0:00 / 0:00
Kli Yakar Weekly Torah Portion Naso Numbers Ch 4 vs 22 first part
193 views
Rabbi Aaron Dovid Poston YIBONEH Midrashiah in Baka, Jerusalem Weekly Torah Portion according to the Kli Yakar - read along with printed material at the following link http://www.yiboneh.com/weekly-kli-yak... Parashat Naso Numbers Chapter 4 verse 22 (first part) Be sure to listen to last parasgraph Subscribe to our YOUTUBE CHANNEL http://www.youtube.com/c/OlamChesedYI... and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgfn... Like us on FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/yiboneh Also Check out http://www.kliyakar.com/
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Thank you for joining us. We're now
dealing with
paraso that can be found in bidbar in
numbers and it's chapter 4. We're going
to be dealing with the second verse.
That's verse number 22 in chapter
4. And it says like
this. Aside from the
first Hashem spoke to Moses
saying take a sentence of the sons of
Geron Gh them as well which is very
strange according to their father's
houses according to their families. Now
we're going to see a contrast. He points
it out later. You can see it now when
all the other tribes are counted. It
says there's a switch. First it says
according to their
families of according to their father's
houses. So we see a switch there. That's
but what's gam what does it mean them as
well. So to little bit of a um an
introduction that in the previous
chapter, right? If you go back from
chapter
4, you go
back first of all the beginning of
chapter 4, we're in verse 22. Hashem
spoke to Moses and Aaron saying, "Take a
census of the sons of Kahhat among the
sons of Ley according to their
families, according to their father's
households." Now we will see a verse
that says by ley specifically you're
supposed to count how the way beneers is
counted first according to their I mean
the way it's
described according to their father's
houses according to their families but
even kahhat is not done that way it's
not done the way it says to count ben
levy although they are beny in fact
they're the first of ben levy that are
counted in chapter 4 verse one. We're in
chapter 4 verse
22. Okay. So, there's a little bit of a
preamble should know that kahhat is not
the first born. It's described in in the
in the in the scripture in the in the in
the in the Tanakh, right? That first Ley
had gon then Kahhat then Miri. And yet
our verse starts the new chapter of
Nasau count
Beng inferring there was somebody else
counted already which if you look back
to the beginning of chapter 4 it's 100%
correct that Benahhat was counted first
and yet they're not the firstborn and
this is what really bothers
the to start with so let's
begin he feels what should have been
done was the counting of of Benet
um Ben Gon in our verse should have been
before
Ben which is in verse one because of the
fact that they're the first
born and automatically he brings in
immediately he brings in this idea of a
medish that will help resolve and solve
the issue that we're being bothered by.
Nimshat because of the fact that the
responsibility was handed over for
carrying the aron the ark to the tribe
of
kahhat. Therefore, the counting of the
ben kahhat came first on account of the
fact that you're giving honor to the to
the carriers of the aon or to the aon
itself. Now, right away he says he
goofashia this itself is a difficulty.
It's nice that you bring in something
that helps resolve the issue why Ben
Gerishon is not counted first and Ben
Kahhat is very nice because they're
carrying the yon. But what it still
doesn't resolve anything because we want
to know the next question, right? Jews
ask a question and they answer it with
another question deeper and deeper down
the rabbit
hole. Aron Elakur. Why in the world in
the first place wasn't the
responsibility for carrying the Aon
given to Gershon to start with who's the
first
born and why would that have been well
would have solved all our problems. We
would have closed the book and and not
had to go on any further. But in fact,
if the responsibility for carrying the
ark which has in it the
Torah, the ten commandments, the
theot and and several other
things that certainly would have been
more honorable and fitting for the Torah
itself and strengthen the Torah
law, which in the very Torah itself
talks about the laws of the firstborn
and why they should be honored.
So he strengthens the question and he
begins to answer it and it's going to be
a long answer but it's very deep and
meaningful. He begins by saying it makes
most the most sense for me to say what
I'm about to
say that God wanted to teach something
very nice. Every letter, every nuance in
the Torah teaches us depths and depths
of insights that
what if you look in Proverbs chapter 3
verse 35 it says honor the wise will
inherit or the wise will inherit honor.
Okay, so we're talking about wisdom.
That's the Torah. We'll explain in a
second.
this wisdom. That's where the honor
should go towards as he
says in order to give instructions to
teach the instructions to the people
that
what that what we should be honoring
those that learn the
Torah, right? by calling those who
sanctify Hashem
honorable. And he
says in order to sanctify all matters of
holiness just like we count God first.
Okay? We're counting God first. Why?
because they carried
this the ark which has the word of hem
in it.
Now if we would have been given right if
God had chosen that the ark would be
carried by the
firstborn I would have said perhaps
mistakenly the only reason that gamon
was counted first was because he was the
firstborn and I wouldn't have put two
and two together I might not have put
two and two together and
and I might not have pinned or hung the
importance of the fact that
they was taking responsibility in
carrying the holy
arkhat therefore it wasn't given to but
was given to carry this
ark and to count them
first and then we should know as a
that all the honor should be given to th
to the Torah itself and to those who
learn
it.
However, interestingly enough, the
author of this medish places this whole
concept, this idea to a verse and this
verse we're going to
dissect. It's a very famous verse. It's
in Proverbs 3 verse
15. She, it's talking about the Torah,
wisdom, is more precious than pearls.
Hebrew, right? She's more precious
than pearls or precious stones. But
we're going to play a a few word games
with the word pin. And we're going to
understand that it has different
meanings. That what it is, this wisdom
or the Torah itself is more precious
than
blank. What could possibly
mean like the Medish
explains certainly his intent is to
teach there's a thing called Torah and
Keterra is he everybody. This is
interesting because it's right before
shis keter tora that's the crown of
Torah is available to everybody this
he's quoting the
ram in
hilusra
therefore and that's the very reason
that the ark was not given to the
firstborn so that it will not be to his
own arrogance his own glory by saying an
roy
I am more fitting to receive the crown
of Torah than anyone
else. But rather the truth is every
single person is equal. Let's say equal
opportunity. It's an equal opportunity
for everyone to excel and to receive the
Torah.
Now we understand why it says we don't
really understand it yet but he's about
to introduce this
major
concept it is more precious
than more than pearls or we don't know
let's just leave it blank it's more
precious than
blank it's more precious than the guttle
who enters into the holy of holies in
Hebrew means the hol Holy of Holies and
it's a play on the words panin. It's
more precious than the one who goes into
the most holy of
holies. Which means the kesser Torah is
even more precious than the kesser
kahuna, the crown of
priesthood. Because the only type of
person that can receive this crown of
priesthood is someone who descends from
the seed of
aron. But to reiterate, the main point
here is that the the crown of Torah is
available to
everyone and everyone can merit from
this. And again, we take the verse and
we're going to play again on the
word. It's more precious than blank. We
think it's pearls. He says mafus. It's
even more precious than Torah is even
more precious
than what does what does the king's
crown have? It has gold and many fine
jewels, precious
stones. In other words, we're playing a
word on pineim. Penina is a pearl, a
precious stone. And the king's crown has
it. But who z who merits in the king's
crown? Only someone who's from the seat
of
David. But when it comes to the crown of
Torah, everyone can
merit. And again going back to the
medishim, right? That it's more precious
than
blank. What is
even from the firstborn. In other
words, we already said, okay, it could
mean the one who goes in to the holy of
holies. That's it could mean pania as
precious stones as in the in the the the
crown of the king. And the kaser tora is
more precious than the king's crown or
the kesser kesser mahut as we as we call
it. And now we're talking about the so
how does fit in with
pineadar says in Ruth and we read this
on
shim is this was a verse if you look in
Ruth verse
4:7 is that this law was an old I'm
sorry this custom was an old custom in
amongst the Jewish people. So we
translate lefim as first. This was one
of the original laws. This was one of
the original customs that Jews did from
time and memorial. So means
first, right? And and what's the what
are we relating this to? The firstborn.
The whole concept of firstborn is only
relating to someone who was actually
born
first. But the Torah itself, everybody
merits in it
equally. Again, what's the bakore? This,
as I mentioned, there's a switch.
There's a there's a a redemption and a
transfer of the powers. Originally, it
was the Bahour that was supposed to
serve in the tabernacle as the priests.
And as a result of the sin of the golden
calf because every tribe had
um firstborns that were involved, they
lost that merit and it was transferred
over to Beni who were not involved in
any way, shape or form with the sin of
the golden calf. the var he gives two
short
explanations meaning alternative
explanations to everything we just said
above
why did not merit to carry the aon and
he
says another reason alternative reason
that it was not given the responsibility
of carrying the aon to the firstborn
being geishon was shalot zak
In other words, he shouldn't become too
hotty through this
responsibility. And some say another
reason why it was given to
[Music]
the
moshabor that kahhat is the one right.
You have
um you have
Amram. Sorry, you have Ley and then you
have
Kahhat and then you have Amram and then
you have Moses and Aaron. So Moses and
Aaron are from the tribe of Gahhat. And
because they were the ones that received
the Torah, so their tribe should carry
the responsibility of moving around and
carrying the Torah itself which is
inside the holy
ark. Okay, the next paragraph
gam. Now I mentioned these words sounds
very strange. What does it mean as well?
So I mentioned that previously you had
kahhat already counted. So
He says these two words actually seal
the deal. They seal the
concept
saying that no matter what this is going
to be the way it is that you should
always count at least in this right in
this particular case you can't change
it. God said do it. You have to do it
exactly like this. Now you might sound
might sound very strange what I'm
saying. Of course, if God says do
something, you're supposed to do it. I
have a I have a news for you. We see
that there's not always the case and
good reason, too.
So,
Ben, and only afterward you should
count, right, and take the senses for
the
Benon them as well. That's what the
verse says. If it wasn't like that, if
the P did, if the verse did not
say them as well, I might think not to
do like that.
Explain. So if it was not for the verse
telling me
this certainly would have been possible
to think
differently, I would have thought, what
did God want? Even though he said
count first, I might have thought that
really he wants me to count Ben
first because I got to remember he's the
first
born. Now what is what is the reason and
from the fact that the command actually
did come to first
count I might have thought it wasn't
really to actually count him first but
the command came
first but I might have thought it was
only the command it was just because of
the importance of the fact they were
carrying the aon that they were
mentioned first. Not that I have to
count them
first. We actually find a very similar
concept when we have the actual command
and the building for the tabernacle
itself from the start. You know what it
says? If you look in Exodus
25:10, there's a command to right to
Moses and Betal and it
says that they shall make the ark of
Aacia wood. That was the first command
seemingly and only later it says they
shall make the Mishkan. The Mishkan
should be made. So what was first
command? seemingly that they should
first make the Aon and afterwards make
the Mishkan. But what do we find in
actuality
also? But in reality in the in the
actual making of it al who is the head
artisan craftsman he first made the
mishan and only afterwards the the
vessels and what he had was on a very
high level of what called ru kodesh of
the holy spirit and prophecy and
intimacy and the knowledge of god and he
knew to do the opposite meaning first to
build the t the the housing, the tent,
the tent of meeting, the mishkan, and
then do the kaim because if you did the
ka, where would they sit? It wouldn't be
very respectable, I don't know, the
weather and whatnot. But it doesn't make
sense to him. And he did the opposite
and that was correct.
So you would have come out to think that
certainly just the fact that the was
mentioned first because of
the not necessarily
um actually we're still talking about
the story. So the fact that the was
mentioned first
look not that it was originally made to
be made first. It was put first to be
made first.
But it was only on account of its
importance that it was placed first. But
in the actual making it was the
opposite. So me the clear is going to
say the same thing. Perhaps over here by
I'm going to say to count them first
because they're carrying the but in
actuality I'm not going to count them
first. So
I'm you know what I would
say on account of the honor for the ark.
is carrying the
responsibility. So, first I'm going to
place the
responsibility, right? Um um I'm sorry.
I'm going to count them first. But you
know
what?
Mosha Lisa s Rosham. But but really when
Moses went and to count
them but when Moses actually comes to
count them he goes ahead and counts the
the firstborn first. So this was all
what I might mistakenly
say that's why our verse comes and
teaches
us count make the senses with also as
well. So what does it come out and teach
us in the end? What is in verse says
that really you must count first the
children of God and only
afterwards and only afterwards count the
heads of
Benon because anytime the word is used
it's it's always coming to add something
on what was originally said and since
you have the command to count them first
that's how it's done And only then you
then count
bench. And now the next paragraph, the
bottom paragraph of the page no. Now for
the fact that we say no. Now no means to
count to
raise use it as a census.
Now the word nos is actually used when
the command to take the census by the
children of Gahhat and the children of
Gisham. But I mentioned that there were
three brothers Miri. But when it comes
to Ben Miri, it says something else. It
says here, let's look it up. It's
429. 429
says code. Count them but a different
word. Now no say I said means to raise
up and tiff code means to count has
obviously other deeper meanings as well
but there's something not balanced. You
have three sons that are beny. You're
going to count all of them and yet the
same word is not used. You have to find
that strange. And what's the difference
between no say and tiffco? So let's
start
again right the word no is used by the
two sons and gon but by the third no lo
viv marari if you look again if you want
to know the different verses four
chapter 4 verse1 that's by ben kahhat no
is used by our verse that's four uh
chapter 4 verse 22 no is used by ben ger
And in
429 by Mari it says tiff. And
why? Because those two brothers had an
advantage or some type of a a status
that was higher than their third
brother. And what was
that? As we mentioned, Gahad had the
responsibility to carry the holy ark.
Gon what was his advantage or status
that was
different from the fact that he was the
first born of
Lei and
furthermore the fact that the two of
them carried something different
materials that were much uh holier they
had a higher status
um than Benet Mariri for example
Bahhat they carried all the vessels and
in included in those vessels was the
holy
ark you know the altar the minora and
whatnot what whatnot and when it came to
the benchon they were carrying all the
curtains and the tent material and
beneri they were carrying all the the
pillars and the planks the bars and the
sockets okay so the clear points out
that there's a difference in holiness so
The this is another reason why so is
used by the first two brothers and not
by the
third because that was more inferior
than the rest meaning who was only
carrying the pillars and the bars and
the sockets al
therefore therefore the the concept of
being raised up was not used in the term
for counting or
consensus shop here and through this
it's it's going to come out fine
according to what we had a problem with
gam when it says them as well when you
say gam you're equating the second
brother with the first brother and
leaving out the third brother from that
equation
amar gamos now it says gam it doesn't
say gamos
meaning gam would have included the
nameari because that's plural gam also
them as well as opposed to just as
well. So why does it say
um and it doesn't
say
hello what they didn't have um any type
of special
virtue? No, they could also they were
also had an aspect of being appointed as
head. We're talking about because they
were theor because they were the
firstborn. Korakamar because they were
the firstborn as we had already
mentioned. Okay, I'm going to mention
that we had a little bit of a technical
difficulty so we had to really retape
this class. If you continue to the next
part, you hear the rest of this part.
Shabbat shalom and hagame have a a real
aliyah on this of shu a real kabala as
we mentioned Torah is available to all
of us we're all equal in it and we
should all have a real full healthy
complete of a just bonus of Torah a
receiving of the Torah and we could then
incorporate in our lives and make a
real a real fixing in our own lives and
um in the world as well. So, Shabbat
love and h