a two-headed kass. Number one, you have to go buy back from the operator this animal that you just gave it, but the guy doesn't want to give it to you. All right? Or make him an offer. He can't refuse. What should I do? Offer him double? No, 10x. If he doesn't come back to me, but the bottom line is you have to literally pay up to 10 times its value to make sure you're going to try to get it back. That's number one. Number two, when you go ahead and you give the kay and your which we know you have to do, you don't just give 50%. You go ahead and you give 100%. Now, who's talking in this price is the one that's talking. This is the holds that even though the has a little bit different than your regular there's no resolutions of but at the end of the day there is going to be but what do you see from here? You see one line. We just need one line. We're actually not even discussing ironically the part of this uh what we want is the part of this. What did Yeud say that? Oh [snorts] that you know the Mishna said why would we be so what do you see from here that even though was he was not by an what's the difference can't do work that's why it's the also can't do work is because by it can't do work it's also and there's no reason to go ahead and to be kindest but when it comes to an although it's true it can't do work so from that standpoint It's dummy. It's a ku of but at the same time it is notesh and being that it's notes actually makes a lot of sense that maybe it would be but bottom line at first glance this would be ashma right sounds pretty compelling but the gmorra itself recognizes that in order to prove its point from this it still has to make one assumption those are the next three words of the garra my aren't we talking about that when the bryer said what it meant was to give the Uber to the and if that's the case obviously you see clearly that even though was but he holds that the seller is not going to be okay now why are we assuming that that's what the Bryce is talking about because it sounds like the arrangement was what the arrangement in the Mishna was this owner operator relationship where there's a Y who owns an animal female animal. He's going now and he's making a deal together with I'm going to maintain ownership of the animal and we're going to have a a deal where you're going to own the so the yid never gave away the animal. All he gave away was some percentage of the and say he said so you see it sounds like it that it's the that's if that's the case it's that even though it comes to an it's going to be maybe that's not the case maybe the case is maybe we're talking about a whole different situation maybe we're making a little bit of a tus over Maybe the situation is where this person went ahead and he gave a a behemoth and the deal was you're going to work the behemoth. We're going to split whatever is going to come from the behemoth. We're not only splitting what's coming from the we're actually going to be in the underlying asset in this case the mother. So it's really the mother that was being given over and the deal was anything that comes from this mother. OKAY? SO IF IT has a child that's and that's why there's a not just that we're going to be co and you have to give 100% of whatever it is but the bottom line is says the maybe the deal was not where the is keeping ownership of the mother and only selling a maybe the deal was where the is actually selling of the mother and that's in there's no one in the world who holds that ask and if that's case has nothing to do with who's and maybe just like it's to sell as well but the says I have a tactical issue with this you know why because said is false said with kindness this person to buy back what he sold up to 10 times Dumb of what is dum of lash his value. Now if it's talking about the so that we mean the the is being referred to but if it means the mother it should be it shouldn't be says no no no for that this is a Bryce right Bryce is we don't have such a hard time editing certainly dumb of or switch it to a that's not a big deal just switch it to and the over here is not for selling an it's for selling a mother and change the gear to but the says I have a problem with that because the price continue whatever I say afterwards of now that's part that the is the same as the right it's the same referring back to the same exact thing. So if what you told was the mother and means not because that's doesn't pass for a mother. It's well that would mean so when you go ahead now and you give the you're giving the full value of the mother that makes zero sense you're giving the full value of the childish that's the second that you don't just give half the value of the animal even though you're only a half you give the FULL VALUE BUT IT'S NOT THE mother it's for sure going to be the if the reference of the braes Why are you giving the full value of the mother? That makes absolutely no sense. He has no in the mother to sell the he nothing else. And the says I can get out of this as well. How come could be the Bryce is talking about the case is talking about where it was an owner operator relationship and the situation was where this person went ahead and he did a full-blown but he gave Sai the mother and Sai the Uber meaning the behemoth was already marta she was already pregnant so right now you went ahead and gave a mother and you gave an Uber as well. And there's going to be a a a division. There's going to be a s the mother and s the Okay, now that's partial that what you did with the mother was not okay. You had no right to go ahead and and sell the mother, right? The uber that we're suggesting that maybe it would have been no to sell the but for sure you're going to get for what you just did with the mother. That was not something you were allowed to do. that being that for sure we're going to give you a for giving away the mother cuz that was not something that was okay. So says for that reason we're going to give you a on the Uber as well. So I'll tell you the we're handling the Uber here. We're for sure handling the Uber. So if we're handling the Uber so you see right you see you see do it. It's true. It's true in this situation. you see any but it's only because we're clipping you already for the fact that you sold the mother that we say you know what we're going to get you for the child as well but the if all you were doing was selling the could be in that situation it wouldn't be a problem because and to the extent would be m as it relates to an as well so again was the wasur is on the one hand the like do but then again maybe with the fact it's you don't have to be concerned that people will confuse this with a regular animal but it's not maybe it's going to be different at first glance we have because in this is clearly saying and it's clear that what you did wrong over here was you sold over and just sell the mother. How do we know that? Because it says and it's the same as the means for selling over. So it's there's audi but this is talking over in this. So isn't it a muffish that although he was mishuru he would hold over as a problem? The answer is no. Because it could be in this case although we're canceling you for the Uber. But it could be it's talk about you also sold the mother. You sold both the mother and the Uber and Migu that we're going to cancel you for the mother. We're also going to cancel for the Uber. I'm again we're still stuck here. We don't know. Rabud was he also maybe is going to be differenti from another. Okay. That's here. He says it again in the now he adds a little bit. The reason is because he has no way of getting better. What do you see from here? If he had a way to get better. So then over he would hold even only holds that if this is an injury this is a career-ending injury. But to the extent that he's going to come back at some point then this wouldn't apply. If that's the case for even if an is like but at some point this is going to be born and when it's going to be born it's going to be able to do so the is the case it's from this that would hold that an would be because an can't be worse than that's and from the holds is going to be it's going to be in as well either way. So what's the of this very very last part of we have holds that even though but wanted to know what would hold with regards to selling an of aa would that be mut would then be what's the mut because an uber is why you allow to sell the because it can't do also can't do. What was the other side? The other was maybe it's here for the fact that it can't do and it's but it's not that it's not notes. Maybe in that case it would actually be the first was from our which is why we're having this conversation now. The second tash was from an elaborate which happens to be a very much it is the who popped up a few times on he holds that even though the town of our is of the opinion that there's no of holds yet in that there seems to be a but deflected that as well. And then finally he always gets the last say in a he's in a that but he added a little bit of language right the bases are always a little wordier than the that's why you find so often you have a Mishna with an because the Mishna spoke so little that it's very hard to know what's going to be the in this case in that case and the that speaks a little bit more and in that says Oh, if that's the case, you see even a would be also to the extent that it's going to have an is not going to be any worse than and based on that is but what about an nober is going to be awesome. Now he's going to bring of the we're going to bring another version of the affformentioned exchanged. So uh the good news is it's literally it's 100% if you felt that you wanted this again innovating the is going to do it for us albe it with a slightly different angle but you know some are a little bit more mikata this one is like a tweak it's very very nuanced there were those that had this affformentioned exchanged on our Mishna as opposed to which Mishna how did the last give Right. We just learn every word of a black. The affforementioned exchange started with aishn and then we worked our way to our from the but it started where what was the somebody was saying and he had audi of the law is on our the exchange began with a mishna in bakis household Mishna said this was the second case of the mission that if somebody owns a and then he sells the call even though you're not let to do it is that you're going to be and now the chimed in they said shouldn't we assume that our mission is like which part of the that says you're not let us sell over isn't that the lake which holds that you let That's why the same thing says even maybe you're sell because in addition to it being right now not able to do it's also not it's no one's going to confuse it with a regular maybe it's going to be different bring you a ride and this is that long brace that we mentioned earlier. here. So somebody was and now it had a child. So we figure out what the value of the child is and the has to go give this that even though he has a non-Jewish partner, it doesn't exempt him from the laws of stating that there's no condition. So what do you do? You write a check for half its value that event is the one that owns the underlying animal and he gives it to even though he's not let do it talking not let it to do what to buy back the deal and he has to give the full value of the to the coin not just now my when we say that it's And aren't we talking about the Uber? See, see clearly who you're not going to sell the Uber. Even though Uber is going to be different must be because it's or maybe the case over here was you never even sold. You just sold the behem. That's why it's going to the behemoth is a female because it gave birth. So clearly it's a female. And if that's the case of doesn't work, it should say dumb. No dou of Yeah. But the problem is it says dumov twice. And the second time it says dum, it's referring to the value that you have to give to the kay. It doesn't make any sense that you should be giving the value of the mother. Mean you're going to change the first time you got to change the second. So the second you're giving the full value to the makes no sense. Why you giving anything to the again? If it's the makes sense. That's what you have to give to the and not just half. You have to give the whole. But if it's the mother then you're 100% right. It's clearly implied in this brier that there was an iss to to give away the but could be the case is when you gave the it was a so you were for sure as relates to the mother. So could be in that situation even who really would be maybe maybe but in this case he would be and the reason is that we're going to offer a you know we throw in a gilgalas but could be in a vacuum now. Okay. So what's the bottom line is no better or worse than that's and if that's the case we have a clear and this concludes our base. So as it relates to rate the is just uh too much the of this man are just too powerful. as much as it's the first day of but I think it's to speak out related to the shibet in Russash and this is in shibis ra he brings a kasha that he heard from his brother zatal and for those that were holding in the rashim will remember this question and that is he asked why is it that in the of kdes and on rashash and in the of you don't make kdes on yum that we mention that rashash and yum kipper respectively are at first glance rash has nothing to do with yum kipper has nothing to do with. So says says he has no and he went through every time that we say be it Shabas be it be it even his reasons clear reasons in the why it is that they are somewhat related to but the brother of the at first glance they have nothing to do with so why isn't that we say and also of so we mentioned what answered as it relates to he said based on where talks about different things that happened on and one of them was of the were working in miter onash being that there was a significant milestone in the of and he thereof on rashash there is a between this man of it's for that reason we say the continues And he says, "Let me tell you my thought why it is that is the reason is because every 50 years was and they would pull out a and they would blow and one of the things that happened on was all the were freedom doesn't mean forever really means." So was a where the slaves used to go free. WHEN DID SLAVES go free? WHEN WE LEFT MITZIM. IN FACT, ONE of the reasons we have to free our slaves is because we were once slaves and they freed us. And as a result, we're to go ahead and free them as well. So it's for that reason BECAUSE has a which of course is on SOME LEVEL RELATED TO THAT'S WHY when we talk about the of we mentioned that is it's saying it's one of the but it's still sounds like there's some real deep connection between the set a little bit of but it feels like he was a little bit to maybe offer another possibility. So lustafina maybe we could say maybe it's even posit and maybe it's even a little bit and that is what's the kipper being the day of so we just spoke about this literally in the last so for those holding in the end of it was a long but for those that were holding the last four raid bites of were the story of the ego and it's we spoke out from the rabb and we spoke out from and we spoke out from and this is something that's quoted by the in many different places that the reason became the is because forum meaning usually we're accustomed to thinking that the reason got for the oner was because it's yum kiper. So it makes sense that would be the day that they would get it was actually the reason yum kipper is yum kipper is because of the fact that there was a a terrible that was looming over Israel AND WE FINALLY GOT kapar it was on the 40th day foru was summoned to the mountain either for the second time or the third time but the bottom line is at the conclusion of that 40 days which was which was the kisra finally and being that they got that day went down in history. It would go down as it would always be the which means which is the is it because of what? Because there was so really if a person is mindful of the day of and he understands what what's today all about it's curious to know what's the history of this day? Oh, it's because you know once upon a time once upon a time the we were mitz and then we left mit and then seven weeks later we stood at the foot of gave us the and then went up to for 40 days and 40 nights and then on the 40th day we started getting really nervous and anxious and then we ended up worshiping theel and it took 40 days and then another 40 days and then finally on this day. So really if you if you trace back the steps [laughter] of the yakadesh to its origin it's going to put you right back in mitim it's going to remind you're going to be telling the story of we just told the story the entire week it's the story of mit so it could be could be based on that there's an element of being because of which of is very much related to but I think it's much much deeper than this and this is I think where the ems part maybe plays in and that is as follows we spoke in those shurim that as soon as sinned with a told right allow me please let me get really really angry angry at the I'm going to wipe them out, right? And I'll start all over again from you. And immediately when heard what was going on and because of the he was able to get like says out of critical condition. As soon as he did that, he realized they weren't in immediate jeopardy anymore. Say he goes down from the mountain and he his mad whatever he had to be mad. He destroyed the he gave the to drink from the why exactly he did that and he gave to he went and he to the showed up and he had go ahead and kill approximately 3,000 people and then he starts to heaven again and again and again and really through his he started getting a little bit more pierce the original just got the out of immediate danger but it didn't get them and but then over the course of the next 40 days he was able to come to some level of where at the very least was viewing the yidd in a more favorable way but the Jews were nowhere near where they needed to be most notably the yidden were going to go into the land of they weren't going to be wiped out right they got terms but at the same time at the same time said I'm not going to be mashina together with you that special relationship that I told you about at harina night. Well, that's water under the bridge. That's not happening anymore. And by the way, the mishk which according to many hashem had already told about that's also off the table because the mishk means and I'm not willing to be so summoned to the mountain and this for uh another period of time and this time went he went and he ded and he ded the go said 40 days and 40 nights straight fa over and over and over again without getting any favorable response. And what did he dive in for? He ded number one, I don't want you to take us into I want you to take us in by yourself. Additionally, we spoke that was very important to because he was always secure that there's never going to be another Jewish people. But once he wasn't he wasn't so sure anymore. And then finally, he said and then on the very very last day, I'll give you everything. forget the I'm taking you in as it relates to I'm going to do that for you as well. and and it says and he showed him the which was a tool that was going to have if they ever found themselves in a situation like this like this they'll be able to get again we'reing over a lot of what we did earlier in the week very very quickly but then told he said is one last thing we need to do we need to reenact our covenant we have to renew our vows And that bris means you're going to have to do certain things. There's a whole bunch of mitzvah that I mentioned then the parisa and it means that I'm also going to have to do certain things. And what I'm going to do is is I'm going to rededicate myself to you in the way I had told you I was going to the first time we had this conversation in paras. spoke out based on the terror from the brisker in parasim that what is this press that really if you go back and you look at the story of kabal you see it's divided into two groups there's the narrative of paras and there's the narrative of paras the narrative of parro talks about the event when the narrative of paras mishbatim is the special bris the covenant that was made between and that's why the story of mina is divided with into two groups there and it's based on the two things that were happening simultaneously but you have to know what's what like the brisk said it's negate to know what was saying not to forget and it's negated to know what the bris is because that's the paradigm of how would always be bris for all future generations but the bottom line is being that at the time when the were they were a and there was a bris which was b now when the yidd went and they worshiped They were made for the bris. They were made for that bris. And as a result, they needed a bris all over again. And that's the that's what's going on in the end of of that's the whole back end is re-engaging that go so far as to say they said all over again. When did they say because that's once again read are renewing their vows. What was the verse? The bris was you're going to be my n. You're going to be a chosen nation. I'm going to watch over you. You're going to be like a like a an an expensive jewel. You're going to be a diamond. You're not just going to be a nation. You're going to be a nation of priests, a nation of kings. You're going to be a kanim. You're not just going to be a nation. You're going to be a holy nation. You're going to be a you're going to have this special bond, this very, very special relationship with me. That bris was the original bris. It was severed and then finally ones was that bris happened all over again. So this I think is mish. We know that at the lea we drink four cups of wine. Why we drink four cups of wine? It's connected the foolishness of gula vi and all foolishness of gula mentioned in the beginning of in the beginning of paras right paras begins where parishes leaves off where mosha and they go to par for the first time. Shem says, "You're going to see. He's going to let you out." And it completely backfires. Andu comes and he says, "Instead of things getting better, things actually got worse." And Raenu came, he spoke sh right he was punished for it. He came and he spoke sh at the beginning of tells no worries. Trust me, I have this. It's going to work out. And he tells Tell them the gul is coming and there's going to be four stages to this happens. It happens. It happens. It happens. Take a look at the what are these four things is when they left is what's every single that I looked at every single says the same thing you know was I'm reading from the that's when it was says says the same thing. What was the it's referring to when the finally came to that's when finally finally was the fourth step of was that was the fourth step when the stood at but what aspect of was really really the vill which aspect was it and the prrisker that said, we could even clarify. Is it the events of paras or is it when made this special bris with Is it the events of parish? If you take a look at the ramban says I purposely left off the last three words. IT WAS THE BRIS. IT WAS THE brisk who made a covenant that he said you're going to be my not just you're going to keep every has it's that special relationship that I'm going to have with you that's the left when they were they left that's when they finally left mit I thought they left no it was it was it was and then finally Finally the left when they left when they stood by but what was the that's where it was but then the worship and when they worshiped the ego you know what happened they lost that bris and you know what then happened to a certain degree they went back to mitz they didn't physically go back to mitz but they lost the fourth level of gula they lost the fourth level of gula If they would have sat down by a seda that year, they would had three cups of wine. They would have had the fourth glass. You know why? Cuz they didn't have the because was severed. When did they get it back? They got it BACK ON YUMIPPER. WHICH MEANS THAT ULTIMATELY WHEN WAS IN THE sky when did that happen? It happened on yumipper. So I ask you is yum kipper not WE LEFT MIT ON YUMIPPER THAT'S THAT'S when we left that's when the fourth lotion of the gul was that's we left we physically we left yeah we we know when we left physically that's one pes but the mam didn't happen in one schlav and if you're not sure count the glasses of wine you have at the last that's not counting the ones you have by the way but to count the glasses of wine that you have that was on and then seven days later by we came to the and then there was the I always thought it was on and to a degree it was but really the real the real you know when that happened THE REAL MY THE BRIS OF Sai happened was severed. We got it again with and that happened when that happened on and it's because that happened on ultimately goes down as you know says that say there's two that is going to have two that when comes are not going to be one is everybody knows the other one is it's yumipper we're going to have purim and we're going to have yum and says I'm going to tell you why I think we're going to have those two We can have those two because those are the two of those are the two of those are the two we got and says we got it's not IF WE'RE GOING TO celebrate we should be celebrating we shouldn't be celebrating we shouldn't be celebrating it's a because when We celebrate. We're celebrating not just the fact that we got the the bris of the and the bris THAT WE GOT ON WAS it was it was the bris on that bris were broken. We need a new cuz there was a new bris and that bris happened on yum kipper. So really goes down as the real day of that's the day that we got the bris. that's the case is very much but either way it's another dimension another in terms of understanding this holy holy day is the day of is a day of if you think about it from historical significance that's the day we finally left mit makes sense that we would have finally been to leave on the holiest day of the year is a day of of to be able to tap in to all the of the day of of the special it's a day where 40 days and and and he what but he didn't give up and on the 40th day on this this is the day this is the day where a person could dive in again and again and again and he wonders if anyone's even paying attention to his but [snorts] on this day is where it can come together. That's the school of the day. It's the day where it all comes together. It came together for the day that was to come together for we just have to appreciate it, understand what the day is, tap into it. a gitaben stew and aar sim.