Apartment Rental Questions - Rav Yakov Zev Smith

like to welcome everyone from apartment rental questions is dedicated father of the board members of Ru wolf and M wolf sponsoring to 71851 8651 email.com har Smith today our neighborhoods are bursting at the seams and there are many people moving in and there as we know is a pretty severe shortage of either rentals or homes to to be bought and we hear a number of shist sometimes a little upsetting how how the people are a little too aggressive to get the apartment to get a house someone just told me there was a house for that they put up for for sale and there's over 50 biders and of course the price goes up and up and the money and the it only goes to the guy that's selling but the point really we have to try to discuss today is that when is there a problem as far as taking someone else's home that he wants to buy or rental and other suchas and I must say even if you're not into real estate and you're not selling you're not buying you're not renting you have one family house this is really one of the big Su in but actually it's two of the big sugas that's Naya other areas as well could be Naya taking someone else's parking spot taking someone else I heard a sh someone asked he was like o men someone stole his wife's cleaning lady you know that's like a so basically it's a big but specifically it's the Su of taking someone else's thing which might be theirs the EM is that really what it makes sense before someone does business he should learn just like someone can't be a if he doesn't know a person can't do business he doesn't know but until that happens we'll have to learn after SU let's start with a very simple question someone saw an apartment and he he liked it he didn't make a Kenya yet what's wrong if I and I need an apartment if I go and before any deal was made and I offer the landlord a little more money in other words if he signed the lease if he made a Kenyon so a Kinyon is is it fully binding don't forget and we'll soon see that really a least technical is not a Kenyon unless you structure it differently but basically leas isn't is a contractual agreement to make a Kenyon but laa if there was a Kenyon of course then you can't reneg on your commitment that's wrong even if there was not a Kyon but if the landlord gave a word even in English a word is a word and we'll soon see how much meaning goes into those simple words aort is aort but we see how kazal really wanted us to honor every commitment the famous tells a story of sa had a say that an item that he was trying to sell someone came to him and it seemed like it was a GU because Safra was saying krishma and this person offered him a price for the for the purchase so of course saf saying kishma ignored him and then the other fellow who wanted to buy it hiked the price I'll give you double whatever it is so after saffra finished daving he said listen you offered a first price at that moment I thought it's I'll take it but I can't because I'm saying I'm D saying krishma and I'm going to keep the first offer that you gave me even though you offered honestly a second offer not only if he gave a word but even a thought even our thoughts have to be em now although this is not but both write that should even keep his no okay that's but but the EM is we see a different it's actually and it's quoted doive and that is that if someone made a Kenyon he gave money to buy an item now I don't want to get into the details now but really and he paid for the item it's a Kenya but said the K should not yet take place whatever the reason is so he made a but it wasn't yet and then he wants to back out because he has a gooder the Kenya wasn't so the that that's an now it sounds pretty holy like you like a but m is frightening nothing less than frightening says if someone went through this commitment even though there was no real Kenyan o curses him and they say whoever punished these the worst societies gives him this swapping CLA of the first four worst Societies in history but as if this not bad enough the says no no the didn't say it right not you know he comes to the bz bz is talking third person about you know yenim he's not from the yanites no no no we mean you one day he's sh and now he's getting cursed like the worst Societies in history in fact say has to be a but there's a different level which is really more today and that is even if there's no Ken at all a mere oral agreement the fact that they both agreed the tenant and landlord agreed to this price so says based on this once there was a commitment if someone wants to back out even though he's allowed to back out because there was no Kon it was just a verbal agreement this is lacking trust he's not trustworthy he's lacking them on now there's no Kenya that's true but you gave a word both parties gave a word what is this what is the source of this again if there's no Kenyon why can you make such a frightening Al so and point to in other words you're right you're not reneging on a on a Kenyan there was no Kenyan but you gave a word and that's an A and by eating that's a not keeping a word is is a AA now some feel really based on the that it's it's a and even so the your has to be a h your yes has to be a yes and a no is a no now the empis you look in the in the beginning of he says it's if this is if it's a so as points out it's the which is more than a but if it's based on a so then then then a person that doesn't keep his commitment although there was no Kenyan and that's why it's a you could be it's not it's not so P if you hold but no doubt about it we have two categories that we have to be wary of if there was a Kenyon made even if it wasn't then there's a frightening but in our case usually there's no on an apartment but this minimally this the concept of you gave a word you have to keep the word but today there was none of the above the tenant saw the apartment the landlord said okay let's we'll talk about it why can I and more so I'm a l I'll say you know he needs an apartment I need apartment a critical shortage of apartments and I'm not stealing I'm paying in fact I'm even offering the landlord more money the landlord's happy and I'm happy so if he's not happy so here we come to a different gar and it's actually a scandal in thear K but it's very very important for our today says thear this is it's an interesting word used means he's tossing it over but m in this context means he's trying to get something Rael was looking into buying a land real estate R ABA and as the later explains was unaware of R G's involvement and he bought the land he just went straight to the and bought the land R went to complain to who went to was a re of ABA and he says your talit Ed someone's purchase big was a little shocked okay wait he come to me to I'll take care of it so when he came to he came to asked a poor person is tossing a cake that's rash says is a cake but on is tossing a cake obviously trying to be C it and someone else comes along and what would you say so says what and he didn't know he pass in his own fate she goes so why' you do it goes do what and the whole story he said well I didn't know I didn't know someone was there first so we see that basically Russ as in you know they you allowed to soon he wor you're allowed to but bz calls him aash now the only had that R had he P didn't know in fact the say if he didn't know so give it back but said it wasn't going to work out he wouldn't take it back but one thing is very frightening even though there was no formal opinion and there wasn't even a formal agreement but when someone is seeing something first give him a space give him a chance if he doesn't want to take it then you could move in and take it and this is in a little not whether it's if someone preempts him and it that he did in other words maybe till today he was a Shan e you know like they say a story The fell what are you a or he goes no no no I'm ay see some people theyy well that was yesterday today he became a Russia in's a Russ the end of says could to stop from doing this says this is a r that's possible for and what's the because someone else saw it first and there's a certain amount of Yash that every has to have the the marit famous marit and K on this gor he quotes from an earlier source that this is the a is based on a a person the worst thing is a person that someone else's so the you look at the there the quotes the a little later when someone someone else's thing in a beautiful very very he writes on this that means this person this not just a all of all of it's not just unethical but a person is living with riches and that's the concept of says there's a different source for this and that is the and once you mention that it it should give us a different sensitivity because don't forget the in the requires us which basically we have to keep the next now what's that earing you already said and what else could it be but more so after the says what's the special for and what does mean what is more than than if something which might not be a might not be it might not be but if it's lacking Y and a person is he gets the special and says words that we couldn't say thousand times a special soft spot in his heart for someone that's that's it might not be but of St and then the raan says which we all have to hear because the T can't say everything T can't say how to park and not to hunk and make noise and not to be an aggressive driver and not to be a a mean landlord etc etc but the Torah gave a umbrella obligation status you know in other words it's not just important to be GL ker we have to be GL yha and for that there's a special also unfortunately the flip side by a lack of yashus a person goes from from from situs to he becomes so here we see the a little bit of the I guess introduction to the concept of not only when they but simply even now the big question of course is when does it apply after Kenyan was made it's POS you can't do that so in s the the concept of applies when the two the land and tenant or the buyer and the seller came to an oral agreement they decid okay it's going to be this amount per month Yas okay we'll write up a we'll write up a contract tomorrow in other words when they wrote up a contract if it was a legal Kenyon so that's a you can't reeg but in the inter once the agreement was made although legally and it's not binding there's nothing there was no kenion a word but this is a word as a word the explains why can't we say even before the actual agreement this should also be a a let's say he just threw out a price maybe give him a space because the protected both rights you're worrying about the tenant that's nice what about the landlord if he has to stay wait for this fellow to make up his mind otherwise it's a on a different tenant you're not protecting the rights of the someone will give a ridiculous price let me think about it okay you can't go to anybody else because I'm here first and there has to be protection of both rights and that's why I guess the RA in quotes this close this that when does begin if there was a real agreement on both sides or orbe it a agreement but that's when it begins however the preacher and seut Sim he quotes the I don't think he's arguing but he says now the meaning is that even though there wasn't a formal agreement official agreement but as he says it but when it looks looks good and if the third and if a new tenant doesn't intervene it will and it will work out then there's also an now you have to understand when a tenant sees the apartment so he likes it but he has to think about and has to work it out you know cuz he's living in this house and this child sleeps here and here how am I going to do it how many he wants to think it over at night just to see if it's going to work but the next day he'll grab it and this something that experience shows so the preer seems to say even if there wasn't a formal agreement but if you leave it take its course it will happen even that is a problem on on another tenant of on these on the words of this and also accept this as the in other words be patient give him a chance now of course let me tell you that the the second tenant is not losing if he doesn't get this apartment because don't forget part of oura not only B but bias PL so your your bias your your your apartment is B Shar even if there's a shortage the has no shortages trust me it's going to work out for your best so we definitely should we should try to follow this Min and give space when it's needed now aada very often they're playing around both are insisting I'm not budging the tenant says no I'm not paying a dollar more than this L I'm not giving you any less than this so if no one's masim so then you can come along and try to work things out even if one side is masim but that's not as it's like you know fellow who couldn't find the you know bar I'm doing great lately what happened at least I'm ask him to get married so half of 50% we have that's G right now sometimes also they came to pretty they're close to an agreement they're just playing around you have to know try to figure out you know they say once has asked about not be tenant but if if they say no you shouldn't push but he says yeah that's true if they say no then then leave it but if they say no but what they really mean is more money then you could push because they're not pushing they want you to push and give more money now some the landlord or tenant says no but they mean just you know let's work it out so basically we're going to say if it's close to a a agreement then leave it if they're both or one of them are saying absolutely not then you could assume that it's no and you could move in question if laa the there was a situation that they basically agreed whether it's actually verbally agreed or close to it and a second tenant came along and he either didn't know or didn't care and he didn't an aent and he he got a the landlord to agree to his proposal so first of all the landlord has to know who Ona because he he enabled the the tenant the tenant the second tenant to do an but it's more than that and by the way spells that out even though on the landlord if he didn't make a real agreement there's no is on him but him allowing the second tenant to the apartment that's he's enabling the second tenant to be on but more than that say again I saw this even if the even if the the second tenant got an agreement from the landlord he should give it up because you got this apartment through anuss now I don't know as but if someone's living in a house or an apartment that he got through on becoming a Russia that's not very conducive place to bring up a family have a family at sadik him in a place that he became a Russia doesn't seem to be the right thing so basically this is clear but thees is that let say he bought the item and you know he be the he started using it already so you say but I saw and this is points this out that a rental before he moved in is like yeah you got an agreement fine but give it back if he bought something he started using it so it's ready could keep it a rental even after you close with the with the with the landlord but you didn't move in yet so for you was drop it like like like a like a like stolen merchandise and let him go back to the first person interesting question the gar is talking is talking about a buying a real estate who said it's talking about a rental so the answer is first of all is it's all about being an is so what's the buying or rental more so I guess he soon see on this which is talking about buying discusses taking someone else's worker in other words you see someone has a good worker a good Mal a good manal a good head counselor we want discuss this but discusses taking someone else's work is also unless it's a very rare opportunity and that we discussed a different time but no doubt about it that's why you look in the tour and it says whether it's buying or rental does why so taking someone else's cleaning lady unless there's a special would be including the even though you didn't steal someone you're not a g of thees but if they have a worker T says unless there's a a because he could do a better job so you have to know if a if a clean lady is like that that know mine is one of a kind so we'll leave that to your discretion but no doubt about it it's La daa buying it's also rental and that's the what's interesting is let's say there's a on the floor let's say it's a there's a there's a wallet you to keep it and someone is about to take it but you you're quicker than him and you grabbed it first does the is of apply in that case well this gives us a little pause because till now we spoke about a rental or a purchase real estate or a rental maybe M maybe AA first come first serve however in we're back to Z where's the Asis he saw it first he's about to take it leave it more so if you look at rash inash Tes rash ising talking about and Co gain a purchase or a rental soash someone else's I mean someone else saw it first not his yet is the same however this is another says it can't be like Rashi because the if someone saw and someone else hopped it first the second one's allowed to take it so must be that it comes to and he says when it comes to a purchase or a rental so he has it first Yash let him take it go you'll find different apartment don't worry there's enough bias plainy of plany you can find it elsewhere but you can't look and find so saw line is explaining because in other words if you could get it elsewhere well you have to be so fine that's what about being making he has it first he saw it first leave it but if a question this or nothing then but that's the rash apparently held he saw it first let him have it how do we Pas we'll soon see many so brings both days both as which is very vague what does he hold if he says and then yes he goes with the first but here it's two seems to say is like the first which is that by there is no now he does certain Clauses regarding someone someone else which is a different sh but like the says it's to be like the rash that even by and we do say and I think suff Russ is also bad enough you know being a suff rush according to Rashi now you know I don't want to compare but Rashi many times fill in we try to keep both you know so maybe here we should also try to keep rash but now that we have the basic decided let's try to it more specifically someone needed an apartment he saw there was a advertisement apartment for rent and he's walking in and someone's walking out obviously other person saw the apartment so he saidd let me try my luck and he offered the land what do you want I'm going to give you $50 more per month he didn't ask questions but Lisa the first person was close to a contract so this is a simple case where it's a Russia and even though there was no formal Kenyon but as we said the go with this minut once he's about to take it don't take someone else's thing I the landlord took my offer and there was no commitment from the first one so the land was so this is basically even like we said give it back find a different apartment if it wasn't imminent it was just handling and they both left like you know not close then you could definitely do what you can then because you first it might be a good idea before you take such an apartment to ask landord where you holding you know you holding extra Clos to commitment and I'm not saying but definitely someone that's living y would do that but it's common when there are situations that this p no Apartments to be had there's a critical shortage of apartments and L with the neighbors are booming there's P very little apartments so here the L will say this apartment for me is a m because I you can't get anyone but this fit works for me perfectly the rent is good I you're Russia not really but we have at least and I have so we could argue who said you could extend that you know we called in our our terms it's a apartment is not a paying top dollar for it maybe is a not you know a bargain you know you say buy a bought a million dollar house I got a pretty interesting but maybe the whole is a literally not a bargain and indeed the raar says that when the raar that pasin like that that's literally a but when you're buying something there's no that is according to the obviously the whole has another problem even if you hold that includes rentals but according to Rashi there's no and sayashi so it's obviously far from pit but there's another and that ran that I mentioned earlier there andot that they made a plug you can't say you know this this is such they made and a case where you're buying or renting that is awesome it's really very hard to know what something consider you you could look you could wait you'll find an apartment and I saw both s and shin they both use the same who could really classify when it's when a rental or a purchase is a real M have patience you'll find another part you find another house so the says who knows when is it really a but at the end of the day the we do find that the if you could say thata this is a real real then you could be is has this says you could be but you have to be very very sure that it's really a don't forget to hold that is only ra versus Rashi and according to according to the sh we saw the ra do that so it's only a Bor if it's a b that you can't find elsewhere the end of and don't forget evening to don't to whatsoever best advice if you have such a sh ask a you know a person has a lot of Nas you know even aad and is is blinded by says if you have someone else had the apartment first you might think it's Mish crucial and critical no if a say this is a m situation yes shall question you want a certain apartment but you know it's under a lease But the lease expire is March 1st so you go over to the landlord you say you know what I know the lease expire is March 1st I want to take over Department you're not M to him because it's all over March 1st so this is wrong for two reasons first of all the person that's living there has a right to renew the lease now besides the fact that it's like they're holding close you know just like a stranger is holding close with the land you can't here he's living there for two years the only reason they made a lease is cu he wanted to raise the rent a little bit so it's he's close you have to wait till he gives his opinion maybe he wants to keep the apartment also this I saw says has another point the in one of the examples learn isra make a very long story short he selling a house there are two buyers one lives in Florida but he wants to buy an investment and one lives next door wants to take over the lot and build a bigger house goes first like a person living in the apartment he paid moving cost he renovated he made it to his liking so you're going to evict him and preempt him because you got there a day an hour first it's totally logical so no doubt about it that would be a perfect example of howya Yash from two different angles now if the landlord or tenant don't want to resume the you know continue the contract consider the following situation that's really quite challenging as it proceedes let's say the landlord and tenant are discussing about this apartment you know what I don't I I'm not interested I'm going to go elsewhere I'm going take a different tenant the L's all to do that right it's up to him it's his apartment right who's who is limited to one a second tenant versus the first tenant now if the landlord agreed to rent it to PL so for him to reneg on his contract terrible but there was no contract it was close so it's a fun situation a different tenant can't come along and offer more because that's because that's they're close but the landlord didn't give a commitment he didn't give a word he could go elsewhere and that's the certainly without Aon there's nothing to talk about that now a a new tener wants to come along and offer more money for the same apartment so then the land will say oh I like you better is that is that right in other words the land's allowed to take someone else can can the a second tenant make an offer and therefore the landlord will want him first so you look at the and cut B regarding Aila he seems to be make when they're offering more but it's a ple to accept this because first B says it's awesome and P say it's awesome because basically the landlord has a right to take any tenant he wants but you you as a second tenant can't preempt the first and by offering more but for you that would be but here's the so when I'm selling a house and I have two buyers one's about but the other fellow is offering more I could go the other fellow because I I I have to go for my interest you know he's into my interest so FR why when a second why can a second tenant that wants the apartment after there was agreement or close why can he offer more money and then he's allowed to take it you're making a big mistake if they were holding close or they already agreed then for him for the that's enough money you want to offer more money more money is not a he more money is if the landlord was willing to rent at this price so he's happy you're not the fact more money I think this a you know we didn't come down to this world to make more money we came down this world to make a living you know people say I have to work in because I have I can make more money I'm making per day but right if he's not doesn't go to learn he can make more money but there's a difference between making a living and making extra money and the mash with his very penetrating Insight understood once the was willing to rent it to to to First tenant for this price that means it's worth it for him the second tenant is offering more money that's already and that doesn't justify the second tenant coming along and grabbing what really belongs to the first one and this is the biggest site in in in this Su I want to make a point I never like to learn lessons from go but this was a very striking lesson that I learned when I saw my house it was almost 30 years ago T when Ken was come mostly go so wife gave me a dress go to this house I P was the first one that saw the house the guy put up M like yesterday who was very B and I just looked at it I had no idea what I'm looking but I'm looking at it you know my wife will come tomorrow okay I didn't say anything about you know anything I don't think I even heard the price I came the next day he says I could swear to you since yesterday three other people came to see the house and they offered $20,000 I one even offered more than that but by me this is Thomas panelli a real Italian by me a word is a word you came I didn't ask any questions I wouldn't hear anybody's offers I know he's not lying cuz people admitted to me that they offered more money they said you are lucky we offered so much money he wouldn't budge now I didn't make contract for sure I didn't know what I was looking at but it's something that you see that even without a without the the he doesn't know that but this is what year is supposed to to live his life with so the fact you can make more money is not a factor you have to make money you have to be a l to sell but more money so worth more than of course is the now obviously this is POS that if there are two people competing for an apartment so then there's no agreement at all and the landlord could go with the higher you know bid there's nothing to talk about when there are two biders or more that's very common and again something that you need a GLE to to work this out but it's a problem because in our neighborhoods I just heard some my mom is not far from my house a guy sold an old house and he asked for a certain price there were so many bides that the now the cost it went up $300,000 the only gain is the go us to sell this is common all over in the world unfortunately I do know of two that the way they worked it out is that there's a list of potential buyers you go either to the ra or the Russ call and you don't go directly to the seller and it's one at a time so the price doesn't go up now can this be worked out so you need a GLE or a businessman I'm none of the above but this has to be worked out because again just my around the corner of my house $300,000 ofish I can they down the drain I mean that's just the way it works but there's got to be a better solution but when we work with the ashis we know once we give a word a word has to be a word if the seller is still advertising then obviously he's not holding by closing with anybody so then either you could offer a better bid whatever it may be a very challenging question but it's an insight into the whole Su this I saw in the he I couldn't see it I don't know what it is I think I know what it is but I couldn't get it but this is the way he describes it there was a landlord that already agreed to take an a a tenant a with a lot of children somehow a engaged to be married saw the apartment they didn't know and they looked and said okay we'll pay the price and now the the landlord was in a dilemma you know take a big family you know it's very nice to have a kindergarten but not on top of your head you know making noise on top of head you're going to have a big family Ora they're not yet married two months to get married you know how it is every sh to go away it's almost a vacant apartment so it's but he already gave his word they already agreed there was an oral commitment with the tenant with a big family so again this this I think but this this this he said that it would be M to go with the second with the with the second tenant why so he says because the landlord you have to worry about his interest right now he has two different situations one is a dream situation and one is challenging that he says the the does not exist when the when the mask stands to lose and he said I told the this and he said it sounds MAV but you have to look in Chas what they say so I guess he was close enough to say what says if the can say differently then that must be and don't do it now I think I know what the was skeptical about becausei had the landlord heard about this before he gave a formal agreement then you can take what you want but once he agreed and wor yet the the another tenant was the one that reached out it wasn't the landlord reaching out it was another tenant so the tenant was in a violation of and the landlord may be whatever the point is but the landlord that accepted was so he this again quotes that this quot that says in a case where the where the reached to a different it's fine but again it's not a right that here the other tenant was the one that stepped in so he doesn't understand but besides everything he says what's the head for the land lord what about the fact that he's he promised to take the first family so even if it's much better so then he said we'll soon see there's a concept of will soon see what that means but it's hard understand because the landlord has the option didn't make a commitment but what's the if if the second tenant did something wrong now maybe they did something wrong probably they didn't know but that doesn't justify this situation another case I want to mention a little bit about the about if if the landlord made a precondition I'm showing it to you but if I get a better offer I might go elsewhere so that my already says that and there's no problem now typically a landlord is not limited but doesn't have usually but that's not true it could be very P let's say there's a tenant that's looking at a certain apartment and a landlord number two wants that he wants that dream tenant so once they saw the first one so you have the same in other words typically it's two tenants competing for an apartment but it could also be two landlords competing for a dream tenant now but basically in a regular situation the landlord as long as he didn't give a commitment he could go elsewhere he's not bound by in other words it's that the tenant is because they're close but to the landlord until there's an agreement there wouldn't be a problem Nowa this is important to mention another I saw let's say I'll give you a mus let's say there's a small City and there's nothing going on I mean the opposite of our cities there's barely a rental but one landlord has an apartment and it's sitting empty and he can't be so he invests big money and he advertised all over no so tomorrow he's been expecting a flood of tenants which he thought he has but there's another landlord a cheap skate that stands a few feet away from the this fellow's house and big sign apartment for rent apartment for rent whatever he does I'll give you $50 less a month now that's not situs that's for sure but is anything wrong they didn't go into the other person's apartment yet there's no not even near the other apartment what's wrong so this is terribly wrong this is not only is not this is could be enforceable by because this is the end of our that we began with that he that by it's m he then askha on himself how could I say in if a fisherman comes puts out his Nets and puts out bait you can't come along a second fisherman and and put your nets down why not presumably fish are he or or both and like meash is good but like me what about the he of in no C uncertain terms wait a minute if he invested money and that attracted the fish because he put down the right bait so you're going to make a living on his investment that's and used a very clear you are stealing his investment he spent money attracting these fish and you're stealing it I can't get think of a better mus than the mus that I made up this first landlord puts up signs and advertises and you come along Shen and grab his customers now a a contemporary Marshall that that could be and was a sheer for itself is a copyright a person makes up makes a saer and made a song Whatever It Is he made an an investment he made a a invent invention so I bought it from him so why can I make more copies now it's mine no no this is using someone else's investment of time money or both so really the copyright law and all its Expressions is based on this that even though it's not a physical song Story an invention but it's his remember when I was growing up there was a was a wonderful idea they they sold and bought G pictures if you remember so on the back of the pictures it was stamped that is I don't know what that meant but I know one thing you know to copy it why this thing this fell took a picture of a godle it's his creation Now I could buy it from him but I don't own it enough to copy it so that's the be remiss in not mentioning when someone invests it's worse than just an ethical issue of Russia or whatever now question both agreed both signed a a a lease even gave security now right before the tenant moves in he wants to go elsewhere he found a much better a deal the question is what's the so in a case like that the tenant is violating in a very serious way you you don't just drop a commitment maybe if there was a Kenyon that didn't work it's a which of course is frightening I don't have we shouldn't go further than that but let's say he deci okay I I I'll Brave those two which is of course insanity but let's say it does so the EM is I'm not sure I mean at least might not be K you have to again how it's structured so maybe it's not a but it's at least so here the question is is there any financial compensation a day before the March 1st what's he going to do with it so if the apartments go quickly and he could find an apartment before March 1st so you're stuck maybe with but at least there's no Financial to pay now I mean to me it's worse to be a Russia than having to pay but any it's not the point he's not asking that but the question is if let's say the month of of March it go sit vacant so you caused him to lose a month of rent that's a lot of money or maybe he say I caused him so it's a now half the story and I always say i' rather on the's Blacklist I don't need so you know people have to have the right priorities you know say is worse than but anyhow he says okay he's willing to Brave the he'll do this as well but it's not true because we find regarding canceling a worker a cater a hall whatever it is that you can't just cancel the last minute and say well you you didn't have a job tonight okay I'm sorry I caused you I'm sorry there's a to pay a worker if he can't find a different job because he you hired him the at Great length as a for itself explain why isn't it grma so either it's not gr and is I'm not going to get into the details or else if you make an agreement to takes worker Etc you can't just cancel and you have to pay well some say it's a she that you made and this of course was extremely Nea throughout our history people you can't you can't just cancel on a worker call up and cancel but to make a long story short this applies to rental as well that's what the Pim say IFA he can't find someone to take care of the apartment and he's going to be left Empty Apartment some compare rental apartments to others feel it's not a good comparison I can't go through the details but I could say definitely is a sad that he has to pay until the landlord finds a different Li tenant now there is another Factor here let's say there was a emergency the tenant have to go to father had a stroke he has to be there indefinitely and he can't take can't live in americael so by is there's those that a make just like Li during Co there were thousands of cancellations and no one had to pay cuz an O is G then a person cancels what could he do you know both are but is different what's interesting is let's say the the tenant the last day found an apartment at a v I'm talking about I mean like they say so this is what the what the discussed called trar he paid a regular price but here he has a someone gave him an offer much better conditions and a much better price so the M doesn't even mention that what do you mean so who cares you can't just re on a contract get him can't just not me me me there are more quotes two days in Simon rage D so it's it's a suff if there's a so to put it very simply if a person drops a contract to of of of a rental it's very very and he has to pay if he could prove it anness and TR and even those are not so POS basically my point is you know we can't go through this is a big sug but we have to understand understand that what has to be clear both tenants and landlords have rights you know it's just you know I asked oncea says who owns the apartment the landlord or the tenant so BNB said very good depends who you ask and he's right the landlord said I I put my life to this house I own it and tenant what I'm paying rent I'm out s case and the EMB the tenant has rights I want to tell you something let's say the landlord has a house and this is in this rental his investment his house burned down and now he's homeless so he tells the landlord matter of fact you know by the way you know I'm homeless but you're homeless now because you're out I got to move in so this within the release don't kick anybody out you got you're homeless that's it you know you can't kick him out because is K if the landlord wants to make Renovations and the tenants I don't want so you can't force him it's his house but then again it's the landlord's house now this this this is why there's so many problems because each see from their perspective but basically each has to protect the other person's rights and Bas when it comes to a sort of an issue we have to realize the the the is the best investment we can make there's a said Exquisite words just like there a in and we strive in is that's you know we feel SE if we fast and we fast an extra hour or two and how about if we give in and we're more M on a few dollars that's the in in I know the right word but no doubt about it this is clear that when someone you can't just cancel now the if the landlord wants to reneg on his contract and the Tenant NE is homeless and he has to take a furnished apartment it costs much more then some say that the land would have to pay the difference but it only going to work if there's an agreement there's a mutual understanding that each one has to respect the other one another mus we hear stories people late paying the rent it's an a besides says test see if that could be but you know this is his Panos we should we shouldn't be late in fact if a landlord wants to charge a late fee penalty and as long as it's it's done right that it's not ribus it's not per day but it's one time penalty so he's allowed to it's part of the contract in fact if he's if he's Del delinquent in his payment could be's allow to EV Vic him but the point is each of the of one has to think of the other one and I should mention has to be mentioned people tenants that are either or that could ruin the the ruin the ruin the neighborhood that's not just the that's but let me leave you on a more positive note with two beautiful as you know in Thea there's which means you go out and you try to find the question let's say I spot someone in the back and I would love to learn him but right now he's handling with someone else can I like motion to him call him over and offer him or whatever I'll offer him I want to take my does it apply and he basically says a person has to make sure he gets the best now he doesn't say it clearly but he means to say in you have to get the best for yourself but make sure the other person is satisfied now it seems he holds that we're applying in this situation now we spoke about this a few weeks ago says it comes to argues vly on this say so it's probable that was going with that applies to and that for yourself overrides or maybe we could say that this would like Rashi it's only if they made a agreement there's no agreement even though this the argues but we could be plus like you said maybe a like this is a and but last but not least and this B is a true story officially he was he was he was lining up to back into a spot he put on his blinkers and someone came along and the spot but how he the spot was an ultimate he sent his child to run into the area and block this person from backing into this spat so this tell me this the first in my life I had to get to run over a human being he says such a I mean I'm looking at but anyhow but the question is is was besides the terrible is so the EM is you might say oh this is a our is a but that's exaggerating it's it's Tak not easy but it's not a m and the only thing is what was he doing was he C to the ground is he did he buy rights no but that's he's backing up he puts the blinker on but the is we have to one minute one minute like to thank for the sh but the SE will be shortly wait one minute please V everybody knows that there's a war Isel but in the same time there's a war in Ukraine and thousands of walk up the heart they want to learn more go do put on one of the Front Runners of Mo to bring out to and cloud in Ukraine is my The Who over 30 years ago s vision and created over thousands ofish homes tens of thousands e theor they want to come out to learn they want to put on they want to eat Kos they want to keep shabas AOS kit millions of dollars needs to be every single day to help out and in a quiet way this Europe everybody's trying to do the best they can for today there's a matching fun going on charity they're raising today 1.5 matching whatever you give is a tremendous we need what biggest could he have by helping the you kids in this we ask to give bigger money whatever you can 100 a thousand whatever you can have protection we need for that you have yourid should have to come they through there's a table on the outside in the hallway please check or credit card KES [Music] for everyone could come and to he to seek what we learned today is that we have to learn obviously a word is a word if there's a k if there was agreement a written agreement but even a verbal agreement minimally is the was when there was a when there was a k that really wasn't entirely but even even we have to honor certainly to keep a word and that's the basis of even though there was no Kenyon there was no agreement but the fact that he was there first we have to give him each person has to get have their rights if he's interested let him it if not you could take it but it has to be either there was an agreement a verbal or be a verbal or according to the pr that's the that's the even close to it you have to let someone see if he wants to take it a one-sided agreement and certainly when both sides are not happy then you can move in and try to make it work but basically when there's an agreement even if it's not yet finalized that's if the the by by the landlord there is no but if he enables if he takes the offer of the second the second on and is there rental we did see regarding if by there is a shortage Apartments is not enough typically to make it a so even according to should be a problem a least expiring so then the one that's there has the right to renew if he doesn't want then you could take it the landlord could change his mind if there wasn't an agreement so there's no that case but once there was a a a a verbal agreement then the landlord is bound by the we had an interesting story where a saw after he greed to a big family and even though was an but it was an Ava and they should really not take it when the big family had it first I the Lord has a Tina that might be if it's enough of a difference that might be trari perhaps but this this is the question of but no longer are we woring about because it was done by a landlord has to be careful taking someone else's tenant a desirable tenant that's using someone else's investment of time or money is a Gaza that's a copyright law that's a a of taking someone else's work and using it a a tenant that wants to drop his lease it's possibly has to pay the landlord's loss it's more than a grma the question is when it's but there definitely and therefore ask first a real o or real traar that there are some that are make even that is not certain but both rights both have rights tenant and landlord have rights each has to protect the other one we Saida there's probably no parking spot there probably is but the is the the feeling of to you [Music] in how you doing