0:00 / 0:00
How Does the Talmud Fit into the Oral Law (Rabbi Shmuel Phillips) (Jewish Understanding)
479 views
Yeshivat Ohr Somayach located in the heart of Jerusalem, is an educational institution for young Jewish English-speaking men. We have a range of classes and programs designed for the intellectually curious and academically inclined - for those with no background in Jewish learning to those who are proficient in Gemara and other original source material. To find the perfect program for you, please visit our website https://ohr.edu/study_in_israel or call our placement specialist at 1-254-981-0133 today!
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
uh Rabbi Phillips and maybe Rabbi
Phillips you can just share a little bit
about your background before giving the
lecture thank
you thank you very much thank you very
much all for coming just but before I
start I want to thank Rabbi geen Rabbi
Shilla for helping to make this event
happen thank RBI brtz who gave me of
help and advice and endorsement for the
book He's you know he's very interested
in the topic of the of the oral
tradition how the gamorra came to be
what makes it binding all these sorts of
questions which people have when they
start studying gamar but they they don't
always get a a satisfactory answer to it
straight away um background I grew up I
was born in Sunderland in the north of
England in
1984 uh grew up in London I went to sort
of a range of different schools from
cedes to Modern Orthodox our way out
here to Israel in 2001 my first month
here was 911 which was an experience
I've seeing seeing the I remember my
first my first week in US Alliance
looking out on the balcony and seeing
the knesset being evacuated by by swarm
of military helicopters and something
might be going on
here and yeah I've say I've been
learning full or parttime in Yeshiva and
K since then um I was in mid at the time
I started doing a law degree from London
while I was in Yeshiva and that really
got my mind thinking because when you're
studying law from a secular perspective
it's very much how the system works
trying especially at the beginning
you're trying to understand what makes
what makes something law what makes
something legally binding how does the
law change who's authorized to change it
to interpret it and I was learning that
in the evenings while I was studying
gamorra most of the rest of the day and
kept thinking well how how would I
answer these questions in terms of
gamorra and Jewish law there must be a
system every legal Haka is is a legal
system it's a lot more than that as well
but it's it's a legal system so there
must be basic rules which govern how it
works and it really bothered me I I I
asked people I looked around and I until
I struck gold I came to the the rum
bom's hak dama to the missioner his
introduction to the missioner and he
there the r sets out how all these
things work and it was very comforting
for me to know that for someone like the
rumbum this was these are questions that
are so
fundamental that you have to clarify
them and understand them not just before
you start learning gamarra but even
before you start learning the
missner so if we start off with with a
couple of basic questions if if we say
to you all the oral tradition where is
the oral tradition from is it is it from
seni yes it's good it's not not a trick
question yeah one one of the the 13
principles of faith is that not just the
written text of the Torah comes to us
from mha but also the Torah shabal but
what exactly is the Torah shabal what
came from through via the tradition
through from mha and what was developed
through through the years for example if
I open up a gamorra here garus and I say
to you all was every word in
here given over to mosha and passed on
through the age You' say no it wouldn't
doesn't make sense I bu argues with
Rober about that and there are there
areas regarding situations which which
never even applied to Har night so the
idea seems to be that there were basic
rules and principles that were given
over to
Moshe which were then and then a system
through which Hala could be set up and
authorized through the generations how
do you know which is
what I found very few sources that I
could uh I could that would help me with
these questions another question let's
say we have a new Sun hedrin that sets
up tomorrow next week whatever it is
there's a discuss how it can come about
if think of Y the tried to set up a SED
in his day try to gather all the the
greatest in ER is at the time get them
to agree on who the greatest K were
instead of as hedin he came pretty close
I think there were there only a few or
maybe even one that that didn't agree to
it so let's say we get a new Sun hedrin
sitting political sitting wherever they
sit in the center of shal and we know
this the Sanhedrin have power to to
legislate to revisit to to tonas not
just when it comes to D ronon but also
when it comes to daa
dras um so so what would you say how
would you know how the Sanhedrin know
which Halas they can revisit and change
and renew and which Halas are off limits
presum they can't change
everything so again these these are
questions which I had which I I couldn't
really find a set of Factory answer to
so I'm going to start off reading a
little bit from this introduction of the
rambam to the mishner and we'll see
we'll see where we get up to so he
teaches that every
Mitzvah this is the I've got some
sources here if you want to read through
the sources with me or I can just go
through it myself and trans translate
the main
parts every Mitzvah that mosha taught in
the in the midbar in the desert he
didn't just teach the
the what was written in the text the
Torah the written Torah he taught it but
push he taught it with its basic
explanation with its accompanying
explanation and everything the ramom
teaches any part of this
explanation that was taught by mosha to
the people there could be no debate
about no one could say well I think they
should changed no Sanhedrin could
revisit
that this is the of the ram that
anything that was taught from mosha
we never forgotten and they can never be
disputed anything that was not heard
directly from from the Novi and this is
an important
term from the matters which branch off
so the sort of things that were not
heard from mosha were the finer details
of each of each mitzah so if we think of
it as a as a each Mitzvah has a basic
trunk it's like a trunk of a tree so the
basic feature of the M of the mitzah
let's say you have to sit on a Suka for
seven days so MOA would have to explain
the basic structure and function of a
Suka if because if you didn't teach that
no one would know what he's talking
about so we know basically what a Suka
is number of Walls basic sorts of
heights what what what the Sak is made
out of again basic ideas but the finer
matters exactly what the has to be made
out of how much of it has to be covered
under what conditions one's exempt from
sitting the Su these are all the finer
details those things they were left says
the rambam
undefined and a system of interpretation
a system of legislation was given over
to theim to legislate to each generation
by the Sanhedrin it was the Sanhedrin
that had actual binding uh binding power
to make law but the would they would
create d
with logic this is the logic of the
G the 13
um art scroll call them the
hermeneutical the hermeneutical
principles that's what this terms
everyone knows from the art scroll the
hermeneutical devices um K gazer shaba
all the different ways we look at the
text of the Torah and this system was
given over to mosha and he taught the
people how to use
it so these are these details these
finer details were not taught directly
to mosha he was just given a system
through which these details couldn't
could be created and in these finer
details sh which were created by the
sages and the courts of the generations
there are certain things which there was
no M about all there are certain other
things which were disputed because when
there's no you like in the gamorra you
can't there's no uh answer book at the
back you can look up and see who's right
so one will look at it one way and uh
and say well a new situation has come up
or a new detail is being discussed well
I will compare it to a which is M and
another will compare it to which is and
they'll bring arguments one way or the
other one will D the posk one way one d
d the posk the other way and there's no
definitively right answer that stage
that's how you get Al Alo that both are
both are correct because neither this
Hal was not given over by by mosha mosha
Gave Over the system so Within These
finer
details that is where the M started and
the and this is the area within which
the Sanhedrin of each generation has
power to legislate and to revisit what
was legislated by an earlier
court and the question comes up this is
something I don't know if uh any of you
in RT's question and answer session I
listen to it quite often I've been over
the last few months I've been doing some
volunteering work one day a week on the
farms and I've my my podcast my shirim
which I which I catch up with and one of
them is the r his question and answer
session and I know this question has
come up a couple of times well why did
Hashem create a system like this we know
M raenu was had had a better form of no
more accurate precise level of Prophecy
than any other prophets that will come
later and certainly a better way of
understanding hashem's R and his will
than any the would come after the N so
why did Hashem set up a system which is
incomplete
give over a toy which just had the main
principles and give over the details to
be legislated by the courts why not
Hashem could have given over a system
where every single detail of Al was
fixed at the
time and then we be practicing is
pristine form of where we'd know
everything is right so I don't know if I
don't if you've heard his Mall go on
because according to every generation
there is a required set of Halas like
they did according to the requirement
for each generation very good that's one
of that's one of the answers that's very
so before I get to that I'll I'll say
Bri his Marshall because to me it really
beautiful Marshall um I don't if you've
heard it already you can stop me in the
middle and I'll go I'll go a bit quicker
he he talked about
how he gave he gave a marshall an
example of of a father who has to run a
birthday party for his daughter he's got
a six seveny old daughter and what does
he do so option A was we saying Isel a
your Bel God there's no there's no
birthday without a cake he's got to get
a cake so he can go out to the bakery
and he can find her favorite uh book or
cartoon character find a cake which is
perfectly uh created and sculptured with
the icing looks beautiful she'll be
delighted option one very nice but
there's something better he can do what
is that he can sit down with her at home
find out what sort of cake she wants go
to the shop with her get the ingredients
spend a couple of hours baking the cake
together and it's not as beautiful and
pristine as the one they bought in the
bakery but what have they gained a
relationship they've spent hours
together building a relationship between
them and that said Robert brtz was part
of the or is part of the function of the
tab Bal it's not just we given this set
go and keep that it's Hashem wants us to
be toiling in the T to be using our to
using our mind to be understanding the
spora the logic of the gamar why is this
way maybe it should be that way why am I
comparing it this way maybe I compare it
that way and the process of learning and
and and the intellectual efforts we're
putting in is part of a process of
building a relationship with Hashem we
we build a an intellectual and also
event a spiritual relationship with
Hashem by studying the tal and that's a
primary part of its function so that's
one reason why yes Hashem could have
given us this perfect pristine set of
Torah but that would have defeated part
of the purpose of it
that's part one part two as uh what's
your name AEL as azreel mentioned is
that's part of the function of the tabal
this is something which we've almost
lost touch with a little bit because we
haven't had a Sanhedrin type court for
so many years and also we've had the
conservative and the reform movements
who who sort of go overboard and trying
to change Hala and and without correct
boundaries without correct court or
anything like that so we've very much
pulled back from this idea that that
changes we we've sort of kept the
the because we haven't had a Sanhedrin
but in an ideal State when the t is
functioning as it should be we have a
Sanhedrin there as you said which
recognizes the needs of the generation
and knows the limits and knows the
system that was transmitted through the
generations from mosu and within that
system can um create the details of ala
to meet the needs of the generation and
I'm going to quote here from the M
ofin he was
writing sorry he was writing in Germany
in the
1920s and he's talking this is this is
his commentary
on it's his commentary on the to they
rebuke all of the the terrible things
that were going to come across the
Jewish people if they didn't keep the
Torah and he and one of them is Gus
going into Exile which we had for for
much my history and what really comes
out of it is that we think of goas think
of Exile and we associate it with two
things we're out of our lands that's a
terrible thing we we have we have the
pogroms we have the persecution we're
all very familiar with that but there's
another aspect of Gus which we don't
we're not even so familiar with and that
is loss of control over the
Torah and he's talking about how in this
section how the Youth of the day which
is I the the youth in the 19 1920s
Germany
are feeling disenchanted and
disconnected from the Torah and he says
were were we back in Israel in the good
old
days had we been back as the system was
supposed to be in with
aedin and even when it comes even with
ders ofus so the M says we in gas are
unable we we we're fixed we we're
Paralyzed by theic system which has come
to us because we don't have a son hedin
and that is part of the punishment of
gas were we back in Eric St with a
Sanhedrin as it was supposed to be we
would be able to as you said legislate
and be matain and create dras according
to the needs of the generation there's a
there's a saer which says the same thing
from a cabalistic perspective it's
called the deel he's one of the
earlier he talks near the beginning of
his Parish on Torah he says he talks
about how every generation has its own
Shish of the okay don't ask me exactly
what these these things mean um but it
say every the nshama the overall nsh of
each generation the spiritual mystical
needs of each generation is a little bit
different and part of the function of a
Sanhedrin is to be tuned in to recognize
the spiritual needs of the nas of that
generation and to create tonas and Jas
in order to maximize the or to meet the
needs of that generation so that's a
fascinating idea there's one other
source I bring also it's called which is
is a brilliant saer of of general rules
of how the G how the
ra basically gives you a basic structure
of how to learn them of the different
rules that apply to them and he says
Under The Heading of Jas that one of the
function of draas of the hermeneutic or
the the the ways of of of uh mining laws
out of the Torah
is the
newas were renewed and created according
to the needs of the time throughout the
generations
for and recognizing what the generations
needed they would then create a DHA
which suited that and the big question
always is well how much you when we're
reading in the mission OFA said this
based on based on one DHA rubish shim
said that based on another DHA so how
much is based on them looking at the the
uh words of the Torah the the the the
system that's come the the G Shas The
the rules that have come down and how
much is based on the needs of the
generation and as we don't have a
precise answer because many of the
mishas we have don't don't give us the a
full account of the of the the motive of
the of the tan but there's one source
which we which we do have which is very
interesting which according to of the
the r that do deal do deal with this and
that is it's the last mishner in the
first chapter of
cus and the case that's being discussed
is uh it's it's a discussion about how
when a when a woman gives birth or has a
miscarriage before she's able to enter
the Bas of mikdash or eat from carbonous
she has to bring a certain carbon I it's
two col it's two pigeons one katas and
one
Ola and inevitably what happened the
Jewish people at definitely time at the
end of the second mdos they weren't all
living close to the base of mdos some
were out in bval some were further
further away and not everyone came each
each year even to the B mikd forel
there'll be people that come every 3
years you know people in America now
they they'll come here every few years
they'll come and uh and and visit for
yam and so they had these cases of these
families that came in from Bell they
hadn't uh been in your for 5 six seven
years and in the intervening years the
the uh the mother of the family had had
either several children several
miscarriages and she wanted to go to eat
the carbon of the yam enter the base of
mcdash and the question came up well
does she have to bring just one set of
carbon us for all of the obligations in
the intervening
period or does each separate birth
require a separate carbon and this was
this was something which was disputed
among the tan
think reia said that one set of caronus
suffices for everything because it's
really a purification process and just
like going into the MVA it doesn't
matter how many times you've come into
contact with something impure you go
into the Mikvah once and it purifies you
other
tanri said no it's more kin to carbonous
and each time you you each time you have
an obligation to Pro carbon you do a sin
you have to bring an additional carbon
so they argued about it the Sanhedrin
sat and the Sanhedrin ruled stringently
according to Y and
benri so suddenly all these women had to
bring multiple Coronas and each one I
think was at Le was a couple of birds so
what happened at the
timear okay say better what happens with
suddenly a surge in demand for for for
carbonos the prices went way up all the
traders of
caronus it was a big time for the uh for
the animal Traders bring animal along to
the base of mdos bring your hers along
the for the when the crowns are coming
in to bringus and you can make a killing
right so suddenly that the sanedrin has
ruled just before yam that all these
women have to bring many more carbas and
they will put their prices right up so
Shel who is the head of the sunedra at
the time he came out to harab it he saw
what was going on and he took a sh this
is all recorded in the mishna and he
said I'm going to take a that we're
going to deal with this we can't we
can't have all these women that been
and they're being exploited by the uh by
the Traders and they he reconvened
Sanhedrin on the spot and they voted in
accordance with riaa's more lenient
version that one set of corbond would
suffice for everything and it said the
price dropped by quarter by to a quarter
by three quarters so what we have here
is to to me I mean I think Russy said it
was Hara it was a oneoff it was a
one-off decree but most Rim this was a
was a full decree of the sedr and the
now follows this that one set of konus
is is required for everything but what
we see here is the interaction between
these two different systems both sides
of the arguments saying that she should
have to bring multiple gon or only one
carbon they were both reached through
application of regular dras you had Tan
on both sides you had on one
side on the other side and they are both
using the system of jha's the system of
the oral law which has come down from
mosha and reaching conclusions on that
basis yeah we also see the input of the
needs of the generation the head of the
Sanhedrin going out and seeing what's
happening and saying you know what we
have to revisit and we have to rule a
different way so that's just there's one
example we have of the interaction
between these two different uh these two
different parts so of these two
right so now the next question comes up
well how do we how do we know we've said
we have this two tier system within Hal
within the oral tradition parts of the
oral tradition which are fixed they've
come through from MOA they they are the
core Parts which Define the the basic
function of the MIT the Mitzvah they can
never be Aus over them can be disputed
they can never be changed no Sedin can
never change any of this and then
there's this second section of which we
he called the in the finer branches the
finer details which were handed over
they were delegated almost left open to
the of each generation to legislate via
the courts and those
things were deliberately left open to be
defined to according to the needs of the
generation to to build this connection
um I've brought more sources on the
sheet h m the beginning of chapter two
of the rambam he he he he talks out in
explicitly how if a Bas if Sanhedrin
sits down and Das creates a new Hal via
one of the midow
a new and the Next
Generation come along
and they understand something
differently this second Court can I
think even
must change the according to what they
see in their eyes so we see this is very
very important it's absolutely crucial
to know which Halas fit which
category um
there's an example here is a missus that
I bring there's AA which came up about
Amon Moi there's certain certain Nations
this isn't isn't really applicable
anymore we don't know exactly which
generation is which about am but there's
they could not the males of am could not
marry into the Jewish people even once
they converted and there was Aus in the
among the tan about whether this applied
also to the females Amon
presents in order to say it should be
this this prohibition should not apply
to the women and they say back to him he
he presents to them this
is they say back to
him if what you're
presenting is a law which has been
transmitted through the generations from
mosha nikel we accept it we we're not to
challenge which has come all the way
through from mosha we can't that's
beyond our power we know
that but if this you're telling us is
your own creation it's your own logical
conclusion from a you've looked at the
sources and said this is what seems
right to me if that's the
case we don't find your so Bing we have
a we can override it and therefore we're
not going to accept what you
say he says no what I'm telling you is a
tradition that's come through the
generations and if you look at the books
that was the accepted and that is now
the it came to us today so it's
absolutely crucial for us to know and to
determine which Halas we have especially
if we're looking to set up us inh again
one day but even in terms of learning
the gamor and I'll show you in a minute
why awareness of these two different
categories when you're learning gamorra
opens up so much it helps you understand
so much of what's going on in the
gamarra any questions before we start I
I'll give a example
of the MIT but any questions before
that okay so sh is a pretty popular one
we do it a couple of times a day and as
far as we all know sh
is we keep it it's written we have
written in the
T we have to say these words we have to
teach
these we do them in the evening when we
when we lie down and again in the
morning when we rise
up as far as we all know and this is as
we have
it however when we learn through the Su
the part of the gor which deals with
these things suddenly it doesn't seem so
clear Source here from bras
21A of
taught so you're getting in late at
night You' been to a wedding you're
lying down in bed and suddenly did I say
Krish or not did I Mar I I can't
remember such a busy day we're dancing
we're eating I I cannot remember if I if
i' say or
not you do not you are not obligated on
on the basis of this doubt to go and
read again the continuation says my
timer one is the reason
Kish teachers of yud the M of kishma is
Rabin and as we know when you have a
sopic when you have a matter of doubt in
Rabin law we are lenient we go Lula as
opposed to d sopic d we have a matter of
doubt in Torah law we're stringent so
Ruda seems to be teaching that sh is
rabic how can that be we know it's it's
written in the Torah and that's what the
gar
challenges
M says well how can you say the MIT
we have it there in the PK you got to
say these words when you lie down the
kishma of the night over and the of the
morning answered on behalf of
no
that is only referring to reciting words
of Torah in
general so that would seem to be
Torah law and it seems to be according
TOA and according to
others the the specific words of the
passage that was that we end up reciting
is only rinic well how do we unpack all
this how do we put all this together
based on all the principles that we've
that we've uh learned together so
far we have that introduction of the
rambam to the mishna and he's taught us
that anything which came to us miss from
mosha from SII
there could be no makus over there could
be no dispute so if we are now going to
apply this principle of the rambam to
this passage of gamar about
Kisha we're forced to say that the
Mitzvah Kama at least saying over the
passages of Shar that we have in our
sedor that did not come from
Moshe that was seem to be the conclusion
that we get however it's not so simple
because what we do find what what is
Undisputed did is there is some form of
Mitzvah to recite words of
Torah that everyone agrees all everyone
in the gar agrees there some kind of
Mitzvah but not everyone agrees on the
content of the mitzah the details to
recite
specifically so now if we if we look at
together we look now the different
layers of this par this and
the let's see if we can build something
up so we've got that the basic the basic
meaning of the words the Torah so say
taught
them all these words in terms of its
basic meaning the basic shut level
they're just telling you you should be
involved in words of Torah the whole
time as often as you can whether you're
walking in the street whe you're sitting
in your house morning evening anytime
you have spare you have a spare moment
don't of sit there scrolling on your
phones but open open a mishna do
something useful with your time create a
connection to Hashem in that moment
that's the general meaning in terms ofat
however what is Undisputed what we see
from the gamorra is absolutely
Undisputed is that there's also some
kind of Mitzvah say
of it's not and specifically those two
words not when you're walking in the
street and sitting your house there's no
MIT to go around walking in the street
every day reciting Torah there's a
spefic Mitzvah in the evening and in the
morning to recite words of
and that's
Undisputed so if that is Undisputed and
it's a central feature of a Mitzvah we
would applying the principle of the
ramban would say that is something which
has come to us through the M through the
tradition from mosha so what we can be
pretty sure about is that there was
definitely a Min of to recite some words
of T every morning and every evening the
idea presumably is to bookend your day
in Torah that even if you have a day
which is very busy you have to run
around and do other things if everything
you do is in bookended in the context of
Torah that has some kind of influence
over your day we have similar ideas in
terms of the the Bas of mdos certain
things which are done in the morning in
the evening bookends the day gives a
certain meaning certain
significance what about K the way we
have the Mitzvah today so I would this
is the way I understood it was that at
some stage th HED would have looked
around and said well what are the needs
of the general generation we think that
there's a certain weakness in terms
of accepting the Yoke of Heaven the
unity of God and therefore we are now
going to fix what was previously a an
open mitzah to recite any passages of
Torah morning and
evening we're now going to fix this as
specifically the passage of K Shar and
we can they can do that because as we
know as we've seen the Sanhedrin a fully
formed Sanhedrin an authorized Sanhedrin
have the power and authority to
legislate even within Torah law and the
question the gar is do they legislate
that as Torah law or Rabin Law Without
get to the significance when I first
learned this sugu and I had these
conclusions I thought it was a bit
radical I wasn't so sure about it and
then I looked at some of the
commentaries and have a look here the P
Yeshua shakas is a similar thing and he
says on this on this
of he
says what what is the meaning what is
the intention of this so he's also
troubled by this IDE of krishma being
rabic he
quotesa which I couldn't find inside but
take it from the panua that the one that
says this is because it it's it's
understood by
him that that the says you recite these
words in the morning in the
evening it's not there's a requirements
to recite specifically this
of morning and evening on terms of the
basic meaning of the
Torah even if you were to recite a
different passage of the Torah morning
and evening that would be
enough
however how the stages came along or
whatever stage it was I'll explain to
you why I think there sometime during
the B sheny um they came along and they
made a ruling at certain stage that no
we are using our power and authority as
a Sanhedrin to say no it's not open
anymore we want you to read specifically
The Punisher of
why because the felt that we need to
reinforce we look at the need generation
as you said and we need to
reinforce the accepting the the Yoke of
Heaven once the have done that we are
now no longer able to F the Mitzvah in
any other way we have to
read if we read other P of the Torah we
haven't fulfilled the Mitzvah and that
is the power of aedin the power of a c
now why do I say this was probably done
during sometime during B
Shen because there's an interesting
phenomenon we have with K Shar when we
we have kma we we recite every day we
don't just say Shama what do we say
along with
it after before and after we have BR
over
um and what the we say just before
normally normally the you have over a
Mitzvah relates to the actual Mitzvah
that you're doing however what do we say
when we there's
no what is it all
about which is paraphrasing the words
the
we should be speaking in your
statutes we should be rejoicing in your
word of Torah this BR over is all about
t
Tor the bras of as far as we know were
formulated by the unshaken zakola the
men of the great assembly this go right
back to the start of B sheni maybe even
earlier but definitely the start of B
sheni so it would seem that at that time
when the UN were were formulating the
broas
of the the wasn't it wasn't a Mitzvah
was a Mitzvah
of and at some point the Sanhedrin sat
down and they limited the Mitzvah
to and the paragraphs with it but they
did not want to change the the uh
formula of the maybe they weren't
actually able to change it's a separate
discussion the form of the bras which
whicha put together and that's why we
have this we call it a dissonance but
it's it's this little bit of a
disconnect what used to be a broad mixst
of T Torah into cre sh and to extend
that the the MIT the
over there's a discussion in I think in
certain circumstances if you don't say
your in the morning but you do say the
BR of over Torah you already fulfilled
your br T and you don't go back and
recite the Brad of T again check whether
P exactly when it applies and doesn't
apply because it's a bit of a
complicated Su but there is that concept
that this BR over shma represents a br
of T there's one other
source connecting the mitzah of kishma
to the
basic minimal um obligation of T Tor
this a gamar I bring over the
page so this is taught in the name of
even if a person did
not recite any Torah in a day except for
the sh of the morning and
evening he has fulfilled the the the
obligation of not having Torah absent
from his mouth the very minimal daily
obligation of of tat Tor is represented
by the mid
of bookending your day in Torah and to
me this is this is an idea of how being
aware of how the system of TOA Bal works
these two different categories things
which are fixed which can never change
which are Undisputed and come through
the generations from M raenu and the
finer details which were given over to
the and to the Sanhedrin to
legislate they are very important to
know in terms of studying and
understanding gamor see how everything
fits together and they will also be when
we have a bid and sanin and everything
very soon the saned the first thing San
will need to be to be able to determine
is which parts of Hal they are they have
the authority to change for example K
according to what we've
seen the San will be able to sit and say
well our generation we're fine
on we're fine except in the oak of
heaven but we need to strengthen a
different area of has therefore they
could change or they could add other
parts of the Torah to the m OFA but
never be able to come along and say um
we're going to change the Mitzvah to be
three times a day or once a day or not
at all because the basic structure
of being a Mitzvah to recite Torah
morning and evening that is something
which we know has definitely come
through from mosha and that's something
which no one could ever change as part
of the oral tradition which is off
limits even to a fully authorized
Sanhedrin so yeah that's just an example
from the first section of my book of how
awareness of the basic underlying
principles of gar and toal can really
open up and and uh change the way you
learn
gamar thank