Bechoros 15

Today's is and we will begin about 10 lines from the top of the two dots. So the topic of the daf is the which discusses the of so what exactly is if somebody is makish an animal he makes it etc is this animal will remain hectish forever meaning he has no ability to now go and transfer the kusha from the animal onto something else and that's in contrast to most other types of hectish where even after your makish something there's a way to have sellers remorse. It's possible to transfer the kadusha that you just created onto something else. You could be you could be something that you an animal however that you to go on the is you can't be there is one exception however that is if the animal gets a m if the animal gets a m a m a permanent type of m then is you could be meaning you could take the kadusha from the animal you could transfer it onto something else stating that the animal itself that you were just p will not but rather it's still going to maintain some levels of kadusha with regards to what will that animal still have kadusha. So that was the on the Mishna went through a whole bunch of different some of which we're going to discuss in this morning's stuff. But from a high level what the Mishna did was the Mishna was between an animal that had this mum before it became hact and an animal that acquired the mum after it was already hish. meaning an animal that at the time that you were maktish already had this mum kava being that it got off on the wrong foot. It already had the mum at the time that you were maktish. It's for that reason its level of kadusha that it will have pig is almost negligible as the Mishna spoke out. As it relates however to an animal that had and only afterwards got this then is that even though you could be paid because now it already has a but being that there was a time where it had a regular hectish before it had the even though you could be pit you will not be pit to the extent when you'd be able to remove the hectish the carbon that was hectish that has a m that you now are being so that it should be is what's known as so is a that has a where is you could be either way the topic of the is the of just one in the that's very important to today's and that p is really the to this of the idea that it's possible to be p a once it has a kava and that's a p very much tucked way it's the context over there is telling the you're going to go you're going to have an ability to bring and he says be very careful that you're going to decide that you want to bring a carbon wherever you want to bring a carbon you can't do that then he continues and this is the pos we need rack So the joys as follows tells you're going to come and you're going to want to bring a carbon. You can't just bring a carbon wherever you want. Then the says, "Well, not so fast." You can do and bring a carbon anywhere you want. In fact, a can eat from this carbon can eat from this carbon. You could eat it the same way you could eat at what's the I thought we just said that you can't bring carbon wherever you want. How do you understand? So Rashi brings Kazal who said that the second P the P that says that it's okay to bring a carbon wherever you want is not talking about a regular carbon but rather it's talking about a carbon that is that if you're to the point that so we're talking not about a regular carbon but we're talking about a carbon that has a what we know it's add carbon that you can eat wherever you want. If that's the case, the last words of the PK then are very meaningful because the Pik said that this is going to be treated and they're not they're allowed to eat it. So essentially what the is saying is that you're allowed to eat the same way that you're eat on that note the discussion. So again a carbon that has a you're going to be now but where the hectish was first it was afterwards it had so over there the said is that after how do you know that how do you know that this is going to be from and from now a little bit of the is that a firstborn animal has kadusha stating that it's only the firstborn animal of a behemoth that has kadusha firstborn animal of ach does not have kadusha is only it's not another when you have to take the you have to give it to stating that the says in that it's only it's not so when the says that this is and from what we're essentially saying is that even though it has even though you even though the says you can eat it wherever you want but at the same time it still has certain it's just like and it's from just like the comparesto Just like as opposed to just like okay to tell me that it's from how do I know it's absolutely why isn't from and there's no says if you tell me that is treated like so why don't we take it a step further we know that you're not allowed to eat certain of an animal but it's only of you are allowed Why don't we say that you should be allowed to eat it says in the word is always so it's in this to teach me that it's only with regards to it's not like as it relates to the said that from the word I I would not that's why I need in other words why is it Franko that if there was only one I would use it to bear maybe use it to bear says because in general is much less than mates every animal that you have to be mafar is only a zar and it's only the firstborn zakar thus being that in general is something that's much less common. If I only had one, I only had I would have used it to be for now that I have I use it to be absolutely why don't we say that just like don't have the just like just like and just I'm sorry just like and just like and just like Maton is only by they're not. So if we're saying treated like why don't we see they don't have that of what would be the to say that there's no in other words said in that what's the whole rationale to say that maybe there's no maybe there's no when it comes to it's because a hybrid it's heck dish. It started off as a regular carbon. Now you were pant you can't be once it has a you could be so it's a little bit it's a little bit as a result there's a to say that if the computer so we'll say that this animal will also be from those two things and what would be then the what's the lenus we look at it like that's not the lumbness the lness is we look at it as because it has it and if he is part from it's from so too this is going to be part It's going to be popular. But as it relates and has so as it relates to as it relates to so there's a to say potter. Thus I'll use the to be and tell me that you're in fact but you don't start with a even that it should be potter because what are the tooth start them? It's either or it's if it's you want to know why you don't use the to teach me that because no there has to be a this is based on this together of the heish is is that we're going to view it as with regards to those two but as being that it's even so there's no to to make to be and to tell me that he should be but asked the very obvious follow-up question if that's the case then why did the Bryson need a to tell me that there's an what would have been the well there's no so maybe there should be no here either what's that there should be a hat. If you look at it as there's an and if you look at it as because the is by has nothing to do with all animals. Still you see there would have been a tokish to tell me that just like doesn't have maybe doesn't have if that's the case use of as well right I hear what you're saying you're right I can't tell you in that there shouldn't be that has to be because you see the is going to work even with says it shouldn't work. You see that from the itself as it relates to but at the end of the day the is gives us the answer to why is from the why because just like we said because it says so too you'll say either way so the first terret of the as it relates to why it is that there's no why is it that why We say that shouldn't be the terret is that it says in the he of and just like the used to be so up until this point as relates to number one is it's number two is insp so theish is only with regards to it's not with regard to those two things had a a little bit of a difference. So when it says it's coming to tells me even though there's a maybe no thus there is when it comes to if that's the case how do you know that is now learned to teach me both the and didn't want to do that said I'll give you a from you learn it from the word. It says the context over there is a that has a where if it's treated like you could be but very similar and the over there says that the of what does it mean? Why would it be you could eat the dam is they look at it as why would the say you could eat the in the best case scenario was like so why would you think you have to say a very big what it says in the you know what it means it doesn't mean don't eat the it means don't eat the and if the is saying clearly that It's going to be true for all there's going to be if the means when it says the obvious question then let it say the I'll tell you why I didn't say it I would have been I would have made a very big mistake I would have had it said that you're not so I would have thought that when it says you can't eat the it means that you don't have the but at the same time it could be it's not it could be it's going to be meaning had said in the PK then I would have thought that the that when the Torah is saying it means that there's a regular but not an iss that the Torah is telling me that it's but that there's noar the said it's had it said that so that's not negotiable but at the same time I would have thought there's noar and just like and don't have an issue this doesn't have an issue of those people that would have made that mistake. But the terror went ahead and did was the said and when the said really meant but to teach me that the is like the and just like the is so too this is going to be as well. How could Robert say that when it says it's coming to but as it relates to it's because of the so is much more because saying something that the doesn't say way is going to be the price is and this is interesting that the price is not telling you the definitive reason why it is that is but rather what the BR is saying is is that had it not said the then I would have thought I would have anyways known how would I know I would have known it from now that it says I don't need to tell me how do I know I know it from so again there were four that we've discussed to this point with regards to what type of where it First it was then it had then you and this is some sort of hybrid between with regards to some we treat it like with regards to other we treat it like we said that it's treated like with regards to the fact that it's from how do I know that because says you can eat wherever you want oh like an that's doesn't have doesn't have this is not going to is not going to have either. Now for different reasons doesn't have it because it's these animals are areas. They don't have it because of but the point is it's a two additional was that it's and it's really already spoke out. There's no mean really there's no good reason to think that it shouldn't because it's a but if it's but but being that you have a heckish that compers and the and the don't have and the don't have so now that mock to say that looks not like maybe we don't look at it as a at all at the end of the day you have for that what are the one word knocks out of according to takes care of I know you have the because it says it doesn't mean it means why would the terrorists use the word dam to talk about to make sure you don't make the mistake and think that there's an there's no that it's like a regular dam that always has an issue is going to have an issued and said that where first then you still as it relates to the fact that you can't do work with it on it says again it's the same so you can use this animal now but not to shear its wool it says you could eat the can't drink the milk you could eat you can't feed it to your dogsish and give it to your dog a different it's not this not that not that but rather the way we is look at the from a big picture once you shack it then it's yours but before you shack it you can't so when do you shear an animal before you shack it no that you can't do when would you milk an animal before you shack it that you can't do but if that's the says comes out then you would be able to feed it to your meaning if each word okay you can't be and then feed it to your dogs. If however it's more of you can do whatever you want with it. So in theory you can milk it after in theory you can shear it after you should be able to feed it to your dogs as well. between the two says the is whether you can be to feed it to your dogs. So it was here it's so what's with the of this if this animal now gives birth to a baby. So what's with it? So the vlad of the animal and the milk of the animal are going to be after there's two very important that are very this rather complicated gumar and that is number one doesn't say it says it's a very vague term we'll see are going to struggle with this word additionally it says clearly it sounds like it would be before pig maybe would be different says the gumar as follows So we're discussing the of an animal that's that has a is that the is also so we're going to discuss the part of the Mishna not the part of the says we need more information is the case where you had an animal that was an well it couldn't be an it was and then it And you played it and after the it was became pregnant and now it gave birth to a child and that's what the mission is saying that that Vlad is going to be a why should it be aerad we should look at it like the and we just said are treated like an except they treat it like an why should it be a now the truth is what's the kasha even though the mikdashim are treated like that in And to a degree and that's the literal meaning of that you're allowed to eat it but we just said of because on some level we do look at it as if it has we just said no we said that so why is it so that because everything happened after it was understanding right but being that you see that even after the it doesn't go there's a whole complicated of how you treat this animal can't feed it to the dogs or maybe you could feed it to the dogs. So maybe it's still going to be user this vlad that was born afterwards discusses it in the but it's from the that as it relates to the kadusha of the if the would be born you would treat it like a there's no reason in the world that it should be there's no reason for it to have any you have to say it's talking about where the animal became pregnant before the animal gave birth after incidentally if that's the case the that we made when we spoke out the heading of this. It's only that this is the that what that it's only user but it doesn't have but it sounds like if the animal would become pregnant and give birth before the animal already had a you could be but you weren't paid yet and now it was this. So it sounds like not only is it going to be but it's even going to have in other words there's three majus just to set this up very clearly. So we're discussing the vlad of mikashim where it was not so hard and and really three majas. One majre is where the everything happened after so after the pion already the animal became pregnant and gave birth there the is the animal is there's no issues with this animal you can do whatever you want with this animal. The other extreme would be where everything happened before the pig animal had the mum ready. You weren't it was it was this and now an animal was born. That animal has kadusha. What's the definition of that kadusha? That's the next but for right now the animal for sure has kadusha. If the iore happened before the pigon and the happened after the pion that's the case of the mishna and the of the iser and what does mean? We'll have to see that in the garra as well. But either way for now it's three. So I mean the is now is a very important the is coming to teach me that whereas is always and is almost always but could be but the hell the town of the price of hell that that is extra because if a schlam could be either a zak or a what could the have just done said nothing it should have said bring this type of animal that type of animal it's not necessary must be he's coming to teach me things then not only if you're something as but the is considered that is considered I know that a of a animal that's at that doesn't have a or the of an animal doesn't have a how about the of or the the rabbi either way. So with the mar now how you know that the vlad of a carbon has learned out from the that are born meaning when the happened before the but the late happened after the pion like the case of what's going to be if it was born before the pion. digresses like there it's already there's a says that it has you can even put on the says that no you can't put on the being that it was born to an animal that has a you can't put on the but at the same time it has you have to let it wait until it gets and then you can be poed whatever is going to be so the wording and the commas in this are a little bit tricky but essentially what the just did was clarified one of the things that we weren't sure about and that is if you have an animal that has a and it gave birth before the pion. So the is we said it's kadesh that was the dick that the made it sounds like only if the lady happened is it only but if the happened before the pion not only is iter it's even question is what does that mean? So you see over here it's who this m is we don't know. There's a mama that says that it's you can actually put on the mah. There's another mand says you can't put it on the misbeh. Why would you think you shouldn't be able to put on misbeh? It's an animal that was born to a mother that has a okay but that's not our Mishna. That was just the dick that we made in the Mishna. Where the Gmorra is going to focus now is on the of the was where the E happened before the delay that happened after the pigeon there is not and here is you know what you do you take the animal the after it's born you put it in a you lock it up in a room they mason it starves to death you kill it and ra says you have to do this cuz I don't have another way to work this out. Should you be m there's no way you can be macro of such an animal. Okay, why can't you be paid? The reason you can't be because it was born after the pion. So being that it was born after the pion of the mother, the pion of the mother affected the so the doesn't have enough kadusha for you to be able to be ped. It's a little counterintuitive. You need more kadusha on something in order to be able to be ped that kadusha, right? Sometimes you need more kadusha for the pig to be tyus. So being that it was born after the opinion of the mother there's no m for the for the to be and as a result there's no there's no that there isn't that before you what you do is assuming it's a just for argument sake you go ahead and you as a I thought you can't be played so what do you You're going to be the with the it has from its mother. What it means is doesn't mean but what it means is said there is an is that before the mother you could be the mother. There's nothing to talk about. That's the often the baby was born. But what you were supposed to do, this was the that right before you were p to the mother before while the baby was still inside, you're supposed to be mish the baby with the kadusha that it already has from the mother. Once you do that, now here's the punch line. The py not easy of the mother won't be on the uber thus you it won't lose its kadusha so that you will be able to be p to the child after the child was already born. So according to there's no nothing to do with this child because that was born there's no way to be mate and there's no way to be p cuz it doesn't have enough kadusha. Why it doesn't have enough kadusha? Because of the pig of the mother was klad. So there's no way to be ped right once it's born there's no way but there's but if you're smart about it there is a way out the way out is is before you the mother be the by doing that the opinion of the mother won't be if that's the case then when the is born you'll be able to be pub so at the very least you'll have something from it won't be there will be there will there will be some sort of now the truth is rashi speaks out just in that terms understand the a little bit better and that is that that's push that this is only an issue on the dab level. There's no issue on the level. The reason I wish one of the rice level is because the pig on the mother works for the so really once you apply to the mother the is fine says and the pigion of the mother is going to work for the uber this is all on a level and the question is we don't want the opinion of the mother to work for the if that's the case so what do we do what do we do with this according to has nothing to do with the accord has nothing to do with the if if you stay status quo but if you're proactive and and you actually understand how to circumvent the system. In this case, there is something you can do. What you can do is you can give it a kaduca the same kaduca that already had before you ped it before you play to the mother and that's going to be it. It says more time and what's time? Time. Why don't we just say that if mido the pig of the mother works for the so what's the issue over here? Let let the just mean we just spoke out that rashi says is all. So if it's all time then why like why would the raan worried in the first place? Why did they just say when you play to the mother you be to the because they didn't want that this animal should be hanging around because what did the Mishna say about this animal it's so if you leave an animal in your backyard and you allow it to do its thing there's a good chance you're going to do a we wanted to get rid of it if is that it has an isab you may breed it you may leave it around so that you can benefit from the children so we said that any child that it gives birth to is going to If that's the case, there's no that's why the rabb went ahead and gave this either had no workound for this. He said that when it says in the means you have to kill this animal as a had with that it already has now you'll be able to be had to understand the word in the said that if you want to be you can be so this was a so the of the was going to have go ahead and give it its own what if I want to make it something else what if I want to make it I want to make it can I do that or can I not do that says it doesn't work just like an animal that has you can't be it already can't give it another you can't be. So too as it relates to this animal you can't be you can give it its own but if you want to give it just like a you can't give it a different so the where it was before the pig and it was born if you want to use before the pion of the mother so that you'll be able to be later you can only do it if it's but if you want to give it a different type ofish that's not something you can This looks a little scary, but really from here until the bottom of there's going to be no it's going to be again we're bringing a price to support what is saying only works. But if you want to be matur something something else that you can't do that that's the ratio of the regular if you do work with it if you share it doesn't matter you don't get malus It's doesn't have a again it's not hectish. If it's not hectish, you treat it like regular and you can you want to be what type of hectish? Any hish. It's here's the rule. You always have to read the fine point. It's stating that there is one where it is. What does that say? What does mitzvah mean? Means you have to be. So if you want to be P mean it's only so if you have to be P there's a mitzvah you have to assess it and you have to follow the protocol of how you assess before you that's the only thing that's as it relates to that is how are you going to be but that's the only you need to know as it relates to treating it with itself that it doesn't have any that's if first it had the then it had what if the or if it had before the came later. In other words, the safe of the is what we need has. You can't be the vlad when it's aim the and you can't just go ahead and give it a because this the of what of the which is also the of our if you want to go ahead now and say you know this I want it to be here's the rule the only thing you could do is eat it but other than that it has so many says the parathetically This love is coming to be something of the ratio which is talking about where the came before the is coming it's coming to be is also like the said what's that coming that is going to be as well but what's the bottom line what do we need from this one thing that if you want to take this and you want to be you can't do that that's said to save this vlad was only to give it the hectish the kadusha that it already has. But if you want to change the kadusha, just like the bakar, you can't give it kadusha. You couldn't do this with this animal either. It's the mish didn't say it, but the said it the which elaborated on the threw in that as it relates to the which is the topic of the second part of the you can't be. One last point sounds like it sounds like that you just can't be but if you want to be you could additionally you can't just be if you want to be you can't be to any animal you want but for that carbon you could isn't this We had what you do with this. The mission said the issu said means you kill it. Nothing you can do with it. What's the you can be and then you wait till it has a then you both said number one the says you could be did it say that? No. It said you can't be from there you could be you could be it also said in the bride so that you could be after now did it really say that no this is important is asking a something it didn't say but the is it seems to be glary it says you can't be poed as a as a but it sounds like if it has a at that point you would be able to be poor is this not really I'll tell you can't be The safe is just going about where it's real can't be but really can't be additionally as it relates to could I make it said where the moon came before the hctish it's regular if it's regular I can make it any carbon I want you can make it but really you can't even make it don't bring from this not like Rafuna exhale on that note just one that is that the first part of today's d and really this is something that underpins the sugis of we had this in the earlier part of the as well is that are treated the says a carbon. And the T says, you can take this carbon and you can eat it however you want to eat it. Anywhere you want. Doesn't matter where in you are. The north, the south, the east, the west, anywhere in you have a right to go ahead and eat it. It has to. The tummy can eat it. The can eat it. And you can eat it the same way you eat in the and those words reverberate throughout these difficulty that deal with because the Tory seems to be saying that we treat even though it's but we treated but the question is what's the say what does the mean to say the we had could you be with a said no because it says and just can't be it has to be so you can't be there's a line of that learned from but what's says you know what the is coming to say the terror is coming to say that this animal is so it's like an can't be a carbon only go don't go so just like and are so that in that's how this is going to be that the Torah is coming to emphasize that as relates to the only not only could you eat it like it's even though it's but I can eat it as it relates to the or the it's now not it is like a does have any element of kadusha whatsoever. No, because has no shades. So just like have absolutely no so too says that's what the prayer is coming to say when it says problem is that it's not so what is saying meaning if you ask a man on the street can you take a and put it on the let it be let it be of you say of course not what's the It's an I'd love to say talked away, but it's not. It's you would expect to find these. In fact, it's somebody takes a and he's on. If somebody would take and he would put it on the he wouldn't be over anything. The Tyra always says that carbon is supposed to be. So there's an it's true the Tyra says many times different types of animals that go on but that's only the mitzvah. What does that mean? That that's only the mitzvah holds that if you want to take a and you want to put it on the you have a right to do it. The Torah always says the mitzvah there's a mitzvah to put on but as relates to the is going to be and the truth is discuss what is saying that don't have any meaning there's no there's no etc when it comes to what kind of demon Does it have it's just that there's no whereas that said no you're not always says but it doesn't necessarily preclude from being allowed to go on the maybe it's more than that maybe it does have and maybe just like a behemer could have kadusha just like a behemer could have kadusha could also have and when someone's it's going to have and if it's going to have the is you'll be able to put on he's very and he says start just speak out one side each way if you're going to tell me that has no there's no kaduca but it's just for if you want to put him put him as What happened to the bazar? certainly can't. So if you can't bring and there's that says how could you take and put it on the this whole concept of saying that is something that contradicts the whole idea of so if you can tell me that has no it's just that if you want to put what are you going to do with that you're going to tell me it does asked a real brisk and that is which kaducas are going to have looking makes a very nice talk about different somebody wants to bring an so an can come from five anam can be af or if you want it could be right it could be from an aim has its types of animals a kas has its types of animals an asham has its types of animals the tyran never mentions since the never mentions If you want to go ahead now and you want to take a you want to bring it as a as a carbon which carbon is it going to be it's not mentioned as one of the animals that you bring as an meaning you can't just say I'm being you have to be a little bit more specific so you have to give it a kadusha you have to give it a name which name is it going to have so he was mching very in the that what name exactly is this hectish of this going to have but the bottom line is we're learning a sug that have no to to him. That's the punch line of the sheb it's there's no way to take this and put on the according to you could put on the and according to one at least in lus and how you're supposed to understand it could be with with a mitzvah like when you learn there's something called right something possible goes on you can leave it there And the of course learned in the year that it's not you could just leave it there. It's there you leave it there. If if there was no you wouldn't be allowed to leave it there means that there's world is it sad that there's really not something that's supposed to go on but there is a concept of of as it relates to either way and really learns it is a lot more and it's something they have to work on a little bit as far as goes to try to reconcile it with but in the spirit of digress ressing something fascinating and it's uh as big a digression as we've ever made but it ties back in and it's it's something very very interesting and that is in this is discusses how you supposed to put your talis on in the morning says as it's proper. The appropriate thing is is that when you're wearing your talis you should cover your head with a talis the to this is the right here in the talis brings the same exact he says and there's a tremendous right there on this to try to understand what the meant the says that when the tour said don't think that what the is trying to tell you is that when and you're wearing talis in filling, you should make sure you're wearing a sounds a little bit like that's what the Torah is saying. Meaning when you're wearing a talis, make sure you cover your head because you're and and you're supposed to wear a yam. So when you're ding, you should make sure that you're wearing a yam says the because if that's what the means, it almost sounds like the Torah is saying that only when you're dabbing do you have to cover your head, but if you're not dabbing, it's not so important. And and the is not true. He brings many rias from your mothers that has to cover always has to wear yamaka. always has to wear. It can't be that the Torah is saying with a while you dominate because it sounds like only when you do. No, you always have to wear. What then does the Torah mean? Tor means something else. The Torah is coming to tell you the tit the most appropriate way of wearing is that's the we make on the means. That's what the is saying you should wear the talis over your head. It's the of wearing the talis but not with while you're wearing your talis with the talis while you're wearing the talis because that's the that's the the proper way to go ahead and wear says the even though there's a mitzvah to listen to the potential saint because who's who's the dark who often argues with the but says the dark even though there's a mitzvah to listen to the but it comes to his understanding anyways of the you know what he means not what the means if you're not wearing there's no toile all it is like the tour himself said in days what's this in days in days the Torah says says as follows. walk around says the Torah is making a he says when it comes to walking the Torah says when it comes to covering your head incidentally the brings as well in sim human base and the says as follows and then he says when it comes to when it comes to covering your head it's the tour's even more subtle says it sounds like it's see if that's the case the said it's a nice thing you should wear you don't have to but it's definitely Definitely an appropriate thing to do. But that's when you're not wearing your talis. When you're wearing your talis, not with the talis. Doesn't matter how you wear the tales. Even though I say you don't have to wear, it's only but when it comes to when you're wearing the talis then already it's in other words. It doesn't get more than this. This these are the most classic sources that we have in whether aid has to wear or whether it's only says very very clearly aid has to wear says it's only and really the context is head where the says that's brought down by the himself understood that it means you have to cover your head with the talis on top of said that what it means is you should wear while you're wearing a but otherwise it's only it's not something that you necessarily have. So what in the world does this have to do with and what does this have to do with with says and it's worth being because the was very sharp and and this is you have to see it to believe it was asked the following question someone who his head is hurting is it okay for him to sit and eat without ring. Is it okay to sit and eat with for someone that's that was the question that was asked in I'm reading verbatim from the I don't know of any that it should be to make without let alone to eat without he says my first my would be that for sure you could eat without covering your head without wearing you could even make and then he says response. He said, "Usually my my custom is not to argue with unless I have a so for that reason I'm being a little bit careful with what I say, but he says, uh, I don't have the whole thing. I'm to think I lost it. I printed it out, but I didn't bring it. I would think that it's not only okay to go ahead and eat and to make a bra without covering your head. But I would take it even a step further. I would say that it's okay to link says the Marshall without covering your head. He says you're going to tell me to lish without covering your head. How is that possible? Right said that when you're wearing the palace you should cover your head. How in the world would it be possible to go ahead and lish? He says I have a raya. You know what my raya is? from a from the says as follows. He says take a look at so good to you is not you know we think sometimes being he says take a look it's a long just read one excerpt it's said when I gave you three were they did take things from you did take things from you no it was just the opposite said everything that you had in the midbra actually came from them was said here's the punch line he was a king who had a he had a a charter he had a doctrine that he wanted the people in his medina to pledge allegiance that every day they should acknowledge who it is is the mel of their medina medina so what the medina do. They knew they had to read this letter. They stood up. They uncovered their head. That was considered cover and they read read it because this is the king and the king said you have to read this letter every day. So how you going to pledge allegiance? You do it with this told I gave you a what's the pledge of allegiance that aid says every single day and I was I never told you I never said you have to stand I never said you have to take your yam off you can do it with your yarmak it's Okay. I said that when it came to I was never I never told you that you have to stand. I never told you you have to take your yam off if you want. You can do it out. You can wear your hat. You do whatever you want. Everything is okay. You could say krishma however you want to say krishma. Says the marshall. It sounds to me that hashem is telling the yen. I wasn't you to take the yamagov. But if you want to take the and you want to link like that, it's something that you're allowed to do. So it says to that if you would ask me, I would say you can eat the rush. You can make a gill. You can even lish. How can you lish? How does that make sense? It makes sense over here. So again, I I printed out some of the wrong papers there, but just says the says the just reading excerpts. Listen to what says. He says, "I heard that people say a woman you find she's not allowed to uncover her hair. The whole idea of not going and then he says you know the says you're not we made the earlier in the but when it comes to the lion is more subtle and he says unfortunately today there are so many people shiny that they would never walk outside talking it's amazing they would never walk outside with who would do that but that they have no problem and he says it's because there he says you're not let go but when it comes to that's already that's says this is what he says afterwards he says that he found he heard about a certain amazing says he said he used to learn what is it was very heavy he says but at the end of the day of course don't go with this because people think it's bad and and don't even but the bottom line is is a fascinating insulin. This is not something that's going to be an issue. So what does it have to do with our soil? We still didn't get to the punch line. I saw that in his in seven days he brings a that heard from a on this from a med to say I said it's not a big deal. He said it's fine. You don't have to. sounds like if you want to you could it's just if you look at the it says one more thing there that we have three of them are more domesticated there seven of the kosher animal that you have to go When I gave you the moment, I was never said go to the mountains and go start hunting a said heard from and he said it's a flaw the same was being as it relates to it says regarding I wasn't sounds like if you want to put on the maybe you would be allowed to put on could you put A HE SAYS OF COURSE not so if you can't put a even though it says doesn't mean anything so how could the say this based on this in the same measures it says with regards to and everybody knows you can't be but the truth is everybody know you can't be it's according to it's true according to it's beautiful it's the same it sounds like the problem is that the reconciles and it comes out at the very end and the truth is not love is always likeish So even though the would work is now you have to do the but could it be that this and something as basic as does aid have to wear yam again we're discussing does aid have to wear yam could it be a either way there's a lot more to talk about we'll see how badly we have to digress tomorrow to know whether we'll come back >> I