Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Did you know that the forgotten founder
of Zionism went on to play a leading
role in audas Israel or that Rafataly
was responsible for the continued
presence of the Muslim wack on Harabias?
It turns out that the margins of history
tell the real story. Behind the Times
dives into the big concepts and
overlooked moments that carry vast
meaning all through the lens of Torah
and rabbitic thought. This is Jewish
history like you've never heard it
before. Behind the times with Rabbi
Ephraim Zalma Galinski and Gdalia Gutag.
Let's begin with a story that may or may
not be true.
So sometime in the 1930s or maybe in the
40s, two very powerful personalities got
into a car in London.
One was the head of Shell the oil
company, a British government minister,
a wealthy Jewish aristocrat.
This was a man called Sir Robert Why
Cohen who was used to the head then of
the United Synagogue who was used to
leading the Rabbonim around by the nose
and controlling things. The other
powerful personality and this man looked
like a very powerful personality was
Diansky
known to British posterity as Dino Brsky
and the story goes that Roberty Cohen
got into the car first. He didn't look
that the head of the London based in
should get him first. He got a tap on
the shoulder with a stick with a
rabbitic stick. It was Dabsky. Dabsky
said,
"You get it. I get him first." Now that
story of Fry Zamagalinski
may or may not be true,
>> but that is a perfect story to exemplify
who Rascal was. But you'll have to
explain to us what does the United
Synagogue mean? How does British jury
structured? Because you have to say the
truth. An American classical American
listener will not understand anything
about the whole structure cuz there is
no there is no structured congregation,
Jewish congregation of in in America.
Everything is private. So this is why
the classical American listener is going
to have to be hold on and uh and this is
going to be the substance of this
episode to understand and unpack the
meaning of that story because that story
is whether whether or not it's true
exemplifies who was and defines to my
mind one the one the great Gdelim of the
20th century and what he did or
was a self-made godle
Right. We're going to see in another
episode two of this series that he was
largely basically raised himself before
come to Yeshiva. He became a godle
without them. He was a self-made godle
who went on to become a talmid of bris
of of brisk
>> at later stages in life. Not asshiba.
not baka who went on to stand up become
one of the last leading rabbon in Russia
and continued to defy the communists
after the communist takeover won the
last great Rabonim there who therefore
stood up to Stalin ended up in Siberia
and then was in in the 1930s appointed
the head of the London which was that
time a very very koshv seat half a
million Jews and if essentially the head
of the basin of the British Empire uh as
it still as it still was then and this
is where I come to the crunch and this
is in terms of the definition who he is
and what he's going to be doing. He was
such a powerful patra personality that
he was able to stand up in the in the
face of the liberalism that was taking
over Britain. The Jewish liberals were
talking about the reform that will
threaten to engulf British jury in the
same way as it eventually did in the
America
>> which is fascinating that British jury
is the only jury that managed to block
the reform from entering the official
rabinet and that's what you're going to
be talking about
>> and this is correct and this is the
contention I'm going to be quoting my
father John Gutenag who was who was a
senior member of the what was then the
United Synagogue Gabinet um in England
and it's is something that I've absorbed
from him and I want to develop this
thesis that it was this uh very very
strong role played by Donna Brmsky
that's standing up in the 30s and 40s
and stopping the tide and turning things
back and enabling as it were this
blocking movement on the reform. So if
if I had to get
>> which is aish to itself that one person
managed to change the tide.
>> You know it's it may be overselling it.
It may indeed be overselling it. But if
I had to give this particular episode a
title I'd say Dramsky the godle you know
who saved an empire. That may that may
be it maybe there's too much of a
literary flourish. We we hear that
general streak out of
>> the you can't you can't encourageable
you can't irreressible you can't hold a
journalist with a headline is
unstoppable.
>> So that is my contention. I'd like to
unpack that. As you say you we're going
to need to go gently for the rest of the
world for the global audience over here
to understand just what it is why we get
getting hot under the collar about a god
in England in the 30s and 40s. I think
just to take this away, we need a bit of
just a very short background ex who was
and we're going to actually be unpacking
more of this in the second episode which
is relevant then but it suffice it to
say that um the theatkll was he was born
in a little village and I think most
important thing to know about this
village there wasn't even a minion there
but again we're going to get to that
labramsky was born in 1886 lived in 1976
and he was born in a place near Bellarus
which is now Bellarus called Dashkovichi
or something like that. You Dashkovichi
or something like that but okay you have
to be a native or a local to really
pronounce these things. His parents were
were good people but they were far from
rabbitic stock. He had a shass at home
which was not a usual thing but and I
think this is the most important thing
to know about him frime he grew up in a
village with aettle when you talk about
I don't think you can get any more of
aettle than this because it didn't have
a minion it didn't have a minion and he
stayed there till age till age 17 by
which stage I don't want to give all the
all the details away but by which stage
he had become enough of a godle that
when he was headunted very literally by
the way by by noadic when they came to
hear of this illloy boy learning on his
own in this outlying village. They
brought him to Nadok and he ended up
going very rapidly through the yeshivas
within a year of arriving in yeshiva. He
had sma from
>> he was of noar
>> no. So this gives you an idea. This is
an intensely unusual path for a godle to
take. No minion, no nothing. He is there
the self-made godle. By the way, spoiler
alert, that is the title of basically of
the of the second episode. So we're not
going to go too much into that. But what
happens? He becomes the rav if I'm not
mistaken of of Slutzk. Now Slutzk
is a very Kasha Rabinut because
>> that is a jump. What you just did now is
a jump because you jumped the stage that
he he got married to a Kasha R's
daughter. That Kashbar RV in turn was
the son-in-law of the Ridbaz who was the
R of Slotsk. When the ribbas left
Slutzk, he gave the Raonus over to
Suzalman who is Rashiva in Slutzk. And
when Suzman left Slutzk, it went back to
the family and went to Rascarski.
Akaskar became the RV of Slutzk where
his wife's grandfather
was the original RV and that's where he
was taken to Siberia
under Soviet. So as we said before he
defied in Stalin's time teaching as a ma
major visible postrav there in Slutzk
and his in this storied rabbinet and so
we're not going to get that much into uh
the the the whole parish of of what he
did in Soviet Russia why he escaped.
Suffice it just to say that when he was
eventually released, he'd become
extremely extremely high-profile,
internationally well-known Rav and
clearly one of the biggest rising stars
in the GDM of of young Gdylam. Then he
was he had to leave behind his children.
I think couple of his sons instead of as
including one who was called Shiman and
>> who became a communist. He became a
Jewish communist.
>> Correct. And if if if I'm not mistaken,
he was one of the founders of the of
Britain's Communist Party. So he was a
Stalinist supporter, at least a
supporter of the regime. And he was in
fact Dramky was extremely sad because he
was be he was clearly even in Stalin's
time, it was too much for the regime to
they didn't want the fuss of of of you
know killing or incarcerating anymore
such a famous Jewish figure. So they let
him go. They basically expelled him with
and kept his sons at least Shimon and
perhaps another one of them as a you
know security security of guarantees of
good behavior. there of Haskell
shouldn't be speaking out against
>> should speak out against the regime and
he came and Shiman in fact was you know
tragically he and he used to say during
Dabramski said in those years he was
heartbroken by the thought that his son
who was so you know shaky in his Yiddish
was there in this terrible regime a land
of of of cure I think it was I think it
was Rush Feinstein who said who compared
the Soviet Union to a giant basis a
giant toilet he said this is country in
which you cannot mention God's name. So
I'm not mistaken. He said it's like it's
a that's why he said he had to get out
of it. There's no it's a a country like
that you cannot live in. However much
mysterious nephesh the kafir in it is is
so so strong. It must be said that there
was eyewitness I I I might be able to
remember his name that he saw the
interaction between Bransonsky and this
son Shim later on in life when Shim is
coming to visit his father and he says
and the kerva between and his son which
was warm then he was even learning with
him by the way and uh it didn't it
didn't cause a rift between them. So
yes, I I in fact saw saw a report about
that someone from the I don't I don't
recall who now was in came to Abaka came
to learn and after again jumping the gun
but he eventually comes to learn move
and he's a Rav from the early 1930s to
1951 in England raving that basin of
London and he then he comes to the last
quarter of century where he becomes one
of the leaders of of world in fact then
and he was a very very powerful
personality it's important to say if you
ever seen a picture of Khatlabsky You
will see pictures don't lie because you
see the sheer power of the personality
there. There was if you just put into
the internet you're going to see you
know Google search Dina Bramsky you will
see phrases like the giant or or the
massive personality and I know my
grandfather Oliver Mr. Max Mel Gutenag
was you know he said that he was wasn't
a big man it was a small a short man but
a powerful presence
>> his presence was when he walked down the
street you couldn't ignore him I even
sent you a color video which was rare
for those years of him walking down the
streets of Israel with his lul
in by master where he lived and anyway
but the point being that as you pointed
out over here there was a softer side
this baka said he he you know he said he
came in to this to to to to visit Dana
Bramsky who was a legend to any British
baka. It was learning in Ara you had to
go and I mean to to go and visit Dina
Brmsky and he was involved in cultura
teaching cultura gave a share there at
that stage and he came in and he saw
that Dina Brsky was sitting there over a
gamora with somebody who's sitting there
without a yamla. I mean that must been
an incredible sight to see the god Lador
sitting there learning something without
yamoka. was Shim Abramsky and the son
and this was the way that they that they
as it were bonded his the rakmonos that
his he wanted to keep like ahead of his
time perhaps this wouldn't be surprising
anymore you know you know people are
very much you know keep try and keep
people with him but the sight of Dina
Bransky learning with someone learning
gar some of that yamoka that is an
unbelievable thing his that was his
softer side
>> you mentioned before about that the uh
the his mere appearance was of power
like a lion like
>> so I I I I I read a story somewhere I
don't remember the exact source that uh
you you'll be getting to this later on
is that he once had to appear in court
defending his policy that the the kash
of the in England should be under the
opices of the of his bezdon and they
took him to court. I think that there's
a Tim whoever took him to court and and
Dian Labramsky walked in there and
against protocol he stood up in front of
the judges which is you know unheard of
in in England you know the the whole
decor of you can describe that for the
listeners
>> with their wigs right with the white
flowing wigs and he said I want you to I
want you to know that if I give a on
this meat I am defying my role as a pisk
and a role as serving the public which
is against democracy and I am not
willing to do that and the judge wrote
in the plin says we're not accustomed to
this but the old lion roared in our
courtroom and he's right
>> wow that is I didn't know the old the
old lion thing I've seen that used as
title I didn't know that's where it
originated I think this is going to be a
very crucial part of the story here his
character Because it's not enough to
have vast Torah knowledge if you if you
don't have a thermime and b the rocklike
uh the rock-like and unmoving power and
strength of personality to stand up to
what's opposing you. You wouldn't you
won't achieve anything. And this is what
the crucial qualities. Not only was he
one of the undisputed Gdali Israel, he
also had this tremendous power of
personality that enabled him to achieve
what he achieved. Now, let's get into
that and and understand the context. We
got a bit of context to understand.
Number one, something I've quoted
before, which is the context. We know
all over all over the world talk about
the 1930s4s.
If you went across Western Europe and
you went to and you went in in America,
the the Torah world didn't exist then.
was a a few you know we talk about or
even orthodoxy was very shva in England
or was more more accurately Britain
together with its you know its empires
you had like what's happening in America
>> sorry for the amiratis
>> to explain to us what's the difference
between England and Britain
>> okay so so until this very day you have
when you talk about Americans like talk
about British right so great Britain is
composed of different countries
confusingly there's great Britain then
there's United Kingdom. So let's just
talk about the United Kingdom, right?
Which is composed essentially of four
different countries. You have the
country of England, which is the
dominant part of the country. Uh most
people, most money, most of the of the
land mass. Then you have Scotland.
There's enormous to the north. Then you
have Wales and you have back in the day
100 years ago, you had Ireland, now only
Northern Ireland because they made the
rebellion and they they shut it off. But
that is considered that's the United
Kingdom. But at the time the British
Empire was and this is really important
because when Dina Bramsky was the basin
of London which is an officially which
is connected to the United Synagogue is
the basin of the United Synagogue which
is the group of synagogues of Schul
which are Orthodox and they comprise
they're recognized by the government. So
the chief rabbi of the United Synagogue
has a basin which the London basin which
is essentially recognized as an official
representative of the Jewish community
until this day. And back in the day
around the time that Diansky was the
dian there, this was not a community of
less than quarter million Jews. It was
more than half a million Jews plus the
countries overseas part of the British
Empire. Then Australia, you had South
Africa, you had New Zealand, you had
other little places as well. Very
significant Jewish communities who took
their direction.
>> All these communities were under the
direction of
>> correct. So for example, if anyone who
knows South Africa has a very capable
and special chief rabbi today, which is
chief rabbi Warren Goldstein. Well, he
was the first South African native as it
was South Africanborn chief rabbi in the
job until then. I remember I remember
chief rabbi Sirill Harris who was an
Englishman. In fact, I think he was a
Scotsman if I'm not mistaken. Um I
remember him. So he was the chief rabbi
of South Africa.
>> So when you say Britain, you mean the
Brit British Empire. his
>> when you're talking about England,
you're talking about the country within
the empire called England.
>> Correct. But we use it interchangeably.
If you grow up, at least in my time, we
did not think of ourselves as British.
We thought of as English and thought
that the Welsh were also English and the
Scots were also confusingly. The point
is Dina Bramsky was appointed in 1931 or
two if not to be the chief rabbi of the
London basin which made him effectively
the senior py or the pisk for the
British Empire technically. That's what
it would have that's what it meant.
That's the context in terms of the the
architecture of the community of the
institutions. There's another crucial
piece of context which is like when when
you talk about in America, New York or
anywhere else the Yiddish kite was very
very in England you had the United
Synagogue which is unique in that
>> this is very important what you're
saying there because you on the one hand
you're saying that the official
structure was was orthodox
but the kamitsus beel was very weak.
Correct. Right. You have to try to
explain that to us. Why? Why isn't that
a steer? Cuz if you would tell me that
the Yiddish kite was when the official
structure was, let's say, reform or
conservative, I can understand that. But
you're telling me that in England, this
is the only place that managed to stay
under orthodoxy till today. And at the
same time, you're saying that the
Yiddish kite at that time was at a low.
So try to explain to this apparent
contradiction. Let me just tell you just
in terms of how low it was. start with
that and I'll explain how that how that
could be just how low it was. So there's
a there was that one of the first
battles that he had to undertake, Dana
Brownsky had to to fight the fact that
in shops or butchers that were selling
meat under a London based in Ha they
were selling meat without nicor right so
without doing what was called porging
takeaway taking away essentially the was
the gdanosha in inside the in the high
>> people were eating isoriza
>> correct they were selling it in the same
shop meaning it was kind of like nicer
and non-nicer going the same thing in it
>> if if you were observant you'd be able
to choose lose kosher parts, correct? Or
it it was just it was the wild west. It
was the literally the wild west going on
over there. And before he came in, he
used the leverage. He he found out about
it. He said, "I cannot take
responsibility for this place." He said
that a condition is to shut down these
shops. So immediately even before he got
into the job, he began his battle to you
know to fight back and raise standards
standards that that officially existed
but but in reality didn't. Just one more
mara mock what you know just to
understand exactly how how difficult
things were back in the day. So the the
blade gurvitz who was who became
rashivate said when he arrived in London
in the 1920s he said he saw a fish monga
wrapping fish and then he saw that the
fish wrapping the the wrapping paper had
he been writing on it. He was shocked to
see when he went along he saw it was a
terrible sight was kadesh this fish
manga but the father was obviously a
lambdan and the father had a son who was
a fish manga who wasn't a shalam done
and what a terrible thing to to see he
just was rapping you know you talk about
you know yesterday's news is to is
tomorrow's fish rapper or whatever this
was this was the case yesterday's were
tomorrow's fish rapper
>> so now you you owe us an explanation
like how is this possible
>> so how's it possible that that as you
say you can have an an infrastructure
that is officially orthodox but in
reality is all over the place and in
terms of practice is like in America
reform whatever it was. So the answer is
it goes back to and this is what the
story we opened with that may or may not
have happened with Sir Robert why Cohen.
So, Robert Way Cohen was, as I say, a
government minister. He was he was a,
you know, involved, I think, in in
Shell, the massively wealthy, and he was
part of an extended family that
controlled the United Synagogue for many
decades. They this family came to be
known as the cousinhood. The cousinhood.
I mean, he really has a ring to it. What
it was was old Jewish patrician
families, very noble, very assimilated,
kind of the the Rothschilds, the
Montigus, the Samuels. Now, when we talk
about the Samuels, so anyone who's who
knows, I can see you gesturing. The
first British high commiss commissioner
under the British mandate over here was
the Herbert Samuel. For anyone who is,
you know, there's they have a chain of
hotel upmarket hotels here called
Herbert Samuel Hotels, right? and he was
with
>> as an an aside story
>> I don't think it was one of the who said
that he remembers the women in the
nashim the shs in meim were crying
when they heard that Herbert Samuel is
becoming the high commissioner why is
that it's the first time a Jew is
becoming the governor of Isisol for over
1,500 years they thought it was Msiah
Titan
It's that good learned out from that. He
says, you know, don't get excited so
easily, right? I remember the old
Yiddish mamas crying whenever it was,
but at the end he was pressured from all
sides and uh it didn't uh didn't help
the Jews and soul too much.
>> Correct. Well, actually, if you're
talking about uh detours and so let me
tell you about something that happened
um the time that I met Sir Herbert
Samuel's granddaughter. Listen to this.
I tell you this one. It was quite a few
years ago. Arrived in Svas and had the
bright idea. I think it was newly
married. Had the bright idea to to stay
overnight just to write wash up at the
place and find somewhere in the old city
to stay. Well, it turned out we couldn't
find anywhere to stay because it was the
Klesma Festival. The place is cho
blocks. Nowhere to no place to find
nowhere to stay. We eventually driving
around for ages. as you described the
listeners that that's the week when the
old the streets of the old city of are
filled with with cles players.
>> Correct. It's it's impossible. It's a
three-day festival and there was no
place to be had. We eventually found
someone I think on in the old city of
and we knocked and somebody said knock
on this door. We knocked on the door.
This people had this um you know one
room to rent. We said fine. The lady was
a breast level lady. Okay. And she she
was she welcomed us, you know, as a
breast of a couple. She welcomed us and
she said and I said I noticed something
interesting about the accent. It was
both Israeli but very very very English.
An Israeli who had traces of ext extreme
English accent. And I said where do you
get the accent? She said from my mother.
I said where's your mother from? She
said she was brought up on an estate
outside Cambridge. I said what do you
mean? She said, and this is a breast of
a lady right in the intensely part, she
said, "My grandfather was Sir Herbert
Samuel."
>> Wow.
>> That is unbelievable.
>> That is not that that
>> you managed to surprise me.
>> It was an unbelievable thing. I've since
tried to track her down. I know where
where it is. I've been past. She moved
away. I have no idea what she's called.
So, if she is listening, please we this
is this this is your moment. Please come
forward. This is an appeal for missing
information. Getting back to this the
cousinhood over here. Let me read to you
to understand the context of which the
lay leadership the Rabonim were orthodox
and the people many of the members of
the of the United Synagogue the bulk of
Anglo jury as it was called was not was
was in not not practicing meaning the
shul that they didn't go to most of the
time was was orthodox till and remains
so today which which is our story
>> they needed the orthodox rabbi for
marriage I guess
>> no but it was more than that it was more
of a frame they wanted to be orthodox
unlike in America occurs still today if
you ask the you know reform exists in
England but it's not the the mainstream
which is the people who may look and
practice uh basically unidentifiable
that undistinguishable rather from
reform essentially belong and will get
married under an orthodox based in and
and ro and let me read out to you an
essay from the American commentary
magazine that I found sometime n October
and and and it's just this is is gold.
It's worth it's worth quoting the
difference and he's talking about the
the difference between England and
America and the fact that America if you
don't keep if you're not Orthodox you're
not orthodox you're reform in England
you're going to have this strange
situation where people are not observant
yet the shu that they don't go to much
is orthodox and so so whoever it was
wrote this essay in October 1964 in
commentary magazine he said like this
the difference can be traced to the role
of the old patrician angl Jewish
families who founded the United
Synagogue in 1870 as a Jewish equivalent
to the Church of England. These
families, the Rothschilds, the
Montigues, the Samuels, etc. were rarely
observant Jews, but they gave their
names, money, and time in approximately
that order to the United Synagogue out
of a sense of duty. It was the thing to
do for any English gentleman who
happened to be.
>> This is fascinating. They had to show
the goyam that we too have a a system.
>> You're so you're so you're so right
because by the way until my father who
was a rabbi in the United Synagogue he
wore and still wears you know a rabbitic
kapot frack what's a frack a frock coat
right and and because the up to then it
had been the practice in the United
Synagogue that they wore what were
called canonicals. canonicals are
basically these dark black robes that
look very much like the priest the
church of England and that because one
of the chief rabbis going back a while
had decided to make the United Synagogue
much more like the church of England and
I tell you another thing I remember
growing up in Manchester there were
these there were the
who who were raon in all but name what
were they officially called reverend
reverend like the church of England why
would there be such a name because in
the United synagogue you it was all
aping this church of England situation
very sad
>> now why didn't they I understand the
need I understand the need to create a
institution which is parallel to the
church all right but why didn't they
create this institution under reform
conservative maybe they weren't there at
the time
>> I think remember this is going back to
the 1870s and let me just finish this
quote over here because I think could
help over here it said it was
They gave their time to the United
Synagogue out of a sense of duty. It was
a thing to do for any English gentleman
who happened to be quote unquote of the
Jewish faith being more or less
indifferent to religious matters. They
had no objection to the nominally
orthodox nature of the United Synagogue
normally because they didn't demand
>> since it wasn't for them.
>> Correct. Didn't demand too much from
them. So they could paradoxically
enough. Therefore, the United Synagogue
was for decades led by men who neither
believed in its doctrines nor practiced
its rituals. I mean, what an
opportunity.
>> No, what's interesting here is is that
secretly people would respect if it it's
not m they'll respect orthodoxy more
than the watered down version of
conservative. As long as it's not m
doesn't demand for them much. They're
willing to keep that as like the nominal
umbrella. I think you have to understand
it does say something about the British
character. British character is a
non-revolutionary character. Remember
conservative conservatives
conservative not the not the political
party right it's it's just to conser
correct it's something about the British
character they don't like revolutions
the last time they had a revolution was
you know was they chopped off the head
of a king was 500 years ago and they and
they basically regretted it immediately
so so the there is something
conservative about the British character
and as you correct it's it was all very
nice and civilized they could you could
orthodoxy was very very civilized ized
they could build these enormous
cathedrals of sh everything carried on
that way. I think there is something
about the British character in that. But
the net effect then was that Danabramsky
was coming in to a nominally officially
orthodox environment but that was very
hostile to too much piety. Right? That's
another thing about the British.
>> Here comes the big question. Here comes
the big question. Why did they need
Diana Ramsky?
>> So good. And
>> you tell me that they chose Lord
Jacobitz, right? Or Rabbi Jonathan Saxs
after I can understand that. I mean
that's but Dabski is an old East
European style RV. So we're going to
come back to that to at least named Lord
Lord Jakovitz in a minute because he was
essentially it was only thanks to Dino
Brsky's existence and and standard
setting that he was able to come in over
there in a sense. He was a Talmid. But
why did they bring him in? very
important question and the answer to
that goes back to the fact that in in
that the United Synagogue was not the
only show in town from the turn of in in
the in the ready in the late 19th
century you had waves of Jews coming
over from Russia like they came to Eric
Israel like they flooded into the lower
east side of New York they're flooding
into the east end of London which is
where the immigrants
>> and these are more Hamiship Eden
>> correct and they start founding they
found other organizations today if you
go to England you're going to find in
London you're going to find three main
botted din or three botted rather in
London. You're going to find the United
Synagogue based in London based in which
has very on him till this day. You're
going to find what's known as the
federation uh which has also very on him
you know full disclosure my my older
brother is in their ranks and you're
going to find the third thing which is
the kadasia which many people know the
ha that was associated with the padva
etc. But essentially
>> it's more it's more theim more.
>> Yeah. Yeah, but it's more even it's it's
Kadashia is is not just the it's also
the echos of gold is green part of
Kadashia, right? It was so essentially
got these three bott you had the London
based in which was affiliated with the
United Synagogue recognized by the
government which is the oldest. What
happens? They come along and the
newcomers start feeling that this the
standards alone no anything
>> they're not going to buy meat in a place
that sells non- nicer meat. Even if at
that time that wasn't the case
eventually you see how the federation
develops and it starts developing as a
big network of synagogues of shs and
then the kadas kadi now kadasia
>> now the federation is like a separate
unit
>> totally
>> but is recognized by the government
>> well no the federation has no
necessarily a standing it doesn't have a
chief rabbi it has an a basin that that
based in the federation today
who was once the the ra of gates and
before that was of If I'm not mistaken
before that was another very who was my
brother's father-in-law
Denstein and um and then you had you had
also very himw
padwa great
>> is there any official function that like
the federation and the kadasu would need
the United Synagogue to vouch for them
like to
>> not in an outright formal sense because
the United Synagogue and its chief rabbi
has standing with the ments on issues of
wider orthodox importance, they he will
go to the government, but it's more
informal. That's my sense. He he's the
biggest stakeholder there in the room,
but he's not the only stakeholder,
orthodox stakeholder.
>> So, we're going back. So, we're saying
so there there was an influx of of of
immigrants,
>> Eastern European,
>> right? And they were taking away the uh
the power from the United Synagogue.
Correct. It's like in politics today, if
a right-wing party, which is outflanked
on the right by another one that's more
right-wing or a leftwing party that's
another one more to the left, it will
inevitably um draw the larger party into
its orbit. Exactly as politics works.
The same way the Balabatim who the
business people and the and the and the
you know the men of influence who led
the lay people who led the United
Synagogue said we're losing we have
we're losing we need a credible figure
who can be listened to in Stamford Hill
right which is the area which is a
growing population. It wasn't it wasn't
Stan Stanford Hill today but it was back
then it was the east end of London which
is now a Muslim area. And so they said,
"Who can we get?" And they looked
around. They saw Dina Bramsky. I think
what they identified there was they saw
this was a figure of of giant stature,
but also a figure who was as it were who
they knew was was going to take
responsibility for Kalistra.
>> So he came from Russia and he before he
came to the London Bezen, he was a
Ravul. I understand before that I mean
his first stellar was a RV
>> of a shul in the in in the east end
which was the marika dashul now the
marika dashul was again exist today in
in gold is green it's got a wonderful
young ro and it's I go go there bin as
money man when I'm if I'm there with my
in-laws in London and around the corner
and it's got a very storied history
because 40 years ago it moved from the
east end of London which is right across
London to northwest London right east
end of London to north to to to
northwest and the Rabonim there who
headed the shul we're talking about 100
years ago we had two varonim before
Danaramsky one of them was Rab Aba who
was I if I'm not mistaken
I don't remember one of the old old
literature
>> I I know his name because in the in a
short biography written by Ditzky who
was a very pois
mentions ra as someone who disver
discovered the leash in Europe and he
used
>> the leash the grandfather of the makub
>> the first one who wrote like a like a
tiny description a short description on
the leash
didn't know that right
>> and so he Raa was succeeded when he was
left after a few years he was succeeded
as the R of Mikadas by none other than
Cook Ram Cook who was stranded then in
the first world war they couldn't
>> he already moved from Europe from East
Europe to Yafo
>> he was ready of the Yafo. Yeah.
>> Right. And then in World War I he was
stuck in in
>> so there on Marikad that's headed note
paper they there you have or or you know
it said during the war year the first
world war that is uh cook was was the
rav so he was then they had a few years
in between many years in fact in between
um and the next raft to come along was
Dina Bramsky and he he comes along and
then they the London basin say he's in
town this is such a great person we can
for strategic reasons and he's there
installed as the head of the London
basin now it's important to see to
understand the context. Again, there's
no visuals here in this podcast, but
just to see the photo of the the the
London Basin when he was in in in office
there in his early years, you see the
old style Dionim with their goatees and
their spitz bods and whatever it was,
right? English gentleman, you know, Tam
but with a look of of an English
gentleman and then Dan Bransky with his
tall literature Yamukan, this long beard
and and you see that was the the
situation he was he was coming into. Now
when you see when he left you see this
is the revolution he made because what
he was able to do is install Talmid Dian
Rapaort and uh Dian Gnas and Dian Mosha
Swift and uh Dian Grunfeld right who was
the husband of Robertson Grunfeld and
and that was part of the revolution that
he made. So the ambitious retelling of
of what he was able to achieve was comes
down to that context. was able to come
into a context in which the United
Synagogue for all of its orthodoxy was
in danger of slipping into liberalism
for the simple reason that Sir Robert
Cohen and people like him who led it and
ablely abetted by the Jewish Chronicle
which is the oldest Jewish newspaper in
the world which is as they proudly say
is always always leaning left and
leaning towards reform. They wanted
change and he stood in the way.
>> It wasn't easy. I understand.
>> Yet it was not easy for him to
>> as as you described before he he laid
down demands when he uh before accepting
the job.
>> Yeah, it was not easy to stand up to
them. And I think I think this is where
we get to the crux of the argument over
here. Again, it's it's something there's
no particular smoking gun in which you
can say one moment in which you can say,
"Hey, black and white, he saved the
empire from going get reform." But I
think there's there's a couple of
things. What and and I think you start
with the most important one, the Louis
Jacobs affair. This is the really really
really important thing where you see the
la the lasting impact that Dina Brmsky
had because after the Louis Jacobs
affair was uh revolves around the the uh
figure of Rabbi Louis Jacobs who was the
deputy rav of monks shul right in in
gold's green which is the mainstay of
the ekasha community kaha which came
from Berlin which is uh monks of monks
from Berlin which is basically one half
the mainstay of of of gold is green and
he was the deputy ro there. He was also,
I think, if I'm not mistaken, a product
of of one of the gates of Kyle if I'm
not mistaken. But anyway, Louis Jacobs
was a very very brilliant scholar and he
was seen as being on the way to take
over as chief rabbi after Rabbi Broady
if I'm not mistaken and he comes along
to Rabbi Brody was a good you know
Shamim or Rabbi Israel Israel Brody Lou
Jacobs and this eventually you have to
see what eventually became he split he
was outed as holding beliefs
that were not exactly orthodox and and
the most important was that is not
right. This was a man who was a
heartbeat away from being the head of
the chief rabbi. And this is what we're
saying because of British jury's
centralized nature. When you're chief
rabbi, you control everything. That's
it. There
>> an impact on thousands.
>> The impact on the whole of Brit
everything finished. You would have that
that would have been it. He eventually
when he was outed in an enormous scandal
it's just tied to you know the Louis
Jacobs affair when his cover was blown
when he came out and said no it's not to
not shine etc he was forced out he
founded his own movement called the
msorti movement which is still exists in
England morti is masi
and it was at one time
>> you have to differentiate the msi means
that someone believes in
it doesn't have the Right. Well, this is
why it's such clever branding, Herb Fry.
What was this clever branding? Because
his pitch to the bulk of British jewelry
was that you can have all the benefits
of orthodoxy. He had the culture. Well,
more than that, the benefits you can be
basically you can be the real thing, but
not have the problems. You could you
could you can do, you know, that's the
classic pitch of reform. But it was a
latter-day reform. It was long after the
heyday of kind of the peak this it was
reformed by stealth by the back door and
it was very effective and almost if I'm
not mistaken my my father was telling me
that you know Manchester which is I
think in the 80s or the '9s they were a
major a threat of a major takeover and
etc. It could have this man with his
charisma and his aerudition and his his
pitch to British jury was that come we
can ditch the old and you can stay you
you'll still have the benefits of it.
Imagine that. What was it that stood up
to Louis Jacobs? It was the dionim of
the London basin who he'd left in place
who were telling me that
>> was not there was no was not there but
he was in contact with them and this
would his spirit
>> he was directing things from
>> yes I don't know whether it was was you
know that I'm sure there must be
correspondence but there was never any
doubt that these these
>> what years are we talking about you're
talking about the late 1960s
>> in the 60s this was when it was and so
this was as if you if you like the
smoking gunner which you see this was
how Dina Brmsky comes comes along and he
ensures it was not the balabatim. The
lay leadership would never have done
anything. In fact, they wanted it. They
this was something they could have
embraced because they were so the
Yiddish were so attenuated anyway. It
was his spirit hovering over British
jewelry and and the strength that he
gave them because his talum remember
these Rabon and these donim he brought
them in instead of the old style
reversion
who were from Mir from Bananovich you
know Gdali is in their own in their own
right. This is an important accur that
aside being a dine in his own right,
you're saying that he he managed to
cultivate a whole team of uh people to
success him. Correct. He brought in to
the heart of the United Synagogue
instead of just sitting around in inside
the communities there of of Stanford
etc. And perhaps in gold's green is he
was able to because he was in in Israel
you're going to call it mami right
there's a figure a statesman's light
figure a figure who truly believe he
truly believe
>> he saw an odle who was willing to be at
the forefront
>> correct but no but it's it goes from I
think goes beyond then he was an oddle
and he was willing to be at the
forefront but he engaged with the main
institutions
of Anglo jury you know let's say in a
certain way you're going to find a
similar thing with Revelash as well over
here was people don't some people don't
like to remember it. He was a d on the
rabbanut. The rabbanut like it or not is
a powerful state sanctioned body and he
and's pitch was we cannot leave this
massively powerful organization to run
things without without the Torah being
there at the top at the top table having
a seat. In the same way, Dannky said,
"We can't just leave the London basin
with all its power and and the vast
majority of Anglo jury without the top
team there, without the top tur
personalities around." So what he was
able to do was you saw him in the Louis
Jacobs affair that he changed the nature
of the Rabonim who were then able to
stand up.
>> The ones who ones who blocked him were
the members of the Bezdon, not not the
the members of the official rabbin.
>> No, but they they lead and again they
lead the ravenut, right? the dionim and
this is one of the anomalies I think
we've talked in previous episodes the
anomalies of British jewelry is that the
kosher rabonim are called dionim right
anyone who knows danduna and and dianroy
they're technically dionim but there's
many kosher in England in America
they're certainly not the case the top
rabbon are not called dionim and that's
because of this thing because
>> so every everything was in
institutionalized everything came from
the structure of the government
>> well it's not everything was
institutionalized and therefore the
powerful rabbonim and the kush raon and
were the heads of the of the botin the
various botin that's historically why
it's been the case but what he also did
as part of this thing he was there
created because he was identifiably a
god of Israel he was identifiably a
giant Torah figure identifiably linked
to those worlds of first of Eastern
Europe then of Israel right and he was
in correspondence of Aaron Cutler he was
with the briskarov etc as we're going to
see the next in the next episode but he
was able to bring and support support
from inside the Jewish the British
Jewish establishment able to support the
growing Torah community. very much
encouraged Bahim to go off to to to
this talk lately that the society is I
recently heard Jonathan Rosen talking
about this at a podcast that the society
in is growing so much
>> they can't be look at the their role as
just saving themselves but like what do
we have to offer to the the general
republic and you're saying that Ramsky
is like the light in front of the of the
nation showing how you can take this
tremendous msira and change society
general society in England. Correct. In
other words, he refused. He said the
Torah has to be there uncompromising and
leading from the front of the mainstream
institutions that are associated in
let's say many kared's mind and many
very different from people's mind with
kind of the the you know the people who
are who too modern or too or drifting
away he said no they need leadership we
can provide it as well and in that I
think that's the story
that he was able as a gul to come and as
it were to save the empire. Beautiful.
Thank you for listening to Behind the
Times. We appreciate you joining us as
we explore the stories and people that
shape Jewish history. If you enjoy this
episode, please subscribe, leave a
review, and share with friends. Until
next time.