Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Krias Shema Questions & Answers - Rabbi Yakov Zev Smith
20 views
Krias Shema Questions & Answers - Rabbi Yakov Zev Smith
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Is this safe?
Christmas.
I'd like to welcome everyone to today's
sh from Smith and show Mrs. Krishma
Krishma questions and answers sponsoring
call 7188518651
or email.com
just
of
what does it really mean
once said it's a mishna the end of
so evidently embodied was the
personification of why so explain Raba
was the one that was called kites and
kites of every and every
the greatest is when you show that
there's not an extra and every nuance
every isra
today's really is ara as we'll see it's
a sug that's neg but you see the way the
pkim discussed the gamorra that every
word of the gamarra and Every every of
the is a different it's besides it's a
I'll explain. Someone asked me a very
simple question. He said he said the
first
and he's certain he had no whatsoever.
In other words, if someone has if he has
OCD and he's anxiety not talking about
that you know that's a different issue.
He has to take care of himself. someone
that's a normal person and he pos
what should he do in other words he was
stuck once but he couldn't ask but then
he want to know maybe for the next time
or if he did right he finished Israel
and he he had no it happens very often a
person comes running into for and they
start already and he's quickly he finds
his sidd and he finds and he closes his
jacket and by the time he finishes he
already said the whole is without
so the question is if you certainly did
not say
based on if he didn't have in the first
and he is qualified to enter the Mishna
if someone doesn't say
the fact that he said the words is
immaterial because he wasn't
so what's the problem let him try again
if you don't succeed at first try again.
What do you do if you do a mitzvah that
you try it again? So what's wrong with
saying again? So it's interesting the
suga of repeating is in giml in
we have a whole different and that is
aishna in
it's also the exact same in both places.
If someone says the whole that's or the
word
but he said twice
now the word is a very strong accusation
as the will soon see why but says you
have to stop him from saying that you're
not going to say twice
and and and
the use the of
That's how bad saying twice is. But the
question
what's wrong with saying twice? It's a
nice
in other words if there's one. So you
say once you saying it a second time
maybe in his cup there's another god.
So he's saying for this one for that one
and that's already
so saying
and
says
he has two gods both of them are phony.
So if he says good twice shows that he's
something very corrupt about him and
we find this in
So Mr. Bur says even if he didn't bow
and even if he said
either way you can't say twice the whole
twice or
the discusses if just the word twice is
bad enough
twice but no doubt about it.
Now you're probably wondering what does
we're talking about right
in both places and add it's not only
so now we have a new concern besides two
the truth is two is worse than two cuz
maiden is a praise schma is kabalis oil
if
oil. That's a very serious fear. They
have to realize in those days there was
a lot of you see in the Mishna about
people put on it was minus and said
something had to stop them from going
there was a very prevalent problem
but this is clear
and now let's look for today.
Now we have an interesting problem. So
if you said without how could you repeat
it? You're becoming
and
stay. So now we have a problem simak
says if you had no kavana repeat and sim
based onar in two places you can't
repeat twice
and this is the challenge but we're not
yet finished because
and again this these these two lines you
see so much of of the the
is
you tell me you say twice
You scream at him.
You yell at him.
Why do you say that?
It says if you repeat it's not
a cave. We'll soon use it. But
so
muna is bad but it's nothing in
comparison to
so make up your mind what is it is it
muna which is bad or mashi which is much
worse that's
so you know the word again a word of
kazal
muna is two different worlds and for the
like
milsa
If if he says in other words he said the
word
is
and he repeats it. He says the word
is also please note. So Rashi explains
also but
he
that's one and as he didn't say
but if he said a at a time
the tunn
now until I learned to I never even
noticed law and le what's happen. We'll
soon see. So we would basically we see
that one is muna
one is much worse and there are two
possibilities what you could be violated
either you said pik or word by word. Oh
so now we'll soon see which is which and
which is worse. But wait we have to
first finish the gumar.
Why are you accusing him?
Why can it be his
that in a weak moment? He said without.
So what do you have to do? Say it again.
So why are you giving him an accusation?
He said he said
now
let's do a beautiful
is asking why you
why you
know we like on people. So you see
someone saying twice
maybe he he's out with he said
he's repeating it right
what are you friends with
so
in say that's a that's a big hammer a
big sledgehammer
So Rashi explains that's the way you say
you don't have hit him over the head. So
I always learned this and what's saying
he said
it again hit him over the head. What
should he do? So the T says the
beautiful
is why do you think he's
maybe don't have in other words it's not
so bad have no you're wrong it's not
saying without is just as bad this is
and this is
which is worse figure it out maybe it's
just as bad maybe it's worse soar is
learning
No li fine. So according to the taz we
see that laisa that with governing
krishna without kavana is as bad maybe
as they and truth doesn't make sense
because if you know the is listening you
don't just drift off without kavana okay
now
what the add you see how everything in
theory theor asked by
why you calling him a kifa Maybe
why the same
because if someone said without it's not
good but you don't repeat the so it's
not even to say that he's repeating but
Israel we have no you have to repeat so
what's so bad
no it's also bad. Now, now we have to
clarify one more point and then we're
going to go and that is very clear.
There's one possibility of which is bad.
But
is even worse. There are two different
ways of violating this is either you say
That obviously would be mish and which
one is not so bad is only I'll give you
a choice is the old worse or is
which is worse? So in I think we could
say it sounds like much worse.
Stop and start again.
is a funny thing is like now what are
you that could be also maybe the the
lion of the
it sounds like you know like it's
not really a but that's the the
so this is the theas
now let's look at rashi so rashi says
So
that's
but it's not
in other words is saying that like we
thought not so bad but then Rashi says
and he adds a very strong point
Right.
You're not being of you're a funny
person. You're making it's comical.
I ser people go and they say over the
words over and over again. He says
that's the way you talk to.
It's not the way you talk to. Rashi says
the same thing is
funny but it's not so serious. You know
what's a serious problem? Is a whole
whole repeating it. O that's something
very suspicious.
So Rashi says Pik
that's the worst that's
okay. Now
according to Rashi Tak the PK is worse.
So so now we're in trouble. This person
said Israel, he finished the P. What do
you do? You can't say again. We'll soon
get back to that. Now to however add and
is quoting the and don't forget to is
quoting the who's called of
and says that the lion that
these
hold just the opposite saying
that's mash
saying is that's
So
just the opposite. Now then
says
the is not like the like the
and the is like that which is better
which is worse if you say the whole but
not so bad. Now the assume that that
agrees to. So now we have
to say that saying the
is and the and the say that saying is
now here's a pel one of the many
experience I saw in this week. You see
the shank could have turned a word
says that that
is like
I don't know where to got it from where
he
and then he adds abbreviation.
Now what does
usually mean?
So it's funny he has to and
so what's what's so it means I don't
think so. So is it he has a cash where
he see like like in in in like
let's go what's so let me tell you an
unbelievable
go in
that is
on this he says something so beautiful
after you hear it you think hey why did
I think of that
why do you call him why do you call him
shaska you know maybe vilma
And that's why he repeated it.
If you learn like Rashi that you said
the Pik and said it again is it makes
sense. He said the first time without
which happens. Second time he says
beautifully that's normal. But what do
you think? You think that that when is
it mishkin? He said, "Oh, of right is o
again."
How how disconnected is he? He said
every single word without kavana and
every single word he corrected himself.
See if he didn't think about it when
fine. But you mean to tell me this
person is so out of out of everything he
said made a mistake every word made a
mistake. It's not reasonable. So
therefore
that's that's
to believe that he said and said again
no I can understand it but the six words
he had six amnesia he forgot about say
it again
one after the other on
that's what the go says so that's
but there's another and this is not in
the this is quoted in the rash but it's
unbelievable if you appreciate a little
bit not too much don't worry But you'll
see.
So the guy points out
is
right. So and says the
that this why is there it says
so.
So what does mean
is
but wait.
So and he says it
law.
So means he repeated the same word on
it is
and it is
and it's
that that that
is only but
the hard
is
then the says tonn
Le pillar pl I don't think anybody ever
noticed the so the first one is
second one lei is and that's so I was
thinking I don't know of course the was
before the go but maybe the saw all
these and said it's
but be that as it may we have this
beautiful
that there are two two wrongdoings
either
or is twice and
is mash like rashi and that is what says
and now we have a now how do we
so we would say what do you mean you
just told me like likeis
not so clear
now why I think it's posit You're
talking about a suffic of
they can't play games. So the Torah
seems to say we treat both of them as a
however the on this tour
he says tois brings the riff and the
bahag and I want to add it's the ram and
the rift also say like the ra and the
so in other words the mab is saying that
the is light
like like the and the I think is
positive
of the
right also the was to look at the three
and take two out of three if two or
three agree follow them here you have
the riff and ra before you start so you
have riff and raam it's a no contest
so
the the tour goes with the safik
And
the goes with the
look and see.
Now this sounds like he's going with the
Torah. that both are awesome. But it
bother me because in if you look at the
the in the in the B inside he says he
seems to say
that
is like
the
so why did he come and say
this both are and that's
so I looked into it I didn't find
anything I knew there something is that
I'm missing and then I saw the the go in
on this and he im he doesn't ask but I'm
bor as the and he says that
says the riff and the the and the the
and the
why so the explains because even if it's
not it's not a mitzvah what is it
minimalist
Muna is also awesome. So the is saying
the was very careful. He didn't say both
are
that's the
what is
what is either it's very bad or bad but
so the go is learning is either or even
so
looked in the mess that's the the goish
goal's
perish on the grow and im
Now
writes in in he says he brings
with what is he going with the
both of
so we have the let's apply this so
firstly I'm going to tell you that in
two places this
and
mr Mr. Bur says never says
twice cuz that's like saying twice
because if it's one bunch why you saying
it twice. So the points out of when
you're
so say the first is quietly and the
second one say out loud otherwise you're
saying
twice. Now there are other have a
different meaning
and says but this is the meaning of
that's the way it should be done the
first says quietly and then you repeat
it for the now what about the question
we began with someone said is absent
mindly and he had no kavana
and before he went to what should he do
so
this is what the taz and the inimak
Gimmel struggle with because in
twice
he says that if he said you have to
repeat the so make up your mind. So
basically here's the of this to say well
I have to say Krishna again otherwise
I'm going to I'm going to be I'm not
is not really justification because you
can't be you can't be have a desire for
that. So, I have an interesting
suggestion. Maybe the whole is of
is when there's someone that hears and
he can tell you be quiet. Let's say
you're saying quietly or let's say
you're at home for some reason. You're
not you're not feeling well. You can't d
with a minion. Is there any problem with
saying
out loud twice?
Maybe if the whole is because
maybe
and the is really cuz I know that I'm
not thinking about someone overhears me
he might get suspicious. So maybe the
whole is
cuz someone's listening
but there's no problem. So then if
that's true I'll go a step further.
Let's say I'm and I miss if I say
I'll say it quietly. No one here. If you
can't hear it, you can't make a problem.
And the this is in giml and also of
course
where he says in both places that the
only is
there's no problem. Now we'll soon see
the Xiaomi and Migill adds by the way he
says
to is like we'll get to that at the end
but let's go by but this is a very
useful
that the is when it's hear it and he has
to react
but if he says it there's no problem in
quotes the lion of the of the verb
So that's a very practical and we could
add
that but if
you say it quiet and the place can say
if you're home you could even scream
twice if no one else is home that is
because there's no problem.
So this is the of the
in two places.
However,
the kasha is and that's the ta's problem
that it's taki
but we don't find in such a so obviously
there's no difference or and if you have
we go to so now all of a sudden the
story changed and says and and and the
even it is us you'll ask me why is it us
no one's
So it's not so hard to understand
whenever
this is
quotes and holds that is the problem
but the holds there absolutely is no
however and this is however the
says
that not only is bey
But even and is if no one hears it can't
do damage and he quotes an earlier
source to say in towards the end that's
a long piece towards the end he was one
of the
who says if you didn't say
in other words he's fully aware of the
problem but if you do
is even in a
now
is saying that we pass like like
bring to you and that I the tour has a
sustain in any place it does say in
where it say
that means someone is is talking loud
enough to hear him and quiet him down.
So we have is the tourist kasha is not a
kasha from the bi and
we could say both and would agree that
and certainly
would be. So now we have a bigger than
we expected not only
but even
and the taz in both places and says this
is the if you didn't say with don't say
it again say it quietly to yourself and
go va
called who says this beish say it and he
says if you're home alone could even
scream Um
twice. So this is the the
and could be
it's not so much
it's it's
saying no. So then you could say if no
one's there or it's quiet is no problem.
So the might be a maybe a more simple
and practical
the is like the says or the says
one after the other. Let's say
so wait a minute a little bit of time
and say it again because the main
problem is if you're talking to one
why do you say it twice? So that's but
if you said something and you paused and
said it again so you're not repeating
the same thing for someone else there's
a why you're repeating it if you talk
were talking to two
you say it but if he said it and and
stopped and said it again there's a
reason
so who says this first this not this is
the
regarding a different question but again
because I told you everything has
The infers
about the by the minute they said the
minute then was and quotes this minute
as well. So it was a meaning that was
not so long ago times that when they
said
in they said
so you kept on saying
so the some say you have to stop the
says the is fine but what's the you keep
on saying and you keep on
In other words,
but if there's a pause in between,
especially other things as well, no
problem.
Gimmel he says the if he's in with
so in other words if you're in and you
want to be
which really is it's based on a the
would be pause wait a minute and say
again the in
regarding saying twice he says we see
in the a lot of times
what's so he says as long as
it's not
so here we see Mr. quotes this in
that if you said without
pause and say it again now what what
what bother me somewhat what does it
mean pause how long a minute an hour so
I'll read you this again says Aik
says
and and Mr. Bur says the isim
but and says
very different between and should and
and should be and so Mr. B does quote he
quotes to Taz and and quotes.
So I guess you have to try to be
impossible. But if someone is
the we saw in the regarding Mr. Bur says
he first says
then he says so to wait a minute or so
if you can't you can't but that would be
for sure. So we have three and I think
the order is the best is no one argues
and
the argues but of the two of course
is a bigger because there's no one there
and if there's no other choice you say
it
or better if you pause that would be an
someone asked and say
he said the word is and oh I didn't have
so but says that's not a problem because
there's nothing wrong
that doesn't mean that means
so if you just said
he says you're allowed to repeat it and
I would add
if you're saying
or you're saying quietly or you pause
then
But
you have to repeat it. So either pause
or say it quietly
this is something that has to be done
the
test. The only issue is if he said
the whole ping but twice is not a
problemma means listen not talking to
two entities. So that's a that's rather
convenient
speaks about
if itself is awesome and it could be a
problem because
is a lot means
so that sounds like two but
you're talking to to is not not there's
no
this is why if a person said he said is
he should start again with
now you can understand you see a new
depth in Israel there's a
that the end of the high point of we say
is once
three times
seven times so to us no why not why
yesis
struggles with this whole meaning
some people said three times and then
three times which makes a lot of sense
because if you say three times
is more important. So the he said it
either twice or three times
you can't do that you can't say
more than once. So it's it's either
and that's objection to this meaning
says a suggestion maybe the is if you're
saying it in the context of which is
so why you why are you saying it twice
but at the end of the is is not is not
now the is a because it's the
today when we have any type of mass
gathering they do the same the same
program so what does mean but
is not so lasting doesn't mean
only say
once so the meaning of saying is once by
by by
is based on our
rush in
says those that say twice he says not
like don't do it he says
you can't do such a thing
it's wrong and this is the in again you
see there was a meaning in the times
So the meaning existed even in the times
that was said twice. However the says we
got to stop this meaning the and
all the say that the mini is not
acceptable. We have to stop the minute.
The has a
fine. So
we don't say
only once. What about the end of we say
three times and
seven times. So someone want to say the
fact that you're doing it
is less of a problem
that in the times of the
frag
you see even if he's saying with a still
awesome the light theor a big is worse
So why is inul better? So here we come
to the next and that is and that's what
says
why do we say seven times why not eight
times why not four times. So this is
based on a cabala
mish but but the quote that the promises
us in the in the
it's going to be and it's going to be
comes down to our to be with us for 10
days now
after it's all over the is going back to
but there are in between our world and
the
So for every oil the person goes up we
say like goodbye goodbye but it's seven
corresponding to seven. So T is reason
since there's a reason why there are
seven times not eight or four it's not
it's exact it's exactly the way you're
thinking seven times for seven.
So there's no problem of repeating it
seven times. So even though is is
definitely
oil but does add we find by
was said three times it was said twice
I'm sorry so we see the of yeah so fine
yeah now the question is what about
why that three times and don't forget is
also part of so the taz makes a simple
bor
is really the conclusion of Israel. If
the Israel was in order it was once so
can't be going back to so it's on itself
it's not it's not so whatever the is
whatever is but at the end of the day
and
explain everything we do is once
three times because it's not cabalis oil
in itself
is kabalis
But it's done to correspond to the shak
I saw beautiful
in the
cotton bay in the in the truth. He said
he had he had a problem was he walked
into a I guess it's like a what they
call the the dominion factories and he
read and heard him saying Krishna. So he
said with him then
on the other side they all said
he said it again and someone tapped him
on the shoulder what about mishask he
said so I guess no one is embarrassed
and he want to know what to do so he
said listen when I'm if if I didn't yet
say kabola so if I didn't say may you
could say it's a problem but lisa I'd
have my but then he add of course much
more powerful the
in the end of B
let's say I dab I'm dabbing with a
minion and I said
and just then another say
so first was my second one was not to ex
be excluded from the so the says you're
allowed to say a second is because
you're doing it to be part of the so
when the first was so the second
problems.
If I walk in after diving and it's
obvious I'm just trying to you know do
what says and
that is I'm sorry
say with them that's not a problem of
next which is in many forms is the
following
and this is in the new print it's a long
came to town
of the and like come people come to want
to watch. So there's one guess a tickle
of a a brazen fellow one of them he hid
in his room he was sleeping to see how
the t goes to sleep I guess he wants
he heard that that kept on saying over
so the kasha is why is that a problem of
so for us the kasha is not so
threatening Because
in all his innocence thought he's he
didn't know someone's under the bed
whatever he's hiding up and that
someone's listening is no problem. But
maybe we could say also when people say
over and over the says you say that to
be able to fall asleep.
It doesn't only mean say and
it means say Israel and go to sleep. If
you can't fall asleep say it again. But
if there's a break in between is there's
no problem. So either is
or the is this new making a but the one
of the
he brings this to you and he says it's a
bit bigger. If you say twice, there's a
problem. But if he said and
then he came back to that's no problem
because there's no was was interrupted
by so
now this all sounds simple but the take
exception to that the
quotes that
it's still a problem because h is also
part of kabala's oil. So the terret he
says is there's a special of
it's not said to be
it's said to go to sleep.
So the is
because of it's not oil. It has a
different identity. It's actually there
to fall asleep.
So now can a person say
over and over in in bed? So look at the
it's beautiful and see if you
this is based on the
however
says no good
even the para based on it he doesn't
seem to accept the of the smack but
definitely The of is Mr. Gura says also
it's not a and every time you say
but the isrishma allowed to repeat it on
the words of the you're allowed to say
it o twice the says but the mo says but
don't say
consecutively there might be a head say
and pause but they say
that remains the serious problem that it
always
Another common question is
a person that can't fall asleep again.
So this is if he makes a break in
between then there's no sh in the first
place. I hope but you see how the focus
in the end of
wonders when there's a there's a mace
that come out of mace but
so the min say over and over and
hopefully
so what's the imam is saying this is the
worst scenario it's a
over and over
So says it's a problem. Maybe you should
break in between then says that he
you're saying it now to be
there's no
and this is not the time for that.
That's for sure. This is a very time. So
the a practical we don't we're not
concerned in this case because it's
clear the intention is
with this important last service
is that of is both and just to show you
again how the were concerned about this
is the there's one time that many do say
twice
and that
soon in
those that do
like says there's a problem. How could
you say is twice the
quotes from the
says it's I'm telling you but it makes a
lot of sense there's no and say the
twice now you want to put the in between
okay that's not really but that would
make a but saying is twice is not is
there's no however for us it's part for
any reason. First of all, often maybe
sometimes you're saying it be number
two, we just saw that if it's if it's
clearly not
there shouldn't be a problem. This is
now
says
that you're allowed to say
at least like
and that's a problem because it is but
in in in
has a discussion about this not just you
know forget about it you have to make
sure it makes sense and his is this
as a
we we see every twice this not different
and he says basically is no problem the
who
says also I don't understand where he's
coming from it's obvious why he's doing
it you you repeat every
the
actually
also says
you're allowed to repeat the there's no
problem. the that's the
says a different that if something is
said
or
that's a problem but something that's
done
is and he adds we'll soon see a very big
in what we do do many times and I'll
we'll soon say that but the the are
clear that saying
is not a problem. Now the says maybe
it's to break in between but there's so
many why should we have to do that but
if someone makes a little break in
between
question someone asked he said Krishna
with minimal but it wasn't it wasn't the
right Krishna he once say it over after
ding again because he wants to have a
mud Krishna doesn't want to go to go go
to work with a a mediocre Krishna so the
there's no problem of
because the whole dab is in between. But
the question is and this in the safety
of action repeal declares are you really
gaining because when you said the first
you have no suffoc you want to make it
so do that tomorrow but once the first
time how to make do the mitzvah again
it's only one mitzvah
every moment a new mitzvah every second
whatever but there's no mitzvah more
than once so this reminds me of the
oldest
they have a sh someone saw a gorgeous
but the said I want to tell you this is
a suffic maybe a small chance 10% chance
it's a I'll give you another one that's
vasha other one v kasha but it doesn't
look like this one so the fell is a
mitzvah he said I'm going to buy both so
he has an that's gorgeous gorgeous but
the other one is but not such a so they
ask so when he makes a which you make a
bra on. So everybody says you can't make
a bra on the one that's make a on the
one that's
if that's the case you wasted your money
because once you
with the so that's it
you want to hold on to the whole day
fine but you're not gaining anything.
So says make a on the
of course have both of them pick that up
first
if this is you got the most gorgeous if
it's not good you're going to the other
one so the same thing here should apply
also once
it's
he says and themes
the belt after they make a on their
they go to someone else they pick up
their
now unless they have it's the same
concern what are you gaining so maybe
there's a new concept there is a shor
even by something that you already so
this per there's no problem at least our
serious problem does not exist the next
question is saying a twice so this is
another beautiful suga because
what's wrong with saying a twice and we
We don't find in the but stay true with
first of all we find in the says in
migilla
is a problem the question is why is it a
problem so the terrorists are very
positive is not just a threeletter word
is kale mel
so ne that sounds to be problematic but
the t quotes the
I don't understand where you got that
from. That's a
but
and I found three place in that we seem
in the end of B in the end of and infin.
So the basis says you see
so now we have a problem says you can't
see twice we find you do so
this is also happens to be also in
this week's para in that the isa says
amen
says Now
twice not like why
and the saying
if you see a has two different people in
mind
could also be two different.
So the go says the main is wrong based
on the in
so the now is that is not worried about
it but there are in
that he says
seven times but don't say twice now
says argues and until we say and he quot
that
there's a special
way twice what's going on here. So the
terrorist is all and that's the way
learns and Mr. where quotes it when you
say a
that's two separate that's problematic
but in tim if you notice all three
places don't say a main a
is not a problem and that's where mrask
he says don't say a and even though the
a
but we
be but not
the
inim wonders what's the head we had it
just yesterday and I'm sorry we had to
talk but you take you say you give me
three times there only one so his his
not you're only saying it withra
not tora the tora heem That's why it's
the
also says this that the meaning is to
say it it's only said to go to open the
and last but not least I must mention
the has a if you said
twice you were on it was loud no break
with that so takes an interesting
approach he says that if he said twice
If you said
and was unbelievable he says if you say
twice so you didn't have but how did the
pass what we'll do is we'll say the
second schma was good the first one was
no good you have a regular but
is mis
he says mis is not so he likes better
but says although says probably mis is
is no good
says no good. The point is it has to
have a sura of a Krishna to
shame
for today's
sponsor call 718851865
want to email.com
Come
on.
Thank you.
God
Okay. In case anyone didn't have enough
we have a
certain we saw in which is like which
says is or
what is so both are wrong. The question
is it seems more that saying the twice
is only saying
that would be
even
but both of them are wrong. The question
is which is worse and therefore it's not
only the says you should not say twice
say the first one quietly the second one
out loud. If someone said with
absolutely no kavana, so there's an aid
to either say it again quietly or pause
and say it even out loud.
That would be okay as long as there's a
pause in between. But just the fact that
you didn't have is not a justification
to be on what's called either mask or
when a the order could probably be it
sounds that pause is the best because
it's not together and
is a question
but is okay and is also okay. Now if
someone
the the
only once by by
three times seven times is very
twice is unthinkable. You can't do that
is only a problem when it when it
follows but if there's one three is not
a problem
seven times that's based on the
ascending and that's why it's not
suspect to any
is only once because you never say twice
the the the some say that that's
and is but as we said others say that
that that both are
has its own either because it's or some
say because he's saying
but the real is that said
is not a problem. The the saying the is
certainly not a problem. It's it's it's
the the the fact that we repeat
a second time is not a problem as far as
the question is if you're gaining if
it's reallying
twice is a problem
should be said
be said three times said and I think
it's
if it's if
It's a
good
two people.
And our main vain is going is is the is
the