0:00 / 0:00
Is The Torah Cruel? - The Parshah On Fire - Matos/Masay
22 views
The Torah seems to have an inclination towards violence from its very beginning to its very end. Why is that? I thought the Torah was supposed to be a beacon of mercy?
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
[Music]
If you were to look at the Tyra with a
bird's eyee view, you would find that it
seems to contain an unexpectedly strange
attachment to violence. In the very
second para of the entire Torah,
humanity at large was acting below
Hashem's standards and it just prompted
him to exterminate the entire human race
with the mobble the great flood. Men,
women, and children dead. Just a few
parios later, the city of Saddam was
acting in a way not approved of by
heaven and the city was completely burnt
in a sulfur firestorm. Again, men,
women, and children dead. Next, we read
about how Kamar, the prince of Sham,
went ahead and violated Dena. The men of
the city were cunningly told to
circumcise. And then, while recovering
in bed, they were all slaughtered, every
single one of them. Then we read about
how the sons of Yakov plotted and nearly
executed the murder of their own
brother, Yoseph.
This is not exactly a book of
butterflies and cupcakes. And the
violence doesn't stop there. We were
given the commandment to hunt down
descendants of Amalik and annihilate
them. We were charged with eradicating
the seven Cananan nations inhabiting
Eritis, an effective ethnic cleansing of
the previous dwellers of the land. And
finally, in this week's para, we are
instructed to wage a vengeful war on the
Midyan nation and kill all men, women,
and children.
Aren't the Jewish people supposed to be
merciful? Don't we pride ourselves in
our kind-heartedness and humaness? Isn't
a Jew's ability to show mercy one of the
three foundational traits that sets us
apart?
Why do we seem to take a very militant
approach in dealing with our enemies?
Aren't we people of the book, not people
of the sword?
Hashem commanded us to kill every last
midyani male including the male infants
and all females with the physical
ability to have intercourse were
likewise killed. So the garam samak
explains how it was possible to
determine which female children were
able to physically cohabitate and which
weren't. So they would march a girl in
front of the coain's breastplate and if
the girl did in fact have the ability to
cohabitate her face would turn green.
Can you imagine the scene? You have a
three-year-old girl. She's screaming on
top of her lungs, crying and pleading to
be spared. We march her to the coain.
Her face turns green and we grab her. We
chop her head off. How does our claim to
be the beacons of mercy and morality
explain this? Doesn't this sound eerily
similar to jihadists that attack us
relentlessly?
How does our claim to be the flag
bearers of peace and harmony not utterly
clash with the Torah's seemingly
frequent promotion of violence?
A a deeper explanation of these
commandments beyond their superficial
understanding not only offers us a
significantly less violent
interpretation of the Tyra, it offers us
a refreshing glimpse of the Tyra's
unparalleled mercy. Let's begin at the
beginning. We believe that the world is
created in order for Hashem to bestow
goodness on us. Hashem doesn't need us
to do mitzvah. He doesn't need us to
blow chauffeur and shake lulof. He
created the world for us to achieve
goodness. In turn, we are charged with
spreading morality and harmony
throughout the world. Thus ensuring that
Hashem's definition of goodness is
actualized the world over in its fullest
form. The problem was that the
conditions of morality in the world
slowly deteriorated until 1600 years
after creation. Hashem had enough. The
general society of the world and its
barbaric tribes were living lives of
lawlessness and moral bankruptcy. Mor
mor morality had broken down to an
incredible gruesome extent. So much so
that the absolute most merciful thing
Hashem could have done for the future
inhabitants of the world was to wipe out
the current humanity and just start
over. Much like we understand the
killing of a terrorist on route to
stabbing an innocent mother holding a
baby is merciful. So Hashem also showed
only mercy by extracting the evil from
the world. thus saving the billions of
future people from being contaminated by
this immoral way of life. Then came
Saddam. Saddam was not merely a city
bereft of morals. It was a city that
threatened and intimidated others into
following its morally bent way of life.
Therefore, being that Hashem's ultimate
goodness is only manifested in
accordance with his rules of morality,
life is really bad when there are
murderers and idolattors and adultery
everywhere. So the Sudan the the
inhabitants of Saddam who grossly
inhabited that way of life had to be
eliminated not because Hashem was trying
to be cruel to Saddam rather because he
was having mercy on the rest of the
world.
The Rambam in Malimal
writes that when Shim and Levy got up
and killed the city of Shrem they were
not acting as gruesome jihadists. The
city in its entirety had watched as
their prince violated the helpless Dena.
And not only did they knew nothing about
it, they celebrated it as an opportunity
to make a pact with the family of Yakov,
the people in the city were
demonstrating a complete disinterest in
a life of laws of or proper conduct.
Shimon and Ley knew that not only was
this an awful way to live, this was a
cancerous way of life that can spread to
others and wreck havoc in the whole
world. Showing mercy on those who
violate others and their sympathizers is
in essence showing cruelty to the scores
of victims that they will one day prey
upon. Shiman and Ley could not tolerate
such behavior. They were too merciful
for that.
When the Torah commands us to wage war
on Midun and Cananan and Amalik, it is
not an ethnic cleansing crusade. We are
not against those particular nations per
seam.
We are rather against what they
promulgate. We are only against the
immoral and unethical habits that they
celebrate. We don't just grab our spears
and begrum the city. According to the
Rambam, we are required by law to first
ask for peace before every war. We are
required to attempt to inspire our
enemies to change their ways. Even
Rashi, who maintains that we are not
required to ask our enemies for peace,
only holds this in a war mandated by
Hashem, a mu mitzvah. when it comes to a
war that we choose to wage on our own.
And Muhammad Rush Rashi agrees. We are
required to ask for peace to beg the
inhabitants of that city to change their
ways to become good people. So
uninterested in bloody warfare were we.
We would never surround an opponent on
all four sides when waging war. We would
always leave one side open for the enemy
to retreat and change their ways. Can
you believe it? This is something that's
almost unheard of in the history of
military tactics. When attacking the
midonim and paras matos, it is
abundantly clear that the Torah has only
one prerogative.
Removing adulterers, adulterous behavior
from that part of the world. Thousands
upon thousands of Jews were scandalously
seduced by minion women who wanted only
to revel in watching Jews sin. They used
adultery as a weapon to spit in Hashem's
face. And Hashem would have none of it.
Not because he wanted revenge, not
because he is violent. On the contrary,
precisely because the world is a better
place without adultery. He tasked us
with weeding it out. If that meant
killing any girl who was able to
continue the midjudi mentality of
adultery, then so be it.
The biggest proof that Hashem's sole
interest in waging these battles is the
complete eradication of morality from
the world is the fact that he gives us
Jews the very same warning he gives the
other nations of the world. If we act in
a morally corrupt way, we too will feel
Hashem's wrath. We see this clearly in
the laws of Iranas, a weward city which
must be raised to the ground. We are
charged with destroying a city filled
with Jews if those Jews have lost their
moral way. Those Jews can be our
siblings, our relatives, our friends. It
makes no difference who they are. Hashem
commands us to destroy. It sounds cruel.
It's interesting to note that one of the
only times in the entire Torah Hashem
mentions mercy is in his promise that
those that wage war against the will not
subsequently become cruel people. They
will be rewarded with heightened mercy
of others. This is impartious.
By demonstrating the ultimate mercy, by
weeding out the weward city, by removing
that behavior from the world, by sparing
the countless victims that these people
might pray upon, Hashem rewards those
individuals in kind with heightened
mercy.
Hashem requires us to carry on lives of
love and compassion, even while waging
war on our enemies. Failure to do so is
met with Hashem's wrath. David Amel was
not granted the rights to build the bas.
You ever wonder why? Because despite
only waging wars that were mandated by
Hashem, he on his lofty level did not
display enough internal mercy while
fighting these wars. And that according
to
according to the interpretation of the
that is the reason why lost out the
right to build the
Torah is the blueprint to a moral
ethical and merciful world. Those three
ingredients fill the world with
goodness. We are tasked with promugating
them as well as weeding out those that
don't. Not out of love of violence, out
of sheer mercy for humanity. No nation
in world history can claim to be as
merciful as the Jewish people. The
numerical value of the word mercy is
raim and the name of our forefather Aram
is the same at 248.
Mercy runs in our blood. While nations
of the past were steeped in immorality
of the worst degree, the Jewish people
by and large were holding Hashem's torch
high and shining it light to the rest of
the world.
One doesn't need to look very hard to
find examples of Hashem's muddied
morality and cruelty. For a sad majority
of world history, only up until several
decades ago, handicapped people were not
only dealt with unkindly, they were
often burnt and hung and strangled to
death. Huge numbers of countries
throughout world history, including the
majority of sophisticated and developed
ones, believed that infanticide, the
killing of unwanted babies, was morally
okay. Both Aristotle and Plato believed
in it. Between the years 1500 and 1700
alone, an estimated 8 to 20 million
women suffering from mental difficulties
were put to death. 8 to 20 million. The
Egyptians built their cities while
throwing babies into the Nile. The
ancient Chinese Empire built the Great
Wall of China while mixing prisoners and
enemies into the very cement that built
that wall. The Romans entertained by
themselves in their coliseum, watching
thousands of innocent people get killed
by bears and lions and gladiators.
Child sacrifice, perhaps history's most
grotesque example of its immorality and
ethical decay, was found all over the
world. The Mayan, the Toltech, the
Aztec, the Mech, the Chimu, the Inca
tribes all practice child sacrifice on a
disturbingly large scale. Archaeologists
in 2005 discovered mass graves of one
and two-year-old children who had been
sacrificed at the base temples of
Kamakalo. The Skati band of the Panei
tribe as recently as the 1800s conducted
morning star ceremonies in which a young
girl was kidnapped placed on an
elaborate scaffold and when the morning
sun was due to rise the girl's chest was
cut open while onlooking men shot her
with arrows. This is not something that
exists exclusively in history books and
the world has come a long way.
Modern-day Uganda, Mazambi, Mali all
continue to practice of ritual killing.
In the city of Kala, businessmen pay
huge sums of money to a quote unquote
healer who abducts a child, murders it,
and then places the body underneath the
foundation of their building as a good
luck to their gods. Utterly despicable.
The Tyra abhores such behavior. The Tory
states unequivocally that we are never
to give our children to mole as a child
sacrifice. And the Torah does not
elaborate because it doesn't need to.
For such behavior is the very antithesis
of the Torah. The Torah brought mercy
into the world. It introduced humanity
to novel concepts like having a fair
trial or being kind to one's slaves. It
taught the world to the proper way to
treat women and foreigners and children
and handicapped people and elderly and
widows and deaf and blind. The Tyra goes
to tremendous lengths to ensure that we
remain the most merciful human beings on
earth. We are required to take care and
visit the sick. Unlike lots of ancient
and not so ancient cultures that would
simply kill the sick and mentally ill.
The Torah tells us numerous times to go
out of the way to feed the poor and the
needy. The Tory even requires utmost
mercy on animals. We are forbidden to
cause any undue pain to any animal. We
can't slaughter a cow the same day our
calf was slaughtered, which the explains
is because of the undue pain caused to
the animal and the insensitivity it
would foster in us. We cannot take the
eggs of a bird while the mother bird is
watching, which many commentators
explain is because of the pain it would
cause the mother bird. If we sit down to
a meal and our animal hasn't eaten yet,
we must feed that animal first. The
Tyra's absolute insistence that we lead
merciful lives is what created a nation
that is completely fueled by mercy. We
have organizations that help those in
financial trouble and help struggling
teenagers. We have ones that help people
going through postpartum depression and
help those struggling with infertility.
We have organizations that help people
with flat tires and organizations that
help people who lost a relative. If
there's a need for something, there is
an organization that is out there to
fill it. Jews were the largest
percentage of donors of plasma during
the COVID epidemic. Israel is almost
always the first country to send
humanitarian aid to a country suffering
from a disaster, even if that country is
an enemy of Israel.
Ellie Beer, the man behind United, has
helped hundreds of countries in
quickening their emergency medical
response time, effectively saving
millions upon millions of lives every
year. And this is in addition to the
thousands and thousands of individuals
who without fanfare or attention take it
upon themselves to visit the sick and
encourage prisoners and cheer up the
elderly or raise money for every cause
under the sun. Not to mention the
hundreds of groups of people who take it
upon themselves to pray and shed tears
for those who are suffering. One can
only look at the Jewish people and be in
sheer awe of the mercy that flows
through their collective veins.
Jews are never charged by Hashem to be
cruel. It is precisely our commitment to
mercy that propels us on occasion to
weed out those that promugate cruelty.
The history of Jewish ritual slaughter
is a dramatic example of the Jewish
people's steadfast commitment to mercy
at all cost. In September of 1893, the
country of Switzerland became the first
government to formally introduce a
legislative ban on Shita of animals.
Arguing that it was immensely cruel and
insensitive to the animal, the Swiss
were out to ban it entirely. And thus
began a long and systemic crusade to
label Jews as a cruel and merciless
people who revel in the pain and blood
of animals.
spreading like wildfire. This anti-shita
tactic became quite popular in Europe
and as the perfect pretext for attacking
Jews on the grounds of being cruel. This
continued with bans in the kingdom of
Saxony in Bavaria in February of 1894
and in Schwarzburg in July 1897 and in
the German Reich stag in 1899.
On April 21st 1933, the Nazis outlawed
in the entire country. Theodore FR
explained and promoted the Nazi
proposition in his book Hanbok to
Judenfra which published 39 editions and
200,000 copies by the year 1935. And in
it he wrote quote the Jew denies the
existence of cruelty in ritual
slaughter. Considering that the Jew has
no mercy for human beings, it is
unsurprising that he possesses no pity
for the animal. End quote. One of the
greatest ironies in all of human history
was the fact that the Nazis were fanatic
animal lovers. Utterly obsessed with
animal welfare, Germany had the
strictest and most far-reaching animal
protection regulations in the entire
Europe. A German caught abusing an
animal will be sent to a concentration
camp as punishment. As Joseph Gobles
wrote in his diary, Adolf Hitler was a
vegetarian and a passionate animal
lover. Think about that. Adolf Hitler
was a vegetarian. He also said that
Hitler was planning after German victory
in the war to ban animal slaughter
slaughter houses altogether. The Nazi
ban onita in 1933 effectively halted the
consumption of meat for the Jews in
Germany. So scores of Jewish people
protested and campaigned that was in
fact a humane method of killing animals
for beef. These complaints fell
unsurprisingly on deaf ears. The Germans
required knocking the animal unconscious
before butchering it, a method
prohibited by Torah law. The Jews looked
to neighboring countries to import meat,
but the Jews the Germans banned all meat
from Poland and Lithuania and
Czechoslovakia and Hungary and
Yugoslavia and Romania. They were stuck.
So the German Jews attempted to find a
new method that would satisfy both
Jewish hala and German law. Because the
German legislation did not ban shrita
outright, but only required the animal
to be rendered insensible prior to the
German Jews experimented with various
stunning methods that would not make the
animal a traifically
terminate terminally ill animal which is
forbidden to eat. They experimented with
electrical shocks and nitrogen
inhalation which were both found to be
unsatisfactory by the leading German
rabbis of that time. And one day a
breakthrough was discovered by a man
named Bruno Kish, a professor of
experimental pathology at Cologne
University and he used an a an injection
of unicron which both rendered the
animal unconscious but carars no harm to
the animal whatsoever. The method went
through extensive testing and seemed
likely to get the support of the Hakik
authorities of the time and ecstatic the
German Jews called together the rabbis
to discuss this method and hopefully
allow its widespread usage throughout
Germany ending the poor's Jews der of
meat. But alas, in November of 1938, as
the date of the meeting was drawing
near, an outbreak of violence occurred
near the homes of the meeting attendees,
gently discouraging the meeting from
taking place. The Nazis were not
interested in finding the most humane
way to slaughter beef. They were looking
to slaughter Jews. Cutting off their
meat supply was a step in the direction
of slaughtering 6 million Jews. a bunch
of rabbis and a sympathizing scientist
would not be allowed to get in their
way. And 6 million deaths later, the
atrocities of the Holocaust eventually
came to an end. And although the Nazi
political party crumbled, some pre-war
ideologies survived the Nazi defeat. And
one of them was the anti-hittita jewels
are cruel to animals idea. And in modern
day Denmark, is only allowed in the
presence of a statelicicensed
veterinarian as well as in Ireland and
the Netherlands and in Finland and in
Spain. To this day, religious slaughter
is banned entirely in Switzerland and
Norway and Sweden on the basis of Jews
are cruel to animals with their
as the debate
raged on throughout Europe, constantly
being used as a club to knock the Jews
on their heads. There were individuals
who were fed up and decided to put it
through a test to show once and for all
the world. The department of
veterinarian veterinarian medicine of
the university of bari gathered together
in Valenzoro Italy and performed a test
referred to as the Alisa test which was
able to determine the exact plasma
cortisol levels in an animal while going
through the process. They would
essentially hook up an animal to a
device and it would determine how much
pain the animal was feeling and for how
long. And what they discovered shocked
the world. The traditional stun gun
slaughter process caused more pain to
the animal than did the Jewish way.
Finally, the world had tangible evidence
that an animal experiences less pain for
a shorter time withita than any other
method. This shocked everybody but the
Jew. For the Jew knows that there is no
more humane way of life than following
the life described by the Tyra. It was,
is, and will forever be the ultimate
authority on defining mercy. Even the
Tyrus command to wage war is not a
crusade using violence as a way to shove
a religion down the throat of others. It
is a charge to ensure that universal
mercy is what reigns supreme. The
difference between Jewish ritual
slaughter and the world's method is a
mere few seconds of pain. And yet, the
Tyra in the strongest manner forbids us
to use their slaughter methods. Why?
Because for us, a few seconds of pain is
too much pain. And being the most
merciful people on earth, no amount of
pain is ever overlooked. Call us
outdated, call us cruel, the world will
one day see who are the only merciful
ones left standing.
In 2002, the FBI published its annual
violent crime report. The city with at
least 100,000 inhabitants that
experienced the least violent crime was
Lakewood, New Jersey. The city with the
highest concentration of Torah Jews in
the United States is Lakewood, New
Jersey. Coincidence? I doubt it.
[Music]