0:00 / 0:00
Fringe benifits | Rabbi Shmuel Gordin | June 2 2026
5 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
I really made a uh a difficult decision
for me
and that is I'm turn I turned away from
the major subject of paras.
major subject is
the sin of the spies and it it's very
significant because it's the turning
point for that generation and
understanding it is very important but
I've spoken about it so much that I
don't know how many of you have heard
what I had to say about it so I decided
to do something different and that is
we're going to turn to the end of the
para and we're going to look at the
mitzvah which emerges at the end of
parasukas
for the women among us. You'll see
you'll even though it's not a mitzvah
for you, nonetheless, it's a mitzvah
worthy of understanding and you'll see
that it might be for you as well. All
right. So, if everyone take a look at
the first paragraph on page number one,
>> what
>> the name of the
>> Oh, it's okay.
>> Thank you.
>> Sorry.
Okay,
speak to the people of Israel and they
will make for them themselves sit
etc etc. What is the first question that
comes to your mind?
What are tits?
Right? What [laughter]
it's not explained is it what what where
did this come from? What does the term
mean? where what's
so if you take a look that's the fir and
then there's a second source which is
gelium tel that's a little better
understood gdili means fringes al arba
kanfos so the four corners of your
garment and but the primary source the
one that we looked at on top really
doesn't define the word at all so we
find that rashi immediately respond
and says
it's for he actually gives two two
explanations
alit
shame
he quotes and he shows that
is used as a term for something which
hangs down like long hair and therefore
or
the tit is something that hangs down and
that's what the word means. Secondly, he
says there's another explanation for it
and that is
taking looking out
looking out from the window looking out
and seeing and what basically
means
he says is to look
now what's in yes I'm sorry. Could it be
related to the sits of the co?
>> Ah, very good. Very good. Could it be
related to the tits of the cohenado? A
good chance. But but it's not the same.
Clearly not the same. All right. Now
the Rashbam
who is Rashi's grandson takes Rashi's
two interpretations. He Rashi gives two
separate explanations. One which is
hanging down and one. So the rashbam
takes those two together
and he says
and he's explaining he therefore says
the term means two things at once. It
means things that hang down, strings
that hang down and it also means
something that you're supposed to look
at. and that he gathers from the
statement uh from a statement elsewhere
in the text. But the fact being that
this is as Rashi said
emerging from the concept of lahatitz to
see to spy etc. It explains by the way
the rash bomb's interpretation rashi's
interpretation as well but in a
different way explain a very difficult
pok in that first paragraph. Go back for
a moment
speak to the children of Israel and say
to them they should create on the big
etc. Well
next
what does that mean? You've just defined
it and you told me to do it and now
you're saying they will make sit which
will be for you. What what does that
mean?
So it's the second explanation that
Rashi brings and the Rashbam holds the
two. It's you're supposed to look at it.
It should be something to which you turn
and look. And therefore the first
explanation offered by Rashi is really
an explanation of the object. The second
explanation is that inherent in the
object is a required action and that
action is
which fits right into the text of the of
the word of the uh of the Torah. Okay.
So we define we've defined the term.
Yes.
We'll get to that. We'll get to that.
Okay, good. We'll get to we we're going
to cover a a number of things today
hopefully. All right. Next, defining the
mitzvah technically.
All right. Now, there's a very different
interesting situation
there. Turn to the at the bottom of page
two.
First thing he says,
if you have don't happen to have or wear
a four cornered garment, you're not
there's no mitzvah of meaning you don't
have to do this. This is this is only
originally this is only if you happen to
have a four cornered garment. But then
he goes on and this reflects the
thoughts of over the years.
But it's good and proper that every man
should have a talan. So even though you
don't aren't obligated to do this, you
don't have to wear that garment.
Nonetheless, it's an opportunity to
perform a mitzvah which you should not
let go. And we, as you suggested to me,
this ties in to what we said last time
about seeing mitzvot as opportunities
rather than as burdens or
responsibilities. Yes.
>> You're not wearing them. Is that a
problem?
>> We'll get to that, too. All right.
All right. All right. Let's Let's hold.
Okay. One more question and I'll
>> remember
how is a woman supposed to remember the
mitzvot. Okay, we'll get to that too.
[laughter]
All right, let's let's take it step by
step. All right, but what is clear is
that some for some reason and in some
way for the one who wears it it's going
to represent somehow all the mitzvot and
we'll get to that. Now what's
interesting also is here here's a
mitzvah that almost every
adult male performs and in fact it
becomes aside from the ama really the
kipah becomes the the uniform of the of
the Jewish male and yet emerges
originally as a v voluntary mitzvah not
as something you have to do something
you should do and that's what we do.
Don't tell your kids that that it's not
obligated. Next.
All right. Next. Turn to the next page.
>> I can't hear you. What?
>> Oh. Oh. Oh. Very, very good. Very good.
All right. I'll I'll repeat what she
said. There is a phenomenon that has
hurt happened here in Eratis Israel
which is an amazing phenomenon and that
is since October 7th
numerous numerous kayal have started
wearing CT people guys who were not
observant but feel the need to find some
sort of uniform that ties them in not
only to the IDF but ties them into to
Yadus. Uh, I'm I'm amazed at this
religious awakening that's happening
around us. I'm even more amazed, but
that's a whole different subject, at the
religious stature of the hostages and
what and how they became more from
actually during a time that really
should have been a time where you're
asking as rather than accepting. But
it's beautiful. Next.
Now it said
you're supposed to put it on a four
cornered garment.
What if you have a five corner garment?
All right. If you have a three cornered
garment,
that's clear, right? There's no
obligation to put it on a three- corner
garment. If you look at the Tomi says,
Okay. Four and not three. So therefore,
if you got a three corner garment, there
is absolutely no responsibility.
What about a five corner garment?
amore. The extra phrase that says the
garment that you are covering yourself
with which speaks of a large garment
indicates that starting with four and
moving upwards.
I sh meant to shut it off. Sorry. Okay.
Starting starting at four and moving
upwards, you are responsible to put
something on the garment. Now what do
you do? Do you put five fringes? The
answer is no. You put four fringes se
separately but leave that one last
corner without next.
And that's what the Mishna Torah, the
Rambam says.
You basically should take the four
corners that are the farthest from each
other so that it's evident that that's
what you're doing and you put it next.
Next question is something that really
ties into aic
principle that carries throughout
and that is the definition of an
obligation. Is it a kovatra
or a kovat?
Meaning what? Is the obligation that
we're dealing with a responsibility on
the person or is it is a responsibility
that centers around the object. Now,
what would be the difference? Exactly
what you ask. Take a look at the bottom
of the page and you'll see that at least
one point of view says the following.
of
clay.
If your four corner garment is sitting
in a in a drawer according to this
position, it has to have you don't have
to wear it to be responsible. That's the
difference between and gavra. In other
words, if it's a if it's an obligation
on the object, then no matter where the
object is and no matter what it's doing,
I have to put sites on it. If on the
other hand, it's a kovat gavra, then I
only would be responsible when I put
them on. And basically there's a debate
clearly this is one position. The major
debate according from to Tashkanazic
tradition is decided that it's avat
and that you don't have to put seats if
it's in the sitting in a container
somewhere. Next,
okay, we're getting now
the issue of when when are you
responsible to wear CC? If you're going
to wear tiss when is it a mitzvah?
I have a memory a personal memory of
sitting next to my grandfather
um one of my grandfathers my mother's
father in in Schul and in Mariv and I
never I was very young I don't remember
how old I was and I never never dive in
Mariv and when we got to the schmai took
out my titi then he says no no he he was
upset that people would see that I was
doing the wrong thing. So it how do we
know that it's only a daytime mitzvah?
It comes from what?
>> Exactly. You shall see it. You shall see
it gives you the indication that it's
only now. But here's the interesting.
>> What? I'm sorry. What?
>> Uh
I'll take here. Here you go. Here you
go. Here's here's the here's where it
gets complicated.
What's the hala?
What's the hala? If I wear
daytime diet garments during the day, so
daytime garments during the day are
kayavonsis.
What if I wear daytime garments at
night?
What if I wear nighttime garments during
the day? Right? In other words, is it a
it'ssaver issue? We said it's a gather
issue. We said it's on the person, but
nonetheless, is there an is there an
intimation as you say from that? It's
the definition of the thing itself. And
therefore, I I it depends on what the
garment actually is and what it's used
for. If it's used for daytime, then it
requires seat. If it's not used for
daytime, it's nighttime, maybe it
doesn't. And you could wear it during
the day without seat. So the answer is
we become mockpit at both ends.
If you wear daytime garments at night,
you should wear it without a braha. If
you wear nighttime garments during the
day, you should wear it nonetheless
without a braha. If you wear daytime
during daytime, that's when you say a
brah. But nonetheless, that covers what
you're saying, which is thato seems to
indicate that it's not just a classical
kovasgra issue, but there's an element
of there's an element of the definition
of the clothing that determines now this
gavra thing issue is something as I said
that courses throughout Jewish
tradition. For example, is fillin a
kitzah or a gaver issue? Is it
what's the mitzvah? Is the mitzvah just
a half fill in or does the mitzvah when
I put them on? So clearly that's a kovat
gavra, right? But on the other hand,
what are there are other things which
are clearly not responsibilities on the
person but rather a responsibility that
the object either should exist or should
be taken care of and those become
is it
or
all right so that's this is a negative
usually the argument is on a positive
commandment but Here here the question
is am is it that I am required to or is
it that the [clears throat] the the
getting rid of is itself the object is
is what goes on and it's a kovatra
really it's it's you are responsible you
have a responsible to stay away from
and not have it in your but that's but
that as I said courses through I
told you the last time I think that I
was in his shear for three years. Um,
two years actually. Uh, he often often
in the Gomorrah would stop and say, "Is
this a kovas or a kovas?"
What he would say, you have to define
it. You have to know whether it's a
mitzvah incumbent on the object or a
mitzvah incumbent upon you. What pra
there's no there's no real na
necessarily. There's no real difference.
It's still obligated. You still have to
do it. But the extent of the obligation
would be different like putting titsus
in a drawer. So you see if you hold that
it's only
then you don't have to put sitsus in a
right. So that it has its it has its
application
the [snorts]
the next who. All right. Who's who? Men,
women, children, who has who has a
mitzvah of tits?
So what's the rule?
>> Mitzvah,
positive commandments, not negative,
positive commandments that are ruled by
time,
women are exempt from that category of
commandments. No, women are not required
to observe them. Is this a mitzvah drama
or not?
What do you say? What what is the answer
is? Yes. What what is the day? Right? In
other words, it's dependent upon
daytime. Whether it's daytime clothing
or daytime observance, it's dependent on
that. But I'll show you something very
interesting. Take a look at the bottom
of page four at the
All right. Women and servants. It's not
slaves. It's servants are pot
right
that is the statement of Rav Cairo.
But if you look at the you know that the
nose of Cairo has the bold print and
Ravosha Isurus has the small print. What
happened? It's very interesting what
happened. Verboshulis was a a a
well-known RV, a renowned rabbi in the
Ashkanazi community and he decided that
he wanted to write a compendium of
Jewish law that he wanted to write a
shanar basically and you know we we have
to understand that these are
revolutionary documents because
originally oral law was supposed to be
oral and and we've moved by by the
Rambam to taking them step by step as
written law But
he heard
that Revse Cairo was writing the
Shanarak
which means the set table.
He said
I don't have to duplicate. It's not
necessary for me to write a compendium
if the great Rivios of Cairo was
writing. So what am I going to do? I'm
going to write a comment, not a
commentary. I'm going to write on every
one of these alakot where it's
appropriate what the Ashkanazic
community does what how we actually
observe and what did he what did he call
it he called it the ma the tablecloth
all right see the
now has it now so look if you look at
the bottom of the page you haveim
whenever you see that in the means We're
moving now to Reosha.
And he says it in spite of the fact that
they're not obligated. If women decide
that they want to wearis,
they're not prohibited from doing that.
They may and it's becomes a mitzvah
which you're not obligated to. has a
status of of that kind of mitzvah. But
then he goes on
like all others he says in every mitzvah
that's that women are excluded from they
have the right to do it. However, he
says
so he interesting enough. All right. Um
the the
he says it will look
if women wear it, it'll look like
they're str not strange. Uh means to
sort of to to to be arrogant, right? To
be arrogant. So he says in our community
that's how it will be interpreted and it
and should women should not wear sites.
Now that's a f this is a fascinating
development because what if society
changes
and it's no longer seen as and there are
murmurings I mean there are there there
are girls in in uh schools in in New
York uh particularly um in in Riverdale
I'm trying to think of the schools right
what
>> s right correct s um a number of girls
wanted to wear fillin
and it and fillin and it became a whole
issue in the school whether they would
be allowed to do it or not allowed to do
it. They were allowed actually and that
created its own stir in the community.
All right. So, so it's interesting to to
know that you know there's a struggle
here. All right. Let's go on. Well,
yeah. One last question now. I'll
>> say
to make a
>> Okay. So,
>> you don't have to.
>> Right. Correct. But you're right. But
but those mitzvah, why is this mitzvah
different than that? You're right. Good
question. First of all, you have to you
have to be careful because many of the
mitzvot
that women do that seem to be
they are required to do. Why? For
example, um shabas
not the negative but sham shabas. So
what does the gamarra say? Everyone who
is obligated in Zohar, which is not a
timebound mitzvah because you're
supposed to remember Shabas not only on
Shabas but every day. Everyone who's
obligated in Zohar is also obligated in
Shamore and therefore if women want to
make Kdish at home it's certainly
appropriate and allowed the question is
can they fulfill the responsibility of
men? I don't want to get into that whole
discussion but the point is there are
those mitzvot eating matzah
Eating matzah on pes is a mitzvah.
It's certainly a timebound mitzvah and
yet women are obligated to do that
because and this is a phrase that's used
often for this particular phenomenon
gam
right the origin of this mitzvah is
something was miraculous and they also
experienced it. So they have so it it's
incumbent upon them as well.
>> I'm sorry.
>> Uh again is a mitzvah is not a
requirement right now. Why? Why that's
not considered because a suka represents
the ananak why that's not considered a
mitzvah
so that it's a whole discussion but no
but but very often if you here in Israel
you have people who have half mer suka
right where you where portion of your
mere pestet is not blocked by the
overhang and very often what what
they'll do if is they'll say okay the
men will sit there and the women will
sit there so it's the responsibility
they're not incumbent it's not incumbent
upon them the certainly if they want to
that that okay next
>> does the motivation for the observance
come into play
>> does a motivation for the observance
come into play the answer is yes and and
but you can't legislate
easily based upon intent can't because
you know who's going to dis we're let
see one of the things that's very
interesting uh writing a book now about
the cycle of the year and one of the
questions that I ask is when it comes to
like shabas why is it that the negative
commandments are so clearly defined in
kaza but the positive commandments much
less so in other words kdish um having a
meal right the filling it with
appropriate atmosphere
that's personal. But the negative ones
can't be you can't do that by intent
because if you do that by intent person
will say yeah I'm not I I I'm going to
do this even though I I shouldn't
because I intended for the right reason.
All right. So, and and what you do, see
what happens is, and this is very
interesting, think about it.
The fact that there are uniform
requirements basically on Shabbat in
terms of the negative requirements
makes the observance of Shabbat
consistent universally. Meaning what?
that in spite of the fact that we have
different customs and we if you walk
into a community anywhere in the world
and it's a an observant community, this
is the way you observe Shabbat. And the
fact I've told you this, the fact that
that's so is miraculous. The fact that
we've held on to that and that the hala
has maintained our identity and we've
maintained the hala is really something
extraordinary.
Okay. Next
method. Okay, here now here uh we've got
the method meaning what is the intent of
the mitzvah and how does it take place?
So the intent of the mitzvah is
seeing that you're going to what? You're
going to remember all the commandments.
How what why is seeing the sitsis going
to remind me you know make me think of
all the commandments and and and it says
mitzvah this is a quote from the garis
is like equivalent to all the
commandments in other words it's a it's
very very important
so how is it going to remind me so you
find two different
planes here two different um areas of of
answer. The first one is there are
symbols within
within theote
that if you know them and are aware of
them, they will remind you of mitzvot.
All right? But they're this is something
that not everybody's aware of. But for
example, if you take a look and I'm not
a usually not a big fan of gumatria, but
this is this is what is brought by
Rashi. Minan gamatria shows
the matri of the word is 600im
eightim. Why? because every every um
everyone has four but they're really two
doubled over right
and five five knots on each on each
friends that what does that bring you
613 so that's that's why will remind you
next
I'm reading down at the bottom of page
five
>> [snorts]
>> You should remember, you should wear all
day because it will make you remember
the Torah all day. Why? He says, and
here this is, I think, a little
easier to see.
the
there are five five knots.
It's not the part he doesn't use it for
that.
He says five knots are themselves
symbolic of
Torah and four corners
everywhere. God is everywhere. Okay. So
that that is one direction
by which the commentaries understand the
methodology of what what the citists do
in terms of its intent. Its intent is to
make you remember the mitzvah and one
way of looking at it is through the
matri is through the knots is through
the but there's another way another
aspect of that are very important and if
you turn to page six
I'm going to tell you a story
that the garamarus tells but I I left
most of it out
you you'll soon see why.
All right. So what happened and I I call
this insurance. Why
the mitzvah?
There was a man who was very very
pontilious. Right. When it came to
observing the mitzvah of
Shinotellis
Bisara.
He heard that there was a a harlot, a
prostitute
somewhere old distant lands
who was so exceptional that she took 400
400 pieces of silver for what she did.
He says, "So he said, "Oh my, oh my,
this is this is person." What of gold?
That's Thank you. Thank you. Correct.
Correct. Correct. 400. Correct. 400
pieces of gold. Zhuven. Zahu. Thank you
very much. All right. I uh I I'm
maligned her uh inappropriately. All
right. So the Gomorrah then goes on to
tell a whole story which I cut out. All
right. which is he he goes there and and
she has like a number of beds and each
bed you're on you're doing this it's
whatever and each and and he goes to the
last moment he is sitting on the top bed
and he's not wearing clothes and she's
not wearing clothes when all of a sudden
what happens
the came and slapped him in the face.
All right.
He said, "I can't do this." Now, what
does it mean nish that it slapped him in
the face? I as a rabbi and I can tell
you many of my colleagues have heard
stories about people who come and tell
us, you know, I was about to do X, but
when I realized that I was wearing sit,
I couldn't do it. I wouldn't do it. And
that's the second direction. The second
direction is the very existence of a
garment that is a of a religious nature
which you're wearing on a regular
consistent basis that reminds you you
know what what it's all about that
reminds you to stay on the straight and
narrow and again and again I as I said
it's not just a story in the Gora I have
people have said to me and to my co I
was going to do that but I was wearing
sometimes it's the amaka but more often
it's the sit seat
of Yoseph.
>> Right. Right. Correct. The case where
where Yoseph
>> does was was tempted and didn't didn't
act. All right. Well, yes. Last comment.
>> They should do with
But they can't feel at that moment off
whatever it is and they end up becom
>> okay. All right.
>> Okay. This is a
>> No, no, no, no. You're you're talking
about a reality. You're talking I
reality which is that every object
that's supposed to make us do something
on a regular basis eventually becomes
kind of wrote unless we it becomes a
particular moment at a particular time
and the question you're asking which is
if I'm going to do this should I take
off my titus that's no that's not the
answer that's not the answer the answer
is keep on your titis and don't do it
Right. But uh but very often people will
say, you know, if I'm wearing a yamaka,
can I I can't? And the answer is, yeah,
you're right. People are going to look
at it. They're going to say, you
shouldn't be doing this, so you
shouldn't be doing it. Yes. Uh all
right. Go ahead.
>> Oh, what? Where it sits is inside and
where it sits is outside. Right.
>> There. Okay.
Okay, thank you. Um, many men, including
yours personally, wear their titsis
inside,
>> right? As opposed to my sons, two of
them, who wear the titsis outside. So,
>> what?
>> No, no, no.
>> Israel.
>> No, it's not American in Israel. It's
it's even in an America, it's dependent
upon where they are. The answer is that
those who wear it outside are most
clearly fulfilling the mitzvah of
those who wear it inside are basically
saying this is a personal mitzvah and it
and it the awareness that I have it is
supposed to be my own. I shouldn't I
don't necessarily have to announce it to
the outside world. But my my wife keeps
arguing with me and says I should start
wearing them outside. But anyway, that's
um [laughter]
All right. Okay. So, next. All right.
So, so that but that's an important
piece of all this, isn't it? The
insurance that sits create the insurance
that other aspects of Judaism create,
which is if I'm going to I can't do this
if can't do this if I'm wearing
scissors. I can't do this if right. So,
therefore, it creates it keeps you on
the straight and narrow. Now, next.
All right. Is very interesting. What
does it say in the Torah? It says you
should have pat
on your
There should be a at least one thread of
blue.
All right. So, what what happened over
time? What happened over time is we lost
the knowledge
of what exactly that blue is
and how to create it. Now let the
Gomorrah actually describe listen to
what it the Gammorra says. It's at the
top. It's uh uh I don't think you have
it on your page. You may um on page six
in mine. Tanya I think I wrote it
afterwards.
Why is different from any other color?
Because is a color that is similar to
the sea. And the sea is similar to the
heavens. And the heavens are similar to
God's throne. And therefore is
significant because it reminds us of
those things. But the Torah doesn't say
exactly in a sense this is a in other
words why why is necessary? Now we'll
see. So let's first talk about the the
the actual
physicality.
What happened was we lost. We lost. We
didn't we weren't able to define what
teles was and we weren't able to define
how to create it. In the n late 1880s,
the Radi Radisioner Rebi,
the founder of that particular group of
Rabbam
felt that he was going to find out what
Teles was. had he traveled extensively,
had he researched extensively and he
came to the conclusion
that the kles is something that is
produced by a fish called the
cuddlefish.
I'm not sure what a cuddlefish is, but
all right. And therefore, he said that
to all of his adherence,
we're wearing this on our sit. were
putting in the telet that that I say is
comes from the cuttlefish.
However, it was scientifically debunked
because they began to realize that the
only reason that product was blue was
not because of the cuttlefish. It was
because of how you were treating it,
what you were doing to it. In other
words, it wasn't inherently
Fast forward to today and there was
another actually again decades before us
Rabbit Herzog begins to do what finally
comes to fruition in our time and that
is real research into what could
possibly be the teles. Now the Gomorrah
tells us that it comes from the kila
zone. The problem is we don't know what
ailah zone is right. So, so therefore
research has developed
based upon tabutic literature based upon
the fact that that this particular um
type of snail was used in dying. We
found archaeological evidence.
The conclusion came that
a certain category of d of snails
let me just look at the whole category
again the murex family all right certain
category of snails
have a subcategory
which is called and I'm not sure I'm
pronouncing it the right way
um hexoplelex truncolus
All right. So apparently the hexoplas
tranullus according to the research of
many today is the kila zone of the garam
and therefore there are num many many
people there therefore those people who
felt this was correct began to produce
began to sell teles and there are many
within our community who wear tles today
there are those who Don't I don't so far
but I might [laughter] all right in
other words it's it's not everyone
agrees that this is not everyone agrees
but very
someone like our hersel shar for example
in in the yeshiva university who's
considered now the pretty much the
postake for yeshiva university he wears
talis all right so it's it's certainly
gained
a a good deal of acceptance but not it
has not gained ained total acceptance
universal. Okay. And there and you see
if the argument that they do it's based
on talmutic description, archaeological
evidence, historical records, chemical
analysis, geographic correspondence. In
other words, they they base it on real
real evidence
and uh and yeah,
I went to visit them,
>> right?
>> And every those who know anything about
chemistry, any chemical has a chemical
signature that can be measured by
something called NMR spectrum. By the
way, for the machine
>> righted
by the
value was 63.
>> All right. So I'm going to repeat that
because it's it's it's worthy of
repetition. All right. And that is uh
the some the evidence is additional
evidence is apparently that if you uh
when they do the chemical analysis and
they isolate the the actual definition
the as you say the nano whatever uh it
is the the the
um the number that is given to this
particular
cell that to the product of this
particular snail is 613.
All right. Now, uh now I'd like you just
to look at we're sort of going to round
things out by taking a look at at an
example
of how
a good approaches a particular
technical law which has no reason given
in the Torah.
But we're allowed to struggle and try to
find and in this case it's Rafelic
and I'll just read with you. Take a
look. Rafelic basically is saying that
the
combination of the white and blue
threads is a very important combination
in scientific inquir inquiry. The
physical sciences etc. lend themselves
to mathematical pre precision. This is
the RV speaking by the way. He people
don't know he he someone once came in to
the bus and said, "Oh, you know, I I saw
the I I hear the RV uses a thesaurus
when he writes." And the next person
said, "Yes, the rv corrects the
thesaurus." All right. All right.
You you just you he really is a perfect
example of of merging worlds together
and maintaining one's equilibrium. It is
when the focus of the inquiry changes to
man's psyche
that abstract varities and that act and
and aptitude and uncertainty intrude.
The universe will yield its secrets to
the or organized scientific pursuit but
the one thread of
pertains to the spiritual realm where
man is humbled by the mystery of
existence. So in in terms of our lives
and in terms of our experience, there
are aspects of in in terms of let's take
it differently because it's going to be
in terms of scientific inquiry that's
really that level. What he's saying is
there's the white and the blue. There
are aspects where you're going to be
able to find answers and there are at
where you won't. He then says in our
personal lives
we have all had periods even even of an
extended nature which are rational
planned and predictable where we feel we
have hold on events at other times
mystery and puzzlement intervened
dislocating the pattern of our lives and
frustrating our planning
I I don't think that needs any
explanation obviously I Rabbi Lamb um
speaking to a group of
speaking to a group of rabbis to be of
which I was one in the group said any
any any convers philosophical
conversation you ever have with any of
your congregants will eventually
b come down to one thing sadic vlo
why do good things happen to bad people
and why do bad things happen to good
people in other words divine find
justice and we're all bothered by it. We
all find it inexplicable and that's what
the rub is saying. The rub is saying
there are going to be aspects in your
personal life where it's going to make
sense and there are going to be aspects
in your personal life where it's not
going to make sense. And that's why we
have both colors. And then finally, he
says something that we've stressed a
lot. If Jewish history operated solely
with white, we would not be fighting for
Israel today. From the standpoint of
reason and logistics, our efforts
against imponderable odds are insane.
All right. Now, that we've we've spoken
about this. The fact is the fact that
you and I are sitting here is is against
every rule, every societal and
historical rule that exists. It just
shouldn't have happened.
Only people sustained by te could be
motivated to constitute a state after
2,000 years of exile. Nations governed
only by wakas
incredulously and derisively derisively.
U the fact, you know, he's he's not
talking about he he's not alive now, but
this certainly
rings true today. They're mocking us a
lot. The garment of Jewish life will yet
possess both blue and white and our
historical yearnings and sacrifices will
be vindicated. There will come a time he
says when the merging of blue and white
will exist and that is yamos mashiach.
So it's a very beautiful way of thinking
about the sitote as the white and the
blue of certainty and uncertainty.
Okay. Yeah. Well,
>> flag of Ami Israel, blue and white.
Correct. Correct. Comes from them. All
right. All right. We're going to stop
there. Um, we had an opportunity to view
a mitzvah and its parameters. Uh, we'll
go on from there. All right. Be well.